When I look at the moon, I see Sarah Palin and Michelle Bachmann eating one another's muff. They are in a northern forest surrounded by many eager beavers.
Our moon is so beautiful! And it's fun trying to scale certain impacts in my mind. I thought that "boulder" was the size of a small rock. Then he said "100 meters!" lol
photot shop is great thing for morons who think we went there..you all have been told so many times it's true your judgment is clouded..You want to believe so much that we did and can do it..all the pics and footage of spaCE ARE altered. hubble is fake as fake gets..you idiots will beleiev anything the gold ole's boys in Dc will tell you..NASA is run by freemasons idiot morons fucking sheep peaple..get a clue and look at FACTS it's impossible to go tot he moon..ompossible fake landing fake fake
@ambush77 The freemasons control the internet too, and they're tracking your every move. They know what you wrote about us... er... I mean "them". They will make a sacrificial example of you. Don't worry though, they'll pay your bills for a year so nobody gets tipped off when you're gone. They'll even feed your lone companion, the iguana you smuggled back from Mexico. Yes! They know about your iguana.
PS: They will send Buzz Aldrin your spleen in a jar to add to his collection.
@ambush77 The only gullible idiot who believes anything he's told is you. You're so dumb that you don't even realize that what you're saying is that every scientist, every physicist and aerospace engineer, every geologist studying the moon, every surveyor of the moon, every observatory and all their staff, all of science is, in fact, fake. Fail.
@ambush77 *photot shop is great thing for morons who think we went there*
Photoshop wasn't around in 1969. Why don't you get a telescope ( a really big one) and do some research for yourself? You diss all of the world's scientific communities, yet igore the thousand upons thousands of amateur astronomers actively involved in discovering our universe. Frankly, I'm sick to fucking death of conspiracy morons like you that have no grip on reality.
lol....you're so blind.My reality is perfectly is check heeep..I have a telescope and I see lies.you think it can't be used now..come on..Scientific communities no not all just the leader of these societies paid to keep up the hoax of space travel...you all want so badly to believe we can do this space stuff...you make yourself think it's true..I love space and would want nothing more than for use to be able to explore but we can't if you're so sick of us stop replying ..idiot
fake landing...shadows...atmosphere impossible to penetrate with the radiation..vanallen belt cannot be passed..radiation would fy the asntroNOTs..shadow on astrontos face is wrong..the jumping they show is wrong clipped slowed to have speed for effect..gravity were real you would be able to jump a lot higher than they di on the vid..moon landing HOAX...meant to distract from the Vietnam War and worked on all you fools who think we went there fucking dolts..
When he said that the crater was nearly four billion years old, that's a religious statement instead of a scientific one because radiometric dating is unreliable since it rests on so many unobservable, untestable, and indemonstrable assumptions such as the rock/whatever was never contaminated, had a certain amount of parent(s) element(s) to start with, and that the decay rate has always been the same. Watch YouTube: CSE-01 Age of the Earth (FULL) Kent Hovind. Subscribe! R u open-minded?
As I watched the video, I could not help but marvel at the number and size of impact craters that have hit the moon...and am vary thankful that it is there to take some impacts and help protect the Earth just a little bit more. Amazing. Thanks for posting.
Google: "The evolution Cruncher" [pdf] or the newer book: "Science vs evolution" [pdf] Subscribe! Are u open-minded? By the way, how can the bar which reads 750 km be correct? What if I placed that bar at the center of the moon versus at its edge? The edge would be more than 750km and the center would be less than 750km even tho the bar's length never changes? Where's the consistency? But still, MASSIVELY AWESOME VIDEO and graphics!
Damn you.. Spacerip.. Can't stop thinking about... Space.. Want to go to moon.. No NO NO NO I SUBSCRIBED nooooo now i have to watch every video you upload because they are SOOOOOO FUCKING AWESOME !!! GJ on every single video , they're amazing !! :D
I love space don't get me wrong. I think the moon is real for the most part..I just find certain things that we are told about it just don't add up to me..And it is very difficult to get answers that are NOT from text books or answers from NASA that are told to us to be common knowledge, so don't question it..I am no math wiz so it makes me finding the answers on my own difficult...especially with youtube people just start talking trash...
@rachmarinof Found a good link for you... search for "librations," and check out the link to NASA.gov. It talks about the how the constant rotational velocity of the moon around its own axis interacts with the varying orbital velocity of the moon around Earth (due to its slightly elliptical orbit) allows us to see more than 50% of the lunar surface from Earth.
@rachmarinof Yes, it does. If it were to not rotate and focus on a fixed point in space then at one side of it's orbit it faces earth at 90* down and at the other side of it's orbit, it faces the fixed point. i.e. directly away from earth, 90* up. In simpler terms, if you stood on a fixed spot, rotating, and someone walked around you without rotating, when they walk in front of you, you see their back but if you turn around when they're the other side you see their face. Do you get me?
Are you confusing motion of an object following a curved path as opposed to spin about its axis? I hope you answered no. So why do you use the same of conditions and principles to validate the Moon's rotation about the Earth and to validate the moon's spin about its axis are in perfect synchronization?
but the ball itself does not spin about its axis. Spin is a relationship between a frame of reference that is within the object in question and its rotation is about a set point within that frame. It is not the motion of the total frame of reference as an object revolves in a circular path around a pivot point the Earth in this case giving the illusion of spin about the axis, when it is a change position due to rotation.
@rachmarinof Try thinking of it with the center of the moon as your frame of reference. In this reference frame, the Earth revolves around the moon. For the moon to maintain a particular facing while the Earth is moving, the moon must rotate about its own axis.
@ZedMikey How can the ball spin on it's axis? If one face of the ball is attached to string then it cannot rotate on 'it's own' axis can it? It isn't physically possible. The moon axis spin theory is based on incorrect mathematical assumptions. I did my research last time I came across this argument! But Peace, debate is fun!
@rachmarinof "How can the ball spin on it's axis? If one face of the ball is attached to string then it cannot rotate on 'it's own' axis can it? It isn't physically possible."
The ball can spin with a string attached because the string is moving. The location of the attachment point of the string rotates around the ball's axis, so the ball has to rotate with it.
Experiment, If you have a stick, attach a line to one of its ends on a pivot point and connect the other end through the center of the a ball and tie off. Revolve the ball about you, does ball spin about its axis? How could it, it is attached to a string. You do see the same face of the ball as it revolves about the holder of the stick. You can validate that a point on the ball when you include yourself and the ball's curved path, does change its position within the greater frame, (cont)
@rachmarinof Yes... the ball DOES spin about its axis. Think of it like this... as you are spinning the ball, the side with the string attached faces south when the ball is north of you. but when the ball is south of you, the side with the string attached faces north. How can that side change from facing south to facing north without rotating?
@Zoharargov On one of the other Youtube moon videos it shows images of alien bases on the moon. I guess that means there must be alien bases on the moon. Because we all know images are 100% irrefutable proof of something existing in reality. There is no way they can be fabricated or manipulated.
@Zoharargov I think the best argument will always be the scientific knowledge we acquired from all the experiments we did in every missions. But this has no value for a conspiracy theorist.
