Robin Van Persie Goal or No Goal

[TheGazFull]

the commentator of fifa 98 n64 xD

[bekimufc]

KURCINA



[YounghomieGL]

GOAL



[semoution]

best attacker in the world 3>

[TheKakReality]

WTF It's Goal!!!!

[StridentCorn90]

That was clearly a goal the ref is crazy!!

[Joricky12]

How is this not a goal? There is no rule against it. the goalkeeper did not have the ball in his hands.

[Tube8Fei]

Wel done RVP Copy from Legend Thierry Henry...

[ryangva]

only a dirty arsenal player would try something like this. what is that saying again? oh yeah arsenal always cheating

[lalwhyumad]

@ryangva Ronaldinho once did the same and that one did counted so we're measuring with two different standards :/

[juiceey14]

@ryangva lol, you're obviously an arsenal hater. So many other players have done this, but you have to point out the most irrelevant thing. dumbass

[rtownz251251]

This is a 100% correct goal!

[redheadni]

what a goal! LOL

[JAKAPERDANA]

only RVP can do this

[appie101009]

Duuhhh it's 100% a goal. The bal was in the air:S

[sd619brian]

It's like when the goalie bounces he ball he still has it in his possession so why not throwing it up to kick it

[hundui]

Im a yid and proud!

As much as i hate The Woolwich boys, that was a goal, no doubt !

[Darmorish]

Goal should've scored. The ball was in the air.

[shirleyian10]

I laughed...

[runescapeFAification]

i love v persie but that was no goal :)

[JamieLandan]

172% goal according to scientists.

[aditisawesome1]

like a boss

[JAM1LD3R]

Goalie is an idiot, but it was no goal cos he stopped the ball in the penalty area

[DjGa3tano]

The goalies fault if he decides to kick it right infront of him..

[sab10ful]

was been given then?

[imzy32]

come on ref that was a goal i dont care

[collster01]

This doesn't count, but Nani's goal did for Manchester Utd :L

[Fishman0316]

@collster01 Nani is a cheating scumbag

[markgazeley15]

van:why because i could do this on fifa ref:i have never played ifa

[WeDoWhatWeWant20]

Look at the empty seats........

[EthanQuinn1811]

Fuk me goal

[Jungelpojke]

its a goal

[Verserkerd1]

absolutely goal

[MrKmaster2000]

GOAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WHAT DO YOU THINK

[chrism216]

is this legal? and i mean someone who is informed about official FIFA rules and not some dumb redneck who thinks he knows about football.

i tried this once, i headed the ball away from the keeper while he was bouncing it but the referee called a foul. it was on a lower league though, and i always wondered what the actual rule says.

[missonihill]

@chrism216 No. Not a goal, since the goal kick that the ref called for had not gone through yet. Would've been a goal if RVP waited until after Hart's foot had touched it.

[KaiGamer]

@chrism216 if hart had connected with his foot to the ball and then persie had taken it it would have been acceptable. Under these circumstances, it's basically the same as Hart having the ball in two hands, it was an illegal interference of play.

[mohsin213jc]

goal

[mufcbrazier]

shud be a goal

[rhienecat]

obviously it's a goal

[AleksMaric1]

I love this commentator. His voice is so epic!

[cvhashim]

@AleksMaric1 john motson

[Ahwanul12]

fuck this referee

[hersmuffet]

fucking referee

[rwac07]

nice shot by RVP, hes gonna get a 92 finish in the next fifa for suree

[Wezzaz16]

I do think it should have been a goal but it wasn't so no goal

[2011FCLiverpool]

you have to keep distance away from the goalkeeper...

[alexchelseafan]

@2011FCLiverpool Yeah he did but when RvP touched the ball the ball was in play, that why it should have been allowed.

[labelle145]

goal definatly the ball was in the air not in the keepers hands

[EDKxToPiCzZ]

@Pr0digYz1 When the ball was in the air

[Pr0digYz1]

It's not a goal because he had control of the ball, at what point did he not have control of the ball?

