Added: 1 year ago
From: Rys2sense
Views: 3,401
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (189)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @cytuber

    you made the right choice hun! As far as all women? WRONG!

  • plus cutting off foresking seems more like a mind control practice, put the victim through pain and trauma then hug him/her and tell him ''its ok'', thats a MK ULTRA tactic all the way..not to mention is a business that makes money, and circumsised men dont enjoy sex as much, theres billions of nerve endings on the foreskin that give enormous pleasure during sex, plus why would God make it a part of creation if he wanted it to be ''cut off'', i thought he doesnt make mistakes.

  • the bible is a book of confusion and contradiction, but hey it did say we were made in God's image, so its only right that he changes his mind every other book right? in the New Testament it speaks of circumsion as something symbolic of stripping off your bodily flesh in order that u can walk in spirit wit God, u know how the Bible says ''dont be a part of this world'' we are only a part of it by flesh, so if we manage to please God by not sinning we ''cut off'' our flesh meaning we sin no more

  • What type of pleasure does the god yahweh get out of foreskin the bible says he loves the smell of blood and he has sadistic ways because it says he will torture people forever because they don't believe in him like some type of cosmic bully and psychopath but what is yahweh's obsession with blood and foreskins?

  • No hun, i was being for real n stuff :-( sowwy pumpkin

  • Lets face it ladies, foreskin is just awful. I remember i had to break up with a guy because of his disgusting foreskin. He would always go on and on about how much he washes it and how clean it is and how not to be afraid of it because of how odd or revolting I think it may look... Well, he had to go, along with his uncut willy.

    My new soon to be Hubby is of course circumcised, like all real men should be.

    His penis is perfect!

    Who wants to go down on that? EWIES!!! Sorry!

  • @poopyskidmark I hope you were being sarcastic.

  • @poopyskidmark I had to break up with a woman because she had these god awful flaps of skin hanging from her vagina and man did she stink then I found out all women do.

    I demanded my next girlfriend get her flaps cut off so her crinkly pussy looks smooth and smells better. It's far more hygienic to have a a smooth round pussy than crinkly dangling bits don't you think?

  • @cytuber

    I agree. Its pretty disgusting that women walk around like that at all, uncircumcised. There are so many women in the middle east, and africa who look, and smell so much better after their circumcision. I mean, its just a flap of skin? And it prevents STD, and AIDS, so they can have all the sex they want without reprecussions. I wish they would overturn the female "genital mutilation" act, it makes the vagina much cleaner.

    *Heavy Sarcasm, unless the women are to sexist and ignorant

  • @poopyskidmark you prefer halflings?

  • Comment removed

  • you need to SHUT UP

    PS. David was a cheeky fella ;-)

  • you need to SHUT UP.

  • Thank god I am NOT circumcised. My girl friend loves my dick and for smell??? I shower and there is no smell ignorance and uneducated people are the reason circumcision continues. What ever idea you have about it ultimately it is his body and should be his choice not yours!

  • I thank God I'm circumcized. In America, it happens at a point in your life when you don't even remember the pain. A little bit of pain when you're a baby is better than walking an entire life on this earth with a smelly, ugly wrinkled sack around your penis. No, it's not required by the bible, but it is a health principle. The foreskin is a moist bacteria collector and many uncuts experience phimosis when they're older. I saw it often when I worked in the nursing homes.

  • please keep up the lopping off of foreskins for all us ladies out there! TRUST US!!!!

    UNCUT GUYS ARE DISGUSTING! CAN YOU SAY SMEGMA? HEAD CHEESE? HIV/AIDS?

  • @poopyskidmark well you know women produce more smegma than men.  Women are the dirty creatures. Only in America are women so stupid they think an intact penis is unhealthy. They allow cosmetic surgery on male babies and refuse to let their 10 yr old daughters get pierced ears. Bloody hypocrites!

  • as a woman, i think uncut guys are gross, and yes they do smell. sorry!

  • @poopyskidmark We say the thing about the female genitalia but were more reticent about it. Who knows maybe if we spoke out of our mouth holes too, we can repeal the ban on female circumcision from 1995! But in all seriousness, I am against both forms of mutilation.

  • @poopyskidmark uncut women are gross too. Stupid uncut women are even worse.

  • The religious reasons for circ are pretty silly. Taking a blade to a kid's junk because several millenia ago, a man, who may or may not have existed claimed that an extremely powerful extradimensional being instructed him to do so? Pah. Anyone at the time who took him seriously is a damn fool in my book, much less anyone today.

