We can clearly see GC version is Better but everything dosen't depends on Graphics...........GC is now gone but ps2 Is stll in production + u'v got more games on ps2 Rather than on Game Cube(no games are made now)......So there are many factors !
Also I never understood why the gamecube was on 2 discs, missing the gangsta outfit and didn't have seperate ways. The Gamecube had more memory space than the PS2. Maybe Capcom judged it by the size of the disc because there is no other explanation.
@SNESFanboy64 The GC has more atmopshere and everything else....it's simple. Just admit the GC version is superior....I mean, it better be or else they'd be something wrong. It was MADE for that console. The water, fire and lighting truly SUCKS on the PS2 version....all the atmosphere is gone so you're left with absolute NO atmosphere whatsoever.
@CJTranceAddiction I was just talking about the look of it, the Gamecube version is far superior in terms of detail, just look at the soft and warm environments. The PS2 version looks pretty much like a re-texture mapped PS1 game. Choppy, unrealistic, incredibly low resolution detail, low poly. I mean just stop at 0:31. The persons hand on the GC version is separated beautifully with hi poly detail, the PS2 version, it's blending together in the worse fashion. Yeah, PS2 suck, but PC is Worse.
@CJTranceAddiction I Know!!! You should take a look at the PC version. It surprisingly has the worst graphics. It basically took the PS2 version and put the contrast to maximum and brightness to maximum. Now the game looks 10 times worse. You can't even tell the difference of night and afternoon, and also removed the shadowing and fog. This alone left the game with absolutely no atmosphere. The monster fight aren't thrilling at all. It might as well be a El Giante fight at fresh morning...
@CJTranceAddiction Nope. But there is a patch for the PC version that fixes all the problems. But the port is still horrendous. The controls are some of the worst I have ever encountered in a video game.
@Marioyoshiguy64 Right on dude! Gamecube version! Yeah-yuh, fuck the Xbox360, and ps3 ports. They're the exact same game, but in HD. Which doesn't make a big difference, not a big changing experience that is. I'm not paying for the same game and I know that you agree me. Well, at least I hope. XD
@blackxfire11 Why are you doing comparisons of older platform ports, to newer platform ports? I own a Ps3, but I'm not going to spend my money on the same god damn game I already have. Sorry, I'll stick with my Gamecube version, no matter of its lower pixels. How's he sick for not caring of the resolution? 240p, 360p, 480p, 1080p, who gives a fuck? Kid, graphics, or resolution doesn't matter on a game. It's the gameplay and for a bonus, the story.
@BipolarYogi e_e You know... This version have better graphics.. You can't believe me, but is the truth, e_e do a comparisons of Re: Code Veronica X (PS2) and Re: Code Veronica X (Xbox360 & PS3) and like Krustaceox... Keep talking to yourself Kid :D
@blackxfire11 I never stated that "It didn't have better graphics". What I'm informing is, "it doesn't matter about the graphical appearance of a game". Of course it looks better, it's 1080p. but still "I don't give a fuck". I'm not paying for the same game twice, although it's HD. Apparently, you can't comprehend anything that I'm informing you. Kid, it's the same game, except in "HD". Listen to Marioyoshiguy64, you'll learn something. As Resident evil C.V.X, I'll stick with the Gamecube.
@blackxfire11 Yeah, you told me that about a hundred times. Apparently, you can't debate that well. Who cares if it's got better resolution? If you want to do comparisons, then go compare the Xbox360 and Ps3 ports. Like I've stated before, "I'll stick with my Gamecube versions and you go play your HD ports". Simple as that, the argument is over. I'm blocking your five year old ass and any message that you attempt to send me. "Will be deleted". Good day, and enjoy the "same" game in HD.
@Marioyoshiguy64 Look... You want to play Resident Evil 4 with 240p,480p... or You want to play Resident Evil 4 With 1080p a xbox 360 and PS3 Resolution.. if you say with 240p and 480p... You are sick -_-
@Marioyoshiguy64 The ps2 version can go suck. The wii and gamecube is the best, But The experience to play Resident Evil 4 in xbox 360 and PS3 is much better. is the best version.
@Marioyoshiguy64 Well, no. But, is better let's play Resident Evil 4 with better resolution and with the wii graphics. i don't want to play with 240p -_- the experience of the game is better in 1080p
@Marioyoshiguy64 The Xbox 360 and PS3 Have the gamecube and wii graphics, with a 1080p Resolution, and Hud HD :) Is the best version of Resident Evil 4 ^^ and.. you say that because you don't have xbox 360 or PS3 LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLO :P
Other than loading, graphics etc etc. I think the playstation controller made it easier to play than using the Gamecube. That or I need a new Gamecube controller.
I gotta say, the game was made to GC, so your shitty ass PS2 version can go to hell, only better thing in it is the uber cool chainsaw controller, but thats it. :D
@WaNFaHmi09 Well PS2 is much better as a console than NGC, granted, but not becouse it sells more, its becouse it has insane fucking library of games to play, but the NGC version of Resident Evil 4 is still better than the PS2 counterpart, i really wouldnt buy consoles as for how popular they are if i was you, i mean, if 10,000 sheeps jump from a cliff would you do that also? ^^
@BipolarYogi I agree that the GC have better graphics...but to sapm 6 comments in a row saying " is better, read my comment, hey read my comment, hey read my comment..." you sound pathetic sorry.
@TheKrustaceox Apparently, you're too closed mind to understand the reason why I want those few people to read my statement of the Gamecube. Why? The comment was "referring" to few people that I was informing to read it, because I didn't feel typing the same message "over". Therefore, I'm not Pathetic. I just wanted to get statement to "all" of them. As for you, you're just an idiot. Sorry.
@TheKrustaceox Then all is well. Fellow youtube user with an intelligence of a "goldfish". Be free moron, troll as many as your heart desires! Many your journey be idiotic!
@TheKrustaceox Keep talking to yourself? You can't "talk" in a typed statement. So, don't you mean, "keep typing to yourself"? Eh, either way you're an idiot.
@spontanous91151 Actually, you're incorrect, because the "Gamecube" is alot more superior to the "Playstation2". I recommend for you to research the "specs" of both platforms, but look on the bright side; at least the "Ps3" is stonger than the "Wii". The "Ps2" port has terrible lightning and textures; not to mention it couldn't display many enemys at once. The only upper hand that "Ps2" has is, that it can perform more polygons. Also, the "Ps2" port took longer to load.
