Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)
Link to this comment:
Share to:
Loading...
- Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
or sign in to load a different list.
Loading...Saving...
This has been flagged as spam show
I understand these are views of people who don't have a clue about the complexity of problems (in library operations) and hence requirement of an elaborated classification. The current schemes have been tested and evolved over the years.
But still, Kudos for this maverick idea; we would be able to get some feedbacks out of this. I'm eager to know the outcomes of this initiative after a sufficient time frame, may be an year or so.
tarunchaturvedi 3 years ago
I understand these are views of people who don't have a clue about the complexity of problems (in library operations) and hence requirement of an elaborated classification. The current schemes have been tested and evolved over the years.
But still, Kudos for this maverick idea; we would be able to get some feedbacks out of this. I'm eager to know the outcomes of this initiative after a sufficient time frame, may be an year or so.
tarunchaturvedi 3 years ago
I guess it helps make your point, but I'm not entirely sure that every Dewey supporter is as out of touch and neurotic as the people in this clip.
SatansParakeet 3 years ago
I love it!
mecasey67 3 years ago
Ok, maybe only a video a librarian could love. But hooray for thinking about classification from the user's point of view!
kgschneider 3 years ago