I do not know if this vaccination is safe or not but I know my own experience. I took the first stage of the Gardasil vaccination and after I became sick. I had a cold for 3 months straight! I am almost never ill. It was a semi mellow cold but I did have to stay in bed often because I was just so tired. I began to fear I had Aids, got tested and did not. I decided not to take the nest round of Gardasil because I was concerned about being sick again. Three months is a long time to be sick!
This is why lay people make me sad. HPV has many, many strains. Not all are detrimental to TNF. Types 6, 11, 16, and 18 destroy TNF. With no TNF, cervical cancer may arise.
HPV is carried by both sexes. Virus' don't know gender sadly. Take some of this extra time you have and read actual research.
My daughter had all 3 HPV vaccine shots and had absolutely no ill effects - no loss of intelligence, no damage to bodily organs, no autism, no sudden death, no nothing, only a slight redness at the injection site.
The Hoax is what the Healthranger is trying to tell the public.
Out of 25,274 people, there were 24 deaths total. (no difference between Placebo and experimental groups in # of deaths). The events reported were consistent with unrelated causes of death.
Causes of death:: motor vehicle accident, overdose/suicide, pulmonary thrombosis, sepsis, pancreatic cancer, arrhythmia, asphyxia...
Deaths not caused by vaccine, but due to random events or pre-existing disease.
The conclusion that HPV vaccine causes disease based on the -47% number is incorrect on your part. That is a Confidence Interval, hence a negative number means there is no statistically significant correlation with that parameter.
Yet, you draw the false conclusion that there is a negative effect. In order to know if there was a negative effect, one has to look at the "Adverse Effects".
For HPV there was no difference between Placebo and Gardasil - no negative effect caused by Vaccine
You seem to say HPV clears up on it's own. Wrong. you were not aware that once you are infected - the virus stays latent in the body - ready to cause cancer or warts later in life.
"HPV rates high and not associated with cervical cancer" - simply means that not all HPVs cause cancer only about 15-20 out of about 40. You misunderstood!
Your conclusion that the HPV vaccine trial was "Junk Science" is completely unfounded. In fact, it is one of the most effective vaccines in history!!!
Boys/Men get warts and penile cancer caused by HPV, hence, they should be vaccinated also.
You misunderstood Therapeutic vs Prophylactic vaccines, leading to several false conclusions on your part. The HPV vaccine is prophylactic- look it up.
Regarding "lack of clearance of lesions" Those are pre-existing lesions, ie already infected individuals. The HPV vaccine works for those not previously infected.
This is such a bunch of bull!! It's just poorly done shock journalism. This "Healthranger" is not a scientist, and yet he purports to know everything about vaccines and how they are dangerous to people. His evidence is non-existent, yet he talks on.
This is the modern day equivalent of the Flat-Earth Society. You have to just believe him, because all of the facts go against his claims.
What if the scientific evidence suggests that you are working with ulterior motives? What if you have no idea how to interpret the information you read? What if you are threatening the health of women?
Most is not all and the evidence is quite clear at this point that HPV does lead to cervical cancer. YOu give us this information yourself, because there wouldn't be a threat from the vaccine if it didn't.
Apparently logic, science, epidemiology and reading comprehension arent strong suits.
You suggest he is threating the health of women? I am a woman and let me tell you what threatens the health of women -LYING to us that condoms protect against STDs (I did find it on a government NIH web site that condoms do NOT protect against HPV) and not telling women that the pill thins out the uterine lining making us MUCH more succeptable to STDs, not to mention the pill makes us gain weight and get depressed and irritable, and can cause stroke. THIS threatens the health of women!
translation: chances of developing CV (which cases have been decreasing) are far lesser vs. the chances of becoming ill after getting the vaccine.~ 8mil vaccines have been given out and 28 deaths and 8000 severe side effects(US data) + Spain? You do the math. this vaccine has only been out for 3 years and long term side effects are yet to be observed. It is still in test stage. speaking of "ulterior" motives. its called Merck making $40K/100 girls(usa) vaccinated.whos paying for that?
Read those documents; figure out how it fits together. Go yahoo groups, Lets talk about Gardasil, and kkrasnowwaterman(.)com. Read the posts by these girls and mothers that witnessed the damage and non recovered from outcomes. Go to all the links they provide, like cynthiajanak(.).com. How can you continue discount all this that girls are dying and some suffering to that degree, and continue to claiming no proof. There are several other sites with similar posts. Like it dont matter.
Most of vaccines are based on junk science, do a little reading if only from CDC, they don't hide it. Vaccination doesn't equal immunization. It is helpful to see what kind of damage occurs in the brain when one is vaccinated, it is very interesting read. Why would anyone want to inject a healthy young girl with a std virus from another person?
The biggest fallacy is when the speaker shifts the burden of proof onto the audience to do the research for him. Post some links or you look like a delirious ranter.
thanks... i´ve already read information of the kind, in many information sites, and i totally agree. It´s no paranoia, and what was said in this video was appointed on FDA web-site. If you think that it´s a conspiracy theory... well, your problem. Go and watch Fox news...
You bet wrong. I have nothing to do with Merck. In fact, I a critic of Big Pharma and support the No Free Lunch movement. But criticizing the business practices of a company and dissing a life-saving vaccine are two very different things.
If you convince someone to refuse the vaccine who later dies of a preventable HPV related cancer, then you are responsible for that person's death. Are you willing to take that on? No, I didn't think so. And that's irresponsible.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Wow. This is remarkably irresponsible. As a clinician that treats HPV disease, and is involved in HPV research, I find the type of misinformation Mike Adams is peddling really scary.
Yes, I do remember. My dad had a quadruple bi pass and he was prescribed Vioxx, next thing you know the doctor was taking him off of it... Now, get this... I've always known Vioxx causes heart problems long before it the drug was pulled... What took the doctor so long? If it weren't pulled, it would have killed my dad before his time. So you see? Doctors are not taught prevention, they are taught what to prescribe based on big billion dollar pharma. Wisdom people, it takes wisdom.
Thank You Thank You Thank You!! Please do more, on all the OTHER vaccine insanity going on - the childhood vaccines that our infants are getting, unnecessarily. All those infectious diseases were on their way OUT, long before the vaccine programs, etc etc etc.
i am SOO glad that i didn't give in to our pediatrician. when the vaccine first came out, i knew immediately my oldest, 16, wouldn't be getting one. her ped, however, had different plans & REALLY pressured me until i almost felt like a bad mom about saying no. now i feel like a super-mom! i almost lied & said that my daughter had already had sex just to stop the badgering! i also lied about my younger ones having had chicken pox so they wouldn't have to get those vaccines either!