I heard that the gamecube graphics is better than the PS2. But with the lack of space and processor speed to create detailed graphics, made the PS2 look like it has better graphics. That's what I've heard.
@MrGamer1992 GC had way more RAM than the PS2 and was using more advanced tech in that respect at the time. I don't know how that affects graphics. Here is my 2 cents: PS2 was less powerful, but it had more graphic-heavy games developed for it, so it got to show off more. GC didn't have as many games, & thus not as much opportunity to show off it's superior graphics ability.
@TDcool1000 Just like BloodLegend said: "The ps2 was the least powerful console last gen...accept it...PS2 was the best console...however it had the worst graphic capabilities."
@This0is0pointless according to a lot of fans, yes, but most of the fans only focus on graphics, and dont focus on the other details, like, the movement or control, also, i have the gamecube version of this game, and let me tell you, i really enjoy it =3
I posted as another person before, I didn't see it wasn't me logged in.
N64 memory wasn't dual channel mode, and it worked not with 16 nor 12-bit but just 8-bit, in fact N64 memory wasn't big deal, Nintendo used Rdram that time for design and heat-sinking issues.
3.2gbs, 2.7gb/s?, don't know the numbers too, what I know is that programmers relied on higher bandwidth to work around cache and memory size limitations PS2 had, and since PS2 games looks good (excluding ports) so it's gotta be true
What a silly and pointless argument. I own both consoles, as well as all the latest ones. Each has exclusives that, to me, make each worth owning. While you need a PS2 to play Metal Gear Solid 3, you needed a Gamecube or a Wii to play Zelda Twilight Princess. Two games that any gamer worth his or her salt would want to play...so no console can "own" another.
@GhibliFan1 We all have our opinions. I say the PS2 "owns" the gamecube because I personally think the games Gamecube has to offer are crap. I have the right to express my opinion, do I not?
Yes, but I still hold that it is silly and pointless....as would it be if I countered that the Gamecube "owned" PS2 (which I'm not saying, not least because words like "owned" are not becoming of a man of mature years). Zelda Twilight Princess, Super Mario Sunshine, MGS The Twin Snakes....to name but three, were as defining of that era of hardware as Ico, Shadow of the Colossus and MGS 2 and 3. Personal choice in games make that no less a relevant statement.
@GhibliFan1 It is dumb I guess...But what can we do about it? These "console wars" stared in the 1970s and have been continuing up to date. The person who is ignorant stays ignorant I guess...
The GC version simply pwns the PS2 version in sound, graphics, lighting. It's not even close. The PS2 has some additional features but that's about it.
@aldrum420 actually the gamecube has a way better processor than the ps2 and a better video card. The problem is that it does't have the dvd rom that the ps2 has, that's it.
I have played 3 versions of resident evil 4(wii,GC,PS2) and obviously the wii was superior than the other 2.I still think to this day re4 on gamecube is better because i remember when i got it in april of 2005 and it was the most impressive looking game i have seen,Ps2 was the inferior compare to the other 2 i mention but it was playable and the graphics on re4 for ps2 was still some of the best the console could put on it had minor problems like sound and textures still look identical to gc ver
playstation has a more detailed women and trees,though the gamecube is more sharper,but the ps2 wins hands down for:handcannon,prl laser cannon and seperate ways mode,but gamecube is good anyways
And even if Gamecube has some better graphics i enjoy the PS2 version the most. Maybe because of the controls. Not sure of why. And actually some PS2 textures are better than the GC version.
But overall , the GC version is better graphically.
Not really much of a difference, the Ps2 version looks grittier and darker, for all we know it was a design decision to make it that way.
But, of course Gamecube fanboys needed something to grab on to, so they picked this, and now this great game is overshadowed by the retarded Graphics discussion.
@XcXtrippyXcX Well that`s true, but this video had a poor comparison, making them look the same...but real comparisons show the differences, special effects, lighting, water, and a darker atmosfere everything looks better on GC, but the game still is very enjoyable on PS2, alongside with extras modes and personally a better controller (PS2).
@XcXtrippyXcX Excatly, there's almost no difference, considering the fact it was ported from GC. If it'd be made for PS2 separately, I'd look better. Was proved many times by games like Gran Turismo 4, Final Fantasy XII and such, end of the subject.
I thought it was well known that Gamecube had superior graphics to the Ps2? It was one of the marketing strategies that Nintendo used. How is this shocking?
Playstation 2 is the best system ever made. Mhm, I said it.
@sonicadv27 The gamecube is brighter correct, but also has better controls and more details left out in the ps2. I bought the ps2 ver. and missed out on the GC beauty
@KickAssNTakeNames i think the only thing the GC version is better in on the special effects, all the rest is better on the ps2...
i mean seriously, Gamecube rocks, but really, people have this crazy obsession with GC game versions... "oh the Gc versions are the best, duuuuude!"
Besides, i don't understand how can the GC version of this be superior in terms of controls... Is there any difference at all aside from the controller?
@sonicadv27 the gamecube version looked way better..This video is in low res..It doesnt show that much..The gamecube controller is better too..For this game anyway..
@BlooLegend way better in what? this video totally shows how inferior the textures are comparing to PS2, and that's a fact.
I personally can't get this GC fanboyism, even with a fucking video showing how the ps2 owns the GC in terms of graphics you guys still don't back off... lol THe GC rocks, man, but heck, the only thing the GC version owns the ps2 version is on the special effects, which really looks awesome on the GC, and a bit lame on the ps2...
@sonicadv27 bro the gamecube is more powerful than the ps2 and this video isnt fact bro its not hi res... The ps2 was the least powerful console last gen...accept it...PS2 was the best console...however it had the worst graphic capabilities
@BlooLegend i accept all that, except the thing that GC Resi 4 has better graphics than ps2's, because it doesn't... The wii version sure... the Gc no.
@BlooLegend Gamecube may have slightly better graphics on this game, however PS2 has some games with graphics that are far superior than any game cube game. Like shadow of colossus , god of war, black, or gran turismo 4. Plus gamecube doesn't even have half the games that the PS2 does.
