Added: 5 months ago
From: Motorweek
Views: 39,399
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (155)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I wish in the next Mustang had a Hatchback like a 2012 Jaguar XKR.

  • ur right 124mph is a 10s car  Brenspeed 2012 Edelbrock E-Force Supercharged Mustang Runs 10's

  • Ummm, they're MPH reader was way off. As great as the car is, it's not a 124MPH car (stock).

  • 12.4 at 124.....goddamn

  • Love this car and I would buy one, but was wondering if it is going to come in black, not counting a laguna seca... does anyone know? Did they offer black back then?

  • Its quartermile is 121 mph.

  • Wait doesn't the Boss have launch control? Is it just the Laguna Seca??

  • 2:14-2:17 biggggggggggggg dent in that resonator.

  • 124 mph in the quarter????????Never in a million years ,more like 114 max!Thats a mistake they should correct right away.

  • @camirocz They also mentioned they obtained those performance figures on Regular not Premium. They also did it without TracKey and the exhaust baffles removed.

  • Hagerty's has said the new Boss 302 is going to be a collectible in some years' time. I believe 'em. Very rad car,

  • i own a 5.0 GT but these 4.4 0-60 numbers are piss poor for 444 hp car. they need to get rid of the 373 gears and 285 rear tire and maybe go with 355 gears and 305 rear tires then maybe you can make use of all this wasted power out of the hole. base vett has 342 gears and 426 hp with dual mode exhaust and it does better 0-60 times. vett costs quite a bit less also than the 302 boss

  • @rickstarks ..The times here are not the Boss 302 best and has run 4.0 sec or better to 60 mph. The Corvette weight is also significantly lower.

  • NICE CAR!

  • i dont get thumbs up with my boss, i get bitches =)

  • I'm a chevy guy but I would take this car over the Camaro anyday

  • @EFK1993 i agree with you

  • does this guy ever age

  • other places got 0-60 in 4.0 and 1/4 mile was alot faster

  • @daniel0771 They ran it on regular gas as stated in the video. The knock sensor kicks in and backs off the timing dropping the power; hence, lower track times.

  • @twinimaging well thank you. i did not know that

  • @daniel0771 motortrend got those number so when an argument come about i use motortrends numbers

  • they must have added a 150 shot to get trap times that fast 124 come on what the hell is he smoking

  • @socleanmx6 I'm pretty sure a 150 shot would do better than that you dumb ass. this monster has freaking amazing suspension with launch control and 444 hp to get it there fast. thats what you get in a modern mustang. get with it!!!

  • @socleanmx6 exactly....124 in their dreams more like 114 maximum all stock.

  • how is this nostalgia? only thing nostalgic about it is the freakin' stickers :/

  • @59summerset

    Win

  • "An interior with modern convinces." *Puts Large Soda in Cup Holder*

  • The only thing I think could be better would be to get rid of the electronic assist steering. Good old direct mechanical pump might give more feedback, but then again, they got everything right that i could tell, and the steering had good-enough feel....but I gotta wonder.... :)

  • Not bad, 3 out of 100 guys drives Camaros

  • @goldenxwarrior It know five and those 2 have v6s

  • way to go Ford. GM could learn from this.

  • @XxCrazedEvolutionXx man you must be a fucking troll.. I dont need to prove to you what i have, but i will anyways.. I have a 2012 boss 302 in race red, its number 889 and i bought it ride outside of destin florida and i drove it home to where i live in new orleans.. Paid 50k after taxes for it

  • @svt89 this car is faster than all the gt500s besides the 2013 to a certain point... Any 1/4 mile race abd road coarse race, this car will win but on a roling start this car might pull infront the boss... Ive raced a stock 2007 gt500 in my boss and i got him by 2 cars, from a dig

  • @dtdeb99 Bull Shit yur just a YouTube Dreamer keep thinking you have one..

  • how is this car faster than the shelby gt 500 ......ford screwd up a little

  • @1IImrxII1 no they didnt, they made it as a race car for the street. the shelby is just a ton of power without any traction. but dont get me wrong i love the shelby too

  • @1IImrxII1 Its not faster than a gt500 no 5.0 is.Most 5.0s run 107-112mph a shelby with a good driver traps 115-124mph big differnce.

  • awesome ....sucks that they took fog lights of the were actually usefull

  • 124?..if so..THIS particular Stang, w/ proper setup would be well into the 11's

  • It was made to beat the BMW M3 not the Camaro the stock gt does that.