  • ok last but not least, i do believe happened in biblical times that was so amazing and mind boggling that parents stumbling out and around in the desert for 40 years were willing to let some guy (the rabbi or moil) use a sharp object on the end of their little babies dick... no MAN would do that out of mere custom to his own boys dick... nawwwww... something awesome enough happened out there for them to accept the commandment to circumcise... 

  • @FreedomNetworkDotCom

    they didn't circumcise during the exodus, they had to start again in Joshua. it is at a place called "gilgal," which means "circle" or "rolling away." they were circumcised before they attacked the phillistines and canaanites. genital mutilation may have had it's place when you and your buddy are going into war facing death and amputation by the enemy, but far more is removed from infants in american hospitals than they even mentioned in the bible, and we are in maritime

  • I always found it kind of ironic the horror with which we react to female genital mutilation in Africa or Asia.

  • @chaseef gender based double standards. very bad shit.

  • No baby ever consented to cosmetic pleasure-reducing wpenis reduction surgery.

    HIS body, HIS decision.

  • Support FEMALE CIRCUMCISION !

  • @legalizefemalecirc you have a very valid argument on this video ironically...

    neither should be legal or both should...

    some women actually want to be circumcised too... just go to Egypt... the women push it on each other there...

    it is barbaric though....

  • My brothers and all the men from my dad's sad are circumcised because of religious matters. They don't complain at all. On the contrary, they say it themselves it is very comfortable.

  • @cpeigney94 because they were never uncircumsized and dont know the difference.

  • @Rys2sense then neither do you know the difference since you havent been circumcized.

  • @Rys2sense Male Circumcision = Female Circumcision

    The same nerve-endings in the foreskin are in the clitoris.

  • Not one national medical association on earth (not even Israel's) endorses routine circumcision. This includes the bodies who have revised their policies SINCE the research on HIV in Africa has been available.

    Foreskin feels REALLY good.  HIS body, HIS decision.

  • @TLCTugger

    By the way, HIV is a scam. There are some very interesting videos here on youtube that will explain it.

  • I turned a religious Muslim at 14 and wanted to get circumcized. My carer refused to give me permission until I was old enough to make the decision myself. As soon as I was 18 I would have gone to the clinic to get it done. I didn't even care what it involved because I had to do it according to my religion anyway.

    Fortunately, I abandoned religion altogether when I was nearing my 18th birthday for philosophical/logical reasons. I was so close and now I am so so so so glad I didn't get it done!

  • @J4m3z1

    Nelson Mandella describes his circumcision in his autobiography. He said it felt like fire was running through his veins.

    At least he understands what happened to him and why. Infants are simply tortured.

  • If you can edit Wikipedia, please do! Jake Waskett (an admitted circumfetishist/circumcisexual who finds infant circumcision erotic) has had a monopoly on all circumcision related articles on wiki... meaning, he edits more than anyone else and controls the content, making everything pro-circ biased. Help stop him!

  • So-called medical professionals have come up with innumerable reasons to circumcise. It was claimed to prevent blindness, insanity, epilepsy, and a host of other conditions. No other operation has been touted as such a panacea as circumcision. As these benefits are proven false, doctors come up with new ones. Hopefully as these justifications become weaker and weaker, people might start to realize how unnecessary and even harmful circumcision really is.

  • Comment removed

  • @lubbockboy1 There is no more important issue than treating an infant or child fairly and with compassion.

    The foreskins are sold to pharmaceutical and cosmetic companies. Expensive wrinkle creams made from infant foreskins are sold to old ladies like Oprah Winfrey and Barbara Walters.

  • I think, if given the choice, a lot of circumcised men would switch back.

    A lot just for the fact that's it's physically more v.s. less.

    Uncircumcised men have the convertible option with their equipment.

    Circumcised only gets the default option.

  • R.W. Cockshut demands that all boys be circumcised in order to desensitize the penis and promote chastity.

    Abraham L. Wolbarst claims that circumcision prevents penile cancer.

    Abraham Ravich claims that circumcision prevents prostate cancer.

    Eugene H. Hand declares that circumcision prevents venereal disease and cancer of the tongue.

    Ernest L. Wydner claims that male circumcision prevents cervical cancer in women.

  • I don't think its bad if you have a choice.

