The evidence is the creation. Believe in evolution if you want. You are still looking at an intricately DESIGNED universe that begs an intelligent first cause.
I honestly find creationism to be more believable than evolution. I mean God creating certain pieces of the universe together over a period of six days thousands of years ago is much less preposterous than the idea of there beingnothing and then BAM! and over billions of years, the earth and al living things slowly evolve into what they are today. Evolution sounds like complete bosh.
This video is so wrong it's frustrating. There is so much data to support evolution, it's overwhelming.
"Evolution is a matter of making up stories in place of actual scientific data"
What is that??? Perhaps you got your words wrong there, and you were talking about creationism. Where is the scientific data in that? Is there as much? I think not.
Col 1:13-17 ...and hath translated us into the kingdom of his dear Son: In whom we have redemption through his blood, even the forgiveness of sins: ... For by him were ALL THINGS CREATED, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him: And he is before all things, and by him ALL THINGS CONSIST.
cience is the form of the new religion , a famous cientist recently said , cience did not let space for god, cience it is becaming the new baal, artificial inteligence will be the new idol to be worshiped
The fact of evolution is not in dispute in the scientific community. And the more evidence that is taken into account, the more robust evolution theory becomes. There is clear fossil evidence for the ancestry of birds and aquatic mammals and man. A mass of evidence for the connection of mammals to reptiles. Nearly everything said in this video is simply incorrect.
I think you'll find that evolution is in dispute. Much is published about the challenges to evolution and the responses issing. Don't deny it. The fossil evidence is anything BUT clear regarding the transitions you cite. Everything you have said is simply incorrect.
To take one point only. What the fossil evidence shows is that life has changed over time. The species, genera, families etc. that exist today did not exist in the past. Other species, genera etc did. Unless of course you deny most of the science of the last 200 years.
Yes life has changed over time. Yes at one time the species etc. that exist to day did not exist in the past. Other species existed in the past that do not exist today.
However the reason that all these different creatures exist cannot be the result of merely time and mutations. The fossil record shows that the families are more distinct as more fossils are collected.
The last 200 years of evolutionary thinking has not produced the fossils it needs to back it up.
>>However the reason that all these different creatures exist cannot be the result of merely time and mutations.>>
That's not what evolutionary theory says though, is it?
What then do you suggest is the reason that species are seemingly replaced by similar but clearly different life forms, getting, in general, more different and more complex over time?
then who does the seletion ??? a new species out of "nothing" ? , in did there are no new species, only less species... because they becom extint because of several reasons, bones proof nothing , neither viruses , neither dna , just human makes interpretation by their own interest, and invent teories , that is why is called theory ,cause it can not be proved , it can be 'acepted' , but not "proved"...
birds are NOT dinosaus. It's just that PE is conveniently unfalsifiable. There is no true positive evidence for PE, it just fits the LACK of evidence.
1:27 "...no transitional fossils between major life forms.".....Pardon??!!!
How about "Tiktaalik", a transition between a fish and an amphibian?
How about "Archaeopteryx", a transitional fossil between dinosaurs and birds?
To name just two. Come on people, I'm all for a discussion, but don't blatantly lie!!!!!
wjhopper 2 years ago
Tiktaalik, a fish and half a fish at that. Archaeopteryx, a bird and signicantly older than other fossil evidence of birds.
Interesting finds but not conclusive.
griffgriff78 2 years ago
@2:oo fact of evolution !!
there is no evidence for creationism.
Yes, they are screaming 'it's a fact'
gregrutz 2 years ago
The evidence is the creation. Believe in evolution if you want. You are still looking at an intricately DESIGNED universe that begs an intelligent first cause.
griffgriff78 2 years ago
I honestly find creationism to be more believable than evolution. I mean God creating certain pieces of the universe together over a period of six days thousands of years ago is much less preposterous than the idea of there beingnothing and then BAM! and over billions of years, the earth and al living things slowly evolve into what they are today. Evolution sounds like complete bosh.
Jakegothicsnake 2 years ago
This video is so wrong it's frustrating. There is so much data to support evolution, it's overwhelming.