  • was that a review or a commercial.

  • I've never like a car more than I like this one - only in a different way. For the money, there's not a car I'd rather have.

  • 124 mph teap speed at the end o the quarter mile? There must be something wrong

  • @13sfaustino 110 for reg 5.0 i think they meant 114 mph for 302, 124 this car would be running circles around GTR

  • no way this one is still new

    it took 3.9 seonds with normal key as 0 - 60 mph

  • I'd like to point out that most other reviews are getting sub 4.0 second 0-60s for this car.

  • I'd price this car for myself if I was in a moderate climate but living in Chicago I need AWD for the shitty winters. Oh well.

  • What a piss poor way to present this car. I grew up watching this guy but after watching Top Gear over the last half a decade I have to say this was apocalyptically boring. There is just over six minutes of film here and only ten seconds of good information. Nothing in the way of feeling, how it feels in the corners, or anything negative they didn’t like about it. This road test is the equivalent of a shitty Pop band; no substance at all and designed so no one would be offended. EPIC FAIL.

  • I generally like german cars over american cars, but I would take this over the m3.

  • Why the FUCK would you put awd in a muscle car. Stfu tuner fanboys

  • did they say 124 through the traps???? lol

  • I hope Santa gives me one for Christmas.

  • Stang TV has a test of the Laguna Seca Boss 302 on the dyno placing 416 Horsepower at the rear wheel and 355 lbs of torque......check it out! Based on a 15% loss due to driveline components, that puts the 2012 Boss at 490 HP at the flywheel by my calculations. Ford as certainly underrated the horsepower of this engine in my opinion.

  • i cant c how u guys are arguing in the boss 302 favor. for one how the hell do you lose torque when adding heads upgraded cams valves and intake manifold. if u were to take a stock ls1 and add all those upgrades you'll have a faster car then that. hp means crap in a 0-60 time its all about torque more torque better launch.

  • @personman8 The Boss 302 losses 10 ft-lbs but the reg 5.0's torque drops off quicker. Yes torque gets things moving from a dig but HP keeps them moving and the Boss 302 is still making power at its 900 RPM higher redline and will put out almost 500 HP with a disabled rev limiter @ 8000 RPM!

  • bring back the t.a. single cam 6.0 3400lbs with a tr6060 and around 480hp....omg. but theyd prob be idiots and build it on the camaro platform. i tried to get a job there but anyone with good ideas and designs is turned awaay

  • traction too low it desperately needs awd

  • @dave777blaster It does 60 in 4.1s and the Boss does 60 in 3.9s, the 2013 Shelby Mustang needs 305s in the rear, launch control, and the Torsen differential that's about it. The $105,000 ZO7 Vette does 60 in a rippin 3.8s and an 11.9s 1/4 mile, now that's bang for the buck for you.

  • @1vdn992 that's all good  but no awd makes it a useless car

  • Comment removed

  • Details surrounding the 2013 Mustang Shelby GT500 have surfaced as part of a new labor agreement between Ford & the UAW, foreshadowing what should lead to a modular rendition of the 351ci / 5.8l Romeo-built power plant, slated to land in the 2013 Shelby GT500. Sources say this engine should easily pump out over 600hp, putting Ford Mustang ahead of the ZL1 in the race to the moon."How so?", some might ask... well, the reported 5.8l V8 is to be supercharged as well.

    Oct, 9 2011

  • @1vdn992 interesting, wouldn't it make more sense to give it the new 6.2 liter truck engine?

  • Awesome review! $44k for a stock track car that is an M3 competitor, not too shabby!

  • Just want people to know that if you have to deal with sasserdave please be aware that hes a Psycho and will e-mail and e-mail you and stalk you like there's no end so block him now before the nightmare begins. Help make youtube better for everyone and report him. I hope hes not out in the real world hes not doing this and might end up harming someone. Just looking out for the rest of you.

  • Umm... trap 124 mph? I knew this thing was fast, but is that possible? Seems like 124 mph would render at least something like a 12.1 quarter mile. Maybe it was the mild 0-60 under major wheel spin.

  • @AdamsJoshua85 It was a mistake, the trap speed was 114. This was brought to the attention of Motor Week but it was too late to correct the show.

  • @AdamsJoshua85 its some kind of typo. probably meant 114

  • 12.4 at 124 MPH? 124? lol

  • Man this car is beautiful! Glad American manufacturers are making a come back.