    What I am against is the Jewish tradition of sucking blood from (with mouth) the freshly circumcised penis of an 8 day old baby. This has given many babies herpes and has probably killed many. This is practised in New York all the time. Its called "metzitzah b'peh" look it up. If this were the practise of some other group i bet it would be all over the media and there would be a public uproar.

  • tube playing hide n seek again

    clik "see all "

  • Women of circucised men have less cervical cancer.

    Yeshua is coming soon.

  • Thank you for this. What's fascinating about circumcision in newborns WITHOUT anesthesia, is that after the initial fuss, the baby calms down all on his own. EEG studies now reveal that the babies shut down into a state of shock for 3 days, with drastic repercussions on bonding in a culture where men are emasculated from the get-go. - Slaving cultures love to teach their memberts to calm down each time they are subject to violence or isolation.

  • Comment removed

  • Search YT for "rabbi cole you must suck it"

  • Good on you for highlighting this story, which illustrates how Jewish circumcision easily degenerates into a sadomasochistic fetish. The unspoken real reason for religious circumcision is to discourage intermarriage with those accustomed to the natural penis, defined to be inferior infidels.

  • @QuietSetting : I thank my mother for NOT having it done. Adult circumcision in not common in Europe, where they heal the foreskin rather than chopping it off. Billions of men around the world go through their entire lives without ever regretting that they have foreskin. Adult circ has fewer complications than infant circ. The foreskin is not a mistake of nature, but a genital detail that enhances the pleasure and functionality of sex for both genders.

  • @QuietSetting you're crazy. having a foreskin means more pleasure during sex and there is no reality based reason to remove it.

  • @QuietSetting "The fear and risks associated with adult circumcision surgery". Right, because there is no fear and no risks associated with infant circumcision surgery. Most intact adult men never choose to become circumcised. The majority of adult circumcisions (like all circumcisions) are completely unnecessary and done for misdiagnosed medical reasons or for cosmetic reasons. If an adult wants to alter his body cosmetically then he can, but don't foist such things on children.

  • @QuietSetting The majority of adult men that choose to get circumcised for cosmetic reasons do so because they grew up intact in a circumcising culture and were made to feel bad about their natural penises. In other words they do so to fit in and be accepted.

    "Many men thank their parents later in their adult life for having had the surgery done as babies." Yes, and many men hate their parents for it. Many men also thank their parents for leaving them intact. It's a moot point.

  • @QuietSetting "And other men without the surgery, after experiencing the many issues associated with having foreskin, wish their parents had done it." What "issues" would those be exactly? Most of the world is intact and gets by just fine. Foreskin is a natural and normal part of human anatomy and is not pathological. It is protective and erogenous genital tissue.

    And if there are intact men in circumcising cultures who "wish their parents had done it" then the solution is simple.

  • @QuietSetting If an adult male should choose to get circumcised then he has the benefit of general anaesthetic and post-op pain meds. He also has the ability to choose his doctor, and the type and method of circumcision he wants. A baby or child has none of these options.

    His body. His choice.

  • @QuietSetting Even if I were to ackowledge that in some cases, this may be true, it can easily go the other way. A man who's intact but wants to be circumcised just has to suck it up and do it (you mean to tell me a grown man can't endure what a baby goes through?) A circumcised man who wishes he had a normal penis, on the other hand, has no choice. Better to delay what can be done any time rather than rush into making an irrevocable choice.

  • @PrismaMD A embryo at about 2 to 3 mos looks just like a blood filled leech, and in fact is living the life of a parasite. Ask any woman who has had a miscarriage before 3mos, she will tell you. I am sure life is there, but it is not identifiable from a leech.

  • @medini2 actually, i need to consult the medical dictionary when a embryo becomes a fetus. & when the head and eyes start to form. moot anyway as we are in the endtimes. maybe now we can start focusing the important issues of supporting those who are living and struggling.

  • It's true! Again, it's true! The scriptures do NOT dictate circumcision! I don't know why everyone has their boys circumcized! Herd mentality!

  • Circumcision is not that bad, yeah it might hurt, but so do many other things, and there is scientific evidence that it can prevent some health problems. It also makes your dick look better.

  • @zazu27604 I can tell you that the women who think a circumcized male looks better are brainwashed, delusional! I really hate to go there, but, i will... the foreskin also has a purpose in helping a female achieve orgasm. Sometimes, I think the people who came up w/ this idea just didn't want sex to be so enjoyable for the masses.

