Viper....wow what to say ...I'll just go with ..pppffffttt.....this is a an honest credible man ....deal with it ....who do you trust as far this topic ...Rush ..Sean ..BillO ....or InHoffe.
Anything that is backed heavily by a politician has to be BULLSHIT. Scientists have been researching climate change for 50+ years and when GORE makes it famous IT ALL OF A SUDDEN IS A BIG DEAL? Fuck you, morons!
Gore is the bigest bullshit alarmist on the planet which is quite well known, .. This fellow is full of shit if he says that Gore is a credable person... I wouldnt trust one word that rolls off the end of his tonque.. mmmm wonder where he gets his grant's and funding from.. ?
@ViperWK while I agree with this is likely an issue of industry and promotion of technocracy. After saying why a few times you realize that their is no real financial benefit to raising awareness about this.
I don't see the connection between lets say, the military industrial complex and climate change - whats your angle?
What is the alternative? that people should have no awareness and their surroundings because they have no consequence...have you been in the slums of any city lately lol?
@scout6686 -- I dont really follow what you just said but thanks for the reply. My comment was about this fellow's credabilty . Gore is a known liar which is quite well documented. If this guy endorses Gore he must have some sort of motive. A large part of sceince rely's on goverment funding..This funding is controlled by the political strucure. If your a sceintist and you favour climate change you have a far greater chance of getting a grant..This starts turning sceince into an industry..
@ViperWK You don't work in science, you know nothing about science, and you have the grammar and spelling of a second grade student. Do everyone a favor - but none more than yourself - and pipe down while the adults are talking.
@dpowens Who the F are are you ? .. You don't even know me.. ? Al Gore is a known liar and alarmist.. He's been caught making 35 falsehoods in his presentations.. The UK government has even pulled is video from being played at their schools.. You don't know science and you sure don't know what professional creditability means. Gore is a known dodgy f*cker.. These "scientists" support him..Cant you see what's gong on..? A true scientist would stay right away from someone like Gore.
Please see the Climate Scientists' Register that the International Climate Science Coalition have created & has been endorsed by 137 climate experts since June 2010:
tinyurl[dot]com/2es3rqx
The Register states:
“We, the undersigned, having assessed the relevant scientific evidence, do not find convincing support for the hypothesis that human emissions of carbon dioxide are causing, or will in the foreseeable future cause, dangerous global warming."
Once again, Bollocks. Stop regurgitating and do some research. When the Cambrian Explosion took place Co2 levels were 20 times what they are now. The world cycles between glacial and inter glacial. Co2 is a minor green house gas measured in parts per million. Even Jones admits there has been no statistical warming in the last ten years. Examining only 150 years of climate is like looking at one grain of sand. Take Reality.
Thank God the leaked emails exposed this scam. Co2 is a life giver - it is carbon dioxide- not monoxide! Co2 always follows from warming- not the other way round.Co2 is contained within the oceans- oceans warm due to the big orange thing in the sky! Look at the records for pre industrial temperatures. The middle age warm period, the little ice age.Do your own research!
These guys are all tied to money! Pichaury is tied to TATA . This video is BS! AGW is about tax and world government!
Bollocks. The time limit for disciplinary action had passed. They were investigated by the same University of East anglia. Thats like asking the foxes to uncover who killed the chickens. Whitewash. Climate change is now the new catch all for anything they want to attach to it. The climate always changes. Co2 is not a pollutant. Carbon monoxide is. Carbon dioxide is a life giver. Fact.
CO2 becomes a pollutant when it accumulates to high levels. There is a threshold in which too much CO2 will weaken the ozone (O3) allowing more ultraviolet radiation to pound the earth. It is true that most CO2 emissions come from natural events such as volcanic eruptions; however, billions of humans with their cars, industrial plants, and destroying the forests are accelerating the process of climate change by adding more CO2 to the atmosphere. Take chemistry.
@justinjoyit13 you are a 15 year old pretending to know more than 99% of climate scientists in the world and you are embarrassing yourself right off the bat by saying that people say Co2 is a pollutant. It is a GREENHOUSE GAS, I hope you know what a greenhouse is right? Even middle-schoolers know that. Anyway, if you're such a genius on climate change, go write a paper and submit for peer-review (part of the scientific method, learn it), then see the response. Debate the scientists, not youtube.
@trtnec You are a moron. The EPA has ruled that Co2 is a pollutant.99% of scientists? Where'd you get that figure? Do you mean from the IPCC report that has been revealed to include non scientists? Furthermore I think you can't even read, I said it is a 'minor greenhouse gas', measured in parts per million. Refute the Co2 level during the Cambrian Explosion. Can't can you. Who should be embarrased? Genius? Surprised you can spell it. Debate yourself because you're definitely a 'Bater'.
@justinjoyit13 lol you're the one debating a "moron" on youtube instead of the actual scientists who think YOU are the moron. At least I can admit that I don't know much unlike you who thinks you're a genius, I just know climate change is considered fact. I'll say it again, get off your pathetic ass and debate the, like I said 99% of scientists who consider it fact, NOT YOUTUBE. You're right I can't "refute Co2 level during Cambrian Explosion" cause I don't know enough but the SCIENTISTS can.
