@goitjay We saved Australia. We needed those weapons to save the world from the axis. Pigs like you obviously have the saddest knowledge ever seen to date. Shut your worthless mouth, please!
I think if Japaneses Army has develop new their tactic like their Navy did, their solider would have much better fighting change. their tactic still look the same one their used in China.
@SharkOoOo I'm not denying that compared to the European and American tanks, the Japanese tanks were less than impressive. I'm speaking from the viewpoint of a Marine infantryman. If it's impervious to your rifle, moves on tracks, tries to kill you with it's cannon and machine guns then it's a Tank. I have experience in these things. ;-) Semper Fidelis!
@MIT1369 Amen. If you have this huge machine coming towards you firing and everything that you shoot at it bounces off and it still seems to be coming towards you then I call that a tank whether by "Western standards" or not!!
@MIT1369 Not everyting that is "impervious to your rifle, moves on tracks, tries to kill you with it's cannon and machine guns" is a tank. There are also assault guns and tank destroyers. At first sight they look like tanks, but they aren't.
@MIT1369 Well, actually, Japanese tanks suffered lower than any other of the Second World War. Even more than the appalling Russian T-34! T-98 could easily be knocked out by simple anti-tank rifles of the period. Provided, we had tanks like the Sherman or M5 Stuart, the Japanese were doomed.
@SharkOoOo Thats a contradiction in terms how can you not call a tank a tank? Tank isn't even the real name for the machine it was just a cover name for the first british armoured tracked fighting vehicles. Which the japanese "tanks" were
I' can not bolive the stupit attack by the jap. force in the begining of the battle, that shows they had no respect for the US. solderds, but from Guadalcanal they had not lern noting
@pandzida98765 I dont have any doubt about bravery of men of japanese army but the tactics used by their commanders and the plans, communications, etc was very disastrous
So many lives lost and I am still not able to figure out why? Patriotism? To save the country or family? Or just to make weapon manufacturer rich?
goitjay 6 months ago
@goitjay We saved Australia. We needed those weapons to save the world from the axis. Pigs like you obviously have the saddest knowledge ever seen to date. Shut your worthless mouth, please!
Tyco200 2 months ago
I think if Japaneses Army has develop new their tactic like their Navy did, their solider would have much better fighting change. their tactic still look the same one their used in China.
aiaek 9 months ago
What a waste of men.
askjiir 10 months ago
japanese tank used in ww2 can not be called tank
SharkOoOo 1 year ago
@SharkOoOo
If you're an infantryman without an anti tank weapon it sure as heck CAN!
MIT1369 1 year ago
@MIT1369
maybe work in China Korea and other Asian countries, however when it against US or Red Army it is a piece of junk for sure
SharkOoOo 1 year ago
@SharkOoOo I'm not denying that compared to the European and American tanks, the Japanese tanks were less than impressive. I'm speaking from the viewpoint of a Marine infantryman. If it's impervious to your rifle, moves on tracks, tries to kill you with it's cannon and machine guns then it's a Tank. I have experience in these things. ;-) Semper Fidelis!
MIT1369 1 year ago
@MIT1369 Amen. If you have this huge machine coming towards you firing and everything that you shoot at it bounces off and it still seems to be coming towards you then I call that a tank whether by "Western standards" or not!!
edavismookie25 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MIT1369 Not everyting that is "impervious to your rifle, moves on tracks, tries to kill you with it's cannon and machine guns" is a tank. There are also assault guns and tank destroyers. At first sight they look like tanks, but they aren't.
xqtr74 1 year ago
@MIT1369 Well, actually, Japanese tanks suffered lower than any other of the Second World War. Even more than the appalling Russian T-34! T-98 could easily be knocked out by simple anti-tank rifles of the period. Provided, we had tanks like the Sherman or M5 Stuart, the Japanese were doomed.
Tyco200 2 months ago
@Tyco200
"Appaling" T-34 ???? That runs contrary to almost every historic conception.
askjiir 2 weeks ago
@SharkOoOo Thats a contradiction in terms how can you not call a tank a tank? Tank isn't even the real name for the machine it was just a cover name for the first british armoured tracked fighting vehicles. Which the japanese "tanks" were
moomoo1337 1 year ago
the japanese don't have very good communications with each other lol
shinichiBLUE 1 year ago
I' can not bolive the stupit attack by the jap. force in the begining of the battle, that shows they had no respect for the US. solderds, but from Guadalcanal they had not lern noting
majorRajn 2 years ago 2
fire bombs are the best way to get them out of caves.
davidiskool18 2 years ago
some of this film is from okinawa and the batle of blodynose ridge ,allmost none of it is from the "canal"
missqueencunt2 2 years ago
@missqueencunt2 Wasn't Bloody Ridge the high area by the Airstrip in the "Canal"?
JohnnyStorm2007 1 year ago
banzai!
21156590 2 years ago
I like Japanesee army.
pandzida98765 2 years ago
@pandzida98765 I dont have any doubt about bravery of men of japanese army but the tactics used by their commanders and the plans, communications, etc was very disastrous
rahulbond3m 7 months ago
At :55 Marines are using firebombs, where they that low on grenades ??
32silvercoins 2 years ago
great vid.. i am the first one to comment
wehrmachtR 2 years ago