I thought it was just me out of tune as I was playing along until I saw the comments! I have an arrangement for clarinet, flute and bassoon, I play clarinet. In the version I have, there is a whole chunk missing (unless it's extra in this recording)! It does sound a little fast, I know I can;'t play this fast on my clarinet!
my favourite is the largo, i love this piece and am learning it at the moment. However, i thought that the Baroque period called for sharper, more distinctive playing (sort of like an accent) due to the large churches these pieces were performed in
It is D minor, but it sounds a half-step lower. In the Baroque Period the pitches were one half-step lower. I learned this when I took a youth orchestra to Boston's Handel & Haydn Society. The tour guide told us that the pitches were one-half step back then and for a piece to be performed authentically, the stringed instruments were tuned one-half step down (harpsichord, too) and the performers played on instruments from that period.
This is a concerto grosso, however you would more commonly name it as conerto for 2 violins and cello because that is what is involved via solo performances
Hi animeviolalord! Thanks for sharing! Great recording! I think we should all listen to authentic Baroque music! Early music performed in a modern way just doesn't have that "taste".
It's very nice...however, if I could beg some advice...?
I'm playing this for an audition piece (different arrangement, just a bit) and my teacher is telling me that the the beginning should be quite slow (becuase of the magestic marking) but all the recordings I've heard (including one from the group I'm auditioning into) have played the opening very fast.
Any help/commentary?
Much apprciated, and very nice playing--love the tone of the cello! I would have to lie to disown all jealosy.
@animeviolalord LOL. A440, A415, AXXX.... The key of H stumped me for a few minutes, too, though, I have to admit. Cheers and good luck. Thanks for the music!
@cadazar123 my friend that's because in the Baroque period the standard tuning note was G# instead of A, so that was one semitone lower than todays music. This was possibily because the gut strings couldn't hold too much tension. Therefore the "actual" pitch of the tonic here would be db :)
The quality of the actual audio is a bit distracting from the music, but this is one of my favorite Vivaldi pieces. I've got no complaints with the musicians, but the audio quality of the upload made the sound slur a bit. Took away from the great music.
that's how things were tuned back then for the most part. a lot of baroque ensembles these days play with this tuning for authenticity's sake.
i think it also serves to reduce the tension on string instruments, which results in a less bright and more warm sound, as was the case with the instruments of the day.
well, in the beginning, the pitch was lower. it got higher as music envolved. O_o like at my high school, we're usually playing with 440hz. But I start to play with 441hz Lol
xD i lke 442hz =] it stills a A but a little bit brighter, =] amm, but this audio is like a semiton like if were playing in 435hz xD or whatever.. well.. see ya.. =]
@Organiste06: Yes. This comment is to everyone in general. If you read the info, I clearly state that this group is using authentic performance practice. That means they [the English Concert] is using authentic instruments/replicas of 17th and 18th century instruments, authentic ancient music technique, and Baroque tuning (a'=415 in this case). Therefore, I shouldn't see anymore comments about this.
Amazing playing. I, however, do not agree with the allegros. In the baroque era (when Vivaldi composed) instruments were not made to, nor could possibly play this fast, that is new to modern day instruments. So i think Vivaldi probably would have had it in mind that it be played a little slower. But otherwise, this was fantastic.
@humphreyvivace: The instruments could indeed play this fast. This group is using authentic instruments. In fact, the two violin soloists are using actual 17th century instruments (one of the instruments is a model from Cremona, Italy, made in 1650). Although I also don't completely agree with the speed at which this piece is made, I do know that these instruments are capable of being played fluently at this speed.
@humphreyvivace He's right: they are playing on period instruments. Another thing to keep in mind when tempos were written down prior to exact notation was that terminology was relative. The biggest hint as to how something should be played by the tempo marking was style, not actually speed (though by extention speed did determine style).
I thought it was just me out of tune as I was playing along until I saw the comments! I have an arrangement for clarinet, flute and bassoon, I play clarinet. In the version I have, there is a whole chunk missing (unless it's extra in this recording)! It does sound a little fast, I know I can;'t play this fast on my clarinet!
