Added: 2 years ago
From: IGNentertainment
Views: 29,522
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (592)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • NO THERE ISNT THE BEST, THE BEST IS THE OPTICAL, THIS IS A TURTLE WITH ROCKS IN THEIR BACK COMPARED WITH THAT.... SHIT"!!!

  • LOL this doom guy puts up a link in his channel its all a bunch of bullshit simple games that would be easy for the ps3 to do in 1080p, but what about killzone,metal gear, uncharted? all 720p fucking weak bullshit.

  • @satanspy i have a pc... it's newer but crappier than my PS3... crappier like the other pcs. and beyond3d well they're slightly smarter than you and you're freakin retarded!

  • @doommmmmmm my pc can do 1080p easily...

    your pc is shit. if it cant beat a 300$ console simple.

    that came out in 2006 using 2005 pc hardware.

  • @henryhenriquez LOL dude thats how it started look at my comment from a month ago..he thinks that old ass cell processor from 2005 can match an Intel i7 cpu, i loled. and he hasnt stfu since then, sorry dude PC's get better and more powerful every 6 months Consoles wait 10 years..the ps3 and xbox360 were already outdated by PC 6 months after their release.

  • @satanspy they were both outdated before release ^^.

    ps3 uses 7800gtx and at the time the 7950 was out and thats mutch better more hen double performance

  • @doommmmmmm pre built PC's from walmart and best buy dont count LOL typical dumb fuck console gamer always want things the easy way. how about you build a decent PC rig and get back to me oh thats right..you cant youre not smart enough,ill get back to my 6048x1200 gameplay now. have fun with 720p.

  • @satanspy lol power to price ratio fucktard.

  • @doommmmmmm ps3= Nvidia 7800 GTX, Xbox360 =ATI x1950 series these are the approximate PC equivalent of graphics cards when those two consoles came out. ATI is all the way at 6800 series now and Nvidia is at 480GTX there have been 10 PC generations in the time span of 5 years and the consoles still got the same weak bullshit lol time to get out of that 720p world youre living in. Graphics,CPU power,speed everythings better on PC

  • @satanspy 10 pc generation makes pcs outdated quicker. and if you haven't noticed for the last few decades console have been leading the gaming industry. consoles aren't outdated before they're available like pcs are lol.

  • @doommmmmmm ps3 was outdated on release....... so i dont knwo what your getting at. hardware wise ps3 was outdaten even before released. funy right.

    and what consoles dont get even more outdated as time goes by?

    lol they are almost absolete hardware.

    everything they do is slower then a pc

  • @henryhenriquez actually the PS3 is still future proof, oh and i've yet to see or even hear about 3D or motion controllers on pc hows that for hardware. or a home based pc with a processor developed specifically for supercomputers.

  • @doommmmmmm 3d has been on the pc for a long time. and all systems can do 3d its not that hard....

    even the ds can...

    motion controll the ps3 riped of from the wiii.

    ps3 cell is shit.. compared to mainstream pc cpu....

  • @henryhenriquez actually move was in development before wii was and no mainstream pcs fail to compete with supercomputer hardware. 360 is incapable of 3d, I've never seen 3d on pc, and besides w/ my PS3 i can have it on bigger screens. but let me bring up remote play PS3 can do remote play w/ pc/PSP/cell phone but pc can only do it with other pcs but it's not as practical as a much more portable device such as a PSP or a cell phone.

  • @doommmmmmm so they say. my pc is like 10 ps3 put toghether.. so meh and it doesnt cost 3000$.

    xbox360 crysis 2 is going to be 3d. if the 3dds can do it so can xbox360 it isnt hard you know.

    and pc ca connect to ANYTHING. its a pc it DOES everthing bluetooth, wifi ETC. anything.

    i can connect a move to a pc now with the program that just released as the ps3 controller

  • @henryhenriquez lol PROVE THAT YOU DID CONNECT THE MOVE TO YOUR PC crysis 2 will NOT be 3d on 360 i watched the E3 announcement for it and if pc can do everything then explain why they are vulnerable to viruses and PS3 is NOT. oh and have fun w/ the blue screen i did the same thing w/ my PS3 controller and pc the software is malware. as for the nds is not complete 3d like you see on the PS3. and my PS3 KILLS your fake pc.

  • @doommmmmmm viruses can be made for PS3 since it also has A OS. and ANY OS be it windows, MAC etc can ve fucked by a virus look at xbox360 a bug spread trough all of the xbox360 becuase they unlike pc dont have anti virus.

    i dont have move and i will not buy it since if i want motion controlls i have the wii.

    lol my pc can do 1080p in 3d in games your console games CANT

  • @henryhenriquez funny how you said you hooked up move to your pc in your last comment but now you said you don't have move lol love those self-contradictions, and if a virus can be made for the PS3 then show me evidence, and show me your 3d games. oh and w/ anti-virus on your pc your still not 100% guaranteed not to get a virus, i got a trojan on my pc w/ norton installed. and 360 well that piece of crap just gets errors w/o viruses the thing sucks period, atleast we both hate that piece of crap

  • @doommmmmmm i didnt say i hooked up i sayed some1 made a propram so they can and its possible to do it.

    check nvidia 3d vsion. basickly all pc games can go 3d....