@justinjoyit13 Go ahead, I'm waiting for your landmark scientific paper that proves just about every scientist in the world wrong, after all, if Einstein published one that proved everyone wrong and he wasn't even technically a scientist at the time, anyone can. EVERY scientist wants to prove the status quo wrong and they can't, but you claim to be able to. Now stop claiming to be a genius and go prove everyone wrong, otherwise you're just a nutjob moron claiming to be smart debating YOUTUBERs
The ice is making a comeback! How does this look now? All these guys should be happy, because we now have no problem with global warming. But now they need to go get their funding doing something else!
Since the Goog2k is obsessed with Methane & her gang of Red Cabbage friends & sock accounts, pretend they want to stop the AGW ( AKA ponzi scheme) they should become exterminators. They could target termites as they are a main source of Methane gas. They could also stop using half & half & milk in their Starbuck's latte's & switch to Soy as Cows also produce Methane.
The Rice patty part of the equation may be harder, as China couldn't care less about polluting, human rights, or animal abuse
Methane Releases from Arctic Shelf May Be Much Larger and Faster Than Anticipated
NSF - March 4, 2010.
Research results, published in the March 5 edition of the journal Science, show that the permafrost under the East Siberian Arctic Shelf, long thought to be an impermeable barrier sealing in methane, is perforated and is starting to leak large amounts of methane into the atmosphere. Release of even a fraction of the methane stored in the shelf could trigger abrupt climate warming.
If you really need to be convinced that high levels of CO2 can be poisonous just route the exhaust from your car into the passenger cabin and roll up all the windows.
@SleepinCougar This is way wrong! It is the Carbon Monoxide that will kill you, not CO2. Sailors spend days in submarines with no harm in concentrations of 8,000 ppm CO2 which is over 20 times the amount in the atmosphere.
This video is the biggest bullshit kife i've ever heard! Co2 is not a poison gas!!! What the fuck?? All amimals emit it....and 1 volcano eruption emits an astronomically huge amount! Hmmm what uses co2 on the planet??? All plants maybe? There is no proof at all that supposed climate change is caused by humans! Ice ages come and go...and this is a NATURAL trend! Humans cannot control the planet! Dipshits!
Dr. Oppenheimer: B.S. in chemistry from MIT, Ph.D. in chemical physics from University of Chicago. Professor of geoscience at Princeton University. Over 100 published papers.
Ok here is the deal since 1850 the majority of the scientific community has agreeded that co2 is a greenhouse gass that directly effects the climate and weather on earth..... and it is a fact that man does emit mass quanitys of co2 and other greenhouse gases..... so u can eather belive what the majority of scientist for the last 160 years or u can agree with the 2% who dnt agree with the other 98% the choice is yours
"Yes indeed 31,000 'scientist', not 31,000 climate researchers. Fun fact, to sign the petition, you only require a BD. I have a BD degree in sociology, so technically this would mean that I'm permitted to sign the petition. But what the hell do I know about climate change?"
There is ZERO evidence for your BD claim. There are 3,697 specifically Atmospheric, Environmental, and Earth scientist petitioners of the Global Warming Petition Project.
Well, there have been those that have said this wasnt good science or a lot was not published delibritly. It makes a lot of people wonder if the Earth wouldnt have its own natural cycles. I agree reguardless of global warming, we dont need a larger hole than we already have in the ozone. I think thats a good reason the cancer rate has gone up. Among all the pesticides and other contaminates. I think we need an independant group of scientists other than these guys to do research.
You aren't going to find an independent group of scientists. The "A" team has been the first to go to work.
For example: when the Ozone Hole was first discovered, the scientists thought it must be an instrument error. It took some work to determine the instruments were playing the correct notes. The hole came first, then the reason and cause were discovered.
The best and brightest are finding things you don't want to know about.
But I read that the evidence was either not all given or they doctored the figures. They may be correct, but people are second guess them after hearing about things like that. Who isnt being honest?? Someone.
But, but, but! But what? What did you hear? That one proxy dataset suddenly diverged from the instrument record? The other proxies are not as easy to obtain as tree ring data. Maybe, it may be as important to find out why tree growth suddenly diverged from the instrument record.
That could be as exciting as discovering that W. Antarctica is mostly below sea level with up to a mile or more of ice sitting on it above sea level. One place is 8,233 ft below msl solid ice to the bottom.
you tell us about the acuracy of the data. how come mr Oppenheimer that lots of data is kept secret? does that look to you like sience, or propaganda?
im an environmentalist, and i believe that humans should be more responsible regarding the impact on nature, but in no way im ready to 'admit' that the man made global warming debate is over.
Gore's co2 levels and temp rise graph its the other way around, as we all know, so lets not go back in the dark ages by involving politicts in science ;]
by the way there are tens of thousands who disagree, including some of the authors from the IPCC.
'co2 has never led climate change' one claimed. al gore will do well out of it since he has a carbon trading company. John Coleman calls this the biggest scam in history.