It's about time!!!! These pharmaceutical companies need to quit profiting by endangering our children! They are not guinea pigs! The were only 8 vaccines we had as children...now there are 36?? All because of the Pharm companies and their deep pockets giving hush money to the CDC to keep the dangers hidden! I just read there have been 1300+ deaths due to this vaccine. Ugh...
i am doing a report on gardasil, and i have been looking into the statistics and death rates caused by it, i found only 8 deaths due to gardasil, i was wondering where you got your information from, i would really like to check whether or not my information is right.
yeah y would they say give ur 12 year old a shot in case she starts fucking! this stupid i knew it was something up when it first came out. i mean, all vaccines are, are like dormant forms of the virus so y would u want to inject a virus live or dead into ur body. i bet muthafuckas wouldnt do it if it was hiv so y would u do it and its cancer? be abstinent or committed. and if u choose commitment tell ur partner if they cheat and give u something u will kill them.and mean it
To follow up on my previous comment. It can be compared to melanoma or lung cancer. We know that smoking increases the risk of lung cancer. Do all smokers get lung cancer? No. Sunburns increase the risk of skin cancer. Does everyone who has a sunburn get melanoma? Aboslutely not. HPV is a cause of cervical cancer. Does everyone infected with HPV get cancer? Absolutely not. That does not mean it isn't the major cause. The E6 and E7 proteins disrupt normal cell cycle and can cause cancer.
Thank you for your honest and professional opinion. If you read my comments under the other "Gardisil HPV Hoax" link, I agree with you completely. This is not about pharmaceutical companies, its about medical advancements. Be greatful that we now have the options to immunize our bodies before we are infected with deadly diseases.. But everyone is entitled to their opinion. I say, educate youself on this before you jump to conclusions. And don't believe every website/youtube video you see.
I will start by saying I have an MD and a PhD in molecular biology. I currently study cancer formation and metastasis and have many publications in the field. I can assure all the readers that HPV infection is absolutely the most common cause of cervical cancer. Most women who are infected with HPV do not get cancer. The problem is that many do. There are many types of HPV, some of which are much more likely to cause cervival cancer. This type of "journalism" is dangerous.
So in your opinion it is better for young girls to suffer now with ill health,or even death, than possibly later in life after they had a chance to raise a family and after they had a chance of a happy , productive life?
Your opinion is sooooo dumb, and you are EDUCATED ????
Big corporations seek big profits and are obligated to do so in order to satisfy and attract more shareholders. They seek to kill people, people are dying or being injured as a result of their drugs/vaccines and it is just collateral damage to them. They are not looking out for our best interest. Just their bottom line.
As a woman let me say that this guy has ABSOLUTELY no idea what he is talking about. This is complete bs. Talk about being harmful to women...get the correct info from a non-partisian source, a women's health center, etc. This misinformation is just dangerous.
"Women who have normal Pap test results and no HPV infection are at very low risk (0.2%) for developing cervical cancer. Women who have an abnormal Pap test and a positive HPV test are at higher risk (6%-7% or greater) of developing cervical cancer if not treated"
"Knowing whether or not a woman is infected with highrisk HPV is added information that will help physicians detect and treat early cell changes that might eventually lead to cervical cancer"
-You're right, almost all medical professionals agree that HPV is a major (if not neccessary) cause of Cervical Cancer. This is where Mike Adams is completely off-base. He just misinterpreted a few reports, that's all. I know he means well, but he should read those reports a little bit closer.
But the press release Mike cited specified that the virus isn't associated with it. Seems pretty clear cut case of someone is lying to me. Mike has nothing to gain from lying, but pharma people do...
No it actually doesn't say this. What is says is that "most (HPV) infections are short-lived and not associated with cervical cancer."
This is true; MOST times one gets HPV it goes away. But on occasion it won't go away and then it is associated with Cancer. An analogy would be "Most teenage drivers are safe and not associated with car crashes". This is true, but doesn't change the fact that MVAs are the #1 killers for teens in America. Does this make sense?
Let's see if the HPV vaccine makes those 4000 deaths drop, huh? What if it doesn't, what if it gets worse even after the vaccines? Time will tell, but I am not having my daughters take it.
Fauztran, you're right Cervical Cancer isn't an epidemic, but about 4000 women die each year from it, and lots more get surgery/chemo for it. And we have pretty good screening methods (ie. Pap tests) to try and catch it early when it's easy to treat. The vaccine is probably more suited for developing nations where it's the number 2 cancer in women (since there aren't great screening programs).
I'm not a believer in vaccines. I haven't read anything convincing that they do work. For now, I can only see them as a source of continuous income.
Regarding the Gardasail vaccine, there are have been a few reported deaths due to it. Many have claimed burning pains at the injection site, and some are passing out.
If you want to prevent cancer, or other ailments, learn about Antoine Bechamp and Claude Bernard's Terrain Theory. Its a better understanding of how the body works.
fauztran: Are you implying that everyone since Pasteur has been wrong about vaccines? Has the entire scientific community never realized this, or did and kept silent in a 130-year-long conspiracy? Haven't any rebel doctors ever come up against it? Or have we all been kept on the dark about them?
They have known since the beginning - if you look up drug company studies you will find vaccines can't provide immunity.
The vaccines always come out after an outbreak occurs and the disease rates have gone down. After vaccination, disease rates rise again, dramatically. This is also well documented.
Doctors only read medical journals, which receive millions of $ from drug companies, who make $1 billion each year off vaccines. I never studied this in school and I used to give vaccines.
OliviaHadassah: Well, that last statement is only partially true. I don't know about the practice of medical ethics in the States, but being both my grandfathers medical doctors, I know there are honest doctors who observe what happens to their patients, and may act differently from what a medical journal suggests if they experience negative results with their own patients.
If this is indeed true, I'd like to understand what has happened for the past 130 years since vaccines were invented.
Doctors don't know the reactions are coming from the vaccines because they are brainwashed to believe they are safe. People drive to emergency rooms claiming their child had a seizure just after being vaccinated, and they're told to continue the vaccination series. Many babies were healthy until 18 months when they received their 3rd shot of mercury, then suddenly they're autistic.
I was seriously ill from a vaccination myself and bedridden but it never occurred to me it was from the vaccine because as a nurse I was brainwashed like the doctors. I never knew they had mercury - most people don't know that.
Doctors and nurses don't know what's in vaccines. We're not told we're poisoning people.
It happened to me and neither I nor the emergency room doctors even considered the vaccine was at fault, so believe me I know what I'm saying when I say doctors don't know.
You have to look at the different levels in the medical industry. Doctors are employees. Low level peons if you wish. They do as the they are told by the medical association and whatever. The doctor could be an honest person, but they are working within a corrupt system. Those high up in the politics of the medical industry are the ones calling the shots, and those with the big bucks (ie: Big Pharma) have the greatest influence. When politics and greed mix with science, its not good.
Raymond, your report is concerning and I hope that more is researched into how those 2 women died. Thanks for posting this here. 2 women in the US have also died a week or two after being vaccinated. Hard to know yet if there's cause-and-effect, but it should be investigated thoroughly.
I don't understand how there's already a study showing how the vaccine can raise risk of lesions. Hasn't the vaccine been out for a really short time? I also don't understand how there is zero link between HPV and cervical cancer--medical professionals are saying there is.
HPV is completely over hyped. It is what we call fear mongering. There are over 100 strains of HPV. Guess what... we all have it. HPV is simply a skin virus that produces warts if your pH level falls below 7. If you've ever had a wart on your hand, that's a strain of HPV. Only a few of the strains of HPV are "genital warts", and even fewer have the risk of causing cancer. This isn't an epidemic. Mike Adams has some flakey info, but overall, he is on the money.
