Sequences 8: Fractals 2

[blondu88neuroni]

three fours sounds kinda like trifoce

[DroopyDog17]

infinity just means undefined value, you will always have value, and it is not 0 but .something

[geurgeury]

three fourths=triforce

[fathomtheuniverse]

thanks for this, you are really helping me here!!

[gzamora990]

the graph of the function y=(3/4)^x you did is wrong, when x=0, y=1 then the y-intercept is 1 and your graph aproaches to infinity when x=0???

[richardmtl]

too lazy to do the video over again



[velociraptorTheone]

greattttttttttttt!!!!!!!!!!!!!­!!!!!!!

[gregryf]

When you corrected your graph, the resulting line looked like it might form a parabola. Is that right?

[CrypTiKGaming]

@gregryf no, the graph is not parabolic because it must be a quadratic and therefore must be squared. There is no square in y = 3/4^x. This is called an asymptotic relation, I believe. In order for it to be a parabola, both sides must be equal. To simplify; the word para means equal ... that's why when you square 9 for example, you get two equal 3's. Sorry if this is confusing. Hope I helped.

[furyberserk]

So religions and heretics are correct! God is everything in existence, but he does not exist!!!

[jordaniothefourth]

Great set of videos! Thanks

[Capeau]

here is somethig i dont understand... how can it have 0 area? thats impossible

[jmaioran]

@Capeau

I wouldn't get confused with the language. If this were a triangular piece of swiss cheese, if you iterated this method an infinite amount of times, you theoretically would have nothing but skin/peel left.

[PhotoFilmEffect]

you're amazing, Thank You So Much!!!!

[MrRtomic]

WTF... sierpisnki-triangle with negative area`? pardon, but this can't be right... how should an area be negative? an interation -1 is stupid and useless too

[alexdenton02]

@MrRtomic I doubt he was suggesting Sierpisnki-Triangle has negative area. It's my understanding that he was showing you the graph of the function inferred from logic. Which was (3/4)^x. If you pop that into the calculator it's not going to say "WTF negative area!?!" It will just pop out that graph. But you are right, negative area/iteration = no. lol

[MrRtomic]

@alexdenton02 yes, but iteration is defined in N, so, visialising the area with a function is nonsence^^

[silverqumera]

@MrRtomic Boooooh!!! This area is never negative, (3/4)^(-1)=4/3>0... is always positive (3/4)^n!!!!! ¿¿¿??? " interation -1 is stupid"... not... your comment is stupid!!!

[elementoxygen]

I greatly admire how you explain things (especially math) 8D!

[flex4life]

This is spiritual math!

[bigchunk1]

Looks like the triforce, cool concept

[Cagebreaker21]

wouldnt the surface area be 0 not infinite?

[fpsully]

You're correct. The area of the Sierpinski Pyramid is zero, not infinite. The length is infinite, and the Hausdorff dimension is two. Google Sierpinski Pyramid and you'll find a website which explains this.

[BurningFetuses]

@Cagebreaker21 surface area is for 3d objects

[debunker1905]

You're a very good teacher. Keep it up, I've learned a lot with you thank you.

[destinyuraqte]

i can do this on my head... I notice... thanks for the new results

[mathmit]

There's nothing you can do that can't be done.

[scientistwriter]

You are awesome man! I've signed up for your website too.

[dungeonmunky]

I'm glad you picked up on that mistake in the graph, it was bothering me :)

[garybooker]

Fractals are definitely among my favorite topics.  :)

[alfwiz]

Thanks sir, please keep them coming.

[Redix90]

si erers tan listo explica que somos de donde venimos y la infinidad del universo matematicas solo sirve para capitalistas contar con ambicion todo

[destinyuraqte]

que te pasa por que eres asi vamos hagamos una sequencia entonces vamo!!!

[suphysis]

Estúpido!