  • I just wish this came with a HID setup

  • I've been a fan of motorweek since I was 10 years old... I'm now 30 and it's still my favorite car review show!!! :-)

  • VERY NICE, I WANT ONE!

  • I love this show and I think John is the best car reviewer ever!

  • I LOVE MOTORWEEK but i can hit 60 in my laguna secs i got last week in 4.0 i know it has timer in it

  • Will they do another Bullet or Mach 1?

  • only good mustang was the mach one now all mustangs suck CHEV RULES

  • @macktenful Chevy blows. The Camaro is sloppy POS, it's built like an econobox.

  • @idontcare80 im a ford owner but i dont like some of there cars

  • next time do a review on the SuperSnake...

  • for once an american car cares about other things besides just hp! still the huge problem with mustangs and other muscle cars is every single american wants one because "it looks cool" or "omfg it has 263743657 hp". resulting in way too many stupid base model muscle cars so its not exiting. now im exited like a little kid when i see a car like a subaru sti, but muscle cars just get so boring seeing them all day

  • Ford sucks

  • one day i will one one of these....one day. guess ill settle with my grand prix GXP and 93' 5.0 mustang for awhile. and john davis hasnt aged one bit over the years!

  • The real question is, did they give him the red key?

  • im amazed by the mpg... that can't be right

  • Comment removed

  • I like what Motorweek did with under the hood zooming in and moving around. That's a first!. Kudos

  • Is there any particular reason he felt the need to talk throughout the entire acceleration run?

  • How did it manage to do 124 mph in the quarter with that modest power increase? I understand 114 but that must be an error

  • Is it weird that when I saw the interior on this beast I was like, "wow! that looks really nice!" I mean...it's a muscle car....with a nice interior! .. crazy.

  • this mustang is good but the camaro ZL1 is way better plus it has more power and torque, so ford try again

  • @octane520 Are you kidding me the reason the ZL1 has all that power is cause its heavy as hell. Sorry bud but the Mustang will whip its ass especially if its up against the Shelby GT 500..

  • @soyntgo4it wow 500 pounds heavier lol such a fooled fan boy

  • Comment removed

  • @soyntgo4it lol look at what u typed the gt500 isnt bad but it isnt great not a zl1 killer by anymeans and if it is please show how it is, with less power less handling ability and its out dated motor witch isnt gonna be changed in till 2015 to take on the zl1 using a bored out 5.4 to 351 cubic inches and a better supercharger pushing over 600 hp but at the same time the camaro will be awaiting a refresh and ford the ones who lied about not taking a bailout not the real American car company

  • @sasserdave They didn't take the bailout my friend they sold all their other brands and shares do the research. Sorry bud your wrong.

  • @soyntgo4it yes they did bud hate to burst your bubble its on the news turn on your tv and see for yourself all there commercials where they brag about not taking one have been taken down due to them being cought watch the news not look on fourms there bud

  • @sasserdave My buddy is a Rep for Ford and they did not take the bailout, sorry to burst your bubble. But that the reason I left GM as a Rep myself and went to Ford.. thank you have a good day now..

  • @soyntgo4it Ford did take money please look it up, They even registered the loan with the SEC. Ford's credit arm took around $16 billion. They did take the loan so they could have cash on hand. They did not need the money to stay in business like GM but they still held there hand out to take it. They only took it because it was difficult to get a loan at the time.

    Are you going to leave Ford now, I hope not it is still a better company than GM.

  • @RGW88 Hmm I still don't believe that but to each there own on what we believe ya know. No I like Ford GM is lost cause in my opinion.

  • @soyntgo4it Doesn't matter, i still prefer a GM product over a ford product. 

  • @TorqueMachine Good for you.

  • @soyntgo4it Yep, so next time dont make negative comments on GM, maybe thats why you lost your job.

  • @TorqueMachine Dude seriously are you going to start too? I didn't lose my job thank you very much. I left and went to a better company.

  • @soyntgo4it Your right, i apologize.

  • @soyntgo4it They did not take it thats true! But there where going to! look it up haha.

  • @Rayjumpsbaby But they didn't..

  • @soyntgo4it and dont comment to me anymore i cant take u serious talking shit when u have no videos and u have a mini van wallpaper are u 10 and thats what your parents drive?

  • Comment removed

  • @soyntgo4it spell check maybe lol and wtf are u talking about steeling shit ????????

