lol, you waterproof that thing 1st?
TheLeastDiseased 5 months ago
since sound can be heard more clear and from long distances, it would sound awesome with a lot of musicians :)
Stravinsky91 6 months ago
@Stravinsky91 Under water*
This has been flagged as spam show
love this. thumbs up.
pianonextdoor 8 months ago
"We can't always explain why people do things, but we can explain how. eHow.com"
keetonbob 1 year ago
LOL!
too much beer
featheredmusic 1 year ago
Underwater metal band while weaving baskets with ur feet and tieing knots in cherry stems
douchebagcrew9 2 years ago 2
That's not very beautifull! XD
Bikiniee 2 years ago
Wow. A copper violin!
Cheers, Terry.
useryug 2 years ago
I've often 'wished' to hear bagpipes under water,
and this confirms my worst fear: I'd still hear them! : ) Actually I think this violin experiment
was interesting and fun. Thanks to my friend Dan for sharing this. I'll have to send it to my
friend in Umea: Manges. Cheers from South
Florida, where every seeming periscope, now has the potential of being a sunken Strad! ~Terry
BocaFriend 2 years ago
Lol - Thanks Terry.Food for thought :-)
fendermac 2 years ago
Acutally, since bagpipes are a wind based instrument, you probably couldn't hear them underwater.
ChrisSketch 2 years ago
I suppose it would depend in part if the bagpiper was using the 'buddy breathing system' ?! LOL.
Just kidding about the whole bagpipe thing, Chris!
Cheers, ~T
You might have a chance of getting one quick note in with a full bag being submerged but it would be next to inaudible. Then the sound would be cut off altogether right afterwards once water makes its way through the chanter and to the reed.
Gilleece666 2 years ago
that is so stupid
ideacatarsis 2 years ago
Now, that is what you call "Water Music!" LOL!
Great job, Johan Lingegård!
SCSQ4 2 years ago 2
haha va roligt
0becky00 3 years ago
woooooow awesome....!!!!! i din'd know that it's posible
sinmusnov 3 years ago
lol, you waterproof that thing 1st?
TheLeastDiseased 5 months ago
since sound can be heard more clear and from long distances, it would sound awesome with a lot of musicians :)
Stravinsky91 6 months ago
@Stravinsky91 Under water*
Stravinsky91 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
love this. thumbs up.
pianonextdoor 8 months ago
"We can't always explain why people do things, but we can explain how. eHow.com"
keetonbob 1 year ago
LOL!
too much beer
featheredmusic 1 year ago
Underwater metal band while weaving baskets with ur feet and tieing knots in cherry stems
douchebagcrew9 2 years ago 2
That's not very beautifull! XD
Bikiniee 2 years ago
Wow. A copper violin!
Cheers, Terry.
useryug 2 years ago
I've often 'wished' to hear bagpipes under water,
and this confirms my worst fear: I'd still hear them! : ) Actually I think this violin experiment
was interesting and fun. Thanks to my friend Dan for sharing this. I'll have to send it to my
friend in Umea: Manges. Cheers from South
Florida, where every seeming periscope, now has the potential of being a sunken Strad! ~Terry
BocaFriend 2 years ago
Lol - Thanks Terry.Food for thought :-)
fendermac 2 years ago
Acutally, since bagpipes are a wind based instrument, you probably couldn't hear them underwater.
ChrisSketch 2 years ago
I suppose it would depend in part if the bagpiper was using the 'buddy breathing system' ?! LOL.
Just kidding about the whole bagpipe thing, Chris!
Cheers, ~T
BocaFriend 2 years ago
You might have a chance of getting one quick note in with a full bag being submerged but it would be next to inaudible. Then the sound would be cut off altogether right afterwards once water makes its way through the chanter and to the reed.
Gilleece666 2 years ago
that is so stupid
ideacatarsis 2 years ago
Now, that is what you call "Water Music!" LOL!
Great job, Johan Lingegård!
SCSQ4 2 years ago 2
haha va roligt
0becky00 3 years ago
woooooow awesome....!!!!! i din'd know that it's posible
sinmusnov 3 years ago