We don;t all have it...and there are several strains not all of which cause carvical cancer. The strains that do are transmitted from male foreskin to the vagina, causing cancer later in life for some women. It is an STD.
We're all full or bateria, germs and misc viruses. At some point or another, we're made skin contact with someone else and contracted a wart on our hand, or foot or where ever. They are HPV warts. There are a few that are genital based, meaning these viruses flourish in warm, damp skin. Even the few strains that can cause cancer will only do so if the person's pH level falls too far into an acidic state. The Gardasail/HPV hype is fearmongering.
"We're all full or bacteria, germs and misc viruses" is true, however not all "bugs" exist on us naturally. For example, not everyone has syphilis, gonorrhea or herpes at any given moment. Same with HPV. The change in pH you are It has nothing to do with whether you have acquired HPV from someone else. referring to is a trigger for activation. Cancer is alot more complex than that.
No, that's correct. We don't have all viruses, but as contageous wart viruses are, the likelyhood that we do have them is very high. Even if never see or have an outbreak of them. The pH level just determines the likelyhood of an outbreak.
The European Medicines Agency ( the EMEA) has been informed "of the death of women who had been vaccinated with Gardasil®, including two reports concerning the sudden and unexplained death of two young women in the European Union."
One of these deaths occurred in Austria and the other in Germany. In neither case has it been possible to determine the cause of death.
I come back because I care about truth. I've read his story, I believe that he's well intentioned. Ask yourself the question below. If HPV really didn't cause cervical cancer, and that Gardasil worsened it, wouldn't it be on the news? Either the drug companies would snuff Mike out, or it would be the biggest news since Vioxx. But it hasn't happened. Because it isn't true! Mike doesn't know what he's talking about! the truth must be told!
chansen.....if you're such a non-believer, why do you keep coming back week after week? go to his site...do some searches.....read his story. you'll soon find out what we already know.
lilchico, your comment begs a great question....why havn't local and national media run this "breaking report"? Why aren't more people talking about it? Hmmm....could it be because Mike is incorrect in his statements? Yup, it looks that way. Now, I completely agree that there are some major misgivings about vaccinations in general, and HPV in specific. But Mike's report is still inaccurate and full of holes. And that's why I probably wouldn't bother emailing your doctor about this one.
yay for mike....now HOW do we do something about this. we can sit and agree (or disagree) with eachother al day, but we NEED to do something get out and inform!!!!!!!! bring this up in everyday conversations. Bring it up at school, at work, at dinner. Anything!!! e-mail your local doctors and talk to them!!!! Try the news stations!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Big Pharma would do anything to remain in your good spirts. Many more humans die each year from prscrptn drugs than are lost because of illegal drugs. Heath Ledger for example. The drug companies don't want to make you better they want to sell you more drugs. You have the internet at your disposal. Research - but know that Big Pharma will do anything to shut Mike (and guys like him) up. He is simply a healthy guy who figured out how to do it without drugs. Check his site. He's brilliant!
We live in a capitalistic society. Big corporations seek big profits and are obligated to do so in order to satisfy and attract more shareholders. They don't seeking to kill people, but people dying or being injured as a result of their drugs/vaccines is just collateral damage to them. They are not looking out for our best interest. Just their bottom line.
Yes....and I guess the people who blindly follow Mike Adams would be sheeple as well. Disagreement is a good thing, it fosters discussion and new ideas.
Mike states that HPV doesn't cause Cervical Cancer. Please show me the research to back this up. Mike has misinterpreted the way a report was written. It's so clear, that it is actually comical. It's like as if the report said "Most planes land safely, however they do occasionally crash, killing everyone on board", and Mike interprets this to mean "Planes never crash and people never die from plane crashes and so there is no need for emergency exits etc. on planes". It's quite funny.
show me just one study that proofs that HPV causes cancer. There is none. Just because they find HPV in a lot of cervical cancer patients does not proof that HPV is the cause. Maybe it has nothing to do with it and it is just pure coincidence. I would like to see a comparison of the general middle aged and older population to see how many of those have HPV but not cervical cancer . And then continue to monitor those until they die.
Knolle66 great question! In one study, they followed a group of women who had initially normal pap smears. They tested them for HPV and followed them for 5 years. HPV+ women were 3.8x more likely to have low grade lesions, and 12.7x more likely to have high grade lesions than those who were initially HPV-. I tried posting the link but it wouldn't let me. Google "Detection of Human Papillomavirus DNA in Cytologically Normal Women and Subsequent Cervical Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions"
IN a related study they followed 20,000 women who had initial normal paps for 10 years. In those initially + for HPV 16, 17.2% developed high-grade lesions or cancer. For the HPV 18 group, 13% developed it, For HPV- group 0.8% did. Google The Elevated 10-Year Risk of Cervical Precancer and Cancer in Women With Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Type 16 or 18 and the Possible Utility of Type-Specific HPV Testing in Clinical Practice
I have a friend having this disease,but she lives happy, too.She has many friends on this dating site(herpesfinder...com ).They encourage each other and love each other.
Mike, I'm sorry but you have NO idea what you're talking about. I know that people will accuse me of working for Merck (I'm not), but here's the truth. Mike Adams does not know how to read and interpret scientific reports.
HPV is strongly associated with cervical cancer. You are a disservice to the general public by spreading misinformation and fear Mike!
Mike you need to do more research before making videos and publishing articles on a topic you know little about.
Please remember that questioning the efficacy of a product is always a smart strategy before placing a foreign object into your body. Mike Adams makes some very interesting and poignant arguments. Perhaps before making derogatory statements, you should do a bit more investigation. Check FDA records yourself, and do not blindly follow the same company that brought such winners as Vioxx
I do not work for any pharmacuetical company. I am a graduate student at a faculty of Medicine in Canada. The point I am trying to make here is that Mike is using a JAMA study that is testing the use of the vaccine as treatment, and not as a preventative intervention. Please read the study.
Hoping as a grad student you're learning to be more skeptical of these marketing pushes. JAMA report studies efficacy of the vaccine with pre-existing infection. Forwarded all info to a well-regarded professor at a Univ (PHD/nurse practitioner, repeatedly invited to present at WHO internationally). Plans on researching further and publishing findings in Nursing Journal. Will update. Court mandated vaccination, if harmful to some=an alarming direction toward abatement of civil liberties.
This PhD that you talk of I suppose has previous peer reviewed publication. If so, I would love to read some of the articles and review his/her background. If there has been articles on the subject published by this "international lecturer" please cite them.
Measles Mumps and Rubella can be administered when the child's immune system is fully developed and separately with the mercury preservative taken out, and most parents don't know that.
I have messaged Mike to ask why he misused the JAMA study in this video 4 days ago. He has yet to reply. I urge everyone again not to make a decision on the vaccine according to an uneducated internet video broadcaster who does not even take the time to defend his arguements.
Karim, I agree with you. I have read the JAMA study, and the FDA reports, as well as Mike's article. He has misinterpreted what they say. He doesn't understand the pathophysiology of HPV and cervical cancer. He is part of the fear-mongering he is trying to fight....
