yeah ofcourse there was explosions in it from all the natural gas they use for cooking and water heating. every apartment there has atleast 3 gas outlets for hot water and cooking 2 in the kitchen one in the bathroom.
nope i wasn't and no you are right that their isnt apratments in wtc. lol. how could you possibly conclude i was when i mentioned kitchens and bedrooms?
no i was just commenting on how asian residential building high rises are equiped and why there would be explosions when one caught on fire. ( i lived in one for a year).
Lets not get overly dramatic? 3000 people lost their lives b/c our nation was attacked. And all you people can talk about is some insane theory of how this is a billioniare's scheme to trick the insurance companies for a few more billions. If this is a scheme to steal some money then it's one of the dumbest and most expensive way to do so. Sacrafice 3000 lives and collapse the stock market as a result? Isn't their a more discrete way for a billionaire to make a few more billions? What's the ROI?
I don't think "designed to take significant sideways forces that rarely happen" includes falling debris from 2 100+ story steel structure collapsing next door. I'm not saying I trust the government 100%, but if you absolutely trust this conspiracy theory with 100% confidence that WTC 7 was not brought down by the the complication of 2 massive steel structure violently crashing down into lower Manhatten and pushing debris into the sea, then you are not considering all options.
When he said "I remember getting a call from the fire department commander, uh, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it"
R U sure "it" does not mean the rescue operation? If he was giving the order to demolish the building, why does he refer to preventing the further loss of life? R u sure u r 100% right? If u r even 1% wrong u r spitting on peoples graves
No one is spitting on anyone's grave, tom. Let's not get overly dramatic here, OK?
WTC7 had only 1 or 2 small minor fires, compared to the massive destruction plainly evident in the towers. I don't recall hearing of ANY rescue operations in WTC7, do you? But, I remember hearing of LOTS of rescue operations responding to the twin towers.
So, I'm quite certain "it" does NOT refer to a non-existant rescue operation at WTC7. I dont recall hearing of any casuaties coming from WTC7, do u?
@CincinnatiGifts Type in your Youtube comment bar ; Bijlmer Crash october 4, 1992
In this year an Israeleian frightplane crashed into a building. Part of the building is stil standing till today ! Despite the building was even weaker than WTC7.
It took me a while trying to figure out what the hell you are talking about. Nope I absolutely HATE the DAWGS and couldn't care less b/c I was sun tanning in a beach in the Carribean. Besides, I can care less between 2 redneck teams.
@tomkwc please consider that there were 2 buildings - one on each side of the building 7 - that didn't have enough damage to make them collapse; also there were 2 more WTC buildings straight beneath the towers (buildings 6 and 5) which albeit the really heavy damage, stood still for i think a month till they were literally pulled. in fact the only buildings that collapsed in NY that day, were in WTC complex. none of the buildings around them had such a severe and irreparable damages.
Why did other buildings that were in closer proximity to the twin towers not collapse before or after or to this day, since WTC7 fell? Steel framed Mariot WTC did not collapse. The debris from the first tower damaged it significantly, the second tower did extreme damage but part of the building stood. Had to be later demolished, as did 6, 5 and 4. WTC7 was across the road from 5 and 6. Remember? and then behind 5 and 6 relative to 7, stood the twin towers.
Slam a jet into the skeleton of this building to take out part of the structure and I assure you it will collapse by the weight from above along with the fire weakening the steel.
WTC-7 was not hit by a plane, it caught fire from debris from the towers. It was just a regular fire, no jet fuel, no bar joist floor beams, just a regular high rise fire in a building with working fire sprinklers. It was a lot less intense than this Beijing Fire. Yet it collapsed into itself for three of three at the NYC Trade Center. Three of three that are the only three cases. Yes, two hit by planes, but not WTC-7, which was no different from fires like the one in Beijing.
Ever played Jenga? Take out a crucial piece at the bottom of the structure and see what it does to the rest. Sometimes, all it takes is 1or 2 columns to create a domino effect.
No, I haven't heard of the game, it sounds fun. Steel frame structures, however, are not like games where you can pull out a piece. They are welded and bolted together with carefully designed joints designed to take significant sideways forces that rarely happen. In addition they are designed with redundancy so they can lose a column or two without catastrophic results.
This is a massive fire. The temperatures must have been close to 2500ºF in places. This fire raged for hours, consuming the entire building, from the ground floor to the penthouse. Did this building collapse? Of course not. Modern steel high rise buildings do not collapse because of fires, even ones as intense and as long-lasting as this, or the Madrid hotel fire. Compare this raging inferno, aided by quantities of fireworks, to the small, isolated localized fires in WTC 7.
MASSIVE FIRE. NO COLLAPSE. PERIOD.
9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB
MeatVision 1 year ago 2
Did it collapse yet?
9/11 Truth. Get informed.
JDSabre 1 year ago
yeah ofcourse there was explosions in it from all the natural gas they use for cooking and water heating. every apartment there has atleast 3 gas outlets for hot water and cooking 2 in the kitchen one in the bathroom.
halburd1 2 years ago
Are we talking about the WTC buldings? If so, there were NO apartments in the WTC buildings.
