Added: 3 years ago
From: misesmedia
Views: 5,543
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (63)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • does anyone know the name of the song in the beginning?

  • Guys, you're doing one thing essentially wrong: You shouldn't be talking to people who basically agree to your ideas, you should be talking to people who have no idea about autrian economics.......in case you're not doing that already...

  • the Libertarian party could be a more viable if they acknowledge the validity of the government's role in maintaining civil liberties, economic justice and fair competitive markets.

    You obviously do not understand libertarian thought. If libertarians admitted this then they would not be libertarians. I would never admit this because it is false. O and btw electing sociologists and profs into office?? good lord then it would be 10 times worse. I attend college, profs are full of shit.

  • Profs are not specialists in planning though. The market is "planned chaos." Organization of society did not come from the top down, it came from the bottom up. Libertarian philosophy is the philosophy of freedom, and I say freedom is very practical. What makes people think that these angels will come down and plan everything for us? Let the market work. Most profs. spout the pro-liberal big government agenda; because the schools are run by the state. The state has an interest in keeping power

  • The market is not planned chaos, it is unplanned order when it is free.

  • Wrong about government role. Except maybe civil liberties.  But enforcing civil liberties for the government really just means stopping itself from disobeying the constitution.

    "Economic justice" is a vague, opinionated, arbitrary, emotionalist statement. It means whatever the user of it wants it to mean. I am shocked that a self-described aristotlean would even use such a term. Such a term tends to be spewed by leftists.

  • And I really hat to nit-pick, but you are so supercilious with almost nothing to back it up. I know that there are differences "according to your vocality [sic?], and vicinity", but the language of the people in question is called SPANISH.

  • oops, "HATE to nit-pick"

  • Irrigated pancake is the king!!!! A little knowledge is a dangerous thing!!!

  • You are not speaking clearly, so if my knowledge is incomplete, you haven't done much to remedy that.

  • Your intellectual laziness is not my resposibility.

  • (scoff) Everyone's lazy who haven't the time to decipher your ramblings.

  • The plagiaristic mpolzkill: In this venue words like "your" and "Capitolism" reach beyond specficity. First is "your" It is wrong but for expediancy sake gets it done... Words like "Capitolism" Capitalism" are spelled differently according to your vocality, and vicinity. Not unlike "color". But to the point. If you cant decipher the ramblings, then maybe they should of held you back a grade. You need help, have a question, Dont "Brood" I said "BRUDE" you fuckin retard!!!!!!!

  • Your nickel ante quotes and the simplistic diatribe that stems from that book you read are painfully obvious. Batch up dude, you get your meaning from a "google" search? You even know what brude is? Whatever the internet tell's you is gospel I guess. The neo intellectual is far from it.

  • What book? The dictionary? ("Capitol" & "capital" have their own "specific" definitions in English, oh learned one. That still is the main language in Canada isn't it? French Canadian? And please I always wish to learn new words. I know what "brood" means. What does "brude" mean?)

    Don't get so upset ("f****n' retard", very intellectual), I'll leave you alone, I'm beginning to understand. I just thought you were an average liberal arts victim, but apparently you're insane.

  • What dictionary? Never claimed to be intellectual. (you love me?) Insane is a stronger possibility. The point has gone astray to defend your ego it seems. You just wanna fight me then? Martin Fridzin is the essence of my initial disdain. As far as your concerned. I was ascertaining to how you always bare allegiance to a dissident ideology and broad scale blame like you own things?, or the meaning?? Very odd. And if one was to make psychological accusation, You would be at the forefront

  • ? Tell us English isn't your first language & we'll cut you some slack. You don't make any sense. "Dictionary" was a joke (hilarious that you call OTHERS "literalists") YOU said "THAT book that [I] read". I had no idea what book that was, so I made a joke. Again, I can't address most of what you say because it is incoherent, but if you don't claim to be an "intellectual" how can you say to "IP": "Quit playing like an intellectual and work on actually becoming it". Are you in a position to judge?

  • There are no responsibilities in a conversation. You can either try to communicate to others what is in your head and judge your success by if the concept was understood or you can make statements and not care if they are understood. In the latter case why speak at all?

  • Well put, "IP"

  • Thanks to the Mises Institute for making these videos available on youtube.

    Anyone interested in more videos of great libertarian speakers should look up the Future of Freedom Foundation, also available here on youtube.

  • BROOD?

  • I get the government you keep voting for. Stop it!

  • So you're happy with everything your government does or is there still too much capitalism corrupting the world you are imagining?

    I'm curious about how you know so much about me that you know I deserve the consequences of the choices of the majority of about 60% of the population (choices of 30% of the population)?

  • Give your fucking head a shake. You gotta research everything I say. And then the sad realization of it's truth makes the feeble position unworthy

  • I don't think you realize to whom this video is directed. Look at mises,org. I bet you and they have many common enemies.

    I saw a few Ron Paul videos in your favorites. I supported him and through that learned about austrian economics, which he promotes.

  • Green Day doesn't speak anything of substance. Neither do 99% of any hollywood or entertainment douchebags. I happened to read somewhere that the lead singer of Green Day is libertarian, and I highly doubt he knows what libertarian means.

  • cute

  • Great stereotype...

  • I agree that highlighting problems without acting is pointless, if that's what you mean by bread and circus, but you might be surprised to hear that not all action must be sanctioned or exerted by a government. Sometimes people can do things all by them selves.