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I feel that the public should understand that vaccination is crucial in promoting health across the world. Please do not take Mike's comments into consideration without consulting a medical doctor, who is further educated in scientific study and logic than Mike. "In women positive for HPV DNA, HPV-16/18 vaccination does not accelerate clearance of the virus and should not be used to treat prevalent infections."
In the study presented, the authors aimed to determine the efficacy of the vaccine in women with PRE-EXISTING infection. Indeed, the study did not find significant results stating a beneficial result of vaccine treatment. However, this study did not test the effect of the vaccine on preventing infection.
I have not read the article but from even just the bit he read it sounded like an article studying it as a therapudic vaccine, which is not the issue at hand. Presently it is only licensed for prevention of HPV not therapy of existing infection. I dont think he properly understood it or he is intentionally distorting the facts.
Good effort in trying to understand the JAMA article that was presented. I would however caution the use of the article in proving your case against the use of the HPV vaccine as a preventative measure against cervical cancer.
I like your expose' Thanks. I have been against this vaccine since it was in the Houston Chronicle, being touted by Gov. Perry. I'd read in emails, about the adverse side effects. Didn't know he got a payoff. Haven't seen anything in the Chronicle on the FDA reports that are more explicit. No one has advised against this in the papers. I fwd emails to others.
I was also outraged when Gov. Perry signed executive order to require vaccine for all Texas females in public schools. BUT as a high grade cervical dysplasia patient I can tell you (Mike) that there are something like 57 types of HPV viruses of which only 3 are associated with cervical dysplasia in med comunity. You did not show me enough evidence in this video to prove that there is NO link between those 3 HPV strands.
Congress turned the FDA over to Big Pharma, stating they knew about drugs, they should be in charge. Great, fox-in-the-hen- house. The FDA approves new drugs, which are supposed to be better than anything on the market, but now, new patents are issued with less investigation, and the newer ones are mirror images or clones of old ones. Public Citizen protests these drugs to ban them, or at put black box warnings on them.
Vaccines are not big money makers for drug co's. Generally the type of drugs which do well are things that you need to take daily for chronic conditions, such as hypertension. Also the most profitable drugs are antibiotics.
I would say the fact nobody in the last 2 or 3 generations of Americans has got polio or smallpox is pretty good evidence of vaccines usefulness.
It is really very shocking. I wish we could boycott Merck and close it down. This is an attempt to genocide. The people responsible should be arrested and jailed.
I do not know if this vaccination is safe or not but I know my own experience. I took the first stage of the Gardasil vaccination and after I became sick. I had a cold for 3 months straight! I am almost never ill. It was a semi mellow cold but I did have to stay in bed often because I was just so tired. I began to fear I had Aids, got tested and did not. I decided not to take the nest round of Gardasil because I was concerned about being sick again. Three months is a long time to be sick!
dreamerofhanuman 7 months ago
Dangerous scaremongering. This vaccination will save thousands of lives.
MindlessMeatPuppet 1 year ago
This is why lay people make me sad. HPV has many, many strains. Not all are detrimental to TNF. Types 6, 11, 16, and 18 destroy TNF. With no TNF, cervical cancer may arise.
HPV is carried by both sexes. Virus' don't know gender sadly. Take some of this extra time you have and read actual research.
DuluthMike 1 year ago
I'm just waiting for Merck to come out with a cooties vaccine for the under 7s.
Devilock79 1 year ago 5
This has been flagged as spam show
AAV-2 (Adeno Associated Virus 2) the Cure - google this and you will see. spread the word because it needs more support and funding to be released
westcoastnla 1 year ago
My daughter had all 3 HPV vaccine shots and had absolutely no ill effects - no loss of intelligence, no damage to bodily organs, no autism, no sudden death, no nothing, only a slight redness at the injection site.
The Hoax is what the Healthranger is trying to tell the public.
Weebots 2 years ago
Good job wee.
batigol47 2 years ago
Comment removed
K3Nshady 1 year ago
I'm going to quote the label:
Out of 25,274 people, there were 24 deaths total. (no difference between Placebo and experimental groups in # of deaths). The events reported were consistent with unrelated causes of death.
Causes of death:: motor vehicle accident, overdose/suicide, pulmonary thrombosis, sepsis, pancreatic cancer, arrhythmia, asphyxia...
Deaths not caused by vaccine, but due to random events or pre-existing disease.
Weebots 2 years ago
The conclusion that HPV vaccine causes disease based on the -47% number is incorrect on your part. That is a Confidence Interval, hence a negative number means there is no statistically significant correlation with that parameter.
Yet, you draw the false conclusion that there is a negative effect. In order to know if there was a negative effect, one has to look at the "Adverse Effects".
For HPV there was no difference between Placebo and Gardasil - no negative effect caused by Vaccine
Weebots 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You seem to say HPV clears up on it's own. Wrong. you were not aware that once you are infected - the virus stays latent in the body - ready to cause cancer or warts later in life.
"HPV rates high and not associated with cervical cancer" - simply means that not all HPVs cause cancer only about 15-20 out of about 40. You misunderstood!
Your conclusion that the HPV vaccine trial was "Junk Science" is completely unfounded. In fact, it is one of the most effective vaccines in history!!!
Weebots 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
RE: ridiculous assertions:
Boys/Men get warts and penile cancer caused by HPV, hence, they should be vaccinated also.
You misunderstood Therapeutic vs Prophylactic vaccines, leading to several false conclusions on your part. The HPV vaccine is prophylactic- look it up.
Regarding "lack of clearance of lesions" Those are pre-existing lesions, ie already infected individuals. The HPV vaccine works for those not previously infected.
Weebots 2 years ago
This is such a bunch of bull!! It's just poorly done shock journalism. This "Healthranger" is not a scientist, and yet he purports to know everything about vaccines and how they are dangerous to people. His evidence is non-existent, yet he talks on.
This is the modern day equivalent of the Flat-Earth Society. You have to just believe him, because all of the facts go against his claims.
Weebots 2 years ago
Oh man. Hold till after the regime change...
Really.
950horsepower 2 years ago
what a waste of time and resources: people need to go to uni!God, i don't even know why I'm commenting on this,my degree doesn't come this cheap!!!
mrxbellups 2 years ago
You really need to go to medical school before you make videos like this.
Because you have no idea what you're talking about.
stillhasnofear 2 years ago 3
Thank you.
950horsepower 2 years ago
What if the scientific evidence suggests that you are working with ulterior motives? What if you have no idea how to interpret the information you read? What if you are threatening the health of women?
Most is not all and the evidence is quite clear at this point that HPV does lead to cervical cancer. YOu give us this information yourself, because there wouldn't be a threat from the vaccine if it didn't.
Apparently logic, science, epidemiology and reading comprehension arent strong suits.
batigol47 2 years ago
You suggest he is threating the health of women? I am a woman and let me tell you what threatens the health of women -LYING to us that condoms protect against STDs (I did find it on a government NIH web site that condoms do NOT protect against HPV) and not telling women that the pill thins out the uterine lining making us MUCH more succeptable to STDs, not to mention the pill makes us gain weight and get depressed and irritable, and can cause stroke. THIS threatens the health of women!