BMG4ME 2 weeks ago
my favourite is the largo, i love this piece and am learning it at the moment. However, i thought that the Baroque period called for sharper, more distinctive playing (sort of like an accent) due to the large churches these pieces were performed in
ezio1da2firenze3 1 month ago
feel like a sir...
vladycrew 2 months ago
I'm playing the piece with my string quartet. Is there suppose to be a harpsichord accompaniment with the cello solo in the first movement?
YeeJian1 3 months ago
It is D minor, but it sounds a half-step lower. In the Baroque Period the pitches were one half-step lower. I learned this when I took a youth orchestra to Boston's Handel & Haydn Society. The tour guide told us that the pitches were one-half step back then and for a piece to be performed authentically, the stringed instruments were tuned one-half step down (harpsichord, too) and the performers played on instruments from that period.
DRob3Music 4 months ago 2
without harpsichord it would sound better
auripit 4 months ago
adoro musicas e compositores barrocos...linddooooo
thehobedes 5 months ago
I was Violin soloist for this Piece :D I played it like a beast :P LOVE THIS SONG!!!
natashaclapp93 6 months ago
@natashaclapp93 What song? I hear no voices?
muulka 1 month ago
Kwásný moc hezunký
Klarinenenka 7 months ago
i have actually met simon standage :P the performer - he is epic
BaboonBassoon 10 months ago
This is a concerto grosso, however you would more commonly name it as conerto for 2 violins and cello because that is what is involved via solo performances
BaboonBassoon 11 months ago
PERFECT tempo! The section between 1:48 and 2:08 is pretty much an auditory orgasm.
IndianTerp 11 months ago
This is beautifuly played. Nice interpretation indeed. Nevertheless I would like it a bit slower.
petrisz 1 year ago
Hi animeviolalord! Thanks for sharing! Great recording! I think we should all listen to authentic Baroque music! Early music performed in a modern way just doesn't have that "taste".
hezixiao 1 year ago
It's very nice...however, if I could beg some advice...?
I'm playing this for an audition piece (different arrangement, just a bit) and my teacher is telling me that the the beginning should be quite slow (becuase of the magestic marking) but all the recordings I've heard (including one from the group I'm auditioning into) have played the opening very fast.
Any help/commentary?
Much apprciated, and very nice playing--love the tone of the cello! I would have to lie to disown all jealosy.
cellokitty19 1 year ago
@cellokitty19: Sorry; I'm referring to the first movement. I quite like the fast pace, though.
cellokitty19 1 year ago
this is great.. but it's not in d minor, the pitch is weird
cadazar123 1 year ago
@cadazar123: *Sigh*.....read the comment I wrote when I replied to Organiste06...
animeviolalord 1 year ago 6
@animeviolalord LOL. A440, A415, AXXX.... The key of H stumped me for a few minutes, too, though, I have to admit. Cheers and good luck. Thanks for the music!
sosome57 11 months ago
@cadazar123 my friend that's because in the Baroque period the standard tuning note was G# instead of A, so that was one semitone lower than todays music. This was possibily because the gut strings couldn't hold too much tension. Therefore the "actual" pitch of the tonic here would be db :)
hezixiao 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@cadazar123 i agree , too fast and the pitch is weird, but still amazing !!!
venusworkshop 6 months ago
boah und des muss ich spielen-wollt ihr mich umbringen?!
RePtiLeFreAk018 1 year ago
Where is the first trill in Largo e Spiccato?
Demighoul 1 year ago
best evrsion on YT!
love the last movement :-)
StanEvalio 1 year ago
The quality of the actual audio is a bit distracting from the music, but this is one of my favorite Vivaldi pieces. I've got no complaints with the musicians, but the audio quality of the upload made the sound slur a bit. Took away from the great music.
Marvintherobot8 1 year ago
O_o why is it like a semiton lower?