  • Comment removed

  • @soyntgo4it dude i cant understand your comment u cant spell u repeat yourself making u look stupid were u droped as a babie? or did u eat to many paint chips

  • @sasserdave hah.....paint chips....good one :)

  • Comment removed

  • @soyntgo4it lmfao me psycho lol looks whos fliping out, damn your stupid and u repeat your self in every comment i think your the one who is gay u keep coming back like u love me with your little hate comments lol u sad little troll.

  • Comment removed

  • @soyntgo4it and comment is spelled comment not come, and sence is spelled sence not scene, so stop taking what i say like eating paint chips and find somthing of your own and wow i misspelled a word at least u can make out what i typed and u started this by putting down a car u would never be able to affoard and dont hate me cause i own a car and your just a little shit talking 5 or 10 year old that loves mini vans are u gay?

  • @sasserdave Anyway you wanker I have blocked you after this message. Je ne perds pas mon temps avec les enfants qui ont été consanguines. Encore une fois dyslexiques haha je ne peux pas causer de graves mec ne vous regardez votre dernier commentaire. Arrêtez de tirer merde de ton cul. Obtenez de l'aide que vous en avez besoin. Comment all you want I wont get your message and wont be able to reply..

  • @soyntgo4it pussy ass puta

  • @soyntgo4it ok i give u that point the ZL1 is a heavy car but i love to see the mustang vs camaro go at it on the track to which is the better pony car

  • @octane520 There are a few videos posted and the results will shock you.

  • @octane520 There are a few videos posted and the results will shock you.

  • @soyntgo4it cant wait

  • why say tail, we all know you mean ass?

    These reviews would be better if you swore some more.

  • Ehh...forced induction/Dana 44 for the front wheels/20"wheels/4.10s/ LSD in both Axels THEN it'll be FUN. Right now it's just m3 comp...

  • what kind of gas does it take?

  • @vintimv001 reg. gas

  • I think this is the first mustang that has interested me in years. The last mustang that made me really interested was the Cobra R. They recently have gotten too heavy and bland. Sorta heavy and nothing special, this car seems to be getting back to fords motorsport history a bit. It looks responsive as hell and the paint, although a bit outlandish, works well on this car.

  • There's something wrong with ya'lls trap speed. There's no way that car will trap 124. It's amazing enough some people have gotten it to 116-118, but NO way on the 124

  • proud to own one of these xD

  • 12.4@124? Trap seems usually high

  • @torment12345 maybe they meant 114? 124 is a 911 turbo style trap speed...

  • @maestroadam I agree, must have been a mistake. C&D clocked 109mph and Motortrend got 115mph. Huge difference, but still...124 would be redonk.

  • Doesn't the 5.0 in the Mustang take premium fuel..?

  • @2000mercurysable No 87 Octane

  • Comment removed

  • sorry. fords suck. chevy for LIFE. camaro ss will blow this lil serpent out its hole. :)

  • @mayadachi --Camaro is a pig. Worse pony car of them all.

  • @mayadachi stfu dumbass if you know anything about cars you wouldnt post such an idiotic comment. jeez.

  • @DevPack lol really? personal insults? really? okay....

  • @mayadachi well the foolish comment you just made did not help.

  • @DevPack Government Motors FAG!!

  • @mayadachi Sorry jack but the 4200lb ZL1 doesn't stand a chance against this car on a closed course, nice try.

  • @1vdn992 you saying that a 580 hp with a the set up that it has cant be faster then this car ye of little faith all you have to do is look at over all numbers the if the ctsv is faster then the zl1 will be faster just saying

  • @1vdn992 hmm, more like 4000 lbs. That and much improved suspension it will be cake spanking the Boss around a track. It's basically a lighter, better handling, more powerful CTS-V. This is not simply a SS with a supercharger.

  • @cozzey05 4000, where do you get your information from?

  • @1vdn992 that's the number GM has been hinting, the supercharger obviously adds weight but GM has removed weight from other areas of the car. GM has said the weight should stay around the current Camaro SS. Best estimates put it around 3900-4000.

  • @cozzey05 All you have to do genius is google, Camaro ZL1 weighs 4200 lbs, it's all over the web.

  • @1vdn992 yes the SLP ZL1 weighs 4200 lbs but the one made by GM is not known yet. You are talking about two completely different cars buddy.

  • @1vdn992 How did you like hearing the ZL1 tore up the ring in 7:41...beating the Ford GT by 11 seconds. Do you still think the Boss has a chance in hell?

  • first

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more