@Zoharargov Nothing will ever put an end to the conspiracy theories. If these people were rational to begin with, there wouldn't ever have been any conspiracy theories at all. Why should this evidence sway the idiots?
@Isaiah6517 the moon is shy to show it's other face... After all there are bases there that house decepticons who lay comatosed cause underground dungeons in Area 51 are hiding the 'all spark' guarded by reptilians who are giving us hints of their existence by starring as Argonians in Bethesda Sofwork's Elder Scrolls rpg series... Its a deep rooted conspiracy friend :s
@Isaiah6517 the moon is shy to show is it's other face... After all there are bases there that house decepticons who lay comatosed cause underground dungeons in Area 51 are hiding the 'all spark' guarded by reptilians who are giving us hints of their existence by starring as Argonians in Bethesda Sofwork's Elder Scrolls rpg series... Its a deep rooted conspiracy friend :s
@Popupkille relentless slaughter of english language friend. My poor english profs would be somesaulting in their graves over this devouring of english language. Peoples is mercilessly trample ours englishes lol
I watched the first moon landing when I was a kid and the only thing I have always wondered is how, right at the end when the lander took off....the camera that was left on the moon tracked them up into space. (watch the old movie) It's the only thing that made me wonder if the theories that we never went there could have any truth.
@peterjol The camera used to record the lunar takeoffs was mounted on the lunar rover, and operated by someone in Mission Control, back in Houston. They filmed the lunar liftoffs on all missions (apollo 15/16/17) that took a rover with them. Videos of all three ascents can be found on Youtube. (cont'd)
@ConsciousAtoms I am not saying I 'believe' the first moon landing WAS a hoax..it's just that when I was 11 years old and watched the camera track the LEM into space ....I thought, 'wow how could they have done that', even more than I thought, 'wow they landed on the moon' ....... at that time calculators were only just being invented!!
(cont) Note that keeping the LM ascent module in sight is actually pretty hard, because of the communications delay between the earth and the moon, but the record shows that they got progressively better at it. During Apollo 15 the camera is fixed, and the LM quickly flies out of the top of the frame. During Apollo 16, the camera pans upward as the LM lifts off, but loses it after just a couple of seconds. During Apollo 17, the camera tracks the LM until after the pitchover maneuver.
Whats this new strange word they are using? Peoples? I thought People was both singular and plural? But then again, I am only Norwegian. What would I know about the English language?
@Popupkille People is the plural of person (yes, persons exists too, but it's used specifically and not often). Peoples refers to different groups of people (also not used often)...it's used correctly here though. Also, as a Norwegian, you probably know a lot about the English language since the peoples of Scandinavia are usually multilingual :-)
@tvswnet Ah. You got me. :P You are right. like "the peoples of Africa" or in your example at the end there, "peoples of Scandinavia" I didn't thing that far. Still. I think that saying "ancient peoples" sounds odd. In my mind, it sounds more natural saying, "ancient people". And yes. We are multi lingual. Not only do we understand English. Most of us also understand Swedish and Danish pretty well, since they are so similar, although different in some aspects.
@decemberbenjamin Oh, but you misunderstand these conspiracy people. Has nothing to do with truth or evidence. It's about feeling part of a small, selected group, who knows how things really works. It's about ego... Many of them will not change their view, no matter what evidence is present. Because this evidence can always be claimed part of the conspiracy.
Amazing! What's almost as amazing are those that insist we never went there. I had to print out a dozen pages or so of positive evidence a few years back & bring them to work to show people that there is more than enough proof for the landings.
Even with this clip, they will still insist it was a hoax. But I'll bet anything them same folks think the U.S. is covering up a captured UFO....
I guess if you can believe that mankind was decieved by a talking snake, anything goes after that.
@ambush77 I saw it live on t.v. in '69. You musta been born after the end of the Cold War.The rivalry between the U.S. & the Russians fell just short of all out nuclear war. The Russians would have been all over a U.S. hoax like flies over shit. It's physically impossible to shoot a 'movie' from the desert & broadcast that to the world, without anyone knowing it was a setup. The Rooskies were very closely monitoring everything the U.S. was doing & vice versa.
@LordSauceness You believe there was a rivalry with Russia because you were told so by your leaders. That doesn't make it true. Seeing something on TV does not make it true. It's easy for organized groups to keep secrets, the military does it every minute of the day. It's easy to get swept up in the propaganda of the day. The Media is excellent at reinforcing it.
@LifePsyop *You believe there was a rivalry with Russia because you were told so by your leaders*
Ya, that wall in Berlin thingy...the Americans & Russians built it together just to fool the whole goddamn world. And the people the Rooskies shot trying to get over that wall were just puppets of propaganda. Damn....they lied to me in school!
@LordSauceness So, in your mind, conflicts around a wall in Berlin equates to Russia and America trying to defeat each other? That's some interesting correlations you're drawing there. Yes they lied to you in school. That's why you went. So you could grow up and parrot everything you read in a history text book. What if Russia didn't want to blow the whistle on an American hoax for any number of reasons? Are you capable of asking questions like that?
@LifePsyop *What if Russia didn't want to blow the whistle on an American hoax for any number of reasons? Are you capable of asking questions like that?*
Sigh... so then, the relatives I had that were living behind the Iron Curtain, they were lying to us? They were so scared of the communists that they refused to talk about it even in the privacy of their living room!
This generation serioulsy has shit-for-brains. The world has been at war for centuries. What's new today? lol...
@LifePsyop *So, in your mind, conflicts around a wall in Berlin equates to Russia and America trying to defeat each other?*
..and Vietnam saw the Rooskies supplying the North.. Was that all part of the 'plan'? Nothing in history is reliable now? What about all of the eye-witnesses from Russia?
Jesus Christ...I can't beleive I'm allowing myself to get sucked into this crap. This just has to be the result of people growing up playing video games and not reading real books.... lmfao....
@LordSauceness Seriously, I'm just asking questions. Why are you so adamant that America and Russia are at real odds with each other and would be looking for any excuse to one-up the other? I'm not saying real conflicts or skirmishes did not take place, but why swallow the whole narrative you are sold, like say the Cuban missile crisis? Do you ever stop to think maybe that was propaganda to scare you and empower both countries military industrial complex? Is that so far-fetched?
No, you have some serious trust issues. Your worldview does not allow you to believe anything historical, correct? Maybe there was no American Civil War? WW 1 & 2 were manufactured just to make money? The Holocaust never happened? 9/11 was rigged etc etc...
You are ingnoring all of the historians who have no bias. But, for recent evnets, you completely dismiss the thousands upon thousands of eye-witnesses to these events!
@LifePsyop *Why are you so adamant that America and Russia are at real odds with each other and would be looking for any excuse to one-up*
They're not-.- now. Do you really think the Cold War was propaganda? Do you know anything about WW 2 & how it ended? The Russian involvement? The Japanese goal of global conquest? You need to read some history books.
