Added: 3 years ago
From: fantasy0coach
Views: 60,671
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (857)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The crazy frog is retarded. Simple talking over those who have the opposing view is not a rational response. In any case it makes a conversation harder to follow. Grow up.

    Bill (while incorrect in my opinion) stated perfectly rational arguments so why censor him?

    Hell even Dawkins accepts most of his points and he is hardly overly generous in tolerance.

  • hahahaha! OMG!!! This a so funny video!!!!

  • I have a hard time telling which voice is crazy frog and Bill's.

  • 44% in uk seems quite small.

    There are only like 3 people in my year at school who believe in god, if it's 44% now by the next generation its going to be alot less.

    Well maybe the immigrants offset the actual figures.

  • lol... i dont know why but this is funny!

  • I used to be Bill O'Reilly, then I took an arrow to the knee.

  • While it very well could be true that about 85% in Sweden are non-believers, it should be pointed out that most of the remaining 15% are moderate and sane in their beliefs. I'd be surprised if we had more than 0,05% creationists.

    Well...maybe the numbers are a bit different now that we welcome so many muslim refugees from the OilWars. But in a generation or two they will most likely also let go of the blue blanket.

  • Bill... LOL says Atheists were responsible for the worst mass murders in history... aside from the countless religious mass murders like the crusades, Nazism, Islamic conquest of the world -that has been on going for 15 centuries. ROFL!!

  • @6thMessenger Religous mass murdering went on long before year 400 AD to. Romans persecuted christians for their beliefs too. and there were probably religious persecutio before that to

  • @EAroste

    Exactly my point. Atheists are the least offenders.

  • Only 44% in Great Brittan? Well at least they're getting there, good luck increasing that number Brittan.

  • @powecell

    and instead you exposed a deprivation of aptitude of yourself.

  • @powecell

    yeah it is just you. Anyone who seeks true freedom of expression would understand.

  • @powecell

    because attempts at censorship, or promotion of censorship, piss me off. Delusional self important retards that deserve nothing but ridicule and abuse. This friendless fuck being a prime example.

  • That stupid singing everytime when O'Reilly opens his mouth just sucks. I meen, it's not necessary, you can hear without that, that his claims make no sense what so ever...

  • i cant stand o'reilly and i respect RD.... but damn putting that stupid annoying voice over o'reilly is childish and annoying as fuck... no respect to the creator of this vid.

  • tides go in tides go out. YOU CAN'T EXPLAIN THAT!!!! ლ(ಠ益ಠლ)

  • W.T.F. is that noise over O'Reilly's voice? Fucking Hilarius. O'Reilly = Puss Festering Shitpocket.

  • the sum of the interview

    Bill O'reilly brings Dawkins on the show, treats Dawkins like an asshole, and then finishes the interview before Dawkins can even say anything.

  • fuck you

  • At first the background noise was annoying, then it became hysterically funny! Nice video... Sweden is the place to live.

  • Mr. DUH-kins needs to have his PhD recalled. He is such dunce.

  • @tamarind777 Because?

  • @TheWalrusface

    I have NEVER heard him use science to back up any of his claim for evolution. I wonder how he feels about the fresh dinosaur bones found, along with fresh blood cells and other soft tissue, of a T-Rex in 2002. Conclusion of evolutionists? They don't question the age of the bones, but the PROCESS of fossilization! That is science? The very first thing that should be questioned is the supposed age of the dinosaur, 70mil. y/o. That is not critical thinking.

  • really, I understand you don't like O'realy's point of view, but to blur over his voice with that sound effect. Why even post the debate ? It really shows you are not listening to the opposition. Your dogma may be the right dogma but with actions like that it will remain a dogma.

  • Dear friends, if you see garbage like this on Youtube, block the user and flag the video for misleading text. If enough people do it, the account will be suspended & the video removed.

    Did you know that Youtube processes over ONE HUNDRED YEARS worth of video footage everyday? How much of it is time-wasting crap like this, rickrolls & other bullshit? Let's work together for a better internet.

    Copy and paste this message wherever you find time-wasting garbage.

    Thumbs up this comment.Thanks.

  • @MarcLira66

    and who the fuck are you moron? if you dont like it, everyone should try and censor should they?

    You are a waste of oxygen, fuck off.