  • @zazu27604 there is not scientific evidence for health that's all bullshit.

  • @zazu27604 that's BS, mine is unmutilated and is doing just fine.

  • @zazu27604 The "scientific evidence" you point to is largely propaganda. Years ago some "scientists" in the medical and nutritional field engaged in similar propaganda postulating pork would be worse for the body than other types of meat.

    Fact now well established is: Pork, firstly, is no worse than other red meat. And red meat is not as bad as its reputation. In fact, much like surprisingly healthy (despite poverty) Far Eastern peoples have known for millenia, red meat in doses is NEEDED.

  • @dinavienna There is a long list of supposed medical reasons judaics have dreamed up to try to justify mutilating babies. Here are a few

    Edward H. Dixon declares that circumcision prevents masturbation.

    Johnathon Hutchinson publishes his theory that circumcision prevents syphilis.

    Lewis A. Sayre publishes a paper 'proving' that circumcision cures epilepsy.

    Joseph Bell announces his discovery that circumcision cures bed wetting.

  • @zazu27604 And pork is HEALTHY. It contains vitamins (especially B1 and B6) and unsaturated fat acids that actually *lower* cholesterine in the body, much contrary to the lie pork is "too fat" for human beings. Any overdose of red meat or fat meat like Western societies practice in contrast to Far Eastern Asians ones who eat smallest doses of meat with every meal is not healthy, and can lead to weight gain.

    But so-called "science" has spread lies and deception about pork.

  • @dinavienna do you mean cholesterol and not cholesterine? Most meats contain large amounts of LDL Cholesterol. I like boiling my meat, skimming the oil, then reintroducing the stock to the meat. Makes for much healthier dishes that still taste great.

  • @zazu27604 And the "health indication" for circumcision is only there for existing problems (phimosis). Of course you undergo surgery when something is WRONG with your body. Why do it without anything being wrong?

    P.s Rys2sense, activists against "female circumcision" from the countries these practices come from have urged interested people the world over to stop using the euphemizing term circumcision in favor of the much more appropriate "mutilation" (hence female genital mutilation).

  • @dinavienna Interestingly most women whose genitals were cut in childhood balk at the term mutilated the same way most men who were cut as children balk at the word mutilated.

    Forced circumcision of any child is a sexual mutilation. Circumcision (to cut around) is a euphemism for sexual mutilation.

    Phimosis is the natural state of every male infant and no child should ever be forcibly retracted. Phimosis that persists in adulthhood can often be "cured" by less invasive means than circumcision.

  • @zazu27604

    I think circumcized dicks look awful. Makes me feel sorry for my circumcized male friends but I understand that they're just used to it so it doesn't affect them psychologically.

  • @J4m3z1

    Just remember to talk to your friends when they're expecting and tell them to leave their son intact. Do it for him.

  • @zazu27604

    Your view that it "looks better" is totally subjective. You grew up in a circumcised society so that's what you've been conditioned to believe. I've personally seen some gross looking circumcisons; dark scar lines, skin bridges and tight, raw-looking shafts. I don't think they look better at all.

    Besides, for the most part, both circumcised and intact penis look the same when erect. Nobody pays any attention to them when they're flaccid. So it's kind of a moot point.

  • @zazu27604 According to whom? Surely the owner of the dick should be the one to decide this when he's old enough?

  • @zazu27604 Rubbish. You only think it looks better because you've been trained to believe that. it's purely subjective. Sadly, in many cases, by the time the man is old enough to make up his own mind, it's far too late.

  • @PrismaMD No it's not a black and white line the same way being fat is not a black and white line, you can't say at exactly 12 weeks or something like that. But certainly conscious life is not instantaneous that's SCIENTIFIC. Denying that is faith based. Forming a baby is a process not magic. The embryo becomes a fetus which becomes a baby it is not a baby at first contact anymore than sperm is a baby. The cells have to be fed for months. There is no brain, not a baby it's an embryo. FACT

  • As always......priceless. Keep it up Ryan. Love the ending. Sick Freaks. Can babies sue?

  • @PrismaMD

    Foolish consistency is the hobgoglin of the simple mind.

  • girls dont like uncircumcised penis

  • @BeingInTheMessiah

    Nonsense.  The physical act of intercourse is much more comfortable with a natural penis. The foreskin of a circumcised penis is keritized. So take your pick:

    The soft, moist glans of a natural penis being pushed in you, or the dry stick of a mutilated dick.

