now i have upadated my pc with 6400x2 amd black edition and i bought zalman 9500 cooler.also i trade 2900xt gecube with a2900xt asus.now my 3dmark is 10.420
Yes the 6400+ Black is the best AMD CPU to buy, Great price, very fast, and overclockable. Fastest at least until the newer batch of Phenom CPUs come out. I am not going to buy a Phenom CPU unless It's at least 2.8GHz-3GHz, and 500MHz Overclockable
i cant see differnce between2900 and 3870.also 2900 has 512 interface so when resolution is higher than 1280x1024 you can se that 2900 is better than 3870.
The HD3870 are in general faster than the 2900XT, even under highest resolutions even if the memory interface is only set to half. It'll be cool to see HD3870X2 within two months, packing in 640 Streamprocessors is rather fancy, especially when making 1280SP during Crossfire.
or something the 2900xt doesnt have, crossfire X, how about 2560sp? mouth watering! off course, thats totaly rediculas and i dont think they make a motherboard with 4 pci express slots.
wat im gettin at is the gHZ, its truly a lot faster than the Quad, plus 4 threads are for crazy motha fuckin mult-task peps. 2 threads is good enough for us gamers. Of course there is Extreme Quad, but who has 1 G's to waste....plus the intel mobos suck for SLI. AMD ftw...
Otherwise, we'd all still be using OC'd P4's. Even a Q6600 beats pretty much anything AMD can throw against it. Intel's out on 45nm while AMD's just getting to 65nm. Not to mention the difference in the benchmarks, both synthetic and real world.
AMD fails hard. No wonder they can't turn a profit.
somewat true, but intel fails to deliver good mobos. espeically to support the new 45nm. Only 1 good mobo, and its pretty much junk. AMD has good mobos and its bios is an ez setup. Intel you have to check out everything and make sure its up to par, otherwise it wont work. AMD has one good chip, the 6400 black addition. The quad is trash for amd.
I'm not fond of the Intel X38/48 chipset mobos, to be honest. Especially their lack of SLI support, but that's mostly Nvidia's choice. I'd rather use NV's 790i with SLI, presuming the spat between Intel and Nvidia resolves itself and we have Yorkfield 45nm support.
I hope AMD gets back in the game here. Competition is good for all of us, whether you prefer Intel or AMD. So far, all I've seen of AMD's quad core is a pretty logo. :x
meeeeeeeeh, i would have to say the dual-core beats the q6600. cuz, the fbs for the quad is 1066 mhz and the dual is 1333 mhz. plus, u dont need a q6600 for gaming, dual will serve u just fine. otherwise both are semi-similar, but with 2 thread difference...
also my brother has similiar card to mineand ram, but he has a e6600, mines a q6600 , when he destroys a few huts etc his lags like mad , mine dosnt , due to the 3rd and 4th core for dedicated physics threads( or whatever it is)
yes, but the e6600 is much cheaper, but on anuther note, an amd athlon 64 x2 6400+ black edition(black edition is made just for overclocking) is faster then the e6600 and is cheaper.(runs at 3.2ghz and costs $180)
Im getting crossfired 3870's in a month or two... try pay out ATi then. The GTX's are way overpriced now imo when comparing with the 8800GT and 3800 Series they have nothing.
lolak47, Intel costs you more because their memory controller is located on the motherboard. This means Intel uses more watts then AMD who chose to place their memory controller on-chip.
ATI isn't a waste of money by any means, but they have no high end graphic card option. Sure the 2900's are upper middle, but they have nothing on the 8800 GTX's. I have not seen acceptable frame rates on newer games from these cards(I was considering them). Given they are a cost effective solution, they just can't deliver the performance of Nvidia's higher end cards.
That is indeed your Opinion and he doesn't give a fuck. I always see the same bullshit FYI all you nubs the video is about what he is showing you it's not a fucking music video everyone has there likes and dislikes but what gives you the right to point some stupid ass shit like that out?
second off, the 2900xt still cannot compete with any g80 despite its specifications because of the lacking ROPs at the output of the card..in dx9 the algorithm to anti alias a 3d image is different from the new, build from the ground up, dx10. ati didn't think of this, so they hadn't put any "backwards compatible" components on the card, r600 wasn't built to render with AA on (LOL Laughing ), and because
third, just because the specs look as if there 2x as good as g80, there if anything, slightly lower. the huge amount of lacking ROPs on the card KILL the potential performance, the shaders on the 2900xt are clock HALF the speed of 88xx and aren't as universal or organized as 88xx, and this is something that amd/ati can't fix with new driver updates..
of this it needs to emulate dx9 AA..so if you enable ANY type of AA in ANY game w/ the r600, it could possibly slow to a crawl, being beat by midrange cards at some times.
