SUKHOI Su-37 extreme maneuvers & Supermaneuverability!!!

[perpil1]

good

[SlavaKraynov]

готовьте деревянные бушлаты долбанные америкосы

[beaggyboy]

UAC Sukhoi!!,show us this similar super-aircraft maneuvering with some 6,if not 8 AAMs on-board:- 2 x R-73 plus 4 x R-77.While Su-30/35/37 is more agile unarmed, I now suspect F-22 could perform better,owing to internal type weapons storage.Omitting away weapons' parasitic aerodynamic interference. Still the two western European newest isnt anywhere near this, be they agility or payload,except for the availabilty of substantial weapons hardpoints.Su needs to address this shortcoming

[yellowmustang71]

does anyone know a name for this kind of music? (ie the female vocals' style)

[odzadze123]

@yellowmustang71

Music genre is Trance.

The Female vocal is Kelly Scollard (aka Kelly & Lee),and Song is insipired with work of Miriam Stockley British singer.Stockley was born in Johannesburg,South Africa, and her work is influenced by the music in her home country.

Her unique vocalese style gained international acclaim when Karl Jenkins' launched the "Adiemus" project with "Songs of Sanctuary".version with Miriam Stockley..

Atlantis vs Avatar - Fiji (Lange Remix).

watch?v=EnxXnM5__rc

[yellowmustang71]

wow. EPIC! its like the plane is a puppet and someone's pulling the strings. Make it dance baby. make it dance

[prjerry7]

this plane is very unstable and not practicle for combat but it is for airshow. One reason why it never went under production.

[Viruner]

@prjerry7 I have bad news for you, su-35BM which is in production right now have even best maneuverability then su-37...

[mvuchev]

@prjerry7 pjahahahaha dumb-ass :D ROFL SU 37 will pwn f22 raptor... Its the most maneuverable plane ever! And you all are keep saying that F22 is the best, but what about the NEW SU ? T-50 ?? Why did the USAF declined to do a dogfight (lock only) with T-50 ?? ROFL USA airplanes suck... Computers made them, and Russians do it with hard work and love.

[mihalisvlahos]

(Very nice music!!!) Russian aircraft -russian philosophy: High technology , simple to use

Greece

[Nephthalem]

The SU-37 is a beautiful aircraft and these maneuvers look good to an air show audience, but they can only be performed without any armament and an almost empty fuel tank. In combat, the added weight of the armament would prohibit such maneuvers.

[Viruner]

@Nephthalem You wrong, even super-cobra easily did on su-27 with full tanks and full weapon equipment. Su-37 & su-35 are lighter and have powerful engines, so they can do all this maneveours with full equipment.

[Nephthalem]

@Viruner I stand corrected.

[razielakuma]

See "Discovery - F22 vs SU-37" SU-37 God The Sky!

[frankthesasquatch]

this is AWESOME!!! and stop the fighting between us and russia, we havent got in a war and we probably never will its annoying

[AHarmlessBlkGuy]

Sukhoi is THE BEST!!!

[1bearcatf8f]

Im an American I love airplanes,When I see a good airplane I have to like it.The Sukhoi's are a very nice family of aircraft,But I dont think they will have the kill ratio of the F-15.Every airplane is good in there own ways!

[mshigorin]

@1bearcatf8f we in Russia don't like to kill, you see, but we don't like our land occupied and "democratically" ripped even more. Guess those sane folks who keep their own eyes open know why.

[hall01000]

sry becose of my bad english (i am german) but i realy miss the mig 35

[gabriel6741]

SU T 50 PAK FA FOREVER....

[APRINCESSTALE]

may not be the best, but if they have done to inspire writers of science fiction and comic. These technological wonders are aesthetically superior to shit like the F-22 or F-35 .. scrap billions.

[sadekgheidan]

@APRINCESSTALE Sure those maneuvers are very beautiful, but in combat, cute little maneuvers like that don't do much to save your ass. I've got a lot of respect for the Su-37 and her designers- I absolutely love the "Terminator", but unlike you, I'm not in the illusion that it would be much of a competition for an F-22 Raptor. Some aircraft do stuff like this that look really awesome while others are built for mission-survivability and combat-effectiveness (Like the F22, Typhoon, PAK-FA etc.).