@YuchanSaurusRex Meh It does have REALLY good looking games..But Metroid Prime..That's hard to beat..Graphics anyway..PS2 is the BETTER console but RE4 Looks better on GC thats what I was saying
@BlooLegend Man you're contradictory: PS2 got the best processor of all 3 since it was based on MIPS, and Graphic Shyntetizer got more Pixel pipelines than Xbox's Geforce and 2x the ones in GC Ati's, and was the only one real customizable VGA of 128-bit era bringing whole conferences just to learn how to best use it's resources. Why RE4 looks better on GC, it was made for GC and converted for PS2 last minute for Nintendo feared short sales on a low-going popularity GC.
PS2's processor was a pain in the ass, just a 16kb cache, and the vector units were tough to work on.
The PS2's GPU had 16 pixel pipelines yes, but only one texture per pass, it has to do eight passes for what the GC and Xbox can do in one pass, it means the code has to be too parallel to really do work well.
The GC and Xbox can handle a lot better lightning and effects also.
The PS2's memory is VERY slow to access for the most part compared to the GC and Xbox also.
@Usul573 PS2 cache uses a burst 8-way data path, it's a way faster than 2-way DP GCs and Xboxs cache had, GPU uses the same cache buffer so it's faster as well.
If you're talking about RAM, fine PS2 Rdram may be not that faster comparing to DDRam, but it's still certainly not slower.
Working with PS2 V0 and V1 are indeed hard, but consoles games aren't mean to be easy to made, that's what differs them from PC games. (most specifically from object-oriented lang. based games)
@Usul573 ok, keeping on: GC and Xbox GPU can do more precise HDR effects contrasts and all, and
they both owns more Vram, in fact doing HDR effects in PS2 is a pain, but PS2 GPU offers enough maneuver for working it around. The result: you get bright looking games as Everyone's golf Fore, nice HDR effects as seen on MGS3 and high res textures as those on GT4. you can't take milk from stones if stones don't have it.
@Usul573 ...finally, you just DON'T point your finger to that poor port that is RE4 and pretend to say that's all PS2 got, because everybody knows it's not true, even RE: Outbreak is better example than this one.
And please, don't bring Xbox1 to CPU talk, this guy uses a cheap stock intel Cisc processor, which is rather sad...
Yes, one port is not to be pointed at for absolute proof of a system.
Yes, console games aren't supposed to be easy to make, like Naughty Dog said.
I'm not sure about burst 8-way data path cache, but It sounded like from the calculations Factor 5 did, the GC's CPU could do as much as PS2's main CPU and V0, and then some, and that everything in V1 is built into the graphics chip.
RDRAM is similar to the ram the N64 had, slow to access, right?
GC and Xbox have texture compression for free, PS2 could do it but with a performance hit sounds like.
It's darn complicated but it does seem that it's pretty accepted out there that the GC and Xbox could do more than the PS2, but the systems are very different and if they knew what they were doing on the PS2 and really did hard work, they could certainly do magic. I love PS2 also make no mistake. It just KILLED the other two for sales.
@Usul573 Now that's interesting, I don't know if PS2 and N64 Rdram were the same, but PS2 is dual channeled @ 800mhz (2x 400mhz) which makes it theoretically faster than any other machine by the time, except it uses 32-bit data rate (2x 16-bit) while GC and Xbox uses 64-bit DDram, so they're pretty even.
Rambus (brand that made Rdram) also made Ps3 Xdram, which redraw the same path as PS2's : more clock and less bit-rate.
It's......most of the PS2 memory is at 3.2 GBs, GC main memory is 2.7 GBs, Xbox memory is 6.4 GBs, can't say for sure the MHz though. Apparently the PS2 memory is quite slow to access like the N64 though, while the GC's memory is very fast to access and the Xbox memory is pretty fast.
Memory works differently in each system though so it's a little hard to figure out.
N64 memory was 500 MBs, 4 MBs of memory, I wonder if the access latency is just like the PS2's memory.
Then apparently the PS3's XDR memory at 25.6 GBs has extremely fast latency.
I also wonder what the PS2 and GC having some dedicated graphics memory was like compared to the Xbox not having any dedicated graphics memory. The dedicated memory looks quite fast.
The PS2's VRAM is on a 2560-bit, with three separate buses. 48 GBs total.
@paulomuniruequed compare Splinter Cell Chaos Theory PS2 and Xbox, compare just cause, star wars batlefront, 2, black, burnout revenge, tomb raider, the texures and lighting effects are always much better in the xbox, where bo and black tomb raider, xbox1 version runs at 60 fps, and the ps2 at 30 fps, and the textures and lighting effects are better on xbox, 90% of the games were more beautiful in xbox1, and in many cases the difference graphically, in favor of the xbox was enormous.
@TheFred128 You can't compare multi plataform and ports because PS2 loses on Xbox field: numbers, quantity, etc.
Instead you got to compare two exclusives and then see why a machine with so less memory and clock can do so well comparing with a stuffed one like xbox.
@SisAPeres Most games were madebased on the PS2 and then ported to xbox1, the xbox had better graphics in general because he was more powerful video card etc. and was able to do effects that the PS2 was not capable of doing.
game cube haves better texture than ps2 and way better first party games
Danieldx22 1 month ago
PS2 wins!!!
Machonima 1 month ago
@Machonima fanboy :)
LucasAFCosta 5 days ago
Gamecube looks better.
dandanwii 1 month ago
Game Cube Wins!
wiinterectionBR 2 months ago
heey acaa heyyy acaa mierda mierdaa hahahaha
comandante17r 3 months ago
We can clearly see GC version is Better but everything dosen't depends on Graphics...........GC is now gone but ps2 Is stll in production + u'v got more games on ps2 Rather than on Game Cube(no games are made now)......So there are many factors !
rohan1067 3 months ago
i actually think ps2 looks way better
1GeneralChiken 3 months ago
Also I never understood why the gamecube was on 2 discs, missing the gangsta outfit and didn't have seperate ways. The Gamecube had more memory space than the PS2. Maybe Capcom judged it by the size of the disc because there is no other explanation.
