Of course! The evidence proves that this species of fish went extinct when the great flood buried every last one of them in mud! It's so obvious that a caring creator lovingly crafted each of them before violently killing them in the blink of an eye!
On another note: what the hell is an "evolutionary year"? Just how long do evolutionists think a year lasts?
Okay, just because there were more 'advanced' fish so far back does NOT prove creationism, in fact, you're actually proving evolution. Evolution does mean 'the evolutionary advancement of a species'. If that was the case, how come coelocanths and worms are still alive while such advanced animals as dinosaurs (not birds, I'm referring to their relatives) or certain prehistoric mammals died off? And if it did prove creationism, how come there are no 400 million year old human remains?
@ptango666 I know! Just what is he saying? Is he trying to imply that "evolutionists" think years last longer than they actually do? Or that they think years are shorter?
He needs to make another video explaining how long evolutionists think a year is. Just for clarification.
Everything this video discusses is direct evidence in favor of evolution, fits in 100% perfectly with the expectations of evolution research and backs up existing evolutionary ideas. It's amazing how shamelessly creationists are willing to lie to attack scientific facts that they falsely believe go against their faith...plenty of scientists, including Darwin, believe to varying degrees in a creator. and you can't study science without seeing evolution for yourself.
Everything this video discusses is direct evidence in favor of evolution, fits in 100% perfectly with the expectations of evolution research and backs up existing evolutionary ideas. It's amazing how shamelessly creationists are willing to lie to attack scientific facts that they falsely believe go against their faith...plenty of scientists, including Darwin, believe to varying degrees in a creator. and you can't study science without seeing evolution for yourself.
lol WHAT? None of this "baffles" evolutionists. In fact, nothing "baffles" evolution science at all. Evolution is rock-solid with none of the holes or flaws that crackpot conspiracy theorists claim there to be. Every single discovery in the natural world has fit together perfectly with our understanding of evolution, not a single fossil or species ever out of place. We can even use evolution to PREDICT where we will find new creatures and exactly the sort of forms they will take.
@AmeriSkunk For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. John 3:16
Find the love of God here.
Audio, Gospel of John Chapter 1 AV h t t p://w w wDOTyoutubeDOTcom/watch?v=Ao4uaIjd3xs
@BereanBeacon1 whether or not God loves the world and sacrificed his son for us....life evolved. It maybe God designed and controlled evolution, but any way you slice it, we can observe in every conceivable manner that Earth is millions of years old and all life descended from a common ancestry. If the bible conflicts with these facts, it proves the bible fallable because these facts can be SEEN to be the reality.
Remember kids, don't think. The Bible says "Lean not on your own understanding". Be stupid. Don't study ecosystems. Don't explore realities without human beings. The Lord Your God does not want that.
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. John 3:16
Find the love of God here.
Audio, Gospel of John Chapter 1 AV h t t p://w w wDOTyoutubeDOTcom/watch?v=Ao4uaIjd3xs
lolol haha so scientists "admit" as opposed to discover things. gotcha. the secular world and its fleshy ways are out to get you !! If you don't know btw, Dinosaur bones are Satan's lies, planted by Old Scratch at the time of creation and propagated by the Jewish people throughout history. The world has paid dearly ever since. Please help and deny the existence of anything physical or actual. Yay God!
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. John 3:16
Find the love of God here.
Audio, Gospel of John Chapter 1 AV h t t p://w w wDOTyoutubeDOTcom/watch?v=Ao4uaIjd3xs
@1991rooney the best thing in case of science is....whole science was invented..literally by ..Christians...creationists...and IDrs.....even goddamn big bang theory was invented by catholic priest...:))):..not to mention other inventions and fields of science...theories..etc..:)))...btw..thanks to an creationist and ortodox christian Nikola Tesla..you can enjoy in all this technology today....;)))
@bonyoldbehind You cannot understand because you are spiritually dead and love darkness.
But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned. 1Corinthians 2:14
And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. John 3:19
@BereanBeacon1 what a stupid comment. You are the one dead inside and incapable of understanding the world...you blind yourself with an inaccurate interpretation of your own perceived beliefs! You have your own faith and worldview completely, utterly mixed up. It's so pitiful that you're so lost and blind it makes me want to weep for humanity.