[Ouija121085]

@TheTequilaShooter what you fail to mention is that those planes were from 1970 with 1970's avionics and engines, while F15's had modern upgraded aviuonics PLUS AIR SUPERIORITY and i wont mention the exprience of pilots. we have never seen MiG29 and F15 from russia and america engage i bet the results would go into russian favour.

[TheTequilaShooter]

@Ouija121085 [i bet the results would go into russian favour.] I bet you're wrong. Most of Russia's planes are outdated. They have very few Su30 MKI's or 35's. When you look at the number of hours American fighters pilots recieve, plus the fact that most US planes have far superior avionic packages, have been kept up to date, and a much stronger support system, and higher inventory of aircraft, the Russians would be decimated.

[TheTequilaShooter]

Sorry about the vulgarity & confrontational text in my prior post. I should have it it at a more professional level instead.

[TheTequilaShooter]

I just saw the video you referenced. It's not entirely accurate. For one, it wasn't hundreds of planes against one. You'll never see hundreds of planes all engaging the same fighter. The US flies its fighters in groups of four, and then breaks them down further to groups of two, if necessary. In addition, & as I mentioned earlier, not all kills by US aircraft were at BVR. A couple kills were at WVR, both at night.

[a6km]

this is just breath taking nothing else so shut up about stupid dog fight comments and sit back and enjoy the best acrobatics by far

[HALDUNTARGAN]

What for are all these tricks? If Raptor has had volleyed an Radar Guided AIM 120 or similar one,whould Su stay in life?Without stealth what is the usage of this?

[a6km]

@HALDUNTARGAN having fun ?

[Mobius0487]

In Soviet Russia, planes do back-flips in the air.

[NickyH55]

keep in mind that these maneuvers are at low altitude and low speed and in most cases are a matter of pure ballistics, in a dog fight these maneuvers are much harder to do cus u r going so much faster, its a great plane but dont make the mistake that just cus it can do a crazy cool looking flip makes this the best plane ever or way better that a F15SG or future SE, F18 Block II or Block III, or F16 IN or Block 60 also Sukohis are notoriously hard to fly

[childrenofbodomfan74]

@NickyH55 lol from what ive read the su 30 mk 2 has a 89% sucess rate in dogfights against f15s...

[NickyH55]

@childrenofbodomfan74

they F15 has never lost in god fight. if u c an show me were u read this i'd have an easier time believing u

[odzadze123]

@NickyH55

I remember that in Belgrade Aviation Museum (Serbia),is displayed as an exhibit

"LANTIRN" AN/AAQ-14 targeting pod from F-15E,captured in 1999 war in Serbia?

Question is where they Obitain such piece of equipment?

In "1982 Lebanon War" Syrian and Soviet press,claimed that Syrian Mig-23ML fighters knock down

2x Israeli F-15s with R-23 missiles and 3 more F-15s with R-24 missiles.Also they present evidences for 5x F16 and 3x F-4.

Of course IAF negate that claims as they Usualy do ;)

[odzadze123]

And remember this is from the time before AIM-120 AMRAAM,where only AIM-7 SPARROW is used.And in that time R-24R have better capabilities than AIM-7M and F used by Israelis.

Also Syrian Airforce have Serious Loses,4x Mig-23MF ,8x Mig-23MS (with radar from Mig-21),

14x Mig-23BN Attacker,37x Mig-21

Reason For heavy Syrian Losses is fact that Israel have RC-135 Jamming platform and Hawkeye AWACS which is Downed by Syrian S-200 SAM in 1983. Also IAF have airsuperiority (115x F-15 vs 24 x Mig-23Mf).

[TheTequilaShooter]

@odzadze123 The exhibit in Serbia displays portions of the downed F-117. I've seen it here on the W W W. Never has there been any evidence of a F-15 or 16 shot down in Serbia or in Syria. After the Syrians claimed to have shot down the F-15 Israel said it wasn't true, and Syria was never able to back it up with proof. No gun footage photos, and no crash site evidence. If there were evidence you would find a link to it here on the W W W, but it is no where to be seen.

[odzadze123]

@TheTequilaShooter

I see those evidences in serbian general staff,PVO command (Air defence forces) in part of Belgrade called Banjica,Street Neznanog Junaka...

p.s. i worked into S-125M Neva-M air defence missile system,

F1/F2 Axis operator for final missile guidance:)

For Museum,i think that Today still is in Static Display,remains of F-16CG...

Also parts of one LANTIRN Pod p.s. I saw with my own eyes two different!