  • @fantasy0coach Temper, temper… There are other, better versions of this interview, without the annoying dubbed noises of blabbing and yammering… this is just an attempt to get some channel views. Given that you have twice more dislikes than likes. I say the majority despised your childish attempt at “attention whoring”. I could try to have a duel of intellects with you; but given your orthography and your vocabulary, it seems you are unarmed… XD

  • @MarcLira66

    Thanks for your ignorant and unaware opinion. If you had your brain outside of your ass you may have noticed that my vid is listed as comedy. Anyone who thinks this listing would be anything other than humour, would have to be infantile considering it's placement.

    Whether you find matching the annoying and delirious monotone of fuckstick oreilly with an identical dribble noise, humorous, is a matter of opinion. And i could not care less about you, when making MY vids. You can FO.

  • @fantasy0coach 400+ people (~2:1) could not find the humor in it at all... Sorry if we are not amused at your amateur attempt at comedy. Some people have talent for humor, and others, like you, don't... Don't be angry that so many people disliked your video... That inane type of comedy, stops being funny when you turn 12...

  • @MarcLira66

    lmao, 400 people out of 57000 views is a miniscule percentage. if you were not such a delirious retard who thinks anyone actually gives a shit about what you or others think, maybe you could achieve 1 subscriber or a friend. But I doubt it, it appears you are the feeble type, probably wank over the bible every night I imagine.

    Is that your talent? Moronship? You are certainly brain dead, for starters.

  • @fantasy0coach You can post what you want I guess, but it's pretty hard to argue that this isn't inane bullshit. Then again, we're talking about a website whose most popular channels are shit like Shane Dawson and Smosh...

  • when he mentioned Hitler as "the greatest atheist mass murderers modern times" i started to listen to the sound put over his

  • What the f... did my ad blocker stop working?

    No.

    Fuck. How is this supposed to be amusing?

  • 2:51 Dawkins is like.. right... ok hes a dumb fuck wit

  • ever notice how you can say "Bill O'Reilly" in a sarcastic tone and it sounds like, "Bill... oh really?"

  • Dawkins got nuttin to say.... haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa­a PWNED!!!

  • FUCKING ANNOYING NOISE IN THE BACKGROUND!!

  • Religion makes me sick. I´m so happy there are people like Dawkins given it to them.

  • I believe in Jesus, everything happening around the world announces is return (and not all is related to climate change) but im not trying to convince anybody since you need to have the willing to at least try to know a little bit more about Christ, about the truth

  • BiLL "Im not posetive that jesus is god, but I'm throwing in with jesus" Now just before this was said there was a question one who is making a leap of faith. Not sure if jesus is god. Well in that case who knows, maybe he is satan?

    jk what I understand Jesus was the son of god, making them both supreme beings with vast knowledge of everything. Aliens if you will.

  • I think Mr Dawkins does believe in greater intelligence, only that he wouldn't acknowledge that , that intelligence is called God.

  • Hitler was a Christian.

    Stalin, Pol Pot and Mao adapted Atheism simply because It abolished religion so that they could establish cults of personality, and become gods themselves.

    Learn your fucking facts you dumb fucks.

  • fucking hell that bullshit playing in the background is annoying

  • @thrallsson It's because 99.99% of what O'Reilly says is utter bullshit, so he may as well be the crazy frog guy. haha

  • Stop that fucking babbling in the background audio, holy shit, im trying to listen.

  • the question: God exists, or not?. Dawkins: "science working for it" xD. loooool. Dawkins is reallly crazy, and when he die will see the truth!. HARD TRUTH!....

  • @mobiledev Christians: "There's no evidence, I just know." At least science is progressing. God can go fuck himself.

  • @MrWigglyy are you blind?. no evidence?... look at my channel (in favorities - some movies are there). There are historic proof, science proof, paranormal evidence, miracles, healings, testimonies, exorcism. Life. Man wake up because it's not about a stupid science. Only for your eternity.

  • @mobiledev There is no historical evidence proving the existence of Jesus. Only a few very vague documents.You just insulted science, but now it supports your cause? I'm done.

  • @MrWigglyy There are many historic proof. You can find many new archeologic proof. For example search in google - "Has Noah's Ark Been Found on Turkish Mountaintop" - first link google. Other "Moses Miracle, Roads in The Middle of The Sea" - first link google (this is proof of bible, but natural miracle), or search "The Ark of the Covenant - Rediscovered!!!" -first link google. Want more? search. So if God exists then devil exists to. If devil exists then - thing what this mean. sry for english.