That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth; And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father. Philippians 2:10,11
So just because it doesn't seem like an animal (regardless of species) should have a reproductive system advanced enough to allow live birth based on the time frame in which the animal lived, god exists... I don't get the correlation. Every generation has its overachievers. I personally don't think anyone should be as talented at technical skateboarding as Rodney Mullen, but he exists, therefore God had to have made him awesome, not his intense 30 year training regimen. Of course...
This video supposes that all evolution solely progresses from primitive to advanced. This is not true. Evolution simply favors that which gives an advantage (this is a over-simplification, for simplicity).To further my point, from evolution's view (don't confuse personification with creationism; it's for simplicity), there is no primitive or advanced traits, just those that function best for their purpose. "Primitive" and "Advanced" are names biologists use, not indicators of evolutionary state.
@schoons27 What you just wrote is based solely on science fiction and not real science, which Creationists are very interested in. No evolutionary biologist would present this in a public debate under scientific guidelines.
@BereanBeacon1 That is a terrible counter-argument. It's like saying "Because I said so" to disprove a point. Try again, because I'm not convinced. And this isn't a public debate, this is youtube, and this is the argument I'm using, so disprove it. - schoons27
@BereanBeacon1 lol WHAT in the world are you talking about? What schoonz27 just said is exactly what ALL evolutionary biologists have agreed upon for generations. It is mainstream and accepted science that evolution has no "progression" towards "higher" forms, only specialization for different environments which can be a gain or a loss of characteristics. A banana slug and a shark are "equally evolved," just for different purposes. All science agrees with this.
@BereanBeacon1 lol WHAT in the world are you talking about? What schoonz27 just said is exactly what ALL evolutionary biologists have agreed upon for generations. It is mainstream and accepted science that evolution has no "progression" towards "higher" forms, only specialization for different environments which can be a gain or a loss of characteristics. A banana slug and a shark are "equally evolved," just for different purposes. All science agrees with this.
@notcocaine All evolutionists have is hot air on the mostly anonymous Internet. We have the real science backed up by the $10,000 Life Science Prize. You can evolve from a chicken and win the prize or make cowardly remarks on websites until you ultimately die and become a creationists after it's too late. My last remark to you is something that everyone understands: CLUCK, CLUCK
what did this have to do with evolution? you just ignored all the facts and said that it only works if god did it... despite having no evidence whatsoever.
@BereanBeacon1 interesting that someone who believes in creation would say that. Can you think of a single scientific theory, fact, or law that would be considered 'science fiction'? Then you would also need to give me the 'real science' alternative. By the way ' god did it' isn't real science
I was directed to this video from a video about actual science and biology. All that I wanted was to watch an interesting video about fish taxonomy, and this caught my attention. If I wanted crap about the bible, I'd go to one of your needlessly tax-exempt churches. I have no big problem with religions, as long as they don't try to push their dogma on other people. Trying to pretend that religion is science is ignorant, pathetic, and quite irritating.
This makes me worry about the state of the world that in this day and age people don't believe the theory of evolution (a theory in the same way that the theory of gravity is a theory or the theory of relativity, i.e. verifiable consistent fact) because it contradicts a story book.
Haha, the VIOLENCE OF THE GENESIS FLOOD and THE CARING CREATOR. He cared so much he gave the placoderm a uterus, but he cared too much and had to kill almost everything with a massive, VIOLENT FLOOD.
I love it. Creationists pick and choose which animal groups to support their "science," but ignore the more complete fossil records of other animals. "What? We don't have a complete fossil record? IT MUST BE JEEBUS!"
The way you reached such a conclusion baffles me as I am unable to follow along with the "logic" of a raving lune. To battle logical scientific arguments you must first produce reasonable a hypothesis and then you must provide evidence to support your theory. What you have just done contains neither of the two as Santa Claus and Harry Potter's ancient equivalent magically creating things out of nothing is nonsense.