Listen, WE'VE BEEN TO THE MOON!. There are scores of scientists who have examined the moon rocks. Were they ALL in on the 'conspiracy?
be that as it may in 1969.it is very easy for the military to pull that type of thing..don't be naive to think they cannot. the whole Russia / US rivalry was a made up to further tension and scare the public into a Nuclear threat. I still do not think we even have Nuclear weapons.If we did have them nobody would use.The governments make $ on War so to completely annihilate the "enemy" is not good for profits.all the foot..the only way went to the moon is if it in our atmosphere
@ambush77 * I still do not think we even have Nuclear weapons*
Ya yer right. Superman got rid of all of them in Superman IV. ....but please don't tell the Japanese about it. They still think they got hit with 2 of them in 1945. ..sssshhhhh!!
@ambush77 Man I expected some good conversations and i get conspiracy theorists like you. I mean you really think we don't have nuclear weapons. What happened to Hiroshima and Nagasaki did they just put on a big light show for the world or something come on think man (or woman).
@Rxkiller27 Carpet bombing.. There is actually testimony from American POWs in Japan that they did not see or hear about a nuke and believed it to be propaganda. Not saying this is proof, but we have no real proof of a nuke, either. Photos of destroyed cities is not evidence of a nuclear weapon. Go watch the old nuke testing videos, some of them are obviously fake.
@LifePsyop *Photos of destroyed cities is not evidence of a nuclear weapon*
Seriously, are you retarted? What about the thousands of Japanese citizens who there at ground zero? The people who lived their lives with radiation sickness? There are momnuments today in Japan of those ruins. This is ALL part of the propaganda to fool the world?
Is there any hope for the future of the world with people thinking this way? How will science progress with retards like this walking the planet??
Here are some gems from you: "... All of the historians who have no bias." "You need to read some history books." Sheesh... And you call be "retarted" ? I have some great snake oil for sale, are you interested?
It's clear that you've read some books and believe them to be the gospel truth. I'm not going to argue with a brick wall. I'm more interested in trying to figure the truth out by being skeptical and asking questions.
@LifePsyop * I'm more interested in trying to figure the truth out by being skeptical and asking questions*
Science, is the ONLY way of knowing. Historians of course, will always have some bias, but in general, they will agree. Your'e not 'skeptical', yer downright icredulous! Denying such facts as the moon landings, nuclear weapons etc is indictitave of a person swallowing the various conspiracy theories that dont' add up.
You discount the very people that can answer your questions!
How on earth can I calm down when I got a kid that makes stupid comments and has no idea of even what The Cold War was all about? Christ...we've got people who have lived under the Iron Curtain, with stories galore...yet you persist in thinking everything you see & hear is rigged!
The simple facts are that we have been to the moon, several times. Every single conspircy objection has been debunked time & again & not even worth talking about. Ba- bye!
@LordSauceness It's simple. Things like The Cuban Missile Crisis was something the military told you was real. It's an act of faith to believe it. It's goofy to give them the benefit of the doubt.
The same goes for NASA. Maybe we did go to the moon, I don't know. One thing I know for sure is that the original Apollo moon-landing videos are silly in how fake they are. It's a joke, but it holds up through social engineering. Clowns like you make fun of people who use their own senses.
@LordSauceness There is no point arguing with him. No matter what concrete evidence you provide, he'll just say no. and If you were to be believed @LifePsyop The human race has never done anything meaningful on video. If your logic was to be believed, we could go to anywhere with a camera, say it's where we are, and your kind would say no, it's fake. The only greater evidence that could be given to you would be to take you there and if you can find the few million dollars, we'd leave you there.
@SImonK1996 The video of the lander blasting off of the surface is a joke. It's a model. The video of the lander hanging out the bay doors as the lunar surface scrolls by below is a joke. It's a green screen. There are transparency issues with the astronauts, you can see the horizon lines through their suits. If you did not know anything about the moon-landings and watched it without the influence of propaganda, you would laugh at it.
Also, I said any concrete evidence, I wasn't referring to anything specific but any reasonable explanation for the videos being fake, have been disproved time and again. It's not like John from the shithole of nowhere has an independent tape of the moonlanding too. NASA have it because NASA went, and you can keep saying this, that, the other but every conspiracy from the flag, the footsteps, the shadows has been proven repeatedly to be false.
@SImonK1996 *There is no point arguing with him. No matter what concrete evidence you provide, he'll just say no...*
I know it and he's just one of very many. But I have to combat bullshit whenever I encounter it to the best of my ability. That's just the way I roll... (^:^)
@LordSauceness I'm not making claims. The claim is that the moon-landing footage we saw on TV was real. But these claims don't hold up, because the footage is laughably fake. Go watch it. They are cheap looking models, cheap looking green screens, transparency artifacts, etc. It's a joke.
Oh, moon rocks! Assuming they exist, guess what one of their sources are? Meteorite craters found on Earth. That's some rock-hard evidence of the moon landings isn't it? I'm sure in your mind it is.
@LifePsyop *Oh, moon rocks! Assuming they exist, guess what one of their sources are? Meteorite craters found on Earth*
Why don't you publish your 'findings' in a peer reviewed geology magazine and see how far you get with your 'thesis'? The only way of knowing is, science. And science proves itself by peer review.i.e. it doesn't matter what you think, if others can't reproduce it, what good is it? Moon rocks from meteroites? You know this, but trained geologists couldn't figure this out?
@LordSauceness The moon rock source being from Earth is mainstream and straight from Wikipedia.
You talk of science more as if it is your religion instead of something you personally understand. Scientists are humans and constrained by whoever is cutting their paychecks. When hundreds of so-called experts are telling me the original moon landings were real, and I can plainly see that the videos are staged fakes, it makes me question a lot of things I am told about the world and our history.
@LifePsyop * I can plainly see that the videos are staged fakes, it makes me question a lot of things I am told about the world and our history*
What makes YOU such an expert? EVERY single hoax objection has been debunked time & again, over & over by many qualified people. What makes you think you are smarter than geologists, astromoners, physicists..& countless others dedictaed to the pursuit of truth?
Science is NOT a relgion, but a way of learning. Something you need to get a grip on
@LordSauceness I have little interest in other hoax claims. Most were probably created by NASA themselves I don't require any input from """""experts""""" to understand that a fake video production is just that. I know this upsets people, but it really is that simple. I readily accept the possibility that man has been to the moon, but the early Apollo footage was certainly fake.
@LifePsyop * I don't require any input from """""experts""""" to understand that a fake video production is just that*
....and exactly HOW do you know this? What methods were used? Can you PROVE your assertions against peer review? You must think that YOU are more expert than the 'experts'! You babble on & on, but yet, I've not seen one piece of concrete evidence from you other than 'you know it's a hoax'. Sorry, I {and the rest of the world} need more than that.
@LordSauceness When you are watching movies, how can you tell something is a miniature model instead of the real thing, real scale? How can you tell something is using green screen instead of being on location? You could point out every clue of such fakery and have an "expert" tell you why you are wrong. At some point you just have to trust your own senses. I can see it is fake, and know that there is monumental national interest in maintaining that it is real. Hence the army of experts.
Really? I don't and neither do a good many others. We've been there, we've got the rocks, the pictures, we even have a laser reflector that was put on there. This is why we know the moon is drifting away, they've been measuring it yearly for the past 35 years or so. You and others stand in the face of reason, logic, & scientific progress. Nasa has all these people working to make CGI movies to fool the whole world and nobody but YOU can see it? lol
@LordSauceness Do you think there is a psychological difference in the viewer between watching any old generic film... and watching a film that your parents, grandparents, national authorities, keep telling you is the real thing? How many people in the latter situation are going to view the film objectively? Do you think you are watching it objectively? I doubt it very much.