....i will send to you some Web adress,so you can see evidences too.

[TheTequilaShooter]

@odzadze123 The LANTIRN Pod is easily detachable from the aircraft, and is not evidence that a F-15 was shot down. Real evidence would be like that of the F-117, where they show the canopy and other parts of the airplane. The only other aircraft shot down in Serbia was one F-16 by a SAM, and there's even a video here on YT that has the audio recording of the pilots when they were trying to evade the missiles. It's pretty intense.

[odzadze123]

@TheTequilaShooter

but first you must to enable option for your channel to be Available ;)

For Syrian vs Israel war,Syrians claimied that they send Data to Israel,but Israel Denied such statement?

So who will know,Soviet press and Later Russian,also newspapers from Ukraine also Publised same List with Israel air to air Losses?

when Aircraft is Hit at High speeds or at High Altitude,violent uncontroled decompression occur and literally break up the plane to pieces and disperse over a large area.

[TheTequilaShooter]

@odzadze123 If F-15's were actually shot down by Syrian forces you would see wreckage of the aircraft or at least gun footage of it being shot down. Syria has never produced such evidence. At least in Serbia, you have both the F-117 and 16 wreckage, which the US admits were shot down. Who cares if the Soviet press announced the kills in Syria. That doesn't mean its true. The Soviets had lots of propaganda, and were embarassed by their aircraft's losses. Bottom line, no pictures,

[TheTequilaShooter]

no gun footage, no evidence, and no F-15 or 16's shot down by MIGs. 

[TheTequilaShooter]

You can post weblinks here on the comments page. Just put a space after each dot.

[odzadze123]

@TheTequilaShooter

I can't post links becouse there are to many of them.

Of course Migs over Serbia aren't shoot down any F-15 or F-16 becouse their radars NO19 aren't operative,in fact after purchasing them in 1986,last date for required complete overhaul is set for the year 1994.In 1999 Whole fleet are in very Poor Condition,and NATO generals know that.

Of the 14 aircraft none of them has had the operative radar and others are plagued with Hidraulics problems.

[TheTequilaShooter]

@odzadze123 Then why did the Mig 29's go and engage the F-15's if their radar was inoperable? Makes no sense.

[odzadze123]

@TheTequilaShooter

Have you ever heard for the word "patriotism".

Becouse those Pilots are Heroes,they Loved their Country,nation and they Know that they are right.

They know Who are Albanians on Kosovo,and what is real situation on the ground.

In that time the Truth have hard time to make its way to the world media because CNN and similar

TV stations have their propaganda and you could only hear one version, the same situation is twith Libya.Osama buried in Ocean LOL :P

watch?v=7Y7cujSiqW4

[odzadze123]

@odzadze123

9/11 is inside Job and every person on tis planet which use his Brain,know that..

So i think that this event is appropriate reason which shows us that we can not trust them!

p.s.

Complete serial,with testemonies of surviving Pilots,colegues are here

watch?v=F--hrHOcwOo , but unfortunately this serial don't have translation into English.

only 4 available Mig-29s, with partially operational radars are sent and rest of story you know.

yes,in one of them,radar died in flight.

[Ouija121085]

@TheTequilaShooter Because they had the balls to do so. its called honor.

[odzadze123]

@TheTequilaShooter

technically the most valid planes are taking off (4 of them) guided by the radar surveillance services (VOJIN), and attempted to use IR sensor, with short-range missiles (R-73E) to intercept aerial targets,But you know what are their chances were against 500+ Aircrafts of NATO armed with AIM-120 Medium range missiles,and Covered by AWACS!

To be honest those Mig's armed with Export and Obsolete R-27R,and that they were technically valid,

would not be a threat to NATO aircraft.

[Allanvh5150]

@NickyH55 The ones I have flown didnt seem hard to fly.....

[Ouija121085]

@NickyH55 SU27 is easy to fly... its a masterpeice of an aircraft and its made to be the best. Due to the acrobatics and extreme manuvers it can make pilots would need more training to be able to utilise them, comparing it to normal flying and standard practice.

[everythingman987]

if they combine the preformance of this with the stealth and weapon systems of the raptor...... you would get the ULTIMATE FIGHTER!!!!

