Added: 4 weeks ago
From: TheGUNNShop
Views: 27,694
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (935)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • do this for star wars battlefront 3

  • Loooked annoyingly boring, just constant blasting, no cover n' fun really, would be good, if they put these guys in a city structure, rather than blast blast blast, across nothing.... BORING.

    don't hate it's just my opinion it'd be really fun, if they added structures with a lot of floors, like room clearing skyscrapers and stuff, rather than just laser beam bwah!! die in 2 seconds, and people typing up the side complaining, like ' i'm not in ' ' has it started yet ' if you guys read the side.

  • dumb idea

  • fuck bf and cod get this for halo!!!!!!!!!!

  • hey, whats the player count for dust 514?

  • 583 man collateral 360 no scope rpg with fmj

  • Somebody never played MAG.

  • @weskerslonglostbro1O just bought mag the other day for the 2nd time

  • if you have a kill death ratio better than 0.10 on that you'd be considered pro

  • Gunns has been mislead. These people have set a world record, that only. They are not planning on making a game with 1000. They said that themselves. So everyone calm down.

  • I hope you get up off your fat ass and fight in a real war rather than talk about how amazing it is.

  • i hope it would b better then mag

  • this sounds so epic

  • 123 man spray

  • This sounds amazing!

  • By the size of Battlefield, guys, he was referring to te total length (and maybe a little shorter) of the full maps. They'd definately need to be WIDER, the LENGTH is just fine.

  • 1000p operation metro conquest, 1500 tickets. Oh yeah. Every fucking meter filled with 3 people. With 64p is a fucking caos.

  • I think it would be sweet but the maps would need to be way bigger than the battlefield maps. Probably 3x or maybe even 5x. I mean yea you can play on a regular battlefield map but to have fun with this you would need to be able to spawn without having 300 guys shooting at you instantly.

  • 500 v 500 S&D, Real War Here I Come

  • @simmynosolli You will never see a 500 vs 500 SND in CoDs copy paste engine.

  • that will be the best thing made by man in years, take that ipod!

  • 500 v 500 s and d

  • congrats my good man... my mind just exploded from an epic overload

  • I don't think we'll see anything like this in a developed stage for quite a while. While this is an interesting step, if they are to implement vehicles or any perks of that nature, the maps would have to be massive. Imagine 500 people fighting on Kharg Island or Caspian Border on BF3. Maybe you would need to have napalm strikes for perks to move up, eh'?

  • @DanteDiLuca Kharg ISland wouldn't work with 1000, but Caspian Border could

  • Think of how long it would tske to get 1000 people in a lobby

  • u be like tik bob bob tik

  • Image this on BF with1080p and 100tanks,jets,boats and even a drivable battleship. If BF made that it would outsell all the Cods combined

  • @STEALTHASSASINq 500 on 500 jet mayhem >:]

  • @STEALTHASSASINq BF3 is bs now no offense i love the previous BF's but this one tried to be like cod. It kills games who try to follow cods lead. Every game company who has done that has failed over previous years. Don't get me wrong BF3 has it's pluses with its frostbite engine which is amazing

  • @STEALTHASSASINq

    DAMN!!!! That would be FUCKING AWESOME!

  • @STEALTHASSASINq Na I would not want BF making a game like that. Arma 2 designers> BF

  • 500 guys with noob tubes XD

  • @XxDejavuzZXx -.-

  • WHATEVER HAPPENED TO THE INTRO TO THE GUNNSHOP? With all the cannons and such?

  • Pc.

  • 500 vs 500 is a realistic battle size.

  • MAG 2 xD

  • Think about Halo. 500 reds and Blues!

  • lol imagine that in battlefieald3

    With 100 jets on each side

  • @HMKfilms360 great 100 pepople camping the jets and crashing just after takeoff xD

  • the future is going to be awesome

  • It would be EPIC for arma :D

  • Who the hell dislikes these videos?

  • it sounds interesting and very different from the average FPS games out now. i hope they are able to make it work properly cuz i see a lot of problems with it already. who knows tho, maybe the devs will have some good ideas for it. i know one thing tho, there will be some EPIC battles taking place if this game is made! i wud definitely play it! let's see what happens tho. hey what about Dust 514? that game sounds a lot like how this is! MMO FPS/RPG. i'm really looking forward to that game!