MarshiMYG64 3 months ago
@MarshiMYG64 actually no, the gamecube discs hold about 1.8 GB while the PS2 discs hold 4.7.
noideac 3 months ago
@noideac I stand corrected.
MarshiMYG64 3 months ago
Go play on your PS3 and Xbox 360 you graphics whores. Gamecube is the best.
MarshiMYG64 3 months ago
ps1 has better graphics than xbox 360 and wii
ValdemarDragunov 4 months ago
Wii wins by default.
DrRumstain 4 months ago
mi ps3 version is best
tkd096 4 months ago
jaja, i have the ps3 hd version, that is superior
tkd096 4 months ago
@tkd096 well so do i, but i like the gamecube version just as equal
tapion567 4 months ago
@tkd096 i prefer the gamecube version
tanos1998 3 months ago
I have a feeling that the PS2 version has more atmosphere. Just, it's darker with foggier graphics. But Gamecube is cleaner.
SNESFanboy64 4 months ago
@SNESFanboy64 The GC has more atmopshere and everything else....it's simple. Just admit the GC version is superior....I mean, it better be or else they'd be something wrong. It was MADE for that console. The water, fire and lighting truly SUCKS on the PS2 version....all the atmosphere is gone so you're left with absolute NO atmosphere whatsoever.
CJTranceAddiction 4 months ago
@CJTranceAddiction I was just talking about the look of it, the Gamecube version is far superior in terms of detail, just look at the soft and warm environments. The PS2 version looks pretty much like a re-texture mapped PS1 game. Choppy, unrealistic, incredibly low resolution detail, low poly. I mean just stop at 0:31. The persons hand on the GC version is separated beautifully with hi poly detail, the PS2 version, it's blending together in the worse fashion. Yeah, PS2 suck, but PC is Worse.
SNESFanboy64 4 months ago
@SNESFanboy64 Exactly!!!
CJTranceAddiction 3 months ago
@CJTranceAddiction I Know!!! You should take a look at the PC version. It surprisingly has the worst graphics. It basically took the PS2 version and put the contrast to maximum and brightness to maximum. Now the game looks 10 times worse. You can't even tell the difference of night and afternoon, and also removed the shadowing and fog. This alone left the game with absolutely no atmosphere. The monster fight aren't thrilling at all. It might as well be a El Giante fight at fresh morning...
SNESFanboy64 3 months ago
@SNESFanboy64 Couldn't you just turn the brightness down and increase the dark tones???
CJTranceAddiction 3 months ago
@CJTranceAddiction Nope. But there is a patch for the PC version that fixes all the problems. But the port is still horrendous. The controls are some of the worst I have ever encountered in a video game.
SNESFanboy64 3 months ago
Comment removed
SNESFanboy64 4 months ago
The xbox 360 version have better graphics :P
blackxfire11 4 months ago
I played this game in PS2 version, i never played the GC, but I would like to play it! Shit RE 0 RE 1 and this...
RocknrollinaD 4 months ago
childish...
Rockrule6666 4 months ago
Gamecube all day
residentevil54460 4 months ago
@Marioyoshiguy64 Right on dude! Gamecube version! Yeah-yuh, fuck the Xbox360, and ps3 ports. They're the exact same game, but in HD. Which doesn't make a big difference, not a big changing experience that is. I'm not paying for the same game and I know that you agree me. Well, at least I hope. XD
BipolarYogi 5 months ago
ps2 win
hyemn 5 months ago
@Marioyoshiguy64 Yeah yeah, of course boss, anything you say. go and play re 4 in your ps2 with 240p n_n
blackxfire11 5 months ago
@blackxfire11 Why are you doing comparisons of older platform ports, to newer platform ports? I own a Ps3, but I'm not going to spend my money on the same god damn game I already have. Sorry, I'll stick with my Gamecube version, no matter of its lower pixels. How's he sick for not caring of the resolution? 240p, 360p, 480p, 1080p, who gives a fuck? Kid, graphics, or resolution doesn't matter on a game. It's the gameplay and for a bonus, the story.
BipolarYogi 5 months ago
@BipolarYogi e_e You know... This version have better graphics.. You can't believe me, but is the truth, e_e do a comparisons of Re: Code Veronica X (PS2) and Re: Code Veronica X (Xbox360 & PS3) and like Krustaceox... Keep talking to yourself Kid :D
blackxfire11 5 months ago
@blackxfire11 I never stated that "It didn't have better graphics". What I'm informing is, "it doesn't matter about the graphical appearance of a game". Of course it looks better, it's 1080p. but still "I don't give a fuck". I'm not paying for the same game twice, although it's HD. Apparently, you can't comprehend anything that I'm informing you. Kid, it's the same game, except in "HD". Listen to Marioyoshiguy64, you'll learn something. As Resident evil C.V.X, I'll stick with the Gamecube.
BipolarYogi 5 months ago
@BipolarYogi XD but.. the best re 4 is the xbox 360 and ps3 version. :D
blackxfire11 5 months ago
@blackxfire11 Yeah, you told me that about a hundred times. Apparently, you can't debate that well. Who cares if it's got better resolution? If you want to do comparisons, then go compare the Xbox360 and Ps3 ports. Like I've stated before, "I'll stick with my Gamecube versions and you go play your HD ports". Simple as that, the argument is over. I'm blocking your five year old ass and any message that you attempt to send me. "Will be deleted". Good day, and enjoy the "same" game in HD.