  • @mobiledev Those are all tabloidesque sites with no viable sources. They also claim that there are babies living in the ruins of the titanic. Nice evidence.

  • @MrWigglyy and of course many proof o Jesus. For example "Flavius Josephus" say about him. there is so much historical evidence that you can not talk about their lack of ...

  • @MrWigglyy its only your will, to belive or not. But open your mind, because i must say that - we are living in end times. According to the bible we live in such times because the predictions come true. For example "rebirts of Israel", or look on youtube "peace and security", red moon, earthquakes, mass animal die,. There is no time to say "belive or not to belive". Please only search evidence or something. Jesus loves us, and want to rescue everybody. Do not be so resistant. just search.

  • @mobiledev The only end we are facing will be at the hands of nuclear war. A bunch of unisex soldiers with wings descending from the sky sounds a bit ridiculous. Jesus will not return, Christianity is a man made fairytale.

  • I love how Fox just labels Dawkins as "Atheist" not sighting his credentials as an author, professor, lecturer or anything else of which are of more importance. The dubbed over noises are stupid however, and actually detract from the respectable atheists' rational desire for fair debate.

  • @fantasy0coach I do not mean to say that OReilly gives a fair debate. He doesn't. I'd probably guess that his microphone is *louder* than the guest merely for the appearance of out shouting the guest.

    However, I meant to convey that most rational atheist would prefer to simply (and for the most part- easily) outmaneuver their religious opponent in an interview or debate than to have a charlie brown's teacher voice superimposed.

    I will never in my life claim Bill OReilly to be fair and balanced

  • @EnderZ13 He is called an "atheist" because this is how he is spending his time and efforts. Atheism is Dawkins driving force and this is what his books are about. This interview is not about science, but about the existence of God.

  • @EnderZ13 That tells you how "objective" fox news is 

  • @EnderZ13 Well given that I am looking at the label saying ...Dawkings....author of "the God delusion" and the fact they mentioned it was a best seller seems to make your point seem rather selective. eg at 4.33

  • What in the world is with the annoying sounds!!??

  • @JJBeev They always dub stuff over when people are speaking the truth.Thats something most don't want they would rather just have lies.

  • well that's pretty dumb.... the annoying sounds only come on when Bill is speaking. I think it would be better if we could hear BOTH sides of this argument.

  • Tides go in, tides go out. YOU CAN"T EXPLAIN THAT!

  • Look at all of these atheists who were so terrible. Now you can do the same thing with religious people, but I won't listen to it.

  • TO MUCH ANNOYING SOUND IN ALL VIDEO ,NO GOOD!!!!!!!!! IS PREY?

  • The annoying thing every time Bill spoke. LMAO

  • This O'Reilly creature dances to the tune of the network paying his wages, one must remember that religion these days is big business, and across this planet there are more than enough weak minded fools who actually believe doctrines over two millenia old, and who also believe that the life eternal awaits them upon death. Better to cherish every second of awareness afforded to you, for you and i will never be here again

  • Fox News Lies

  • I want to move to Sweden.

  • @CatoptricCistula Just come it's great here!

    

  • @CatoptricCistula I've recently moved to Sweden. There's about the same amount of Christians here as there are in England - practically none.

  • @CatoptricCistula Come here :D we like rational and logical people ;)

  • @CatoptricCistula That's what I've been saying!...

  • @CatoptricCistula

    It seems like many want to come here. But most of them aren't atheist, rather the opposite, which is a shame, but maybe good in a way, because then we maybe can get a more open society by discuss and accepting one another. I don't get this fox news crap. They treat god as the most certain fact. The fact is that religion has adjust itself after science on many crucial points. A text can't live forever - the society changes.

  • OMG BILL O'REILLY IS SUCH A FUCKING MORONIC CUNT!!!!!

    RELIGION IS OBVIOUS BULLSHIT!!!

  • Why put that crap over when Bill speaks. He's talking nonsense as it is without putting that annoying crap over the top

  • It's a straw-man argument that Dawkins uses when he makes all belief in God the same. The Bible teaches that there's true religion and false religion. Therefore the Bible is anti religion if its false. It doesn't place non-belief (atheism) in a neutral position, it labels it under all the other false beliefs. You can't expect a Christian to give up the Bible based a theory that seems to be failing scientific scrutiny. The God Delusion offers nothing new.