Nice job putting the vid together....AMD and ATI is a good combo. It still holds true that ATI has better quality with lower frame rates and Nvidia has more frame rates though they have come a LONG way in the field of image quality. I think both companies have good graphics, it's mostly a matter of preference. As for processors, it's a tough call. AMD has some really good products on the way and out there but Intel does too. All I have to say is if AMD dies, we all lose.
Intel is dominating AMD right now. Don't take me wrong, i have been an AMD boy ever since my first rig back in 02' but until AMD comes out with a cpu to compete with intel, im going intel
100% true only difference you can get amd x2 6000+ for about 150+ dollars less than its intel equivalent and there is about a 5% difference in performance.
LOL my e6700 (2.67GHz X2), 2 gig corsair ram, Creative X-Fi Xtreme Gamer, evga 680i m/b, 320gig seagate hdd and a Nvidia XFX 8800GTX XXX (620mhz core) scores 11111 3D marks in 3D mark 06... that looks good on a viewsonic VX2235wm :D
You can get two of his Sapphire HD2900xt for the price of an XFX 8800gtx. Also Crossfire gets mcuh better results than SLI. Last, HD2900xt is made to compete with 8800gts not the GTX or Ultra.
pentium LOL, welcome to the 21 century there are chips called the "core 2 duo" and "core 2 quad/extreme" cpus, i think the conroe cpus just smack those amd chips off the board ;P
I get 9800pts in 3dMark06 with same configuration but with a X2 6000+. And as a reminder, remember DX9 is about optimization, you don't need to spell out "DX9 gaming" that hard since DX10 only optimizes data transfers and optimization of vital components. Kind of bad performance while recording too, I think you lack some drivers.
No he shouldn't, the 2900 xt was never made to compete with the 8800gtx or ultra... it was made to compete with the 8800gts and it beats the 8800gts and is close to the 8800gtx at higher resolutions.
Right? GPU's aren't only made to compete. They're made to perform and the 2900XT comes close to even the 8800 Ultra. When they make cards, they make it as good as possible. Or who would want to buy a product that isn't at it's full potential?
I agree but the whole Nvidia vs. ATI debate will never end. I've always like ATI better for some reason but I'm probably getting an Nvidia if I get a new computer because HD2900xt's are harded to get wher I'm buying. But they're essentially the same products with usually around 3-4 fps difference. Doesn't really matter what brand you have as long as the card performs.
At higher resolutions the framerate difference between Nvidia and ATI is more like 5-10. I would suggest Nvidia, cheaper cards and more power and texture abilities. For instance the 8800 GTS out performs the 2900XT in some areas and costs almost 150 $ less.
You're thinking about the 8800GTS 320 mb which doesn't compare to 2900xt at all. The 640 mb 8800gts which is the one they benchmark with is more expensive than 2900xt. The 8800gts rarely outperforms 2900xt, which is what is interesting. Why would Nvidia have better texture abilities, that comes down to the graphics engine, and both cards support equal amounts of anistropic filtering+antialiasing
well its safe when ur an nVidia/intel, fanboy because you're guaranteed quality and functionality. AMD and ATi is a bit of a risk with their drivers and lack of evolving technology
Yeah and nVidia and Intel are best, that's why I buy their shit. I've had bad experiences with ATI and AMD so I got my reasons not to buy their stuff.
And also the most expensive. ATi and AMD has innovations on the way favoring those who already own a AMD setup. Better to think ahead rather than trying to get that extra frame per second.
*TURNS SOUND OFF*
Kaasbalable 4 months ago
Nice setup
nismoking1994 1 year ago
how is the 2900 xt?
kpgpwi64 1 year ago
now it's kinda obsolete
Cypeq 2 years ago
Linkink Park - one step closer
Lethalcleric 2 years ago
What was the song?
Oneworld87 2 years ago
your comp sucks
coteya 3 years ago
2900 xt of club 3D? lol :D
alecromatico 3 years ago
whats wrong with the Club3D card?