[Mifodiy35]

@everythingman987

Yep that's why i say Israel should buy Russian fighters :)

[thedarkembassy]

@everythingman987

according to your definition, ULTIMATE FIGHTER!!!! == Su PAK FA :D

[everythingman987]

@thedarkembassy it dosen't have the computer power of the f22 :)

[thedarkembassy]

@everythingman987

Geeks everywhere in the states rejoiced after reading that statement :D

[everythingman987]

@thedarkembassy yeah, but in russia, they don't have computers, so they couln't read my comment ;)

[thedarkembassy]

@everythingman987

That's just cruel man. Russians could tear the intestines out of bears and make a computer out of it... Insane amounts of awesomeness there dude..

[soricbojan]

@everythingman987

you are so uninformed and miserable

[soricbojan]

@everythingman987

you are so uninformed and miserable

[everythingman987]

@soricbojan like your penis..........oh wait, you don'thave one

[johnsclouds]

The argument here have seem to strayed off from facts a little. If in fact th facts everyone quoted are correct and the supposed missiles have a max target g of 6 and 9. That is enough to shoot down almost any fighters. Some pilots have been documented to be able to take a 9 g turn with a g suit with the aid of a g suit without a impairing vision compromise. however, th majority of pilots will nt be able to evade a missile with a 9g turn and continue to operate the aircraft.

[svinche2]

@gypsykingg

R-73 is One of MOST Manuverable Short range Missiles.

(Not least as You wrote)

Old AIM-9P is Least maneuverable Missile,for sure :)

[gypsykingg]

@odzadze123 The first form of helmet aiming systems was used on f-14's and 15's in 1974 (VTAS). The most advanced form of HMC's is the one used on the f-35 wich is the first tactical fighter devolped without a HUD. It uses HMDS which displayes all cockpit information and exterior imagery day or night in any direction the pilot looks with EOTS eliminating the jet all together from the pilots perspective, which is the most advanced HMC to date.

[odzadze123]

@gypsykingg

But VTAS can Aim only in One Direction,straight away.

With Shchel-3UM Pilot can to Aim in All directions,and Angle Limits is not Limited by angular ranges of NO19 Radar.

Not,Information is Picked up by Whole Avonic Sensors (Like IR),this Aiming Helmet pilot can Provide all needed Data for R-73E (IR) seeker.

Even if the target is Not Tracked By NO19 Radar.

For F-35 HDMS i am well informed.

I saw Russian Counterpart designs on the web.They like HDMS for F-35,are still in Development.

[gypsykingg]

@odzadze123 To target the target may not be limited to the angle of engagement, but the missile may be. Now I'm not familiar with russian air-to-air missiles, so I'm not sure. But the ASRAAM was just replaced with a new air-to-air missile that can intercept from nealy any angle of engagement in close range dog fights.

[odzadze123]

@gypsykingg

Hm..Read something about R-73E,It's Still best and most Maneuverable Short range Air to Air missile.

With Amazingly Sensitive IR head,mock dogfights have indicated the high degree of "off-boresight" capability of the R-73 seeker angle (to 60° off-boresight).Derivative called R-74M (40Km range) can be Launch Backward.

This missile posses one Unique Feature.it can be reversed on its axis,when is Launched.

this be performed just Slightly before Rocket Engines are started .

[gypsykingg]

@odzadze123 I don't believe so. The AIM-9x is perhaps the most maneuverable intercept missile. It uses thrust vectoring and has short and medium range capabilities. It can track a target no matter its position, as long as it's within range.

[odzadze123]

@gypsykingg

We are actually kind of late to the party on this one though.

The R-73 (AA-11 Archer) has had these kinds of capabilities for years.

R-73E are First Short range missile with Thrust Vectoring propulsion Sistem,

Both AIM-9X and R-73M2 have 2.5 Mach speed and Ranges of About 40Km

Only Aerodinamicaly Scheme of R-73 design are Far better in terms of High Velocity maneuvers.

R-73 Can intercept 12G targets.,AIM-9X only 9G targets.

For AIM-9X Seeker Raytheon claims (90 off-boresigh)

[odzadze123]

@odzadze123

And Russians Curently Developed and Tested their Improved Seekers in Vympel NPO Bureau.

But to be Honest,Old one are Also Great.

Even Oldest version,R-73E have great Capabilities,and Producer claims are Proven in USAF evaluation and conducted testings.

[gypsykingg]

@odzadze123 The AIM demonstrates a 60g turn capability, no modern day aircraft can out turn either of these missiles.

[odzadze123]

@gypsykingg

You Dont Understand,I Don't Talk about Max G force of Missiile?