    FYI norton sucks. period.

    like i said ANY OS can get virus. and consoles USE p2p system meaning they are more vulnerable.

    reason why they dont do it on ps3 is becuase psn is free, and nothing lmportant is stored on a ps3. pc market has more.

    xbox live did get a virus of some sort.

    3d pc games, ALL game so far.

    name a few.arma

  • @doommmmmmm assasins creed1+2, bad company 2, bat man arkham asylum, borderlands. all cod games. all civilization games. all 3 crysis games, dead space.

    i named those you know. and the library of 3d is so big it just ALL pc games LOL

  • @henryhenriquez lol and your fake source? they're not 3d games and i'm talking the 3d with the glasses not 3d world movement retard.

  • @doommmmmmm 3d games supported by nvidia 3d vision. its on my pc god dammit i would know if its 3d or not. and all those are supported.

    my gpu does 3d very easily.

    your gpu doesnt. it downscales games to get the ncesary fps to do 3d. mine doesnt.

  • @henryhenriquez PROVE IT EVERY WORD.

  • @doommmmmmm hm go nvidia website and see 3d vision... LOL thats like comon sense man. i dont need to prove it every1 knows it.. and those games are in my pc and they are fully capable of being shown in 3d becuase my gpu suports it... LOL you just failed big time.

  • @henryhenriquez hmm my PS3 fully supports it so i don't really care and if you haven't noticed that pc gaming has always been copying console gaming for lord knows how long. besides i can play PS3 for hours and not have to worry about carpel tunnel like i would with pc. and i can't stop laughing at you when you contradicted yourself earlier it's hilarious rofl rofl rofl

  • @doommmmmmm ps3 doesnt fully suport 3d. select few games do. and all the games take a graphical hit whipe out hd loses 1080p and is gimbed to 720p so it can be rendered at good framerates..

    lol like i said i can do 1080p and 3d without a problem something consoles cant.

    killzone 3 is 720p without 3d. while in 3d it drops to 480p or less.

    pc gaming has been copying?

    LOL consoles cpy pc. they use pc gpu, pc ram, pc hardrives LOL icne try kid. go learn history before. pc invented fps

  • @henryhenriquez truce not surrender.

  • @doommmmmmm meaning you found out that i was right and trying to save face.

    and you dodge the question till the end. name me a 1080p title thats not a psn game or a graphically simple game

  • @henryhenriquez nope try again. truce not surrender.

  • @doommmmmmm if that helps you sleep at night. you lost and i won. simple fact. you have no claims. and dodge the 1080p question still. nice try. learn to debate better. and have info to back you up

  • @henryhenriquez truce not surrender.

  • @doommmmmmm sleep well kid. and try a better argument next time

  • @henryhenriquez truce not surrender. no one loses. oh and i'm not a kid.

  • @doommmmmmm you lost simple. a truce would mean we agree on something and i dont since you havent showed me a 1080p game that is graphically intense like say a FPS etc.

    ncie try.

    only kids say truth and gives no reason

  • @henryhenriquez you are actually correct about truce being on agreeing something but that thing being is to walk away like men. truce not surrender. no one loses.

  • @doommmmmmm you mean like a some1 defeated and in shame? thats what was on my mind. since thats how your walking away after getting your ass handed to you by me.

    and only way to not get owned is to show me a 1080p tittle thats graphic intense. if you show me it may be a truce... but it will never be. since there isnt a graphic intense game on the ps3 thats 1080p all are 720p, killzone2+3, uncharted 2, god of war 3, MGS4(isnt even 720).

    so you lost. your not a men you are a child.

  • @henryhenriquez i'm the one calling for a truce like a man i'm the one who apologized for insults first like a man you did not defeat me.

    truce not surrender. no one loses.

  • @doommmmmmm you lost and are trying the truce card. so you save face. nice try that doesnt work here. so yea.

    nice try..you lost. truce is showing me a 1080p tittle agian lol

  • @henryhenriquez please start acting mature and agree to a truce not surrender. no one loses.

  • @doommmmmmm mature is accepting a lost and knwoing some1 has a higher intelect then and accepting a lost and not trying the its a truce. since i lost but im not going to admit it lol. nice try but i see right trough you.

  • @henryhenriquez you see nothing i'll always believe what i know you can't change that. and being mature is being the first to apologize that which i did. you've yet to apologize. being mature means agreeing to a truce not surrender. no one loses.