Kentagurna 2 years ago
They tell you all of those things with the exception of a thin uterine wall increasing your std rate. Exactly what STD of the uterus do you get?
batigol47 2 years ago
translation: chances of developing CV (which cases have been decreasing) are far lesser vs. the chances of becoming ill after getting the vaccine.~ 8mil vaccines have been given out and 28 deaths and 8000 severe side effects(US data) + Spain? You do the math. this vaccine has only been out for 3 years and long term side effects are yet to be observed. It is still in test stage. speaking of "ulterior" motives. its called Merck making $40K/100 girls(usa) vaccinated.whos paying for that?
Nedethemovie 2 years ago
3,924 women died of cervical cancer in 2005. nearly 12000 new cases were diagnosed. The math is clear that the vaccine is the better alternative.
batigol47 2 years ago
watch?v=wg-52mHIjhs&feature=PlayList&p=955A1931D323A024&index=1 can i right a paper up telling you how to jump off a cliff
slonerider777 2 years ago
Thumbs up! You get a five star!
imthekingoftheworld 2 years ago
Mike, you're awesome! Thanks for having the courage to speak out against this outrageous injustice!
skydncr227 2 years ago 3
According to the report from Herpesloving . com, the new subscribers have increased 42% over 2007. Rising STD rate sparks online dating sites
maycala 2 years ago
brilliant vid. just goes to show that if people spent 5 mins looking for some info before takin these things we'd be ok. well done
tonglongkid 3 years ago
Thanks for making this video, Mike.
Everyone join NaturalNews . com
thinkrevolution 3 years ago
What exactly is it that you call "cervical cancer" ?
kolkrabe19 3 years ago
Read those documents; figure out how it fits together. Go yahoo groups, Lets talk about Gardasil, and kkrasnowwaterman(.)com. Read the posts by these girls and mothers that witnessed the damage and non recovered from outcomes. Go to all the links they provide, like cynthiajanak(.).com. How can you continue discount all this that girls are dying and some suffering to that degree, and continue to claiming no proof. There are several other sites with similar posts. Like it dont matter.
Antivax1 3 years ago
Most of vaccines are based on junk science, do a little reading if only from CDC, they don't hide it. Vaccination doesn't equal immunization. It is helpful to see what kind of damage occurs in the brain when one is vaccinated, it is very interesting read. Why would anyone want to inject a healthy young girl with a std virus from another person?
sonatime 3 years ago
The biggest fallacy is when the speaker shifts the burden of proof onto the audience to do the research for him. Post some links or you look like a delirious ranter.
rokth 3 years ago
thanks... i´ve already read information of the kind, in many information sites, and i totally agree. It´s no paranoia, and what was said in this video was appointed on FDA web-site. If you think that it´s a conspiracy theory... well, your problem. Go and watch Fox news...
biocida 3 years ago 4
You bet wrong. I have nothing to do with Merck. In fact, I a critic of Big Pharma and support the No Free Lunch movement. But criticizing the business practices of a company and dissing a life-saving vaccine are two very different things.
If you convince someone to refuse the vaccine who later dies of a preventable HPV related cancer, then you are responsible for that person's death. Are you willing to take that on? No, I didn't think so. And that's irresponsible.
jowojey 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Wow. This is remarkably irresponsible. As a clinician that treats HPV disease, and is involved in HPV research, I find the type of misinformation Mike Adams is peddling really scary.
jowojey 3 years ago
We find you being a shill, either unwittingly or knowingly for a dangerous, largely untested vaccine, scary.
At least you admit, by your own words, you are biased and have a conflict of interest. I bet you're on the payroll for Merck.
voiceliberty 3 years ago 2
that was a reply to jowojey
voiceliberty 3 years ago
If people are serious about preventing STIs in their teens they would BUY THEM CONDOMS.
sagekat3 3 years ago
Why am I not surprised its Merck again! Merck, Merck, Merck.
If people knew who was making the big bucks on this vaccine and many others, they would know they were being swindled and stop the madness.
truvelocity 3 years ago
I agree, remember when their drug Vioxx was pulled from the market in 2004?
daj4444 2 years ago
Yes, I do remember. My dad had a quadruple bi pass and he was prescribed Vioxx, next thing you know the doctor was taking him off of it... Now, get this... I've always known Vioxx causes heart problems long before it the drug was pulled... What took the doctor so long? If it weren't pulled, it would have killed my dad before his time. So you see? Doctors are not taught prevention, they are taught what to prescribe based on big billion dollar pharma. Wisdom people, it takes wisdom.
truvelocity 2 years ago
Thank You Thank You Thank You!! Please do more, on all the OTHER vaccine insanity going on - the childhood vaccines that our infants are getting, unnecessarily. All those infectious diseases were on their way OUT, long before the vaccine programs, etc etc etc.
turquoise54 3 years ago
i am SOO glad that i didn't give in to our pediatrician. when the vaccine first came out, i knew immediately my oldest, 16, wouldn't be getting one. her ped, however, had different plans & REALLY pressured me until i almost felt like a bad mom about saying no. now i feel like a super-mom! i almost lied & said that my daughter had already had sex just to stop the badgering! i also lied about my younger ones having had chicken pox so they wouldn't have to get those vaccines either!
momof3keelers 3 years ago 8
It's about time!!!! These pharmaceutical companies need to quit profiting by endangering our children! They are not guinea pigs! The were only 8 vaccines we had as children...now there are 36?? All because of the Pharm companies and their deep pockets giving hush money to the CDC to keep the dangers hidden! I just read there have been 1300+ deaths due to this vaccine. Ugh...
lindashoe2 3 years ago 3
i am doing a report on gardasil, and i have been looking into the statistics and death rates caused by it, i found only 8 deaths due to gardasil, i was wondering where you got your information from, i would really like to check whether or not my information is right.
katrinastewart104 3 years ago
yeah y would they say give ur 12 year old a shot in case she starts fucking! this stupid i knew it was something up when it first came out. i mean, all vaccines are, are like dormant forms of the virus so y would u want to inject a virus live or dead into ur body. i bet muthafuckas wouldnt do it if it was hiv so y would u do it and its cancer? be abstinent or committed. and if u choose commitment tell ur partner if they cheat and give u something u will kill them.and mean it
treasurecat03isme 3 years ago
Hey bostonpd this type of journalism is not dangerous! Free and open exchange of information and OPINION is a great thing!!
jwsoup 3 years ago
To follow up on my previous comment. It can be compared to melanoma or lung cancer. We know that smoking increases the risk of lung cancer. Do all smokers get lung cancer? No. Sunburns increase the risk of skin cancer. Does everyone who has a sunburn get melanoma? Aboslutely not. HPV is a cause of cervical cancer. Does everyone infected with HPV get cancer? Absolutely not. That does not mean it isn't the major cause. The E6 and E7 proteins disrupt normal cell cycle and can cause cancer.
bostonpd 3 years ago
Thank you for your honest and professional opinion. If you read my comments under the other "Gardisil HPV Hoax" link, I agree with you completely. This is not about pharmaceutical companies, its about medical advancements. Be greatful that we now have the options to immunize our bodies before we are infected with deadly diseases.. But everyone is entitled to their opinion. I say, educate youself on this before you jump to conclusions. And don't believe every website/youtube video you see.
kacie216 3 years ago
I will start by saying I have an MD and a PhD in molecular biology. I currently study cancer formation and metastasis and have many publications in the field. I can assure all the readers that HPV infection is absolutely the most common cause of cervical cancer. Most women who are infected with HPV do not get cancer. The problem is that many do. There are many types of HPV, some of which are much more likely to cause cervival cancer. This type of "journalism" is dangerous.
bostonpd 3 years ago
Free speech is not dangerous. Hiding information is.
sagekat3 3 years ago 3
Fucking dimwit. This is just what Mike is talking about- idiots like yourself. HPV infections do NOT cause cancer!
jankspheasantfarm 3 years ago
So in your opinion it is better for young girls to suffer now with ill health,or even death, than possibly later in life after they had a chance to raise a family and after they had a chance of a happy , productive life?