[SharinganLuigi]

@Pr0digYz1 When the ball was not at/in his feet/hands dick head

[iornmase]

Goal

[YK9Helper]

It's a mother forking goal

[4cwsm18]

goal



[COREYAD0909]

That guy is pissing all over the prem this season, easily one of the worlds best player, absolutely quality !

[zhafir99]

It's a goal

[Sajid10persie]

it's a goal

[kooora18]

It's a goal. The keeper wasn't in control.

[Georgeous129]

so he was gonna give 'ungentlemanly conduct' against van Persie....at the same time when van Persie was the only arsenal player there but Kompany, Dunne and Richards were following the referee too? is that gentlemanly conduct or is it trying to influence the referee into giving a booking?

[FuiKaka]

The goalkeeper needs to have it in 2 hands to be in 'control' ...goal.

[Sayper1]

No goal, read the rules before argueing.

[degekkejoop]

@Sayper1 Ok then, where are your arguments?

[Sayper1]

@degekkejoop when the goalkeeper has the ball in his hands and kicks it, he still has control of the ball, it doesn't matter that the ball was in the air. "controlling the ball involves(...) tossing it up in the air" It's strange, but that's the way it is.

[MrDarkTides]

The ref is a twat

[FJFlah71]

its a goal

[Ryanlauph]

It's not a dead ball after the keeper releases the ball out of his gloves, so yes, it's supposed to be a goal :P

Joe Hart should be more careful though.

[TheSocder]

Goal,,

[FOOTYMTW]

Realistically this should have counted. Keeper has no hands on the ball which makes it a loose ball

[FamousMovieScenes09]

Manchester Shitty being competitive due to their slimy circumstances is unsportsmanlike behaviour, but no officials do anything about that......

[GalaxyCatchupTV]

@FamousMovieScenes09

What, so sending Kompany off for no reason is right then??

Unsporting behaviour is every time Rooney doesn't like a challenge during a game of football he sprints over to the ref and squares upto him until they give him the decision he wants. This happens almost every game.

So fuck off you bias twat.

[FamousMovieScenes09]

@GalaxyCatchupTV Why are you talking to me about Rooney for like i give a shit?

Suck out, you cunt

[GalaxyCatchupTV]

@FamousMovieScenes09 grow up u little faggot. did ur mother drop u as a child?.. stop making negative comments on youtube then if u don't want any come-backs.

[magicjogabonito]

i wonder if it had been a foul of it if he had miss

[Busher50]

Goal should stand, not in two hands

[JackTheStriker]

@Busher50 The myth about being able to take the ball if it is is one hand not two is untrue, hence why it is a myth. The FA said it was a "myth spread on the streets".

[jopukka98]

iltasanomat like

[CASmithTV]

I think it should be allowed, but its just pretty unsportsman like

[KhuntMaster]

for everyone saying "how come that wasn't allowed" the rules state that a goalkeeper taking a drop kick is one motion, therefore taking the ball between it leaving his hand and hitting his foot is considered a foul (and it is potentially dangerous)

[joshua1999178]

goal

[TheRowdyOwl]

stop it at 0:30 clearly left his hands!

[eljeffegooner18]

I love van Persie and Arsenal to death, but the referee has clearly made the correct decision here

[TheRowdyOwl]

@eljeffegooner18 that's clearly fair, as the ball has left the goalie's hands, it's just like the keeper throwing the ball to him, no difference whatsoever

[I94IWilshere]

Well it is arsenal and ref's hate us, it had left the goalkeepers possession therefore the goal should stand

[GoonerGomaa]

sure. when ronaldinho does it he gets goal of the year and player of the year

[lRAF99]

Thiery Henry did the same thing a few years back

[wqulejwl]

@lRAF99 they changed the rules..

[oMeGaSoLjaX]

Only RVP would have hit it on the half volley.. hahaha.

[TwistNipple3OOO]

Should have been a goal (from a city fan)

[MarkitosGerardo303]

The Ref Has Obviously Never Played Fifa...