  • @doommmmmmm what you know is propaganda and fanboyism and not suported by facta and are actually contradicted by facts, and yet you denie it. aka. you lost.

    you apologised becuase you noticed you lost and tried to sweet talk me. doesnt work baby.

    accept you lost and ill take my insults back as it stand they are still there.

    and with every post it shows you are more of a kid that cant admit defeat when he lost

  • @henryhenriquez i apologized because i'm a man and would like to at least end on somewhat of a good note. i accept defeat when i know I've been defeated but i have not lost so agree to a truce not surrender. no one loses.

  • @doommmmmmm you are defeated reason why you keep on dodging the 1080p tittle i ask for.

    its your lost and take it like a man. i am more informed on technology then you and thus i won.

    only losers and kids say its a truth when they wont admit defeat

  • @henryhenriquez so says the kid who won't keep his word and agree to a truce not surrender. no one loses. after a gave you what you wanted.

  • @doommmmmmm id ont agrre to a truce becuase i have won. so why would i agree to it? only the loser will stand to benifet. from the not having to admit defeat. aka you. not me. i have won i have presneted my ace. you have yet to show me a 1080p tittle. you dodeg it like a plague.

    and only a kid doesnt admit defeat. a man accepts it.

  • @henryhenriquez nba listed again flower listed again now be a man and agree to a truce not surrender. no one loses. you never won i never lost i'm the only one here who can see this is going nowhere.

  • @doommmmmmm nba? wich one?

    2008/2009 are 720p so no not 1080p

    you lost try agian kid.

    and agian graphic intense games. not a POS game that can also be made on xbox360. and the wii...

    ncie try.

    you lost. fact the longer this goes the more inmature it makes you since you cant admit defeat.

  • @henryhenriquez nba 2009 is 1080P only on the PS3, but seriously you did NOT win so just agree to a truce not surrender. no one loses.

  • @doommmmmmm NBA2009 is 720p nice try it was confirmed by beyond 3d. nice try. and dont say they are not credible. since they favor no sides.

    i won you lost deal with it. it only proves you cannot withstand losing and has to call it a truce. lol doesnt work that way. it may work in kindergarden but not here kid

  • @henryhenriquez biased source you proved that yourself. i can take saying we are equal but it seems you can't. truce not surrender. no one loses.

  • @doommmmmmm whyis it biased? becuase it doesnt do pc? LOL. pc have no set native resolution. reason why they cant be counted. if i set it to 1080p it will be 1080p if it set it to 720p it will be 720p since pc renders it at the desired resolution not a set one like a console then scales to desires output.

    lol calling beyind 3d biased proves you are a fanboy. since they take no sides.

    you lost. cant admit defeat. probably a personal issue

  • @henryhenriquez if they were not biased then they would bash pc as well but not doing so cries out fanboy site. truce not surrender. no one loses.

  • @doommmmmmm becuase agian pc has no NATIVE resolution. like consoles. they are as high as a pc hardware can handle my pc can probably handle to 1600p even in crysis.

    for each pc there is a different native resolution so you can never say its that resolution set .

    consoles have set native resolution because its a closed platform but pc is open. your actually that stupid to not know this and try to make beyond 3d look like fanboys?

    LOL FAIL. your just in denial. you lost face it kid

  • @henryhenriquez if there is no native res then what do you see? nothing as res is what you see. truce not surrender. no one loses.

  • @doommmmmmm i choose my native resolution(render). and every else can choose a different on pc. but you cant on consoles they HAVE only 1 native resolution so it would be pointless to try to se all pc resolutions since it streches to infinity. and it renders not scale. so it IS that resolution you choose.

    wow you sure are stupid man.

    you lost. proven in every comment so far but you keep ignoring the truth AKA denail

  • @henryhenriquez when i set my PS3 on to my 1080P it gave me that choice. you keep ingoring what i say and intend so you also ignore the truth. truce not surrender. no one loses.

  • @doommmmmmm thats called upscaling kid. not render. render is dont by gpu then shiped out. then the output you can sellect but it has no effect on rendering since thats before it reaches the output converter.

    WOW thats a comon fanboy statement kid. thats far too easy to beat lol.

    another clear win for me. since you can change output but not the native resolution that is unchanged it WILL remain that on the consoles reason why its called native. it can upscale to 1080p and downscale. YOU LOST

  • @henryhenriquez no it's render. now accept a truce not surrender. no one loses.

  • @doommmmmmm no its not render its scaling. rendering is native resolution. thats the resolution the game is rendered at hence the name native resolution. changing display output wont change the rendering ti will only mean it will have to scale and make it blurry nice try kid you have been proven agian that you know nothing.

    your loss agian to ad the already HUGE loss area.

    keep fighting a losing battle its very funy for me kid

  • @henryhenriquez and you keep showing the world your immaturity by dodging the truce.

    truce not surrender. no one loses.