And for the millionth time, I'm not saying man has never been to the moon. But the original footage is a joke.
...and I'm still waiting for your reasons 'why' this is so. Everything I've seen is consistent with walking on a low gravity surface. If you can point out all of the 'fake' footage, I'm all eyes...... btw, I've heard & seen most of the hoaxer objections and they all far short in light of scientific examination..
To make you accusations anywhere near credible, you MUST provide some reasons why.
@LordSauceness I don't care about other hoaxer claims. I'm not in a "hoaxer club". We're not a community. I think most of the claims were strawmen created by NASA anyways.
If you want to believe the footage is authentic, you are free to do so. Have fun.
I urge anyone else passing through to go look at the videos of the original lunar Apollo missions and honestly ask yourself if you are watching something real or faked.
@LifePsyop _ So then, we can end this discussion & safely conclued that you have NO good reasons to believe the moon landing clips are authentic other than you 'can tell it's fake'.
If you honestly believe the U.S. actually went to the moon, why on earth would they go through all the trouble of faking the video part of it? The only good reason for faking moon-landing videos would be to cover up the fact they didn't go there, & we know the landings were real You are being very disingenous
I love the moon
pedrogoldfinger 1 day ago
When I look at the moon, I see Sarah Palin and Michelle Bachmann eating one another's muff. They are in a northern forest surrounded by many eager beavers.
ThePayola123 3 weeks ago
Our moon is so beautiful! And it's fun trying to scale certain impacts in my mind. I thought that "boulder" was the size of a small rock. Then he said "100 meters!" lol
GSxxxRGirl 1 month ago
we have actualy a few smaller moons
minecreative123 1 month ago
Muito obrigado por compartilhar o conhecimento.
mariodv500 1 month ago in playlist Mais vídeos de SpaceRip
I Watched today for the 5th time
pikose78 1 month ago
This is a great video!
yanksrulemetssuck27 2 months ago
Beautiful.. Loved it.
G00ndamMister 2 months ago
Hey, what happened to Dick Rodstein? This narrator just reads.
panskeptic 2 months ago
Above ^
As Seen On: The BEST links to click while your STONED
sweatswithhoody 3 months ago 2
photot shop is great thing for morons who think we went there..you all have been told so many times it's true your judgment is clouded..You want to believe so much that we did and can do it..all the pics and footage of spaCE ARE altered. hubble is fake as fake gets..you idiots will beleiev anything the gold ole's boys in Dc will tell you..NASA is run by freemasons idiot morons fucking sheep peaple..get a clue and look at FACTS it's impossible to go tot he moon..ompossible fake landing fake fake
ambush77 3 months ago
@ambush77 The freemasons control the internet too, and they're tracking your every move. They know what you wrote about us... er... I mean "them". They will make a sacrificial example of you. Don't worry though, they'll pay your bills for a year so nobody gets tipped off when you're gone. They'll even feed your lone companion, the iguana you smuggled back from Mexico. Yes! They know about your iguana.
PS: They will send Buzz Aldrin your spleen in a jar to add to his collection.
ryanpiuma 3 months ago 6
@ambush77 The only gullible idiot who believes anything he's told is you. You're so dumb that you don't even realize that what you're saying is that every scientist, every physicist and aerospace engineer, every geologist studying the moon, every surveyor of the moon, every observatory and all their staff, all of science is, in fact, fake. Fail.
ianman6 3 months ago
@ambush77 *photot shop is great thing for morons who think we went there*
Photoshop wasn't around in 1969. Why don't you get a telescope ( a really big one) and do some research for yourself? You diss all of the world's scientific communities, yet igore the thousand upons thousands of amateur astronomers actively involved in discovering our universe. Frankly, I'm sick to fucking death of conspiracy morons like you that have no grip on reality.
LordSauceness 3 months ago 2
@LordSauceness
lol....you're so blind.My reality is perfectly is check heeep..I have a telescope and I see lies.you think it can't be used now..come on..Scientific communities no not all just the leader of these societies paid to keep up the hoax of space travel...you all want so badly to believe we can do this space stuff...you make yourself think it's true..I love space and would want nothing more than for use to be able to explore but we can't if you're so sick of us stop replying ..idiot
ambush77 3 months ago
@ambush77
You sound quite insane.
sdrawkcabgnipytmi 3 months ago 3
@ambush77 You sir, are delusional. I suggest you check yourself in to the next mental asylum, or at least visit a psychiatrist.
Helge129 3 months ago 2
@ambush77 LMAO! When I trip on shrooms, smoke a bowl, then get drunk I start to have thoughts like that too.
UrbanFury12 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ambush77 Somebodies after being on Wikipedia.
Ine7tia 2 months ago
fake landing...shadows...atmosphere impossible to penetrate with the radiation..vanallen belt cannot be passed..radiation would fy the asntroNOTs..shadow on astrontos face is wrong..the jumping they show is wrong clipped slowed to have speed for effect..gravity were real you would be able to jump a lot higher than they di on the vid..moon landing HOAX...meant to distract from the Vietnam War and worked on all you fools who think we went there fucking dolts..
ambush77 3 months ago
@ambush77 and what happened when you woke up?
marko3296 3 months ago
@marko3296
I left your mom in bed alone...sorry
ambush77 3 months ago
@ambush77 So just a bad dream than...good
marko3296 3 months ago
@marko3296
yes it was..i thought she would have been better..but i fact she wasn't..oh well
ambush77 3 months ago
When he said that the crater was nearly four billion years old, that's a religious statement instead of a scientific one because radiometric dating is unreliable since it rests on so many unobservable, untestable, and indemonstrable assumptions such as the rock/whatever was never contaminated, had a certain amount of parent(s) element(s) to start with, and that the decay rate has always been the same. Watch YouTube: CSE-01 Age of the Earth (FULL) Kent Hovind. Subscribe! R u open-minded?
ForeverFlame88 3 months ago
@ForeverFlame88 Kent Hovind?! ROFLMFAO!!!
caporalchef4 1 month ago
As I watched the video, I could not help but marvel at the number and size of impact craters that have hit the moon...and am vary thankful that it is there to take some impacts and help protect the Earth just a little bit more. Amazing. Thanks for posting.
cbemerine 3 months ago
WOW I really love the music accompaniment in this video! How it changes based on locations, and how it fits everywhere, and how it sounds!
I had to watch this twice, because first time, I wasn't really paying attention to the voice, just images and the music
BosakPet 3 months ago 17
Comment removed
ForeverFlame88 3 months ago
Comment removed
ForeverFlame88 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Google: "The evolution Cruncher" [pdf] or the newer book: "Science vs evolution" [pdf] Subscribe! Are u open-minded? By the way, how can the bar which reads 750 km be correct? What if I placed that bar at the center of the moon versus at its edge? The edge would be more than 750km and the center would be less than 750km even tho the bar's length never changes? Where's the consistency? But still, MASSIVELY AWESOME VIDEO and graphics!
