I will try to explain this as easy as I can, God did die but he had the power to take up his life again.Jesus went to hell which is the second Death according to the bible.this was done for all of us.we could not keep the law so God made a way for us to be forgiven.it goes to show how much he loves us that one would lay his life down to save us from our sin.there is none righteous no not one.we are all sinners and deserve hell.but he made a way for us to go to heaven
(25) to the banquet(the Jews) did not come,did not accept the invitation(im paraphrasing) and so the lord of the banquent told his servants to go out and invite ALL the towns people(the gentiles, all those who were NOT God's chosen people, who were not israelite),there's more to the parable, but this is to show that Jesus' salvation is for ALL sinners, and not only the Jews...
...i could say so much more, but ive already taken up 25 lines, please read all I had to say, starting with the 1st post
reflection of God almighty's promise to avraham. "We"(God's people) were all considered Jews,or israelites; until Yeshua(Jesus) came. Those who believed that he fulfilled all the scripture and was the promised messiah were called Christians, those who did not remained Jews. In addition, those who wernt even Jews were allowed to believe in jesus as the christ and be saved, he died for the world, for all of human-kind. there's a parable Jesus spoke that talks about how the people origanly invited
ever we bess shall be blessed and whatever we curse shall be cursed, but ALL who believe in the name of Jesus, that he was the messiah share in the promise (another prophesy in the old testament is that God's messiah would save ALL men from their sins, and not JUST his chosen people). Jesus himself said "whatever you bind on earth in my name on shall be bound in heaven(in the spirit,from which this physical world manifest) and what ever you loose on earth in my name shall be loosed in heaven; a
is why when the anti-christ comes,being given the power the preform "signs and wonders" a man who will be an earthly ruler, many will be decieved. God's elite however, those who have faith and know the truth in Jesus, the christ, will know that he is false, and will be looking for OUR savior to return in the sky with the clouds. Because this is spiritual,now, not only the decendents of avraham(the jews) share in the promise of being blessed,his children being like the sand of the earth, what
(21)version of the story, its like the quran was designed specificly to take away salvation and have us rely completly on ourselves for our own salvation.my problem with Judaism is despite all the prophesys fulfilled they dont believe that yeshua(the hebbrew for Jesus, which is greek) was the promised messiah. they only saw with their eyes, not with their faith. they saw a man, not a king, like david or the likes, and are still looking for an earthly king to reign over them till this day( which
version of the story, its like the quran was designed specificly to take away salvation and have us rely completly on ourselves for our own salvation.my problem with Judaism is despite all the prophesys fulfilled they dont believe that yeshua(the hebbrew for Jesus, which is greek) was the promised messiah. they only saw with their eyes, not with their faith. they saw a man, not a king, like david or the likes, and are still looking for an earthly king to reign over them till this day( which is
(20) because I need to know more about Islam, Im actualy getting ready to read the Quran right now and still only know bits and pieces) remain UNFULFILED according to islamic faith. The prophesy that "one would come to save God's people form their sins" remains unfulfilled without Jesus' death on the cross. The prophesy that the messiah,hebrew for the christ, would come from the line of David remains unfulfilled without Joeseph. Both of these KEY components are not found in the quran's
temple so that through us God may deliver his word). Joeseph, mary's husband fulfilled the prophesy that the coming king who's kingdom would never end would be through the line of David; Jeseph mary's husband was a child(or decendent) of King David, and without Joeseph the prophesy remains unfulfilled. Thats my only qualm with Islam (and Judaism as well) Acording to Islam, many of the propheisys in the old testemant(which i believe you believe in as well,please, correct me if im wrong
through mary, came into the world. We must live and see with a spiritual eye, according to a spiritual nature, and the only way to do so is by faith. Some see a man born by a woman, but in truth she was chosen to do God's will, to bring forth the living word in her womb.She was marly the vessel by which the word came into the world, and so we must see things with a spiritual eye(just like we ought not to live for ourselves, but be LIVING temples for the lord our God to dwell in,a clean and holy
(17)before the coming of the promised one, who's kingdom would endure forever and ever(amen)) when God had to swear by himself, because no one else was worthy for him to swear by. It is the same with Jesus. In oder to have a sutible sacrifice to re-establish his relationship with man that he wanted from the beggining he had to have a sacrifice worthy enough; so he sent his word, which WAS himself and CAME FROM himself, his word which is spotless and without defect, flawless. so his word, birthed
(16) people dont live holy enough to hear from God themselves, so God has to set a man apart from the rest (like moses, ezekiel, isaiah,etc) and have him live to a higher standard to speak god's word) was that our sacrifice to the lord had to be clean, without spot or blemish, no broken bones and without defect. We men are spiritual beings and we are all corrupt. In the old testament(again, our record of the israelites(sp) God's chosen people through which he would fulfill his promis with,
forgive a sin, but not the man (its like giving a quarter for something thats worth a dollar, while it will suffice for part of the debt you owe, it just cant cover it all). So why not a man for a man? that would be good enough right? thats a fair trade, a dollar for a dollar right? Well one of the requirements of our sacrifices that we had to give to the priest (im sorry, i think i said prophet earlier, a prophet is one who speaks with God and then delivers the message to the people because the
that came before us when he created "light," the lucifer(which means bearer of light) and his angles who after the fall became satan(the accuser) and fallen angles, he LOVES us, when he created us, instead of saying it is good(like he said of everything else he created), he said it is VERY good. So, in order to establish that relationship that he wanted with us from the beggining, he needed a sacrifice. animals wernt good enough, sacrificing an animal wasnt the equivalent of a man, it could
(13) or God would come to him or appear to him, but he wasnt continuly walking in his pressence. Moses conversed with God in the moantain where he recieved the 10 commandments, but as time went on, our ability to converse with God grew less and less, more distant, and this is not what God wanted at all. We were created in God's image, we were created in the image of GOD almighty, we were meant to walk with him and have eternal life, not live so lowly and share in the same fate as his creation
(12) but in every instance, in order for God to not have to destroy us a sacrifice had to be given, to attone for our sins, in our stead, but as stated earlier, while these sacrifices suficed, man was always sinning, and we grew more wicked, which pushed us more away from God's origanal intention for us. while adam(named adam after the hebrew adamah or ground from which adam was made) and eve could talk and walk with God and be in his pressence, avraham(the hebrew for abraham) had to meet God
(11) the prophet, who would then lay their sacrifice on the alter (according to God's specifications) and sacrifice it to God. In some instances this was an animal sacrifice, in some instances it was grain, but it was always out of what the people had, and if they didnt have it, there were other things they could give(in some instances). Their were different sacrifices for different things, a guilt offering was different from a sin offering, a sin offering different from a fellowship offering
(10) in the name of God's one and only son we are saved..."Jesus said I am the way(to the father) the truth(by which we can see) and the life(through him we have life) NO MAN comes to the father EXCEPT by me(the word of God, thats what Jesus is). Why did God send his Son to die instead of some prophet? Before Jesus came (everything we have recorded in the old testament of the Bible) God required a sacrifice for sin. According to the law of moses sacrifices of what we had were given to
(9)"For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life"...the verse goes on to say..."For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to SAVE the world through him. Whoever believes in him IS NOT condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned ALREADY because he has NOT BELIEVED in the name of God's one and only Son"....again, because of sin we are ALL condemned to hell, but by believing
(8) he would send an army of angles....but i do this to fulfill what is written, and also, in another verse where he is questioned about being a king he says "my kingdom is NOT OF THIS WORLD, if it were, would not my men come to my side (paraphrase)"...) the fact is Jesus GAVE his life, God our HEAVENLY father(we call him that because he gave us all life,our father) loved us so much, and does not desire for us to die though it is the punishment in accordance with sin, that he GAVE his son.
(7) we were created in the almighty himself's image) we had to be judged by the same grade. we all deserve hell because of our sin, but because God LOVED us(its out of love, not butchery) he GAVE his son, his son GAVE his life ( "Jesus said that no one takes his life away from him, and that he gives it up willingly, in another verse where peter tries to rescue him from the soldiers who are about to take him off to be crusified he says "dont you know that if i wanted to i could ask my father, and
(6) have eternal life." ...This was God's origanal intintion for mankind(when the bible uses the word man, it uses the word "adam which refers to human-kind, and not just man, or "ish" himself) to have eternal life, but when both adam and havana(eve's origanal hebrew name) sinned, they had to be punished accordingly. The punishment that God gave the devil and his angles for rebelion was hell,the lake of fire, and being that we are considered ABOVE the devil and his angles,(a created thing, while
and so they join a faith where hell doesnt exist, where EVERYONE is saved). You (I use this term genericly) come to your own conclusions on God's word instead of asking God for understanding, but instead of asking why would God do such a thing the real question should be why? help me to understand...the answer is simple, and is found in one of our most famouse christian verses..."For God so LOVED the world, that he gave his one and only son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish, but
(4) good to out-weigh the bad, and that God might find me acceptable on the day of judgment. What I see in most other faiths that are an off-set of christianity (christianity came first, then Islam, again, much respect to it) is a lack of FAITH. "how could God allow his son to be "butchered" (as I have heard some say) like that. You dont understand it and so you find a religion that suits your needs (the same with Jehova witnesses, many are afraid to go to hell, they say its impossible to change
(3) and that their body belongs to their husband, not to be put on display to the world, I personly fast and pray often, and know the power that comes from it, and I too READ and STUDY my word, and ask God for guidance and in doing so, have recieved understanding. The only thing i DIS-AGREE with Islam about IS the fact that you believe Jesus DID NOT die on the cross. According to my belief Jesus' death on the cross is my salvation. Without it, my only way into heaven is to hope that I do enough
(2) it out, it is part of us before it leaves our spirit. We ARE the words we speak(we can only speak what we know) our words are with us, and our words ARE us. It sounds like a riddle but i expalined it as best i can. Many of the comments left by christians on islamic pages are filled with ignorance and very embarrising, calling mohammed a pig and a child molester solves nothing, and i apologize for them. I in fact respect Islam. I respect how you treat your women, that you take care of them,
i want to clarify some things that not even many christians understand, this is what is meant by "three in one." If I speak a word, it comes from me, it leaves out of me, but it is me. Spiritualy speaking(for those who know of heavenly things) your words have life, and your word comes from you, God's words have life. Jesus is God's word. Jesus came from God. When God said "let there be light" (etc) the word existed, and Jesus was this word made flesh. Though a word leaves us when we speak it out
ok I am making a comment to you in regards to your LOVE OF CHILD SEX. You are a discrace to the WORLD because you think its ok to have sex with a 9 year old and so is your PIG PROPHET or should I say FALSE PROPHET. I wish you could go to the web site of SOS MOROCCO and see how confused your sisters and brothers of Islam are>>
It is very interesting that rather than actually try and answer the questions posed in the video or make a video related comment that you prefer to make some typical anti-Islamic statements.
