Added: 2 years ago
From: motivealloy
Views: 63,854
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (35)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I thought pornos are not allowed on Youtube

  • From what we can see on this vid, the car looks like the 7 liter GT MK 2, the black

    car n° 2 that gave FORD their first Le Mans victory in 1966, apart from exhausts which were much bigger. In any case my all time fav of all gt 40 versions.

  • @BrettMayaAllisonTory yup it is a MK II

  • im i the only one that thought it was on before it was on?

  • if this at a car show witch one because i've gone to mrytle beach mustang week evrey year sense 2009 and went to Ocean City in 2011

  • Better looking than a modern GT40... doesn't have that god-awful rear bumper bolted onto it.

  • @flaagan THERE IS NO MODERN GT40!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! your thinking of the Ford GT believe me there is a HUGE difference...

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @sixtiesforever1966 The Superformance cars are actually licensed continuation models,so technically they ARE real GT 40's. The company built the molds and fixtures to original late model specs and drawings instead of using Safir molds,so they're actually better than the originals as well.There's a nice one driving around woodside,and a superformance store in Redwood City as well.I got a good look at the cars there,and a lot of good info as well. Excellent quality cars.

  • I like the Mk.1 replica better.

  • Comment removed

  • Too much muffler. . .

  • @Cash2112 boring low-rev energine

  • I've got one of those..........well..........i­n slot car form anyway. The headlights work though, so it's almost real, right? :(

  • Big money.

  • Comment removed

  • this is actually the Ford GT Roush. Sound awesome like nothing!!!

  • No, that's a GT40 replica with a Roush engine.

  • @maxmc89 not a replica, it's more properly considered a continuation as they continued the VIN numbers for the Superformance versions. They are supposedly 85% as built originally.

  • @maxmc89 hence the"superformance"

  • @beebo777 mine wasn't a general comment, it was a response to a guy who thought it was a "Roush GT"

  • @maxmc89 um wtf how wud u know?

  • @david1991rules4life by the sound

  • @maxmc89 yer but still the body is the exact same.

  • @david1991rules4life 1st off thats not how the original looked and super performance is a kit car company. look it up.

  • As a rolling chasis I beleive around $70,000. I am currently looking to purchase one.

  • Why the smoke when it starts?

  • Its not smoke, its steam because there was water in the muffler, then when it started the heat vaporized the water

  • Around how much did that superformance gt40 run ya ?

  • I think they run around 150 thousand.

  • 70K for the rolling chassis (no motor)

  • Hmm, even better than what I thought it would be.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more