ForeverFlame88 3 months ago
Damn you.. Spacerip.. Can't stop thinking about... Space.. Want to go to moon.. No NO NO NO I SUBSCRIBED nooooo now i have to watch every video you upload because they are SOOOOOO FUCKING AWESOME !!! GJ on every single video , they're amazing !! :D
Youtub3rh4x0r 3 months ago
It might have been left by an impact? Id love to know what else could have left that rock there..hmmmm...great vid thx
rickythepitbull 3 months ago
Brilliant.
acerkiwi 3 months ago 11
wow
DoMiNaToR2465 3 months ago
This is amazing, but where's my dinner? :|
nostalgicecho 3 months ago
It's a TRAP!!!!
thekatrinacrew 3 months ago
I love the moon :D! <3
Darisha123 3 months ago
Where are the decepticons?
TheAverageChannelx 3 months ago
finnaly 21st century photo of apollo landings!!! now we know that americans were there
plavins1 3 months ago
Because of how large it is in comparison to other moons, some scientists view the Earth as a dual-planet system. I think that is so friggin' cool. <3
SillyLitleGirl 3 months ago
I had completely forgotten about the moon - thanks for these vids SpaceRip!
Now I gotta check it all out on Google Moon...
Bankstercide 3 months ago
nice propaganda movie you uploaded..such nonsense in this video..
ambush77 3 months ago
@ambush77 So what is your contention--the moon doesn't exist or what?
tvswnet 3 months ago
@tvswnet
I love space don't get me wrong. I think the moon is real for the most part..I just find certain things that we are told about it just don't add up to me..And it is very difficult to get answers that are NOT from text books or answers from NASA that are told to us to be common knowledge, so don't question it..I am no math wiz so it makes me finding the answers on my own difficult...especially with youtube people just start talking trash...
ambush77 3 months ago
@ambush77 A thousand face-palm-emo-cons for you good Sir.
streatlightbmx 3 months ago
@streatlightbmx
right back at ya..
ambush77 3 months ago
Fabulous. Thank you.
LynnColorado 3 months ago
@ZedMikey. A satellite doesn't have to rotate on it's axis in order to continually face towards the earth, does it?
rachmarinof 3 months ago
@rachmarinof Yes, it does. It rotates with a period equal to that of its orbital period. Just like the ball on a string does.
ZedMikey 3 months ago
@rachmarinof Found a good link for you... search for "librations," and check out the link to NASA.gov. It talks about the how the constant rotational velocity of the moon around its own axis interacts with the varying orbital velocity of the moon around Earth (due to its slightly elliptical orbit) allows us to see more than 50% of the lunar surface from Earth.
ZedMikey 3 months ago
@rachmarinof Yes, it does. If it were to not rotate and focus on a fixed point in space then at one side of it's orbit it faces earth at 90* down and at the other side of it's orbit, it faces the fixed point. i.e. directly away from earth, 90* up. In simpler terms, if you stood on a fixed spot, rotating, and someone walked around you without rotating, when they walk in front of you, you see their back but if you turn around when they're the other side you see their face. Do you get me?
SImonK1996 3 months ago
Comment removed
rachmarinof 3 months ago
Are you confusing motion of an object following a curved path as opposed to spin about its axis? I hope you answered no. So why do you use the same of conditions and principles to validate the Moon's rotation about the Earth and to validate the moon's spin about its axis are in perfect synchronization?
rachmarinof 3 months ago
but the ball itself does not spin about its axis. Spin is a relationship between a frame of reference that is within the object in question and its rotation is about a set point within that frame. It is not the motion of the total frame of reference as an object revolves in a circular path around a pivot point the Earth in this case giving the illusion of spin about the axis, when it is a change position due to rotation.
rachmarinof 3 months ago
@rachmarinof Try thinking of it with the center of the moon as your frame of reference. In this reference frame, the Earth revolves around the moon. For the moon to maintain a particular facing while the Earth is moving, the moon must rotate about its own axis.
ZedMikey 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ZedMikey How can the ball spin on it's axis? If one face of the ball is attached to string then it cannot rotate on 'it's own' axis can it? It isn't physically possible. The moon axis spin theory is based on incorrect mathematical assumptions. I did my research last time I came across this argument! But Peace, debate is fun!
rachmarinof 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@rachmarinof "How can the ball spin on it's axis? If one face of the ball is attached to string then it cannot rotate on 'it's own' axis can it? It isn't physically possible."
The ball can spin with a string attached because the string is moving. The location of the attachment point of the string rotates around the ball's axis, so the ball has to rotate with it.
ZedMikey 3 months ago
Experiment, If you have a stick, attach a line to one of its ends on a pivot point and connect the other end through the center of the a ball and tie off. Revolve the ball about you, does ball spin about its axis? How could it, it is attached to a string. You do see the same face of the ball as it revolves about the holder of the stick. You can validate that a point on the ball when you include yourself and the ball's curved path, does change its position within the greater frame, (cont)
rachmarinof 3 months ago
@rachmarinof Yes... the ball DOES spin about its axis. Think of it like this... as you are spinning the ball, the side with the string attached faces south when the ball is north of you. but when the ball is south of you, the side with the string attached faces north. How can that side change from facing south to facing north without rotating?
ZedMikey 3 months ago
What about mystery ruins on the moon and trials?
cata893 3 months ago
i 'like' these videos before i even watch them...never dissapoint
mintmarshall 3 months ago
The moon was an angry moon, last night. It had a demon face and started talking to me. I listened and then tried to burn my house down.
truvelocity 3 months ago
Amazing video! Thank you, SpaceRip, for posting it. What's with the 4 'dislikes' though?
ColdSpot999 3 months ago
@ColdSpot999 Probably hard core christians, ;-)
Dennizjoon 3 months ago
So we can see the Lander and the Jeep thingy? Doesn't that put an end to all the conspiracy theories?
Zoharargov 3 months ago 39
@Zoharargov
No, we cant see it, because it is on the far side of the moon.
thesunofodin 3 months ago
@Zoharargov
not at all..photoshop is a wonderful thing..
ambush77 3 months ago
@Zoharargov On one of the other Youtube moon videos it shows images of alien bases on the moon. I guess that means there must be alien bases on the moon. Because we all know images are 100% irrefutable proof of something existing in reality. There is no way they can be fabricated or manipulated.
LifePsyop 3 months ago
@Zoharargov I think the best argument will always be the scientific knowledge we acquired from all the experiments we did in every missions. But this has no value for a conspiracy theorist.
fl260 3 months ago
@Zoharargov Nothing will ever put an end to the conspiracy theories. If these people were rational to begin with, there wouldn't ever have been any conspiracy theories at all. Why should this evidence sway the idiots?
ml283 3 months ago
Beautiful! My question is: When will my Moon Globe app get that elevation data and more detail like that?!
MrSupercat9 3 months ago
Amazing video spacerip....peace
ISAWORLD2012 3 months ago
Just watched this video for the eleventh time... Amazing video!!
xsoulbluesx 3 months ago
Another great video of SpaceRip!
