@fallout3freak360 no thats what the other dumbasses called it. no one knows what the 797 will look like some think it might be the 747 with a full upper deck like the A380(which would most likely be called the 747-1000 or 747-9) or something like the 787 but the size of the 737. who knows.
THE NEW ERA IN AVIATION STARTED in ISRAEL with FIRST-EVER flight of Stealth, Tailless 3D Vectoring [STV]. (May 18, 1987, Av. Week). Facebook video ["Benjamin Gal-Or"] explains Super-Kill-Ratio, Extra TO/L-safety (Civil & military) gained by STV, thereby ending dominance of common stall/spin dangerous aero-control. F-35 & F-22 exploit only part of STV potential [tailless= better stealth, reduced drag/structure/weight/fuel). Cf. X44 MANTA, X47b, RQ170, T50, B2, NGB, FB22, X-48B,C; X-727
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Where do I start? How many things wrong can they get? STOL...forget it. VTOL...no way. They don't have any understanding what needs to happen to "move the state of the art" I do...but taking gov money is illegal. Put it back. Make the product...let the market decided...or get out...Criminal thugs...
No, never worked there...so I could not have been fired. I was once offered a mid level eng. manager job on the 787, but I did not take it...
I believe in PRIVATE transportation...I don't like bus transit. H1N1. schedules, total hassle.
An airliner gets 70 mpg/passenger. To beat an airline one needs to fly about 150 mph door to door and get 70 mpg single person. I think I can do it...
So, if you want to debate the concept...go for it.
no..i'm not interested in debating..besides i'm not into this..it was just your tone that took my attention...i would have said the same in a different way.. ..perhaps..with a little more diplomacy
Tone? Using government money (gun to taxpayer's heads) to fund someone's fun is simple theft. These thugs need to go out and earn it like I did...then go make it on their own dime...like I do...
There is NOTHING to be gained by this BWB design as designed.
They got the funding the same way climegate scum got their money...same as B2 got theirs... fear and political backing.
Engineering seldom is the reason...just rank theft.
@seaplaneguy1..well, this is one point we both do agree over..I would add: creating wars in order to get benefits out of weapon industrie is an even bigger scam!!..buying carbone !!!.....and the latest H1N1 vaccin scam!!...i could go on for hours...the globalisation of this system is on going..and is a US export product...you'll need a revolution to stop this my friend..any how ..best wishes..take care!
Boeing sucking on the gov. tit again. These guys don't know what they are doing. What a waste. Proof that you don't need to be good...just connected to pols with taxpayer's money. I say fire all Congressmen...take out this nonsense garbage. What a joke of an airplane.
@seaplaneguy1 although i do agree to fire all the congressmen, no offense but i personally think your making the project/jet more complicated than what it might be(but in reality who really knows the facts these days?)
The Phoenix from "Gatchaman/Battle of the planets" predicted this body shape 35 years ago;The sooner pencil bodied planes are scrapped the better;Blended is splendid.!
i thought iw was called the 797
fallout3freak360 1 year ago
@fallout3freak360 no thats what the other dumbasses called it. no one knows what the 797 will look like some think it might be the 747 with a full upper deck like the A380(which would most likely be called the 747-1000 or 747-9) or something like the 787 but the size of the 737. who knows.
yoyoyoyoshua 1 year ago
@yoyoyoyoshua oh thanks for explaining that, i have been very confused about this plane
fallout3freak360 1 year ago
@fallout3freak360 your welcome I think that a ton of ppl have been confused about what is gonna be the 797.
yoyoyoyoshua 1 year ago
@yoyoyoyoshua yea, i hope its going to be giant, something to crush airbus
fallout3freak360 1 year ago
@fallout3freak360 From what I've read itis suppost to carry 1000 passengers.
yoyoyoyoshua 1 year ago
@yoyoyoyoshua yeah thats what i hear, if that's true, that will be awesome
fallout3freak360 1 year ago
@fallout3freak360 yeah and they might have to make the gates stronger but thats it since it can use the A380 cause the wing span is the same.
yoyoyoyoshua 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE NEW ERA IN AVIATION STARTED in ISRAEL with FIRST-EVER flight of Stealth, Tailless 3D Vectoring [STV]. (May 18, 1987, Av. Week). Facebook video ["Benjamin Gal-Or"] explains Super-Kill-Ratio, Extra TO/L-safety (Civil & military) gained by STV, thereby ending dominance of common stall/spin dangerous aero-control. F-35 & F-22 exploit only part of STV potential [tailless= better stealth, reduced drag/structure/weight/fuel). Cf. X44 MANTA, X47b, RQ170, T50, B2, NGB, FB22, X-48B,C; X-727
1Bengalor 1 year ago
Dear All,
I have some questions about spychology:
(1) Why do we love flying?