Religion has no place in the study of natural history. It belongs in anthropology, and psychology. When it tries to compete with science, it just seems silly, and it makes its advocates seem mentally-challenged. The beauty of its poetry is ruined by its obsessive and inappropriate application outside of church. Intrusion of religious fantasy into public science-education runs counter to the survival necessities of a high-tech civilization in crisis, and practical tolerance wears thin.
Lastly, it does not disprove OR prove evolution. It is simply another piece to the puzzle. Since finding fossils containing the reproductive organs in tact is extremely rare, it is a specific aspect of evolution for which there is little information available to go on.
We can only work with what we've got. Assigning magic as the answer simply doesn't answer anything.
This fossil doesn't "baffle evolutionists". No where in any report about this fossil does it say anything remotely close to that. "Remarkably advanced" certainly does not scientifically equate to "OMG WTF!!"
If it were due to the impossible flood you propose, why does the dating on the fossil AND layers of earth it was found in coincide? You're off on the supposed age by a margin of 60,000 to 1 (or more!)
Such fossils are rare, which is why its most commonly ONLY found in current life.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Oh, I do love the conjecture Mr. Taylor puts forth with no verifiable sources ever cited. Science adapts and changes ideas when new evidence comes forth. Creation-science keeps the same idea and skews and bashes what doesn't fit.
Still metallurgical engineering takes some brain power.
I have no Idea what a evolutional year is , I assume it is the time it takes on species to become another. A total impossabilaty with what we no know about dna.
there is a vast difference between biology and metallurgy
and speciation ("the evolutionary process by which new biological species arise") is well documented, openly discussed and fits in quite nicely with our current understanding of how DNA functions.
@wheresthebody "there is a vast difference between biology and metallurgy"
What's your degree in? And did you know that Ian Taylor is not doing Creation Moments by himself? There is at least a PhD Physical Biochemistry on the CM staff.
The people who thumb you down aren't here to learn, they're here to argue and tenderize their lord-loin. Or better yet, start a "debate" with you with the sole intention of obfuscating your every water tight point solely with the hopes of frustrating you into "submission".
Of course! The evidence proves that this species of fish went extinct when the great flood buried every last one of them in mud! It's so obvious that a caring creator lovingly crafted each of them before violently killing them in the blink of an eye!
On another note: what the hell is an "evolutionary year"? Just how long do evolutionists think a year lasts?
FrankLightheart 1 week ago
religious people are hilarious
Migue261 1 month ago 2
Those blinded by pride cannot see the TRUTH of God's word. 2012, we will lead America back to the flock.
Odysseus154 2 months ago
at 0:30 - please tell me how that's not a turtle?
eagleeye1975 3 months ago
Okay, just because there were more 'advanced' fish so far back does NOT prove creationism, in fact, you're actually proving evolution. Evolution does mean 'the evolutionary advancement of a species'. If that was the case, how come coelocanths and worms are still alive while such advanced animals as dinosaurs (not birds, I'm referring to their relatives) or certain prehistoric mammals died off? And if it did prove creationism, how come there are no 400 million year old human remains?
scorpiopede 4 months ago
what are evolutionary years??
ptango666 4 months ago
@ptango666 I know! Just what is he saying? Is he trying to imply that "evolutionists" think years last longer than they actually do? Or that they think years are shorter?
He needs to make another video explaining how long evolutionists think a year is. Just for clarification.
FrankLightheart 1 week ago
This is what creates ignorant religious zealots...
MedicateOrHate 5 months ago
ok and now show me the evidence for your Jewish zombie king theory and lets see which has a more scientific grounding
n2488 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Everything this video discusses is direct evidence in favor of evolution, fits in 100% perfectly with the expectations of evolution research and backs up existing evolutionary ideas. It's amazing how shamelessly creationists are willing to lie to attack scientific facts that they falsely believe go against their faith...plenty of scientists, including Darwin, believe to varying degrees in a creator. and you can't study science without seeing evolution for yourself.
Scythemantis 5 months ago
Everything this video discusses is direct evidence in favor of evolution, fits in 100% perfectly with the expectations of evolution research and backs up existing evolutionary ideas. It's amazing how shamelessly creationists are willing to lie to attack scientific facts that they falsely believe go against their faith...plenty of scientists, including Darwin, believe to varying degrees in a creator. and you can't study science without seeing evolution for yourself.
