Give it twin tails and it would look like a gigantic fighter, as if the Soviets looked at the Foxbat and Foxhound and went "Y'know, this is great but you know what? It could be...BIGGER."
@cliffthelightning How is it better than the B-1? The Tu-160 only carries up to 12 cruise missiles. The Tu-160 only has 2 bomb bays while the B-1 has 3. The B-1 carries a much greater payload. The Tu-160 may have a slightly better range & fly a bit faster, but it's lack of payload is unacceptable.
@ubrbzkr not really the russians came with the tu-22 which flew a few years ealier than the b-1. the tu-160 is a developed tu-22, you can still see the similarities.
The two are not even in the same class. F-111 is comparable to Su-24. Tu-22M/M3 are maritime strike aircraft. Tu-22M3 carries 47,000lbs payload, F-111 only comes in at 30,000.
@bittemeinrammstein The most the F-111 could do (the F model being the latest) was a 12,000lb load with 4 MAU-12 wing pivot-pylons with BRU-3A mounted under them. Each BRU-3A could hold 6 500lb Mk-82 weapons of various configs. So that's 4 BRU's with 6 bombs at 500lbs each. That's 12,000lbs. I know this, as I was a Weapons Systems Specialist for years on the D and F models. All this does not include the weapons bay, as it wasn't used for many years before all of the USAF inventory in 1994.
Dima200022 сбили всего один ТУ-22 и 4 Су-25. Причем нашими же ЗРК с украинскими операторами, потому что тупоголовые грузины не способны ими управлять. А гордиться то есть чем, особенно если посмотреть на колличество жаренных грузинских тушек и брошенного ими оружия.
backfire, cause after attacking, it can return on the Base in Russia. 7000 km.. to blow up bombs on the territory of usa. Else, it has powerful guns in the tail. AND behind the plane nozzles warm air up to 900 C. it is very hot. every plane, that will be behind tu-22 - will be burnt
Chmo, kakim oruzjiem ih sbivali? Nashim torom. Sossi, kakbuto shtoto sami pridumali. Eslihoches pro poteri govorit' smatri v storanu Грузии. Etomu samolyutu uzje dohuya let.
Beautyful bird!
21onkelhotte 3 weeks ago
As a former Marine infantryman,they always told us to hope we never see one of these.
smittyman24 2 months ago
and after they gave the code name they shit their pants.
jayvthompson01 8 months ago
Medium payload bombers are a waste. Either go heavy or go home!
MrElgeneralisimo 9 months ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
No, the B-1 was a Tu-22 ripoff. XD
Istwyd 11 months ago
Russia is ever great. I live in Brazil.
daltonagre 1 year ago
Give it twin tails and it would look like a gigantic fighter, as if the Soviets looked at the Foxbat and Foxhound and went "Y'know, this is great but you know what? It could be...BIGGER."
RRVCrinale 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
It looks like a B-1 ripoff.
seka1986 1 year ago
Comment removed
ITmage 1 year ago
@seka1986 TU22 entered service 1960, TU22M first flight 1969, entered service 1972....B1 entered service 1986....ripoff a?
ITmage 1 year ago
@seka1986 No, the Tu-169 was a B-1 ripoff.
ubrbzkr 1 year ago
@ubrbzkr tu-160 .. and its better than a b1
cliffthelightning 8 months ago
@cliffthelightning How is it better than the B-1? The Tu-160 only carries up to 12 cruise missiles. The Tu-160 only has 2 bomb bays while the B-1 has 3. The B-1 carries a much greater payload. The Tu-160 may have a slightly better range & fly a bit faster, but it's lack of payload is unacceptable.
franknbeans4761 3 months ago
@ubrbzkr Untrue, the Tu-160 is much bigger than the B-1
ooglyduckling 7 months ago 4
@ubrbzkr not really the russians came with the tu-22 which flew a few years ealier than the b-1. the tu-160 is a developed tu-22, you can still see the similarities.
lckniep 3 months ago
Дима 20000 какой то. Информацию свою нужно проверять, дабы словесного поноса было меньше.
ahcel68 1 year ago
I always liked the look of the Tu-22M. I don't know if it will be as good as the F-111 though.
BusterBunker 2 years ago
Its a huge 4 man aircraft that can carry 40 tons or ordanance internally at Mach 2+
xoio 1 year ago
@BusterBunker
The two are not even in the same class. F-111 is comparable to Su-24. Tu-22M/M3 are maritime strike aircraft. Tu-22M3 carries 47,000lbs payload, F-111 only comes in at 30,000.
bittemeinrammstein 1 year ago
I was not saying they were in the same class. I just like the F-111 better.
BusterBunker 1 year ago
@bittemeinrammstein The most the F-111 could do (the F model being the latest) was a 12,000lb load with 4 MAU-12 wing pivot-pylons with BRU-3A mounted under them. Each BRU-3A could hold 6 500lb Mk-82 weapons of various configs. So that's 4 BRU's with 6 bombs at 500lbs each. That's 12,000lbs. I know this, as I was a Weapons Systems Specialist for years on the D and F models. All this does not include the weapons bay, as it wasn't used for many years before all of the USAF inventory in 1994.
jonesy97 1 year ago
Dima200022 сбили всего один ТУ-22 и 4 Су-25. Причем нашими же ЗРК с украинскими операторами, потому что тупоголовые грузины не способны ими управлять. А гордиться то есть чем, особенно если посмотреть на колличество жаренных грузинских тушек и брошенного ими оружия.
OMO505 2 years ago
Why do they call it the "Backfire"?
FalconKPD 2 years ago
All Soviet bombers got a codename beginning with "B". Helicopters got "H", fighters "F", ballistic missiles "S", and so on.
beastatlay 2 years ago
I know about the Nato codename letters, but how could anyone think of something as cool as "Backfire"?
FalconKPD 2 years ago
Yeah, it's good, but not as good as the world's most powerful ICBM: the SS-18..."Satan"!
The Blinder was originally named "Beauty" but was changed because the USAF thought this was too complimentary.
beastatlay 2 years ago
@FalconKPD backfire cause it has a gun on the back
admiralPs 1 year ago
backfire, cause after attacking, it can return on the Base in Russia. 7000 km.. to blow up bombs on the territory of usa. Else, it has powerful guns in the tail. AND behind the plane nozzles warm air up to 900 C. it is very hot. every plane, that will be behind tu-22 - will be burnt
SaIIIa1 2 years ago
@SaIIIa1 heat seeking missiles love it though..lol
hotlanta35 1 year ago
Because it likes to light fires then back into them or lights fires backwards im not sure. But you get the idea :)
TuAFFalcon 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Отхуярили же все эти птички в Грузии....Ту-22 4 шткуи Ту-95 2 штуки Су-25 16 штук ! Этим гордитесь ?
Dima200022 2 years ago
Chmo, kakim oruzjiem ih sbivali? Nashim torom. Sossi, kakbuto shtoto sami pridumali. Eslihoches pro poteri govorit' smatri v storanu Грузии. Etomu samolyutu uzje dohuya let.
Supafly1st 2 years ago