[MrDeadGaming]

@MarkitosGerardo303 Haha beast comment =P

[adda54]

Thierry Henry, Solskjaer and Van persie, none of those goals have been given...

[MrJpman001]

It clearly states in the rules goalkeeper most have both hands on ball to be in controll of the ball . Hart didnt have any hands on the ball . If an outfield player did it it would be ok so why not the goalkeeper

[daz14s]

does it mata??? did the goal stand??? NO so beta luck nxt time rvp

[skumstar]

FIFA Laws of the Game Page 115 states:

Offences committed against goalkeepers

A player must be penalised for playing in a dangerous manner if he kicks or

attempts to kick the ball when the goalkeeper is in the process of releasing

it.

Google FIFA Laws of the Game

EOD?

[DutchMasterStatus]

@skumstar That wasn't dangerous, keeper tossed the ball, RVP got it away without getting near the keeper. Keeper has to have two hands on the ball to be "in possession"

EOD?

[soccerHEROking]

LOL wtf .... that was actually a pretty dam GOOD GOAL!!!

[FameAU]

To all you serious people out there, that's a goal. Out of all the times this has happened 85 percent of the the time its classed as a goal. As soon as the ball is out of the keepers hands its anyone's ball. Some of you are basically saying that if the keeper had the ball near him its in his control. Haha.

[skumstar]

@FameAU That is not true, because if the goalkeeper is in the path of putting the ball in play, you can not intefere with him.

[adriann28]

@skumstar EXACTLY MAN, YOU REALLY KNOW THE RULE

[BrotherNorris4111]

The rules are so clear on this and its been explained so many times, its illegal if the ball is deemed in the keepers control. The action of releasing the ball to kick it out of your hands is considered 'in control' and therefore plucking it out of the air mid-kick like that is not allowed and the player doing so gets a booking. I dont know why this happens every 2-3 seasons and suddenly the debate starts up again? its not allowed, end of.

[MonstaInTheDark]

I play goalie and i know the rules, that's a blatant goal.

Must have two hands on it otherwise its free play for anyone trying to get it.

Tossed it up and punted, so yea he LOST CONTROL of it...

[mf103]

Call it 'ungentlemanly conduct' if you like, but don't claim that the keeper's "in control of the ball." No he's bloody not - van Persie took it off him! If I hired someone to be in control of my phone, and someone nicked it off them, I'd refuse to pay him!

[markus1312]

hart still has the ball under control although he already released it. it would be the death to football to allow goals like this.

[MrCampInABox]

@markus1312 What about the Nani vs Tottenham? Goals like that are the suposed "death of football" yet it's acceptable when it's Man Utd.

Also - read the rulebook? "A player can only take the ball from the Goal Keeper when the keeper has only one hand on the ball or is in the process of kicking it." So, what was that?

[markus1312]

@MrCampInABox

it was a goal by man united at old trafford. of course the rules are different in that case.

still, that's not a goal. according to the rules, the keeper is in control of the ball, so it's not allowed to take the ball off him.

[MrCampInABox]

@markus1312 The rules state "A player can only take the ball from the Goal Keeper when the keeper has only one hand on the ball or is in the process of kicking it." Does he have 1 hand on it, or is he in the process of kicking it?

He had one hand on it, drops it and is in the process of kicking it, that covers BOTH "ifs" so it IS a goal. End of.

[JevoTheGunners]

But imagine if this is a goal. Every player will then stand in front of goalkeeper and waiting till he throw the ball in the air

[MrCampInABox]

@JevoTheGunners Players already do that.

[FameAU]

@JevoTheGunners For your information, they do.

[Owend90]

The ball had been released from the keepers hands making the ball fair game to anyone on the pitch. the goal should of stood but at the end of the day the ref's word is final.

