Oh, & since most of the pictures you've posted have Ms Hartwell's watermark on them, and what with the lengthy introduction you've given her... there's nothing wrong with this video apart from the fact you're taking a closed-minded, petty, immature view of the entire situation. Good luck with that.
All she wanted was a little recognition for her hard work and respect for what she does. Permission and her name in the credits would have done it - it wasn't Ms Hartwell who blew things out of proportion.
For the record, she was going to donate the fee to charity. You guys are petty and sad.
It's what she does for a living, you jackasses. If something you created for profit was used without you being paid you'd have a hissy fit, I'm sure. If this band, which is a commercial entity, is too stupid to get permission to use copyrighted material, then they deserve to be sued, and after having declined a chance to be responsible I hope Lane gets a nice settlement.
it was a quick shot for ONE FRIGGIN SECOND. now if they used it as the cover for their album or something, i'd understand. but it was a simple shot of a guy shown for a second, and not even a particularly good one.
Meh...her best work was on camwhores
eyetolduso 9 months ago
YOU'VE STOWLEN MY SOWELLE!!!
abbazabba99 3 years ago
lane hartwell?
more like lame hartwell, amirite?
blackiron44 4 years ago
Lane sucks!
BellyButton3004 4 years ago
Oh, & since most of the pictures you've posted have Ms Hartwell's watermark on them, and what with the lengthy introduction you've given her... there's nothing wrong with this video apart from the fact you're taking a closed-minded, petty, immature view of the entire situation. Good luck with that.
kinggimped 4 years ago
All she wanted was a little recognition for her hard work and respect for what she does. Permission and her name in the credits would have done it - it wasn't Ms Hartwell who blew things out of proportion.
For the record, she was going to donate the fee to charity. You guys are petty and sad.
kinggimped 4 years ago
Actually, Richeter Scales offered to put her name in the credits. She refused. Nice try.
NodakPaul 4 years ago
it wasn't even a particularly good picture - just a quick headshot.
sarahsbooks 4 years ago
It's what she does for a living, you jackasses. If something you created for profit was used without you being paid you'd have a hissy fit, I'm sure. If this band, which is a commercial entity, is too stupid to get permission to use copyrighted material, then they deserve to be sued, and after having declined a chance to be responsible I hope Lane gets a nice settlement.
lakesidelivin 4 years ago
it was a quick shot for ONE FRIGGIN SECOND. now if they used it as the cover for their album or something, i'd understand. but it was a simple shot of a guy shown for a second, and not even a particularly good one.
sarahsbooks 4 years ago
Wow. Lanel Hartwell is ... not ... talented.
AkanAkanAkan 4 years ago 3
im featuring it or watever on my channel!!
gamerboy259 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
you're only pissed because she obviously goes to better parties than you do...
aprilangell 4 years ago
Lyke omgz you're totally right.
Couldn't possibly be the fact that she's suing over a 2 second, non-profit still image.
You got me.
iHeartLanelHartwell 4 years ago
You got to fight for your right to post copyrighted videos. Yeah. I gave you 5 stars.
HappyCabbie 4 years ago
worst photographer EVER
ryancomputer 4 years ago 2
LOL_ She's not a very good photographer. That band was doing her a huge favor.
Double lol- I just read the comment posted last :D
mienna1 4 years ago
The pictures are not even that good ...
simpilotdavid 4 years ago 2
That'll teach her.
Draxelzs 4 years ago 2
LOL
rextangle 4 years ago
Yeyyy!
nalts 4 years ago