  • @doommmmmmm i dont dodge anthing and trying the denial of truth and say my oponent is denying isnt going to work.

    you lost since you dont even know what native resolution is KID.

    go back to school have them teach you that.

    you lost simple fact. you just cant accept being wrong. its called denail a very serious sickness.

    i only states truth you states stuff out of your ASS.

    nothing to back it up i back up my claims how about you try backing up your claims... oh wait you cant lol

  • @henryhenriquez your denying again. henryhenriquez

  • @doommmmmmm sure im denying lol that a unbiased site like beyind 3d. that does all console games. and reveals the truth behind the marketing. like they did with halo 3. so your saying halo3 is 1080p becuase thats what microsoft sayed. until Beyond 3d showed the truth. so why are they unbiased? huh? becuase you say so becuase it fits perfectly in your stupid head to make it seem like you not in denail?

    nice try. kid

    your in denail.

    you lost

  • @henryhenriquez never stated anything about any 360 game your the one who brought it up. i stated my opinions and why i have them there is no right or wrong opinion.

  • @doommmmmmm i used xbox360 as a example. since halo 3 was marketed as a 1080p tittle but it was show its actally 640p. when counted it can ve scaled to 1080p good becuase of good anti ailising but that still is 640p natively.

    you are wrong every point you made has been destroyed by me. you didnt even show me 1 1080p tittle. all where 720p can upscale to 1080p.

    ncie try you lost.

    your in denail kid

  • @henryhenriquez i shown you plaenty of 1080P games you just didn't believe because of ignorance. and you've never destroyed any points other than your own when you contradicted yourself.

  • @doommmmmmm you lost kid. go back to your reality bending buble where only stuff you believe in is important.

    fact is no ttile you showed me was 1080p. NBA 2009 was 720p. gt5p wasnt 1080p. nice try kid. you lost you dont know anything about hardware or software rendring.

    you lost face it and eat it fanboy.

    and when i contradict myself? when?

    LOL in your fanboy mind maybe

  • @henryhenriquez you use a biased source and you stick exclusively to playing pc, i play PS3 wii and pc and your calling me a fanboy? lol the titles are just a few that ARE 1080P but you refuse to believe it because that biased site doesn't know what they're doing and they probably haven't even been in a building with a PS3 in it.

  • @doommmmmmm keep believing they are biased.

    your just too stupid and buthurt.i play wii too retard. so im not biased sometime i play ps3 mostly for splitscrean with my friends we play mod wars etc.

    they have there own ps3 there own xbox360 and machines that lets them count pixel by pixel to determine resolution a game is rendered at. and also have another device that detecs AA on games.

    you fail kid. you know NOTHING about the proces.

    keep trying retard. calling them biased is stupid

  • @henryhenriquez yeah and i bet you also have superpowers... keep lying see where it will get you lol i thought you said you never played PS3 and if your pc can emulate wii then why use the real thing. and they are biased if they bash 360 and PS3 then why not pc? because they are biased. oh let me have some fun: which has more realistic physics FSX for the pc or IL II sturmovic for the PS3?

  • @doommmmmmm my pc is more powerfull the 10 ps3 put together.

    its not a super computer. and neither is a ps3.

    a super computer has 100000 cores. not 1.

    you are stupid. cant you read. they dont do PC becuase pc have no native resolution. cant you get that. they also dont do the wii.

    pc is a open platform. so no 2 pc will be on the same resolution you freakign retard.

    but consoles are closed platform they all have the same resolution. aka the NATIVE resolution.

    cant you get that you retard?

  • @doommmmmmm pc always has better physx. want to know why becuase our gpu are specially build to do it called physx suport and if games support it. it willl be mutch better then anything consoles can do.

    becuase consoles are weak. with ther slow ram. and intergrer operation have no cache for branch predictors. and allot more.

    are yu stupid?

    pc does everything and betetr then consoles.

  • @henryhenriquez funny how i just gave more evidence something you fail to do the cell renders the physic the gpu render graphics with the aid of cell but you don't seem to realize that. i clearly know more about the PS3 than you ever will. ps learn to spell better i don't care if english isn't your first but at least use spell check or something it's annoying.

  • @doommmmmmm physics are dont by the cell DUH. the gpu cant do it.

    but in pc its different, our GPU have somwething called physx that does physics mutch mutch betetr then a console could ever dream of kid.

    and physics are rendered stupid.

    the RSX does ALL the rendering. the cell can only do post procesing after the image is already render and draw. are you stupid?

    cell has no graphical pipelines so it cant render. the spe dont have acces to ram. so they cant render.you retarded?

  • @henryhenriquez when you say the cell can't render i KNOW you don't know as much as i do about the cell there are videos showing the cell running graphics without the rsx in fact whoever didn't update their systems and they still have linux the uses cell alone and there are plenty of people who render graphics lol i know you didn't do proper research if you did you wouldn't be speaking.

