Added: 2 years ago
From: HoustonGD
Views: 24,570
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (23)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • So many lives lost and I am still not able to figure out why? Patriotism? To save the country or family? Or just to make weapon manufacturer rich?

  • @goitjay We saved Australia. We needed those weapons to save the world from the axis. Pigs like you obviously have the saddest knowledge ever seen to date. Shut your worthless mouth, please!

  • I think if Japaneses Army has develop new their tactic like their Navy did, their solider would have much better fighting change. their tactic still look the same one their used in China.

  • What a waste of men.

  • japanese tank used in ww2 can not be called tank

  • @SharkOoOo

    If you're an infantryman without an anti tank weapon it sure as heck CAN!

  • @MIT1369

    maybe work in China Korea and other Asian countries, however when it against US or Red Army it is a piece of junk for sure

  • @SharkOoOo I'm not denying that compared to the European and American tanks, the Japanese tanks were less than impressive. I'm speaking from the viewpoint of a Marine infantryman. If it's impervious to your rifle, moves on tracks, tries to kill you with it's cannon and machine guns then it's a Tank. I have experience in these things. ;-) Semper Fidelis!

  • @MIT1369 Amen. If you have this huge machine coming towards you firing and everything that you shoot at it bounces off and it still seems to be coming towards you then I call that a tank whether by "Western standards" or not!!

  • @MIT1369 Well, actually, Japanese tanks suffered lower than any other of the Second World War. Even more than the appalling Russian T-34! T-98 could easily be knocked out by simple anti-tank rifles of the period. Provided, we had tanks like the Sherman or M5 Stuart, the Japanese were doomed.

  • @Tyco200

    "Appaling" T-34 ???? That runs contrary to almost every historic conception.

  • @SharkOoOo Thats a contradiction in terms how can you not call a tank a tank? Tank isn't even the real name for the machine it was just a cover name for the first british armoured tracked fighting vehicles. Which the japanese "tanks" were

  • the japanese don't have very good communications with each other lol

  • I' can not bolive the stupit attack by the jap. force in the begining of the battle, that shows they had no respect for the US. solderds, but from Guadalcanal they had not lern noting

  • fire bombs are the best way to get them out of caves.

  • some of this film is from okinawa and the batle of blodynose ridge ,allmost none of it is from the "canal"

  • @missqueencunt2 Wasn't Bloody Ridge the high area by the Airstrip in the "Canal"?

  • banzai!

  • I like Japanesee army.

  • @pandzida98765 I dont have any doubt about bravery of men of japanese army but the tactics used by their commanders and the plans, communications, etc was very disastrous

  • At :55 Marines are using firebombs, where they that low on grenades ??

  • great vid.. i am the first one to comment

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more