He says, "there are hundreds, if not thousands who are associated with the [panel]. Well, there are 31,478 scientists, 9029 with PhDs, who have signed a petition saying it's not real.
Yes but 1 lunar day is 27 earth days. So there is lots of time for the surface to warm up. Also bear in mind that the lunar *night* temperature is -150C. So bite me.
The good lord gave you a brain, so use it. What is the average of +107 and -150? -43C. Yet the moon is the same distance from the sun as the earth. The reason the average temperature of the earth is higher is because our atmosphere traps heat due to the greenhouse effect. Which is a good thing, because otherwise we'd freeze, but you can have too much of a good thing. At certain points in (I think) the Triassic there was such and overcharged greenhouse effect that the poles were tropical.
Your being very ignorant, the moon has no atmosphere... The Earth's atmosphere helps keep the planet's temp at a range in which life can live. The moon has no atmosphere to do this and thus no protection from extremely hot solar rays nor from the extreme cold of space. Living things can change the climate of Earth as well as the atmosphere's composition. We know because bacteria, 3 billion years ago is what allowed our atmosphere to have oxygen.
If you know any science at all. It is scientifically known that Carbon Dioxide in our atmosphere is what allows it to have a warm enough temp for life. There was a period of time in Earth's history called the Carbiniferous, in which there was so much carbon dioxide that rainforests covered the planet... It was extremely warm.
Only a complete idiot would believe CO2 is the cause of climate change. If you took all the CO2 out of the atmosphere the earth would still be warm, but if you increased the CO2 by 1000 times and took the Sun away we would be ice. The IPCC doesn't even factor in the cycles of the Sun!! That's a pretty big clue as to why the IPCC are wrong...it's a no brainer!!! There's a reason why the Sun is the most worshipped object in history...even the cave men understood why it was warmer in the daytime.
>>Please cite the scientific paper that supports that statement!>>
Do a search for:
PALE: Classic Articles/Global Warming
Dr. James Fleming assembled a data base of seminal articles on climate science from most of the important people in the field. Which article is the best place to start is a difficult question. You could start with Jean-Baptiste Fouier's 1824 paper, or perhaps the famous Chaney report of 1979? John Tydall's essay is wonderfull but is not an easy read.
Non of the papers you have cited suggest that CO2 is the reason the Earth is warm enough for life. Please show me the actual paragraph that states this. You wont find it as NO scientist would be stupid enough to make that statement. How can you not know that the main reason the Earths temp is so good for life, is because of it's distance from the SUN? Don't you understand the reason we have summer/winter? 2nd is water vapour! Mars has a methane atmosphere and can reach 30c in the summer. No CO2
But, it's nice to see care in the community at work. In that context, let's start with the paper you suggest. Fouier's (Fourier's) 1824. What is no.1 on his list? THE SUN'S radiation heats the particles in the Atmosphere! What does the amosphere consist of? 78%Nitrogen, 21%Oxygen and all the other gases share the last 1%. CO2 is less than 1/25th of 1% and man's effect is 1/3rd of that. It's like pissing in an Olympic swimming pool and expecting the water to turn Yellow! Idiots!!!
NAS and AAAS are THE MOST RESPECTED SCIENTIFIC ORGANIZATIONS ON EARTH!!!!!!!
They say global climate change is real, it is a problem and it is our fault. They also say action needs to be taken immediately. These guys aren't advocates of any kind, these are the nerdiest guys on earth. Why would I listen to anyone else? The newest IPCC report states that we are %90!!! likely to be the cause of global climate destabalisation.
oh...dam once you said all gore I new you were full of shit % 80 I hope your not Keiths brother because he,s a big ,,,,,,,,, it,s feburary in michigan just look up how much snow we have It might be snowing there but thay won`t say,,scientiest why not have one ON the show.. that dose not agree with this guy there all over the PLACE
You are taking issue with evidence that is way past your understanding. Temperate deciduous biomes will not show "warming" as much as it WILL show more extreme weather changes during the seasons, ie more snow storms/snow fall. Why are insurance companies worried? The premium loss ratio is changing such that their bottom line is threatened. Don't tell people this isn't happening!
,2 boomback /// the alarm sounding in the 60,s I read a book thay are still talking about the same thing Big money maker,s Sea level raising,,look at a lake that you know water high?? Because people are building water has no where to go ,,Now every state doing this,,well I think he,s 60 % right can`t hurt ,,I just think when the other guy say,s Al Gore he,s cooked
Yes, indeed, John, nuclear and even clean coal plants would help us take advantage of our resources. This global warming religious movement will die out eventually when people start to wake up. Remember where you heard it...
The idea that all those concerned about Anthropogenic Global Warming are against nuclear power is false. I am concerned, and I am happy to benefit from nuclear power. I am also in favor of other safe carbon neutral power sources which may be cheaper per kilowatt hour. I am in favor of acting in a reasonable manner. Which is first and foremost about quickly replacing fossil fuel use with safe substainable technologies.
My blgo tells you how to do nuclear fusino from water: Clean power with no CO2 or toxic death! So no global warming, though that was onyl ever phantom ficiton!