CincinnatiGifts 2 years ago
nope i wasn't and no you are right that their isnt apratments in wtc. lol. how could you possibly conclude i was when i mentioned kitchens and bedrooms?
halburd1 2 years ago
no i was just commenting on how asian residential building high rises are equiped and why there would be explosions when one caught on fire. ( i lived in one for a year).
halburd1 2 years ago
YEAHHH !!!! REM KOOLHAAS RULES
mondeonero 2 years ago
Lets not get overly dramatic? 3000 people lost their lives b/c our nation was attacked. And all you people can talk about is some insane theory of how this is a billioniare's scheme to trick the insurance companies for a few more billions. If this is a scheme to steal some money then it's one of the dumbest and most expensive way to do so. Sacrafice 3000 lives and collapse the stock market as a result? Isn't their a more discrete way for a billionaire to make a few more billions? What's the ROI?
tomkwc 2 years ago
I don't think "designed to take significant sideways forces that rarely happen" includes falling debris from 2 100+ story steel structure collapsing next door. I'm not saying I trust the government 100%, but if you absolutely trust this conspiracy theory with 100% confidence that WTC 7 was not brought down by the the complication of 2 massive steel structure violently crashing down into lower Manhatten and pushing debris into the sea, then you are not considering all options.
tomkwc 2 years ago
The owner of the WTC complex, Larry Silverstein, admitted that WTC7 was "pulled", as in a controlled demolition.
CincinnatiGifts 2 years ago
When he said "I remember getting a call from the fire department commander, uh, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it"
R U sure "it" does not mean the rescue operation? If he was giving the order to demolish the building, why does he refer to preventing the further loss of life? R u sure u r 100% right? If u r even 1% wrong u r spitting on peoples graves
tomkwc 2 years ago
No one is spitting on anyone's grave, tom. Let's not get overly dramatic here, OK?
WTC7 had only 1 or 2 small minor fires, compared to the massive destruction plainly evident in the towers. I don't recall hearing of ANY rescue operations in WTC7, do you? But, I remember hearing of LOTS of rescue operations responding to the twin towers.
So, I'm quite certain "it" does NOT refer to a non-existant rescue operation at WTC7. I dont recall hearing of any casuaties coming from WTC7, do u?
CincinnatiGifts 2 years ago 3
@CincinnatiGifts Type in your Youtube comment bar ; Bijlmer Crash october 4, 1992
In this year an Israeleian frightplane crashed into a building. Part of the building is stil standing till today ! Despite the building was even weaker than WTC7.
Please Reply.
etiennealive 1 year ago
Tomkwc you are one of them dudes that lays out on his couch half naked and drunk as shit screaming at the cowboys huh?
SMASHER1099 2 years ago
It took me a while trying to figure out what the hell you are talking about. Nope I absolutely HATE the DAWGS and couldn't care less b/c I was sun tanning in a beach in the Carribean. Besides, I can care less between 2 redneck teams.
tomkwc 2 years ago
@tomkwc please consider that there were 2 buildings - one on each side of the building 7 - that didn't have enough damage to make them collapse; also there were 2 more WTC buildings straight beneath the towers (buildings 6 and 5) which albeit the really heavy damage, stood still for i think a month till they were literally pulled. in fact the only buildings that collapsed in NY that day, were in WTC complex. none of the buildings around them had such a severe and irreparable damages.
arashdalir 1 year ago
Why did other buildings that were in closer proximity to the twin towers not collapse before or after or to this day, since WTC7 fell? Steel framed Mariot WTC did not collapse. The debris from the first tower damaged it significantly, the second tower did extreme damage but part of the building stood. Had to be later demolished, as did 6, 5 and 4. WTC7 was across the road from 5 and 6. Remember? and then behind 5 and 6 relative to 7, stood the twin towers.
Bankers Trust decided to stand proud
mattmatt115 1 year ago
Slam a jet into the skeleton of this building to take out part of the structure and I assure you it will collapse by the weight from above along with the fire weakening the steel.
tomkwc 3 years ago
That theory has long been disputed, by many structural engineers and professionas
CincinnatiGifts 3 years ago
WTC-7 was not hit by a plane, it caught fire from debris from the towers. It was just a regular fire, no jet fuel, no bar joist floor beams, just a regular high rise fire in a building with working fire sprinklers. It was a lot less intense than this Beijing Fire. Yet it collapsed into itself for three of three at the NYC Trade Center. Three of three that are the only three cases. Yes, two hit by planes, but not WTC-7, which was no different from fires like the one in Beijing.
idemandabetterfuture 2 years ago
Ever played Jenga? Take out a crucial piece at the bottom of the structure and see what it does to the rest. Sometimes, all it takes is 1or 2 columns to create a domino effect.
tomkwc 2 years ago
No, I haven't heard of the game, it sounds fun. Steel frame structures, however, are not like games where you can pull out a piece. They are welded and bolted together with carefully designed joints designed to take significant sideways forces that rarely happen. In addition they are designed with redundancy so they can lose a column or two without catastrophic results.
idemandabetterfuture 2 years ago
@tomkwc /watch?v=QyRLauk36uM
bongcouver 8 months ago
Let me guess, Mr. Silverstein didn't own this building.
DieselBikeBuilder 3 years ago
The scary thing is that people are so dumbed down they will still parrot the government.
aluckyshot 3 years ago
Our government wouldn't lie to us, would it??? Hehe
CincinnatiGifts 3 years ago
bloggulator, Man you are dead on! We were told the fire in WTC made those buildings fall! Are we that Naive ?
McStrong7377 3 years ago
This is a massive fire. The temperatures must have been close to 2500ºF in places. This fire raged for hours, consuming the entire building, from the ground floor to the penthouse. Did this building collapse? Of course not. Modern steel high rise buildings do not collapse because of fires, even ones as intense and as long-lasting as this, or the Madrid hotel fire. Compare this raging inferno, aided by quantities of fireworks, to the small, isolated localized fires in WTC 7.
bloggulator 3 years ago