BipolarYogi 5 months ago
@blackxfire11
you must be talking about RE5. The 4th HD remake doesnt come out for another while
supercell1995 4 months ago
@Marioyoshiguy64 240p and 480p becauso yo don't have xbox 360 and ps3 :B
blackxfire11 5 months ago
@Marioyoshiguy64 Look... You want to play Resident Evil 4 with 240p,480p... or You want to play Resident Evil 4 With 1080p a xbox 360 and PS3 Resolution.. if you say with 240p and 480p... You are sick -_-
blackxfire11 5 months ago
@Marioyoshiguy64 BUT IS BETTER THAN OF THE PS2 AND GAMECUBE >:(
blackxfire11 5 months ago
@Marioyoshiguy64 I KNOW! But is best with better graphics -.-
blackxfire11 5 months ago
@Marioyoshiguy64 The ps2 version can go suck. The wii and gamecube is the best, But The experience to play Resident Evil 4 in xbox 360 and PS3 is much better. is the best version.
blackxfire11 5 months ago
@Marioyoshiguy64 Wii is 480p i know, but gamecube is 260p, XBOX 360 AND PS3 1080p FUCK YEAH! :D
blackxfire11 5 months ago
@Marioyoshiguy64 Well, no. But, is better let's play Resident Evil 4 with better resolution and with the wii graphics. i don't want to play with 240p -_- the experience of the game is better in 1080p
blackxfire11 5 months ago
@Marioyoshiguy64 Of course anything you say! :)
blackxfire11 5 months ago
@Marioyoshiguy64 The Xbox 360 and PS3 Have the gamecube and wii graphics, with a 1080p Resolution, and Hud HD :) Is the best version of Resident Evil 4 ^^ and.. you say that because you don't have xbox 360 or PS3 LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLO :P
blackxfire11 5 months ago
@blackxfire11
yo're braindamaged, my friend
paYwalkSSoH 4 months ago
Play Station 2 all day
6r0an89 6 months ago
Xbox 360 and PS3 ^.^
blackxfire11 6 months ago
I played and beat game on both systems.. Damn I didnot think the difference was this much.. GC version rules
dzilla1991 6 months ago
Other than loading, graphics etc etc. I think the playstation controller made it easier to play than using the Gamecube. That or I need a new Gamecube controller.
Jdog5785 6 months ago
GameCube or Playstation 2, it's still Resident Evil 4 at heart.
IlikeFoodnDrink 6 months ago
Lol ps2 has gta series and gamecube has mario. I had a ps2 long time ago now i just bought gamecube 3 days ago and i think its much better.
recon205 6 months ago
I gotta say, the game was made to GC, so your shitty ass PS2 version can go to hell, only better thing in it is the uber cool chainsaw controller, but thats it. :D
oskulock 6 months ago 4
@oskulock the ps2 version is shitty? oh yeah thats why its on one disc and has shitloads of extra content. your gamecube version can go to hell
dethronethesonofgod 6 months ago
@dethronethesonofgod Yeah but the thing is, no. :D
oskulock 6 months ago
@oskulock I wouldn't call the PS2 version shitty.
who cares if the graphics aren't as good on PS2 version?
it doesn't really matter, a true gamer knows graphics don't matter.
legorocks3 6 months ago
@legorocks3 Lol who said anything about graphics? Read my comment better next time. -.-
oskulock 6 months ago
@oskulock accept that ps2 sells better . :)
WaNFaHmi09 1 month ago
@WaNFaHmi09 So? If a console sells better than another it means its better than anything? Your argument is invalid.
oskulock 1 month ago
@oskulock can you tell me why people buy ps2 ? i like ps2 .. and i like wii ..
i choose the console that fun to play and sells better than the other
WaNFaHmi09 1 month ago
@WaNFaHmi09 Well PS2 is much better as a console than NGC, granted, but not becouse it sells more, its becouse it has insane fucking library of games to play, but the NGC version of Resident Evil 4 is still better than the PS2 counterpart, i really wouldnt buy consoles as for how popular they are if i was you, i mean, if 10,000 sheeps jump from a cliff would you do that also? ^^
oskulock 1 month ago
@oskulock so stop calling ps2 shitty ass ^__^
we're talking about game consoles , not sheeps .
WaNFaHmi09 1 month ago
@WaNFaHmi09 "PS2 Version" I hope you are able to read. >_>
oskulock 1 month ago
@oskulock -_____-'
WaNFaHmi09 1 month ago
ps2 RULES!!
amaury920 6 months ago
@amaury920 What I informed spontaneous99151, goes for you. .
BipolarYogi 6 months ago
ps2 version is waaay better.. and it got alot of cool exstra stuff and missions.. i recommend the ps2 version to anyone.
boss2650 6 months ago
@boss2650 Read and weep. ↓
BipolarYogi 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@BipolarYogi blah blah blah.. you are all talk and no brain. now YOU can go weep.
boss2650 6 months ago
@BipolarYogi I agree that the GC have better graphics...but to sapm 6 comments in a row saying " is better, read my comment, hey read my comment, hey read my comment..." you sound pathetic sorry.
TheKrustaceox 5 months ago
@TheKrustaceox Apparently, you're too closed mind to understand the reason why I want those few people to read my statement of the Gamecube. Why? The comment was "referring" to few people that I was informing to read it, because I didn't feel typing the same message "over". Therefore, I'm not Pathetic. I just wanted to get statement to "all" of them. As for you, you're just an idiot. Sorry.
BipolarYogi 5 months ago
@BipolarYogi Ok pathetic 6 spamer, bye ;)
TheKrustaceox 5 months ago
@TheKrustaceox Then all is well. Fellow youtube user with an intelligence of a "goldfish". Be free moron, troll as many as your heart desires! Many your journey be idiotic!
BipolarYogi 5 months ago
@BipolarYogi May*
BipolarYogi 5 months ago
@BipolarYogi keep talking to yourself ;)
TheKrustaceox 5 months ago 4
@TheKrustaceox Keep talking to yourself? You can't "talk" in a typed statement. So, don't you mean, "keep typing to yourself"? Eh, either way you're an idiot.
BipolarYogi 5 months ago
HEYYYY AGAAAARRRR
thebigbookoflife 6 months ago
ps2 is better just because of the graphic
spontanous91151 7 months ago
@spontanous91151 Actually, you're incorrect, because the "Gamecube" is alot more superior to the "Playstation2". I recommend for you to research the "specs" of both platforms, but look on the bright side; at least the "Ps3" is stonger than the "Wii". The "Ps2" port has terrible lightning and textures; not to mention it couldn't display many enemys at once. The only upper hand that "Ps2" has is, that it can perform more polygons. Also, the "Ps2" port took longer to load.
BipolarYogi 6 months ago
@BipolarYogi i love sony but i have to agree with you. i like the ps2 one better but gc owns in graphics
SonyFanboy92 6 months ago
@BipolarYogi oh ok
spontanous91151 5 months ago
did anyone fail to even glance at the tree bark at the end of the video? look at that pixel mess on the gamecube.