Scythemantis 5 months ago
lol WHAT? None of this "baffles" evolutionists. In fact, nothing "baffles" evolution science at all. Evolution is rock-solid with none of the holes or flaws that crackpot conspiracy theorists claim there to be. Every single discovery in the natural world has fit together perfectly with our understanding of evolution, not a single fossil or species ever out of place. We can even use evolution to PREDICT where we will find new creatures and exactly the sort of forms they will take.
Scythemantis 5 months ago
How fucking stupid are these bastards, religion is a test alright, believe it and you know you've failed at life.
nilbud 6 months ago
@nilbud The Good Test - h t t p://w w wDOTyoutubeDOTcom/watch?v=7JiESHIYIJg
BereanBeacon1 6 months ago
what a low life attempt to throw religion in my face...
AmeriSkunk 6 months ago
@AmeriSkunk For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. John 3:16
Find the love of God here.
Audio, Gospel of John Chapter 1 AV h t t p://w w wDOTyoutubeDOTcom/watch?v=Ao4uaIjd3xs
BereanBeacon1 6 months ago
@BereanBeacon1 whether or not God loves the world and sacrificed his son for us....life evolved. It maybe God designed and controlled evolution, but any way you slice it, we can observe in every conceivable manner that Earth is millions of years old and all life descended from a common ancestry. If the bible conflicts with these facts, it proves the bible fallable because these facts can be SEEN to be the reality.
Scythemantis 5 months ago
Remember kids, don't think. The Bible says "Lean not on your own understanding". Be stupid. Don't study ecosystems. Don't explore realities without human beings. The Lord Your God does not want that.
TheGreaterGood80 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheGreaterGood80 Thank you.
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. John 3:16
Find the love of God here.
Audio, Gospel of John Chapter 1 AV h t t p://w w wDOTyoutubeDOTcom/watch?v=Ao4uaIjd3xs
BereanBeacon1 6 months ago
lolol haha so scientists "admit" as opposed to discover things. gotcha. the secular world and its fleshy ways are out to get you !! If you don't know btw, Dinosaur bones are Satan's lies, planted by Old Scratch at the time of creation and propagated by the Jewish people throughout history. The world has paid dearly ever since. Please help and deny the existence of anything physical or actual. Yay God!
BuffaloSoul1 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@BuffaloSoul1 Thank you.
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. John 3:16
Find the love of God here.
Audio, Gospel of John Chapter 1 AV h t t p://w w wDOTyoutubeDOTcom/watch?v=Ao4uaIjd3xs
BereanBeacon1 7 months ago
Fascinating.
xxxxxxx6xxxxxxx 8 months ago
you wouldn't get advice from a bricklayer if you needed to cook a roast, so why on earth would a creationist spout off about evolution????
51m0n77 8 months ago
what is this I don't even
Twilightmia 8 months ago
Even-though religion exists a lot longer than science, it's really science who has become the most mature one of the two.
1991rooney 9 months ago
@1991rooney Real science is great, but science fiction (evolution) yields nothing.
BereanBeacon1 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@1991rooney Do you know about the free gift of God?
BereanBeacon1 9 months ago
@1991rooney the best thing in case of science is....whole science was invented..literally by ..Christians...creationists...and IDrs.....even goddamn big bang theory was invented by catholic priest...:))):..not to mention other inventions and fields of science...theories..etc..:)))...btw..thanks to an creationist and ortodox christian Nikola Tesla..you can enjoy in all this technology today....;)))
giska1000 9 months ago
Surely this is satyrical?
bonyoldbehind 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@bonyoldbehind You cannot understand because you are spiritually dead and love darkness.
But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned. 1Corinthians 2:14
And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. John 3:19
BereanBeacon1 9 months ago
@BereanBeacon1 what a stupid comment. You are the one dead inside and incapable of understanding the world...you blind yourself with an inaccurate interpretation of your own perceived beliefs! You have your own faith and worldview completely, utterly mixed up. It's so pitiful that you're so lost and blind it makes me want to weep for humanity.
