@TheAussie2012 Man can engineer molecules! It shows how it takes INTELLIGENCE in controlled laboratory conditions to mimic, manipulate, plagiarize a cell's Design! Scientists COPY genetic sequences!! They dont create anything!!
Its all Man made Synthetic chemistry! and it has nothing to do with the origin of life!! Homochirality is a disaster for any sort of naturalistic origins! There is no demonstrated source for such non-racemic mixture of sugars in any plausible pre-biotic environment!
Here is a question for the OP not related to the subject.... being that you cannot have space without time or time without space, DO you think that some day the human race, if we dont kill ourselves off by greedy agendas, will be able to time travel? It would seem to me that navigation of the necessary reference points for such a thing could be possible if we could ever nail down the exact time of the BANG! which may never happen!
A fourth-dimensional being could traverse this time continuum simply by going from point A to point B, because that being can perceive that dimension. The third-dimensional being cannot.
Its funny how this statement COMPLETELY correlates perfectly to the Bible when it says that God is EVERYWHERE PRESENT! Which even in the space time Continuum theory they say that a 4th dimensional being, can see a 3dim being but a 3 dim being cant see a 4thdim being!! So, Does this NOT PROVE GOD as possible?
@abeeftec Man can engineer molecules! It shows how it takes INTELLIGENCE in controlled laboratory conditions to mimic, manipulate, plagiarize a cell's Design! Scientists COPY genetic sequences!! They dont create anything!!
Its all Man made Synthetic chemistry! and it has nothing to do with the origin of life!! Homochirality is a disaster for any sort of naturalistic origins! There is no demonstrated source for such non-racemic mixture of sugars in any plausible pre-biotic environment!
Is it not a fact that Energy cannot be destroyed? Well then, what happens to YOU when you die? And, what form of energy were you before you were born?
Even in the space time continuum it is stated that...a dimension does not need to be detected to exist YET, You do NOT believe there is a God yet you believe there is a Fourth Dimension? Please tell me then, What exists inside the fourth dimension?
LOL! Again you attempt to take what they said in that statement as they dont use Logic Reason and believe in the scientific method! 1. The Scientific method is NOT perfect! 2. The scientific method WHEN DEALING WITH THE SUBJECT OF EVOLUTION, Scientists who are also atheists,Not all, but those who are have pushed things through the scientific method to make it fact when Evolution iS NOT FACT!! If you say it is then you lack all credibility in my book. You can say its LIKELY but NOT FACT!
Love that you think you KNOW that the fly changed 50 million years ago! Did you ever stop and think about the fact that God, in the last days, Would send a STRONG delusion that the unbelievers would continue to believe a LIE?? Did you Ever stop to think that God has the power to MAKE YOU NEVER BELIEVE IN HIM or MAKE YOU BELIEVE IN HIM? You better start BEGGING HIM TO SHOW YOU THE TRUTH!! Because once he shows you the truth, You can weed through BOTH sides and KNOW you know the truth!
HEY! Not that I agree with any of the Creationist museum stuff, But, How do you know how many Alleles there could be for any given gene after the flood? Can God not change whatever he wants whenever he wants? You fail to see that the one who makes the laws that govern what you know! KNOWS THE LAWS MADE THE LAWS AND CAN CHANGE THEM WITHOUT SEEKING YOUR APROVAL TO DO SO! Funny how you all love to claim what is possible and what is not yet you STILL Have no answer for the singularity of bigbang!
Can you please send me to the data from where you got your answer NO from? Because I see you speaking of DATA, And I see that you are throwing links up everywhere for people to click on to show them more on WORTHLESS informations, Yet when you speak of this DATA YOU ARE SO SURE OF..... NO LINK? Wheres the evidence? Why dont just one of you atheists ever put up links to prove your points? OH, because most of you are in this for the arguement and not the actual facts of it all!
The question you ask about IS IT GENETICALLY POSSIBLE TO START FROM 2 ANIMALS AND PRODUCE ON AVERAGE 100 SPECIES IN 400 YEARS? Number 1. Where did you get 400 years from? And 2. In my lifetime they have man has produced more breeds of dogs then before i was born! Thats only 40 years!! So, Man has figured out genetics and now he thinks he is more wise then God! So he figured out HOW God did it? Wow, sure doesnt prove there is no God!
I see in every question you raise that your big issue with God is HES MEAN!! And you ask the question, " Why would an all loving creator create mankind knowing he was going to throw them into Hell?" Nice Question but what you fail to see is that he did it for those he is redeeming! He does NOT LOVE those he is allowing to continue on their path to hell! Anyone who tells you otherwise and says they are a Christain doesnt read their Bible or may not even be a Real Christain! real PSALMS 5:5 11:5
And I guess since you found a Museum Called CREATIONIST MUSEUM, I GUESS that means that is what all christains believe? It is NOT in the Bible! That museum is mans way of trying to make sense of the fact that he doesnt have enough info to argue with one of you people! I will argue with you all because you are so dense you cant see that you just follow whatever man tells you to believe! If he has credentials from a school then he MUST be smart and to be listened to! thats what you thinK!
I love that you said, Since you cannot conceive it is possible, it must not be! Is that not how you feel about GOD? Since you cannot conceive God exists, IF he is a LOVING God, Then he must not be because there is so much suffering in the world!! funny thing is that is the reason you dont want to conceive of him! Because you dont agree that he lets people suffer! Well, In the same way, There is way more evidence for CREATION then there is for EVOLUTION! Our universe SCREAMS Intelligence!
Also, there is no MOUNTAIN of evidence that suggest everything evolved! Since the Internet has gotten so huge, Anyone can write anything and as long as the scientist says its so then its made fact! There is NOT mountains of evidence that PROVES evolution! There is ONLY speculative facts that COULD prove it, IF they could link them together.So they micro the theory by Mutations and call it proof of Macro! then add everything else and call it MOUNTAINS of evidence without anything linking them
You know I find it funny that you people think that the only way something can become fact is if a bunch of other people, called "peers" tell you its true! all of them! So, How many PEERS have to say it looks good before its considered TRUTH? Is it 7 out of 10? So are the other 3 who didnt agree stupid? OR does just one disagreeing make it false? IS he smarter then the other 9? LOL! You JUST dont get it that God will hide the truth from those who PERISH! Goes against GOD IS LOVE doesnt it?
It is hilarious that you Atheists believe that Mutations are Evolutionary PROOF! LOL! So, If a man is born with 4 fingers he has been born with traits from his past!! So, then if a man is born with an extra thumb then that is his FUTURE self somehow coming out in his birth? LOL!!!!! I laugh every time I hear this arguement! It is so funny! MILLIONS of years of evolution can happen in ONE BIRTH accidentally yet the rest will catch up in say, millions of years! total crap!
You atheists are shear morons! How on earth do you think that your precious evolution and big bang theory are facts is way beyond my thinking! How can you think that its THE TRUTH about how we came to be? Its speculation and just because Science embraces it does not make it the end all. Just because you think it is doesnt make it so!
I also love how you all, in every debate, have to tell the creationist he doesnt even know what evolution is! Its definition has been changed!
@seraph595 you refuse to believe that we evolved from primates but you're ok that we came from dirt? Well, maybe some day you'll be fully evolved into a monkey from your current state.
One Young-Earth Creationist says to another "Which is closer - the Moon or Mexico"? The other points at the Moon and replies "The Moon - Duh! You can't see Mexico from here".
The inconsistency is mind blowing. It's "amazing" how they are able to reconcile those facts. On the one hand they need the "random" accumulation of genetic differences by natural selection to explain Noah and speciation, on the other hand they must continue to convince themselves that evolution and common decent is not only not true, but the most ridicules idea ever.
The great thing about evolution is it happens whether you "believe" in it or not! I can accept evolution as truth, those poor religious folk have to "believe" in their god.
@TennisAnnalyst, your not searching hard enough if you think that observation and logic are all humanity has. And you didn't answer my question. Death is coming, are you prepared to take the Scientific Path when oblivion is staring you in the face? I wouldn't be ready, if for nothing else I would be a Christian because it teaches that we are not accidents, and designed to live forever. So what's your answer? What will you do when your time has come?
@seraph595 When oblivion stares at you, stare back. [See: Nietzsche]. Who needs ‘saving’ from death? Death is a natural process, inevitable as with the decay of any thermodynamic process and system in the universe.
It is not saving that you appear to desire, it is escape. Understand that science may well develop into technology which allows life extension or cybernetic immortality. Your faith may endure but science overcomes.
@TennisAnnalyst Observation and logic will get you only so far. Science cannot save you from death, and it cannot give you all the answers. Christianity alone can do both. Again, your studies give you what is at best an educated guess on the origin of life, and your deceiving yourself if you think its more than that. I reiterate, how will you save yourself from death?
@TennisAnnalyst, I believe you tennis. There is not a creationist out there that will say that natural selection and micro-evolution are not real(I believe in speciation, but others may not). Life changes, that's a fact we can agree on. Science does well to find truth here. But after this science steps out of its own realm into the realm of religion, namely the origins of life. It assumes what it can only speculate on. And you, like many atheists, will be left in the dark.
@TennisAnnalyst Evolution is not a silly idea, I agree. It is the greatest scientific blunder of our time. Do you believe something just because a scientist tells you? Believe it of not they are fallible just like the rest of us. If you think I'm wrong ask the Piltdown Man for his opinion.
@seraph595 Scientists do not have beliefs. They are not interested in opinions. Scientists have postulates which, with ample evidence and validation, become theories and laws which refine themselves and our understanding over time.
Wow, I can't believe how many people don't stop and think. Do you feel smart when you tell a creationist that your great grandfather was a monkey? I don't have any monkeys in my family tree. Perhaps you inherited your common sense from apes your ancestors were f*cking? I think that is a far more likely theory than evolution.