I Talked about what is max G Load of Target,that Missile is chasing.

Missile always have to suffer a higher G force than Target (Several Times more than Target)

In other hand Missile will Never be able to perform Target Interception.

for AIM-9x Max target G Load is 9G.

And for R-73 Max Target G Load is 12G.

and then imagine how much G force produces R-73 Missile Itself.

[gypsykingg]

@odzadze123 That makes no sense. No aircraft is able to out turn a missile no matter if you were pulling 12 g's, though no aircraft/pilot could sustain a turn like that. After reading about that missile it is one of the least manuverable of modern AIM and only having 60 degree obs, also hurts its ability. the trust vectoring system on it is a simple designe that lags behind the design of the 9x and it is 125 kg, which it will bleed of speed a lot quicker than other AIM when the rockets go out

[odzadze123]

@gypsykingg Flight Physics tell us...

Missiles Must to Suffer several Times Greater G Load,in Turns if he want to Catch a Highly Maneuverable target.

R-73 is Almost 30+ Year Old Design,and Yes is Simple But Highly Efficient and Cheap,in fact Whole structure is Designed with Aimed Simplicity.Materials used for Production are Cheap and Less "Modern",if we Look in Newest designs.Absence of Composite Materials took its toll.But if we Look How much R-73 Cost,we will see that is BRAZENLY CHEAP.

[odzadze123]

@gypsykingg

For IR seeker,yes AIM-9x have Newly developed Design,and Raytheon claims that have

(to 90° off-boresight).

So R-73 IR seeker are less capable,but before 30+ years it's Best design,and only IR head that Suprased it today are one from AIM-9X.Russians Already tests their 90 off-boresight design.

Also Thrust vectoring Design in AIM-9x are more Complexed,more expensive sistem for Maintenance.

Missile Aerodinamycs Limited benefits of this sistem and in general can sustain Only 9G Target.

[johnsclouds]

@gypsykingg 60g? That's not what i learned in flight school...

[Drakki100]

:O no way xD

[srgan92]

Yeah SUKHOIS are the best in the world.SUKHOI forever!!!:)

[warriorxp111]

great vid

[tornedo623]

f-22 can hold 60* aoa for unlimited time....mig29ovt can do some crazy manueveres too..i dont think it is the most manueverable ac

[ebincelos]

So according to you F-22 is the most maneuverable...

[blackpaladinking]

@ebincelos haaha

[tornedo623]

@ebincelos ya f22 is the most battle effective manueverable..

[MagnesiumAlloy]

@tornedo623 Huh what? no.. su-37 is more maneuverable than the F-22...

[gypsykingg]

@MagnesiumAlloy thats true but the f-22 doesn't need to turn to shoot down an opponent. The F-22's pilots use the JHMCS (joint helmet-mounted cueing system) eleminating the need to point the nose of the aircraft at the enemy. All the pilot has to do is turn his head, lock on and shoot. So while these planes are doing these crazy aerobatics to try to get a lock, they will be shot down before they know it. Thats if they manage to get into visual range before being shot down.

[MagnesiumAlloy]

@gypsykingg I'm sure the Russians have the same technology.. they have a similar radar system as the F-22.. one that scans vertically and horizontally and can pick up tragets automatically.. Im not too sure about the range but it can fix onto stealthed targets from 60KM away. Also the Russians didnt make this to counter the F-22.. this aircraft was a test platform only to see what technologies to implement into the new su-35. Russias answer to the F-22 is the T-50. Also look Russian AESA

[maxispeed0]

Good video

SU-37 was not produced already. To replace the SU-35 (BM)

SU-30MK2, SU-35 (BM), MIG-29OVT

The most maneuverable aircraft in the world.

Perhaps the T-50 PAK FA will be even better maneuver.

[ebincelos]

I think Su-37 are already in production under the name Su-30 MKI. Isn't the MKI a modified version Su-37???

[maxispeed0]

No

Technology SU-37 used in the SU-35 (BM)

and SU-30MK2

[ZeljkoKG87]

@ebincelos Nope, It's a redesigned Su-27, developed due to the partnership of Russia, India and Israel. Russian avionics,Indian displays and instruments, very advanced aircraft :)

[TacairStationHQ]

Artistic compilation. Well done.  Superb a/c indeed.

[su27forserbia]

Sukhoi-s are the Best !!!