MiBrada 3 years ago
You still got the 2900xt
richardh754 3 years ago
fancy ram..
i bet it cost too much though
Ezekielpurger 3 years ago
what is that strategy game?? is that generals? or what?
cyther39 3 years ago
WORLD IN CONFLICT
sainopoulos 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Read : Texture Compression Techniques and Tips"
ATI uses the 3Dc Compression Format its the 4:1 compression that gives you higher frame rates at higher resolutions
8309400 3 years ago
WIC is DX 9
22trol22 3 years ago
oxi dn ime kalos
aek210 3 years ago
ty alot man!!!:)))
sainopoulos 3 years ago
Man Best PC you have make with ATI RADEON AND AMD ! The Best Solution ! and NICE Music !
I love AMD and ATI RADEON !
MasterDOOM2010 3 years ago 3
nice rig
evo8FQ400 3 years ago
A amd phenom 9850 pisses all over a 6000, are you being real, a 9850 plus 4 3870 gpus and you have a good system
TheTranceMan111111 3 years ago
yay.. beautiful sun and water effect !
xJianwei92x 3 years ago 2
To much linkin park for me...
thibault928 3 years ago
Intel + Geforce = Spank :D Watch my videos ^^
NGT2O6 4 years ago
good luck m8 but amd ati are winning now unluckky
DarkLordPleb 4 years ago
You what? Where did you get that info from?...
chrizftw 3 years ago
ATI are flattening nvida at the min
TheTranceMan111111 3 years ago
First of all its Nvidia, but no they're not. Why do you say that?
chrizftw 3 years ago
quad 3870s vs nvidia, lol, ati kicks ass
TheTranceMan111111 3 years ago 3
Tri 9800GTX's beat Quad 3870s...
chrizftw 3 years ago
now i have upadated my pc with 6400x2 amd black edition and i bought zalman 9500 cooler.also i trade 2900xt gecube with a2900xt asus.now my 3dmark is 10.420
sainopoulos 4 years ago
Same processor as me then i got a 6400 it owns big!!!!
Razsor 4 years ago 3
Yes the 6400+ Black is the best AMD CPU to buy, Great price, very fast, and overclockable. Fastest at least until the newer batch of Phenom CPUs come out. I am not going to buy a Phenom CPU unless It's at least 2.8GHz-3GHz, and 500MHz Overclockable
Wigwahm 3 years ago 2
great vid. i just built my new machine, Athlon X2 4000 @2.6, 2gb ddr2 667, Radeon HD 3870, it screams, but i need a better board and more memory
andrewbt1991 4 years ago
no what u need is a better cpu unless you got that thing runnin at like 3.0ghz its a bottleneck for that card
S1lverspike 4 years ago
4000? i would upgrade to at lest a 6000+ black edition, or if you want to be adventerous, get the phenom 9600+ black edition.
xxhaloownerxx 4 years ago 2
why the standard cooler? The 3870 is way better and cheaper compared to the 2900xt. Check out my pc
T2MJUMP 4 years ago
what game was that men
kurdboy121 4 years ago
i get the same FPS and higher and my computer dosnt seem as good as yours. i have
AMD AM2 Single core 3800+ O/C 2.6Ghz
2.5GB DDR2 533MHZ
ATI 3870 512MB GDDR4
Windows Vista 64bit oem.
updating soon to
4GB DDR2 800Mhz
AMD 6400+ black edition.
the 3870 is much better than the 2900XT you should flog it on ebay and get a 3870 much better and cheaper.
godseesnocolour 4 years ago
i cant see differnce between2900 and 3870.also 2900 has 512 interface so when resolution is higher than 1280x1024 you can se that 2900 is better than 3870.
sainopoulos 4 years ago
The HD3870 are in general faster than the 2900XT, even under highest resolutions even if the memory interface is only set to half. It'll be cool to see HD3870X2 within two months, packing in 640 Streamprocessors is rather fancy, especially when making 1280SP during Crossfire.
BorkaBonum 4 years ago
or something the 2900xt doesnt have, crossfire X, how about 2560sp? mouth watering! off course, thats totaly rediculas and i dont think they make a motherboard with 4 pci express slots.
qwertymac93 4 years ago
Quad-core Q6600 @ 2.4 or
Quad-core Q6700 @ 2.66.
AMD 64X2 @ 3.2
wat im gettin at is the gHZ, its truly a lot faster than the Quad, plus 4 threads are for crazy motha fuckin mult-task peps. 2 threads is good enough for us gamers. Of course there is Extreme Quad, but who has 1 G's to waste....plus the intel mobos suck for SLI. AMD ftw...
gnotleo 4 years ago
It's not all about clock speed, you know.