  • Dawkins: "we have a very full understanding.. of why life is there" Thats nonsense. How can Dawkins claim to have a full understanding of why life exists. No one knows about the origins of life. Evolution cannot account for the origins of life.

  • @dadov I'v lived in Sweden and Sweden next to England and are the WORST racist counties in the world and I'v seen the whole world I haven't looked at statistics because that is what I experienced in 18years. They are passive but very agressive, cold and jelous. Most of them have got an inferiority complex hence they feel they have to out do foreigners, they also were the only country to let Hitler go through to Norway and Finland to kill people! Also ten years ago they were num1 in suicide

  • @bradyhater1 Religion is fact. The fact is...all these things have an order to its creation. It did not happen by chance. There is a creator, a grand designer to this all. God is like a musician. But you can not hear it because you have closed your ears. You are deaf and hide behind something else artifical, such as science.

  • @bradyhater1 No, religion says " These things that are here have an order to them. There is no way these things just happened by accident. There has to be a higher order of things which created this." Science does not offer that as a conclusion. Atheists just use science like it is a religion. But is an empty one. Organized religion created by people is more creative than the boring one science has to offer. That is what I was saying.

  • @ARepublicanVictory

    Why does there have to be an order? I say the order came from great sky dwelling penguins as they are the most ordered animal. our god is a penguin and anyone who doesnt like snow is going to be pecked to death by horned penguins for eternity. And penguins are not that keen on you touching yourself either so leave your dick alone or it's penguin hell. Trust me I know. Come join my religion, I also have absolutely nothing to confirm my god is real........like you.

  • @fantasy0coach And if you say that, I would say that you indeed make up your own stories. Penguins are birds that can not fly. We know this already. There is order because even science shows it. Look at atoms, molecules and other things which build up living systems. This did not just happen by accident. And your being sarcastic is nothing more than a childish attempt to discredit my owning sorry atheist idiots.

  • @ARepublicanVictory

    Penguins are birds that not can fly but humans can fly? lmfao. this is why my story is made up and yours isnt?

    lol, tell me about atoms and molecules and other things and their order? What order? Alphabetical order?

    I am starting to think you may be dribbling y'know. 

  • @fantasy0coach You make no sense now. You are making garbage up and then you attack me when I apply the proper solution to the equation. Penguins can not fly. We know that. Even science knows this. But, out of ignorance, you attack my argument and try and justify the non existence of God via yours using penguins. That was one of the dumbest things I have ever read. I guess you are the one dribbling y'know.

  • @ARepublicanVictory

    It would seem dumb by someone who cannot recognise obvious sarcasm, like you. To those that can, it illustrates that my ludicrous story has the same amount of evidence to support it than your ludicrous religion.

    Your god is supposedly in human form and flying around in the non existent heavens. My penguin is in penguin form flying around in the heavens. Science has proven both humans and penguins cant fly. Making your story no less ridiculous than mine, using your logic.

  • @fantasy0coach I recognized your sarcasm, but that does not mean I care for it. It was dumb to assume that I did not recognize it in the first place. Your story has no evidence to support anything. I would believe Greek mythology than I would it.

    God is not in human form. God made man IN HUMAN FORM. And the only non existent thing here is your stupid rebuttal. There are other planes of reality and existences other than our own. Your penguin story is yours. You're stupid if you think otherwise

  • @ARepublicanVictory

    lol, really? Just asked my penguin priest, penguin god, made man in human form because he didnt like flippers for feet. So that clears that up. Believe me now? It is the truth.

    What other planes of reality and existences are there? i will ask PG if it knows of them for you.

  • @fantasy0coach You are a stupid atheist who is just wasting my time now. I have no more time for your stupid asinine stories or what YOU believe. I have other things that I have to do now, like WORK. Something you know nothing about. Most idiot atheists like you get welfare checks and support perverted ideologies like this one, for example.

  • @ARepublicanVictory

    You have no time for my stupid asinine stories? lol...I feel the same way. Now you know why humanity has no time for religion and its stupid asinine stories, dont you?

    You have the education and awareness of a gnat. Your stupidity astounds chickens. Seek mental help before you mindlessly stumble in front of a bus.