@ikawpipa I'm sticking to ID, too. The Flying Spaghetti Monster obviously created us all. May we be continually blessed by His Noodley Appendages. Ramen.
@ikawpipa You're forgetting that evolution says nothing about how life started. It's about how life adapts to it's environment.
You can either believe in God and ID and that God set up physics knowing what it would produce (like any creator would). Or you could believe in God and ID and that he physically made each thing but also believe in super evolution at the same time.
The first two fucking blew my mind >.<. They can't piggyback on actual science they've added "God" factors to, and then go on to say shit like the second, explicitly saying that it can't have happened in billions of years, when the last sign said it happened in a few centuries. I understand it is literally all made up, but who gets to put this stuff in a building and call it a museum? This hurts my insides :(
I am a somewhat slow reader and some of the documents are shown for way too long. This video must drive fast readers crazy. But it's a great video otherwise... thanks!
Great video, but I have one nit pick. The term "beg the question" means something philosophically specific. Commonly it is used to mean "raise the question" but this is not right.
@mattachine How isn't it right? In the philosophical sense, it does raise a question, because that's all they're playing in is made up philosophy that isn't worth anything, besides the morals it tries to copy from simple sense. In a literal, I guess, Beg and Raise can be interchanged with no real effect, given you can follow the context of the question. I'm a grammar nazi but really, you'll nit pick about this?
@jaejara they did in the ice age there were niendrethals (think i spelled wrong) and they coexisted with homo sapiens, but the niendrethals went extinct,and yes they were human, and most north american has about 3-1 percent niendrethal in there D.N.A., that just one example
@jaejara they did in the ice age there were niendrethals (think i spelled wrong) and they coexisted with homo sapiens, but the niendrethals went extinct,and yes they were human, and most north american has about 3-1 percent niendrethal in there D.N.A., that just one example, o shet my bad i thought u meant evolution not super bullcrap evolution
They say there's no such thing as evolution, then say that there's super evolution. 'Jesus parrot' is a severe overstatement of their intelligence and an insult to parrots. My parrot watches this and believes it. Proof that humans aren't the only intelligent being. He has also seen creation 'evidence' and doesn't believe it. He's smarter than most Jesus 'parrots'
Actually a lot of Creationists reject SR, GR, and QM. The rejection of Einstein's theories of relativity are based on the bizarre assumption that they somehow lead to moral and cultural relativity.
What happens when you die? Have you told lies, stolen, used God's name in vain(10 Commandments)? If yes, then you're a liar, thief, and a blasphemer in the sight of God. When you die & be judged by God, you'll be guilty of sin, & go to Hell! But God sent His Son Jesus to shed His blood & die on a cross for your sins, He was buried & rose again from the dead on the third day. If you'll believe the Gospel(Jesus's death for your sins, His burial & resurrection)you'll not perish & have eternal life
I would use the term hyper evolution, but good video. Thanks for posting. It proves that accepting evolution is necessary either way- probably better to trust the real scientists.
the thing is you can not get life from non-life .they say we came from a complex set of chemicals that was struck by lightning and this created the first cingle cell organism . what they fail to explain is you can not get life from a chemical mixture no matter how hard you try the only thing you get is something so poisonus that if you touch it you will die . another question no one can realy answer is where did all the matter in the universe come from ?
@dawala1000 Yes it can happen. Organic compounds can come together and form life. You just don't get it. You're so convinced that a man up in the sky exists that your reject anything that get in the was of your petty worthless superstition. Get with the real world. This life is all you have. Quit wasting it by praying to someone who isn't there.
@Cainkane1 when did they creat life from non life ? where did all the matter in the universe come from ? if you know when and where it happend tell me .if as you say organic compounds can come together and creat life why havent we seen it . as for me wasting my time praying to some one thats not there ?its not a waste of time for me at all , i know god is real i see his creation every day i wake upand look out my window. does it bother you that i belive in god ? it sure seems like it .
Scientists unlike creationists admit that there are some things they don't know. There are things they may never know and they admit it. Saying goddidit doesn't solve anything either. I won't believe in god until I see solid scientific evidence. You shouldn't either.
@Cainkane1 i know god is real . we know that all the galxies in the universe are all expanding away from each other and that there is a beginning to it all . the question then becomes how did it happen . by the big bang but beliving in the big bang theory does not contradict jewdisim nor christanity . the very first passage of the bible states in the beginning god created the heaves and the earth . i belive god did creat the big bang to bing every thing in to existence . something from nothing .
@dawala1000 How do you know gods real? Can you see him? Smell him? Can you sense him in any way whatsoever with your five senses? Could it be that this god of yours is just blind faith in something you wished were there? I do think the supernatural exists and this included god.
@Cainkane1 when i was in the 3rd grade i got into a fight with 2 kids in my class as we were waiting for our bus tobe called. 1 kid hit me with a chair on my right side where my kidney was . when i got home i was in pain fromwere the kid hit me and had to take a go to the bathroom when i did it was all blood and i freaked out toldmy mom , she looked and took me to the hospital . on the way there i said a prayer to god to make me be ok .cont...
@Cainkane1 cont... after i said the prayer i felt something like a giant hand with fingers and thumb wrap around my waist on the side where i was hit . it was warm and it took the pain away from me . when i got to see the doc they did a few tests to see how bad my kidney was damaged . my mom showed him a cup that she had me pee in and it was blood red . when the test came back there was no trace of blood at all and the doc said there should have been some . i know theres a god .
@Cainkane1 a plecebo effect doesnt remove blood from a kidney whent here should have been at lest a trace amount that would have shown up but there was none . so what your saying is that i am the one who healed my self ? i dont need any doctor , a psyk or any thing else .you belive what you want and i will do the same .
@dawala1000 I happen to have a kidney stone and I bleed sometimes and sometimes I don't You healed up and the blood was absorbed. The invisible man in the air didn't do a thing for you but if you want to believe that nonsense go ahead. Not me.
@Cainkane1 i know theres a god and nothing you or any one else can say will ever convince me theres not . you go ahead a belive what you want and i will do the same but what give you or any one else for that matterthe right to say im foolish for beliving in god . can you answer this question i first out out there . WHERE DID ALL THE MATTER IN THE UNIVERSE COME FROM . you can not get something from nothing . so where did it come from ?
And sorry, but you can't just bring in a fucking dixie cup full of urine and say "Duuurrr, will you test this?"
"my mom showed him a cup that she had me pee in and it was blood red . when the test came back there was no trace of blood at all and the doc said there should have been some" -dawala1000
What the fuck ever, your expecting anyone to take an eleven year-old's impression of any medical situation seriously? You probably have no idea what he said...
@dawala1000 And then, when you asked you're ignorant christian mother for a translation into laments terms, she probably said something completely retarded... And so you say "God did it!"
Because God said:
"What am I going to do today? The world I created sure is fucked up.... I could really do a lot to make it better!....Fuck that... *fixes little jimmy's upset stomach* I'm calling it a day bitches"
You're idea of God just sits there and laughs at us doesn't he? lol cruel bastard
@bushiyo2 why resort to calling my mother names like a child , does it realy piss you off that i dont belive like you do ? like is aid belive what you want and i will do the same . AND YET YOU NEVER DID ANSWER THE QUESTION I PUT TO YOU. you tell me that i belive what some person wrote in a book and yet you DO THE SAME EXACT THING .have you done the experiments the scientists have done ? or do you just take their word for things because some one scientist said its true so it must be huh .
I mainly find "Creation Theory" funny and sometimes deeply saddening. It clearly shows that some people are capable of believing literally anything, and may even squander huge amounts of time, energy and money on convincing themselves of it.
I know a woman who had a white husband with one white child with blue eyes, straight hair, white features, and one black child with brown eyes, curly hair and African features. Same father. Did the races suddenly "evolve" in that woman's offspring?
The expression of latent genes can be drastic and sudden. It's not "super-evolution."
Why are Evolutionists so terrified of Creation Theory that they must argue against a strawman, rather than the theory?
@RomansGalatians 1. What is the creation theory (using the scientific understanding of what a theory is and the criteria it needs to fulfill in order to be called a theory). 2. No "evolutionist" is terrified of creation theory, just as they are not terrified of the stork theory, the lamarckian theory, alchemy or astrology...they just find them silly, baseless nonsense.
Why all-powerful God CANT create things in an INSTANT? Why all-powerful God WAITED MILLIONS of YEARS for his creation to came to life? If God made the universe and the method he uses was the bigbang, how would you tell the difference? If God uses evolution to create all the species, how would you know? How would you know if there is a God involve or not?
i find it amusing that up until a few years ago creationists denied DNA and genetics and the like as rantings of satanists and unbelievers.........now they embrace it but have manipulated the science to fit their beliefs............come on people the game is finally up admit it gracefully!
If you want to learn some Real Science go watch my favorited videos on my channel, or you could keep pretending You believe in the evolution Fairytale. The truth is in Gods living word the Bible.
@Desdenova262 There is micro-evolution within the species, there is nothing more. Anything else is implied, and in direct contradiction to the scientific method. As apealing as the macro-evolution theory may be it has never, nor is it likely, to ever be observed. Therefore, for now the entire theory is by definition un-scientific, and based entirely upon inconclusive evidence. The scientific method was developed for the expressed purpose of eliminating such implication...
@thinktothemax Yet data from the Human Genome Project provided ample evidence that humans share a common ancestor with rats, dogs, chimpanzees, and other mammals. How would a young earth creationist explain such data?
@ClamCrunchy Common designer, such as all vehicles having roughly the same design on the inside, or a painter painting different paintings with the same kind of style.