You make typically false statements "your LOVE OF CHILD SEX", "you think its ok to have sex with a 9 year old" and then display your true hateful nature with your reliance on abuse "your PIG PROPHET".
I would like to thank you for reaffirming for me that I do not want to be like you.
In terms of confusion you need to do more than rely on a website to demonstrate that.
Some really confused people believe that God blamed all of mankind for the sin of just two people and then set the price of the sin being removed so high that no-one could pay, so God then became His Own Son and killed Himself to pay Himself. As if blood thirstiness is love?
Now that's what I call confused.
However to believe that God will forgive sin if you sincerely repent is clarity, no blood needed.
@thefotfoundation its not that God blamed the whole world for the sin of one man, you mis-understand, sin is individual, and those who sin share the same punishment as the first man who sinned(adam),death. There was one who walked with God his entire life (enoch) who was simply taken up into heaven, he never died, which is proof that God does not blindly punish everyone for one man's sin, its simply that death is the punishment for sin, and all who sin share in this same punishment.
@thefotfoundation As time went on mankind grew more wicked, i dont know if your familiar with the story of noah and how he was told to build an ark by God to save himself and his family from a flood that god would bring to destroy the inhabitants of the earth, but this was because of their own wickedness, noah's righteousness is what saved him. When sodam and gommorah was destroyed by fire, lot's righteousness(along with abraham's prayers) saved him. So you see, we do not take another man's
@thefotfoundation punishment, but our own. As far as sacrifice was concerned, both this and the law was set in place merely to dicipline God's chosen people, the israelites, just as an earthly father dicipline's his children by establishing rules of his own house hold. Sacrifice of one's own possessions was merely an ACTION that showed one's commitment to the lord, I have been grieved at things iv'e done and given things to my loved one's in addition to an apology and repentance(never doing it
@thefotfoundation again) eventually wickedness spread even into this, and sin increased so much so amongst God's people to the point that the israelites sacrifices meant nothing to him, when a father establishes rules for his household, its not so that they will blindly follow the rules but always see what they can get away with and see what it takes to be forgiven, but so that they will eventually be disciplined into the right type of thinking and grow, and eventually no longer need "rules"
@thefotfoundation "rules," because discipline develops character, and after walking in accordance with the laws for so long(which are given with specific intention in mind in the first place, for example, training a child not to eat messy with a bib at first,until he masters this, then is able to go to the next step) he/she will naturally become all that that father wanted him/her to become, and he/she will then be able to walk and talk with the father himself as an adult,as a peer,and no longer
@thefotfoundation as a child.When a parent punishes a child,the goal is not to punish the child but so that the child will learn,but if the child doesn't learn, what do you do?Continue to punish him/her?The parent loves him/her,and will try whatever methods available to bring his child to the light of understanding, that way there will be no more need for rebellion,after all,9 times out of 10 the child rebells out of ignorance,and goes down a path that he/she doesn't even know is bad for him/her
@thefotfoundation so instead of us all sharing in the same punishment God sent Jesus, to show us the way, and to die on the cross for our sins. we who sin are no longer slaves of death, but made alive in christ, and in repentance and faith in the son, will one day be resurrected to have ever-lasting life with him.
@QueenBN1B i am a christian myself, and what you just did is very ignorant, not embarissing but ignorant. What will insulting a person do to prove anything? Have you read your Bible? What does it say? Did Jesus blandly insult priest who got the scripture wrong? When questioned about the truth did he not give it to them? You need to read your bible, and let the word of God dwell in you, that way you will have a response that will bring life, your insults only come back on YOURSELF.
the Old Testament was written thousand years before the bible..and it first comanment comand u to worship one god that u shall not depict him or asociate a man or anything else wth him..yet do u follow it?
no
so bascly beein old @manuscript doesnt mean anything to u..it does..when it goes in ur way of thinking..
The second questions: "The Lamb(sinless) paid for the sin of all men with his blood and body, for the salvation(unity with God) of all men." It was the ultimate act of His love. The wages of sin is death(separation from God, Rom 6:23). God saved us (descendants of Adam) from all our sins through the Lamb, Jesus Christ.
I will give short answers here due to character count limits, if you want more detail, please let me know. To your first question: "Because only God is without sin." Jesus is the Lamb of God. We see in Gen 4, that God accepts the lamb of Abel(given in faith), not the fruits of labour that Cain offered(good deeds). This lamb refers to Christ. And Abraham was to sacrifice Isaac, instead God gave him a ram(Gen 22). Jesus is that ram & we can look to Him & see Him on the cross for us, now & forever.
Hi, tff and peace be with you :) Thank you for your good questions. I understand that you as a Muslim do not believe in the trinity, nor in the concept of the sinful nature of man due to the actions of Adam & Eve, am I correct? From a Christian point of view there are indeed answers to your questions, though they might not conform with Islam. I want to make sure, b4 posting anything else, that I have deep respect for Islam, and don't want to convert, but to share my relationship with the Lord.
jihad means a strive or struggle nothing to do with wot u just said lol u need to do some reseach and allah is not weak since he sent jesus down and all the rest of the prophetes unlike the bible atleast there arnt any pornography in the quran lol hav u ever thought about that
i think jesus was just a man that felt he was chosen to speak the truth. if you think about it.. arent we all the word of god in flesh form? we all want to find out who created us and why things are.
In Islam, Jesus (pbuh) is The Word of God because Allah said one word and Jesus was and this word is "Be". Jesus is also a very poverful prophet because he's a miracle of God and he'll come back to save believers (muslims) from the Anti-Christ and from Gog and Magog people.
Allah is the greatest and peace be uppon you brothers.
yeah the pigs, the followers of the Antichrist, The Dajjal, and to break the cross to show to the christians that they were wrong of worshipping him
Do you think God love those who worship and thank other Gods than Him ? this is what you believe, bit God didn't created ALL THIS UNIVERSE and sustain us with all what we need as food and roofs to accept that people thank Jesus or even Satan of that
It makes all senses, and if you read the Quran and learn about the Sunna you will understand
didnt JEsus killed pigs according to the Bible too...and u consider him to b GOD...so if i apply your logic than y did your GOD created them if he wanted to throw them from the top of the hill???????
Either Muhammad's use of 'we' and 'our' is a mere literary turn of phrase, in which case the Quran is as much theatrical fable as reliable history, or the words were announced by God [or god], in which case there is deep theological significance. There are real problems with the Quran. Example, [Surah 18:89-98] where Alexander the Great is described as a Muslim who lived to a ripe old age.
The use of the Majestic Plural has been adequately shown above. None can be more majestic than the ONE God. Now once again you flit to another topic: Needless to say that the Quran does not mention Alexander the great but refers to Dhul Qarnayn. Please read Surah 18:89-98. Peace, fot
The commentators througout Muhammadean history have always taken 18:89-98 to be a reference to Alexander. Tafsir al-Jalalayn agrees as does the Encyclopaedia of Islam, New Edition, Vol. IV, 1978
Again your use of the term Muhammadean highlights your true Christian "love" for Muslims. I have already answered this, see commentary quote below which explains why Alexander the great is not mention in the Quran. Peace, fot
You can't escape that fact that the 'Quran' is finally being textually analyzed under the hot light of science and theology, and being found to be less than you personally think it ought to be.
The Quran has been analyzed for over 1400yrs by Muslims. Theology of the Quran is purely Monotheistic, nothing to worry about there. No proven science has yet disagreed with Quranic scientific descriptions. I have read with some amusement orientalist theories about the Quran needless to say conjecture is no threat. Peace, fot
Now that the Quran is being scrutinized by free thinkers who don't see the death cult of Muhammad in its idealised form, but rather by its own merits, we'll see what the future holds. Science in the Quran? So the Sun sets in a muddy pool and the Egytians employed crusifiction?
"Mohammadean", "Hubaal" and now "death cult". I have had enough of this "conversation". I have just seen you page and blog that clearly shows your hatred for Islam and Muslims. If you wish to make any further points do so in a video response and I will take it from there. Peace, fot
Portion of commentary on 18:83 - Dhul-Qarnayn: "This last point is extremely important-for it is precisely the Qur'anic stress on his faith in God that makes it impossible to identify Dhu 'l-Qarnayn, as most of the commentators do, with Alexander the Great..All those historic personages were pagans and worshipped a plurality of deities as a matter of course, whereas our Dhu 'l-Qarnayn is depicted as a firm believer in the One God". Peace, fot
Now that the Quran is finally undergoing the kind of close scrutiny that the Bible has been undergoing for 2,000 years, you are running away from centuries of Muhammadean traditons in order to reinvent your tribal story run amuck.
Your mistake is that you think Quranic commentary is the same as tradition (Hadith). Its not. There is no tradition that names Dhul-Qarnayn as Alexander the great. The Bible has been closely scrutinized only since it became available to the public in a mass produced form after the invention of the printing press in the 1500's (I think). Peace, fot
Your hate for Islam and Muslims is so palpable, the shame and pity of the situation is that you claim to believe in and follow someone that you say taught "love your enemy". Peace, fot
Dividing God in the way you discuss is a reminder of earlier heresies that spang up in the Gnsotic traditions in the early Church [Docetism]. So rather than study the heresy of Muhammadism for the answers, try picking up a commentary on the Christian faith. Christ was indeed the divine lamb and co-equal with God.
I appreciate what you say hence the confusion when Christians divide the Indivisible God to prevent the idea that God could die on the cross. Also if Jesus (pbuh) is God then he can not be co-equal with Himself as he IS himself ans there can therefore be no comparison. I try not to use non-Christian sources when studying Christian theology. Peace, fot
You don't use Chrsitian sources when considering Chrsitian theology. No womder you don't get it. I use Muhammadean sources when considering 'Islam' and your 'religion' comes up short every time.