PraetorianPhalanx 3 months ago
that was amazing!
mitra32203 3 months ago
And then there was the Chuck Norr punched the moon joke that obviously had to be posted haha
xsoulbluesx 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Isaiah6517 the moon is shy to show it's other face... After all there are bases there that house decepticons who lay comatosed cause underground dungeons in Area 51 are hiding the 'all spark' guarded by reptilians who are giving us hints of their existence by starring as Argonians in Bethesda Sofwork's Elder Scrolls rpg series... Its a deep rooted conspiracy friend :s
xsoulbluesx 3 months ago
@Isaiah6517 the moon is shy to show is it's other face... After all there are bases there that house decepticons who lay comatosed cause underground dungeons in Area 51 are hiding the 'all spark' guarded by reptilians who are giving us hints of their existence by starring as Argonians in Bethesda Sofwork's Elder Scrolls rpg series... Its a deep rooted conspiracy friend :s
xsoulbluesx 3 months ago
@Popupkille relentless slaughter of english language friend. My poor english profs would be somesaulting in their graves over this devouring of english language. Peoples is mercilessly trample ours englishes lol
xsoulbluesx 3 months ago
we should try to colonize the moon before Mars.. that'll be cool to have a green moon. :D
skybite95 3 months ago
@skybite95 That would be physically impossible. Sorry. Unless we turned the whole thing into an airtight greenhouse
Keinlicht 3 months ago
MORE ABOUT THE MYSTERIOUS SHADOWS!!!!
NoeLPZC 3 months ago
So, what's on the other side of that thing?
Mosgaard 3 months ago
The moon is such a hottie!
JackeShanTwo 3 months ago
I watched the first moon landing when I was a kid and the only thing I have always wondered is how, right at the end when the lander took off....the camera that was left on the moon tracked them up into space. (watch the old movie) It's the only thing that made me wonder if the theories that we never went there could have any truth.
peterjol 3 months ago
@peterjol The camera used to record the lunar takeoffs was mounted on the lunar rover, and operated by someone in Mission Control, back in Houston. They filmed the lunar liftoffs on all missions (apollo 15/16/17) that took a rover with them. Videos of all three ascents can be found on Youtube. (cont'd)
ConsciousAtoms 3 months ago
@ConsciousAtoms I am not saying I 'believe' the first moon landing WAS a hoax..it's just that when I was 11 years old and watched the camera track the LEM into space ....I thought, 'wow how could they have done that', even more than I thought, 'wow they landed on the moon' ....... at that time calculators were only just being invented!!
peterjol 3 months ago
(cont) Note that keeping the LM ascent module in sight is actually pretty hard, because of the communications delay between the earth and the moon, but the record shows that they got progressively better at it. During Apollo 15 the camera is fixed, and the LM quickly flies out of the top of the frame. During Apollo 16, the camera pans upward as the LM lifts off, but loses it after just a couple of seconds. During Apollo 17, the camera tracks the LM until after the pitchover maneuver.
ConsciousAtoms 3 months ago
very good
TheCoramitch 3 months ago
Whats this new strange word they are using? Peoples? I thought People was both singular and plural? But then again, I am only Norwegian. What would I know about the English language?
Popupkille 3 months ago in playlist [Newz] 4
@Popupkille Just in case you haven't heard, it normally is, but some people I guess say it like that. :/
CodCats 3 months ago
@Popupkille People is the plural of person (yes, persons exists too, but it's used specifically and not often). Peoples refers to different groups of people (also not used often)...it's used correctly here though. Also, as a Norwegian, you probably know a lot about the English language since the peoples of Scandinavia are usually multilingual :-)
tvswnet 3 months ago
@tvswnet Ah. You got me. :P You are right. like "the peoples of Africa" or in your example at the end there, "peoples of Scandinavia" I didn't thing that far. Still. I think that saying "ancient peoples" sounds odd. In my mind, it sounds more natural saying, "ancient people". And yes. We are multi lingual. Not only do we understand English. Most of us also understand Swedish and Danish pretty well, since they are so similar, although different in some aspects.
Popupkille 3 months ago
@Popupkille Peoples are multiple groups of people. But I'm sure thats already been mentioned.
XtremeGoose 3 months ago
nice
PEKET0 3 months ago
Thank You ♥
stramster1 3 months ago
Incredible. As an amatuer astronomer I thought I had seen everyone from the moon. You really blew my mind away!
JackeShanTwo 3 months ago
doesn't this prove that NASA did land on the moon ? where are there still controversies with this issue ?
decemberbenjamin 3 months ago
@decemberbenjamin Oh, but you misunderstand these conspiracy people. Has nothing to do with truth or evidence. It's about feeling part of a small, selected group, who knows how things really works. It's about ego... Many of them will not change their view, no matter what evidence is present. Because this evidence can always be claimed part of the conspiracy.
HKragh 3 months ago 3
Excellent
exarmyboy1996 3 months ago
I'll see you on the dark side.
culwin 3 months ago
The moon is A LOT bigger than most people realize. The zoom out from the Apollo landing artifacts reveals that quite nicely.
BigMTBrain 3 months ago
Amazing! What's almost as amazing are those that insist we never went there. I had to print out a dozen pages or so of positive evidence a few years back & bring them to work to show people that there is more than enough proof for the landings.
Even with this clip, they will still insist it was a hoax. But I'll bet anything them same folks think the U.S. is covering up a captured UFO....
I guess if you can believe that mankind was decieved by a talking snake, anything goes after that.
LordSauceness 3 months ago
@LordSauceness
Positive evidence from whom?? NASA please go back to school..you are so naive and gullible.
ambush77 3 months ago
@ambush77 I saw it live on t.v. in '69. You musta been born after the end of the Cold War.The rivalry between the U.S. & the Russians fell just short of all out nuclear war. The Russians would have been all over a U.S. hoax like flies over shit. It's physically impossible to shoot a 'movie' from the desert & broadcast that to the world, without anyone knowing it was a setup. The Rooskies were very closely monitoring everything the U.S. was doing & vice versa.
Get yer head outta the sand!
LordSauceness 3 months ago
@LordSauceness You believe there was a rivalry with Russia because you were told so by your leaders. That doesn't make it true. Seeing something on TV does not make it true. It's easy for organized groups to keep secrets, the military does it every minute of the day. It's easy to get swept up in the propaganda of the day. The Media is excellent at reinforcing it.
LifePsyop 3 months ago
@LifePsyop *You believe there was a rivalry with Russia because you were told so by your leaders*
Ya, that wall in Berlin thingy...the Americans & Russians built it together just to fool the whole goddamn world. And the people the Rooskies shot trying to get over that wall were just puppets of propaganda. Damn....they lied to me in school!
LordSauceness 3 months ago
@LordSauceness So, in your mind, conflicts around a wall in Berlin equates to Russia and America trying to defeat each other? That's some interesting correlations you're drawing there. Yes they lied to you in school. That's why you went. So you could grow up and parrot everything you read in a history text book. What if Russia didn't want to blow the whistle on an American hoax for any number of reasons? Are you capable of asking questions like that?
LifePsyop 3 months ago
@LifePsyop *What if Russia didn't want to blow the whistle on an American hoax for any number of reasons? Are you capable of asking questions like that?*
Sigh... so then, the relatives I had that were living behind the Iron Curtain, they were lying to us? They were so scared of the communists that they refused to talk about it even in the privacy of their living room!
This generation serioulsy has shit-for-brains. The world has been at war for centuries. What's new today? lol...