TheCruelArtist 2 years ago
that's how things were tuned back then for the most part. a lot of baroque ensembles these days play with this tuning for authenticity's sake.
i think it also serves to reduce the tension on string instruments, which results in a less bright and more warm sound, as was the case with the instruments of the day.
reinux 2 years ago 9
haha yeh. logic.
TheCruelArtist 2 years ago
it's just a different tuning, usually used for baroque music,,
aviya43 2 years ago
lol the pitch back then was around 415 and is around 440 now, so it sounded a semitone lower. ^^''
TheCruelArtist 2 years ago
yeah, why?? :S
MoisesTerrazasTV 1 year ago
well, in the beginning, the pitch was lower. it got higher as music envolved. O_o like at my high school, we're usually playing with 440hz. But I start to play with 441hz Lol
TheCruelArtist 1 year ago
xD i lke 442hz =] it stills a A but a little bit brighter, =] amm, but this audio is like a semiton like if were playing in 435hz xD or whatever.. well.. see ya.. =]
MoisesTerrazasTV 1 year ago
Must be period instruments.
Organiste06 1 year ago
@Organiste06: Yes. This comment is to everyone in general. If you read the info, I clearly state that this group is using authentic performance practice. That means they [the English Concert] is using authentic instruments/replicas of 17th and 18th century instruments, authentic ancient music technique, and Baroque tuning (a'=415 in this case). Therefore, I shouldn't see anymore comments about this.
animeviolalord 1 year ago 2
I'm playing this with a good friend of mine :3
I love it ='D
ZaraTwilightSaga 2 years ago
Amazing playing. I, however, do not agree with the allegros. In the baroque era (when Vivaldi composed) instruments were not made to, nor could possibly play this fast, that is new to modern day instruments. So i think Vivaldi probably would have had it in mind that it be played a little slower. But otherwise, this was fantastic.
humphreyvivace 2 years ago
@humphreyvivace: The instruments could indeed play this fast. This group is using authentic instruments. In fact, the two violin soloists are using actual 17th century instruments (one of the instruments is a model from Cremona, Italy, made in 1650). Although I also don't completely agree with the speed at which this piece is made, I do know that these instruments are capable of being played fluently at this speed.
animeviolalord 1 year ago 22
@animeviolalord thank you for correcting my mistake. that is ust what i had been taught. I love to learn new things, so again, thank you
humphreyvivace 1 year ago
@animeviolalord
I think the tempo here let well showing the harmony line and contrasts,so is well interpreteted...!!
poicpi
82224561 10 months ago
@humphreyvivace He's right: they are playing on period instruments. Another thing to keep in mind when tempos were written down prior to exact notation was that terminology was relative. The biggest hint as to how something should be played by the tempo marking was style, not actually speed (though by extention speed did determine style).
perfectstrings 1 year ago
@perfectstrings Until you get to the Romantic Era where Chopin said Screw this Shit!
TheWoodyNation 6 months ago
@humphreyvivace i think it sound better in allegro. it might even sound better in vivace, like summer.
gpensky 11 months ago
I love all versions of this.
ifrit1780 2 years ago
bravooooooo ¡¡¡
mitoorealidades 2 years ago
actually could you guys identify this song at :03- :30
Wingzero5555 2 years ago
@Wingzero5555 The marking at :03-:30 in "Allegro". On iTunes, this will probably be listed as Concerto in D-Minor Op. 3 No. 11. See if that works.
animeviolalord 2 years ago
mm would anyone be able to type out how Itunes would list this specific song
Wingzero5555 2 years ago
Played with a fantastic energy and with
a spasmic buoyancy well suited for the
piece. Best interpretation..ever.
dnair9 2 years ago
I agree with you. I've yet to hear an interpretation better than Trevor Pinnock's.
animeviolalord 2 years ago
awesome
didiistheman 2 years ago
Maravillosa interpretación.El mejor "prette rosso".Divino barroco.
paradoxicus 2 years ago