Scythemantis 5 months ago
such a caring creator to kill her and her pup during childbirth
watami10 9 months ago
that guy was a douche. church is gay
Pimp420of360 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Pimp420of360 Your time is near.
That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth; And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father. Philippians 2:10,11
BereanBeacon1 10 months ago
So just because it doesn't seem like an animal (regardless of species) should have a reproductive system advanced enough to allow live birth based on the time frame in which the animal lived, god exists... I don't get the correlation. Every generation has its overachievers. I personally don't think anyone should be as talented at technical skateboarding as Rodney Mullen, but he exists, therefore God had to have made him awesome, not his intense 30 year training regimen. Of course...
calumteine2008 10 months ago
lol
ArubaSailing 10 months ago
This video supposes that all evolution solely progresses from primitive to advanced. This is not true. Evolution simply favors that which gives an advantage (this is a over-simplification, for simplicity).To further my point, from evolution's view (don't confuse personification with creationism; it's for simplicity), there is no primitive or advanced traits, just those that function best for their purpose. "Primitive" and "Advanced" are names biologists use, not indicators of evolutionary state.
schoons27 10 months ago
@schoons27 What you just wrote is based solely on science fiction and not real science, which Creationists are very interested in. No evolutionary biologist would present this in a public debate under scientific guidelines.
BereanBeacon1 10 months ago
@BereanBeacon1 That is a terrible counter-argument. It's like saying "Because I said so" to disprove a point. Try again, because I'm not convinced. And this isn't a public debate, this is youtube, and this is the argument I'm using, so disprove it. - schoons27
schoons27 10 months ago
@BereanBeacon1 lol WHAT in the world are you talking about? What schoonz27 just said is exactly what ALL evolutionary biologists have agreed upon for generations. It is mainstream and accepted science that evolution has no "progression" towards "higher" forms, only specialization for different environments which can be a gain or a loss of characteristics. A banana slug and a shark are "equally evolved," just for different purposes. All science agrees with this.
Scythemantis 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@BereanBeacon1 lol WHAT in the world are you talking about? What schoonz27 just said is exactly what ALL evolutionary biologists have agreed upon for generations. It is mainstream and accepted science that evolution has no "progression" towards "higher" forms, only specialization for different environments which can be a gain or a loss of characteristics. A banana slug and a shark are "equally evolved," just for different purposes. All science agrees with this.
Scythemantis 5 months ago
creationist are lying freaks....
notcocaine 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@notcocaine All evolutionists have is hot air on the mostly anonymous Internet. We have the real science backed up by the $10,000 Life Science Prize. You can evolve from a chicken and win the prize or make cowardly remarks on websites until you ultimately die and become a creationists after it's too late. My last remark to you is something that everyone understands: CLUCK, CLUCK
BereanBeacon1 11 months ago
what did this have to do with evolution? you just ignored all the facts and said that it only works if god did it... despite having no evidence whatsoever.
oh well, par for the course Im finding
floyd316 11 months ago
@floyd316 You probably are so used to science fiction from evolutionists, that you are unable to recognize real science.
BereanBeacon1 11 months ago
@BereanBeacon1 interesting that someone who believes in creation would say that. Can you think of a single scientific theory, fact, or law that would be considered 'science fiction'? Then you would also need to give me the 'real science' alternative. By the way ' god did it' isn't real science
floyd316 11 months ago
I think i have just the word for this......WHAT?
TheHottygirl13 11 months ago
hahahaaha im sorry but ur pathetic..
i cant actually believe that some people think that way
romariosmith7 1 year ago
I was directed to this video from a video about actual science and biology. All that I wanted was to watch an interesting video about fish taxonomy, and this caught my attention. If I wanted crap about the bible, I'd go to one of your needlessly tax-exempt churches. I have no big problem with religions, as long as they don't try to push their dogma on other people. Trying to pretend that religion is science is ignorant, pathetic, and quite irritating.
10percentAtheist 1 year ago 4
hahahah what?