@thinktothemax Look more deeply. Certain features of genomes, like pseudogenes, or the fusion of chromosomes, or the redundancy of the genetic code itself, are very difficult to explain without evolutionary theory. On occasion, the human genome will have a gene that is functional in other mammals, but due to frameshift or other mutations no long code for proteins in humans, nor seems to do much of anything. Intelligent design is not able to explain such data, as they
@ClamCrunchy A number of pseudogenes that were thought to have no function do in fact have important functions once investigated "more deeply", such as gene expression, gene regulation, generation of genetic (antibody, antigenic, and other) diversity. Not all "pseudogenes" are used to form functional proteins, instead some have been implicated in a wide variety of other important functions within the genome. I see how you could think they were junk DNA being passed through a "common ancestors".
@thinktothemax A number is not all. Most without question have no function, such as genes disabled by frameshift mutations, which disrupts the reading frame. Scientists can remove fractions of a percent of the mouse genome by removing psuedogenes, with no change in the phenotype. DNA is not a packet of pristine information, but rather a hodgepodge of functional and non-functional elements, with the latter being evolutionary baggage.
@ClamCrunchy I doubt most has no function, but even the non functional DNA is explained in the creation model. We were created perfect but now in our fallen world mutations, over time, may have rendered parts of our genome neutral. Perhaps something was different to allow us to live incredibly long before. You previously mentioned genes that no longer coded proteins were deemed as junk maybe your source is limited, besides wasn't it evolutionists that said the appendix was a vestigial organ?
@thinktothemax No genome would be able to accumulate enough mutations in 6000 years to explain the genome we have now, it's not long enough. The rate of mutations in human cells is known to be 1 mutation/100 million base pairs/generation. So per generation, you'd have about 30 mutations per human.
In 6000 years, there are about 300 generations, so you'd end up with about 9000 mutations. That's not nearly as many nonfunctional or mutated genes that are seen in the human genome.
@ClamCrunchy Your assuming ALL the "neutral" DNA were caused by mutations. As I learn more about this for our debate I find more causes for this, such as endogenous retroviruses making up to 8% of out genome, perhaps even the few genetic bottlenecks had a hand in this as well. Anyways It has been a great discussion, if we go any further we will be delving into incomplete genetic research where the assumptions are to great. Bottom line is the macro-evolution theory is by definition un-scientific.
@thinktothemax he may not feel like taking on your bs but i dooooooo
if you take 2 different SPECIES of wolves that are in the same genus and came from the same ancestor, yet different populations then you see macro-evolution..
@konohanominato Variations of dogs making new variations of dogs is micro evolution. Macro evolution is large changes such as fish to a lizard, or a large rat to a dog, which is only speculated. You could say there is no difference between the two however thats assuming great changes over time is actually possible, you then support that with micro evolution and lots of time and boom a controversy is born. This will go no where were looking at the exact same evidence from different views.
@konohanominato Your not explaining yourself properly... "I didn't speak of variations in one species...... i spoke of different species in one genus." What is the difference between different species within one kind, and variations within one kind? "Macro-evolution is speciation---- when 2 different species come about from the same species...." That is still considered micro evolution...
@thinktothemax Since micro evolution is "proven", and there is no limit on how much an organism can mutate; Why do you creationists have such a problem acknowledging macro evolution? Macro evolution is simply the result of generations upon generations of micro evolution.
@godlynessdog Five big reasons why: Genetic Limits, Cyclical Change, Irreducible Complexity, Nonviability of Transitional Forms, Molecular Isolation. But dont fret I have a new theory! This whole universe is made up of fractals and to get a fractal it has to be balanced so everything was made all at once or say 6 days. From the basic starting fractals such as adams all the way to us humans which leads way to the conciseness fractal, thats why if we are unbalanced when we die we don't go on.
@thinktothemax There is no such thing as genetic limits. Irreducible complexity has already been disproven, more over it has nothing to do with macro evolution. Non-viability of transitional forms? How are transitional forms not viable? Fractals have nothing to do with anything. Explain to me how humans are fractals, because we most definitely are not.
@godlynessdog Im not getting into the macro evolution Im sick of talking about it. I can give you great responses to all your questions that will only lead to more but in the end it will be our views that stop it from continuing not facts. Fractals... Alright well it's a work in progress... You know what I can't give you a good metaphor to help you understand with such a small area to write in... Just think about what I siad... really hard... Not saying you dumb it's just really deep...
@godlynessdog I hope you got my first message, it's not showing that it got posted. But this isn't why im commenting again it's because I thought of an easy way to help you maybe get it how we are a type of fractal... ready? ... How are we not a fractal? Actually you know it's good you asked me oposite to that because I may be using the wrong word... how about "branch"... Yup that's it. Branch.
@godlynessdog This whole universe is made up of branches and to get a branch it has to be balanced first to grow so everything was made all at once or say 6 days. From the basic starting branches such as adams all the way to us humans which leads way to the conciseness branch, thats why if we are unbalanced when we die we don't go on, the branch we are ment move on to doesn't grow, but if you balanced you do.
@thinktothemax What you're saying is not scientific. Maybe I wasn't clear earlier; I wanted you to provide scientific evidence. I didn't want you to preach to me. Everything you are saying has no evidence supporting it,
@godlynessdog You must have missed my other comments... You said "how are humans fractals" so I was going to explain then I decided that was the wrong word, I should use "branch" then I rewrote my first paragraph using branch to help but now you think im preaching lol. The evidence is that things are currently overall balanced and when you observe it, its like a tree branching out bigger and bigger and/or smaller and smaller. Im taking solid facts and looking at it in a different way thats it.
Well then, you must know that Evolution is the best theory we have to date. And i suppose thats why it is taught around the world in all major colleges. Its the only theory that has solid facts!
@Desdenova262 That's your opinion and "And i suppose thats why it is taught around the world in all major colleges." is an Appeal to the Majority Fallacy. I understand to the best of your knowledge you think it's the only theory that has solid facts. I could picture you saying Well then, you must know that the flat earth is the best theory we have to date. And i suppose thats why it is taught around the world in all major colleges. Its the only theory that has solid facts! No point in this.
Well, currently, it's the only theory - period. There are no other testable explanatory models for this set of phenomena. The last alternative that was a candidate for the position was Lamarckian evolutionary theory, and that got rejected when we learned more about heredity.
Hmm... what if the flood were some kind of cosmic event, a flood of some kind of radiation, and the Earth IS Noah's Ark? (I like sci-fi... regardless, nice vid.)
@MichaelHTillman When it comes to ancient myths everything is taken literally. It's not like the writer of the Bible was Hemingway and something and wanted a bunch of complex metaphors and crap. It's a myth. You are supposed to just eat it up. The earth was created in seven days. Adam and Eve ate an fruit that somehow determine man's fate. God sent a flood and gave mercy to only one single group of people. etc. etc. These are bullshit that people can move on with life not knowing.
@shoulderkolibri Hey Koli. :-) I was just positing something because the idea hadn't occurred to me - there may be many books with that as a premise. However, myths are often metaphors. Take Job and Utnapisthim - both can be said to be myths, both can be said to be metaphors. To say that a story in the Bible or in the Tao te Ching isn't as complex as Hemingway is giving Hemingway a lot of credit, though, as he had a few more thousand years of literary critique from which to benefit.
I believe this! Much evidence is place as propaganda instead. The bible says the earth brought up animals according to there kind & they just found dinosaur blood now how can that be if the earth is 4.5 billion years old. This is not even a matter for debate its obvious now science disproves your theory.
creationists have evidence. What do you cotton pickin evolutionists have? Nothing but conjecture and hearsay. Where's your book by God? Oh right, he doesn't speak to liars!
Me and my family are driving 9 hours on Tuesday to this museum
2 Take with you seven pairs of every kind of clean animal, a male and its mate, and one pair of every kind of unclean animal, a male and its mate, 3 and also seven pairs of every kind of bird, male and female, to keep their various kinds alive throughout the earth.
There were a lot more than just two of every kind of animal, which opens up a lot more genetic possibilities .
@ronin24113 Still a problem when we know the minimum viable population for a species is usually in the hundreds and even then with human intervention it's difficult to prevent an extinction. :)
Dude, you could have saved yourself a lot of time and energy if you just said....THE STORY OF NOAH IS JUST PLAIN RETARDED! A giant ark? The planet flooded? Two of every animal on a boat? Really people? Creationists are fucking idiots.
It never fails to be hilarious how science continues to prove them wrong, but rather than admit that they are wrong, they'll just make more and more and more convoluted explanations which require jury rigging at every single point by their imaginary sociopath in the clouds.It really is just moving into the realm of the staggeringly, jaw-droppingly pathetic.
Anti-evolutionist claim: evolution is the belief that a dog gives birth to a cat!
Which is a pretty accurate estimate of SUPER-EVOLUTION.
No evolutionist would believe that and it would even disprove current evolutionary models.
Oh the irony.
"GODDIDITGODDIDITGODDIDITGODDIDITGODDIDITGODDIDITGODDIDITGODDIDITGODDIDITGODDIDITGODDIDITGODDIDITGODDIDITGODDIDITGODDIDITGODDIDITGODDIDITGODDIDITGODDIDITGODDIDITGODDIDITGODDIDITGODDIDIT" - Creationist museum
I don't mean to sound rude or uneducated. but this video author really needs to learn math. "200-300 species in the first few centuraries" centuraries being 100 years. so afew of them (likes call 3 afew) would mean that there would have to be 1 new species born each year. how does that possible require a new seperation event every 4mins? can someone please explain that one too me?
All Creationists should be banned from using all technology, and from receiving modern medical treatment.
They should also be forced to pay a "Noah tax" that will go straight to the public education system to make up for the damage they do to society's intellectual well-being.
@BurtonKelly0 No, I do not, going back to you're original comment. The speed of evolution depends upon the rate at which the species repoduces. It's still a slow process because it goes at the rate for every one individual born. For example bacteria multiply very fast and have been know to adapt over time to their environment; and viruses for that matter.