5324er 7 months ago
I heard that the gamecube graphics is better than the PS2. But with the lack of space and processor speed to create detailed graphics, made the PS2 look like it has better graphics. That's what I've heard.
MrGamer1992 7 months ago
@MrGamer1992 GC had way more RAM than the PS2 and was using more advanced tech in that respect at the time. I don't know how that affects graphics. Here is my 2 cents: PS2 was less powerful, but it had more graphic-heavy games developed for it, so it got to show off more. GC didn't have as many games, & thus not as much opportunity to show off it's superior graphics ability.
TokedStokedMusic 7 months ago
@TokedStokedMusic I agree!
BipolarYogi 6 months ago
Gamecube wins anyday.
TheRoyce1999 7 months ago
playstation 2 is better
TDcool1000 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TDcool1000 Just like BloodLegend said: "The ps2 was the least powerful console last gen...accept it...PS2 was the best console...however it had the worst graphic capabilities."
kylehyde28 7 months ago
ps2 es lo mejor le gana en graficos hasta a el wii
eiserick 7 months ago
PS2 forever....
ruben3nemesis 8 months ago
thumbs up if gc is better and ada is sexy so is ashley
shayan366 8 months ago
hmm, i hate Playstation for just 1 thing..... Too Much Football, but! in fact is a good console and have a lots of good games,
goldensun003 8 months ago
Gamecube;)
JProductionsSV 8 months ago
ps2 or GC
you had to PLAY THIS GAME
SonofRa47 8 months ago
are the graphics the only difference?
This0is0pointless 9 months ago
@This0is0pointless no ps2 has some extra stuff
tallyhoman911 9 months ago
@This0is0pointless according to a lot of fans, yes, but most of the fans only focus on graphics, and dont focus on the other details, like, the movement or control, also, i have the gamecube version of this game, and let me tell you, i really enjoy it =3
TeamInTheDarkness 8 months ago
I posted as another person before, I didn't see it wasn't me logged in.
N64 memory wasn't dual channel mode, and it worked not with 16 nor 12-bit but just 8-bit, in fact N64 memory wasn't big deal, Nintendo used Rdram that time for design and heat-sinking issues.
3.2gbs, 2.7gb/s?, don't know the numbers too, what I know is that programmers relied on higher bandwidth to work around cache and memory size limitations PS2 had, and since PS2 games looks good (excluding ports) so it's gotta be true
paulomuniruequed 9 months ago
Gamecube shits on the PS2. I mean really.
BudzMcgr33n 9 months ago
PS2 Is the best! >:)
Danuchiha90 9 months ago
Ps2 may have not had the graphics to combat against GC, BUT! Did GC have any of the minigames? Not really
lethalbullet1 9 months ago
noob
gc win
pablojugg 9 months ago
u guys ddnt notice the texture difference on the ps2???
CurlyisconfusedXD 9 months ago
its a fake
elsrdelpixel 11 months ago
ps2 its much better about this........gamecube
TheSuperwebshow 11 months ago
gamecube was such an amazing console I don't know how the hell did ps2 was popular
cartoon2337 11 months ago
@cartoon2337 Ps2 had all the kick ass games
Anime4eva24 11 months ago
@cartoon2337
PS2 came out a year earlier and had the massive fanbase from the PS1 which killed the N64 for sales. Good third party support I guess.
Usul573 11 months ago
Playstation 2 OWNS game cube any day.
Scarh1fiend345 11 months ago
@Scarh1fiend345
What a silly and pointless argument. I own both consoles, as well as all the latest ones. Each has exclusives that, to me, make each worth owning. While you need a PS2 to play Metal Gear Solid 3, you needed a Gamecube or a Wii to play Zelda Twilight Princess. Two games that any gamer worth his or her salt would want to play...so no console can "own" another.
GhibliFan1 11 months ago
@GhibliFan1 We all have our opinions. I say the PS2 "owns" the gamecube because I personally think the games Gamecube has to offer are crap. I have the right to express my opinion, do I not?
Scarh1fiend345 11 months ago
@Scarh1fiend345
Yes, but I still hold that it is silly and pointless....as would it be if I countered that the Gamecube "owned" PS2 (which I'm not saying, not least because words like "owned" are not becoming of a man of mature years). Zelda Twilight Princess, Super Mario Sunshine, MGS The Twin Snakes....to name but three, were as defining of that era of hardware as Ico, Shadow of the Colossus and MGS 2 and 3. Personal choice in games make that no less a relevant statement.
GhibliFan1 11 months ago
@GhibliFan1 It is dumb I guess...But what can we do about it? These "console wars" stared in the 1970s and have been continuing up to date. The person who is ignorant stays ignorant I guess...
Scarh1fiend345 11 months ago
Does the GC have widescreen?
AstronoughtNugget 11 months ago
@AstronoughtNugget
Yeah, Cube version was full widescreen.
GhibliFan1 11 months ago
ilovit
whataquan34 11 months ago
game cube has better graphics than the wee better processer so fk yall
XxXsmok3w33d4ly420Xx 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
the gc is way better cus faster CPU and better video card and the gc has progressive scan and looks beast thumbs up
ozzyismyname2010 1 year ago
the gc is way better cus faster CPU and better video card and the gc has progressive scan and looks beast thumbs up
ozzyismyname2010 1 year ago
The GC version simply pwns the PS2 version in sound, graphics, lighting. It's not even close. The PS2 has some additional features but that's about it.
sodazman 1 year ago
Psh, the Wii wins, haha XD
Wakaboo14 1 year ago
@Wakaboo14 Nah, PS3 LOL
YuchanSaurusRex 1 year ago
@YuchanSaurusRex lol maybe if they remake Resident Evil 4 for it...I'm sure RE5 pwns anything when it comes to graphical achievements.
Wakaboo14 1 year ago
@Wakaboo14 Haha yeah
YuchanSaurusRex 1 year ago
nice! now do a ps3 - nintendo wii comparison
Foggemannen 1 year ago
the ps2 is a port of the gc ,but games like shadow of collosus ,gt4 ,mgs,black,it s imposible to run on the gc
aldrum420 1 year ago
@aldrum420 actually the gamecube has a way better processor than the ps2 and a better video card. The problem is that it does't have the dvd rom that the ps2 has, that's it.