LordSauceness 3 months ago
@LifePsyop *So, in your mind, conflicts around a wall in Berlin equates to Russia and America trying to defeat each other?*
..and Vietnam saw the Rooskies supplying the North.. Was that all part of the 'plan'? Nothing in history is reliable now? What about all of the eye-witnesses from Russia?
Jesus Christ...I can't beleive I'm allowing myself to get sucked into this crap. This just has to be the result of people growing up playing video games and not reading real books.... lmfao....
LordSauceness 3 months ago
@LordSauceness Seriously, I'm just asking questions. Why are you so adamant that America and Russia are at real odds with each other and would be looking for any excuse to one-up the other? I'm not saying real conflicts or skirmishes did not take place, but why swallow the whole narrative you are sold, like say the Cuban missile crisis? Do you ever stop to think maybe that was propaganda to scare you and empower both countries military industrial complex? Is that so far-fetched?
LifePsyop 3 months ago
@LifePsyop Why would anyone stop to think that maybe something that happened so many years ago was propaganda?
MrVaddiReddy 3 months ago
@LifePsyop *Seriously, I'm just asking questions*
No, you have some serious trust issues. Your worldview does not allow you to believe anything historical, correct? Maybe there was no American Civil War? WW 1 & 2 were manufactured just to make money? The Holocaust never happened? 9/11 was rigged etc etc...
You are ingnoring all of the historians who have no bias. But, for recent evnets, you completely dismiss the thousands upon thousands of eye-witnesses to these events!
LordSauceness 3 months ago
@LifePsyop *Why are you so adamant that America and Russia are at real odds with each other and would be looking for any excuse to one-up*
They're not-.- now. Do you really think the Cold War was propaganda? Do you know anything about WW 2 & how it ended? The Russian involvement? The Japanese goal of global conquest? You need to read some history books.
Listen, WE'VE BEEN TO THE MOON!. There are scores of scientists who have examined the moon rocks. Were they ALL in on the 'conspiracy?
LordSauceness 3 months ago
@LordSauceness
be that as it may in 1969.it is very easy for the military to pull that type of thing..don't be naive to think they cannot. the whole Russia / US rivalry was a made up to further tension and scare the public into a Nuclear threat. I still do not think we even have Nuclear weapons.If we did have them nobody would use.The governments make $ on War so to completely annihilate the "enemy" is not good for profits.all the foot..the only way went to the moon is if it in our atmosphere
ambush77 3 months ago
@ambush77 * I still do not think we even have Nuclear weapons*
Ya yer right. Superman got rid of all of them in Superman IV. ....but please don't tell the Japanese about it. They still think they got hit with 2 of them in 1945. ..sssshhhhh!!
LordSauceness 3 months ago
@ambush77 Man I expected some good conversations and i get conspiracy theorists like you. I mean you really think we don't have nuclear weapons. What happened to Hiroshima and Nagasaki did they just put on a big light show for the world or something come on think man (or woman).
Rxkiller27 3 months ago
@Rxkiller27 Carpet bombing.. There is actually testimony from American POWs in Japan that they did not see or hear about a nuke and believed it to be propaganda. Not saying this is proof, but we have no real proof of a nuke, either. Photos of destroyed cities is not evidence of a nuclear weapon. Go watch the old nuke testing videos, some of them are obviously fake.
LifePsyop 3 months ago
@LifePsyop Your obviously fake.
djmanley27 3 months ago
@LifePsyop *Photos of destroyed cities is not evidence of a nuclear weapon*
Seriously, are you retarted? What about the thousands of Japanese citizens who there at ground zero? The people who lived their lives with radiation sickness? There are momnuments today in Japan of those ruins. This is ALL part of the propaganda to fool the world?
Is there any hope for the future of the world with people thinking this way? How will science progress with retards like this walking the planet??
LordSauceness 3 months ago
@LordSauceness Wow, calm down.
Here are some gems from you: "... All of the historians who have no bias." "You need to read some history books." Sheesh... And you call be "retarted" ? I have some great snake oil for sale, are you interested?
It's clear that you've read some books and believe them to be the gospel truth. I'm not going to argue with a brick wall. I'm more interested in trying to figure the truth out by being skeptical and asking questions.
LifePsyop 3 months ago
@LifePsyop * I'm more interested in trying to figure the truth out by being skeptical and asking questions*
Science, is the ONLY way of knowing. Historians of course, will always have some bias, but in general, they will agree. Your'e not 'skeptical', yer downright icredulous! Denying such facts as the moon landings, nuclear weapons etc is indictitave of a person swallowing the various conspiracy theories that dont' add up.
You discount the very people that can answer your questions!
LordSauceness 3 months ago
@LifePsyop *Wow, calm down*
How on earth can I calm down when I got a kid that makes stupid comments and has no idea of even what The Cold War was all about? Christ...we've got people who have lived under the Iron Curtain, with stories galore...yet you persist in thinking everything you see & hear is rigged!
The simple facts are that we have been to the moon, several times. Every single conspircy objection has been debunked time & again & not even worth talking about. Ba- bye!
LordSauceness 3 months ago
@LordSauceness It's simple. Things like The Cuban Missile Crisis was something the military told you was real. It's an act of faith to believe it. It's goofy to give them the benefit of the doubt.
The same goes for NASA. Maybe we did go to the moon, I don't know. One thing I know for sure is that the original Apollo moon-landing videos are silly in how fake they are. It's a joke, but it holds up through social engineering. Clowns like you make fun of people who use their own senses.
LifePsyop 3 months ago
@LifePsyop * Clowns like you make fun of people who use their own senses.*
Making accusations is one thing. Proving them is another. This you have not done, nor have you addressed the issue of eye-witness testimony.
We have the moon rocks, they have been examined by many independant scientists. Why is that so difficult for you to grasp?
LordSauceness 3 months ago
@LordSauceness There is no point arguing with him. No matter what concrete evidence you provide, he'll just say no. and If you were to be believed @LifePsyop The human race has never done anything meaningful on video. If your logic was to be believed, we could go to anywhere with a camera, say it's where we are, and your kind would say no, it's fake. The only greater evidence that could be given to you would be to take you there and if you can find the few million dollars, we'd leave you there.
SImonK1996 3 months ago
@SImonK1996 What concrete evidence? A movie? The "most historic videos in American history" that Nasa LOST??
I'm not claiming to know absolutely if man has really been to the moon or not, maybe we have! But the early Apollo footage is a friggin' joke. Period.
LifePsyop 3 months ago
@LifePsyop By what measure was it a joke? Just asking?
SImonK1996 3 months ago
@SImonK1996 The video of the lander blasting off of the surface is a joke. It's a model. The video of the lander hanging out the bay doors as the lunar surface scrolls by below is a joke. It's a green screen. There are transparency issues with the astronauts, you can see the horizon lines through their suits. If you did not know anything about the moon-landings and watched it without the influence of propaganda, you would laugh at it.
LifePsyop 3 months ago
Also, I said any concrete evidence, I wasn't referring to anything specific but any reasonable explanation for the videos being fake, have been disproved time and again. It's not like John from the shithole of nowhere has an independent tape of the moonlanding too. NASA have it because NASA went, and you can keep saying this, that, the other but every conspiracy from the flag, the footsteps, the shadows has been proven repeatedly to be false.