Your opinion is sooooo dumb, and you are EDUCATED ????
knolle66 2 years ago
This was in response to a "bostonpd" message 9 month ago.
The reply didn't tag on that particular message for some reason.
knolle66 2 years ago
knolle66 is a sheeple O BAAAAAA MA O BAAAAA MA O BAAAAA MA .... Say it over and over again then you will realy sound like a sheep.
porphyria2 2 years ago
At last, the Gardasil scandalis blown wide open!
Everybody is concerned with such incomplete and downright mediocre vaccines being forced onto kids.
Money and the FDA are in the same bed... and it's a very serious issue.
webzenstar 3 years ago
THANK YOU!!! Everybody is supporting this vaccine blindly. Thank you!
Mandy30008 3 years ago 2
6. Some women do clear the vaccine themselves. But that applies to the very few and what about the ones who don't? will you take that risk?
7. Gardasil is so new that long term effects cannot be established so I don't know where he got the evidence that this
There are so many problems with this add I will need whole day to explain. So that's it from me
hox172 3 years ago
Big corporations seek big profits and are obligated to do so in order to satisfy and attract more shareholders. They seek to kill people, people are dying or being injured as a result of their drugs/vaccines and it is just collateral damage to them. They are not looking out for our best interest. Just their bottom line.
BFreeButrFly 3 years ago
he just said "most are not related to cervical cancer".. yeah "most".. but some do...
musicmancbj 3 years ago
As a woman let me say that this guy has ABSOLUTELY no idea what he is talking about. This is complete bs. Talk about being harmful to women...get the correct info from a non-partisian source, a women's health center, etc. This misinformation is just dangerous.
arcanesugar 3 years ago
From the FDA report he quotes:
"Women who have normal Pap test results and no HPV infection are at very low risk (0.2%) for developing cervical cancer. Women who have an abnormal Pap test and a positive HPV test are at higher risk (6%-7% or greater) of developing cervical cancer if not treated"
"Knowing whether or not a woman is infected with highrisk HPV is added information that will help physicians detect and treat early cell changes that might eventually lead to cervical cancer"
chansen1970 3 years ago
Thank you for your research. We need more people like you in the world.
AlishaDawne 3 years ago
RL Viddy
-You're right, almost all medical professionals agree that HPV is a major (if not neccessary) cause of Cervical Cancer. This is where Mike Adams is completely off-base. He just misinterpreted a few reports, that's all. I know he means well, but he should read those reports a little bit closer.
chansen1970 4 years ago
But the press release Mike cited specified that the virus isn't associated with it. Seems pretty clear cut case of someone is lying to me. Mike has nothing to gain from lying, but pharma people do...
RLviddy 4 years ago
No it actually doesn't say this. What is says is that "most (HPV) infections are short-lived and not associated with cervical cancer."
This is true; MOST times one gets HPV it goes away. But on occasion it won't go away and then it is associated with Cancer. An analogy would be "Most teenage drivers are safe and not associated with car crashes". This is true, but doesn't change the fact that MVAs are the #1 killers for teens in America. Does this make sense?
chansen1970 4 years ago
It is after years of chronic HPV infection that it goes on to be CC, and did I mention that HPV eradicates itself from the body 92% of the time?
daj4444 2 years ago
That's right. And the 8% of time where it doesn't clear results in 4000 deaths in the US every year, not to mention 250,000 worldwide.
chansen1970 2 years ago
Let's see if the HPV vaccine makes those 4000 deaths drop, huh? What if it doesn't, what if it gets worse even after the vaccines? Time will tell, but I am not having my daughters take it.
truvelocity 2 years ago
(4000 per year in the US....worldwide it's estimated to be about about 200,000).
chansen1970 4 years ago
Fauztran, you're right Cervical Cancer isn't an epidemic, but about 4000 women die each year from it, and lots more get surgery/chemo for it. And we have pretty good screening methods (ie. Pap tests) to try and catch it early when it's easy to treat. The vaccine is probably more suited for developing nations where it's the number 2 cancer in women (since there aren't great screening programs).
chansen1970 4 years ago
I'm not a believer in vaccines. I haven't read anything convincing that they do work. For now, I can only see them as a source of continuous income.
Regarding the Gardasail vaccine, there are have been a few reported deaths due to it. Many have claimed burning pains at the injection site, and some are passing out.
If you want to prevent cancer, or other ailments, learn about Antoine Bechamp and Claude Bernard's Terrain Theory. Its a better understanding of how the body works.
fauztran 4 years ago
fauztran: Are you implying that everyone since Pasteur has been wrong about vaccines? Has the entire scientific community never realized this, or did and kept silent in a 130-year-long conspiracy? Haven't any rebel doctors ever come up against it? Or have we all been kept on the dark about them?
rafvrab 4 years ago
They have known since the beginning - if you look up drug company studies you will find vaccines can't provide immunity.
The vaccines always come out after an outbreak occurs and the disease rates have gone down. After vaccination, disease rates rise again, dramatically. This is also well documented.
Doctors only read medical journals, which receive millions of $ from drug companies, who make $1 billion each year off vaccines. I never studied this in school and I used to give vaccines.
OliviaHadassah 4 years ago
OliviaHadassah: Well, that last statement is only partially true. I don't know about the practice of medical ethics in the States, but being both my grandfathers medical doctors, I know there are honest doctors who observe what happens to their patients, and may act differently from what a medical journal suggests if they experience negative results with their own patients.
If this is indeed true, I'd like to understand what has happened for the past 130 years since vaccines were invented.
rafvrab 4 years ago
Doctors don't know the reactions are coming from the vaccines because they are brainwashed to believe they are safe. People drive to emergency rooms claiming their child had a seizure just after being vaccinated, and they're told to continue the vaccination series. Many babies were healthy until 18 months when they received their 3rd shot of mercury, then suddenly they're autistic.
OliviaHadassah 4 years ago
I was seriously ill from a vaccination myself and bedridden but it never occurred to me it was from the vaccine because as a nurse I was brainwashed like the doctors. I never knew they had mercury - most people don't know that.
Doctors and nurses don't know what's in vaccines. We're not told we're poisoning people.
It happened to me and neither I nor the emergency room doctors even considered the vaccine was at fault, so believe me I know what I'm saying when I say doctors don't know.