I wrote: QUOTE "I try not to use non-Christian sources when studying Christian theology." UNQUOTE. Please read carefully. I very much doubt any Muslim source could give you the ideas you have about Islam. Peace, fot
Your negative statement didnt make sense in the context of the following sentence: "You don't use Chrsitian sources when considering Chrsitian theology. No womder you don't get it.". But if I mis-understand what you say I apologise for mis-understanding. Please provide me with a Christian source which can explain Christian Theology to me, to your liking. Peace, fot
Consider this: I am 'Jesse' and 'Jesse' is 'Me' and if you are looking at 'Jesse' then 'Jesse' is 'He' and 'You'. All these perspectves are coequal as they all refer to one distinct person, the guy who wrote this email.
The analogy is false, demonstrably and I will demonstrate: If I kill "Jesse" can either "He", "Me" or "you" bring him back to life? Can "Jesse" have a different Will to "He", "Me" or "You"? (Gethsemane - Not as "I" Will but a "You" Will". There is no analogy for the trinity, none. Peace, fot
The Trinity is in the word 'Elohim' and in Genesis 18 and 19. All of this was fully and finally revealed in Christ Jesus our LORD, Shepard and Master. Even Muhammad could not hide from the Trinity by his constant use of 'our' and 'we' in his alleged Quran.
It is interesting and telling that you try and attribute Trinity to Jewish and Muslim Scriptures which both dont believe in a Trinity. The royal plural is not an alien concept but you seem not to be aware of it. Know that God is One. Peace, fot
Muhammad's use of the 1st person plural is unmistakable. As is the plural 'Elohim' as it is used in the creation narrative. Shrug it off all you like. The Jews dismissed Christ, and look what happened to then precious temple and nation 2,000 years ago. God forgave them in 1948, and the world is entering the final stage of history.
No shrugging required, the royal plural is standard grammar even in English. If you would like an example please say so. If God unished the Jews for not accepting Jesus (pbuh) but of course the Jews still dont accept Jesus (pbuh) so why did He forgive them in 1948? How do you know they were punished or forgiven? Peace, fot
Roman Emperors used the 'royal plural' often, and while the audience hears a single person speaking, the speaker is refering to the office in which he speaks, and the royal family he represents. There is also an 'editorial we', et al. As Muhammad was illiterate, we have no idea which he was refering to. Or, even Muhammad couldn't escape the Trinity. Jews were forgiven by getting Israel back, obviously. Read the real Prophets sometime. As prophesied, the world in taking sides for/against Israel.
Again, the royal plural is a plural of Majesty and not number. Example: This is (singular) my friend. These are (plural) my friends. You are (plural) my friend (singular). The plural "are" is used for ONE friend to raise the status of that friend. Plural of Majesty. Peace, fot
Again, you obfiscate and evade. The implications of the plural are clear in both the OT and in 'Quran'. Also, how is the word 'are' in your example indicative of the plural? Bad example! The verb [are] has to agree with the nouns in number [friend]. You are trying to muddy the waters with confusion, in order to [1]avoid answering the question on Alexander the Great, and [2] admit to Trinity.
Obviously you dont understand that the word "are" is actually plural, as I have explained in the example above. The Trinity is not anything that makes any sense to anyone, hence the mystery, so I am unable to accept what you cant explain. As for your quick change of topic to Dhul-Qarnayn, I have answered below. No muddying or confusion. Peace, fot
Any schholboy can tell you that the subject [nomitive] and the object [accusative] must agree in mumber. You cannot say, 'you are [pl] my friend[sing]'.
That you deny that Muslims and Jews understand their languages (Arabic and Hebrew) as using Royal Plurals when God speaks in their Scriptures (Quran and Torah) is up to you. That Muslims and Jews do not believe in a Trinity (3in1) God is sufficient. Peace, fot
You can dismiss truth all you like. My salvation isn't predicated on your acceptance of God, only that the Gospel Offer was made available by God's disciples. Also, I have commentaries, dictionaries and concordences in four languages. You can evade Muhammad's own use of the plural all you like, but the implication of the plural is clear. Muhammad just wasn't able to escape Hu'baal before his death.
Having "commentaries, dictionaries and concordences in four languages" is of no value unless you read and understand simple grammatical truths such as the royal plural used in Semetic and other languages. God is One. Again your use of "hubaal" shows your true Chrisitan "love" for Islam and Muslims. Peace, fot
Satan wants people to worship other than God. Needless to say that if you worship a tree, fish, rock, moon, star, man or woman you are worshipping other than God who is none of these things. Muslims dont supplicate to any builing but to God Above. Muslims worship nothing created, again your lack of knowledge about Islam is astounding. Peace, fot
The analogy is false, demonstrably and I will demonstrate: If I kill "Jesse" can either "He", "Me" or "you" bring him back to life? Can "Jesse" have a different Will to "He", "Me" or "You"? (Gethsemane - Not as "I" Will but a "You" Will". There is no analogy for the trinity, none. Peace, fot
Christ's burial was proceeded by ressurection, so your bickering is usless chatter. You doubt that God has such power to raise the dead, and yet think that Muhammad flew on a winged horse, which had the head of a woman and wings like Pegasus!
Of course you have avoided the fact that the analogy is false and resurrection your dead self is a contradiction and then you let out another great whooper about a winged horse with the head of a woman. lol, great imagination but again nothing to do with Islam or Muhammad (pbuh). No Muslim believes that, but you dont care what Muslims actually think it seems. Peace, fot
I can't resurrect anyhting, as I am not the Holy Spirit. See my response below. Also, please expalin Muhammad's use of the plural person [we,our] in the Qur'an. Was he making himself coequal with the god Hu'Baal, or refering to God the Father, Son and Holy Spirit?
The ressurection comment was regarding your false analogy: If the indivisible god is dead who will ressurect him? Himself? You talk about the Quran as if the speaker is Muhammad (pbuh) which of course is clearly wrong, all you need to do is actually read it. Muhammad (pbuh) is referred in the 3rd person and is not regarded as more than Human by any Muslim. Peace, fot
I soundedly responded to your false anaology already on resurrection. Now, if that which spoke to Muhammad was God, then the 'we' and 'our' are sublime references to the Trinity. If that which spoke to Muhammad was god, then even Hu'Baal of Mecca could not hide from the Trinity. Satan fell from heaven for wanting the Throne of God, and established his kingdom in Mecca on a meteorite you call Ka'ba.
I have made no analogies, see comment below. "we" & "our" are plurals of Majesty as understood by Jews and Muslims who are Monotheists. As for the fairytale about falling angels, satan and meteorites, then this is all based in your conjecture. Your continued hate and abusive nature of commenting show your true Christian "love" for others. Peace, fot
Satan is a fairytale now? Are you some stealth atheist? Everything I have said is historicaly and theologicaly sound. I see now, since I have demolished your case for Muhammad and Hu'Baal, somehow I am hateful. Nice, very nice.
Everything about Islam you have said thus far has been totally incorrect. The Kaba is not a meteorite it is a building. The fairytale is your linking together a fantastical story and then believing it to be representative of Islam. Your hatefulness is continually calling God "hubaal" (I worship the God that Jesus (pbuh) worshipped), calling Muslims "Muhammadean". There is no decency in your manner as I have usually experienced with my Christian friends. Thats a shame. Peace, fot
You want to experince indecency? Try being a Chrsitian in a Muhammadean nation, or any other kind of religious minority. That's the real shame. You Muhammadeans just can't stomach a faith whose founder shed no blood but his own.
There are at least 40 Million Christians in Muslim countries. You assertion that Muslims treat non-Muslim minorities badly is false. You seem to deny that the OT Prophets have anything to do with your Christian religion, they followed God's commandments to fight their wars. You say that this God was Jesus (pbuh). Thank you for using the term "Muhammadean" further showing your Christian "love". Peace, fot
You also fail to realise that the only non-Christian religion that makes it an article of faith to believe in Jesus (pbuh) is Islam. So Jesus (pbuh) greatness is something I love. Peace, fot
Muhammad's reasons for including Christ are twofold [1] to appeal to Christians for new converts, or [2] more likely that Muhammad himself could not fully escape the divinty of Christ and simply couldn't understant it.
As previously explained above, the Semetic languages (Hebrew & Arabic) as well as other languages including English use the royal plural to denote Majesty, not plurality in number. Of course God is ONE so is not plural. Peace, fot
Your analogy is plainly erroneous. Neither you or I have any power to resserect the dead. The Holy Spirit has no such limitation. I am sorry that you god [Hu'baal] has such limited power.
I havent made any analogies. No need to be sorry as God can not die so is never in need of resurrection. You deliberate continued use of the term hubaal as my god is not only offensive (which you know) but wrong. Muslims worship that God whom Jesus (pbuh) worshipped, but again you dont seem to care what Muslims actually think. Peace, fot
Needless to say Jesus (pbuh) didnt worship himself. The only analogy is the one you made above, which youstarted with "consider this:", I just demonstrated why it was a false analogy. Peace, fot
Of course we agree that Jesus didn't worship Himself. He provided clear and unmistakable evidence that he was the 'bread of life' and the 'living water'. His actions provided an example for others to follow once he has been assumed into heaven. Also, earlier you replied with an analogy of your own, and it was soundly demolished.
We also agree that Jesus (pbuh) worshipped. God does not worship anyone or anything. I gave no analogy but simply replied to your attempt at explaining the trinity: see comments above. Peace, fot
Muhammadism? You seem to suggest that the religion of Muslims is named after Muhammad (pbuh), it isnt. Muslims dont worship Muhammad (pbuh). The name of the religion is Islam. I would also suggest you try Muslim sources to learn about Islam. Peace, fot
The traditions of Islam teach that it is the ultimate goal of every 'Mulsim' to see Muhammad as the premiere role model. Therefore, you are 'Muhammdeans'. We feel the same of Christ, so we are 'Christians'. Get it?