  • @doommmmmmm any cpu can render those stuff. now my question is what game only uses the cell to render?

    ALL cpu are bad at rendering they will all render slow and bad. becuase they dont have graphic pipeline. i can show you my i7 rendering the same shit as the cell. becuase its not a game.

    ncie try kid.

    learn before you speak

  • @henryhenriquez funny how you were saying cpu can't render graphics and now you are, contradicted yourself again but i never said there was a game that used the cell entirely for graphics but games like uncharted 2 use the rsx with the aid of the cell to render full native 1080P. learn before you speak. kodomo.

  • @doommmmmmm read my comment cpu cant render anything in game. all cpu can render but not render something that is in a game becuase it doesnt do it fast it enough. becuase they have no ROP and have no pipelines, no opengl. so they cant render anything. that is in games.

    sure my i7 can render, but it wont be anything that can be used in games same goes for your cell.

    LOL uncharted 2 is 720p you retard.

    rsx does ALL rendering cell does post procesing..

    you stupid? cant you understand english?

  • @henryhenriquez lol i'll believe you when you end up on a dev team for the PS3 but until then i'll stick with the Uncharted deves the cell helps the RSX by simply taking off some work so it can do other things but i guess the devs who created the game don't know as much about it as you do, a pc fanboy who can't even create a game lol.

    and i know English far better than you ever will. till then have fun with your engrish!

  • @doommmmmmm they toke of some work alright from the gpu called POSTPROCESING. alowing the gpu do more advance shaing.. are you fucking retarded i already said that and so did the developers.

    not render anything ALL rendering is dony by RSX. they took some of the post procesing task of the gpu and put it on the cell. learn to read. and know what post procesing is. you fucking retard

  • @henryhenriquez you NEVER said that, and the devs did say that the cell did do some graphics rendering. but i guess someone who has done so much research that they could literally start working for Sony and not need traing wouldn't know as much as you oh mighty one. lol

  • @doommmmmmm i know allot more then you retard.

    simply becuase i read all the documentation. and even the uncharted 2 developers naughty dog. stater that they just pushed some of the POSTPROCESSING task from the gpu to the cpu. and post procesing is thr last stage of image. after it is already drawn and rendered are you stupid?

    cell cant render anything realtim that can be used in games its too slow

  • @henryhenriquez you know something? i'm sick of you so i'm leaving all debates not as a loser but simply to be a better gamer i'm going to enjoy the games and not waste time arguing so i guess that makes me more of a true gamer than you. sayonara.

  • @doommmmmmm lol you lost this argument the moment you qent in it becuase i know im right. you just half assed rtried your stupid opinion. and got nothing to back it up. i backed up my stuff. and you denie it like the fanboy you are. denie developers notes. denie B3D, denie wikipedia... your stupid. and gameplay is opinion. i didnt like uncharted 2 one bit

  • @henryhenriquez whatever keep believing what you want if it pleases you. and you like uncharted 2 more then you did any research but i don't care anymore if you want to keep on this kind of stuff it's your loss. mattane.

  • @doommmmmmm uncharted 2=720, 30 fps, 2 AA.

    very easy to do. not technically impressive. it has allot of blur and bloom to hide textures.

    uses texture streaming when it can. and has allot of scripted events. barely has any realtime lightning.

    you lost since you dont know anything and pull stuff out of your as with nothing to back it up. we call that fanboyism

  • @henryhenriquez what are you trying to prove we all know the pc is better if it wasnt for the pc we wouldnt have the xbox or ps3. doommmmmmm was very ignorent in his comments but he was the bigger man by saying he likes gaming for what it is. and why do u keep comparing the ps3 to the pc? do u like putting other stuff down to make urself feel better? ps3 is a great console when it came out and so is the xbox. the pc is in a different league than the ps3 or xbox so why do u compare them?

  • @Reiterj3 becuase some1 went the whole ps3 is the greatest and has the best graphics.. blame sony propaganda. and the fanboys saying the cell is godlike

  • @henryhenriquez well it was god like as u would say when it came out and ibm did make the road runner back in 2007 but that was back then and the pc keeps evolving pretty much every month while the ps3 barely changes at all, and i still dont see why you should compare them both.

  • @Reiterj3 and here is the thing. ibw roadrunner doesnt use the cell thats in the ps3. it uses a 8i variant. mutch better. then whats in the cell.

    and even on luanch the ps3 was beaten by a pc.

    ps3 uses pc hardware you know?

    and the roadrunner is now very very behind. using pc cores xeon and opteron. fermi(all pc hardware)

  • @henryhenriquez did u read what i wrote? i said back then i said the road runner was the fastest in 2007 now ibm is working on blue waters which uses POWER7 CPU's. plus in the road runner they used alot of cores but it was still a cell. and there u go again by comparing the ps3 to a pc. like honestly give it a rest we all know its better so stop comparing them.