It is a pity we now know how to do nuclear fusion, so this video is rubbish! Out of date, and fictional. Third rate iction though! But nothing to let nuclear power build new plants of death over!
useless things like " a peace prize" r the same things that contribute hugely to global warming since wen does peace deserve a prize i thot it was just doing the rite thing not for a reward. i kant imagine how huge an impact sumthing as simple as trophys for kids sports leagues has on the earth,if sum1 told me wen i was a kid sum useles shiny piece of plastic participation award helpd hurt the environment i woulda said no , y wasnt i told
The IPCC used to be the 'Independant ...' until I pointed out it was biased! GW does not exist, but they want research grants to look into phantom science!
incomparable…
VideoGameCoupons 1 week ago
elvis durhan anyone
avengedTheShadows 3 months ago
Viper....wow what to say ...I'll just go with ..pppffffttt.....this is a an honest credible man ....deal with it ....who do you trust as far this topic ...Rush ..Sean ..BillO ....or InHoffe.
copycoonie 4 months ago
Anything that is backed heavily by a politician has to be BULLSHIT. Scientists have been researching climate change for 50+ years and when GORE makes it famous IT ALL OF A SUDDEN IS A BIG DEAL? Fuck you, morons!
1truemisfit 5 months ago 2
is this guy related to j. robert oppenheimer?
krazyrazorrock 5 months ago
Gore is the bigest bullshit alarmist on the planet which is quite well known, .. This fellow is full of shit if he says that Gore is a credable person... I wouldnt trust one word that rolls off the end of his tonque.. mmmm wonder where he gets his grant's and funding from.. ?
ViperWK 1 year ago
@ViperWK while I agree with this is likely an issue of industry and promotion of technocracy. After saying why a few times you realize that their is no real financial benefit to raising awareness about this.
I don't see the connection between lets say, the military industrial complex and climate change - whats your angle?
What is the alternative? that people should have no awareness and their surroundings because they have no consequence...have you been in the slums of any city lately lol?
scout6686 1 year ago
@scout6686 -- I dont really follow what you just said but thanks for the reply. My comment was about this fellow's credabilty . Gore is a known liar which is quite well documented. If this guy endorses Gore he must have some sort of motive. A large part of sceince rely's on goverment funding..This funding is controlled by the political strucure. If your a sceintist and you favour climate change you have a far greater chance of getting a grant..This starts turning sceince into an industry..
ViperWK 1 year ago
@ViperWK You don't work in science, you know nothing about science, and you have the grammar and spelling of a second grade student. Do everyone a favor - but none more than yourself - and pipe down while the adults are talking.
dpowens 1 month ago
@dpowens Who the F are are you ? .. You don't even know me.. ? Al Gore is a known liar and alarmist.. He's been caught making 35 falsehoods in his presentations.. The UK government has even pulled is video from being played at their schools.. You don't know science and you sure don't know what professional creditability means. Gore is a known dodgy f*cker.. These "scientists" support him..Cant you see what's gong on..? A true scientist would stay right away from someone like Gore.
ViperWK 1 month ago
@ViperWK Really should've taken my advice. Wow.
dpowens 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Please see the Climate Scientists' Register that the International Climate Science Coalition have created & has been endorsed by 137 climate experts since June 2010:
tinyurl[dot]com/2es3rqx
The Register states:
“We, the undersigned, having assessed the relevant scientific evidence, do not find convincing support for the hypothesis that human emissions of carbon dioxide are causing, or will in the foreseeable future cause, dangerous global warming."
Tom Harris
ICSC
TomHarrisICSC 1 year ago
Once again, Bollocks. Stop regurgitating and do some research. When the Cambrian Explosion took place Co2 levels were 20 times what they are now. The world cycles between glacial and inter glacial. Co2 is a minor green house gas measured in parts per million. Even Jones admits there has been no statistical warming in the last ten years. Examining only 150 years of climate is like looking at one grain of sand. Take Reality.
justinjoyit13 1 year ago
Thank God the leaked emails exposed this scam. Co2 is a life giver - it is carbon dioxide- not monoxide! Co2 always follows from warming- not the other way round.Co2 is contained within the oceans- oceans warm due to the big orange thing in the sky! Look at the records for pre industrial temperatures. The middle age warm period, the little ice age.Do your own research!
These guys are all tied to money! Pichaury is tied to TATA . This video is BS! AGW is about tax and world government!
justinjoyit13 1 year ago
@justinjoyit13
The scientists who emails were exposed were cleared by the way. Global Climate change is happening, and we humans are accelerating the process.
kahn2266 1 year ago
@kahn2266
Bollocks. The time limit for disciplinary action had passed. They were investigated by the same University of East anglia. Thats like asking the foxes to uncover who killed the chickens. Whitewash. Climate change is now the new catch all for anything they want to attach to it. The climate always changes. Co2 is not a pollutant. Carbon monoxide is. Carbon dioxide is a life giver. Fact.