  • idk, 500 vs 500 would get pretty insane, and hard to get kills, i like the idea of realistic sized armies going into battle, but maybe something a bit smaller first, like 300 vs 300 or 200 vs 200? i would say that is certainly a step up from 36 or 48 player matches and would be pretty epic even though its not 1000 players, i think the cut back on the additional 700 or 800 players would leave room for buildings and scenery i personally am a PC gaming, so i would have no issues with my PC for it

  • they would need a super server actually a mega sever

  • COD booster are fucked....

  • Lol MAG sucked ass...

  • recreate the world and let 100 people into each country and attack each other :D Hilarious.

  • @TBrays1118 I've played on modded CoD 4 maps in which you die if you camp for more then 5 minutes.

  • @Erik0219 I've played modded CoD 4 maps in which you die if you camp for more then 5 minutes.

  • wait for 20 years, and we wil have cutting edge graphics and 1000 people online.

  • Pfffff, Eve Online is ONE server and any one time 30,000 + players are playing at anyone time.  I myself have been in battles abouve a planet with 800 players per side.

  • lol AC130 100 killfeed!!!!

  • dust 514

  • MAG's mechanics, gameplay and even graphics (if I may) at release were dreadful. The game was tinny, the guns looked squashed and wrong. Animations were sub-par. Some of the maps were TOO big that you'd have to run around to try and find someone because everyone would be sitting at the middle camping some building. It just felt static, strange and wrong.

    I think a better example of this mass-battleground experience is EVE Online. They can already hold 60k odd people in one server and then have

  • Everyone talking about MAG has a point. Except this man vs. machine is still 4x bigger! That's insane.

  • If a game like this comes out snipers better not be one hit kill . Also if this was a melee based game it would become a huge cluster fuck.

  • I love MAG even to this day because it feels like a real war.

  • i just wathced the vid that is so awsome

  • There's this amazing game called MAG... It is action packed and so damn good.

  • 500 vs 500, only make swords and shields the weapons instead of guns.. Someone needs to make a nice melee only multiplayer game and I'm not talking about an MMO like WoW... I mean like skyrim but multiplayer style :P

  • Gunns ever heard of Mag lol

  • Mag has up to 256

    And battlefield 3 has 64 on pc wich is so boss :)

  • lol gunns is wrong

    if people wanted to in planetside they could have 1000 players in the same place

    i HAVE been in those 1000 player battles in 2004

  • bah nothing special

    planetside did 1200 players in 2003

    there is a sequel coming - hopefully it will be just as big

  • Not a good idea imagine when people find glitches

  • minecraft. 3 modes.... single player/multiplayer/ and world server. every player shares ONE world :)

  • could you imagine a D-Day recration with this? O.O

  • This guy need's to get a life i mean i like his vid's but he's already posted 9 today

  • or maybe the game will never end, so u just jump in anytime u want and exit ou when ever u want, caus i know i wouldnt want to wait in line to get into a game aha

  • Image, Call of Duty Like That, Nukes,Sniping,moabs all Day

  • The game is called M.A.G,,, Lol

  • MAG was the first game to have a 256 player multiplayer if anyone can do it its Sony.

  • i want a multi-kill montage!

  • 1000 person free-for-all. <3

  • can someone say CoD killer?

  • @PapaSmurfWasHigh No? Not even close

  • @alwaysFSX Hahahahahahaha no definitely not this game, but I meant if they buff up graphics and whatnot, this will be the new CoD killer. It just looks like so much fucking fun

  • the actual video of the game reminds me of Saving Private Ryan hahah

  • epic spawn trap

  • 1000 player S&D that would be heaven for someone like me who loves search

  • lol lag in call of duty?

    please as soon as a killcam goes off the game will crash

    its way too much ram

  • 999 People + Planetside - SoE - Sub = Epiiiiiiic!

  • wow that game looks crazy

  • its going to look like ass

  • Sounds like a pc exclusive... win.

  • hey mag had 256 players, and still sucked.