  • @fantasy0coach Most of humanity is religious. The only one who is asinine here is yourself and people who are dumb enough to think that God does not exist. God has willed it this way through faith. And when you are wrong, the stiff penalty to your worthless existence will be plenty. The world does not need to be any more nilistic and evil as it is now. It certainly does not need boring and useless atheism either.

  • @ARepublicanVictory

    you are a delusional embarrassment for humanity. Puff the magic dragon is not real. The fact that people are defrauded by heinous money sucking cults like your religion, is not an argument for obvious insanity. We have knowledge, dont need your childish input any longer, religion is dying, and doomed. Has been ever since the ludicrous fables were penned by ancient ignorant dolts.

    Let's hope science learns to perform brain transplants soon, for your sake.

  • Comment removed

  • @fantasy0coach Religion is not dying or is doomed. There are far more believers in God, Allah, Buddah and Shiva than there are atheists in the world. You can not convience people that God is not real when you have no real proof that he is not. Science, as a religion is shallow. You need to understand that and move on now.

    Brain transplants don't mean an end to a strong faith in God. Even if you got one, that does not mean it will save your arrogant and ignorant ass from going to hell.

  • @ARepublicanVictory

    There are far less believers as a percentage of the population than their was 100 years ago. Then less again than 200 years ago, etc etc etc. It was only a matter of time and knowledge discovery to put the ridiculous fairy tales known as religion into the fictional category. We learned enough to realise this about 250 years ago. Nowadays we have so much knowledge religion is an old joke. Except for the gullible and the oppressed.

    Hell? what a laugh. What is hell?

  • @fantasy0coach No, you are a dilusional embarrassment for humanity. I know puff the magic dragon is not real. I never said he was. Cults exist, and people are heinous, but that does not mean faith is. People are corruptable, not God. An argument for the insanity is people who arrogantly say that God does not exist when they have never been dead or had near-death experiences. We have knowledge, but that is due to God. Even in the Bible, it said that men would be like Gods. Are we there yet

  • @ARepublicanVictory

    lol. people are corruptable yes, which is why con men created your god story to corrupt people with. We understand death. We know where we go when we die. In the coffin. Then, in the ground, or cremated. If you want to check go dig up your graveyard. You will find the people still there. Could this not be clearer for you? Is that not very obvious? or are you just so desperate for immortality that you will childishly believe anyone who promises it?

  • @fantasy0coach Actually, a con man created yours, one who was an atheist Communist and hid behind science as well. He made science a religion and said God does not exist. The greatest con man also said "ye eyes will be like God." That con man was Satan. You are being played like a cheap tune.

  • @ARepublicanVictory

    lol, satan. Who is that? Is that the other dude in your head, along with god? is this a case a triple personality schizophrenia? I am sure no one will be able to find your god and satan friends, outside of your head. No?

  • @fantasy0coach Take the time and pick up a Bible. You would understand more if you read up on Satan and how he has you. You can not believe in him all you like, but, that does not mean he does not believe in you. Use all the ad hominems you like, but they mean nothing until you learn that atheism is for doomed fools.

  • @ARepublicanVictory

    I could pick up a bible. or i could pick up Mary Poppins and try and fly off the roof with an umbrella.

    It would be equally ludicrous y'know....thinking any of it was fact and not just imaginative nonsense. What bit of the bible confirmed it as factual for you? Talking snakes? Noahs ark? Water into wine? Which of those obvious real occurrences confirmed it?

    Let me guess.....the suggestion of immortality? lol. Such a clever fraud isnt it?

  • @fantasy0coach Yes, you definetly need to pick up a Bible. You are lost and even Mary Poppins would be able to save you.

  • @ARepublicanVictory

    Yeah I dont let imagined beings find me very often. It is really not that hard to do you know. I dont think I have even had one looking for me.

    But that's ok, i dont need saving, I am doing just fine. Making squillions performing abortions for girls I am knocking up on a regular basis. There is nothing like drugs and alcohol to bring on raging sexual lust and overall good times. So much fun this life stuff. if you dont waste it.

  • @ARepublicanVictory Look through my comments. I haven't made a signle argument on whether god exists or not. It is completely irrelevant to the subject I brought up. It's so ironic that you are so biased about me being biased. Even more so when I'm not.