  • @Reiterj3 it didnt only use the cell but it used also opteron cores.

    why would they used power7 when powercell8i is out?

    and xeon. with fermi gpu tottaly dominate any cpu. high flooting point operation

  • @henryhenriquez why dont you go ask IBM why. but they are using 300,000 8 core POWER7 CPU's in the blue waters project.

  • @Reiterj3 power7 are not 8 core they are 1 core

  • @henryhenriquez well type in ibm blue water on google and then go on the wikipedia page it says "300,000 eight-core POWER7 CPU's with 32MB on-die L3 cache running at 4.0 GHz"

  • @henryhenriquez Actually, POWER7 processors have up to 8 cores with 4 threads each. If I'm not mistaken, they are the most power commercialized processors today, and their only competition on that level of the enterprise market is Oracle's SPARC processors (up to 16 cores and 128 threads, but with lower frequencies).

  • @Reiterj3 To be fair, Cell was "godlike" only on floating-point operations. For general-purpose computing, Cell is based on the same architectured used on the G5 processors Apple used until 2006, which had the Pentium 4/D lineups as their biggest competitors. By the time the PS3 was released, Cell couldn't compete on that aspect with Intel Conroe and AMD Brisbane.

  • @NewLynxChannel ill take your word for it.

  • @henryhenriquez Just a correction... I meant "most powerFUL commercialized processors".

  • @doommmmmmm If you're refering to the video titled "PS3's cell rendering in real-time WITH-OUT the RSX", it's actually a PS3 console connected to a cluster of QS22 server blades. The cluster is doing doing the rendering, all the PS3's Cell is doing is joining the pieces coming from the different blades to make the final image (which is a rather simple task).

    I posted this info on that video using my other account, "mathhenr". Look at the reply I got from the uploader, it's the first one.

  • @NewLynxChannel i could care less 've change from a fanboy like heryhenriquez to a true gamer, someone who enjoys the games and not argueing over whats best to play them on. goodbye

  • @doommmmmmm The expression is "I COULDN'T care less", by the way. And I'm not talking about gaming, I'm talking about performance.

  • @NewLynxChannel PRECICLY I COULD CARE LESSさよならばか

  • @NewLynxChannel its liek talking to a wall he denies reality. lives in his own bubble.

    so dont worry about him

    he fals under bones bend and reality bends idiots.

    en otras palabras es n pendeho

  • @henryhenriquez I'd say this particular one falls under "brain bends"...

  • And?It looks like a normal tv...

  • I wanna see that girl in 3D!

  • nasa geek - tv this, tv that, tv nice , tv, tv , tv

    hot chick - *Yawn*

  • lol all these fools still buying into the "cell processor" hype its just Sony talking shit again like they did with the ps2 and its "emotion engine" get an i7 Intel CPU and Cell gets owned really badly... you wont want to go back to Consoles again.

  • @satanspy irony of your comment is it really works and isn't just hype, don't confuse Sony w/ microsoft.since the cell is a supercomputer processor, that makes the PS3 marketable to more than just ppl who want entertainment, look at the 2 supercomputers the USAF made out of the PS3 it's power to price ratio kills pc easily.

  • @doommmmmmm lol

  • @doommmmmmm sorry buddy but theres no way in hell a cpu from 2005 is faster than an intel i7 930 or above no matter what you want to believe fucking console fags. the BS3 and lolbox360 cannot even run games in 720p much less 1080p PC MASTER RACE!!!!

  • @satanspy actually ps3 does support 1080p. native 1080p. oh and try telling your crap to the USAF they'l just laugh at you and say "go get an education kid!", i love idiots like you, exercises my lungs laughing @ you!

  • @doommmmmmm lol no it dosent youre the idiot. nether xbox360 nor ps3 can render a full 1920x1080 lines in 3d game Halo reach came out a few weeks ago and it was below 720p Modernwarfare 2 was 1024x600 i cant post links in the you tube comments but type "1024x600 modernwarefare 2" into google that should shut you the fuck up... im waiting for your response :) once again PC MASTER RACE..

  • @satanspy so far you've only proven that the 360 doesn't run 1080 lol that doesn't even count as a console i run 1080p on my ps3 all the time! and your only talking about games so does that mean your avoiding the fact that the PS3 is used in supercomputers renders your arguments invalid(which is true) and that you fully acknowledge that? fun fact: did you know a team of scientists got 1 ps3 to run a program that would take a cluster of 30 pcs to run in the same time?

  • @satanspy oh and if you were more logical you would not use "master race" for a multitude of reasons the biggest ones being, it can be offensive, and race as in the human race living beings not inanimate objects. pay attention in school if you haven't already dropped out kid.