  • @jx14aby since you apparently have "been with lots of girls" you would know how monumentally more lubricated the vagina is versus the penis. So your making the point either because your a moron or because your an ass. I said what I said based on female testimony, so your opinion really doesnt matter much.

  • @BeingInTheMessiah

    Wow! You call me a moron or an ass! You really are the Messiah, aren't you? Or are you just the biggest hypocrite on the planet.

    Why are you so enamored with mutilating another man's penis? Is it the part where the mohel gives the kid his first blow job? Or do you really believe sliding a scapel around the tip of a baby's boy's penis is a good thing?

  • @jx14aby moron, ass, unreasoning beast. its all the same, and its not inaccurate per my befuddling of your attempt at logic

  • @BeingInTheMessiah

    "I suggest that all male children should be circumcised. This is "against nature", but that is exactly the reason why it should be done. Nature intends that the adolescent male shall copulate as often and as promiscuously as possible, and to that end covers the sensitive glans so that it shall be ever ready to receive stimuli. Civilization, on the contrary, requires chastity, and the glans of the circumcised rapidly assumes a leathery texture less sensitive than skin."

  • @jx14aby lol the best part about your response is that the bias of the person your quoting is that circumcision is the greatest cultural discovery since language. but to get back to the point, I submit that my hands are "less sensitive than skin" and Iv never met a woman who didnt like a hand on her clit, despite it being more sensitive than the inside of her vagina. just give up. anyone who can make it through our back and forths and has a brainstem can see im right and your wrong

  • @BeingInTheMessiah

    Maybe I lost your point. You're right that you have the right to mutilate another man's penis and I'm wrong when I say you don't?

    Because I'm not wrong and you are. You can try to rationalize it all you want by saying its cleaner, healthier, women like it better, it prevents HIV, whatever nonsense you want to spew.

    No one has the right to mutliate someone else's body. You lose.

  • @jx14aby i said women like it, you said its not comfortable for women, I said thats BS and then proved it, you went on whining about something that doesnt harm anyone. maybe you should dedicate your efforts to exposing how malicious it is to mandate that all newborns be vaccinated for diseases that dont exist anymore, seeing as how your all about defending the helpless.

    Cultures are allowed to create their own identity, and if someone doesnt like it, they can leave and raise their own children

  • @BeingInTheMessiah

    You think women like it?

    "There is a huge difference in sex with uncut [natural] and cut [circumcised] men, and most women who’ve had both, prefer uncut. I’ll never have another cut partner. My body can’t handle the rough painful sex they need in order to finally squeeze out a cum, because most of the feeling has been cut away, and they’ve been left dried out and insensitive"

  • @BeingInTheMessiah

    You think women like it?

    "Intercourse with a circumcised man and intercourse with an uncircumcised man are two entirely different experiences. I can always tell from the feeling alone whether or not a man is circumcised. Circumcised men take longer to ejaculate. They have to work at it. (From a conversation with a prostitute)"

  • @BeingInTheMessiah

    You think women like it?

    "One of the keynotes of the book [Sex As Nature Intended It, by Kristen O'Hara] is its unique survey of [138 American] women who have had the comparative experience of sexual intercourse with both circumcised and uncircumcised men. If you’re like the majority of women in the survey, you’ve found intercourse with your “natural” partner a highly rewarding experience—much more pleasurable than the intercourse you experienced with circumcised men"

  • @BeingInTheMessiah

    Here's where we get down to the real nitty gritty: "Cultures are allowed to create their own identity. . . . '

    No they don't. You don't get the right to mark your offspring. All beings are created with certain inalienable rights - one of which is the right to the body given to him by his creator. You have no right to mutilate another man's penis.

    You lose.

  • @jx14aby the creator found it wise and pleasing to circumcise the bodies he gave to his creatures, evidenced by the fact that it is happening (sufficient proof whether or not nature is your creator).

    the nitty gritty is that you hate the god of the bible, because you have chosen to not understand, because you have fallen for the lie that the masses of christians are adherents to the moral imperatives of the bible.

    The kingdom of heaven is logical, not superstitious.

  • @BeingInTheMessiah

    What nonsense. "the creator found it wise and pleasing to circumcise the bodies he gave to his creatures. . . ."