Like Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), it can evolve resistance very quickly to antiretrovirals, & patient can go through 10 medications, and virus population becomes resistant to all of them.
A new therapy uses natural selection to its advantage by, after Highly Active Antiretroviral Treatment (HAART) where the person takes multiple drugs, stopping all of them at once. The wildtype virus then re-propagates, Then they smash it with a massive cocktail of drugs.
@midknighted E. Coli generation time; 17 minutes. Human generation time; ~20 years. In the time that you have 1 human generation, you have roughly 620,000 generations of E. Coli. Plenty of time for a comparitively faster evolutionary track on the microbial stage.
One more thing, Adaptation is real and people and animals do adapt to different regions because adaptation is like a survival mechanism, thats why you have the same types of animals but different appearances. But humans were not monkeys, or apes, at all. They physical appearances change because of the region they live in. If i took adaptation and added extra to the beginning then I can trick people into believing that there is no God, and this my friends is called Mortal Kombat "Deception".
The true definition of science. Hmph Hmmm Science is understanding how God works through biology, chemistry, and etc. Evolution is not from God and thats why you people(yes, You People) dont believe what the bible says. You want proof and you demand proof. lol.Do think God will stoop down to the level of people that demand proof from him when there is enough proof in your tiny little bodies, around this whole planet, and in the Bible thats has been misused by false prophets? No, wake up people.
@tlrflyguy860 No it isn't, Science isn't about understanding god, it's about understanding about the physical world and how it works. Finding true answer.
Religion is a lie, it NEVER done anything good, it never gave us any advancement.
If you were born in Pakistan, you would of been Muslim, born in Classical Greek, you would believe in Zeus, Born in USA, Christian, Born in Aztec society, you would believe in huit..., born in India, Hindu. Born in China, Buddhism.
@DoNotLaughAtMe Well, sir you said dont laugh at you and now I am sorry if I hurt you and forgive me for laughing. I dont believe in religion sir, I believe in God and I believe and have accepted Jesus as my savior because he died for my sins and now Im a new person. Um no I wouldn't with my personality I would question most things and I would do my research on things and not just go with what Im taught. Sorry, your argument is irrelevant because I know arabs that believe in God and Jesus so...
@tlrflyguy860 Hah, Religion damage me, it gave me that name. We are taught these things because it is necessarily for survival, I wasn't really taught evolution, I was taught adaptations. I'm 14. Yes animals evolve to suit their surroundings, We lost our fur because of fire that kept us warm, and we started wearing clothes hundreds of thousands of years ago.
Believe in things without evidence isn't good.
its too hard to explain evolution on 500 limit, watch some youtube video to find out.
@DoNotLaughAtMe Forgive me my bad I didnt know you were fourteen. Thats why you dont understand anything lol cause you dont know and caught up in the things around you. You are in school and these things are new to you and this is exactly what I mean people if you teach someone something when they are young it does stick to them but, when they put no effort into finding the real truth then they get caught up in things lie evolution. In due time you willl understand just dont be closed minded lol
Nice video. One minor correction, though: at 2:00 you said it was an argument from ignorance. The example you gave was more like an argument from personal incredulity (i.e. "I personally find X to be unlikely or impossible, therefore X is false").
Also, I loved the "fine print" you showed at 2:57. That is an ad hoc fallacy if I ever saw one! "Oh no, my argument is sinking. I'll just pull this "fact" out of my ass to try and salvage my failing argument". LOL
Do you really fail to see that this is the opposite of evolution. This is like taking two dogs and breeding them over time to end up with poodles. you can't do it in reverse. With each step, there is less information, for the things "bred out" are just that... gone. The theory of evolution is just the opposite; it is based on something that we have never seen happen... additional information happening because of genetic mutation that proves to be beneficial. It just doesn't happen.
@buxtehude76 I have been wondering why evolution isn't fact yet. I guess that is why is a theory. I guess we still need more evidence, but we still have a mountain of evidence unlike creationists, nothing at all.
@DoNotLaughAtMe its not fact because its from satan and only in the america its stand really strong... That why it isnt fact and why they are tryin to push a NEW WORLD ORDER so they can deceive the masses upon masses of people but, not so much just the few that will be left When Jesus comes back cause their plan wil fail. But they push it because they already decieved a whole nation. Do you know what a nephilim is? oh i gues that fairy tale
@DoNotLaughAtMe Faith is the substance of things hoped for and the evidence of things not seen. lol. Im 100% percent sure that people did not come from monkeys and a big bowl of soup that cooked up. Thats why its still theory. Im pretty sure the evidence of paluxy river in texas proves alot of evolution wrong, Im pretty sure if you dont understand the bible you try to find out why people believe and have spiritual evidence that you dont have. 100% sure no? were you there when God created.
"Creationist" do NOT teach that no mutations can be beneficial. That is a strawman.
KJoensen 1 day ago
Dear Creationism...
keep trying,
Sincerely, theory of evolution
TheAussie2012 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheAussie2012 Man can engineer molecules! It shows how it takes INTELLIGENCE in controlled laboratory conditions to mimic, manipulate, plagiarize a cell's Design! Scientists COPY genetic sequences!! They dont create anything!!
Its all Man made Synthetic chemistry! and it has nothing to do with the origin of life!! Homochirality is a disaster for any sort of naturalistic origins! There is no demonstrated source for such non-racemic mixture of sugars in any plausible pre-biotic environment!
5tonyvvvv 1 week ago
Here is a question for the OP not related to the subject.... being that you cannot have space without time or time without space, DO you think that some day the human race, if we dont kill ourselves off by greedy agendas, will be able to time travel? It would seem to me that navigation of the necessary reference points for such a thing could be possible if we could ever nail down the exact time of the BANG! which may never happen!
abeeftec 2 weeks ago
A fourth-dimensional being could traverse this time continuum simply by going from point A to point B, because that being can perceive that dimension. The third-dimensional being cannot.
Its funny how this statement COMPLETELY correlates perfectly to the Bible when it says that God is EVERYWHERE PRESENT! Which even in the space time Continuum theory they say that a 4th dimensional being, can see a 3dim being but a 3 dim being cant see a 4thdim being!! So, Does this NOT PROVE GOD as possible?
abeeftec 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@abeeftec Man can engineer molecules! It shows how it takes INTELLIGENCE in controlled laboratory conditions to mimic, manipulate, plagiarize a cell's Design! Scientists COPY genetic sequences!! They dont create anything!!
Its all Man made Synthetic chemistry! and it has nothing to do with the origin of life!! Homochirality is a disaster for any sort of naturalistic origins! There is no demonstrated source for such non-racemic mixture of sugars in any plausible pre-biotic environment!
5tonyvvvv 1 week ago
Is it not a fact that Energy cannot be destroyed? Well then, what happens to YOU when you die? And, what form of energy were you before you were born?
abeeftec 2 weeks ago
Even in the space time continuum it is stated that...a dimension does not need to be detected to exist YET, You do NOT believe there is a God yet you believe there is a Fourth Dimension? Please tell me then, What exists inside the fourth dimension?
abeeftec 2 weeks ago
LOL! Again you attempt to take what they said in that statement as they dont use Logic Reason and believe in the scientific method! 1. The Scientific method is NOT perfect! 2. The scientific method WHEN DEALING WITH THE SUBJECT OF EVOLUTION, Scientists who are also atheists,Not all, but those who are have pushed things through the scientific method to make it fact when Evolution iS NOT FACT!! If you say it is then you lack all credibility in my book. You can say its LIKELY but NOT FACT!
abeeftec 2 weeks ago
Love that you think you KNOW that the fly changed 50 million years ago! Did you ever stop and think about the fact that God, in the last days, Would send a STRONG delusion that the unbelievers would continue to believe a LIE?? Did you Ever stop to think that God has the power to MAKE YOU NEVER BELIEVE IN HIM or MAKE YOU BELIEVE IN HIM? You better start BEGGING HIM TO SHOW YOU THE TRUTH!! Because once he shows you the truth, You can weed through BOTH sides and KNOW you know the truth!
abeeftec 2 weeks ago
In your Biology 101.... Who is the THEY you are speaking about in the bottom Paragraph?
abeeftec 2 weeks ago
HEY! Not that I agree with any of the Creationist museum stuff, But, How do you know how many Alleles there could be for any given gene after the flood? Can God not change whatever he wants whenever he wants? You fail to see that the one who makes the laws that govern what you know! KNOWS THE LAWS MADE THE LAWS AND CAN CHANGE THEM WITHOUT SEEKING YOUR APROVAL TO DO SO! Funny how you all love to claim what is possible and what is not yet you STILL Have no answer for the singularity of bigbang!
abeeftec 2 weeks ago
Can you please send me to the data from where you got your answer NO from? Because I see you speaking of DATA, And I see that you are throwing links up everywhere for people to click on to show them more on WORTHLESS informations, Yet when you speak of this DATA YOU ARE SO SURE OF..... NO LINK? Wheres the evidence? Why dont just one of you atheists ever put up links to prove your points? OH, because most of you are in this for the arguement and not the actual facts of it all!
abeeftec 2 weeks ago
The question you ask about IS IT GENETICALLY POSSIBLE TO START FROM 2 ANIMALS AND PRODUCE ON AVERAGE 100 SPECIES IN 400 YEARS? Number 1. Where did you get 400 years from? And 2. In my lifetime they have man has produced more breeds of dogs then before i was born! Thats only 40 years!! So, Man has figured out genetics and now he thinks he is more wise then God! So he figured out HOW God did it? Wow, sure doesnt prove there is no God!