  • Bread and circus' is what your fed, and I'm not surprised. The neo solution seems to post atypical rhetoric on the internet as some form of "action". It's a good start, and a great medium, next step would be actual discernment of message. If you despise Capitolism as you claim, then you should be able to see through shit like this?? This is obvious problematic disclosure. I'm sure the next campaign for leadership will claim  "CHANGE". Stockholm syndrome has many variations it seems???

  • When did he claim to despise capitalism? It would seem that you are the one spouting rhetoric.

  • Capitolism is inherent in American Government and my take was an expedient response to "pancake"'s thinking I'm A Leech to the position he assumed of my governmental regard... Your strict literalism makes you a valuable candidate for the wrong. Your a supposed "Libertarian"?

  • seditionape: I can't make heads or tails out of what you're saying & you have a complete disregard for spelling. You MUST be a genius.

  • mpolzkill: You cant make heads or tails?, and yet you comment? Which are the spelling problems?

  • That's right, bright boy, I commented that you are incoherent.

    brude? brood

    Capitolism? capitalism

    Your? you're

  • I don't know what you're saying. It would seem that if he's a libertarian he would embrace capitalism. What about my response to your hectic post would imply that I wasn't a libertarian? LOL I'm a strict literalist. Maybe so.  I dig it though.

  • "One dollar = one vote, Thats why you dont matter"

    "One dollar = one vote" sounds like a view of supply/demand, the core of capitalism. Following that with "That's why you don't matter" sounds like you are saying I don't matter because of capitalism. Is this what you meant?

  • Yeah! At the heart of it. Capitalism and the I.M.F. have brought down everyone just like "Hedge Funds" and private equity. Dudes like Henry Kravis have raped us six ways from Sunday?!?!!! Meanwhile we have others writing books about how bad it is to take more money? Hard to write a book when your actually living this pillage!!

  • The I.M.F. was started with and is supported by money collected by governments - not capitalism. There are actually several schools of economics. The one behind the ideas in this video (or what I remember of it from a month or so ago) come from the austrian school of economics and I think you would find a lot of agreement with the austrian view of existing free trade agreements, the WTO, the IMF, the World Bank etc.

    By Hedge Funds and private equity do you mean the housing crisis in the US?

  • What money? The States is in debt to China at like 2 Trillion, and you cant pay it back. Now that the 9 irons are callin in that debt you all wanna play possum and form new Government in Dubais eh?? Ha Ha!! What I mean is the fire sale going on in the United States. Sadam was selling his oil in "Euros" dude, Thats why they killed him. Iran has set up a new oil trade commission outside the North American stock exchange. Thats why fuel is so expensive. There's a new economy

  • You're fucking I.M.F. has lent so much money to those proposed weaker Countries like Canada idiot. NAFTA was set and initiated by Brian Mulroney. The majority of America's oil comes from Alberta, and it seems your all too busy in Iraq trying to lock down diminutive oil resources out east. That's cause Britain needs it. And you're operating under British directive. Europe will be taken care of, and Canada will control the valve in North America, Hence the N.A.U.

  • So what are you saying needs to happen? The US government needs to become more powerful to preserve it's sovereignty, but the types of people behind these kinds of videos what to take down it's power which you think means the people will be herded into following a new NAU government?

    How about you focus on getting oil companies in Alberta to become independent of the Canadian government so it can't be used to use prices to push a NAU? Depower the Canadian govn't so none can push it.

  • I would say that civil disobedience and self governance is what needs to happen, but thats just utopian idealism. I'm commenting on what is actually happening. The CDN and U.S.dollar at parity and lax immigration laws are a move to introduce the "Amero" and N.A.U. The Amping up of artificial and supposed global concerns like that of "Global warming" to ease patriotism for a congealing of North America, mirroring that of the E.U.,and maintain a fiat system of democracy and finance.

  • Is English your first language?

  • I suppose you'd have to ask.

  • You said you are from Canada, so your first language could be French. Since you use very round about ways of speaking you might be translating a readable French statement very literally when there is an equivalent English expression the meaning of which comes more from tradition than literal definition of each word.

  • Yes that was what I was thinking, "IP".

  • First language of Canada is English, but I appreciate your estute observation. Thats like me saying the first language of the U.S. is Mexican!?

  • Your most idiotic & revealing comment yet. He said YOUR first language.

  • You are very weak. Is that what you hang on? Some supposed grammatical error? Fuck you. You're a chump. You only wish you could be like me. Poor Ham wants to be smart and cant manage it. Funniest thing to me is that you keep trying through meaningless and pointless effort. Idiocy is your only excuse.

  • French is the first language of something like 80% of the people in Quebec.

  • Quebec doesn't represent anyone in Canada. "Je me Souviens" is an assault to all Canadians and all that are the real majority man!! Outside of that, the majority of Canadians speak English (Actually real English) We have now 13 provinces including "Nunavut now" that are English. The only province that is French is quebec, and accordind to you, only 80% speak French. I would say less than that. They couldn't do business in French. Basically a dead language, but we got some hangers on?

  • Not French, eh?

    Massive head trauma?

    There's no need to go off on a ridiculous diatribe about my use of "eh", I'm leaving.

    Goodbye, I hope you get the help you need.

  • Obtrusive moron. You lack the cerberal fortitude . You never spoke of the posted vid. What is your meaning?

  • I got a language for ya. "Newspeak"

  • Well yeah the savings rate is too low. They need to raise interest rates.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more