Added: 1 year ago
From: St37One
Views: 2,718
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (48)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • what a wonderfully smart and enlightened woman

  • It starts by excepting Misandary awareness!!!!

  • A real woman.

  • Well, we all know for a fact that, in relationships, women physically attack men at an exponentially higher rate than vice-versa. It is, however, not a social taboo.

  • Now there's a True Woman!! 

  • She has just reiterated what MRAs have been saying for years...Domestic violence is a violence issue, not a gender issue.

  • @j0einc0gnit0

    Which is what her friend Erin Pizzey has always said, It it is what the general public would naturally conclude, if they took at least some time to think about it objectively.

    But many people are mislead by half truths, and deliberate bias, so they take it for granted that it is a gender issue, since that it how it is packaged/presented, and that is what the "experts" say afterall.

    This is a positive sign because a senator is taking what was once a suicidal position.

  • When a woman goes to court & says, I need 1500 per mo. so children & I can live like we are accustomed too. Judge says, ok but law changed yesterday. I have lottery drum w/3 white balls for women & 3 blue (usually are) balls for men. He turns tumbler & blue ball falls out. Sorry, your husb gets the kids & you have to pay 1500 per mo. She replies, I only make 2500 per mo. He says, get use to it, men have for fifty yrs. I just cut divorce rate in half over night. Best interests of kids, right??

  • @MLJ1219

    If we had a sex blind family court and justice system, then we would have very few divorces, and many more marriages. The frequent injustice and absurdity that we see would dissapear out of necessity if women were as likely to be victimized by the system as men are. But out of necessity, that is not how it is. The system could not be maintained if it had to operate in a sex blind fashion.

  • @St37One That is what I was trying to say but you said it much more eloquently. Feminists on every site say they just want equality but if you ask them to openly support a lottery (what could be more fair) for custody/support they run screaming into the hills. Don't even ask them about unconstitutional selective prosecution of males or primary aggressor laws (profiling). U can't be a fem & talk about equality, that is like kkk mem saying I'm not racist I just like the pointed hoods they wear.

  • @St37One Thank you for posting this powerful vid, this really puts a sock in the mouth of fems. This vid has been used to refute fem arguments on a vid, I Am a Woman Against Feminism on YT just yesterday. Pls come over and join the lively debate. BTW, have u heard of any men's activist or fem promoting a lottery system (legislative) for custody/support? You've stated why fems wouldn't support it but have you heard it brought up before by men or women?

  • shes a senator in canada? finally a logical female in a position of power.. hillary could learn a thing or two from her

  • @themaniusedtob Hey, Barbra Boxer is cool.

  • @Jonstern1983 oh, I dont know who she is *shrugs... what are her principles on mens issues?

  • @themaniusedtob I'm not sure what you mean by "Men's Issues."

  • @Jonstern1983 I mean, if she (Barbara boxer) has ever stood-up for inequalities faced by men? Such as this wonderful lady (Ann Cools) who has brought at-least small media attention to the fact that males are not inherently more violent etc she addressed the misconception gracefully by saying that violence between men & women is equal, that men get persecuted more frequently based on gender alone etc.

    Has this Barbara Boxer done anything similar for these issues that are faced by men?

  • @themaniusedtob Unless you count opposing the war in Iraq then, no, but I don't remember any laws, or cases like this being brought to the US Senate within her tenure as senator... considering her views on human right... oh, wait, she did mention in the Al Franken Anti-rape bill that it would be handled the exact same way regardless of the rapists gender.

  • @Jonstern1983 Interesting... I sure do like the "regardless of the rapists gender" bit... Does sound like it could do some good as long as she isnt going to push for a new definition of rape that would land more men in jail like "whistling rape" or the "rape stare" lol but yeah, I will check her out, thanks for letting me know.

  • I see more and more feminist crossing over to the side of men but I don`t see anyone on our side crossing over to the side of feminism. Must mean that our side is right.