abeeftec 2 weeks ago
I see in every question you raise that your big issue with God is HES MEAN!! And you ask the question, " Why would an all loving creator create mankind knowing he was going to throw them into Hell?" Nice Question but what you fail to see is that he did it for those he is redeeming! He does NOT LOVE those he is allowing to continue on their path to hell! Anyone who tells you otherwise and says they are a Christain doesnt read their Bible or may not even be a Real Christain! real PSALMS 5:5 11:5
abeeftec 2 weeks ago
And I guess since you found a Museum Called CREATIONIST MUSEUM, I GUESS that means that is what all christains believe? It is NOT in the Bible! That museum is mans way of trying to make sense of the fact that he doesnt have enough info to argue with one of you people! I will argue with you all because you are so dense you cant see that you just follow whatever man tells you to believe! If he has credentials from a school then he MUST be smart and to be listened to! thats what you thinK!
abeeftec 2 weeks ago
I love that you said, Since you cannot conceive it is possible, it must not be! Is that not how you feel about GOD? Since you cannot conceive God exists, IF he is a LOVING God, Then he must not be because there is so much suffering in the world!! funny thing is that is the reason you dont want to conceive of him! Because you dont agree that he lets people suffer! Well, In the same way, There is way more evidence for CREATION then there is for EVOLUTION! Our universe SCREAMS Intelligence!
abeeftec 2 weeks ago
Also, there is no MOUNTAIN of evidence that suggest everything evolved! Since the Internet has gotten so huge, Anyone can write anything and as long as the scientist says its so then its made fact! There is NOT mountains of evidence that PROVES evolution! There is ONLY speculative facts that COULD prove it, IF they could link them together.So they micro the theory by Mutations and call it proof of Macro! then add everything else and call it MOUNTAINS of evidence without anything linking them
abeeftec 2 weeks ago
You know I find it funny that you people think that the only way something can become fact is if a bunch of other people, called "peers" tell you its true! all of them! So, How many PEERS have to say it looks good before its considered TRUTH? Is it 7 out of 10? So are the other 3 who didnt agree stupid? OR does just one disagreeing make it false? IS he smarter then the other 9? LOL! You JUST dont get it that God will hide the truth from those who PERISH! Goes against GOD IS LOVE doesnt it?
abeeftec 2 weeks ago
It is hilarious that you Atheists believe that Mutations are Evolutionary PROOF! LOL! So, If a man is born with 4 fingers he has been born with traits from his past!! So, then if a man is born with an extra thumb then that is his FUTURE self somehow coming out in his birth? LOL!!!!! I laugh every time I hear this arguement! It is so funny! MILLIONS of years of evolution can happen in ONE BIRTH accidentally yet the rest will catch up in say, millions of years! total crap!
abeeftec 2 weeks ago
You atheists are shear morons! How on earth do you think that your precious evolution and big bang theory are facts is way beyond my thinking! How can you think that its THE TRUTH about how we came to be? Its speculation and just because Science embraces it does not make it the end all. Just because you think it is doesnt make it so!
I also love how you all, in every debate, have to tell the creationist he doesnt even know what evolution is! Its definition has been changed!
abeeftec 2 weeks ago
@seraph595 you refuse to believe that we evolved from primates but you're ok that we came from dirt? Well, maybe some day you'll be fully evolved into a monkey from your current state.
paramattic70 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
One Young-Earth Creationist says to another "Which is closer - the Moon or Mexico"? The other points at the Moon and replies "The Moon - Duh! You can't see Mexico from here".
csmcmillion 3 weeks ago
The inconsistency is mind blowing. It's "amazing" how they are able to reconcile those facts. On the one hand they need the "random" accumulation of genetic differences by natural selection to explain Noah and speciation, on the other hand they must continue to convince themselves that evolution and common decent is not only not true, but the most ridicules idea ever.
pegasusfreedom 1 month ago
And I thought I couldn't hate religion any more than I already did....
LOGICandREAS0N 1 month ago
It wont let me vew the full collection of photos because it is a private page. pls fix
shadowstrider0 1 month ago
The great thing about evolution is it happens whether you "believe" in it or not! I can accept evolution as truth, those poor religious folk have to "believe" in their god.
screenpuller 3 months ago in playlist Evolution/Creationism
Lol thank gawd my phone lost connection
kysmelmonge 3 months ago
I came into this video via a link from that of the "museum." This video brought back my sanity.
CaptainAwesomeoh13 3 months ago
@TennisAnnalyst If one is a 'philosopher' yes, a research scientist, no.
dralexoppenheimer 3 months ago
stop it, please!!! I can´t stop laughting, my tummy hurts for laughting... omg, this is hilarious
can really Christians be that stupid?
Prettyshandra8 3 months ago
@TennisAnnalyst, your not searching hard enough if you think that observation and logic are all humanity has. And you didn't answer my question. Death is coming, are you prepared to take the Scientific Path when oblivion is staring you in the face? I wouldn't be ready, if for nothing else I would be a Christian because it teaches that we are not accidents, and designed to live forever. So what's your answer? What will you do when your time has come?
seraph595 3 months ago
@seraph595 When oblivion stares at you, stare back. [See: Nietzsche]. Who needs ‘saving’ from death? Death is a natural process, inevitable as with the decay of any thermodynamic process and system in the universe.
It is not saving that you appear to desire, it is escape. Understand that science may well develop into technology which allows life extension or cybernetic immortality. Your faith may endure but science overcomes.
dralexoppenheimer 3 months ago
@TennisAnnalyst Observation and logic will get you only so far. Science cannot save you from death, and it cannot give you all the answers. Christianity alone can do both. Again, your studies give you what is at best an educated guess on the origin of life, and your deceiving yourself if you think its more than that. I reiterate, how will you save yourself from death?
seraph595 4 months ago
@TennisAnnalyst, I believe you tennis. There is not a creationist out there that will say that natural selection and micro-evolution are not real(I believe in speciation, but others may not). Life changes, that's a fact we can agree on. Science does well to find truth here. But after this science steps out of its own realm into the realm of religion, namely the origins of life. It assumes what it can only speculate on. And you, like many atheists, will be left in the dark.
seraph595 4 months ago
@TennisAnnalyst Evolution is not a silly idea, I agree. It is the greatest scientific blunder of our time. Do you believe something just because a scientist tells you? Believe it of not they are fallible just like the rest of us. If you think I'm wrong ask the Piltdown Man for his opinion.
seraph595 4 months ago
@seraph595 Scientists do not have beliefs. They are not interested in opinions. Scientists have postulates which, with ample evidence and validation, become theories and laws which refine themselves and our understanding over time.
dralexoppenheimer 3 months ago
these are very high and dangerous levels of stupid.
henchmen999 4 months ago
Wow, I can't believe how many people don't stop and think. Do you feel smart when you tell a creationist that your great grandfather was a monkey? I don't have any monkeys in my family tree. Perhaps you inherited your common sense from apes your ancestors were f*cking? I think that is a far more likely theory than evolution.
seraph595 4 months ago in playlist Evolution/Creationism
the alternative theory is that everything came from a soup.. i think i'll stick with the ID.
ikawpipa 4 months ago
@ikawpipa I'm sticking to ID, too. The Flying Spaghetti Monster obviously created us all. May we be continually blessed by His Noodley Appendages. Ramen.
TheD0ded0de 4 months ago
@ikawpipa You're forgetting that evolution says nothing about how life started. It's about how life adapts to it's environment.
You can either believe in God and ID and that God set up physics knowing what it would produce (like any creator would). Or you could believe in God and ID and that he physically made each thing but also believe in super evolution at the same time.
Octamed 4 months ago
The first two fucking blew my mind >.<. They can't piggyback on actual science they've added "God" factors to, and then go on to say shit like the second, explicitly saying that it can't have happened in billions of years, when the last sign said it happened in a few centuries. I understand it is literally all made up, but who gets to put this stuff in a building and call it a museum? This hurts my insides :(
b33p3rz 4 months ago
I am a somewhat slow reader and some of the documents are shown for way too long. This video must drive fast readers crazy. But it's a great video otherwise... thanks!
mikespulligan 4 months ago
@mikespulligan Amen
b33p3rz 4 months ago
Great video, but I have one nit pick. The term "beg the question" means something philosophically specific. Commonly it is used to mean "raise the question" but this is not right.
mattachine 4 months ago
@mattachine How isn't it right? In the philosophical sense, it does raise a question, because that's all they're playing in is made up philosophy that isn't worth anything, besides the morals it tries to copy from simple sense. In a literal, I guess, Beg and Raise can be interchanged with no real effect, given you can follow the context of the question. I'm a grammar nazi but really, you'll nit pick about this?
b33p3rz 4 months ago
Yay for votebots! Attempted Censorship should be a crime punishable by being banned from the internet like they do with some child predators.
MrGoldenChocobo 5 months ago
Why didn't humans super-evolve into separate species? Mystery indeed.
jaejara 6 months ago
@jaejara they did in the ice age there were niendrethals (think i spelled wrong) and they coexisted with homo sapiens, but the niendrethals went extinct,and yes they were human, and most north american has about 3-1 percent niendrethal in there D.N.A., that just one example
HeadShoht 5 months ago
@jaejara they did in the ice age there were niendrethals (think i spelled wrong) and they coexisted with homo sapiens, but the niendrethals went extinct,and yes they were human, and most north american has about 3-1 percent niendrethal in there D.N.A., that just one example, o shet my bad i thought u meant evolution not super bullcrap evolution
HeadShoht 5 months ago
They say there's no such thing as evolution, then say that there's super evolution. 'Jesus parrot' is a severe overstatement of their intelligence and an insult to parrots. My parrot watches this and believes it. Proof that humans aren't the only intelligent being. He has also seen creation 'evidence' and doesn't believe it. He's smarter than most Jesus 'parrots'
ChooksLoverCC 6 months ago
Actually a lot of Creationists reject SR, GR, and QM. The rejection of Einstein's theories of relativity are based on the bizarre assumption that they somehow lead to moral and cultural relativity.