justinjoyit13 1 year ago
@justinjoyit13
CO2 becomes a pollutant when it accumulates to high levels. There is a threshold in which too much CO2 will weaken the ozone (O3) allowing more ultraviolet radiation to pound the earth. It is true that most CO2 emissions come from natural events such as volcanic eruptions; however, billions of humans with their cars, industrial plants, and destroying the forests are accelerating the process of climate change by adding more CO2 to the atmosphere. Take chemistry.
kahn2266 1 year ago
@justinjoyit13 you are a 15 year old pretending to know more than 99% of climate scientists in the world and you are embarrassing yourself right off the bat by saying that people say Co2 is a pollutant. It is a GREENHOUSE GAS, I hope you know what a greenhouse is right? Even middle-schoolers know that. Anyway, if you're such a genius on climate change, go write a paper and submit for peer-review (part of the scientific method, learn it), then see the response. Debate the scientists, not youtube.
trtnec 1 year ago
@trtnec You are a moron. The EPA has ruled that Co2 is a pollutant.99% of scientists? Where'd you get that figure? Do you mean from the IPCC report that has been revealed to include non scientists? Furthermore I think you can't even read, I said it is a 'minor greenhouse gas', measured in parts per million. Refute the Co2 level during the Cambrian Explosion. Can't can you. Who should be embarrased? Genius? Surprised you can spell it. Debate yourself because you're definitely a 'Bater'.
justinjoyit13 1 year ago
@justinjoyit13 lol you're the one debating a "moron" on youtube instead of the actual scientists who think YOU are the moron. At least I can admit that I don't know much unlike you who thinks you're a genius, I just know climate change is considered fact. I'll say it again, get off your pathetic ass and debate the, like I said 99% of scientists who consider it fact, NOT YOUTUBE. You're right I can't "refute Co2 level during Cambrian Explosion" cause I don't know enough but the SCIENTISTS can.
trtnec 1 year ago
@justinjoyit13 Go ahead, I'm waiting for your landmark scientific paper that proves just about every scientist in the world wrong, after all, if Einstein published one that proved everyone wrong and he wasn't even technically a scientist at the time, anyone can. EVERY scientist wants to prove the status quo wrong and they can't, but you claim to be able to. Now stop claiming to be a genius and go prove everyone wrong, otherwise you're just a nutjob moron claiming to be smart debating YOUTUBERs
trtnec 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@trtnec Hahaaaaahaaa! You can't even answer a simple question haaaaaaahaaa!
justinjoyit13 1 year ago
The ice is making a comeback! How does this look now? All these guys should be happy, because we now have no problem with global warming. But now they need to go get their funding doing something else!
whistler2255 1 year ago
Since the Goog2k is obsessed with Methane & her gang of Red Cabbage friends & sock accounts, pretend they want to stop the AGW ( AKA ponzi scheme) they should become exterminators. They could target termites as they are a main source of Methane gas. They could also stop using half & half & milk in their Starbuck's latte's & switch to Soy as Cows also produce Methane.
The Rice patty part of the equation may be harder, as China couldn't care less about polluting, human rights, or animal abuse
Thisawareness 1 year ago
NEWS:
Methane Releases from Arctic Shelf May Be Much Larger and Faster Than Anticipated
NSF - March 4, 2010.
Research results, published in the March 5 edition of the journal Science, show that the permafrost under the East Siberian Arctic Shelf, long thought to be an impermeable barrier sealing in methane, is perforated and is starting to leak large amounts of methane into the atmosphere. Release of even a fraction of the methane stored in the shelf could trigger abrupt climate warming.
goog2k 1 year ago
If you really need to be convinced that high levels of CO2 can be poisonous just route the exhaust from your car into the passenger cabin and roll up all the windows.
SleepinCougar 1 year ago
@SleepinCougar This is way wrong! It is the Carbon Monoxide that will kill you, not CO2. Sailors spend days in submarines with no harm in concentrations of 8,000 ppm CO2 which is over 20 times the amount in the atmosphere.
whistler2255 1 year ago
@SleepinCougar Looks like you've been breathing it in if you don't know the difference between Co2 and CO.
justinjoyit13 1 year ago
The IPCC as a rolemodel for other scientific fields? He must be joking.
gertomaniac 1 year ago
This video is the biggest bullshit kife i've ever heard! Co2 is not a poison gas!!! What the fuck?? All amimals emit it....and 1 volcano eruption emits an astronomically huge amount! Hmmm what uses co2 on the planet??? All plants maybe? There is no proof at all that supposed climate change is caused by humans! Ice ages come and go...and this is a NATURAL trend! Humans cannot control the planet! Dipshits!
chevymaxman 2 years ago
Dr. Oppenheimer: B.S. in chemistry from MIT, Ph.D. in chemical physics from University of Chicago. Professor of geoscience at Princeton University. Over 100 published papers.
chevymaxman: douchebag youtube poster.
Glasya666 1 year ago
@chevymaxman agreed bullshit!!!
pleasmarryme 1 year ago
Ok here is the deal since 1850 the majority of the scientific community has agreeded that co2 is a greenhouse gass that directly effects the climate and weather on earth..... and it is a fact that man does emit mass quanitys of co2 and other greenhouse gases..... so u can eather belive what the majority of scientist for the last 160 years or u can agree with the 2% who dnt agree with the other 98% the choice is yours
BibleBeltBandit 2 years ago
Thankyou for that good info. I hear conspiracy nuts on the radio. Take Care
MrJohnnyrace 2 years ago
That 98% of scientists that all have agreed for 160 years, are they also the ones that said we were headed towards an Ice Age in the 70s?