On the contrary Muslims hold ALL of the Prophets in equal esteem and regard them ALL as role models. Also I have met few Christians that are circumcised, dont drink, dont eat pork, have their sabbath on a saturday, grow their beards (men) and follow the Mosaic Law as jesus (pbuh) did. Most Christians follow Paul, does that make you Pauleans? I am not arrogant enough to call someone something they are not, you seem to not care. Peace, fot
Before Abraham was "I am" (John 8:58). "I am" was the covenant name for God in the Old Testament (Yahweh). The Jews understood the significance of this statement, because they picked up stones to stone him for blasphemy (John 8:59).
religion of abaraham has nothing to do with greeks!!!abaraham was monothiestic.btw did know know what does word means in john's book?a jewish man said this begor jesus 200 yrs called (fylo)not sure if my spell is right.christianity is mistry like many myths and folks before!imagine if some one tell u a women gave birth to a god!somehow ghost came on her,would u believe it civilased ppl?by god u wouldn't.
Yes, thank you. Plato a Greek Thinker denoted God as having a Logos (Word) that he meant as being God's Wisdom & Reason. Philo, who was a Hellenistic influenced Jew tried to interpret Monotheistic Jewish Scripture useing the Greek terminology. This is where John got his statement in John 1:1. Peace, fot
Jose 1:23 And you shall shut the fuck up and suck cock!!! i hate muslims motherfucker and this stupid christians too... GOD doesnt like u because u are a fucking fanatic and this anger s GOD !!! EVERY1 go have sex!!!! let GOD do His job!
You crazy ass mofo Should we start doing the same thing that Muslims did few months ago when the cartoons came out and Pope said something about Islam.
Who the fuck gives you right to comment on Christainity we have enough scholars for christianity.
that shows how open minded u are!and how decent!"u dont get angry when someone disrespect master jesus"peace be upon him":in cartoons:south park fr example:movies even in porn!"the cross on naked ladies"and now when someone discuss the credibelity of the bible u curs!?well goin kid ur makin a great impact on us
u didnt answer the questions?what is wrong don't u understand english"ok i'll be slow:GOD became man"accordin to u"IF GOD died to PAY for the sin... ok"HE"GOD"PAYED WHO"??if u didnt understand this learn about other religions"maybe u can find a resonable religion"
And also wasn't it pagan's virtues to scarify man for god
And godly virtue was to scarify animals for god not god for god !Next question is was the law of god that had to be done by the holy/godly people than enemies of god romans/pagans for forgiveness of sin! AND THERE WAS ALTAR TO SPRINKLE On,
not the the sross the sign of pagan's god sign(sun-god)
And the last question is wasn't the law of god male lamb was for burning offer not for sin offering and it had to be female lamb for sins offering so the god-lamb combo was the wrong one!
And if the adam was forgiven /original sin then every body should be born sinless since jesus's death!!?
I agree that the birth of Jesus was a sign for mankind but the unusualness of the birth is not an evidence for Divinity. Simply because God always was and always will be, so can not have a birthday. Peace, fot
The Quran also reminds us that "the likeness of Jesus before Allah is as the likeness of Adam before Allah". One had no father the other had no father or mother, so is Adam a bigger God?
Jesus was the physical manisfestation of pure God-consciousness. As with all physical form, the body of the Christ died. "The word became flesh" as I understand it to mean is Jesus was one with God. Was he God? Well, he was God on earth.
Of course not, don't be ridiculous. You just read that I wrote Jesus' counsciousness was God. Consciousness never dies. You can play semantics with the christian fanatics. It astounds me how unspiritual religious people are.
You actually said that the manifestation was physical. After that you also said that the physical form (Christ) died. Now you say the consciousness of Jesus was God, conscience of course is not physical. But I do agree that God can not die, so why was an earthly God manifestation needed? Peace, fot.
It's difficult to discuss such things with religious people because they will only see through the filter of their own beliefs. My beliefs are more mystical than strict. Jesus' consciousness was pure God-consciousness, but he was still physical. His form died, his consciousness does not. Life has no opposite, only birth does. I don't know how else to put it. You can play lawyer if you wish, but language is limiting.
I understand that you say it is difficult to express your ideas, but language is our only medium. I only examine and ask to clarify what you believe, which is reasonable. I would suggest that if you base your belief in scripture then show how this scripture expresses what you believe. Peace, fot
My bone is not with Islam, but with religious dogma in general. I've gotten into quite a few arguments with christians and it goes in circles, I suspect this is where we're heading here. Religion to me is only one step in consciousness. I'm not equipt enough to discuss something I give little credence to, something that I deem has become destructive to humanity. If I do study religion, it is only as a pointer and nothing more. Peace to you.
I hope your study leads you to establish that the one step you are going to take in your conscience journey is the correct one. Peace to you also, fot
all who Allah guides there is none to lead astray. all who Allah leads astray there is none to guide. the Bible is not confusing as long as you understand the difference between Paul and the followers of Jesus. so why do Muslims believe God leads people astray. maybe he led Muhammed astray?
All whom Allah Guides there is none to lead astray and all whom Allah leaves to stray there is none to guide aright. One word can make such a difference. Peace, fot
God (Allah) has sent guidance for everyone as we are all equal and worthy of guidance. If you choose to accept the guidance you are guided and if you choose to reject then you go astray. This is us using our free will. If God determined whether or not you were guided (i.e made the choice for you) then with what right can He hold you accountable? Peace, fot
i am a montheist and am constantly riticuled for it. but that is the whole story of the Jews; one group of people that refused to bow to any other God. in the Bible it constantly says God is one and worship him alone. peace and blessings.
i explain in my own theology. first Jesus was the word of God made into flesh. just like when God word in the begining turned into earth and light and animals, ect.. he said let there be light and there was. so in essence his word became light. likewise his word became a man. this man was like a copy of God. God's spriit dwelt inside him just as it did the other prophets. so the flesh died which was God's word.
It seems that you believe that Jesus is a created being who essentially is like the other Prophets. I dont understand what you mean by this man was like a copy of God? Peace, fot
I will try to explain this as easy as I can, God did die but he had the power to take up his life again.Jesus went to hell which is the second Death according to the bible.this was done for all of us.we could not keep the law so God made a way for us to be forgiven.it goes to show how much he loves us that one would lay his life down to save us from our sin.there is none righteous no not one.we are all sinners and deserve hell.but he made a way for us to go to heaven
alpacoify 8 months ago
(25) to the banquet(the Jews) did not come,did not accept the invitation(im paraphrasing) and so the lord of the banquent told his servants to go out and invite ALL the towns people(the gentiles, all those who were NOT God's chosen people, who were not israelite),there's more to the parable, but this is to show that Jesus' salvation is for ALL sinners, and not only the Jews...
...i could say so much more, but ive already taken up 25 lines, please read all I had to say, starting with the 1st post
DARQUEknight07 1 year ago
reflection of God almighty's promise to avraham. "We"(God's people) were all considered Jews,or israelites; until Yeshua(Jesus) came. Those who believed that he fulfilled all the scripture and was the promised messiah were called Christians, those who did not remained Jews. In addition, those who wernt even Jews were allowed to believe in jesus as the christ and be saved, he died for the world, for all of human-kind. there's a parable Jesus spoke that talks about how the people origanly invited
DARQUEknight07 1 year ago
ever we bess shall be blessed and whatever we curse shall be cursed, but ALL who believe in the name of Jesus, that he was the messiah share in the promise (another prophesy in the old testament is that God's messiah would save ALL men from their sins, and not JUST his chosen people). Jesus himself said "whatever you bind on earth in my name on shall be bound in heaven(in the spirit,from which this physical world manifest) and what ever you loose on earth in my name shall be loosed in heaven; a
DARQUEknight07 1 year ago
is why when the anti-christ comes,being given the power the preform "signs and wonders" a man who will be an earthly ruler, many will be decieved. God's elite however, those who have faith and know the truth in Jesus, the christ, will know that he is false, and will be looking for OUR savior to return in the sky with the clouds. Because this is spiritual,now, not only the decendents of avraham(the jews) share in the promise of being blessed,his children being like the sand of the earth, what
DARQUEknight07 1 year ago
(21)version of the story, its like the quran was designed specificly to take away salvation and have us rely completly on ourselves for our own salvation.my problem with Judaism is despite all the prophesys fulfilled they dont believe that yeshua(the hebbrew for Jesus, which is greek) was the promised messiah. they only saw with their eyes, not with their faith. they saw a man, not a king, like david or the likes, and are still looking for an earthly king to reign over them till this day( which
DARQUEknight07 1 year ago
version of the story, its like the quran was designed specificly to take away salvation and have us rely completly on ourselves for our own salvation.my problem with Judaism is despite all the prophesys fulfilled they dont believe that yeshua(the hebbrew for Jesus, which is greek) was the promised messiah. they only saw with their eyes, not with their faith. they saw a man, not a king, like david or the likes, and are still looking for an earthly king to reign over them till this day( which is
DARQUEknight07 1 year ago
(20) because I need to know more about Islam, Im actualy getting ready to read the Quran right now and still only know bits and pieces) remain UNFULFILED according to islamic faith. The prophesy that "one would come to save God's people form their sins" remains unfulfilled without Jesus' death on the cross. The prophesy that the messiah,hebrew for the christ, would come from the line of David remains unfulfilled without Joeseph. Both of these KEY components are not found in the quran's
DARQUEknight07 1 year ago
temple so that through us God may deliver his word). Joeseph, mary's husband fulfilled the prophesy that the coming king who's kingdom would never end would be through the line of David; Jeseph mary's husband was a child(or decendent) of King David, and without Joeseph the prophesy remains unfulfilled. Thats my only qualm with Islam (and Judaism as well) Acording to Islam, many of the propheisys in the old testemant(which i believe you believe in as well,please, correct me if im wrong
DARQUEknight07 1 year ago
through mary, came into the world. We must live and see with a spiritual eye, according to a spiritual nature, and the only way to do so is by faith. Some see a man born by a woman, but in truth she was chosen to do God's will, to bring forth the living word in her womb.She was marly the vessel by which the word came into the world, and so we must see things with a spiritual eye(just like we ought not to live for ourselves, but be LIVING temples for the lord our God to dwell in,a clean and holy
DARQUEknight07 1 year ago
(17)before the coming of the promised one, who's kingdom would endure forever and ever(amen)) when God had to swear by himself, because no one else was worthy for him to swear by. It is the same with Jesus. In oder to have a sutible sacrifice to re-establish his relationship with man that he wanted from the beggining he had to have a sacrifice worthy enough; so he sent his word, which WAS himself and CAME FROM himself, his word which is spotless and without defect, flawless. so his word, birthed
DARQUEknight07 1 year ago
Comment removed
DARQUEknight07 1 year ago