PissedFechtmeister 6 months ago
That museum needs to be destroyed! Uggh!
njintau 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What happens when you die? Have you told lies, stolen, used God's name in vain(10 Commandments)? If yes, then you're a liar, thief, and a blasphemer in the sight of God. When you die & be judged by God, you'll be guilty of sin, & go to Hell! But God sent His Son Jesus to shed His blood & die on a cross for your sins, He was buried & rose again from the dead on the third day. If you'll believe the Gospel(Jesus's death for your sins, His burial & resurrection)you'll not perish & have eternal life
gramosjr7 6 months ago
I would use the term hyper evolution, but good video. Thanks for posting. It proves that accepting evolution is necessary either way- probably better to trust the real scientists.
feee99 7 months ago
The bad 90s rock music distracts from an otherwise good video.
LordLoudoun 7 months ago
@LordLoudoun 90's rock? Hardly. This is by "Dream On" by Aerosmith, a song from the early 70's.
Akira625 7 months ago
Placebo effect dawala. You healed like most people do.
Cainkane1 7 months ago
Religious drivel.
Cainkane1 7 months ago
the thing is you can not get life from non-life .they say we came from a complex set of chemicals that was struck by lightning and this created the first cingle cell organism . what they fail to explain is you can not get life from a chemical mixture no matter how hard you try the only thing you get is something so poisonus that if you touch it you will die . another question no one can realy answer is where did all the matter in the universe come from ?
dawala1000 7 months ago
@dawala1000 Yes it can happen. Organic compounds can come together and form life. You just don't get it. You're so convinced that a man up in the sky exists that your reject anything that get in the was of your petty worthless superstition. Get with the real world. This life is all you have. Quit wasting it by praying to someone who isn't there.
Cainkane1 7 months ago
@Cainkane1 when did they creat life from non life ? where did all the matter in the universe come from ? if you know when and where it happend tell me .if as you say organic compounds can come together and creat life why havent we seen it . as for me wasting my time praying to some one thats not there ?its not a waste of time for me at all , i know god is real i see his creation every day i wake upand look out my window. does it bother you that i belive in god ? it sure seems like it .
dawala1000 7 months ago
@dawala1000
Scientists unlike creationists admit that there are some things they don't know. There are things they may never know and they admit it. Saying goddidit doesn't solve anything either. I won't believe in god until I see solid scientific evidence. You shouldn't either.
Cainkane1 7 months ago
@Cainkane1 i know god is real . we know that all the galxies in the universe are all expanding away from each other and that there is a beginning to it all . the question then becomes how did it happen . by the big bang but beliving in the big bang theory does not contradict jewdisim nor christanity . the very first passage of the bible states in the beginning god created the heaves and the earth . i belive god did creat the big bang to bing every thing in to existence . something from nothing .
dawala1000 7 months ago
@dawala1000 How do you know gods real? Can you see him? Smell him? Can you sense him in any way whatsoever with your five senses? Could it be that this god of yours is just blind faith in something you wished were there? I do think the supernatural exists and this included god.
Cainkane1 7 months ago
@Cainkane1 when i was in the 3rd grade i got into a fight with 2 kids in my class as we were waiting for our bus tobe called. 1 kid hit me with a chair on my right side where my kidney was . when i got home i was in pain fromwere the kid hit me and had to take a go to the bathroom when i did it was all blood and i freaked out toldmy mom , she looked and took me to the hospital . on the way there i said a prayer to god to make me be ok .cont...
dawala1000 7 months ago
@Cainkane1 cont... after i said the prayer i felt something like a giant hand with fingers and thumb wrap around my waist on the side where i was hit . it was warm and it took the pain away from me . when i got to see the doc they did a few tests to see how bad my kidney was damaged . my mom showed him a cup that she had me pee in and it was blood red . when the test came back there was no trace of blood at all and the doc said there should have been some . i know theres a god .
dawala1000 7 months ago
@dawala1000 bullshit.
soulfunkcity 7 months ago
@dawala1000 Placebo effect. You're fooling yourself. Sorry theres no god. Get to a doctor.
Cainkane1 7 months ago
@Cainkane1 a plecebo effect doesnt remove blood from a kidney whent here should have been at lest a trace amount that would have shown up but there was none . so what your saying is that i am the one who healed my self ? i dont need any doctor , a psyk or any thing else .you belive what you want and i will do the same .
dawala1000 7 months ago
@dawala1000 I happen to have a kidney stone and I bleed sometimes and sometimes I don't You healed up and the blood was absorbed. The invisible man in the air didn't do a thing for you but if you want to believe that nonsense go ahead. Not me.
Cainkane1 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Cainkane1 i know theres a god and nothing you or any one else can say will ever convince me theres not . you go ahead a belive what you want and i will do the same but what give you or any one else for that matterthe right to say im foolish for beliving in god . can you answer this question i first out out there . WHERE DID ALL THE MATTER IN THE UNIVERSE COME FROM . you can not get something from nothing . so where did it come from ?
dawala1000 7 months ago
@dawala1000 You're story is retarded.
And sorry, but you can't just bring in a fucking dixie cup full of urine and say "Duuurrr, will you test this?"
"my mom showed him a cup that she had me pee in and it was blood red . when the test came back there was no trace of blood at all and the doc said there should have been some" -dawala1000
What the fuck ever, your expecting anyone to take an eleven year-old's impression of any medical situation seriously? You probably have no idea what he said...
bushiyo2 7 months ago
@dawala1000 And then, when you asked you're ignorant christian mother for a translation into laments terms, she probably said something completely retarded... And so you say "God did it!"
Because God said:
"What am I going to do today? The world I created sure is fucked up.... I could really do a lot to make it better!....Fuck that... *fixes little jimmy's upset stomach* I'm calling it a day bitches"
You're idea of God just sits there and laughs at us doesn't he? lol cruel bastard
bushiyo2 7 months ago
@bushiyo2 why resort to calling my mother names like a child , does it realy piss you off that i dont belive like you do ? like is aid belive what you want and i will do the same . AND YET YOU NEVER DID ANSWER THE QUESTION I PUT TO YOU. you tell me that i belive what some person wrote in a book and yet you DO THE SAME EXACT THING .have you done the experiments the scientists have done ? or do you just take their word for things because some one scientist said its true so it must be huh .
dawala1000 7 months ago
Tis is sad.
Tigerzie 7 months ago
have no new organs yet...
misterdeeeep 7 months ago
I mainly find "Creation Theory" funny and sometimes deeply saddening. It clearly shows that some people are capable of believing literally anything, and may even squander huge amounts of time, energy and money on convincing themselves of it.
saintlybastard 7 months ago
I know a woman who had a white husband with one white child with blue eyes, straight hair, white features, and one black child with brown eyes, curly hair and African features. Same father. Did the races suddenly "evolve" in that woman's offspring?
The expression of latent genes can be drastic and sudden. It's not "super-evolution."
Why are Evolutionists so terrified of Creation Theory that they must argue against a strawman, rather than the theory?
RomansGalatians 8 months ago
@RomansGalatians same father my ass
killgore333333 7 months ago
@killgore333333 LOL. No, really, they had blood tests.
RomansGalatians 7 months ago
@killgore333333 Her grandfather was black.
RomansGalatians 7 months ago
@RomansGalatians 1. What is the creation theory (using the scientific understanding of what a theory is and the criteria it needs to fulfill in order to be called a theory). 2. No "evolutionist" is terrified of creation theory, just as they are not terrified of the stork theory, the lamarckian theory, alchemy or astrology...they just find them silly, baseless nonsense.
83Hammerhead 7 months ago
I liked the song. Nice touch.
ArpholomuleNutt 8 months ago
lol, i haven't had an imaginary friend since 6 yeas old
MegaPorkboy 8 months ago
Why all-powerful God CANT create things in an INSTANT? Why all-powerful God WAITED MILLIONS of YEARS for his creation to came to life? If God made the universe and the method he uses was the bigbang, how would you tell the difference? If God uses evolution to create all the species, how would you know? How would you know if there is a God involve or not?
MrBabyMaddox 9 months ago
so retarded. I'm so creationists who teach this to children are commiting child abuse
Oddessuss 9 months ago
Wow this speciation is damn fast. I hop I won't turn into another animal in the next hours.
gastarbeiter1 9 months ago
i find it amusing that up until a few years ago creationists denied DNA and genetics and the like as rantings of satanists and unbelievers.........now they embrace it but have manipulated the science to fit their beliefs............come on people the game is finally up admit it gracefully!
jamesjnr67 9 months ago
wait . . . do they not realize what a billion years is
Ralokone 9 months ago
suggest unintelligent evolution.
ClamCrunchy 9 months ago
You suggest a change from a rock to a human is more believable...?
thinktothemax 9 months ago
If you want to learn some Real Science go watch my favorited videos on my channel, or you could keep pretending You believe in the evolution Fairytale. The truth is in Gods living word the Bible.
coolvideo28 9 months ago
@coolvideo28
Definition of Science: is an enterprise that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of
"testable explanations" and predictions about the world.
Superstitions have no "testable explanations".
That is why god is in theology and not science. :)
Desdenova262 9 months ago
@Desdenova262 There is micro-evolution within the species, there is nothing more. Anything else is implied, and in direct contradiction to the scientific method. As apealing as the macro-evolution theory may be it has never, nor is it likely, to ever be observed. Therefore, for now the entire theory is by definition un-scientific, and based entirely upon inconclusive evidence. The scientific method was developed for the expressed purpose of eliminating such implication...
thinktothemax 9 months ago
@thinktothemax Yet data from the Human Genome Project provided ample evidence that humans share a common ancestor with rats, dogs, chimpanzees, and other mammals. How would a young earth creationist explain such data?