  • @0XAciDRaiNX0 mag did not suck, i loved that game

  • @RlKE153 i felt that the statement to describe the development was " OK guys we got 256 players on one map.....now what?".

  • dont let cod make the servers

  • best way for xbox and ps3 to have a cross console game....ps3 on one side and xbox on the other

  • @plegmaenatos but then the teams would be unbalanced becuase with my experience with fps online games like cod, xbox players are better then ps3 players

  • That would be pretty cool but then again EVERYONE would need to have a Good internet connection ..

  • if they do perfect this they would need maps Battlefield size!

  • @deadlus16 a bit bigger i think

  • A Gladiator arena with authentic historical weapons with hundreds of people would be cool too. Not just MW or COD franchise but Assassins Creed, actually trying to assassinate people in a huge world. So many things you could do.

  • mw3 1000 players spawns = :/

  • OMFG mw3 with 1000 people... there would be nowhere to camp!!! omg omg omg we need this now!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @TheKinglyProduction lol you couldnt move on those midget ass maps

  • SKYRIM ONLINE 1000 PEOPLE AT ONCE :OOOOO

  • @XxSYCOSLAYER15xX Sounds like a MMO.

  • @Bronx1875 no. an mmo has multiple servers.. this is one server with 1000 people on it simultaneously

  • Explosions...explosions everywhere o_o

  • one thing future battlefield

  • Hell yea! that sounds amazing gunn. And their are people that know what they are doing

  • MAG had 256 game battles.

  • I think it would be sick to have that kind of tech in a game like Borderland. 500+ people going around a massive world helping eachother.

  • a lord of ring in first person 500 vs 500 just charging at orcs and stuff that would be awesome game

  • @1991azzy Best. Idea. EVER!!!

  • im a troll

  • @biIIybob42081 oh shit ur billy bob thorton? u shud have married angelina jolie lol

  • So u wANT A bigger mag ? That's what it sounds like

  • 1000 people on a BF3 map would be nowhere near big enough.

  • What hes saying sounds like MAG its a good game it can have 256 players in one game its not 1000 but its a amazing game but needs to be tweaked

    also Aces high 2 has battles that go on for days but its a flight and vehicle warfare

    if these 2 games were put together we would have a cod killer

  • Real war isnt Fun

    

  • can you imagine 1000 players on Nuketown!

  • @T55Storm lol =1death ecery 1sec? lol

  • planetside 2 looks well better

  • there trying to go better than mag

  • OMG... LAAAAAAAG!

  • MAG on PS3 had 256, this will be fun.

  • mw3 infected 999 people i am the final survivor even god mode wont save me here 998 stabs a second :)

  • MMORPGFPSRTS... how many times have i got to say :p

  • The future of war! and I think If we did war with out any one ever dieing or getting killed, then after that would be No war and Peace! A dream but much better then the other!

  • I imagine Killzone 4 having 256 players, with the objective to push the enemy faction out of the city. That would be EPIC!.

  • @magicman2457

    PC would win... By far...

    Xbox live used to be able to connect to pc players but the console player complained because PC uses mouse and keyboard which is WAY more accurate than controller

  • FUCKIN AWESOME

  • they need A fucking huge map

  • Haha! Image this, but in a city and it's zombies versus the humans :'D

  • @LucanLuamero and it would combine gta4 freedom with far cry shootings :D

  • @LucanLuamero That would be awesome but it would need to not be on these current gen consoles. Lag would be too much.

  • @LucanLuamero Great idea! Although would it be like Left For Dead or something else?

  • @LucanLuamero THAT'S. SUCH. A. GOOD. IDEA.

  • The 153rd guy from the left was camping

  • Wizzing all over the place ha

  • 500 vs 500?

    Just call it

    Prepare to Die

  • Imagine 500 vs 500 Search & Destroy!

  • MAG?

    

  • Imagine it battlefield with whole city maps with even at least 100ppl like 5v5 jets having a dogfight 15 tanks each tons of jeeps boats and transport choppers wow the possibilities

  • 1000 players in 1 game = me + 499 idiots vs 500 1337 and pro players... ALWAYS LIKE THAT!

