This video demonstrates that you used different OCR software. Why would you expect two different programs to behave the same way? If you want a valid test, you need the same BC, same OCR, and same settings used.
@yuppyguitar1 Tomorrow I plan on doing another video. I agree with everything you said, I'm trying to be as unbiased as possible. I'm going to try and show even more inconsistencies, but also similarities.
@Wilbanian I dunno.. spread the word? To be perfectly honest... I'm not sure what we can do, but I do think we need to speak our minds as often as possible as to never give up, never surrender
Thanks, that's highlighted exactly the original concern that I raised. (sorry to be late to respond but I was traveling on business)... Anyway, although I couldn't say 100% without some background in computer forensics, your demo of modern OCR software working on a similarly structured document is compelling enough for me to say at this point that I definitely have doubts as to the authenticity of the cert posted by the WH.
@slvl So after I got this comment (I was driving) I couldn't wait to get home and investigate what you were talking about. You're right, the bottom later DOES have a group of layers... however, it was just two extra layers, neither of which did anything to the image... I'm going to scan my birth cert tomorrow at my scanners highest DPI and try one more time... but I'm pretty sure it's going to come up with the same result..
@ShizzleMcBizzle Thanks for the answer. I don't believe the certificate is faked. The layers in the Obama certificate are too random to be the result of intentional tampering. All the groups contain image date and no vector data as far as I've seen. If it was to be tampered with in Illustrator the data would be vector. If it was to be tampered with in Photoshop there wouldn't be any separate image layers, just a grouped clipping mask and a flattened image. (cont.)
@slvl (continued...) I don't really care if the certificate is real or not, I'm from Europe, but I can't stand it that some people (I am not referring to you) just go screaming around their opinion on things they only marginally understand at best. To those people it doesn't matter what the outcome is, it can only be true if it coincides with their belief. I am convinced that even if God said it was real they would not believe it.
You seem to be wanting to take this as objective as possible...
I will be sharing this video as much as possible. I have performed the same tests with the same results, and it is obvious something is just not right. IMO, it was at the very least altered, and is definitely not a "scan" of a piece of paper or an image, or a picture, but something produced using a computer.
@ktrychel Yeah.. it's obvious they're looking to keep the debate going to keep us distracted from something much bigger... what that is... well, it's anyones guess... thanks for sharing the video... I think it's worth it
thanks for doing this vid. I wanted to try it out with my birth certificate as well, but I lack a scanner, so I will do so as soon as I get a chance to get to a scanner and save my own. in the meantime, this is very interesting. I also performed the same tests and found the same results on obama's birth certificate, and I am just baffled as to WHY it would be this way. Is it a shoddy attempt to alter a document or some kind of other bizarre "glitch"? I don't know. All I know is something is odd
This video demonstrates that you used different OCR software. Why would you expect two different programs to behave the same way? If you want a valid test, you need the same BC, same OCR, and same settings used.
yuppyguitar1 10 months ago
@yuppyguitar1 Tomorrow I plan on doing another video. I agree with everything you said, I'm trying to be as unbiased as possible. I'm going to try and show even more inconsistencies, but also similarities.
ShizzleMcBizzle 10 months ago
Solid proof, also the green patterned background is way too flat and perfect.
The question is, can we do anything about it?
Wilbanian 10 months ago
@Wilbanian I dunno.. spread the word? To be perfectly honest... I'm not sure what we can do, but I do think we need to speak our minds as often as possible as to never give up, never surrender
ShizzleMcBizzle 10 months ago
@ShizzleMcBizzle
Thanks, that's highlighted exactly the original concern that I raised. (sorry to be late to respond but I was traveling on business)... Anyway, although I couldn't say 100% without some background in computer forensics, your demo of modern OCR software working on a similarly structured document is compelling enough for me to say at this point that I definitely have doubts as to the authenticity of the cert posted by the WH.
Thanks for taking the time.
kfpok 10 months ago
Could you tell what's in the bottom layer of your certificate? There seems to be a group of layers in there.
slvl 10 months ago
@slvl So after I got this comment (I was driving) I couldn't wait to get home and investigate what you were talking about. You're right, the bottom later DOES have a group of layers... however, it was just two extra layers, neither of which did anything to the image... I'm going to scan my birth cert tomorrow at my scanners highest DPI and try one more time... but I'm pretty sure it's going to come up with the same result..
ShizzleMcBizzle 10 months ago
@ShizzleMcBizzle Thanks for the answer. I don't believe the certificate is faked. The layers in the Obama certificate are too random to be the result of intentional tampering. All the groups contain image date and no vector data as far as I've seen. If it was to be tampered with in Illustrator the data would be vector. If it was to be tampered with in Photoshop there wouldn't be any separate image layers, just a grouped clipping mask and a flattened image. (cont.)
slvl 10 months ago
@slvl (continued...) I don't really care if the certificate is real or not, I'm from Europe, but I can't stand it that some people (I am not referring to you) just go screaming around their opinion on things they only marginally understand at best. To those people it doesn't matter what the outcome is, it can only be true if it coincides with their belief. I am convinced that even if God said it was real they would not believe it.
You seem to be wanting to take this as objective as possible...
slvl 10 months ago
I will be sharing this video as much as possible. I have performed the same tests with the same results, and it is obvious something is just not right. IMO, it was at the very least altered, and is definitely not a "scan" of a piece of paper or an image, or a picture, but something produced using a computer.
ktrychel 10 months ago
@ktrychel Yeah.. it's obvious they're looking to keep the debate going to keep us distracted from something much bigger... what that is... well, it's anyones guess... thanks for sharing the video... I think it's worth it
ShizzleMcBizzle 10 months ago
That's about the best vid on Obama's birth certificate so far !!!
Finally, someone's showing a comparison with a real birth certificate - very interesting...
Perle3456 10 months ago
@Perle3456 Share this video... the other ones I made are getting more attention, and I think this one deserves it all
ShizzleMcBizzle 10 months ago
thanks for doing this vid. I wanted to try it out with my birth certificate as well, but I lack a scanner, so I will do so as soon as I get a chance to get to a scanner and save my own. in the meantime, this is very interesting. I also performed the same tests and found the same results on obama's birth certificate, and I am just baffled as to WHY it would be this way. Is it a shoddy attempt to alter a document or some kind of other bizarre "glitch"? I don't know. All I know is something is odd
ktrychel 10 months ago
@ktrychel I agree... it's very very odd. Share this video with others, I think it raises a lot of good questions. Thanks for watching! INFOWARS.COM
ShizzleMcBizzle 10 months ago