  • @doommmmmmm go to the link that i messaged you BOTH shitty consoles cant do 1080p scroll down when you are on that link theres a whole list of ps3 and 360 games in pathetic 720p and as for the super computer argument thats because its cheaper to string ps3s together than to build a cluster around 30 pcs running i7 cpus you seriously think a cell cpu can compare to my i7 930 at 4ghz? ROFL what a joke.

  • @satanspy lol when stanford introduced the F@H for the PS3 their progress more than doubled in half a year, prior to that it was pcs the project started in 2000, and to this day there are more pcs running F@H than PS3s but PS3s still do more. if that isn't enough go directly to the USAF and talk to them why PS3 is better, oh and explain why is it that 8 PS3s networked can be equivalent to a $4mill supercomputer? it's been done before.

  • @satanspy oh and make sure your sources aren't outdated, lol you a freakin joke, baka! oh you think 4gh is impressive yet PS3 supercomputers have hit 6 gh. try that out for power.

  • @doommmmmmm 8 ps3's faster than a 4 million dollar supercomputer? LOL you realize how stupid you sound? show me links to back up this bullshit.. once again the only reason ps3's are being used is because of how cheap they are.

  • @satanspy i sent you a link explaining the process it'll also be in my channel comments box. BAKA!

  • @satanspy also try 200 gigaflops for power. pc looks even weaker now.

  • @doommmmmmm Why? A single RV770 chip achieves up to 1200 GFLOPS.

    Also, 8 PS3s achieve a measly 1433.6 GFLOPS and cost $2392. One Radeon HD5870 achieves up to 2720 GFLOPS and costs $359. If 8 PS3s were as powerful as a $4 million supercomputer (which is absurd), a single Radeon graphics card would be as powerful as two of them.

  • @NewLynxChannel maybe you should get your facts straight and use real sources not satanspy.

  • @doommmmmmm I did not use that guy as source. I used math as source.

    PS3 = 1 PPE + 6 usable SPEs = 7 * 25.6 GFLOPS = 179.2 GFLOPS

    RV770 = 0.75 GHz * 800 shaders * 2 floating-point operations per shader per cycle = 1200 GFLOPS

    RV870 (Radeon HD5870) = 0.85 GHz * 1600 shaders * 2 floating-point operations per shader per cycle = 2720 GFLOPS

    2720/179.2 = 15.18. In other words, PS3's Cell is 15.18 times slower than a RV870 chip considering their theoretical performances.

  • @NewLynxChannel my prediction is your almost as dumb as satanspy, use valid sources, the top of your head does NOT count

  • @doommmmmmm Fine. Read the IBM documentation about Cell, which is avalable for free on IBM's website, and you'll learn how to calculate its FLOPS performance. As for the ATI chips, you don't even need to, because ATI already specifies it for you. Go to the Radeon HD4870 and Radeon HD5870 (simply type those names on Google and you'll find them) and you'll see their FLOPS performances are 1200 and 2720 GFLOPS respectively.

    (I can't post direct links here)

  • @NewLynxChannel oh ibm? what happened to Sony and Toshiba? never heard of them droping out of cell like ibm(idiots). so i doubt that would be accurate.

  • @doommmmmmm Even though Sony ans Toshiba commisioned it, Cell is still an IBM-branded product. Also, as far as I know, Sony and Toshiba didn't publish any documentation about CBEA, so you have to use IBM's documentation.

  • @NewLynxChannel lol i DOUBT everything you just said it's been ages since they were with cell and they did the least work on it.

  • @doommmmmmm everything he said is true. look at the fact its right infront you yet you denie it. even the company that makes the cell

  • @henryhenriquez the company? oh so now cell is made by only one company and not 2? when did that change? i deny his statements because they are false do not take me for an idiot.

  • @doommmmmmm lol you got owned.

  • @henryhenriquez check out my latest comment i just owned your retarded lover retard!

  • $12,000 for the 55 inch model here in Japan. ONLY 55 inch model available for now. But the worst thing is, this thing suck more energy than my refrigerator!!

  • OK they put the Cell on TV's. Now it's time to use the 8 fucking cores Sony!!! Give us a major update that make the 8 cell cores work, bring back PS2 compatibility, and Other OS option !!!

  • @joaovictor1994 Cell has one core and eight RISC SIMD units, not eight cores.

  • @NewLynxChannel /REPLY ok thanks (I guess). I didn't get all technical because I'm not really into this kinda stuff you know what I mean? /ENDREPLY

    But all right, so let's say it correctly:

    Dear Playstation. The PS3 has a lot of power, and isn't even using it's eight RISC SIMD units, whatever that is. My question is, why? And please bring back the Playstation 2 backwards compatibility and the Other OS option :D

  • @joaovictor1994 Just in case you want to know, RISC (Reduced Instruction Set Computing) is a processor based on the concept that simpler (reduced) instructions are faster to process and therefore increase performance, while SIMD (Single Instruction Multiple Data) is a set of processing units that perform the same calculation on multiple incoming data at once.