    You can't be serious. And do I hate the god of the bible? The bible is about men - not god. And the evil men do to one another. god is a concept we use to measure our pain.

  • @BeingInTheMessiah

    What nonsense. "the creator found it wise and pleasing to circumcise the bodies he gave to his creatures. . . ."

    You can't be serious. LOL!

  • @BeingInTheMessiah "The kingdom of heaven is logical" well...it's LEADER isn't.

    1. God is all-powerful? Can he create a stone he cannot lift?

    2. God is loving? Enough to know the fates of his play-things but do nothing to stop disaster?

    3. God is all-knowing and all-powerful? So he knows all of his future decisions and yet somehow has the power to change them?

    The god of the bible is illogical, anything illogical, by definition, cannot exist.

    Circumcision is wrong and your god's a cunt.

  • @jx14aby the simple fact that O'Hara identifies "uncircumcised intercourse" as the source of "true lovemaking" discredits her immediately. only the prostitutes and average ignorants (the masses) could come to love because of the sex they are having. Love by definition is unmerited and has no requisites.

  • @BeingInTheMessiah

    Jeez you're slippery.

    You said women like it better with mutilated penises and I proved you wrong. You can keep trying to rationalize what you want to do, but in the end, you have no right to make that decision for another man. His penis. His decision.

  • I find it funny when people say male circumcision is for "health reasons", even though the foreskin is naturally apart of the penis at birth. I haven't had any health problems related to not getting circumcised for the past 18 years. You just have to clean your junk more often, not much of a stretch here.

  • @chyo1

    The sanitation thing is nonsense. I've been with lots of girls and it never occurred to me their pussies should have been sliced apart so they wouldn't smell.

  • Even sicker is when the rabbi cuts off the foreskin he sucks the blood out and swallows it.

  • @elucidative

    Your first blow job! Hahahahahaha!

  • Egyptians in the ancient world cut off the foreskins of their slaves and servants, some were even made into eunichs! OUCH!

  • Christians actually "reading" the Bible?? thats asking too much, lol

  • Rys2sense: Would you label cosmetic surgery "barbaric and pointless"? Male circumcision was not only for a sign of special covenant between Israel and God, but for hygienic reasons. Whether you accept that as valid, it remains the argument.  However, can be no rationale related to covenant nor hygienic for liposuction, tummy tucks, or face-lifts. These "mutilations" of the body are for purely vain reasons. Will you be posting a diatribe against these practices in the near future as well?

  • @sonlover62

    Circumcision is done without the consent of its victim. You want to mutilate your own body, go ahead. But no one has the right to mutilate another man's cock.

  • Unsubscribed. you give me the creeps, its the way you talk, eww.

  • Having just taking obgyn and pediatrics, I have to disagree with this. There is now scientific evidence that demonstrates early in development after no more then the first trimester that stimuli can cause pain. Additionally, there is scientific evidence that demonstrates positives for circumcision, and there is positives against it. Im not against abortion, its a choice, even while im christian, i still believe in the decision to choose. p.s. circumcisions are painful experiences to newborns.

  • @XxgoetfacexX

    "Painful" actually underrates the experience. Nelson Mandela described the experience as "I felt as if fire was shooting through my veins." The pain is excruciating.

  • Wow after reading through these comments I see your a very hate filled little man. Are you a victim of the catholic preists or what? But I do have to agree that there are a whole lot of contradictions between the old and new testaments.

  • Bravo!

    Bravo!

    Bravo!

    I went to a bris once and watched the procedure. The baby screamed for a half hour afterward while the mohel held the little boy and patted him and sang real loud. Then passed the screaming boy to his mother, father, grandma, but the baby wouldn't stop screaming and the mohel wouldn't stop singing. I asked the woman next to me (a judge) "Why isn't this mayhem?" (Mayhem is the cutting or slicing off of another's body part - punishable by prison.)

  • Just the forskins??? Knowing how convoluted the bible is it was probably the whole penis.

    200 hot dogs served on a silver plater. I'm only half circumcised, does that mean I'm only half accepted in 2012??? =)

  • @WhatSayestThou

    Btw I forgive my parents and the doctor that did because I don't even remember the incident.

    Thank You.

  • WhatSayestThou~ Aww man ~forgiveness is the GREATEST gift of ALL ~ so you're definitely on the right path, & according to my personal beliefs, if you wish that nothing had ever been removed from you without your personal choice, in some years (undetermined) to come, you shall be restored to your God intended former glory. I'm not sure about those who've had cosmetic surgery through choice though? Imagine everything being restored to its former glory?