Otherwise, we'd all still be using OC'd P4's. Even a Q6600 beats pretty much anything AMD can throw against it. Intel's out on 45nm while AMD's just getting to 65nm. Not to mention the difference in the benchmarks, both synthetic and real world.
AMD fails hard. No wonder they can't turn a profit.
WarwulfX 4 years ago
somewat true, but intel fails to deliver good mobos. espeically to support the new 45nm. Only 1 good mobo, and its pretty much junk. AMD has good mobos and its bios is an ez setup. Intel you have to check out everything and make sure its up to par, otherwise it wont work. AMD has one good chip, the 6400 black addition. The quad is trash for amd.
gnotleo 4 years ago
I'm not fond of the Intel X38/48 chipset mobos, to be honest. Especially their lack of SLI support, but that's mostly Nvidia's choice. I'd rather use NV's 790i with SLI, presuming the spat between Intel and Nvidia resolves itself and we have Yorkfield 45nm support.
I hope AMD gets back in the game here. Competition is good for all of us, whether you prefer Intel or AMD. So far, all I've seen of AMD's quad core is a pretty logo. :x
WarwulfX 4 years ago
lol, the logo is only the good thing about it.
gnotleo 4 years ago
its all about asus and gigabyte , maybe
girlsdrinkfeck 4 years ago
i ahve a q6600 , got it last week , pity my 2mb cache hdd lets it down lol :(
girlsdrinkfeck 4 years ago
meeeeeeeeh, i would have to say the dual-core beats the q6600. cuz, the fbs for the quad is 1066 mhz and the dual is 1333 mhz. plus, u dont need a q6600 for gaming, dual will serve u just fine. otherwise both are semi-similar, but with 2 thread difference...
gnotleo 4 years ago
yes i do :) crysis and other upcomming games uses all 4 cores, plus my q6600 is oc'd to 1333fsb and still only runs at 20c , cheaper is better ;)
girlsdrinkfeck 4 years ago
Quad-Cores will only boost about 25-30% theoretical performance in Crysis.
BorkaBonum 4 years ago
also my brother has similiar card to mineand ram, but he has a e6600, mines a q6600 , when he destroys a few huts etc his lags like mad , mine dosnt , due to the 3rd and 4th core for dedicated physics threads( or whatever it is)
girlsdrinkfeck 4 years ago
yes, but the e6600 is much cheaper, but on anuther note, an amd athlon 64 x2 6400+ black edition(black edition is made just for overclocking) is faster then the e6600 and is cheaper.(runs at 3.2ghz and costs $180)
qwertymac93 4 years ago
Im getting crossfired 3870's in a month or two... try pay out ATi then. The GTX's are way overpriced now imo when comparing with the 8800GT and 3800 Series they have nothing.
Procod2player 4 years ago
ati rulez because NV only test and benchmark and 3d mark
ati rulez in game real test! no fucking 3d mark for NV piece of shit
adambs2 4 years ago
fucking nice rig i got same 2900xt 5200 2g ram (ram diff brand same for hardy and mobo)
sli93 4 years ago
i think intel is more better
lolak47 4 years ago
lolak47, Intel costs you more because their memory controller is located on the motherboard. This means Intel uses more watts then AMD who chose to place their memory controller on-chip.
How can Intel be better? Do some research.
enigma067 4 years ago
i got a amd and a intel pc and i think amd is good but i like intel cuz its more faster
lolak47 4 years ago
plus amd is way better for you pay for :) XD
sli93 4 years ago
Currently thats right, but amd slayed intel for many years lol. im still an amd fanboy lol.
cyserox360 4 years ago
ATI isn't a waste of money by any means, but they have no high end graphic card option. Sure the 2900's are upper middle, but they have nothing on the 8800 GTX's. I have not seen acceptable frame rates on newer games from these cards(I was considering them). Given they are a cost effective solution, they just can't deliver the performance of Nvidia's higher end cards.
Jeremymtw 4 years ago 3
2900xt HIGHLY OVERCLOCKABLE! like very high theres 2 power option for it mate..it can overclock like a beast
sli93 4 years ago
the soprano is gay
Kingbongoman 4 years ago
Fk off theglenlivet12, LP Fking rule just cause he doesn't listen to barbies greatest hits. Lol and ATI aint a waste of money they pwn nvidia anyday.