LordVigeous666999 2 years ago
true, but you miss the point: what about feedback-effects, climate sensivity and natural variability?
gertomaniac 1 year ago
I love science. I have all my life. I just want real facts and good sound science.
MrJohnnyrace 2 years ago
Here is what you just erased, wimp:
"Yes indeed 31,000 'scientist', not 31,000 climate researchers. Fun fact, to sign the petition, you only require a BD. I have a BD degree in sociology, so technically this would mean that I'm permitted to sign the petition. But what the hell do I know about climate change?"
randyguitarman13 2 years ago
There is ZERO evidence for your BD claim. There are 3,697 specifically Atmospheric, Environmental, and Earth scientist petitioners of the Global Warming Petition Project.
randyguitarman13 2 years ago
Scientific fraud.
MillionthUsername 2 years ago
We dont believe you Doctor.
MrJohnnyrace 2 years ago
@MrJohnnyrace Have you even looked at Oppenheimer's cv? Probably not. He's been doing research for a long time.
In the future, you should speak for yourself, not a mystery crowd.
TRUMPHENT 2 years ago
Well, there have been those that have said this wasnt good science or a lot was not published delibritly. It makes a lot of people wonder if the Earth wouldnt have its own natural cycles. I agree reguardless of global warming, we dont need a larger hole than we already have in the ozone. I think thats a good reason the cancer rate has gone up. Among all the pesticides and other contaminates. I think we need an independant group of scientists other than these guys to do research.
MrJohnnyrace 2 years ago
You aren't going to find an independent group of scientists. The "A" team has been the first to go to work.
For example: when the Ozone Hole was first discovered, the scientists thought it must be an instrument error. It took some work to determine the instruments were playing the correct notes. The hole came first, then the reason and cause were discovered.
The best and brightest are finding things you don't want to know about.
TRUMPHENT 2 years ago
But I read that the evidence was either not all given or they doctored the figures. They may be correct, but people are second guess them after hearing about things like that. Who isnt being honest?? Someone.
MrJohnnyrace 2 years ago
But, but, but! But what? What did you hear? That one proxy dataset suddenly diverged from the instrument record? The other proxies are not as easy to obtain as tree ring data. Maybe, it may be as important to find out why tree growth suddenly diverged from the instrument record.
That could be as exciting as discovering that W. Antarctica is mostly below sea level with up to a mile or more of ice sitting on it above sea level. One place is 8,233 ft below msl solid ice to the bottom.
TRUMPHENT 2 years ago
98% of the scientific comunity agree with them..... 2% of scientist dnt think global climate change isnt man made....
BibleBeltBandit 2 years ago
the earth is our god; money is our jesus.
whitmanjaywhitman 2 years ago
You LIE Dr. Oppenheimer!!
pat52007 2 years ago
you tell us about the acuracy of the data. how come mr Oppenheimer that lots of data is kept secret? does that look to you like sience, or propaganda?
im an environmentalist, and i believe that humans should be more responsible regarding the impact on nature, but in no way im ready to 'admit' that the man made global warming debate is over.
Gore's co2 levels and temp rise graph its the other way around, as we all know, so lets not go back in the dark ages by involving politicts in science ;]
durox 2 years ago
Smart.
Cleareye10 2 years ago
by the way there are tens of thousands who disagree, including some of the authors from the IPCC.
'co2 has never led climate change' one claimed. al gore will do well out of it since he has a carbon trading company. John Coleman calls this the biggest scam in history.
wearechangenorwich 2 years ago
He says, "there are hundreds, if not thousands who are associated with the [panel]. Well, there are 31,478 scientists, 9029 with PhDs, who have signed a petition saying it's not real.
jenndouglas1 2 years ago
US must send Al Gore to the moon so that Al Gore will see that global warming in the moon is NOT CAUSED BY HUMANS nor CO2.
The moon's average day temp is 107C.
The earth's average day temp is 14C..
So, are humans causing global warming in the moon?
There are no factories and cars in the moon.
So, what is causing the global warming in the moon?
Answer: Sunlight!
Al Gore and Rajendra Pachauri are such frauds!
andrewanguslive 2 years ago
Yes but 1 lunar day is 27 earth days. So there is lots of time for the surface to warm up. Also bear in mind that the lunar *night* temperature is -150C. So bite me.
kashphlinktu 2 years ago 2
The earth has an average day temp and an average night temp.
The moon has an average day temp and an average night temp.
There are no cars, factories, humans in the moon.