    Some will surely be mortified on the spot!

  • I'm glad my wang was snipped, that is my personal feeling. Hey Ry, shouldn't it be "hands of my penis."

  • @slobknoblin Glad you are glad but the point was it should be up to the individual since it is irreversible.

  • @Rys2sense - I don't necessarily dissagree with you. decissions about ones body should be made by the individual. For me, I'm just glad it was done when i was a baby and don't remember it. If it was a decision I would have to make today I would probably more then likely decline, just because of the hassle of getting it done. I don't dissagree with what you said bout the purpose of it being done.

  • @slobknoblin

    Take a look at jewsagainstcircumcision and learn what you're missing. There's an old saying, "Sex is like pizza. When its good, its great. But when its bad, its still pretty good."

  • "He created the heavens and the earth for a specific purpose, designed you and perfected your design. "

    The QURAN 64:3

    It's not neccessary.

  • did you have circumcision ??? ry

  • subzeroevildusk90000 ~ The mind boggles! What a silly question to even contemplate posing. I mean ... get a life, as Rys would say & has even said to me once! HA HA HA

  • @annie46664 i suport ry his channle is linked in my channle i just woundered if he is agnist circumcision its becous hes parnts did it to him

  • @subzeroevildusk90000 I am against circumcision because it's wrong to do to a person. It's wrong to destroy a part of a person's body when they have no say in the matter and it is ignorant to believe it is for hygiene or lol gawd.

  • I so totally agree with this & was horrified to discover in 1983, that MILLIONS of American & Canadian Christian males are circumcised! WHAT! OMG! How absolutely barbaric. I'm even more irate over this totally unnecessary mutilation, because the lying, thieving HIV & so-called AID$ bandwagon of money-making, genocidal murderers, claim that circumcision prevents the spread of these NON-EXISTENT DISEASES! All pure, fraudulent LIE$ to make more money & cull more Africans in the process.

    SHOCKING!

  • @annie46664 They actually sell the foreskins to be used in other surgeries. It's a market.

  • Rys2sense ~Although I've never considered that for a minute, certainly wouldn't put it past THEM, knowing as much as I do about their sordid INDUSTRY / Corporation!

    It's utterly disgusting & naesuseating, & the sooner folk took their OWN health into their own hands, utilizing the ancient herbal remedies, the better. As for CC ~ God wouldn't have created a foreslin if He didn't have any specific intention & purpose for adorning the male's dominent BRAIN with such!

  • @annie46664

    "if He didn't have any specific intention & purpose for adorning the male's dominent BRAIN with such!"

    LOL - Yep! Just like the skull. But women wouldn't like that.

  • There are plenty of medical reasons for circumcision.

  • TheAntiNICE~ Yeah so RIGHT you are! That blinking oft' lying, money-making medical fraternity don't give a DAMN about their rattled-off Hippocratic Oath ~ long gone are the days when that truly meant anything. Today it's all about making money & so what if innocent people die or suffer the consequences of MAL-treatment! For starters, the MAJORITY of oncologists would NOT accept chemotherapy for themselves or their loves ones, so why ever do unto any other what you wouldn't do to yourself?

    S.A.

  • TheAntiNICE~Secondly, & I'll stop here, otherwise it will take me a couple of days to post all those that I am personally aware of. The majority of oncologists would never suggest nor permit their wives or daughters to endure a mammogram, simply because they KNOW through irrefutable FACTS & stats that mammograms often cause breast cancer! That too is apparently barbaric ~I can't speak from experience, only informed feedback & researched wisdom~ thanks God! The IDENTICAL applies too loads others!

  • @annie46664 - nice point you made here about the fact that "doctors" will treat their trusting patients with barbaric and toxic "cures" they NEVER would give to themselves or their loved ones.

    And how about electroshock? About a decade ago, a group called CCHR made a standing offer to pay $1 million to any shrink who would take a televised ES treatment. To this day, not one of those creatures has stepped up to claim the prize, lol!

  • @TheAntiNICE "plenty of medical reasons for CC" Couldn't say it better! CC protects against exactly 1001 severe diseases. This was all pseudomedically proven, and published on April 1st. It not only does reliably prevent undesired sensatorrhoea, but even more importantly: Hepta- and Octacollism, nocturnal bedwetting, sperm-coiling, and incurable Diphyllotrosis, even! To not mention the salvation of CyrrCummPhobia, that it dreads, and plagues them unCyrrCummCliCed guys with sleepless nights.