[falloverinasack]

it is a goal because the keeper has to have to 2 hands on the ball for it to be in his control so it should have been counted and also no man city player complained because they all thought it was a goal

[fluffymole0913]

Even as a Gooner, I gotta admit that's not a goal. If he'd blocked it after Hart kicked it it would be fine but because Hart hadn't kicked it, he was technically still in control of the ball, and van Persie cant do that while he is.

[MrCampInABox]

@fluffymole0913 If you check the rulebook, the keeper must have the ball in two hands for it to be classed as "under his control". It's not even as if Hart had it in two hands before dropping it to kick it, he had it in one hand. Van Persie would've been within his rights to flick it off Harts hand (providing he didn't touch Hart).

It should've been a goal. Not that it matters, but it should've.

[markus1312]

@MrCampInABox

no it should not have been a goal. read the rulebook again. thank you.

[StephenAlexWalker]

Clearly a goal another useless ref

[testme2770]

thats a goal

[calvinmcilroy386]

No goal

[777mhd777]

Henry n RVP both scored this way n both goals got canceled .

[hurricanes17]

I assume that Hart tried to take the kick because he knew that Van Persie was not legally allowed to block it. Read your rule books, kids.

[farucdagoona]

he sees vp doesn't he? keepers usually wait for the players to go because they know it would be a goal if he dropped it or let go and it was taken

[justrelaxin]

That's clear goal, shame it wasn't counted

[blacklittletom]

What is Hart then doing dropping the ball near Van Persie?

[torrevill]

Idiota z tego sędziego. Oczywiście, że to był gol, a kretyn nie uznał takiej pięknej bramki.

[Dave16101991]

Ball left the keepers hands van the man takes it and scores whats wrong ???? lol

[FifaLordEd]

@Dave16101991 just to make clear the rules says that until it touches the ground (if he rolls it out or drops it, not if he kicks it) then its still in the keeper 'possession' stupid i know

[x3CruZerx3]

@Dave16101991 the keeper throw the ball to kick it which means he is still in control of the ball, so the ref done the right thing

and dont hate me for the that but so it's written in the rules

[lfchoganlfc]

@Dave16101991 It is still classed as in the possesion on the goalkeeper until he kicks it or it touches the ground.

[visitnajr]

@lfchoganlfc ive seen the keeper try to throw the ball to his teammate to counter attack and the throw got cut off in the air and it wasnt a foul. why the hell should this be a foul?

[GalaxyCatchupTV]

@Dave16101991 Yeah but if they were the rules that it was allowed then keepers wouldn't be able to ever kick the ball and players would be constantly harassing the goalies when the ball is leaving their possession. There would be about 50 indirect free-kicks given inside the box per game for simply keeping hold of the ball for longer than 6 seconds.

So in conclusion to your question you have asked me, the answer is no it should not be allowed, period.

[kypasthug]

that's a stupid goalkeeper, doesnt matter if it was a goal or not

[dra900nka1n]

This is against the spirit of the law.

Anybody saying it's fair game is probably biased.

[TheMrSlap]

Rules say its a goal, so its a goal. Where's the argument?

[Ddrumzzz12]

it is a goal, damn ref!! the keeper dont have the ball on his hands..

[ya7yam]

stupid referee!! it should be counted as a true goal as van persie got use of it while it is free in the air

[DocSolomon]

Ref has a thing against ninjas

[willster191]

hahahaha learned from Henry for sure ! :D

[GabeIsAwEsOmE1234567]

Henry LOL Mini

[Niume187]

No it isnt because it´s not allowed to attack the keeper if he want to pass the ball

[MoriKAshi]

@Niume187 How did he "attack" the keeper? There was no challenge. Joe Hart threw it up and it's fair game.

[Jefroversdenurste]

@Niume187

This is a counting goal.

The keeper throws it up. So the ball is back in the game.

[degekkejoop]

When was this game? Ofcourse this is a goal.

[RutgherMusic]

Pure Goal!

[Filzoable]

that's a clear goal

[jojocool201177]

but when ronaldinho did it it was a goal right??

[nasermeter]

@jojocool201177 yeah well thats a goal..