Banditotr 1 year ago
@aldrum420
Twin Snakes is on GC.
I know at least one developer said that if the PS2 can do it, the GC can, it's at least as powerful as the PS2 in every way except for storage space.
Usul573 1 year ago
You know on the ps2 they limited it to 10 enemies at once and also the Leon model has 10,000 polygons on the gamecube and 5,000 on the ps2.
e102ewan 1 year ago
im guna go with the ps2
kenny84561 1 year ago
pero igual mi favorita tambien es la ps2
krakenoz 1 year ago
lolman digo lo mismo en la gamecube ahi algo que me atrae pero no se que jeje
krakenoz 1 year ago
my favorite console is ps2 but there's something on the gc version that i can't explain
200lolman 1 year ago
I have played 3 versions of resident evil 4(wii,GC,PS2) and obviously the wii was superior than the other 2.I still think to this day re4 on gamecube is better because i remember when i got it in april of 2005 and it was the most impressive looking game i have seen,Ps2 was the inferior compare to the other 2 i mention but it was playable and the graphics on re4 for ps2 was still some of the best the console could put on it had minor problems like sound and textures still look identical to gc ver
siegfried4245 1 year ago
playstation has a more detailed women and trees,though the gamecube is more sharper,but the ps2 wins hands down for:handcannon,prl laser cannon and seperate ways mode,but gamecube is good anyways
TheGamelover101 1 year ago
@TheGamelover101 hand cannon is on ngc.
Ngc re has water, shadows, lighting and lava efects.
GameCube has better graphics just look this video " Resident Evil 4 - Gamecube vs PS2 Graphics "
mauroap87 1 year ago
@mauroap87 HandCannon is ALSO on PS2.
And even if Gamecube has some better graphics i enjoy the PS2 version the most. Maybe because of the controls. Not sure of why. And actually some PS2 textures are better than the GC version.
But overall , the GC version is better graphically.
reggiardito 1 year ago
@ShadoVRaven1337 Actually, it was originally made for the Gamecube, infact, it was announced as a Gamecube exclusive.
SuperClassicSonic 1 year ago
Not really much of a difference, the Ps2 version looks grittier and darker, for all we know it was a design decision to make it that way.
But, of course Gamecube fanboys needed something to grab on to, so they picked this, and now this great game is overshadowed by the retarded Graphics discussion.
XcXtrippyXcX 1 year ago
@XcXtrippyXcX Well that`s true, but this video had a poor comparison, making them look the same...but real comparisons show the differences, special effects, lighting, water, and a darker atmosfere everything looks better on GC, but the game still is very enjoyable on PS2, alongside with extras modes and personally a better controller (PS2).
Mario0Dante 1 year ago
@XcXtrippyXcX Excatly, there's almost no difference, considering the fact it was ported from GC. If it'd be made for PS2 separately, I'd look better. Was proved many times by games like Gran Turismo 4, Final Fantasy XII and such, end of the subject.
ShadoVRaven1337 1 year ago
Better graphics on GC, more extras on PS2.....Still awesome on both
RBOrthopets 1 year ago
@RBOrthopets wii version is the best, GC graphics or better with the extra features and awesome controls.
btw im surprised how similar the graphics are here, tho gamecube does support 480p so...
SOUTHWESTENZ 1 year ago
I thought it was well known that Gamecube had superior graphics to the Ps2? It was one of the marketing strategies that Nintendo used. How is this shocking?
Playstation 2 is the best system ever made. Mhm, I said it.
VegasAcer 1 year ago
lol teh gamecube what?! it only has higher brightness, and in my opinion, the darker these games look, the better. so for me, thumbs up for the ps2.
stop at 0:31. you'll notice the woman's model is much more detailed for the ps2 than for the gamecube.
People have this obsession for the gamecube, i don't know know why...
sonicadv27 1 year ago
@sonicadv27 The gamecube is brighter correct, but also has better controls and more details left out in the ps2. I bought the ps2 ver. and missed out on the GC beauty
KickAssNTakeNames 1 year ago
@KickAssNTakeNames i think the only thing the GC version is better in on the special effects, all the rest is better on the ps2...
i mean seriously, Gamecube rocks, but really, people have this crazy obsession with GC game versions... "oh the Gc versions are the best, duuuuude!"
Besides, i don't understand how can the GC version of this be superior in terms of controls... Is there any difference at all aside from the controller?
sonicadv27 1 year ago
@sonicadv27 the gamecube version looked way better..This video is in low res..It doesnt show that much..The gamecube controller is better too..For this game anyway..
BlooLegend 1 year ago
@BlooLegend way better in what? this video totally shows how inferior the textures are comparing to PS2, and that's a fact.
I personally can't get this GC fanboyism, even with a fucking video showing how the ps2 owns the GC in terms of graphics you guys still don't back off... lol THe GC rocks, man, but heck, the only thing the GC version owns the ps2 version is on the special effects, which really looks awesome on the GC, and a bit lame on the ps2...
sonicadv27 1 year ago
@sonicadv27 bro the gamecube is more powerful than the ps2 and this video isnt fact bro its not hi res... The ps2 was the least powerful console last gen...accept it...PS2 was the best console...however it had the worst graphic capabilities
BlooLegend 1 year ago 22
@BlooLegend i accept all that, except the thing that GC Resi 4 has better graphics than ps2's, because it doesn't... The wii version sure... the Gc no.
sonicadv27 1 year ago
@sonicadv27 Fine I guess we agree to disagree
BlooLegend 1 year ago
@BlooLegend lol, we all have our preferences I guess
KickAssNTakeNames 1 year ago
@BlooLegend Gamecube may have slightly better graphics on this game, however PS2 has some games with graphics that are far superior than any game cube game. Like shadow of colossus , god of war, black, or gran turismo 4. Plus gamecube doesn't even have half the games that the PS2 does.