The hot climate of the moon is strong evidence that humans and CO2 are not causing global warming crisis on earth.
andrewanguslive 2 years ago
The good lord gave you a brain, so use it. What is the average of +107 and -150? -43C. Yet the moon is the same distance from the sun as the earth. The reason the average temperature of the earth is higher is because our atmosphere traps heat due to the greenhouse effect. Which is a good thing, because otherwise we'd freeze, but you can have too much of a good thing. At certain points in (I think) the Triassic there was such and overcharged greenhouse effect that the poles were tropical.
kashphlinktu 2 years ago 2
Your being very ignorant, the moon has no atmosphere... The Earth's atmosphere helps keep the planet's temp at a range in which life can live. The moon has no atmosphere to do this and thus no protection from extremely hot solar rays nor from the extreme cold of space. Living things can change the climate of Earth as well as the atmosphere's composition. We know because bacteria, 3 billion years ago is what allowed our atmosphere to have oxygen.
stev1238 2 years ago
If you know any science at all. It is scientifically known that Carbon Dioxide in our atmosphere is what allows it to have a warm enough temp for life. There was a period of time in Earth's history called the Carbiniferous, in which there was so much carbon dioxide that rainforests covered the planet... It was extremely warm.
stev1238 2 years ago
"It is scientifically known that Carbon Dioxide in our atmosphere is what allows it to have a warm enough temp for life."
Please cite the scientific paper that supports that statement!
rampant2 2 years ago
Only a complete idiot would believe CO2 is the cause of climate change. If you took all the CO2 out of the atmosphere the earth would still be warm, but if you increased the CO2 by 1000 times and took the Sun away we would be ice. The IPCC doesn't even factor in the cycles of the Sun!! That's a pretty big clue as to why the IPCC are wrong...it's a no brainer!!! There's a reason why the Sun is the most worshipped object in history...even the cave men understood why it was warmer in the daytime.
rampant2 2 years ago
>>Only a complete idiot would believe carbon dioxide is the cause of climate change.>>
Idiots like John Christy & Roy Spencer?
If even those scientists who are (emphatically) sceptics hold this opinion maybe you need to give this subject a bit more thought.
bluetwinky 2 years ago
You're a Goddamn idiot.
ExaltedLeader 2 years ago
Great argument but go back to doing your colouring in. And remember, crayons are not to be chewed.
rampant2 2 years ago
>>Please cite the scientific paper that supports that statement!>>
Do a search for:
PALE: Classic Articles/Global Warming
Dr. James Fleming assembled a data base of seminal articles on climate science from most of the important people in the field. Which article is the best place to start is a difficult question. You could start with Jean-Baptiste Fouier's 1824 paper, or perhaps the famous Chaney report of 1979? John Tydall's essay is wonderfull but is not an easy read.
Cheers!
bluetwinky 2 years ago
Non of the papers you have cited suggest that CO2 is the reason the Earth is warm enough for life. Please show me the actual paragraph that states this. You wont find it as NO scientist would be stupid enough to make that statement. How can you not know that the main reason the Earths temp is so good for life, is because of it's distance from the SUN? Don't you understand the reason we have summer/winter? 2nd is water vapour! Mars has a methane atmosphere and can reach 30c in the summer. No CO2
rampant2 2 years ago
But, it's nice to see care in the community at work. In that context, let's start with the paper you suggest. Fouier's (Fourier's) 1824. What is no.1 on his list? THE SUN'S radiation heats the particles in the Atmosphere! What does the amosphere consist of? 78%Nitrogen, 21%Oxygen and all the other gases share the last 1%. CO2 is less than 1/25th of 1% and man's effect is 1/3rd of that. It's like pissing in an Olympic swimming pool and expecting the water to turn Yellow! Idiots!!!
rampant2 2 years ago
This was maybe the worst argument ever made on youtube.
EmeraldAxe2 2 years ago
Watch video: Al Gore is Adolph Hitler.... This video is banned in some countries...
Comment, Rate, Subscribe.....
andrewanguslive 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NAS and AAAS are THE MOST RESPECTED SCIENTIFIC ORGANIZATIONS ON EARTH!!!!!!!
They say global climate change is real, it is a problem and it is our fault. They also say action needs to be taken immediately. These guys aren't advocates of any kind, these are the nerdiest guys on earth. Why would I listen to anyone else? The newest IPCC report states that we are %90!!! likely to be the cause of global climate destabalisation.
keenanmartens 2 years ago
By how much has the sea level risen already?
oomblikkies 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The (KAYA) identity is expressed in the form:
F = P * (G / P) * (E / G) * (F / E) = P * g * e * f
where
F is global CO2 emissions from human sources,
P is global population,
G is world GDP and g = (G/P) is global per-capita GDP,
E is global primary energy consumption and e=(E/G) is the energy intensity of world GDP,
and f=(F/E) is the carbon intensity of energy.
Extensive variables are uppercase while intensive variables are lowercase.
thejudicialbranch9 3 years ago
oh...dam once you said all gore I new you were full of shit % 80 I hope your not Keiths brother because he,s a big ,,,,,,,,, it,s feburary in michigan just look up how much snow we have It might be snowing there but thay won`t say,,scientiest why not have one ON the show.. that dose not agree with this guy there all over the PLACE
twochaudio 3 years ago
You are taking issue with evidence that is way past your understanding. Temperate deciduous biomes will not show "warming" as much as it WILL show more extreme weather changes during the seasons, ie more snow storms/snow fall. Why are insurance companies worried? The premium loss ratio is changing such that their bottom line is threatened. Don't tell people this isn't happening!
dwolfcoach 2 years ago
Less than 300 worked on the science for the IPCC! The oregon petition currently lists more than 31,000 scientists critical of "climate change".
randyguitarman13 3 years ago
Thank you Dr. Michael Oppenheimer!
