Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)
Link to this comment:
Share to:
Loading...
- Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
or sign in to load a different list.
Loading...Saving...
John R. Christy has been accused of recanting his position that climate change is neither Anthropogenic nor Catastrophic, but he didn’t. He used two independent data sets, weather balloon and satellite. (see links in my about me) Later he only stated that there was some anthropogenic impact that could not be predicted 100 years out, but that what we’re doing was good for the plants.
Angellicationify 1 year ago
Food prices goingup ah..........imagie what "cap and trade" would do........and what has ethanol done to food prices already........
Ethanol forms carbon dioxide also......
Burning ethanol creates more ozone than gasoline.........................
bfpccbm 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
LOL! What a FRAUD. What if? What if? Just toss out the historic record and the vast warming, CO2, and scientific generalizations. Computer models are GOD! We imput whatever data we wanted and got these scary outputs. Why wait for real climate data when we can regulate your whole life and destroy the enomony right now.
BeanGene 2 years ago
The vast majority of Shlesinger's argument is based on model output, and not on reality. Why doesn't he show historical to today graphics so we can see what the reality has been in the last x number of years?
Replicant9900 2 years ago