Creationists are treasonous sub-members of the human species. These failed fallen craven cowards are destroying my planet and my species. Carbon monoxide cures creationism. If you are faithful, if you are a creationist ask your government for the gas and go see your 6000 year old god concept :) lol religion lol
@ah93704 You meant condescension. Sometimes the spell check doesnt give you what you want. Anyways. If I had my way Id fill a pit with the 5 billion failed fallen farcical faithful and let them turn slowly to oil under a fucking mountain of bibles and korans all topped with pig guts and pig shit to aid in the fermentation process. Religionists are enemies of Humanity, they are guilty of a kind of Human treason. Religion is the new Nazi. Its time to hate the haters. Down with your silly god son.
@disturbedfrog Homosexuality is justified so much and discensitizing people to accept it. They are shoveling this into peoples mind and thoughts to legitamize this behavior. Love has it's limits by the way. You can't love(sexual relationship with) your son or daughter because it's unnatural, neither can you(as an adult) love(sexually) a preteen or teen, or a toddler, because it is unnatural no matter how strongly you feel about it, it's wrong. Morals are not subjective or preference.
@Creationcreed well there are different kinds of love, should we need to differentiate between them; so be it. We are not talking about love towards a friend or family love to each other or a love for hockey and what not. We are also focusing a relationship between adults, not tweens or pretweens. Since when is morality associated with naturalness. I think morals are subjective, because they depend on the peoples outlook on the world.
@Creationcreed is a male male relationship wrong compared to a supposedly right male female relationship? I still dont understand. Is that morally wrong?
@disturbedfrog It depends on how you measure what is right and what is wrong. If male could be with male, why is it that the anatomy of males are incompatible with one another, and male/female parts are design perfectly for one another? It's not so weird or, off the wall, to think or conclude from a natural standpoint it would be wrong to engage in that kind of relationship... By what standard are you working from to conclude it isn't wrong?
@Creationcreed well it seems that they are not incompatible with each other but it is a matte of fact that males contain g spots in their anuses. And if you are assuming that the main point of a relationship is to have sex, even though males can do such things, there are many ways in which people are fulfilled in a relationship. Psychologically speaking males can engage in relationships with each other.
@disturbedfrog To many pedophiles, what you just said can apply to their relationships. And, If I were to just go by my statement about the physical compatibility alone, the pedophile would still have a good argument against me as well. So the question is who draws the line in the sand? It can feel good to do lots of things, but are they morally right?...Beastiality is another that could say on the basis of satisfaction and Psychologically benefits. Who draws the line for us all?(seriously)
@Creationcreed like I said, we are in a discussion about consenting adults, not chickens, horses or children. That is a totally different issue, one where we as a society draw a line based on many moral standpoints
@disturbedfrog Society draws the line? So society is the measuring rod of what is right and wrong?...Homosexuals have to use a different kind of argument that cannot apply to those other kinds of relationships I mentioned.
@Creationcreed society is a huge measuring rod of what is right and wrong. Our own understanding of human nature and what is right, wrong, and just in a hierarchical society should be reflected in the criminal code. The use of our intellect and reason to determine how a group of people should live and function in a complicated social situation. Homosexuals do not need to hide from any argument, even if a complete one was presented by yourself.
@disturbedfrog Are you sure you want to roll with the whole "What Society Says". Much of society believed that slavery was right, women could vote, etc. What make the people who are the minority right when the society says the opposite. That would mean that the minority is in fact wrong according you this logic. So homosexuality is wrong no matter what the minority says(gays are the minority right now). It would be wrong to fight against a majority, right?
@Creationcreed It would be wrong to fight against a majority? If slaves were the minority and now they are not would it be logical to assume that someone challenged the majority and changed law. At one point slaves were legal to own then we as a society changed that using reason and compassion for our fellow man. Where do you suppose we get our moral measuring rod if not from our own reasoning
MSNBC likes to put idiots like these on the air to show how stupid the right wing realy is.
the moral decline is from the right.
thesageofohio 6 months ago
Who lets these crazy people on TV ?. Oh wait its MSNBC.
northernsoul44 6 months ago
Creationists are treasonous sub-members of the human species. These failed fallen craven cowards are destroying my planet and my species. Carbon monoxide cures creationism. If you are faithful, if you are a creationist ask your government for the gas and go see your 6000 year old god concept :) lol religion lol
699backstab 1 year ago 5
@699backstab don't think i cud have summed up this whole load of ballshit any better, totally agree with u and keep spreading the "good word" :-P
simonpaulv 8 months ago
@699backstab take your condensation and shove it up your twat. I"d love to beat the shit out of yuo for saying that you godless atheist bastard!
ah93704 5 months ago
@ah93704 You meant condescension. Sometimes the spell check doesnt give you what you want. Anyways. If I had my way Id fill a pit with the 5 billion failed fallen farcical faithful and let them turn slowly to oil under a fucking mountain of bibles and korans all topped with pig guts and pig shit to aid in the fermentation process. Religionists are enemies of Humanity, they are guilty of a kind of Human treason. Religion is the new Nazi. Its time to hate the haters. Down with your silly god son.