SImonK1996 3 months ago
@SImonK1996 *There is no point arguing with him. No matter what concrete evidence you provide, he'll just say no...*
I know it and he's just one of very many. But I have to combat bullshit whenever I encounter it to the best of my ability. That's just the way I roll... (^:^)
LordSauceness 3 months ago
@LordSauceness The interwebs need more people like you!
SImonK1996 3 months ago
@LordSauceness I'm not making claims. The claim is that the moon-landing footage we saw on TV was real. But these claims don't hold up, because the footage is laughably fake. Go watch it. They are cheap looking models, cheap looking green screens, transparency artifacts, etc. It's a joke.
Oh, moon rocks! Assuming they exist, guess what one of their sources are? Meteorite craters found on Earth. That's some rock-hard evidence of the moon landings isn't it? I'm sure in your mind it is.
LifePsyop 3 months ago
@LifePsyop *Oh, moon rocks! Assuming they exist, guess what one of their sources are? Meteorite craters found on Earth*
Why don't you publish your 'findings' in a peer reviewed geology magazine and see how far you get with your 'thesis'? The only way of knowing is, science. And science proves itself by peer review.i.e. it doesn't matter what you think, if others can't reproduce it, what good is it? Moon rocks from meteroites? You know this, but trained geologists couldn't figure this out?
LordSauceness 3 months ago
@LordSauceness The moon rock source being from Earth is mainstream and straight from Wikipedia.
You talk of science more as if it is your religion instead of something you personally understand. Scientists are humans and constrained by whoever is cutting their paychecks. When hundreds of so-called experts are telling me the original moon landings were real, and I can plainly see that the videos are staged fakes, it makes me question a lot of things I am told about the world and our history.
LifePsyop 3 months ago
@LifePsyop * I can plainly see that the videos are staged fakes, it makes me question a lot of things I am told about the world and our history*
What makes YOU such an expert? EVERY single hoax objection has been debunked time & again, over & over by many qualified people. What makes you think you are smarter than geologists, astromoners, physicists..& countless others dedictaed to the pursuit of truth?
Science is NOT a relgion, but a way of learning. Something you need to get a grip on
LordSauceness 3 months ago
@LordSauceness I have little interest in other hoax claims. Most were probably created by NASA themselves I don't require any input from """""experts""""" to understand that a fake video production is just that. I know this upsets people, but it really is that simple. I readily accept the possibility that man has been to the moon, but the early Apollo footage was certainly fake.
LifePsyop 3 months ago
@LifePsyop * I don't require any input from """""experts""""" to understand that a fake video production is just that*
....and exactly HOW do you know this? What methods were used? Can you PROVE your assertions against peer review? You must think that YOU are more expert than the 'experts'! You babble on & on, but yet, I've not seen one piece of concrete evidence from you other than 'you know it's a hoax'. Sorry, I {and the rest of the world} need more than that.
LordSauceness 3 months ago
@LordSauceness When you are watching movies, how can you tell something is a miniature model instead of the real thing, real scale? How can you tell something is using green screen instead of being on location? You could point out every clue of such fakery and have an "expert" tell you why you are wrong. At some point you just have to trust your own senses. I can see it is fake, and know that there is monumental national interest in maintaining that it is real. Hence the army of experts.
LifePsyop 3 months ago
@LifePsyop * I can see it is fake,..*
Really? I don't and neither do a good many others. We've been there, we've got the rocks, the pictures, we even have a laser reflector that was put on there. This is why we know the moon is drifting away, they've been measuring it yearly for the past 35 years or so. You and others stand in the face of reason, logic, & scientific progress. Nasa has all these people working to make CGI movies to fool the whole world and nobody but YOU can see it? lol
LordSauceness 3 months ago
@LordSauceness Do you think there is a psychological difference in the viewer between watching any old generic film... and watching a film that your parents, grandparents, national authorities, keep telling you is the real thing? How many people in the latter situation are going to view the film objectively? Do you think you are watching it objectively? I doubt it very much.
And for the millionth time, I'm not saying man has never been to the moon. But the original footage is a joke.
LifePsyop 3 months ago
@LifePsyop *But the original footage is a joke*
...and I'm still waiting for your reasons 'why' this is so. Everything I've seen is consistent with walking on a low gravity surface. If you can point out all of the 'fake' footage, I'm all eyes...... btw, I've heard & seen most of the hoaxer objections and they all far short in light of scientific examination..
To make you accusations anywhere near credible, you MUST provide some reasons why.
LordSauceness 3 months ago
@LordSauceness I don't care about other hoaxer claims. I'm not in a "hoaxer club". We're not a community. I think most of the claims were strawmen created by NASA anyways.
If you want to believe the footage is authentic, you are free to do so. Have fun.
I urge anyone else passing through to go look at the videos of the original lunar Apollo missions and honestly ask yourself if you are watching something real or faked.
LifePsyop 3 months ago
@LifePsyop _ So then, we can end this discussion & safely conclued that you have NO good reasons to believe the moon landing clips are authentic other than you 'can tell it's fake'.
If you honestly believe the U.S. actually went to the moon, why on earth would they go through all the trouble of faking the video part of it? The only good reason for faking moon-landing videos would be to cover up the fact they didn't go there, & we know the landings were real You are being very disingenous
LordSauceness 3 months ago
Lovely tour. I've always been fascinated by moon. Thanks!
mickeypopa 3 months ago
Why was there no trails leading to where the rover is?
PeterD2S 3 months ago
But where is the transformers ship?
smantoff 3 months ago 29
@smantoff did u not see tranformers3? it's on the dark side so u cant see it, duh...
d00m0racl3 3 months ago
@smantoff They didn't go on the dark side of the moon lol :D
DaedalusTV 3 months ago
The moon was nice last night.. :D
cazybeast2 3 months ago 33
@cazybeast2 ikr And was on the constellation Taurus. :D
BlossomWolf5 3 months ago
So when will the nuclear drilling commence?
mrteemumilto 3 months ago
chuck norris once used the moon as punching bag that's why there's lots of craters there.
cruxader27 3 months ago
Just wonderful.
SuperSoylent2 3 months ago
Magnificent. Thank you.
philhellenes 3 months ago
Very nice :)
MrpuGsi 3 months ago
any official comment on apollo 20 maybe? :D
ArtKosarev 3 months ago
why is our moon perfectly circle like a planet?? anyone??
makes me want to think that it is a dwarf planet and has been caught in earth's orbit XD
eeskaatt 3 months ago
@eeskaatt Billions of years ago, our planet was crashed by a Mars-sized planet. And the debree turned into the moon millions of years afterwards. :P
BlossomWolf5 3 months ago
Beautiful!!
mjusiqtube 3 months ago
Incredible.
FlyingBandicoot 3 months ago
you forgot to show us the alien buildings at the backside of the moon.
LiveToby 3 months ago
The moon is all dusty. We need a new one. =)
sappha58 3 months ago 2
@sappha58 Or we could just send more people there to clean it up! :D
HeinusHoratius 3 months ago
and why is the backside dark ???
ONPRIEL 3 months ago