  • Dust 514. It seems interesting, although I'm not much of an si-fi lover. The best clan battle I've never played was on mag. Search them YouTube. It makes socom look bs in tactical and team oriented warfare.

  • Mag had absolutely no lag or problems until the patches came after 2.00 and the takedown of servers. Players like me used to go 90 kills average on a sabotage game. Now 50 to 80 average on sabo. Also there is absolutely now way 500 vs. 500 is going to happen until a few years or decades later. Mag has 256, however it is mostly 16 vs. 16 or 32 vs. 32. Although escalation has 32 vs 32 vs 32. Looking forward to dust

  • Gotta put it on arma!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • spawn trapping on that LOL

  • i cant even imagine what games (and porn) will be like in 20 years. lol

  • Zipper Interactive made MAG (256 players)! I would prefer Zipper to Make MAG 2!!!!!!!!

  • oh god think of the kidy mic spam oh god.

  • have you ever heard of MAG? its the same concept except 256 players

  • MY GOD, Gunns. Listen to me.

    The green screen effect is FUCKING UGLY. If you care about the presentation of your show you should get rid of it ASAP. Make your next vid, if you can, without the effect and ask the viewers if they like it bettter or not because I personally find it fucking atrocious.

  • Alright! Give me a AC-130!

  • wow no matter what system u have u will have lag with a full party imagine 1000 people what the fuck never would happen

  • Modded Battlefield 2: 64 vs 64 player(64 player map)

    Normal Battlefield: 32 vs 32(64 player map)

    Man vs Machine: 500 vs 500 O_O

  • Remember that ground breaking game playstation 3 had that there was like 200 people in the game at a time

    Neither do i

    This is a bad idea no matter what you think of it unless you have gigantic maps and a working player spawn with NO lag at all then don't consider it.

  • @sgammer69 it was 256 players. it held well the lag was barely noticable. it ws just a poorly executed game. MAG was a good concept had decent servers. just zipper interactive suck.

  • MAG was a pretty good concept but when i played lag was a issue for me and the spawns would either throw me 15 minutes away from the fight or in a position where i couldn't even move.

    I agree it was a good concept but the developers need to work on it before they release it.

    And mans vs machines had a lot of lag i mean as good as the servers are lag will always be there.

  • @sgammer69 thing about online gaming, its not ALL about the servers. you, yourself need to have a good internet connection, at the time i played MAG i was on a 50MB download and 15mb upload fibre optic connection. i never lagged in anygame and every single COD match from COD4 to MW2 i was hosting all matches. now that ive had to downgrade due to costs. im at 12mb down 1mb up, and the lag is unbelievable.

    so its about you own internet speeds aswell as the server.

  • Take a baby step! like it aint no thing....

  • at 2:00 mins in the video on kataku it seemed a little bit out of control and they were being spawn traped like crazy

  • The MMO idea sounds nice but wouldn't that make the battles WAYYYY too long?

  • soo... 900 campers, 50 quickscopers and 49 AFKs ? sweet

  • I can see it now Gunns General of the Army and his right hand men are Spiderbite, Meatwagon and Bentley and the first lady would be gunns gamer wife and everybody wanting to be in clan (NGT).

  • 100 years from now "IMAGINE, OVER 9000 PEOPLE STORMING THE CITY!"

  • It may sound like a great idea, but just remember how much people have complained since the beginning of online shooters, for me it was rainbow 6 back in 2004 about spawn camping. lets face it, the game would really be for "respawn entertainment" it's no longer skill at that point its pure luck. In war the elites hand back to send in fodder, and when the numbers dwindle they go in. This is pure respawning, no tactics, just pop random shots and pray you take 2-3 before you die.

  • The only way this would sell as well as COD or Battlefield is to have 60 frames per second. MAG was 30, it's just not enough anymore.

  • @TheFragger21 Battlefield have 30 fps

  • @RaginHutMonster on console yes, on PC no....

  • battle of Normandy would be insane 500vs500 with vehicles

  • MW3 1000 players= QUAD NADE EVERY 5 SECONDS?!!

  • @WORLDGAMINGCENTRAL hahahahaha. not funny