Now that the alarm has sounded those that are reasonable need to work to solve this crisis.
WeCanSolveIt(dot)org
2boomback 3 years ago
,2 boomback /// the alarm sounding in the 60,s I read a book thay are still talking about the same thing Big money maker,s Sea level raising,,look at a lake that you know water high?? Because people are building water has no where to go ,,Now every state doing this,,well I think he,s 60 % right can`t hurt ,,I just think when the other guy say,s Al Gore he,s cooked
twochaudio 2 years ago
Yes, indeed, John, nuclear and even clean coal plants would help us take advantage of our resources. This global warming religious movement will die out eventually when people start to wake up. Remember where you heard it...
dmmadde 3 years ago
There really is no such thing as Clean Coal.
JezeroCraterDweller 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i want 100 new nuc plants in 20 years
johnnecron 3 years ago
Nuclear plants wouldn't emit CO2; I don't understand why people who believe in climate change are against nuclear power.
EmeraldAxe2 2 years ago
The idea that all those concerned about Anthropogenic Global Warming are against nuclear power is false. I am concerned, and I am happy to benefit from nuclear power. I am also in favor of other safe carbon neutral power sources which may be cheaper per kilowatt hour. I am in favor of acting in a reasonable manner. Which is first and foremost about quickly replacing fossil fuel use with safe substainable technologies.
bluetwinky 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This guy is a quack who gives science a bad name. He couldn't even predict the weather two days from now let alone 100 years.
southporkie 3 years ago
Yes!
randyguitarman13 3 years ago
Weather and climate are not the same things.
bapyou 2 years ago
Very important and truthful conversation about climate change with one of the most thoughtful scientific experts on it. JonThm is a denier and a fool
merrellkrakow 3 years ago 4
I agree - JonThm is a denier and a skeptic that no one is listening to. It's a time for facing up to the music and being environmental in new ways
hoperussetta 3 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
'Global WArming' is PR by nuclear power, nto science.
JonThm 3 years ago
John, Mr. Oppenheimer is not an advocate for the use of nuclear power. You are wrong again.
bluetwinky 3 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
stooge for nuclear power! You want us dead don't you?
JonThm 3 years ago
Your comment is a canard. You do know that don't you?
bluetwinky 3 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
The Weatehr is made by God, not man!
JonThm 3 years ago
Wake up! Global warming is real folks. The signs are everywhere and the evidence is too strong to ignore.
stanhenkel 3 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
My blgo tells you how to do nuclear fusino from water: Clean power with no CO2 or toxic death! So no global warming, though that was onyl ever phantom ficiton!
JonThm 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Life is supported by plants taking in CO2: So CO2 tracks teh climate, it does not make the weather! How about doing REAL sciecne?
JonThm 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Global warming is a Democrats' conspiracy! There is no proof for it!
insanevituperation 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
GW is phatom ficiton from nuclear power, trying ot kill us all!
JonThm 3 years ago
What a cool show! Mark Molaro is so good. He does not interrupt his guests and he's so welcoming. Good job!
jumpingdoctordre 3 years ago 3
What a cool show! This Mark Molaro is so good. He does not interrupt his guest and is very laid back! I like that.
jumpingdoctordre 3 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
It is a pity we now know how to do nuclear fusion, so this video is rubbish! Out of date, and fictional. Third rate iction though! But nothing to let nuclear power build new plants of death over!
JonThm 3 years ago
is this show on PBS or CSPAN? if not y not?
stinky884 4 years ago 7
This has been flagged as spam show
useless things like " a peace prize" r the same things that contribute hugely to global warming since wen does peace deserve a prize i thot it was just doing the rite thing not for a reward. i kant imagine how huge an impact sumthing as simple as trophys for kids sports leagues has on the earth,if sum1 told me wen i was a kid sum useles shiny piece of plastic participation award helpd hurt the environment i woulda said no , y wasnt i told
shortysmagic 4 years ago
FINALLY!!! I have been looking everywhere for a direct, non-emotional response to my fears about global warming, and I think I have found it.
malleycat70 4 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
Surf 'JonThm' on youtube, for how to do nuclear fusion: Power with no CO2. Join 'Fusion on Earth' group.
JonThm 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The IPCC used to be the 'Independant ...' until I pointed out it was biased! GW does not exist, but they want research grants to look into phantom science!
JonThm 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Global Warming is not true - it was invented by the nuclear industry.
JonThm 4 years ago
Where did u get this idea from? I am really interested in where these anti-global warming theories come from.
sambomango 4 years ago 2
ignoring it won't make it go away
kareno18 4 years ago 4
The good doctor knows a lot
ziggydorfman 4 years ago 8
Great conversation! Very inspiring
resclive 4 years ago 7