Ratama 1 year ago
mmm if you dont believe in evolution you must not like frogs,dragonflys and butterflys then,because they are wonderful examples of evolution......
and hey i believe in god ,but i believe evolution was the will of god....you dont have to separate god and science ..shaantii my friends =]
furikuridude 1 year ago
This makes me worry about the state of the world that in this day and age people don't believe the theory of evolution (a theory in the same way that the theory of gravity is a theory or the theory of relativity, i.e. verifiable consistent fact) because it contradicts a story book.
cokroache 1 year ago
Right the church is right!!!!! like the Salem Witch triassl!!! those bitches doing black magic of course!!! -_-
QuickScopeWeegee 1 year ago 9
lulz
buckamoona 1 year ago
I BELIEVE IN GOD! <3 ! <3 !
1radash 1 year ago
Haha, the VIOLENCE OF THE GENESIS FLOOD and THE CARING CREATOR. He cared so much he gave the placoderm a uterus, but he cared too much and had to kill almost everything with a massive, VIOLENT FLOOD.
I love it. Creationists pick and choose which animal groups to support their "science," but ignore the more complete fossil records of other animals. "What? We don't have a complete fossil record? IT MUST BE JEEBUS!"
0zwy 1 year ago 3
Bovine manure.
ostbagen 1 year ago
looks like a groudon lol
TheMrsofakingfresh 1 year ago
The way you reached such a conclusion baffles me as I am unable to follow along with the "logic" of a raving lune. To battle logical scientific arguments you must first produce reasonable a hypothesis and then you must provide evidence to support your theory. What you have just done contains neither of the two as Santa Claus and Harry Potter's ancient equivalent magically creating things out of nothing is nonsense.
kryp10yt 1 year ago
it shows evidence of propaganda by the theist empire trying to get in people's wallets. why don't theists question this?
mamushi72sai5575 1 year ago 2
Bitch please. Even a 7 year old knows your full of shit.
AdmiralCasey18 1 year ago
Hahah fail
ElectricalNoises 1 year ago 2
Religion has no place in the study of natural history. It belongs in anthropology, and psychology. When it tries to compete with science, it just seems silly, and it makes its advocates seem mentally-challenged. The beauty of its poetry is ruined by its obsessive and inappropriate application outside of church. Intrusion of religious fantasy into public science-education runs counter to the survival necessities of a high-tech civilization in crisis, and practical tolerance wears thin.
FatherChrismas 1 year ago 46
@FatherChrismas oh yeah? go watch reveiling gods treasure-noahs ark them we see whos silly
DaFloonz 8 months ago
Enjoyed the video until the bible spam...
Believing in god is for gullable children and old people.
FlamingMonkeysss 1 year ago 2
what about it being killed by mud. is that evidence of a caring creator? lol.
Pelonetillo 1 year ago
Creation : 232,323,676,4343
Evolution : 0
Likwidlyric 2 years ago
Care to name one credible piece of evidence that proves creationism?
Don't worry, I'll wait.
pokerslut530 2 years ago 2
Im sure you can watch all BB's videos, and still believe your evolution fantasy...which is fine. I cant force the blind to see.
Likwidlyric 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Care to name one credible piece of evidence that proves creationism or maybe one piece of evidence refuting evolution?
Until then, stop asserting we're "believing" anything. Do you "believe" the sun exists?
pokerslut530 2 years ago
Lastly, it does not disprove OR prove evolution. It is simply another piece to the puzzle. Since finding fossils containing the reproductive organs in tact is extremely rare, it is a specific aspect of evolution for which there is little information available to go on.
We can only work with what we've got. Assigning magic as the answer simply doesn't answer anything.
pokerslut530 2 years ago
This fossil doesn't "baffle evolutionists". No where in any report about this fossil does it say anything remotely close to that. "Remarkably advanced" certainly does not scientifically equate to "OMG WTF!!"
If it were due to the impossible flood you propose, why does the dating on the fossil AND layers of earth it was found in coincide? You're off on the supposed age by a margin of 60,000 to 1 (or more!)
Such fossils are rare, which is why its most commonly ONLY found in current life.
pokerslut530 2 years ago
Oh my they link to such a pornographic source. Shame on you Beacon!!!
"... this was the earliest evidence of vertebrates having sex by copulation — not just spawning in water, but sex that was fun."