  • @1WhoSeeks I agree, I also find (beside some obious misogyne elements) our side much more open to debate and honest discussion. While on on the other side to many emo's and deniers. Go to the feminist blogsphere and look for u'rself...it's more like a fanatic church. Debates with mra and fems looks more atheist's vs christians. Little reasoning and tons of insults. No wonder smart women chose to leave....

  • @Kenshiroit A fanatical church says it all in a nutshell. Funny thing about emos is, they love getting on the internet and waving the feminist flag but in person, they never raise to a debate.

  • @1WhoSeeks exactly they never do. They just jump in show their disapruval and then they move away. To be fair some MRA also do the same, but the phenomena is more prevalent between the fems. About my sourches go to every fem blog and look. There is a x feminist QuietRiotGirl who even has open a blog on the issue. The best and most articulate feminist debaters ironically are the male feminist, but they arent essent from antimale garbage. But at least they debate. The others rarely

  • Conjoint is the word she is looking for. Conjoint by definition implies there is a mutual problem to be solved, with mutual responsibility.

  • She looks like satan in this clip. The title of this clip is feminism trying to disarm the proof about the abuse of men in the west. This is a general technique of Feminists and the elite. Its to not have the debate, to not expose the abuses they have been performing on men and children for decades. It is very subtle/reptilian abuse. It directly trys to reach out to men to exploit mans mammalian social higher brain by using emotional Limbic responses. BE AWARE. FIGHT MISANDRY IN THE WEST.

  • @icthruu4evr

    well, I can hear it perfectly with no difficulty.

    Some people will need to adjust thier audio to the left speaker, but if both speakers are working

    then the audio works fine.

  • @icthruu4evr

    I cant do anything about the audio quality.

    but the content is priceless.

  • Wow! Ann Cools! That's the first I ever heard a female politician speaking up about equality in the issue of DV and pointing out the hate-mongering and trampling of men's rights and denial and neglect of their health and safety.

    Now this is the kind of enlightened woman I would like to see run for Prime Minister.

  • @unfortunatebeam Lets hope it sets a precedent.

  • Senator Ann Cools was a radical feminist. That is how she came to be a senator. Then she had a gradual change or heart and became a Men's Rights Advocate (MRA).  She now advocates for men to be given the same rights as women have.

    Her feminist friends now hate her, but she has new friends.

  • @proudguy Sweet! She's seen the light....kind of reminds me of old Warren Farrell.

  • equality is impossible. women will never think like men, but men will think like women. gender biased leans too far in favor of women.

  • @Z4N30 sure equality is possible. we just have to remember that women and men should compliment each other, and to stop competing.

  • @Z4N30 I don't think that's true

  • False abuse allegation by women to gain advantages from Residency in a country, greed, sympathy, advantage in the so-called "Family Court", free assistances, excuses, revenge and so forth is at least 95% of abuse allegations. Men are raised at childhood to never hit a girl or sister, but girls are encouraged to hit boys and more so when they are adults. Men always would risk their lives to save stranger women and children which is their nature. Most men are role models generous, inventors loving

  • Thank you Senator Ann Cools for wonderfully speaking out and voicing a genuine concern regarding the Domestic Violence industry's double standards, as well as only protecting one side of victims. I truly appreciate you. I have been praying for people like yourself.

  • wimyn's "shelters" are more like covens for misandrist queer wimyn living of f of the public purse and promoting lesbianism - God help naive wimyn that go to such 'shelters" for succor

  • @sccrow72 That explains it, my left speaker does not work. Thank you sir.

  • Hmmm the audio is not working?

  • @Red0660

    it is not very good quality.

  • I thought Canada was at the arse-end of equal rights.

    How did she get into government? (Not that I'm complaining, I hope she makes PM)

  • @sirskeptic Canada is where Ann Cools is needed most. It is her experiences in Canada that have given her the idea that something is horribly wrong, and needs to change.

  • Isn't that your ex-girlfriend man? JK cool clip though.

  • @pinegrove33

    Usually I get your jokes.

    But that one just has me shaking my head.

    I appreciate your input though.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more