YuchanSaurusRex 1 year ago
@YuchanSaurusRex Meh It does have REALLY good looking games..But Metroid Prime..That's hard to beat..Graphics anyway..PS2 is the BETTER console but RE4 Looks better on GC thats what I was saying
BlooLegend 1 year ago
@BlooLegend you're actually very wrong,gamecube's computing power is actual a lot bigger than ps2's.
google it
spongekwstas 1 year ago
@BlooLegend Haha, I agree
& I play ps3 so it doesn't really matter to me that much anyways :P
YuchanSaurusRex 1 year ago
@BlooLegend i guess the same could be said with the wii
xdeathkidreaperx 10 months ago
@BlooLegend Man you're contradictory: PS2 got the best processor of all 3 since it was based on MIPS, and Graphic Shyntetizer got more Pixel pipelines than Xbox's Geforce and 2x the ones in GC Ati's, and was the only one real customizable VGA of 128-bit era bringing whole conferences just to learn how to best use it's resources. Why RE4 looks better on GC, it was made for GC and converted for PS2 last minute for Nintendo feared short sales on a low-going popularity GC.
paulomuniruequed 10 months ago
@paulomuniruequed Though the gamecube had better graphics =3
MrRallemulle 9 months ago
@paulomuniruequed
PS2's processor was a pain in the ass, just a 16kb cache, and the vector units were tough to work on.
The PS2's GPU had 16 pixel pipelines yes, but only one texture per pass, it has to do eight passes for what the GC and Xbox can do in one pass, it means the code has to be too parallel to really do work well.
The GC and Xbox can handle a lot better lightning and effects also.
The PS2's memory is VERY slow to access for the most part compared to the GC and Xbox also.
Usul573 9 months ago
@Usul573 PS2 cache uses a burst 8-way data path, it's a way faster than 2-way DP GCs and Xboxs cache had, GPU uses the same cache buffer so it's faster as well.
If you're talking about RAM, fine PS2 Rdram may be not that faster comparing to DDRam, but it's still certainly not slower.
Working with PS2 V0 and V1 are indeed hard, but consoles games aren't mean to be easy to made, that's what differs them from PC games. (most specifically from object-oriented lang. based games)
paulomuniruequed 9 months ago
@Usul573 ok, keeping on: GC and Xbox GPU can do more precise HDR effects contrasts and all, and
they both owns more Vram, in fact doing HDR effects in PS2 is a pain, but PS2 GPU offers enough maneuver for working it around. The result: you get bright looking games as Everyone's golf Fore, nice HDR effects as seen on MGS3 and high res textures as those on GT4. you can't take milk from stones if stones don't have it.
paulomuniruequed 9 months ago
@Usul573 ...finally, you just DON'T point your finger to that poor port that is RE4 and pretend to say that's all PS2 got, because everybody knows it's not true, even RE: Outbreak is better example than this one.
And please, don't bring Xbox1 to CPU talk, this guy uses a cheap stock intel Cisc processor, which is rather sad...
paulomuniruequed 9 months ago
@paulomuniruequed
Well, I'll say this much.
Yes, one port is not to be pointed at for absolute proof of a system.
Yes, console games aren't supposed to be easy to make, like Naughty Dog said.
I'm not sure about burst 8-way data path cache, but It sounded like from the calculations Factor 5 did, the GC's CPU could do as much as PS2's main CPU and V0, and then some, and that everything in V1 is built into the graphics chip.
RDRAM is similar to the ram the N64 had, slow to access, right?
Usul573 9 months ago
@Usul573
GC and Xbox have texture compression for free, PS2 could do it but with a performance hit sounds like.
It's darn complicated but it does seem that it's pretty accepted out there that the GC and Xbox could do more than the PS2, but the systems are very different and if they knew what they were doing on the PS2 and really did hard work, they could certainly do magic. I love PS2 also make no mistake. It just KILLED the other two for sales.
Usul573 9 months ago
@Usul573 Now that's interesting, I don't know if PS2 and N64 Rdram were the same, but PS2 is dual channeled @ 800mhz (2x 400mhz) which makes it theoretically faster than any other machine by the time, except it uses 32-bit data rate (2x 16-bit) while GC and Xbox uses 64-bit DDram, so they're pretty even.
Rambus (brand that made Rdram) also made Ps3 Xdram, which redraw the same path as PS2's : more clock and less bit-rate.
But people say it's really faster this time.
SisAPeres 9 months ago
@SisAPeres
It's......most of the PS2 memory is at 3.2 GBs, GC main memory is 2.7 GBs, Xbox memory is 6.4 GBs, can't say for sure the MHz though. Apparently the PS2 memory is quite slow to access like the N64 though, while the GC's memory is very fast to access and the Xbox memory is pretty fast.
Memory works differently in each system though so it's a little hard to figure out.
N64 memory was 500 MBs, 4 MBs of memory, I wonder if the access latency is just like the PS2's memory.
Usul573 9 months ago
Comment removed
Usul573 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Usul573
Then apparently the PS3's XDR memory at 25.6 GBs has extremely fast latency.
I also wonder what the PS2 and GC having some dedicated graphics memory was like compared to the Xbox not having any dedicated graphics memory. The dedicated memory looks quite fast.
The PS2's VRAM is on a 2560-bit, with three separate buses. 48 GBs total.
Usul573 9 months ago
@Usul573
Then the PS3's XDR is at 25.6 GBs, and very fast access latency.
I wonder how the PS2 and GC having dedicated VRAM compared to how the Xbox did it's work with no VRAM. The VRAM looks very fast.
The PS2's VRAM is on three buses, 2560-bit total. Insane. 48 GBs bandwidth.
Usul573 9 months ago
@paulomuniruequed compare Splinter Cell Chaos Theory PS2 and Xbox, compare just cause, star wars batlefront, 2, black, burnout revenge, tomb raider, the texures and lighting effects are always much better in the xbox, where bo and black tomb raider, xbox1 version runs at 60 fps, and the ps2 at 30 fps, and the textures and lighting effects are better on xbox, 90% of the games were more beautiful in xbox1, and in many cases the difference graphically, in favor of the xbox was enormous.
TheFred128 9 months ago
@TheFred128 You can't compare multi plataform and ports because PS2 loses on Xbox field: numbers, quantity, etc.
Instead you got to compare two exclusives and then see why a machine with so less memory and clock can do so well comparing with a stuffed one like xbox.
It's technology not just numbers.
SisAPeres 9 months ago
@SisAPeres Most games were madebased on the PS2 and then ported to xbox1, the xbox had better graphics in general because he was more powerful video card etc. and was able to do effects that the PS2 was not capable of doing.