ClamCrunchy 9 months ago
@ClamCrunchy Common designer, such as all vehicles having roughly the same design on the inside, or a painter painting different paintings with the same kind of style.
thinktothemax 9 months ago
@thinktothemax Look more deeply. Certain features of genomes, like pseudogenes, or the fusion of chromosomes, or the redundancy of the genetic code itself, are very difficult to explain without evolutionary theory. On occasion, the human genome will have a gene that is functional in other mammals, but due to frameshift or other mutations no long code for proteins in humans, nor seems to do much of anything. Intelligent design is not able to explain such data, as they
ClamCrunchy 9 months ago
@ClamCrunchy A number of pseudogenes that were thought to have no function do in fact have important functions once investigated "more deeply", such as gene expression, gene regulation, generation of genetic (antibody, antigenic, and other) diversity. Not all "pseudogenes" are used to form functional proteins, instead some have been implicated in a wide variety of other important functions within the genome. I see how you could think they were junk DNA being passed through a "common ancestors".
thinktothemax 9 months ago
@thinktothemax A number is not all. Most without question have no function, such as genes disabled by frameshift mutations, which disrupts the reading frame. Scientists can remove fractions of a percent of the mouse genome by removing psuedogenes, with no change in the phenotype. DNA is not a packet of pristine information, but rather a hodgepodge of functional and non-functional elements, with the latter being evolutionary baggage.
ClamCrunchy 9 months ago
@ClamCrunchy I doubt most has no function, but even the non functional DNA is explained in the creation model. We were created perfect but now in our fallen world mutations, over time, may have rendered parts of our genome neutral. Perhaps something was different to allow us to live incredibly long before. You previously mentioned genes that no longer coded proteins were deemed as junk maybe your source is limited, besides wasn't it evolutionists that said the appendix was a vestigial organ?
thinktothemax 9 months ago
@thinktothemax No genome would be able to accumulate enough mutations in 6000 years to explain the genome we have now, it's not long enough. The rate of mutations in human cells is known to be 1 mutation/100 million base pairs/generation. So per generation, you'd have about 30 mutations per human.
In 6000 years, there are about 300 generations, so you'd end up with about 9000 mutations. That's not nearly as many nonfunctional or mutated genes that are seen in the human genome.
ClamCrunchy 9 months ago
@ClamCrunchy Your assuming ALL the "neutral" DNA were caused by mutations. As I learn more about this for our debate I find more causes for this, such as endogenous retroviruses making up to 8% of out genome, perhaps even the few genetic bottlenecks had a hand in this as well. Anyways It has been a great discussion, if we go any further we will be delving into incomplete genetic research where the assumptions are to great. Bottom line is the macro-evolution theory is by definition un-scientific.
thinktothemax 9 months ago
@thinktothemax Okay.
ClamCrunchy 9 months ago
@thinktothemax he may not feel like taking on your bs but i dooooooo
if you take 2 different SPECIES of wolves that are in the same genus and came from the same ancestor, yet different populations then you see macro-evolution..
konohanominato 9 months ago
@konohanominato Sorry thats a type of micro-evolution.
thinktothemax 9 months ago
@thinktothemax hahahaha thats where it get freaking hilarious
Macro-evolution is speciation---- when 2 different species come about from the same species....
konohanominato 9 months ago
@konohanominato Variations of dogs making new variations of dogs is micro evolution. Macro evolution is large changes such as fish to a lizard, or a large rat to a dog, which is only speculated. You could say there is no difference between the two however thats assuming great changes over time is actually possible, you then support that with micro evolution and lots of time and boom a controversy is born. This will go no where were looking at the exact same evidence from different views.
thinktothemax 9 months ago
@thinktothemax
I didn't speak of variations in one species...... i spoke of different species in one genus.
Please pay attention to what i wrote...
konohanominato 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@konohanominato Your not explaining yourself properly... "I didn't speak of variations in one species...... i spoke of different species in one genus." What is the difference between different species within one kind, and variations within one kind? "Macro-evolution is speciation---- when 2 different species come about from the same species...." That is still considered micro evolution...
thinktothemax 9 months ago
@thinktothemax so i take it youve done research
konohanominato 9 months ago
@konohanominato lol yeah... It's a personal study for the truth.
thinktothemax 9 months ago
@thinktothemax Since micro evolution is "proven", and there is no limit on how much an organism can mutate; Why do you creationists have such a problem acknowledging macro evolution? Macro evolution is simply the result of generations upon generations of micro evolution.
godlynessdog 9 months ago
@godlynessdog Five big reasons why: Genetic Limits, Cyclical Change, Irreducible Complexity, Nonviability of Transitional Forms, Molecular Isolation. But dont fret I have a new theory! This whole universe is made up of fractals and to get a fractal it has to be balanced so everything was made all at once or say 6 days. From the basic starting fractals such as adams all the way to us humans which leads way to the conciseness fractal, thats why if we are unbalanced when we die we don't go on.
thinktothemax 9 months ago
@thinktothemax There is no such thing as genetic limits. Irreducible complexity has already been disproven, more over it has nothing to do with macro evolution. Non-viability of transitional forms? How are transitional forms not viable? Fractals have nothing to do with anything. Explain to me how humans are fractals, because we most definitely are not.
godlynessdog 9 months ago
@godlynessdog Im not getting into the macro evolution Im sick of talking about it. I can give you great responses to all your questions that will only lead to more but in the end it will be our views that stop it from continuing not facts. Fractals... Alright well it's a work in progress... You know what I can't give you a good metaphor to help you understand with such a small area to write in... Just think about what I siad... really hard... Not saying you dumb it's just really deep...
thinktothemax 9 months ago
@godlynessdog I hope you got my first message, it's not showing that it got posted. But this isn't why im commenting again it's because I thought of an easy way to help you maybe get it how we are a type of fractal... ready? ... How are we not a fractal? Actually you know it's good you asked me oposite to that because I may be using the wrong word... how about "branch"... Yup that's it. Branch.
thinktothemax 9 months ago
@godlynessdog This whole universe is made up of branches and to get a branch it has to be balanced first to grow so everything was made all at once or say 6 days. From the basic starting branches such as adams all the way to us humans which leads way to the conciseness branch, thats why if we are unbalanced when we die we don't go on, the branch we are ment move on to doesn't grow, but if you balanced you do.
thinktothemax 9 months ago
@thinktothemax from reading your blogs, i see that you have a good hook. Im looking for the vowles A or E.
Please pm me so i can too experence and talk to god. I haven't heard from the all mighty since i ran out of pcp!
Please respond asap!!!!!!!!!
Desdenova262 9 months ago
@thinktothemax What you're saying is not scientific. Maybe I wasn't clear earlier; I wanted you to provide scientific evidence. I didn't want you to preach to me. Everything you are saying has no evidence supporting it,
godlynessdog 9 months ago
@godlynessdog You must have missed my other comments... You said "how are humans fractals" so I was going to explain then I decided that was the wrong word, I should use "branch" then I rewrote my first paragraph using branch to help but now you think im preaching lol. The evidence is that things are currently overall balanced and when you observe it, its like a tree branching out bigger and bigger and/or smaller and smaller. Im taking solid facts and looking at it in a different way thats it.
thinktothemax 9 months ago
@thinktothemax 'Im taking solid facts"
Well then, you must know that Evolution is the best theory we have to date. And i suppose thats why it is taught around the world in all major colleges. Its the only theory that has solid facts!
Desdenova262 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Desdenova262 That's your opinion and "And i suppose thats why it is taught around the world in all major colleges." is an Appeal to the Majority Fallacy. I understand to the best of your knowledge you think it's the only theory that has solid facts. I could picture you saying Well then, you must know that the flat earth is the best theory we have to date. And i suppose thats why it is taught around the world in all major colleges. Its the only theory that has solid facts! No point in this.
thinktothemax 9 months ago
« it's the only theory that has solid facts »
Well, currently, it's the only theory - period. There are no other testable explanatory models for this set of phenomena. The last alternative that was a candidate for the position was Lamarckian evolutionary theory, and that got rejected when we learned more about heredity.
XGralgrathor 8 months ago
@Desdenova262 The Bible is all Facts proven more true everyday by Real Science,Archeology,History etc.
If You dont know Gods living word You have no idea what the truth is.
coolvideo28 9 months ago
Honestly, I couldn't watch this through to the end... It's just too bloody depressing.
I guess this is where creationism (and every religion for that matter) belongs though: a bloody freakshow museum of oddities.
marumaru54 9 months ago
Hmm... what if the flood were some kind of cosmic event, a flood of some kind of radiation, and the Earth IS Noah's Ark? (I like sci-fi... regardless, nice vid.)
MichaelHTillman 10 months ago
@MichaelHTillman When it comes to ancient myths everything is taken literally. It's not like the writer of the Bible was Hemingway and something and wanted a bunch of complex metaphors and crap. It's a myth. You are supposed to just eat it up. The earth was created in seven days. Adam and Eve ate an fruit that somehow determine man's fate. God sent a flood and gave mercy to only one single group of people. etc. etc. These are bullshit that people can move on with life not knowing.
shoulderkolibri 9 months ago
Comment removed
MichaelHTillman 9 months ago
@shoulderkolibri Hey Koli. :-) I was just positing something because the idea hadn't occurred to me - there may be many books with that as a premise. However, myths are often metaphors. Take Job and Utnapisthim - both can be said to be myths, both can be said to be metaphors. To say that a story in the Bible or in the Tao te Ching isn't as complex as Hemingway is giving Hemingway a lot of credit, though, as he had a few more thousand years of literary critique from which to benefit.
MichaelHTillman 9 months ago
I believe this! Much evidence is place as propaganda instead. The bible says the earth brought up animals according to there kind & they just found dinosaur blood now how can that be if the earth is 4.5 billion years old. This is not even a matter for debate its obvious now science disproves your theory.
BraveActivist 10 months ago
There may be nothing in this world that is dumber than a creationist.
animecha 10 months ago
How about the differences in people. Those differences alone have happen in a short amount time not over billions of years. How great is our GOD!!!!!