Procod2player 4 years ago 2
LP is AWESOME!!
annihilationstation 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
ATI... what a waste of money lmao
NVIDIA FTW
datnigahsp 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
ATI.. what a waste of money lmao
NVIDIA FTW
datnigahsp 4 years ago
All thats left to update is your taste in music XD
theglenlivet12 4 years ago
That is indeed your Opinion and he doesn't give a fuck. I always see the same bullshit FYI all you nubs the video is about what he is showing you it's not a fucking music video everyone has there likes and dislikes but what gives you the right to point some stupid ass shit like that out?
odogxx 4 years ago 3
Nice computer :D
evolutionpr 4 years ago 7
NVIDIA AND AMD FTW
evolutionpr 4 years ago
nice pc
sebastianini 4 years ago 6
diamond ati radeon hd2900xt 1 gb gddr4 dominates the market
HeavyMetalJack 4 years ago
sigh...let me start off
first off all the 1gb 2900xt was released FROM LAUNCH (thats right..) for specific system vendors..
themisiek2 4 years ago
second off, the 2900xt still cannot compete with any g80 despite its specifications because of the lacking ROPs at the output of the card..in dx9 the algorithm to anti alias a 3d image is different from the new, build from the ground up, dx10. ati didn't think of this, so they hadn't put any "backwards compatible" components on the card, r600 wasn't built to render with AA on (LOL Laughing ), and because
themisiek2 4 years ago
third, just because the specs look as if there 2x as good as g80, there if anything, slightly lower. the huge amount of lacking ROPs on the card KILL the potential performance, the shaders on the 2900xt are clock HALF the speed of 88xx and aren't as universal or organized as 88xx, and this is something that amd/ati can't fix with new driver updates..
themisiek2 4 years ago
of this it needs to emulate dx9 AA..so if you enable ANY type of AA in ANY game w/ the r600, it could possibly slow to a crawl, being beat by midrange cards at some times.
themisiek2 4 years ago
Nice job putting the vid together....AMD and ATI is a good combo. It still holds true that ATI has better quality with lower frame rates and Nvidia has more frame rates though they have come a LONG way in the field of image quality. I think both companies have good graphics, it's mostly a matter of preference. As for processors, it's a tough call. AMD has some really good products on the way and out there but Intel does too. All I have to say is if AMD dies, we all lose.
pk4490 4 years ago
Intel is dominating AMD right now. Don't take me wrong, i have been an AMD boy ever since my first rig back in 02' but until AMD comes out with a cpu to compete with intel, im going intel
c0dy14 4 years ago
100% true only difference you can get amd x2 6000+ for about 150+ dollars less than its intel equivalent and there is about a 5% difference in performance.
Ledzepp9000 4 years ago
linkin park = fail
turboflame12 4 years ago
this is better like the 8800 ULTRA XXX 768MB
CASTROLGT22SUPRA 4 years ago
the viper red video car wath is the price in usa
CASTROLGT22SUPRA 4 years ago
nice card but not as good as my geforce 8800ultra oc
trasnd 4 years ago
But 2 of his card for the price of 1 of urs his is better.
gunzkevin 4 years ago
LOL my e6700 (2.67GHz X2), 2 gig corsair ram, Creative X-Fi Xtreme Gamer, evga 680i m/b, 320gig seagate hdd and a Nvidia XFX 8800GTX XXX (620mhz core) scores 11111 3D marks in 3D mark 06... that looks good on a viewsonic VX2235wm :D
shaun928 4 years ago
You can get two of his Sapphire HD2900xt for the price of an XFX 8800gtx. Also Crossfire gets mcuh better results than SLI. Last, HD2900xt is made to compete with 8800gts not the GTX or Ultra.
oscarstegland 4 years ago 2
nice machine- makes those pentium boys look like girlie men-pentium-oh pretty- you chitty- pretty chitty bang bang-we piss on you.
barryhulio 4 years ago
pentium LOL, welcome to the 21 century there are chips called the "core 2 duo" and "core 2 quad/extreme" cpus, i think the conroe cpus just smack those amd chips off the board ;P
shaun928 4 years ago
if i had your e6700(cpu) i would have better score than you beacause hd2900xt is better than 8800gts
sainopoulos 4 years ago
i agree with you it's very different from the others
sainopoulos 4 years ago
nice board, best looking board ever made!