(2) Why do we enjoy to pilot RC aeroplanes?
(3) Why do we like to design and to build our RC areoplanes?
(4) Why do we want to design new aeroplanes?
THANK YOU IN ADVANCE for your creative ideas and brainstorm!!! :)
applesweeter 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Where do I start? How many things wrong can they get? STOL...forget it. VTOL...no way. They don't have any understanding what needs to happen to "move the state of the art" I do...but taking gov money is illegal. Put it back. Make the product...let the market decided...or get out...Criminal thugs...
seaplaneguy1 2 years ago
@seaplaneguy1
let me guess ...you used to work there and you were fired?
micheldezanger 2 years ago
Mich,
No, never worked there...so I could not have been fired. I was once offered a mid level eng. manager job on the 787, but I did not take it...
I believe in PRIVATE transportation...I don't like bus transit. H1N1. schedules, total hassle.
An airliner gets 70 mpg/passenger. To beat an airline one needs to fly about 150 mph door to door and get 70 mpg single person. I think I can do it...
So, if you want to debate the concept...go for it.
Where should we start?
seaplaneguy1 2 years ago
no..i'm not interested in debating..besides i'm not into this..it was just your tone that took my attention...i would have said the same in a different way.. ..perhaps..with a little more diplomacy
micheldezanger 2 years ago
@micheldezanger
Tone? Using government money (gun to taxpayer's heads) to fund someone's fun is simple theft. These thugs need to go out and earn it like I did...then go make it on their own dime...like I do...
There is NOTHING to be gained by this BWB design as designed.
They got the funding the same way climegate scum got their money...same as B2 got theirs... fear and political backing.
Engineering seldom is the reason...just rank theft.
Our system is totally corrupt...wake up.
seaplaneguy1 2 years ago 2
@seaplaneguy1..well, this is one point we both do agree over..I would add: creating wars in order to get benefits out of weapon industrie is an even bigger scam!!..buying carbone !!!.....and the latest H1N1 vaccin scam!!...i could go on for hours...the globalisation of this system is on going..and is a US export product...you'll need a revolution to stop this my friend..any how ..best wishes..take care!
micheldezanger 2 years ago
oh..by the way....i woke up several years ago!!!..and i am alive.....and Kicking!!!! cheers mate..
micheldezanger 2 years ago
@seaplaneguy1 BWB is a better design than normal aircraft at least for its invisioned field. Better lift, efficency etc.
Wait a minute....are you a paulian?
valcan321 1 year ago
Valcan321,
What is a paulian?
No, it is not. This is a government pet project....
seaplaneguy1 1 year ago
im with you brother, are you libertarian by chance?
datzfast 2 years ago
Boeing sucking on the gov. tit again. These guys don't know what they are doing. What a waste. Proof that you don't need to be good...just connected to pols with taxpayer's money. I say fire all Congressmen...take out this nonsense garbage. What a joke of an airplane.
seaplaneguy1 2 years ago
@seaplaneguy1 although i do agree to fire all the congressmen, no offense but i personally think your making the project/jet more complicated than what it might be(but in reality who really knows the facts these days?)
Arvak777 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dear All,
I have two questions about psychology:
(1) Why do we love flying?
(2) Why do we want design and build new aeroplane? what is the motivation?
(3) What is the personal image to be a aerospace engineer?
(4) What will be our expection for future aeroplane?
THANK YOU IN ADVANCE for your creative ideas and brainstrom!!! :)
applesweeter 2 years ago
thats sexy! looks like a manta ray
nicklking 2 years ago
The Phoenix from "Gatchaman/Battle of the planets" predicted this body shape 35 years ago;The sooner pencil bodied planes are scrapped the better;Blended is splendid.!
DFORCE1969 3 years ago
It's even older than that. Look up Northrop YB 49 and Horten Ho 229
Atomicskull 2 years ago
Huge difference between blended wing and flying wing.
sakoshooter48 2 years ago
I'm looking, but have not found any more yet
theworacle 4 years ago
Wow this is so cool! I have been looking everywhere for it!
Where can we go to see more?
MRKNIGHT 4 years ago