699backstab 5 months ago
Comment removed
699backstab 5 months ago
@disturbedfrog Homosexuality is justified so much and discensitizing people to accept it. They are shoveling this into peoples mind and thoughts to legitamize this behavior. Love has it's limits by the way. You can't love(sexual relationship with) your son or daughter because it's unnatural, neither can you(as an adult) love(sexually) a preteen or teen, or a toddler, because it is unnatural no matter how strongly you feel about it, it's wrong. Morals are not subjective or preference.
Creationcreed 1 year ago
@Creationcreed well there are different kinds of love, should we need to differentiate between them; so be it. We are not talking about love towards a friend or family love to each other or a love for hockey and what not. We are also focusing a relationship between adults, not tweens or pretweens. Since when is morality associated with naturalness. I think morals are subjective, because they depend on the peoples outlook on the world.
disturbedfrog 1 year ago
@disturbedfrog Morals are Subjective, right? Well, is homosexuality wrong?
Creationcreed 1 year ago
@Creationcreed wrong in what sense?
disturbedfrog 1 year ago
@disturbedfrog Good. What I mean is a male in a relationship with another male as he would a woman.
Creationcreed 1 year ago
@Creationcreed is a male male relationship wrong compared to a supposedly right male female relationship? I still dont understand. Is that morally wrong?
disturbedfrog 1 year ago
@disturbedfrog It depends on how you measure what is right and what is wrong. If male could be with male, why is it that the anatomy of males are incompatible with one another, and male/female parts are design perfectly for one another? It's not so weird or, off the wall, to think or conclude from a natural standpoint it would be wrong to engage in that kind of relationship... By what standard are you working from to conclude it isn't wrong?
Creationcreed 1 year ago
@Creationcreed well it seems that they are not incompatible with each other but it is a matte of fact that males contain g spots in their anuses. And if you are assuming that the main point of a relationship is to have sex, even though males can do such things, there are many ways in which people are fulfilled in a relationship. Psychologically speaking males can engage in relationships with each other.
disturbedfrog 1 year ago
@disturbedfrog To many pedophiles, what you just said can apply to their relationships. And, If I were to just go by my statement about the physical compatibility alone, the pedophile would still have a good argument against me as well. So the question is who draws the line in the sand? It can feel good to do lots of things, but are they morally right?...Beastiality is another that could say on the basis of satisfaction and Psychologically benefits. Who draws the line for us all?(seriously)
Creationcreed 1 year ago
@Creationcreed like I said, we are in a discussion about consenting adults, not chickens, horses or children. That is a totally different issue, one where we as a society draw a line based on many moral standpoints
disturbedfrog 1 year ago
@disturbedfrog Society draws the line? So society is the measuring rod of what is right and wrong?...Homosexuals have to use a different kind of argument that cannot apply to those other kinds of relationships I mentioned.
Creationcreed 1 year ago
@Creationcreed society is a huge measuring rod of what is right and wrong. Our own understanding of human nature and what is right, wrong, and just in a hierarchical society should be reflected in the criminal code. The use of our intellect and reason to determine how a group of people should live and function in a complicated social situation. Homosexuals do not need to hide from any argument, even if a complete one was presented by yourself.
disturbedfrog 1 year ago
@disturbedfrog Are you sure you want to roll with the whole "What Society Says". Much of society believed that slavery was right, women could vote, etc. What make the people who are the minority right when the society says the opposite. That would mean that the minority is in fact wrong according you this logic. So homosexuality is wrong no matter what the minority says(gays are the minority right now). It would be wrong to fight against a majority, right?
Creationcreed 1 year ago
@Creationcreed It would be wrong to fight against a majority? If slaves were the minority and now they are not would it be logical to assume that someone challenged the majority and changed law. At one point slaves were legal to own then we as a society changed that using reason and compassion for our fellow man. Where do you suppose we get our moral measuring rod if not from our own reasoning
disturbedfrog 1 year ago
@disturbedfrog Was slavery truly right at the time when the majority thought it was?
Creationcreed 1 year ago