(16) people dont live holy enough to hear from God themselves, so God has to set a man apart from the rest (like moses, ezekiel, isaiah,etc) and have him live to a higher standard to speak god's word) was that our sacrifice to the lord had to be clean, without spot or blemish, no broken bones and without defect. We men are spiritual beings and we are all corrupt. In the old testament(again, our record of the israelites(sp) God's chosen people through which he would fulfill his promis with,
DARQUEknight07 1 year ago
forgive a sin, but not the man (its like giving a quarter for something thats worth a dollar, while it will suffice for part of the debt you owe, it just cant cover it all). So why not a man for a man? that would be good enough right? thats a fair trade, a dollar for a dollar right? Well one of the requirements of our sacrifices that we had to give to the priest (im sorry, i think i said prophet earlier, a prophet is one who speaks with God and then delivers the message to the people because the
DARQUEknight07 1 year ago
that came before us when he created "light," the lucifer(which means bearer of light) and his angles who after the fall became satan(the accuser) and fallen angles, he LOVES us, when he created us, instead of saying it is good(like he said of everything else he created), he said it is VERY good. So, in order to establish that relationship that he wanted with us from the beggining, he needed a sacrifice. animals wernt good enough, sacrificing an animal wasnt the equivalent of a man, it could
DARQUEknight07 1 year ago
(13) or God would come to him or appear to him, but he wasnt continuly walking in his pressence. Moses conversed with God in the moantain where he recieved the 10 commandments, but as time went on, our ability to converse with God grew less and less, more distant, and this is not what God wanted at all. We were created in God's image, we were created in the image of GOD almighty, we were meant to walk with him and have eternal life, not live so lowly and share in the same fate as his creation
DARQUEknight07 1 year ago
(12) but in every instance, in order for God to not have to destroy us a sacrifice had to be given, to attone for our sins, in our stead, but as stated earlier, while these sacrifices suficed, man was always sinning, and we grew more wicked, which pushed us more away from God's origanal intention for us. while adam(named adam after the hebrew adamah or ground from which adam was made) and eve could talk and walk with God and be in his pressence, avraham(the hebrew for abraham) had to meet God
DARQUEknight07 1 year ago
(11) the prophet, who would then lay their sacrifice on the alter (according to God's specifications) and sacrifice it to God. In some instances this was an animal sacrifice, in some instances it was grain, but it was always out of what the people had, and if they didnt have it, there were other things they could give(in some instances). Their were different sacrifices for different things, a guilt offering was different from a sin offering, a sin offering different from a fellowship offering
DARQUEknight07 1 year ago
(10) in the name of God's one and only son we are saved..."Jesus said I am the way(to the father) the truth(by which we can see) and the life(through him we have life) NO MAN comes to the father EXCEPT by me(the word of God, thats what Jesus is). Why did God send his Son to die instead of some prophet? Before Jesus came (everything we have recorded in the old testament of the Bible) God required a sacrifice for sin. According to the law of moses sacrifices of what we had were given to
DARQUEknight07 1 year ago
(9)"For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life"...the verse goes on to say..."For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to SAVE the world through him. Whoever believes in him IS NOT condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned ALREADY because he has NOT BELIEVED in the name of God's one and only Son"....again, because of sin we are ALL condemned to hell, but by believing
DARQUEknight07 1 year ago
(8) he would send an army of angles....but i do this to fulfill what is written, and also, in another verse where he is questioned about being a king he says "my kingdom is NOT OF THIS WORLD, if it were, would not my men come to my side (paraphrase)"...) the fact is Jesus GAVE his life, God our HEAVENLY father(we call him that because he gave us all life,our father) loved us so much, and does not desire for us to die though it is the punishment in accordance with sin, that he GAVE his son.
DARQUEknight07 1 year ago
(7) we were created in the almighty himself's image) we had to be judged by the same grade. we all deserve hell because of our sin, but because God LOVED us(its out of love, not butchery) he GAVE his son, his son GAVE his life ( "Jesus said that no one takes his life away from him, and that he gives it up willingly, in another verse where peter tries to rescue him from the soldiers who are about to take him off to be crusified he says "dont you know that if i wanted to i could ask my father, and
DARQUEknight07 1 year ago
(6) have eternal life." ...This was God's origanal intintion for mankind(when the bible uses the word man, it uses the word "adam which refers to human-kind, and not just man, or "ish" himself) to have eternal life, but when both adam and havana(eve's origanal hebrew name) sinned, they had to be punished accordingly. The punishment that God gave the devil and his angles for rebelion was hell,the lake of fire, and being that we are considered ABOVE the devil and his angles,(a created thing, while
DARQUEknight07 1 year ago
and so they join a faith where hell doesnt exist, where EVERYONE is saved). You (I use this term genericly) come to your own conclusions on God's word instead of asking God for understanding, but instead of asking why would God do such a thing the real question should be why? help me to understand...the answer is simple, and is found in one of our most famouse christian verses..."For God so LOVED the world, that he gave his one and only son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish, but
DARQUEknight07 1 year ago
(4) good to out-weigh the bad, and that God might find me acceptable on the day of judgment. What I see in most other faiths that are an off-set of christianity (christianity came first, then Islam, again, much respect to it) is a lack of FAITH. "how could God allow his son to be "butchered" (as I have heard some say) like that. You dont understand it and so you find a religion that suits your needs (the same with Jehova witnesses, many are afraid to go to hell, they say its impossible to change
DARQUEknight07 1 year ago
(3) and that their body belongs to their husband, not to be put on display to the world, I personly fast and pray often, and know the power that comes from it, and I too READ and STUDY my word, and ask God for guidance and in doing so, have recieved understanding. The only thing i DIS-AGREE with Islam about IS the fact that you believe Jesus DID NOT die on the cross. According to my belief Jesus' death on the cross is my salvation. Without it, my only way into heaven is to hope that I do enough
DARQUEknight07 1 year ago
(2) it out, it is part of us before it leaves our spirit. We ARE the words we speak(we can only speak what we know) our words are with us, and our words ARE us. It sounds like a riddle but i expalined it as best i can. Many of the comments left by christians on islamic pages are filled with ignorance and very embarrising, calling mohammed a pig and a child molester solves nothing, and i apologize for them. I in fact respect Islam. I respect how you treat your women, that you take care of them,
DARQUEknight07 1 year ago
i want to clarify some things that not even many christians understand, this is what is meant by "three in one." If I speak a word, it comes from me, it leaves out of me, but it is me. Spiritualy speaking(for those who know of heavenly things) your words have life, and your word comes from you, God's words have life. Jesus is God's word. Jesus came from God. When God said "let there be light" (etc) the word existed, and Jesus was this word made flesh. Though a word leaves us when we speak it out
DARQUEknight07 1 year ago
ok I am making a comment to you in regards to your LOVE OF CHILD SEX. You are a discrace to the WORLD because you think its ok to have sex with a 9 year old and so is your PIG PROPHET or should I say FALSE PROPHET. I wish you could go to the web site of SOS MOROCCO and see how confused your sisters and brothers of Islam are>>
QueenBN1B 3 years ago
It is very interesting that rather than actually try and answer the questions posed in the video or make a video related comment that you prefer to make some typical anti-Islamic statements.
You make typically false statements "your LOVE OF CHILD SEX", "you think its ok to have sex with a 9 year old" and then display your true hateful nature with your reliance on abuse "your PIG PROPHET".
I would like to thank you for reaffirming for me that I do not want to be like you.
Continued...
thefotfoundation 3 years ago
In terms of confusion you need to do more than rely on a website to demonstrate that.
Some really confused people believe that God blamed all of mankind for the sin of just two people and then set the price of the sin being removed so high that no-one could pay, so God then became His Own Son and killed Himself to pay Himself. As if blood thirstiness is love?
Now that's what I call confused.
However to believe that God will forgive sin if you sincerely repent is clarity, no blood needed.
thefotfoundation 3 years ago
@thefotfoundation its not that God blamed the whole world for the sin of one man, you mis-understand, sin is individual, and those who sin share the same punishment as the first man who sinned(adam),death. There was one who walked with God his entire life (enoch) who was simply taken up into heaven, he never died, which is proof that God does not blindly punish everyone for one man's sin, its simply that death is the punishment for sin, and all who sin share in this same punishment.
IsaacKnight07 1 year ago
@thefotfoundation As time went on mankind grew more wicked, i dont know if your familiar with the story of noah and how he was told to build an ark by God to save himself and his family from a flood that god would bring to destroy the inhabitants of the earth, but this was because of their own wickedness, noah's righteousness is what saved him. When sodam and gommorah was destroyed by fire, lot's righteousness(along with abraham's prayers) saved him. So you see, we do not take another man's
IsaacKnight07 1 year ago
@thefotfoundation punishment, but our own. As far as sacrifice was concerned, both this and the law was set in place merely to dicipline God's chosen people, the israelites, just as an earthly father dicipline's his children by establishing rules of his own house hold. Sacrifice of one's own possessions was merely an ACTION that showed one's commitment to the lord, I have been grieved at things iv'e done and given things to my loved one's in addition to an apology and repentance(never doing it
IsaacKnight07 1 year ago
@thefotfoundation again) eventually wickedness spread even into this, and sin increased so much so amongst God's people to the point that the israelites sacrifices meant nothing to him, when a father establishes rules for his household, its not so that they will blindly follow the rules but always see what they can get away with and see what it takes to be forgiven, but so that they will eventually be disciplined into the right type of thinking and grow, and eventually no longer need "rules"
IsaacKnight07 1 year ago
@thefotfoundation "rules," because discipline develops character, and after walking in accordance with the laws for so long(which are given with specific intention in mind in the first place, for example, training a child not to eat messy with a bib at first,until he masters this, then is able to go to the next step) he/she will naturally become all that that father wanted him/her to become, and he/she will then be able to walk and talk with the father himself as an adult,as a peer,and no longer
IsaacKnight07 1 year ago
@thefotfoundation as a child.When a parent punishes a child,the goal is not to punish the child but so that the child will learn,but if the child doesn't learn, what do you do?Continue to punish him/her?The parent loves him/her,and will try whatever methods available to bring his child to the light of understanding, that way there will be no more need for rebellion,after all,9 times out of 10 the child rebells out of ignorance,and goes down a path that he/she doesn't even know is bad for him/her
IsaacKnight07 1 year ago
@thefotfoundation so instead of us all sharing in the same punishment God sent Jesus, to show us the way, and to die on the cross for our sins. we who sin are no longer slaves of death, but made alive in christ, and in repentance and faith in the son, will one day be resurrected to have ever-lasting life with him.