OliviaHadassah 4 years ago
You have to look at the different levels in the medical industry. Doctors are employees. Low level peons if you wish. They do as the they are told by the medical association and whatever. The doctor could be an honest person, but they are working within a corrupt system. Those high up in the politics of the medical industry are the ones calling the shots, and those with the big bucks (ie: Big Pharma) have the greatest influence. When politics and greed mix with science, its not good.
fauztran 3 years ago 3
Exactly. The guys in charge of the drug industry know they are killing people, and the doctors are brainwashed into obedience.
OliviaHadassah 3 years ago
Raymond, your report is concerning and I hope that more is researched into how those 2 women died. Thanks for posting this here. 2 women in the US have also died a week or two after being vaccinated. Hard to know yet if there's cause-and-effect, but it should be investigated thoroughly.
chansen1970 4 years ago
I don't understand how there's already a study showing how the vaccine can raise risk of lesions. Hasn't the vaccine been out for a really short time? I also don't understand how there is zero link between HPV and cervical cancer--medical professionals are saying there is.
RLviddy 4 years ago
HPV is completely over hyped. It is what we call fear mongering. There are over 100 strains of HPV. Guess what... we all have it. HPV is simply a skin virus that produces warts if your pH level falls below 7. If you've ever had a wart on your hand, that's a strain of HPV. Only a few of the strains of HPV are "genital warts", and even fewer have the risk of causing cancer. This isn't an epidemic. Mike Adams has some flakey info, but overall, he is on the money.
fauztran 4 years ago
We don;t all have it...and there are several strains not all of which cause carvical cancer. The strains that do are transmitted from male foreskin to the vagina, causing cancer later in life for some women. It is an STD.
amiriliano 4 years ago
We're all full or bateria, germs and misc viruses. At some point or another, we're made skin contact with someone else and contracted a wart on our hand, or foot or where ever. They are HPV warts. There are a few that are genital based, meaning these viruses flourish in warm, damp skin. Even the few strains that can cause cancer will only do so if the person's pH level falls too far into an acidic state. The Gardasail/HPV hype is fearmongering.
fauztran 4 years ago
"We're all full or bacteria, germs and misc viruses" is true, however not all "bugs" exist on us naturally. For example, not everyone has syphilis, gonorrhea or herpes at any given moment. Same with HPV. The change in pH you are It has nothing to do with whether you have acquired HPV from someone else. referring to is a trigger for activation. Cancer is alot more complex than that.
amiriliano 4 years ago
No, that's correct. We don't have all viruses, but as contageous wart viruses are, the likelyhood that we do have them is very high. Even if never see or have an outbreak of them. The pH level just determines the likelyhood of an outbreak.
fauztran 4 years ago
28 January 2008 - 11:36]
The European Medicines Agency ( the EMEA) has been informed "of the death of women who had been vaccinated with Gardasil®, including two reports concerning the sudden and unexplained death of two young women in the European Union."
One of these deaths occurred in Austria and the other in Germany. In neither case has it been possible to determine the cause of death.
raymondrife 4 years ago
Anyone that listens to this hole is retarded...just plain retarded!
s3ik5 4 years ago
Go back to school chansen and learn.
462659 4 years ago
I come back because I care about truth. I've read his story, I believe that he's well intentioned. Ask yourself the question below. If HPV really didn't cause cervical cancer, and that Gardasil worsened it, wouldn't it be on the news? Either the drug companies would snuff Mike out, or it would be the biggest news since Vioxx. But it hasn't happened. Because it isn't true! Mike doesn't know what he's talking about! the truth must be told!
chansen1970 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Download 46min mp3 on HPV here:
w ww,hotlinkfiles,com/browse/downloads/48892
hctiwtac 4 years ago
chansen.....if you're such a non-believer, why do you keep coming back week after week? go to his site...do some searches.....read his story. you'll soon find out what we already know.
lauraleesalmi 4 years ago
lilchico, your comment begs a great question....why havn't local and national media run this "breaking report"? Why aren't more people talking about it? Hmmm....could it be because Mike is incorrect in his statements? Yup, it looks that way. Now, I completely agree that there are some major misgivings about vaccinations in general, and HPV in specific. But Mike's report is still inaccurate and full of holes. And that's why I probably wouldn't bother emailing your doctor about this one.
chansen1970 4 years ago
yay for mike....now HOW do we do something about this. we can sit and agree (or disagree) with eachother al day, but we NEED to do something get out and inform!!!!!!!! bring this up in everyday conversations. Bring it up at school, at work, at dinner. Anything!!! e-mail your local doctors and talk to them!!!! Try the news stations!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
lilchico4wg 4 years ago
Big Pharma would do anything to remain in your good spirts. Many more humans die each year from prscrptn drugs than are lost because of illegal drugs. Heath Ledger for example. The drug companies don't want to make you better they want to sell you more drugs. You have the internet at your disposal. Research - but know that Big Pharma will do anything to shut Mike (and guys like him) up. He is simply a healthy guy who figured out how to do it without drugs. Check his site. He's brilliant!
lauraleesalmi 4 years ago 2
money isn't that great, why would they lie to the people about all this...thanx...
wasy35 4 years ago
We live in a capitalistic society. Big corporations seek big profits and are obligated to do so in order to satisfy and attract more shareholders. They don't seeking to kill people, but people dying or being injured as a result of their drugs/vaccines is just collateral damage to them. They are not looking out for our best interest. Just their bottom line.
fauztran 3 years ago
Mike is right and everyone who disagrees is a bloody idiotic sheeple.
TheRantingSam 4 years ago
Yes....and I guess the people who blindly follow Mike Adams would be sheeple as well. Disagreement is a good thing, it fosters discussion and new ideas.
chansen1970 4 years ago
Or we could blindly put our trust in Big Pharma?
fauztran 3 years ago
SORRY, MIKE IS RIGHT
You need to go back and read and understand
what you have read. Do the research and verify
the lingo they use.
462659 4 years ago
Mike states that HPV doesn't cause Cervical Cancer. Please show me the research to back this up. Mike has misinterpreted the way a report was written. It's so clear, that it is actually comical. It's like as if the report said "Most planes land safely, however they do occasionally crash, killing everyone on board", and Mike interprets this to mean "Planes never crash and people never die from plane crashes and so there is no need for emergency exits etc. on planes". It's quite funny.
chansen1970 4 years ago
to chancen1970:
show me just one study that proofs that HPV causes cancer. There is none. Just because they find HPV in a lot of cervical cancer patients does not proof that HPV is the cause. Maybe it has nothing to do with it and it is just pure coincidence. I would like to see a comparison of the general middle aged and older population to see how many of those have HPV but not cervical cancer . And then continue to monitor those until they die.
knolle66 2 years ago
Knolle66 great question! In one study, they followed a group of women who had initially normal pap smears. They tested them for HPV and followed them for 5 years. HPV+ women were 3.8x more likely to have low grade lesions, and 12.7x more likely to have high grade lesions than those who were initially HPV-. I tried posting the link but it wouldn't let me. Google "Detection of Human Papillomavirus DNA in Cytologically Normal Women and Subsequent Cervical Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions"
chansen1970 2 years ago 3
IN a related study they followed 20,000 women who had initial normal paps for 10 years. In those initially + for HPV 16, 17.2% developed high-grade lesions or cancer. For the HPV 18 group, 13% developed it, For HPV- group 0.8% did. Google The Elevated 10-Year Risk of Cervical Precancer and Cancer in Women With Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Type 16 or 18 and the Possible Utility of Type-Specific HPV Testing in Clinical Practice
chansen1970 2 years ago 3
Comment removed
dogcow666 2 years ago
knolle66: I think I would take your point more seriously if you knew how to spell the word "prove" correctly.
dogcow666 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I have a friend having this disease,but she lives happy, too.She has many friends on this dating site(herpesfinder...com ).They encourage each other and love each other.
fyanzi 4 years ago
Mike, I'm sorry but you have NO idea what you're talking about. I know that people will accuse me of working for Merck (I'm not), but here's the truth. Mike Adams does not know how to read and interpret scientific reports.