    But you can't distinguish between the way an argument is made and the actual argument. In your mind, O'Reilly HAS TO BE making a good case, because he is on the right side. But he doesn't. This doesn't take away from the religious case, only Bil

  • @darkmater4tm Your arguments make connections that God does not exist via your non heaven references. I am biased against you? LOL, YOU are biased against the Christian religion or any in general. I am merely suggesting that God and Heaven does indeed exist. I could care any lesser about distinguishing between the way an argument is made and the actual argument. That is NOT the point.

  • @ARepublicanVictory That IS the point. It is the point I made in the 1 month old comment to which you replied. It's not my fault that you can't get it right.

    And what non-heaven references did I make? Are you making this stuff up as you go? Didn't you even notice that I don't even care to debate god's existence?

  • @bradyhater1 So with a small mind like your own, you may as well say there may have been a higher power than us. But you will not because Atheists have no real creative thinking ability other than how to put down people of the faith.

  • Atheists repeatedly try to respond to the issue of trying to account for rationality founded in universal truth statements also known as logical absolutes. But in all their trying and all their attempted logical outcry, they fail. Why? Because atheism doesn’t have the substance to account for rationality. It is deficient as a worldview.

  • sounds like Nelly Furtado.

  • So we came from nothing (the big bang) then we evolved from distant animal relatives on a planet thats close enough to where we don't freeze far enough away to where we don't burn up. NDE's are just chemical reactions in the brain? really?!? It seems it would take more faith to be an atheist than to ever be a Christian any day

  • are you fucking retarded? why the fuck have you ruined this video?

    what a cunt

  • @bradyhater1 remember, its also pretty damn easy to say "GOD! thats it!"

  • Thanks for ruining an interesting interview with this bullshit.

  • ATHEISM IS EVIL

  • LMAO!! funny tune in the background. Cracked me up every time. It really DID sound a lot like O'Reilly!

  • you don't need to put a bullshit tune for us to know this prick is full of shit. Anyone who can't tell that he's all over the place, desperately trying to stay ahead by interrupting and changing the subject, is lost to the art of debating.

  • @darkmater4tm The prick is that Dawkins guy.

  • @ARepublicanVictory how would you know? he didn't even finish a thought.

    this is just your biased religious self speaking

    I'm talking about an objective observation about how the "interview" was carried out

    the art of debating is lost to you ;p

  • @darkmater4tm I know by what I see. Dawkins is an atheist moron. It is no point in this interview anyway. O'Reilly actually wasted time on this atheistic prick who will find out the "hot" way about doubting God after the death of his physical body.

  • @ARepublicanVictory as I already said, ucome to this interview with an opinion already formed, and saw what u wanted to see.

    I, as person with the ability to be objective even on matters I have an opinion on, was shocked by the way this "journalist" interviewed his guest. I didn't even know O'Reilly before this (I'm not american), but I remember him now as the shittiest, most incompetent, most biased, anti-professional journalist PRICK to my knowledge. And Dawkins beliefs are irrelevant to that

  • @darkmater4tm And you don't? You say that you are objective? I have found out that most Europeans do not believe in God anymore. So, that means that being objective may be more challenging for you than you may think. Are you an atheist darkwater? I know that most atheists and Left Wingers from out of America hate O'Reilly. This is because he believes in God and he does not side with Left Wing bullshit fringe.

  • @ARepublicanVictory Yes I'm a european atheist. And yes I can be objective. Not because I'm european or atheist, but because it's a trait I've worked on because I value it. I call myself on my bullshit as much as others.

    But I don't hate O'Reilly or his ideas. He just is a disgrace to his profession. In this video he invited a person to lecture him and then shoo him off in the pretence of interview. What's more, he's out of his league is he is well aware of it. I can tell by his strategy on ...

  • @darkmater4tm O'Reilly is not a disgrace to his profession, he is at the top of it. As I have said before, O'Reilly has already figured this clueless atheist out due to the overused attacks against God's existence claims. O'Reilly is not out of his league. I think Dawkins is clearly out of his league. But then again, I could never remember a time when any atheist was not out of his/her league when debating about God. The almighty God does indeed exist.

  • @ARepublicanVictory this interview. He constantly changes the subject and tries to talk more that Dawkins. It doesn't take a genius in social interactions to know where that comes from. He is afraid that Dawkins has heard it all and can own him with mere canned counter-arguments. So he tries to stay ahead by monopolizing the interview.

    It's not even his usual thing. I've seen him grind on the same argument over and over when it's a good one. He just knows he's outmatched here.