IsaacKnight07 1 year ago
@QueenBN1B i am a christian myself, and what you just did is very ignorant, not embarissing but ignorant. What will insulting a person do to prove anything? Have you read your Bible? What does it say? Did Jesus blandly insult priest who got the scripture wrong? When questioned about the truth did he not give it to them? You need to read your bible, and let the word of God dwell in you, that way you will have a response that will bring life, your insults only come back on YOURSELF.
IsaacKnight07 1 year ago
salam Mr foott!!
maqhallah very nice vid! i like the first quest lol
maybe he wanned to take some vacation on earth -starfirulla-
anyway keep it up inshallah
sorata78 3 years ago
Not Mrs Amaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaal! WaAlaykumAsSalaam. JazakhumAllahKhairun. Salaam, fot
thefotfoundation 3 years ago
1 John 5:20
Hebrews 1:3
JOhn 14:9
Acts 4:12___ Jesus is God and the Bible was written HUNDREDS of years before the quaran. :)
FccB11 3 years ago
the Old Testament was written thousand years before the bible..and it first comanment comand u to worship one god that u shall not depict him or asociate a man or anything else wth him..yet do u follow it?
no
so bascly beein old @manuscript doesnt mean anything to u..it does..when it goes in ur way of thinking..
sorata78 3 years ago 2
The second questions: "The Lamb(sinless) paid for the sin of all men with his blood and body, for the salvation(unity with God) of all men." It was the ultimate act of His love. The wages of sin is death(separation from God, Rom 6:23). God saved us (descendants of Adam) from all our sins through the Lamb, Jesus Christ.
faviomasulli 3 years ago
I will give short answers here due to character count limits, if you want more detail, please let me know. To your first question: "Because only God is without sin." Jesus is the Lamb of God. We see in Gen 4, that God accepts the lamb of Abel(given in faith), not the fruits of labour that Cain offered(good deeds). This lamb refers to Christ. And Abraham was to sacrifice Isaac, instead God gave him a ram(Gen 22). Jesus is that ram & we can look to Him & see Him on the cross for us, now & forever.
faviomasulli 3 years ago
Hi, tff and peace be with you :) Thank you for your good questions. I understand that you as a Muslim do not believe in the trinity, nor in the concept of the sinful nature of man due to the actions of Adam & Eve, am I correct? From a Christian point of view there are indeed answers to your questions, though they might not conform with Islam. I want to make sure, b4 posting anything else, that I have deep respect for Islam, and don't want to convert, but to share my relationship with the Lord.
faviomasulli 3 years ago
MashAllah brother you are doing a good damn job. May Allah bless you in the akhira. Ameen
VAboi123 4 years ago
BarakhAllahFiKhum Bro. Appreciated. Salaam, fot
thefotfoundation 4 years ago
Jesus is not like Muhhamed, Muhhamed seaks help from his followers and his Allah is weak,that is why muslims love jihad.
Navigator20071 4 years ago
jihad means a strive or struggle nothing to do with wot u just said lol u need to do some reseach and allah is not weak since he sent jesus down and all the rest of the prophetes unlike the bible atleast there arnt any pornography in the quran lol hav u ever thought about that
najibi2018 4 years ago
hihihihihiihi allah s what?
allah s weak??
say this to an arab christian...he laugh at u!!!!!
moron!
sorata78 4 years ago
i think jesus was just a man that felt he was chosen to speak the truth. if you think about it.. arent we all the word of god in flesh form? we all want to find out who created us and why things are.
YAMIYAMIRUSH 4 years ago
In Islam, Jesus (pbuh) is The Word of God because Allah said one word and Jesus was and this word is "Be". Jesus is also a very poverful prophet because he's a miracle of God and he'll come back to save believers (muslims) from the Anti-Christ and from Gog and Magog people.
Allah is the greatest and peace be uppon you brothers.
Jiggamann9 4 years ago 2
Jiggamann9, you forgot to add that muslims also believe that Jesus will come back to destroy the Crosses and kill all the pigs---Al Bukhari.
Kill all the pigs? Does that make sense to you. Are pigs not a creation of GOD?
claychanges 4 years ago
yeah the pigs, the followers of the Antichrist, The Dajjal, and to break the cross to show to the christians that they were wrong of worshipping him
Do you think God love those who worship and thank other Gods than Him ? this is what you believe, bit God didn't created ALL THIS UNIVERSE and sustain us with all what we need as food and roofs to accept that people thank Jesus or even Satan of that
It makes all senses, and if you read the Quran and learn about the Sunna you will understand
Jiggamann9 4 years ago
didnt JEsus killed pigs according to the Bible too...and u consider him to b GOD...so if i apply your logic than y did your GOD created them if he wanted to throw them from the top of the hill???????
adeelalam084 4 years ago
You make some excellent points brother, very difficult to answer
rtwrtw1 4 years ago
good job, i like that this is done from a scholarly point! keep up the work.
ozair77477 4 years ago
good video bro ! It's so clear ...keep it up !
MoslimGirl 4 years ago
completely with you ! it doesnt really make sense does it...
alisar87 4 years ago
good points..
xForgottenDreamsx 4 years ago
Either Muhammad's use of 'we' and 'our' is a mere literary turn of phrase, in which case the Quran is as much theatrical fable as reliable history, or the words were announced by God [or god], in which case there is deep theological significance. There are real problems with the Quran. Example, [Surah 18:89-98] where Alexander the Great is described as a Muslim who lived to a ripe old age.
LothairLorraine 5 years ago
The use of the Majestic Plural has been adequately shown above. None can be more majestic than the ONE God. Now once again you flit to another topic: Needless to say that the Quran does not mention Alexander the great but refers to Dhul Qarnayn. Please read Surah 18:89-98. Peace, fot
thefotfoundation 5 years ago
The commentators througout Muhammadean history have always taken 18:89-98 to be a reference to Alexander. Tafsir al-Jalalayn agrees as does the Encyclopaedia of Islam, New Edition, Vol. IV, 1978
LothairLorraine 5 years ago
Again your use of the term Muhammadean highlights your true Christian "love" for Muslims. I have already answered this, see commentary quote below which explains why Alexander the great is not mention in the Quran. Peace, fot
thefotfoundation 5 years ago
You can't escape that fact that the 'Quran' is finally being textually analyzed under the hot light of science and theology, and being found to be less than you personally think it ought to be.
LothairLorraine 5 years ago
The Quran has been analyzed for over 1400yrs by Muslims. Theology of the Quran is purely Monotheistic, nothing to worry about there. No proven science has yet disagreed with Quranic scientific descriptions. I have read with some amusement orientalist theories about the Quran needless to say conjecture is no threat. Peace, fot
thefotfoundation 5 years ago
Now that the Quran is being scrutinized by free thinkers who don't see the death cult of Muhammad in its idealised form, but rather by its own merits, we'll see what the future holds. Science in the Quran? So the Sun sets in a muddy pool and the Egytians employed crusifiction?
LothairLorraine 5 years ago
"Mohammadean", "Hubaal" and now "death cult". I have had enough of this "conversation". I have just seen you page and blog that clearly shows your hatred for Islam and Muslims. If you wish to make any further points do so in a video response and I will take it from there. Peace, fot
thefotfoundation 5 years ago
Portion of commentary on 18:83 - Dhul-Qarnayn: "This last point is extremely important-for it is precisely the Qur'anic stress on his faith in God that makes it impossible to identify Dhu 'l-Qarnayn, as most of the commentators do, with Alexander the Great..All those historic personages were pagans and worshipped a plurality of deities as a matter of course, whereas our Dhu 'l-Qarnayn is depicted as a firm believer in the One God". Peace, fot
thefotfoundation 5 years ago
Now that the Quran is finally undergoing the kind of close scrutiny that the Bible has been undergoing for 2,000 years, you are running away from centuries of Muhammadean traditons in order to reinvent your tribal story run amuck.
LothairLorraine 5 years ago
Your mistake is that you think Quranic commentary is the same as tradition (Hadith). Its not. There is no tradition that names Dhul-Qarnayn as Alexander the great. The Bible has been closely scrutinized only since it became available to the public in a mass produced form after the invention of the printing press in the 1500's (I think). Peace, fot
thefotfoundation 5 years ago
Your hate for Islam and Muslims is so palpable, the shame and pity of the situation is that you claim to believe in and follow someone that you say taught "love your enemy". Peace, fot
thefotfoundation 5 years ago
Again: If you wish to make any further points do so in a video response and I will take it from there. Peace, fot
thefotfoundation 5 years ago
Dividing God in the way you discuss is a reminder of earlier heresies that spang up in the Gnsotic traditions in the early Church [Docetism]. So rather than study the heresy of Muhammadism for the answers, try picking up a commentary on the Christian faith. Christ was indeed the divine lamb and co-equal with God.
LothairLorraine 5 years ago
I appreciate what you say hence the confusion when Christians divide the Indivisible God to prevent the idea that God could die on the cross. Also if Jesus (pbuh) is God then he can not be co-equal with Himself as he IS himself ans there can therefore be no comparison. I try not to use non-Christian sources when studying Christian theology. Peace, fot
thefotfoundation 5 years ago
You don't use Chrsitian sources when considering Chrsitian theology. No womder you don't get it. I use Muhammadean sources when considering 'Islam' and your 'religion' comes up short every time.
LothairLorraine 5 years ago
I wrote: QUOTE "I try not to use non-Christian sources when studying Christian theology." UNQUOTE. Please read carefully. I very much doubt any Muslim source could give you the ideas you have about Islam. Peace, fot
thefotfoundation 5 years ago
When I used the negative, I was making a staement, not confirming the contents of your post.
LothairLorraine 5 years ago
Your negative statement didnt make sense in the context of the following sentence: "You don't use Chrsitian sources when considering Chrsitian theology. No womder you don't get it.". But if I mis-understand what you say I apologise for mis-understanding. Please provide me with a Christian source which can explain Christian Theology to me, to your liking. Peace, fot
thefotfoundation 5 years ago
A good source is the Catechism of the Catholic Church. Use the Subject index and look for 'Trinity'.