HPV is strongly associated with cervical cancer. You are a disservice to the general public by spreading misinformation and fear Mike!
Mike you need to do more research before making videos and publishing articles on a topic you know little about.
chansen1970 4 years ago
Finally someone who understands that Mike has little to no scientific knowledge on the subject.
karim758463 4 years ago 3
Mike is awesome and makes a lot of sense !!!
knolle66 2 years ago
Mike gets an A+
He did his homework
462659 4 years ago
Katrim, do you work for Merck?
Please remember that questioning the efficacy of a product is always a smart strategy before placing a foreign object into your body. Mike Adams makes some very interesting and poignant arguments. Perhaps before making derogatory statements, you should do a bit more investigation. Check FDA records yourself, and do not blindly follow the same company that brought such winners as Vioxx
meridian41 4 years ago
I do not work for any pharmacuetical company. I am a graduate student at a faculty of Medicine in Canada. The point I am trying to make here is that Mike is using a JAMA study that is testing the use of the vaccine as treatment, and not as a preventative intervention. Please read the study.
karim758463 4 years ago 3
Hoping as a grad student you're learning to be more skeptical of these marketing pushes. JAMA report studies efficacy of the vaccine with pre-existing infection. Forwarded all info to a well-regarded professor at a Univ (PHD/nurse practitioner, repeatedly invited to present at WHO internationally). Plans on researching further and publishing findings in Nursing Journal. Will update. Court mandated vaccination, if harmful to some=an alarming direction toward abatement of civil liberties.
meridian41 4 years ago
This PhD that you talk of I suppose has previous peer reviewed publication. If so, I would love to read some of the articles and review his/her background. If there has been articles on the subject published by this "international lecturer" please cite them.
karim758463 4 years ago
I agree about court mandated vaccination that should not be allowed. if you are foolish enough not to have you kid vaccinated for MMR then so be it.
dogcow666 2 years ago
Measles Mumps and Rubella can be administered when the child's immune system is fully developed and separately with the mercury preservative taken out, and most parents don't know that.
truvelocity 2 years ago
I have messaged Mike to ask why he misused the JAMA study in this video 4 days ago. He has yet to reply. I urge everyone again not to make a decision on the vaccine according to an uneducated internet video broadcaster who does not even take the time to defend his arguements.
karim758463 4 years ago
Karim, I agree with you. I have read the JAMA study, and the FDA reports, as well as Mike's article. He has misinterpreted what they say. He doesn't understand the pathophysiology of HPV and cervical cancer. He is part of the fear-mongering he is trying to fight....
chansen1970 4 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I feel that the public should understand that vaccination is crucial in promoting health across the world. Please do not take Mike's comments into consideration without consulting a medical doctor, who is further educated in scientific study and logic than Mike. "In women positive for HPV DNA, HPV-16/18 vaccination does not accelerate clearance of the virus and should not be used to treat prevalent infections."
karim758463 4 years ago
"This message was kindly brought to you by Big Pharma."
Leave Mike alone you moron.
TheRantingSam 4 years ago
karim758463:
You have been brainwashed by experts.
Neville
nevillediener 4 years ago
In the study presented, the authors aimed to determine the efficacy of the vaccine in women with PRE-EXISTING infection. Indeed, the study did not find significant results stating a beneficial result of vaccine treatment. However, this study did not test the effect of the vaccine on preventing infection.
karim758463 4 years ago
I have not read the article but from even just the bit he read it sounded like an article studying it as a therapudic vaccine, which is not the issue at hand. Presently it is only licensed for prevention of HPV not therapy of existing infection. I dont think he properly understood it or he is intentionally distorting the facts.
dogcow666 2 years ago
Good effort in trying to understand the JAMA article that was presented. I would however caution the use of the article in proving your case against the use of the HPV vaccine as a preventative measure against cervical cancer.
karim758463 4 years ago
Mike, you are a raw superhero! Keep up the best work ever!
aphrocacao 4 years ago
I like your expose' Thanks. I have been against this vaccine since it was in the Houston Chronicle, being touted by Gov. Perry. I'd read in emails, about the adverse side effects. Didn't know he got a payoff. Haven't seen anything in the Chronicle on the FDA reports that are more explicit. No one has advised against this in the papers. I fwd emails to others.
delicado20 4 years ago 4
I was also outraged when Gov. Perry signed executive order to require vaccine for all Texas females in public schools. BUT as a high grade cervical dysplasia patient I can tell you (Mike) that there are something like 57 types of HPV viruses of which only 3 are associated with cervical dysplasia in med comunity. You did not show me enough evidence in this video to prove that there is NO link between those 3 HPV strands.
thevideoqueen 4 years ago
Congress turned the FDA over to Big Pharma, stating they knew about drugs, they should be in charge. Great, fox-in-the-hen- house. The FDA approves new drugs, which are supposed to be better than anything on the market, but now, new patents are issued with less investigation, and the newer ones are mirror images or clones of old ones. Public Citizen protests these drugs to ban them, or at put black box warnings on them.
delicado20 4 years ago
mike adams for president !
shweeny666 4 years ago 6
yeah mike!
trumpet12345 4 years ago
Mike, you're doing great informing people with your reports and references about HPV fraud.
It's just mind bungling why USA Media, the USA Government, does not do anything about the fraud to inform everybody.
bajhista65 4 years ago 2
Great work! Thanks for your persistence and insights!
lmfstyle 4 years ago 2
Mike is always willing to tell the truth, nothing held back. Vaccines are dangerous, useless and profitable, end of story.
herbaljeff55 4 years ago
Vaccines are not big money makers for drug co's. Generally the type of drugs which do well are things that you need to take daily for chronic conditions, such as hypertension. Also the most profitable drugs are antibiotics.
I would say the fact nobody in the last 2 or 3 generations of Americans has got polio or smallpox is pretty good evidence of vaccines usefulness.
dogcow666 2 years ago
Have you seen the stock market for vaccines? - Huge money maker.
truvelocity 2 years ago
Way to go mike.
It is really very shocking. I wish we could boycott Merck and close it down. This is an attempt to genocide. The people responsible should be arrested and jailed.
Merck should be banned.
qwanraj 4 years ago
Keep it simple. Drugs should be banned.
fauztran 3 years ago