GASP!!
I can debunk this so easily though: Fun isn't allowed by GOD thus breaking the creation theory in itself. That was way too easy.
/s
pokerslut530 2 years ago
This is so stupid I don't know where to begin....
teygrxx 2 years ago
@teygrxx You think dead fish are stupid?
tzephon 2 years ago
These are great little clips, very interesting. God bless you for sharing.
vivienlizzie1 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Oh, I do love the conjecture Mr. Taylor puts forth with no verifiable sources ever cited. Science adapts and changes ideas when new evidence comes forth. Creation-science keeps the same idea and skews and bashes what doesn't fit.
Websites of your sources, please?
bailesie 2 years ago
The reason evolutionary scientists have to keep changing their story is so to accomadate their premise that all life had a commom ancestor.
The biblical model does not need to be changed at all because it's true and the scienctific evidence already supports it.
fellowservant34 2 years ago
creationmoments . com There is also a reference listed on the sidebar to the right.
tzephon 2 years ago
Praise the Creator Jesus Christ
WarriorPriest28 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
whats an "evolutionary year"?
i get the feeling that the host of this show is an idiot
wheresthebody 2 years ago
@wheresthebody
I understand you want to question this vid, but please stop being rude.
walkman06 2 years ago 2
The idiot has a dagree in biology , do you?
hellavadeal 2 years ago 2
Who has a "dagree in biology"?
Atriviality 2 years ago
@hellavadeal ian taylor does not have a degree in biology, he has a degree in metallurgical engineering
and tell me what an "evolutionary year" is
wheresthebody 2 years ago
I was mistakin my bad. I could not find the info .
I have no Idea what an evolutional year is Hahaha
hellavadeal 2 years ago
@hellavadeal How long does it take to get a bachelor's dagree?
BeauIXI 1 year ago
@BeauIXI Is time a factor in intelligence?
hellavadeal 1 year ago
@hellavadeal Not if all you require is faith. (sorry, I had to)
BeauIXI 1 year ago
@BeauIXI - Long enough to learn to spell "degree" I would imagine..
bigexodus 1 year ago
i get the feeling you don't know the host of this show
SounzNice 2 years ago
Thought it was someone else .
Still metallurgical engineering takes some brain power.
I have no Idea what a evolutional year is , I assume it is the time it takes on species to become another. A total impossabilaty with what we no know about dna.
hellavadeal 2 years ago
there is a vast difference between biology and metallurgy
and speciation ("the evolutionary process by which new biological species arise") is well documented, openly discussed and fits in quite nicely with our current understanding of how DNA functions.
just look it up, its really fascinating stuff!
wheresthebody 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@wheresthebody "there is a vast difference between biology and metallurgy"
What's your degree in? And did you know that Ian Taylor is not doing Creation Moments by himself? There is at least a PhD Physical Biochemistry on the CM staff.
tzephon 2 years ago
@tzephon what is an evolutionary year?
wheresthebody 2 years ago
Is that an answer to my question?
tzephon 2 years ago
@tzephon i didnt think you would be able to tell me, because its not a real term!
these people make shit up to fool morons
wheresthebody 2 years ago
I didn't think you could tell me what you have a degree in either. Because you make shit up to fool morons.
tzephon 2 years ago
Comment removed
mifster83 2 years ago
@wheresthebody wheresthebody of Jesus Christ?
0871368021 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
" what's an "evolutionary year"? i get the feeling that the host of this show is an idiot "
I concur!
Sadly, they've thumbs downed your comment into oblivion. So, let's resurrect it.... through the POWER OF SPAGHETTI!
There, your comment has been HEALED! Don't forget to tithe! ;)
pokerslut530 2 years ago 2
thanks for the efforts, but sometimes this feels like showing card tricks to a dog
wheresthebody 2 years ago
For sure.
The people who thumb you down aren't here to learn, they're here to argue and tenderize their lord-loin. Or better yet, start a "debate" with you with the sole intention of obfuscating your every water tight point solely with the hopes of frustrating you into "submission".
You gotta love their voracity!
pokerslut530 2 years ago