LothairLorraine 5 years ago
Consider this: I am 'Jesse' and 'Jesse' is 'Me' and if you are looking at 'Jesse' then 'Jesse' is 'He' and 'You'. All these perspectves are coequal as they all refer to one distinct person, the guy who wrote this email.
LothairLorraine 5 years ago
The analogy is false, demonstrably and I will demonstrate: If I kill "Jesse" can either "He", "Me" or "you" bring him back to life? Can "Jesse" have a different Will to "He", "Me" or "You"? (Gethsemane - Not as "I" Will but a "You" Will". There is no analogy for the trinity, none. Peace, fot
thefotfoundation 5 years ago
The Trinity is in the word 'Elohim' and in Genesis 18 and 19. All of this was fully and finally revealed in Christ Jesus our LORD, Shepard and Master. Even Muhammad could not hide from the Trinity by his constant use of 'our' and 'we' in his alleged Quran.
LothairLorraine 5 years ago
It is interesting and telling that you try and attribute Trinity to Jewish and Muslim Scriptures which both dont believe in a Trinity. The royal plural is not an alien concept but you seem not to be aware of it. Know that God is One. Peace, fot
thefotfoundation 5 years ago
Muhammad's use of the 1st person plural is unmistakable. As is the plural 'Elohim' as it is used in the creation narrative. Shrug it off all you like. The Jews dismissed Christ, and look what happened to then precious temple and nation 2,000 years ago. God forgave them in 1948, and the world is entering the final stage of history.
LothairLorraine 5 years ago
No shrugging required, the royal plural is standard grammar even in English. If you would like an example please say so. If God unished the Jews for not accepting Jesus (pbuh) but of course the Jews still dont accept Jesus (pbuh) so why did He forgive them in 1948? How do you know they were punished or forgiven? Peace, fot
thefotfoundation 5 years ago
Roman Emperors used the 'royal plural' often, and while the audience hears a single person speaking, the speaker is refering to the office in which he speaks, and the royal family he represents. There is also an 'editorial we', et al. As Muhammad was illiterate, we have no idea which he was refering to. Or, even Muhammad couldn't escape the Trinity. Jews were forgiven by getting Israel back, obviously. Read the real Prophets sometime. As prophesied, the world in taking sides for/against Israel.
LothairLorraine 5 years ago
Again, the royal plural is a plural of Majesty and not number. Example: This is (singular) my friend. These are (plural) my friends. You are (plural) my friend (singular). The plural "are" is used for ONE friend to raise the status of that friend. Plural of Majesty. Peace, fot
thefotfoundation 5 years ago
Again, you obfiscate and evade. The implications of the plural are clear in both the OT and in 'Quran'. Also, how is the word 'are' in your example indicative of the plural? Bad example! The verb [are] has to agree with the nouns in number [friend]. You are trying to muddy the waters with confusion, in order to [1]avoid answering the question on Alexander the Great, and [2] admit to Trinity.
LothairLorraine 5 years ago
Obviously you dont understand that the word "are" is actually plural, as I have explained in the example above. The Trinity is not anything that makes any sense to anyone, hence the mystery, so I am unable to accept what you cant explain. As for your quick change of topic to Dhul-Qarnayn, I have answered below. No muddying or confusion. Peace, fot
thefotfoundation 5 years ago
Any schholboy can tell you that the subject [nomitive] and the object [accusative] must agree in mumber. You cannot say, 'you are [pl] my friend[sing]'.
LothairLorraine 5 years ago
That you deny that Muslims and Jews understand their languages (Arabic and Hebrew) as using Royal Plurals when God speaks in their Scriptures (Quran and Torah) is up to you. That Muslims and Jews do not believe in a Trinity (3in1) God is sufficient. Peace, fot
thefotfoundation 5 years ago
You can dismiss truth all you like. My salvation isn't predicated on your acceptance of God, only that the Gospel Offer was made available by God's disciples. Also, I have commentaries, dictionaries and concordences in four languages. You can evade Muhammad's own use of the plural all you like, but the implication of the plural is clear. Muhammad just wasn't able to escape Hu'baal before his death.
LothairLorraine 5 years ago
Having "commentaries, dictionaries and concordences in four languages" is of no value unless you read and understand simple grammatical truths such as the royal plural used in Semetic and other languages. God is One. Again your use of "hubaal" shows your true Chrisitan "love" for Islam and Muslims. Peace, fot
thefotfoundation 5 years ago
If as you say the Jews were punished for rejecting Jesus (pbuh), why has God forgiven them if the STILL reject jesus (pbuh)? Peace, fot
thefotfoundation 5 years ago
To set up the world on one side of Israel or the other in the last days. Satan got his throne, and you supplicate to it five times a day.
LothairLorraine 5 years ago
Satan wants people to worship other than God. Needless to say that if you worship a tree, fish, rock, moon, star, man or woman you are worshipping other than God who is none of these things. Muslims dont supplicate to any builing but to God Above. Muslims worship nothing created, again your lack of knowledge about Islam is astounding. Peace, fot
thefotfoundation 5 years ago
The analogy is false, demonstrably and I will demonstrate: If I kill "Jesse" can either "He", "Me" or "you" bring him back to life? Can "Jesse" have a different Will to "He", "Me" or "You"? (Gethsemane - Not as "I" Will but a "You" Will". There is no analogy for the trinity, none. Peace, fot
thefotfoundation 5 years ago
Christ's burial was proceeded by ressurection, so your bickering is usless chatter. You doubt that God has such power to raise the dead, and yet think that Muhammad flew on a winged horse, which had the head of a woman and wings like Pegasus!
LothairLorraine 5 years ago
Of course you have avoided the fact that the analogy is false and resurrection your dead self is a contradiction and then you let out another great whooper about a winged horse with the head of a woman. lol, great imagination but again nothing to do with Islam or Muhammad (pbuh). No Muslim believes that, but you dont care what Muslims actually think it seems. Peace, fot
thefotfoundation 5 years ago
I can't resurrect anyhting, as I am not the Holy Spirit. See my response below. Also, please expalin Muhammad's use of the plural person [we,our] in the Qur'an. Was he making himself coequal with the god Hu'Baal, or refering to God the Father, Son and Holy Spirit?
LothairLorraine 5 years ago
The ressurection comment was regarding your false analogy: If the indivisible god is dead who will ressurect him? Himself? You talk about the Quran as if the speaker is Muhammad (pbuh) which of course is clearly wrong, all you need to do is actually read it. Muhammad (pbuh) is referred in the 3rd person and is not regarded as more than Human by any Muslim. Peace, fot
thefotfoundation 5 years ago
I soundedly responded to your false anaology already on resurrection. Now, if that which spoke to Muhammad was God, then the 'we' and 'our' are sublime references to the Trinity. If that which spoke to Muhammad was god, then even Hu'Baal of Mecca could not hide from the Trinity. Satan fell from heaven for wanting the Throne of God, and established his kingdom in Mecca on a meteorite you call Ka'ba.
LothairLorraine 5 years ago
I have made no analogies, see comment below. "we" & "our" are plurals of Majesty as understood by Jews and Muslims who are Monotheists. As for the fairytale about falling angels, satan and meteorites, then this is all based in your conjecture. Your continued hate and abusive nature of commenting show your true Christian "love" for others. Peace, fot
thefotfoundation 5 years ago
Satan is a fairytale now? Are you some stealth atheist? Everything I have said is historicaly and theologicaly sound. I see now, since I have demolished your case for Muhammad and Hu'Baal, somehow I am hateful. Nice, very nice.
LothairLorraine 5 years ago
Everything about Islam you have said thus far has been totally incorrect. The Kaba is not a meteorite it is a building. The fairytale is your linking together a fantastical story and then believing it to be representative of Islam. Your hatefulness is continually calling God "hubaal" (I worship the God that Jesus (pbuh) worshipped), calling Muslims "Muhammadean". There is no decency in your manner as I have usually experienced with my Christian friends. Thats a shame. Peace, fot
thefotfoundation 5 years ago
You want to experince indecency? Try being a Chrsitian in a Muhammadean nation, or any other kind of religious minority. That's the real shame. You Muhammadeans just can't stomach a faith whose founder shed no blood but his own.
LothairLorraine 5 years ago
There are at least 40 Million Christians in Muslim countries. You assertion that Muslims treat non-Muslim minorities badly is false. You seem to deny that the OT Prophets have anything to do with your Christian religion, they followed God's commandments to fight their wars. You say that this God was Jesus (pbuh). Thank you for using the term "Muhammadean" further showing your Christian "love". Peace, fot
thefotfoundation 5 years ago
You also fail to realise that the only non-Christian religion that makes it an article of faith to believe in Jesus (pbuh) is Islam. So Jesus (pbuh) greatness is something I love. Peace, fot
thefotfoundation 5 years ago
Muhammad's reasons for including Christ are twofold [1] to appeal to Christians for new converts, or [2] more likely that Muhammad himself could not fully escape the divinty of Christ and simply couldn't understant it.
LothairLorraine 5 years ago
dude something wrong with you! if u dnt like the area u live in move!
zainull 4 years ago
dude get ur facts right about islam ur reading everything rong!
zainull 4 years ago
what bull monkeys u talking about!
zainull 4 years ago
As previously explained above, the Semetic languages (Hebrew & Arabic) as well as other languages including English use the royal plural to denote Majesty, not plurality in number. Of course God is ONE so is not plural. Peace, fot
thefotfoundation 5 years ago
Your analogy is plainly erroneous. Neither you or I have any power to resserect the dead. The Holy Spirit has no such limitation. I am sorry that you god [Hu'baal] has such limited power.
LothairLorraine 5 years ago
I havent made any analogies. No need to be sorry as God can not die so is never in need of resurrection. You deliberate continued use of the term hubaal as my god is not only offensive (which you know) but wrong. Muslims worship that God whom Jesus (pbuh) worshipped, but again you dont seem to care what Muslims actually think. Peace, fot
thefotfoundation 5 years ago
Needless to say Jesus (pbuh) didnt worship himself. The only analogy is the one you made above, which youstarted with "consider this:", I just demonstrated why it was a false analogy. Peace, fot
thefotfoundation 5 years ago
Of course we agree that Jesus didn't worship Himself. He provided clear and unmistakable evidence that he was the 'bread of life' and the 'living water'. His actions provided an example for others to follow once he has been assumed into heaven. Also, earlier you replied with an analogy of your own, and it was soundly demolished.