  • kleenex3000 ~ OMG! You are too funny, but with sheer brilliance! The world needs MANY more like you, esp. my faved Obama who keeps inadvertently & unwittingly, letting me down some.

    HA HA HA I'm forced now to check out your BIO & see where you hail from & what your 'other' forte is. :)

  • @annie46664 ilike your channle by the way ill sub

  • @kleenex3000 There are cases where circumsision is medically necessary. For example, phimosis is often treated by the removal of the foreskin.

  • @TheAntiNICE Phimosis is not, at least not priori an indication for CC, that there are at least 3 other methods available that save the PrePuce for example triple incision. The subject of this VideoClip is NON MEDICAL and NON VOLUNTARY CC iow an utterly unethic sort of "surgery".

  • @TheAntiNICE NO there are not.

  • @Rys2sense Yes, there are. Phimosis is an example of a condition that usually necessitates circumsion.

  • @TheAntiNICE "Phimosis...uszually necessitates CC"

    With all due respect, plz don't spread medical misinformation.

    Balanitis xerotica obliterans aka "Lichen sclerosis" is an indication for CC

    Phimosis is not. BEWARE of doctors that tell otherwise.

  • @TheAntiNICE

    Why the hell are we born with foreskin if we are supposed to cut it off? it serves a purpose.

  • @Seoshinawi I'm not saying that we are "supposed to cut it off" only that in some cases, it can be an important and necessary medical procedure.

  • Uncircumcised penises simply look better.

    U mad cutfags?

  • Religious people are like the younger sibling who insists that Santa is real when their older brother/sister tell them the truth. Time to start evolving again people, we're still living in the dark ages where race and religion drives a wedge between us and slows us down.

  • @Rys2sense - right on!

    BTW, ever seen this one? /watch?v=YqC73omSk4o

  • @nameofthepen

    I watched. Very funny.

  • @jx14aby - lol. Great. I thought it was a real hoot.

  • Rys2sense: "Give the baby a choice on circumcision"

    But when it comes to abortion I guess the baby doesn't have a choice? right?

    Atheists are fucking hypocrites.

  • @SkyxN3t It this the strategy of Theophrenic People with a Christ-psychosis? I am an individual with a sane mind, IOW: Not-Believer, and I am against Abortion and against M/FG(I)M and I see through YOUR hypocrisy so "STFU".

  • @kleenex3000

    Who are you kidding bitch, the majority of atheists support abortion.

  • @SkyxN3t "majority..." So get yourself comfortable in another superstition, besides your precious belief in an imaginary friend, that he is pleased by praying his glory and by animal sacrifice, control of sexual urges, and sclicing babee'Z private parts and PrePuces of the Heart respectively.

  • Comment removed

  • @SkyxN3t You don't have to be an atheist to be pro-choice and the huge difference there is one is a BABY for CC and the other is an EMBRYO. Religious people are hypocrites and ignorant of science in general.

  • @Rys2sense

    Weren't you an "Embroyo" at one point? If your mommy aborted you, you wouldn't exist right now. HYPOCRITE !

  • @Rys2sense

    The majority of Atheists support the woman's "right" to abortion at all stages. An atheist against abortion is a minority.

  • Respond to this video... NO one advocate aborting a full grown baby. 

  • Sky~You need to read the Matthew Books, which will truthfully teach you, that growing foetuses have one or many SOULS inhabiting them during their growth, with the sole purpose of experiencing that which was inevitably denied them. They then hand over, often at the last minute, just before birth, to the actual soul intended to inhabit that particular Earthling. Although God has NEVER & shall NEVER condone any killing / sacrifice of any of His creations, He does NOT make any judgement either!

  • I don't understand abortion. They say, "it's just a mass of cells, it's not a baby yet." What constitutes a baby as a "baby"? You and I are just a mass of cells with a conscience...we are three buckets of water, and a bucket of minerals with a conscience and we have the fuckin' audacity to say it's ok to mass murder babies because they don't have a conscience yet.

  • @ObamaIsDaAntiChrist It's not a clear black and white line, however certainly before a brain has developed it is not conscious life anymore than the sperm and eggs were before combining.