  • @darkmater4tm He is not outmatched here. I am sure O'Reilly has heard it all from atheists too. There arguments about God not existing is tired and plain. Atheists have no proof and science does not have an answer for everything.

  • @darkmater4tm which makes a point on what? You're confused. I haven't made a point on who's right, I merely observed the methods used to make a point. Two completely independent things.

  • @darkmater4tm Your observations are biased, like most people of the Left. You are an atheist, so you already agree with Dawkins. So even if O'Reilly did not let the man speak, you already had a conclusion. Your conclusion was that Dawkins, an atheist, like you, is correct. What O'Reilly did does not even matter.

  • @ARepublicanVictory you see, I have taken an interest in the art of debating (the art itself, not just the subjects) and I can identify the methods used to carry it out. I can tell who's being defensive or who's leading the exchange fo example. And that's what I'm critisizing on O'Reilly.

  • @darkmater4tm Your interest in the art of debating still does not hide your bias for Dawkins and his anti God stance. That is NOT the point.

  • @ARepublicanVictory A good interview's job is to extract information from his guest. He does so by asking neutral questions and letting the guest elaborate on them. He may offer critisism at the end.

    A good debater makes his point by letting the other side complete a thought, then explain the faults in it or offers a different perspective.

    O'Reilly is neither, because he did neither.

  • He's making it sound "unbelievable" that "OMG 40% does NOT believe in god".

    Poor old man

  • what a pile of crap

  • fuck u who ever put this on

  • This so annoying.Thanks for wasting my time.

  • well whether u believe in God or not this world has a rendevous with God and we are being judged.

  • you are a waste of life

  • I fucking hate the crazy frog.

  • Ruined by puerile sound effects.

  • Dawkins, the head athiest, hating God does not take intellect.

  • I think the sound effects was a nice touch. :)

  • whoever put in those fucking sounds: YOU'RE A FUCKING DIPSHIT, THAT WASN'T FUNNY. JUST REALLY FUCKING ANNOYING.

  • HAHAHAHA OMFG!

    EPIC!!!

  • The sound effect is really childish. It is like the original poster is sticking his fingers in his ears and saying "lalalalala- I can' t hear you."

  • In the not too distant future there will be drugs that will treat delusional psychosis such as religion etc. We can mass produce these drugs and cure this problem here and then we can put it in the water-supply of the middle-east. Israel encluded!

  • Since when was Japan in Europe?

  • I agree with "mcrage81". The sound effects are NOT even close to be humorous. Now, do NOT get me wrong here, i am as far away from a fan of bill O'Reilly's, as i possibly can be, but the sound effects are simply NOT funny. I adore Dawkins.

  • go sweden.. wuhuh :)

  • Watch the full video, without any annoying sounds:

    watch?v=2FARDDcdFaQ&feature=re­lated

  • Im about to kill myslef a frog.

  • O'Reilley=product of Roman Catholicsim...He's the best argument for leaving the religion. Mass murderers? HAs he not heard of the Inquisition? ASSHOLE!!

  • Why the song over Bill VOICE? it is not needed. People can understan His dumb without. lol

  • has to come from somewhere ? god??? , so where does god coma from?

  • are you that afraid of some one hearing both sides of the conversation that you have to cover up one side of the conversation

  • Bill needs to read a philosophy book. 

  • FUCKING ANNOYING CRAZY FROG SHIT! PISSES ME OFF SO MUCH!!!!

  • FUCKING PROUD OF BEING SWEDISH!

    FUCKING PROUD!

    Dawkins' a genius.

  • Bill is a wanker

  • Fuck Bill O'reilly, he had no good points. He kept shutting up Dawkins cuz it was his show and he knew he'd get owned if he didn't.

  • @avengedsevenfold100 Reilly is a hypocrite that never wins a debate.

  • how can somebody not have a moral foundation????have they had bad morals but even ants have rules for what they can and not can do, they just had different morals. its very typical for believers not to know that moral is something that u learn, as they learned it from their religious community and schooling, i learned morals from i was small through other people and personal experiences, while believers havent had a chance to make up their own mind, so they say morals is only in the bible

  • You atheists never seem to crack me up with your weightless arguments and irrational responses. No wonder why insult is the only weapon that you have to fight with.

  • @songwriter4artists that says an insane monster like you