  • @NewLynxChannel Oooookaaayy... That sounds awesome. AND confusing. But still awesome.

  • @NewLynxChannel oh and maybe you should learn what you are even talking about 1ppe and 7 spes that are stronger than pc cores lol.

  • @doommmmmmm The PPE is a 2005 PowerPC based core which was developed to compete with the Pentium 4 processors. And the SPEs have no access to system memory, no cache, no branch predictors and a limited set of instructions (compared to a processor core). SPEs only perform well on floating-point operations.

    By the way, Cell was ALWAYS manufactured by one company only, IBM. Like I said, Sony and Toshiba only commisioned the development project.

  • @NewLynxChannel and IBM DROPPED OUT AND NOW SONY AND TOSHIBA MANUFACTURE CELL NOT IBM, if i need to restate that then i guess it's your problem due to your IGNORANCE.

  • @doommmmmmm dude IBM manufactures the cell... cimple. ibm has many patents on it too.

    they made 8i powerxcell.

    for chirst sake are you retarded?

    IBM did most of the work.

  • @doommmmmmm IBM didn't drop out the Cell lineup. They won't update it, but they still manufacture the existing models, since they are needed for IBM's QSxx server blades. Also, if you go to the most recent iSuppli report about the PS3 slim, you'll see the Cell chip used on the PS3 is still manufactured by and branded as IBM. You'll also see that it costs $37.73.

  • @NewLynxChannel yeah and i am dead ibm basically said crew cell and left goodbye loser im sick of pc fantards so leave me alone i have a whole buch of races to do on GT5P untill GT5 is released so sayonara.

  • @doommmmmmm enjoy your sub hd game will i play dirt 2 in 1080p

  • @henryhenriquez your a comedian either that or your technologically impaired because i just beat the NFS hot pursuit demo in 1080P, oh and dirt 2 sucks balls but not as hard as you do! good bye have a horrible day baka.

  • @doommmmmmm demo, agian demos are shit.

    just like god of war demo final product will be 720p.

    gt5p isnt 1080p ty very mutch kid for the lols

  • @henryhenriquez and your sources are? lol there is a link in my channel comments to a list of some of the 1080p games on PS3 keep in mind that is not all of them.

  • @doommmmmmm demos are 1080p most of the time but NOT the final product. just google god of war 3 native resolution or GT5P native resolution or uncharted 2 native resolution or do you want the link with every game on both consoels native resolution on it? i can sedn you that

  • @doommmmmmm like i said NFS hot pusuit final produc is this=

    Need For Speed: Hot Pursuit = 1280x720 (2xAA on cars, no AA on environment)

    so thats what happens everytime with demos gives the false impresion its 1080p then the final product is 720p

  • @henryhenriquez ok then explain why GT5P which has no demo is in 1080P?

  • @doommmmmmm GT5P isnt 1080p its=

    Gran Turismo 5: Prologue = 1080p mode is 1280x1080 (2xAA) in-game while the garage/pit/showrooms are 1920x1080 with no AA. 720p mode is 1280x720 (4xAA)

    most people dont know this. funy how easy fanboys swallows propaganda. and thats confirmed google it

  • @henryhenriquez oh so your accusing Sony and polyphony digital of false advertisement? lol use some logic once in a great while. but i have some racing on GT5P in 1080P to do so fuck off bastard.

  • @doommmmmmm it isnt 1080p google it. just like halo 3 pure marketing. they are alowed to say what resolution it can scale to they dont have to say what its native resolution is.

    its a fact that gt5p isnt 1080p but 1280x1080 wich can scale to 1920x1080. haha nice try kid learn more.

  • @henryhenriquez you learn more, for one thing your using halo as an example so obviously you'll be right considering its console but i'm talking PS the ONLY console to ACTUALLY have NATIVE 1080P games like GT5P. but i can see you won't listen to me so if you don't agree with me then do NOT respond im sick of idiots like YOU! good bye and have a nasty day douche bag!

  • @doommmmmmm your the idiot fanboy all sites that did a tect on GT5P says its not 1080p but 1280x1080. LOL your just in denial.

    seen your type before lol.

    mostly becuase of sony propaganda. lol

  • @henryhenriquez dude everyone knows ps3 cant do a godamn thing in 1080p but superstardust HD and bullshit like that, dooom is in denial. google beyond3d and ps3 resolutions they have an actual SDK of bost ps3 and 360 over 90% of the games on BOTH crappy consoles are 720p and not only that they have a 10 year lifespan ROFL! so these console kids wont see what a full 1920x1080 lines of res looks like until 2016.

  • @doommmmmmm BEYOND3d revealed all. haha dude this doom guy dosent know shit hes been messaging me back and forth for days trying to rationalize why his weak ps3 cant do 720p GET A PC FAGGOT! BEYOND3d OWNED LOLBOX360 AND BS3!!!