Added: 3 years ago
From: RidleyReport
Views: 4,557
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (22)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • You forgot to mention as a gov. agent she must identify upon request and give other related info.

  • @daddyg321 Not exactly a government agent, she is employed as a co-ordinator for a government youth program. Ridley has way overplayed this, he approached a group of children with a few adults filming them, she said they were working and they couldn't go signing petitions at that time. He then started to harass a lady who was in charge of a bunch of children, she rightfully complained to the police who told him not to harass people. They never "attacked" him and it was never a controversy

  • @BroomeBlocker4 If she gets paid from tax dollars(see legal dictionary for agent) she must identify herself and agency. 18 -21 are not children, it seems more that she was wrong and Ridley should have complained.

  • Dude you are kind of a jack ass. You act like your rights are more important then others. Do it the right way write a god damn letter per your first and 5th ass.

  • I have found a document referring to that program.

    they received $154,216.35 in FY 2009

  • !4 year olds working?? Isn't there a law against that? I am sure there are guidleines to what age any child can work. 16 most states.

  • reluctant to videotape for "various reasons". what reason would that be?

  • @littlebigefan Minors.

  • You are wise not to film if you think the subjects could be minors.. there could be an issue there.

  • I told you it was the brownshirts. And we pay for these terrible 'makework' programs. Also, you can be damned sure that if a cop tells you to stop taping them, it means they are ABOUT TO DO SOMETHING ILLEGAL to you.

  • Keep up the fight Ridley !!

  • Hey Mr. Ridley. As far as NH law what is the law to videotape. If you are videotape and they tell you to turn it off are you within your legal right to refuse. I assume you are since they do not like to be on camera and that is why they tell you to shut it off. Thanks

  • Congratulations, David. This is some of the BEST investigative reporting I have seen, ever. If only the major media outlets did the same.

  • It's arguable that you're not even required to give them your name, given the wording of RSA 644:6-II:

    --

    Failure to identify or account for oneself, absent other circumstances, however, shall not be grounds for arrest.

    --

  • It's the Illuminati, Ridley! The Illuminati! And the Trilateral Commission! They're gonna take over Manchester I tell ya! Only you and Will Infantine can save us!

  • Just shut up, do what you are told and,oh yeah, pay your taxes.

  • Thats a great view on life. If you watch some of Ridleys videos you will see alot of what they are "told" to do by police is actually illegal. Huh... go figure

  • Go Ridley Report Thank you!

  • Great reporting.

    Great music.

  • Thanks for the video Mr. Ridley. I appreciate the manner at which you are presenting information. My experience and research on answering police questions has revealed that it is not wise to discuss or answer questions from police due to the fact that anything you do and or say can be used against you. ANYTHING ! In this case your video camera and cell phone were your friend. Your name is all your required to give them. In this case Mr. Ridley in most part refused to answer most questions.

  • Hmmmmm... Still keepin' quiet 'eh?

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more