apple switched to Intel for two small reasons. It would allow for better compatibility with the windows world. you will also notice that there never was a macbook g5. this is becuase the g5 used a lot of power. intel is more eificient, but not nessasarilly better.
Plus Failed Scalability and Very hard production availability of current RISC processors... And in nowadays intel cpus, little endian processing is just a JIT emulation.
Just after "Yonah" intel chipsets, architecture is so similar to risc cpus with long pipelines,that allows fetch more data from cache.
Also, powerpc cpus had to increase their byte registers on die to access higher speeds.
That would be a waste of money ,too
This is a co-reason for global switching to x86/x64
Actually, PowerPC is designed to be capable of running in either big-endian or little-endian mode, and until the G5, it was able to switch from one mode to the other without needing to re-boot. The G5 lost this ability, which is one reason why VirtualPC had to be re-written almost from square one to be able to run on the G5.
x86 is fast and better than powerpc atm though intel xeon reached 6 cores and with its own built in memory controller and up to 6.4QPI which these guys dont have it but x86 is better than lower ones tho back then powerpc was the fastest and most reliable processor in the world
@Kzb75 eh i don't think apple will switch back to powerpc anytime soon, unless they can find a way to make the next one powerful and energy efficient unlike the g5.
this is retarded... big endian isn't more stable than little endian, its just a way of representing data... it has nothing to do with speed or efficiency of the processor... if anything, little endian is more efficient to work with for calculations involving reading/writing/manipulating memory
I'm not sure if you noticed or not...but the way my data is represented happens to be Grade A Eggs. Have you ever tried to balance an egg on the little end? Can't be done! Thus its less stable. What does that say about little endian from a processor architecture stand point? Absolutely nothing. I was always amused by technology borrowing "Endianness" from Gulliver's Travels where it originally referred to Eggs. This Joke is an expression of that amusement and inherently retarded. Laugh or don't.
I didn't notice as the video is titled "PowerPC vs x86: Endianess" and the description says "The battle between PPC and X86 wages on, and this video takes a stance through demonstrating the advantaged of big endian over little endian." I felt it was just dumb attack on x86 without any facts. The same would apply if you took the opposing stance with PPC.
The contents of an egg can decide its most stable orientation. Anyone (with nothing better to do) can modify an egg to stand on its small end.
this is genius.
iover9000 1 year ago
hahahahaha that was so fucking stupid lolz
donkeyass5042 1 year ago
So this conclusively proves that the PPC may be a bit slower, but the Intel is more like to break the "shell". roflmfao!
EddieBear631 2 years ago
Thanks for fun,
Then explain why even apple had switched to Intel !
acharad 2 years ago
apple switched to Intel for two small reasons. It would allow for better compatibility with the windows world. you will also notice that there never was a macbook g5. this is becuase the g5 used a lot of power. intel is more eificient, but not nessasarilly better.
pastryhat 2 years ago
Plus Failed Scalability and Very hard production availability of current RISC processors... And in nowadays intel cpus, little endian processing is just a JIT emulation.
Just after "Yonah" intel chipsets, architecture is so similar to risc cpus with long pipelines,that allows fetch more data from cache.
Also, powerpc cpus had to increase their byte registers on die to access higher speeds.
That would be a waste of money ,too
This is a co-reason for global switching to x86/x64
acharad 2 years ago
my power PC G4 in my emac dosn't have lepards tranparnt task bar wtf
joker71496 2 years ago
can someone tell me which is truely better, powerpc or intel?
planefreak3 2 years ago
Actually, PowerPC is designed to be capable of running in either big-endian or little-endian mode, and until the G5, it was able to switch from one mode to the other without needing to re-boot. The G5 lost this ability, which is one reason why VirtualPC had to be re-written almost from square one to be able to run on the G5.
OtakuBozu 2 years ago
x86 is fast and better than powerpc atm though intel xeon reached 6 cores and with its own built in memory controller and up to 6.4QPI which these guys dont have it but x86 is better than lower ones tho back then powerpc was the fastest and most reliable processor in the world
rysliv 2 years ago
my ass powerpc sucks
fillinthisblank 3 years ago
Many risc cpus such as ARM and some PPCs can be ran big ended or small ended.
Endianess is just a means o representing the data on wither the MSB or LSB s first.
Though I'll admit the X86 instruction set is one of the most horrid instruction sets ever devised.
Membrane556 3 years ago 4
NASA still uses allot of PowerPC boards, Chips
Playstation 3 uses a PowerPC 9 core CPU while
while Intel only has 4 cores per CPU
its really sad Apple did the switch, but for better mass production to compete with the supply n demand Intel was a good choice,
Mac OSX was always x86 & PowerPC compatible, check out an old copy of 10.0.1 if you don't believe me
I'm sure Apple will switch back in a few years,
Mac OSX is still gonna be ported to the PowerPC chips for quite a while im sure.
Kzb75 3 years ago 8
@Kzb75 eh i don't think apple will switch back to powerpc anytime soon, unless they can find a way to make the next one powerful and energy efficient unlike the g5.
Athos523 1 year ago
waste of time
bcaliman 3 years ago
ok? o_o
Stevenup7004 3 years ago
liek totally stupid! thats not scientiferic. i'm gonna rip on you with my poor grammar and inability to realize that your video is an intended joke.
delofter 3 years ago
power pc sucks! Intel rocks!!!! and eggs don't work will for tests unless it a taste test
randomgamer468 3 years ago
i rather stay with muy intel cchips ppc sucks
cotton509 3 years ago
this is retarded... big endian isn't more stable than little endian, its just a way of representing data... it has nothing to do with speed or efficiency of the processor... if anything, little endian is more efficient to work with for calculations involving reading/writing/manipulating memory
diin2live 3 years ago 4
I'm not sure if you noticed or not...but the way my data is represented happens to be Grade A Eggs. Have you ever tried to balance an egg on the little end? Can't be done! Thus its less stable. What does that say about little endian from a processor architecture stand point? Absolutely nothing. I was always amused by technology borrowing "Endianness" from Gulliver's Travels where it originally referred to Eggs. This Joke is an expression of that amusement and inherently retarded. Laugh or don't.
kwegibu 3 years ago
I didn't notice as the video is titled "PowerPC vs x86: Endianess" and the description says "The battle between PPC and X86 wages on, and this video takes a stance through demonstrating the advantaged of big endian over little endian." I felt it was just dumb attack on x86 without any facts. The same would apply if you took the opposing stance with PPC.
The contents of an egg can decide its most stable orientation. Anyone (with nothing better to do) can modify an egg to stand on its small end.
diin2live 3 years ago
Awsum!
cfxJosh 4 years ago
lixo
Capeta2004 4 years ago