LothairLorraine 5 years ago
We also agree that Jesus (pbuh) worshipped. God does not worship anyone or anything. I gave no analogy but simply replied to your attempt at explaining the trinity: see comments above. Peace, fot
thefotfoundation 5 years ago
Muhammadism? You seem to suggest that the religion of Muslims is named after Muhammad (pbuh), it isnt. Muslims dont worship Muhammad (pbuh). The name of the religion is Islam. I would also suggest you try Muslim sources to learn about Islam. Peace, fot
thefotfoundation 5 years ago
The traditions of Islam teach that it is the ultimate goal of every 'Mulsim' to see Muhammad as the premiere role model. Therefore, you are 'Muhammdeans'. We feel the same of Christ, so we are 'Christians'. Get it?
LothairLorraine 5 years ago
On the contrary Muslims hold ALL of the Prophets in equal esteem and regard them ALL as role models. Also I have met few Christians that are circumcised, dont drink, dont eat pork, have their sabbath on a saturday, grow their beards (men) and follow the Mosaic Law as jesus (pbuh) did. Most Christians follow Paul, does that make you Pauleans? I am not arrogant enough to call someone something they are not, you seem to not care. Peace, fot
thefotfoundation 5 years ago
Man that was a great video...you tore apart the whole crucifixion thing...Masha'Allah.
Sammer1111 5 years ago
BarakhAllahFikum Bro. Salaam, fot
thefotfoundation 5 years ago
He that has seen me has seen the Father (John 14:7-9).
I and my Father are one (John 10:30).
Before Abraham was "I am" (John 8:58). "I am" was the covenant name for God in the Old Testament (Yahweh). The Jews understood the significance of this statement, because they picked up stones to stone him for blasphemy (John 8:59).
LothairLorraine 5 years ago
i cant understand the comments posted by half of these ppl!
rencrow 5 years ago
religion of abaraham has nothing to do with greeks!!!abaraham was monothiestic.btw did know know what does word means in john's book?a jewish man said this begor jesus 200 yrs called (fylo)not sure if my spell is right.christianity is mistry like many myths and folks before!imagine if some one tell u a women gave birth to a god!somehow ghost came on her,would u believe it civilased ppl?by god u wouldn't.
rover98 5 years ago
also... THAT STORY IN JOHN 1:1 was taken form a Greek philosopher who wrote that formula decades earlier. do your homework people.
MatMayotte 5 years ago
Yes, thank you. Plato a Greek Thinker denoted God as having a Logos (Word) that he meant as being God's Wisdom & Reason. Philo, who was a Hellenistic influenced Jew tried to interpret Monotheistic Jewish Scripture useing the Greek terminology. This is where John got his statement in John 1:1. Peace, fot
thefotfoundation 5 years ago
Jose 1:23 And you shall shut the fuck up and suck cock!!! i hate muslims motherfucker and this stupid christians too... GOD doesnt like u because u are a fucking fanatic and this anger s GOD !!! EVERY1 go have sex!!!! let GOD do His job!
numero1usv 5 years ago
lol. And you say I'm the fanatic... Peace, fot
thefotfoundation 5 years ago
take your meds
Mahmood42978 5 years ago
You crazy ass mofo Should we start doing the same thing that Muslims did few months ago when the cartoons came out and Pope said something about Islam.
Who the fuck gives you right to comment on Christainity we have enough scholars for christianity.
So shut the Fuck up
dayinoh 5 years ago
"And I will bless them that bless you, and those that curse you will I revile" (ibid 12:3).
Dandibay 5 years ago
that shows how open minded u are!and how decent!"u dont get angry when someone disrespect master jesus"peace be upon him":in cartoons:south park fr example:movies even in porn!"the cross on naked ladies"and now when someone discuss the credibelity of the bible u curs!?well goin kid ur makin a great impact on us
lamomie23 5 years ago
P1/5
matt4:10 Then Jesus said to him, Begone, Satan! For it has been written, You shall worship the Lord your God, and HIM ALONE shall you serve.
IS ONE PERSON /UNIT/ENTITY NOT THE PACKAGE MORE THAN ONE IN IT.NOT THREE ( him not them))
123onlyfacts 5 years ago
u didnt answer the questions?what is wrong don't u understand english"ok i'll be slow:GOD became man"accordin to u"IF GOD died to PAY for the sin... ok"HE"GOD"PAYED WHO"??if u didnt understand this learn about other religions"maybe u can find a resonable religion"
lamomie23 5 years ago
dude thry to read your english and understand what you wrote --god is man -bull crap
arabiantxn 5 years ago
P2/5
job25:4 How then can man be justified and righteous before God? Or how can he who is born of a woman be pure and clean?
pHow your god was born from woman?
AND THAT WOMAN stayed unclean for few weeks .even holy made her unclean.
123onlyfacts 5 years ago
P3/5
And plus john the Baptist was filled with holy spirit in womb (not like jesus after baptizing by him to receive holy spirit at age 31 yrs old)
And and sinless man already died before jesus so many of them like john the Baptist.
if the only man part of combo of man-god died so the combo did not die.where was the great scarify already so many sinless men died for it
123onlyfacts 5 years ago
P4/5
And also wasn't it pagan's virtues to scarify man for god
And godly virtue was to scarify animals for god not god for god !Next question is was the law of god that had to be done by the holy/godly people than enemies of god romans/pagans for forgiveness of sin! AND THERE WAS ALTAR TO SPRINKLE On,
123onlyfacts 5 years ago
p5/5
not the the sross the sign of pagan's god sign(sun-god)
And the last question is wasn't the law of god male lamb was for burning offer not for sin offering and it had to be female lamb for sins offering so the god-lamb combo was the wrong one!
And if the adam was forgiven /original sin then every body should be born sinless since jesus's death!!?
123onlyfacts 5 years ago
as salaamu alaykum, you are a good man, may Allah swt be pleased with you.
Bilaljabbar 5 years ago
I agree that the birth of Jesus was a sign for mankind but the unusualness of the birth is not an evidence for Divinity. Simply because God always was and always will be, so can not have a birthday. Peace, fot
thefotfoundation 5 years ago
The Quran also reminds us that "the likeness of Jesus before Allah is as the likeness of Adam before Allah". One had no father the other had no father or mother, so is Adam a bigger God?
OneMJDN 5 years ago
Jesus was the physical manisfestation of pure God-consciousness. As with all physical form, the body of the Christ died. "The word became flesh" as I understand it to mean is Jesus was one with God. Was he God? Well, he was God on earth.
rob2nyc 5 years ago
If the manifestation was physical and he was God on earth, then do you believe that God can die? Peace, fot
thefotfoundation 5 years ago
Of course not, don't be ridiculous. You just read that I wrote Jesus' counsciousness was God. Consciousness never dies. You can play semantics with the christian fanatics. It astounds me how unspiritual religious people are.
rob2nyc 5 years ago
You actually said that the manifestation was physical. After that you also said that the physical form (Christ) died. Now you say the consciousness of Jesus was God, conscience of course is not physical. But I do agree that God can not die, so why was an earthly God manifestation needed? Peace, fot.
thefotfoundation 5 years ago
It's difficult to discuss such things with religious people because they will only see through the filter of their own beliefs. My beliefs are more mystical than strict. Jesus' consciousness was pure God-consciousness, but he was still physical. His form died, his consciousness does not. Life has no opposite, only birth does. I don't know how else to put it. You can play lawyer if you wish, but language is limiting.
rob2nyc 5 years ago
I understand that you say it is difficult to express your ideas, but language is our only medium. I only examine and ask to clarify what you believe, which is reasonable. I would suggest that if you base your belief in scripture then show how this scripture expresses what you believe. Peace, fot
thefotfoundation 5 years ago
My bone is not with Islam, but with religious dogma in general. I've gotten into quite a few arguments with christians and it goes in circles, I suspect this is where we're heading here. Religion to me is only one step in consciousness. I'm not equipt enough to discuss something I give little credence to, something that I deem has become destructive to humanity. If I do study religion, it is only as a pointer and nothing more. Peace to you.
rob2nyc 5 years ago
I hope your study leads you to establish that the one step you are going to take in your conscience journey is the correct one. Peace to you also, fot
thefotfoundation 5 years ago
Religion cannot be such a riddle. God does not send a message or a teaching to confuse the people. Christians should wake up.
moali68 5 years ago
all who Allah guides there is none to lead astray. all who Allah leads astray there is none to guide. the Bible is not confusing as long as you understand the difference between Paul and the followers of Jesus. so why do Muslims believe God leads people astray. maybe he led Muhammed astray?
qwertyfshag 5 years ago
All whom Allah Guides there is none to lead astray and all whom Allah leaves to stray there is none to guide aright. One word can make such a difference. Peace, fot
thefotfoundation 5 years ago
ok but why would Allah leave them to stray? are they not worthy of being guided?
qwertyfshag 5 years ago
God (Allah) has sent guidance for everyone as we are all equal and worthy of guidance. If you choose to accept the guidance you are guided and if you choose to reject then you go astray. This is us using our free will. If God determined whether or not you were guided (i.e made the choice for you) then with what right can He hold you accountable? Peace, fot
thefotfoundation 5 years ago
"And Our word unto a thing, when We intend it, is only that We say unto it: Be ! and it is." ( An-Nahl, 16:39)
journeytojannah 5 years ago
i am a montheist and am constantly riticuled for it. but that is the whole story of the Jews; one group of people that refused to bow to any other God. in the Bible it constantly says God is one and worship him alone. peace and blessings.
qwertyfshag 5 years ago
i explain in my own theology. first Jesus was the word of God made into flesh. just like when God word in the begining turned into earth and light and animals, ect.. he said let there be light and there was. so in essence his word became light. likewise his word became a man. this man was like a copy of God. God's spriit dwelt inside him just as it did the other prophets. so the flesh died which was God's word.
qwertyfshag 5 years ago
It seems that you believe that Jesus is a created being who essentially is like the other Prophets. I dont understand what you mean by this man was like a copy of God? Peace, fot
thefotfoundation 5 years ago
SubhanAllah lollllllllllll, May Allah bless u Ameen.
journeytojannah 5 years ago