ThetruthEc 10 months ago
creationists have evidence. What do you cotton pickin evolutionists have? Nothing but conjecture and hearsay. Where's your book by God? Oh right, he doesn't speak to liars!
Me and my family are driving 9 hours on Tuesday to this museum
LoryLandskipper 10 months ago
I laughed so hard I vomited! How can even a mentally challenged person believe this!
talover403 10 months ago
I wouldnt be caught dead working in this museum.
JDaGame 10 months ago
"Nice to see they're backing up their ideas with evidence"
HAHA LOLd so hard.
Nice job btw
2Pains1Love 10 months ago
At 3:59 your math is wrong.
Genesis 7:2-3
2 Take with you seven pairs of every kind of clean animal, a male and its mate, and one pair of every kind of unclean animal, a male and its mate, 3 and also seven pairs of every kind of bird, male and female, to keep their various kinds alive throughout the earth.
There were a lot more than just two of every kind of animal, which opens up a lot more genetic possibilities .
ronin24113 10 months ago
@ronin24113 Your wrong, check out my book called " Lenesis"
Lenesis 7:2-3
Creationism is wrong, and evolution is correct, never give in to lousy scripture such as Genesis.
DoNotLaughAtMe 10 months ago
@ronin24113 Still a problem when we know the minimum viable population for a species is usually in the hundreds and even then with human intervention it's difficult to prevent an extinction. :)
animecha 10 months ago
Dude, you could have saved yourself a lot of time and energy if you just said....THE STORY OF NOAH IS JUST PLAIN RETARDED! A giant ark? The planet flooded? Two of every animal on a boat? Really people? Creationists are fucking idiots.
cutes22 10 months ago
It never fails to be hilarious how science continues to prove them wrong, but rather than admit that they are wrong, they'll just make more and more and more convoluted explanations which require jury rigging at every single point by their imaginary sociopath in the clouds.It really is just moving into the realm of the staggeringly, jaw-droppingly pathetic.
pyrespirit 10 months ago
The irony is soooo great here.
Anti-evolutionist claim: evolution is the belief that a dog gives birth to a cat!
Which is a pretty accurate estimate of SUPER-EVOLUTION.
No evolutionist would believe that and it would even disprove current evolutionary models.
Oh the irony.
"GODDIDITGODDIDITGODDIDITGODDIDITGODDIDITGODDIDITGODDIDITGODDIDITGODDIDITGODDIDITGODDIDITGODDIDITGODDIDITGODDIDITGODDIDITGODDIDITGODDIDITGODDIDITGODDIDITGODDIDITGODDIDITGODDIDITGODDIDIT" - Creationist museum
FHomeBrew 10 months ago
@cdk007 dude... God Aint exist.
and if u ask how the world begin then... watch some stephen hawking videos...
it just like space u cant realize that the universe is endless human mind just cant realize it!!! i guess u cant realize god aint exist too...
DarkGlobusO 11 months ago
I don't mean to sound rude or uneducated. but this video author really needs to learn math. "200-300 species in the first few centuraries" centuraries being 100 years. so afew of them (likes call 3 afew) would mean that there would have to be 1 new species born each year. how does that possible require a new seperation event every 4mins? can someone please explain that one too me?
kradrol 11 months ago
All Creationists should be banned from using all technology, and from receiving modern medical treatment.
They should also be forced to pay a "Noah tax" that will go straight to the public education system to make up for the damage they do to society's intellectual well-being.
OrthodoxDarwinist 11 months ago
If according to evolution that is so then how does bacteria apparently evolve so quickly?.
You cant have it both ways.
Evolution is an invention moonlighting as a discovery.
midknighted 11 months ago
@midknighted You need to go educate you're self.
BurtonKelly0 11 months ago
@BurtonKelly0 I have and that's why ive reached this conclusion, you need know what you're talking about.
midknighted 11 months ago
@BurtonKelly0 No, I do not, going back to you're original comment. The speed of evolution depends upon the rate at which the species repoduces. It's still a slow process because it goes at the rate for every one individual born. For example bacteria multiply very fast and have been know to adapt over time to their environment; and viruses for that matter.
BurtonKelly0 11 months ago
@BurtonKelly0
Like Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), it can evolve resistance very quickly to antiretrovirals, & patient can go through 10 medications, and virus population becomes resistant to all of them.
A new therapy uses natural selection to its advantage by, after Highly Active Antiretroviral Treatment (HAART) where the person takes multiple drugs, stopping all of them at once. The wildtype virus then re-propagates, Then they smash it with a massive cocktail of drugs.
OrthodoxDarwinist 11 months ago
@midknighted E. Coli generation time; 17 minutes. Human generation time; ~20 years. In the time that you have 1 human generation, you have roughly 620,000 generations of E. Coli. Plenty of time for a comparitively faster evolutionary track on the microbial stage.
pyrespirit 10 months ago
derp supa evolushun
TheToxicRadio 11 months ago
One more thing, Adaptation is real and people and animals do adapt to different regions because adaptation is like a survival mechanism, thats why you have the same types of animals but different appearances. But humans were not monkeys, or apes, at all. They physical appearances change because of the region they live in. If i took adaptation and added extra to the beginning then I can trick people into believing that there is no God, and this my friends is called Mortal Kombat "Deception".
tlrflyguy860 11 months ago
The true definition of science. Hmph Hmmm Science is understanding how God works through biology, chemistry, and etc. Evolution is not from God and thats why you people(yes, You People) dont believe what the bible says. You want proof and you demand proof. lol.Do think God will stoop down to the level of people that demand proof from him when there is enough proof in your tiny little bodies, around this whole planet, and in the Bible thats has been misused by false prophets? No, wake up people.
tlrflyguy860 11 months ago
@tlrflyguy860 No it isn't, Science isn't about understanding god, it's about understanding about the physical world and how it works. Finding true answer.
Religion is a lie, it NEVER done anything good, it never gave us any advancement.
If you were born in Pakistan, you would of been Muslim, born in Classical Greek, you would believe in Zeus, Born in USA, Christian, Born in Aztec society, you would believe in huit..., born in India, Hindu. Born in China, Buddhism.
DoNotLaughAtMe 11 months ago
@DoNotLaughAtMe Well, sir you said dont laugh at you and now I am sorry if I hurt you and forgive me for laughing. I dont believe in religion sir, I believe in God and I believe and have accepted Jesus as my savior because he died for my sins and now Im a new person. Um no I wouldn't with my personality I would question most things and I would do my research on things and not just go with what Im taught. Sorry, your argument is irrelevant because I know arabs that believe in God and Jesus so...
tlrflyguy860 11 months ago
@tlrflyguy860 Hah, Religion damage me, it gave me that name. We are taught these things because it is necessarily for survival, I wasn't really taught evolution, I was taught adaptations. I'm 14. Yes animals evolve to suit their surroundings, We lost our fur because of fire that kept us warm, and we started wearing clothes hundreds of thousands of years ago.
Believe in things without evidence isn't good.
its too hard to explain evolution on 500 limit, watch some youtube video to find out.
DoNotLaughAtMe 11 months ago
@DoNotLaughAtMe Forgive me my bad I didnt know you were fourteen. Thats why you dont understand anything lol cause you dont know and caught up in the things around you. You are in school and these things are new to you and this is exactly what I mean people if you teach someone something when they are young it does stick to them but, when they put no effort into finding the real truth then they get caught up in things lie evolution. In due time you willl understand just dont be closed minded lol
tlrflyguy860 11 months ago
There is a difference between Evoltution and adaptation.... Super evolutionlol....
tlrflyguy860 11 months ago
Nice video. One minor correction, though: at 2:00 you said it was an argument from ignorance. The example you gave was more like an argument from personal incredulity (i.e. "I personally find X to be unlikely or impossible, therefore X is false").
Also, I loved the "fine print" you showed at 2:57. That is an ad hoc fallacy if I ever saw one! "Oh no, my argument is sinking. I'll just pull this "fact" out of my ass to try and salvage my failing argument". LOL
tekbarrier 11 months ago
Comment removed
buxtehude76 11 months ago
Do you really fail to see that this is the opposite of evolution. This is like taking two dogs and breeding them over time to end up with poodles. you can't do it in reverse. With each step, there is less information, for the things "bred out" are just that... gone. The theory of evolution is just the opposite; it is based on something that we have never seen happen... additional information happening because of genetic mutation that proves to be beneficial. It just doesn't happen.
buxtehude76 11 months ago
@buxtehude76 well said
reddranger 11 months ago
@buxtehude76 I have been wondering why evolution isn't fact yet. I guess that is why is a theory. I guess we still need more evidence, but we still have a mountain of evidence unlike creationists, nothing at all.
DoNotLaughAtMe 11 months ago
@DoNotLaughAtMe its not fact because its from satan and only in the america its stand really strong... That why it isnt fact and why they are tryin to push a NEW WORLD ORDER so they can deceive the masses upon masses of people but, not so much just the few that will be left When Jesus comes back cause their plan wil fail. But they push it because they already decieved a whole nation. Do you know what a nephilim is? oh i gues that fairy tale
tlrflyguy860 11 months ago
@tlrflyguy860 Actually I'm 100% sure evolution is fact. Mountain of evidence, unlike creationism.
DoNotLaughAtMe 11 months ago
@DoNotLaughAtMe Faith is the substance of things hoped for and the evidence of things not seen. lol. Im 100% percent sure that people did not come from monkeys and a big bowl of soup that cooked up. Thats why its still theory. Im pretty sure the evidence of paluxy river in texas proves alot of evolution wrong, Im pretty sure if you dont understand the bible you try to find out why people believe and have spiritual evidence that you dont have. 100% sure no? were you there when God created.
tlrflyguy860 11 months ago
@tlrflyguy860 Of course we didn't come from monkeys! We came from apes, we share a common ancestors with a