MilfHuntah 4 years ago
oh sorry
haloandre 4 years ago
Isnt that screenshots from 3dmark 05?
haloandre 4 years ago
thanks man!i like amd too.what about your 3dmark06 score ?
sainopoulos 4 years ago
Yeah Dude. I Love You :D
AMD is the best. :)
Greetz from a german gamer (my sys: amd x2 5600+, 4 gigs ddr-667, 2x ati hd 2900xt[..])
MupL0 4 years ago 2
I disagre with you.I like it because its unique
sainopoulos 4 years ago
You have quite a nice rig, but Sapphire's PCB color sucks... jmho...
kikiam64 4 years ago
i think that two worlds is a good title because it has nice graphics and a lot of skills.
sainopoulos 4 years ago
I see Two Worlds was included. Was I the only one disappointed by that title (at least as far as the patches have come thus far)?
Ruckgesicht 4 years ago
whats the song and artist??
ish718 4 years ago
look at the and of the video to see the artist and song
sainopoulos 4 years ago
I get 9800pts in 3dMark06 with same configuration but with a X2 6000+. And as a reminder, remember DX9 is about optimization, you don't need to spell out "DX9 gaming" that hard since DX10 only optimizes data transfers and optimization of vital components. Kind of bad performance while recording too, I think you lack some drivers.
BorkaBonum 4 years ago
yes it's BF2 online
sainopoulos 4 years ago
whats the game where you fly that plane, BF2?
virtramp 4 years ago
yea the 2900xt is fantastic :)
Samulies 4 years ago
i had used 8800gts 640 but i got better experience with hd2900 so i took 2900
sainopoulos 4 years ago
Lol, you only got a better experience cause hd2900 is better than the 8800GTS. You should compare it to the 8800GTX or Ultra.
beebogroll 4 years ago
No he shouldn't, the 2900 xt was never made to compete with the 8800gtx or ultra... it was made to compete with the 8800gts and it beats the 8800gts and is close to the 8800gtx at higher resolutions.
oscarstegland 4 years ago
Right? GPU's aren't only made to compete. They're made to perform and the 2900XT comes close to even the 8800 Ultra. When they make cards, they make it as good as possible. Or who would want to buy a product that isn't at it's full potential?
beebogroll 4 years ago 2
I agree but the whole Nvidia vs. ATI debate will never end. I've always like ATI better for some reason but I'm probably getting an Nvidia if I get a new computer because HD2900xt's are harded to get wher I'm buying. But they're essentially the same products with usually around 3-4 fps difference. Doesn't really matter what brand you have as long as the card performs.
oscarstegland 4 years ago
At higher resolutions the framerate difference between Nvidia and ATI is more like 5-10. I would suggest Nvidia, cheaper cards and more power and texture abilities. For instance the 8800 GTS out performs the 2900XT in some areas and costs almost 150 $ less.
stubs13 4 years ago
You're thinking about the 8800GTS 320 mb which doesn't compare to 2900xt at all. The 640 mb 8800gts which is the one they benchmark with is more expensive than 2900xt. The 8800gts rarely outperforms 2900xt, which is what is interesting. Why would Nvidia have better texture abilities, that comes down to the graphics engine, and both cards support equal amounts of anistropic filtering+antialiasing
oscarstegland 4 years ago
You should of gotten a core 2 duo, they are alot better chips, Overclocking potential on them is insane.
Graphics is nice though, even though i would of got the 640mb gts its a personaly decission.
Samage89 4 years ago
Cool, but I'm an nVidia and Intel fanboy :)
simpsons225 4 years ago
fanboism is bad! you will buy a product even if it sucks, just because your loving the name.
keldererik 4 years ago
well its safe when ur an nVidia/intel, fanboy because you're guaranteed quality and functionality. AMD and ATi is a bit of a risk with their drivers and lack of evolving technology
BrianJensen 4 years ago
Yeah same with me i have an 8800GTS but nice vid and rig
linwoodskivins 4 years ago
christ.. am i the ounly one that just buys whats the best atm doesnt matter what brand??
virtramp 4 years ago
Yeah and nVidia and Intel are best, that's why I buy their shit. I've had bad experiences with ATI and AMD so I got my reasons not to buy their stuff.
simpsons225 4 years ago
And also the most expensive. ATi and AMD has innovations on the way favoring those who already own a AMD setup. Better to think ahead rather than trying to get that extra frame per second.
BorkaBonum 4 years ago
I use dual channel.If you see ram slots you will see 2 different colours.You can use dual channel if you put 2x1ram in the same colour
sainopoulos 4 years ago
you havent that RAM in dual channel?
Petaaa89 4 years ago