"Evolution is a matter of making up stories in place of actual scientific data"
What is that??? Perhaps you got your words wrong there, and you were talking about creationism. Where is the scientific data in that? Is there as much? I think not.
WSUgirl 2 years ago
Lovely video series.
Col 1:13-17 ...and hath translated us into the kingdom of his dear Son: In whom we have redemption through his blood, even the forgiveness of sins: ... For by him were ALL THINGS CREATED, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him: And he is before all things, and by him ALL THINGS CONSIST.
1wingsolja 3 years ago
cience is the form of the new religion , a famous cientist recently said , cience did not let space for god, cience it is becaming the new baal, artificial inteligence will be the new idol to be worshiped
graysight 3 years ago
You mean science!
griffgriff78 2 years ago
T.H.E. E.V.O.L.U.T.I.O.N. C.O.N.S.P.I.R.A.C.Y. = "Those Honoring Evolution Eventually Vitiate Own Logic Using Theories Imputed On Nature, Continuously Offering Neopagan 'Science' Purposefully Inverting Reality -Attacking Creationism Yearly"
Acronym77 3 years ago
evolution is DUMB
jcook681712000 3 years ago
wow...!! that last comment was powerful..."society would never trust science again"...wow!!!
mugsy8888 3 years ago 6
Well noted. Perhaps he should society would see through the mystique of the infalilibility of scientists.
griffgriff78 3 years ago
The fact of evolution is not in dispute in the scientific community. And the more evidence that is taken into account, the more robust evolution theory becomes. There is clear fossil evidence for the ancestry of birds and aquatic mammals and man. A mass of evidence for the connection of mammals to reptiles. Nearly everything said in this video is simply incorrect.
hilbert54 3 years ago
I think you'll find that evolution is in dispute. Much is published about the challenges to evolution and the responses issing. Don't deny it. The fossil evidence is anything BUT clear regarding the transitions you cite. Everything you have said is simply incorrect.
griffgriff78 3 years ago
To take one point only. What the fossil evidence shows is that life has changed over time. The species, genera, families etc. that exist today did not exist in the past. Other species, genera etc did. Unless of course you deny most of the science of the last 200 years.
hilbert54 3 years ago 3
Yes life has changed over time. Yes at one time the species etc. that exist to day did not exist in the past. Other species existed in the past that do not exist today.
However the reason that all these different creatures exist cannot be the result of merely time and mutations. The fossil record shows that the families are more distinct as more fossils are collected.
The last 200 years of evolutionary thinking has not produced the fossils it needs to back it up.
griffgriff78 3 years ago
>>However the reason that all these different creatures exist cannot be the result of merely time and mutations.>>
That's not what evolutionary theory says though, is it?
What then do you suggest is the reason that species are seemingly replaced by similar but clearly different life forms, getting, in general, more different and more complex over time?
hilbert54 3 years ago
What then do you suggest is the reason that species....are more complex over time?
It is called Evolution
Origin of species by Natural seletion (not mutation)
gregrutz 2 years ago
There are ancient creatures that are very complex as well. The complex eye of the trilobite did not get it's name by accident.
griffgriff78 2 years ago
then who does the seletion ??? a new species out of "nothing" ? , in did there are no new species, only less species... because they becom extint because of several reasons, bones proof nothing , neither viruses , neither dna , just human makes interpretation by their own interest, and invent teories , that is why is called theory ,cause it can not be proved , it can be 'acepted' , but not "proved"...
graysight 2 years ago
The last 200 years of evolutionary thinking has not produced the fossils it needs to back it up.
Look again, they are finding new fossils every day, feathered dinos in China, 5 transitional whale fossils.
Evoluton grows stronger every day.
gregrutz 2 years ago
Evoluton?
griffgriff78 2 years ago
birds are NOT dinosaus. It's just that PE is conveniently unfalsifiable. There is no true positive evidence for PE, it just fits the LACK of evidence.
griffgriff78 4 years ago
punk eek is a paleontological theory that shows rapid speciation in geological layers ..this video is dead wrong about every thing
and birds ARE saurischian theropod dinosaurs
dancingnature 4 years ago 2