@igorfly21 you really should get a better education...simply being in the armed forces does not have a single thing to do with being a member of the Nazi party. Many in the armed forces weren't even there by choice - for many, it was mandatory - if you didn't, worse than you can think could happen to you, or your family. My Grandmother's father was one of them - he wasn't even German, or Nazi - he was Estonian, and hated Germans and Russians-but was forced to join when they fled.
@igorfly21 the DeutscheMarine had NOTHING to do with Nazi policy and were notoriously anti the dictatorial regime. They were just a tool of Hitler's government and they would have had way of saying no! Learn your facts before you open your mouth you fuck-wit !
It makes my skin crawl how cruelly and coldly the Brit talks about the Bismarck having to be sunk. I wonder how he would feel if a German had talked about the Hood in the same manner? Also, interestingly, was there any proof that the ship was scuttled? I've never heard anyone search for any evidence of that.
@starlionblue Robert Ballard's book mentions evidence that the Bismarck was scuttled not sunk outright. Ballard himself states that Bismarck could have floated for days had the British ceased fire and left her.
Bismarck threatened the convoys that kept Britain fighting and had sunk the pride of the Royal Navy. If Bismarck had made it to France and been used with the Tirpitz the war could have taken a very different turn.
if only germany have much time to build there navy the tides of war will favor nazi they got the bismarck and the tirpitz and i know at the time nazi is also much bigger battleship than the bismarck and much more powerful
Este barco era indestructible!! Está muy entero!!!! Hay una versión que dice que los Ingleses le tiraron con todo lo que tenían y no lo pudieron hundir, por eso los Alemanes -por miedo a que tomen el barco- abrieron las compuertas para que se hundiera. QUE BARCO!!!!!!!!
@TheAdolfo1960 sí, lo que es un barco que fue ...... pero todos los barcos de guerra de su clase estaban muy abiertos que les dio la estabilidad cuando se disparaban los cañones grandes. alemanes se hundió su
mal buques dañados (su llamada "scuttling") soplando para arriba.
Too many good young men died on the HMS Hood and the Bismarck. This whole bloody war cost europe as a whole too many lives that could have been used much more wisely.
Never forget, always remember. Unity and peace are the keys to our future, not divergence and war.
Rest in peace, whoever you were, from whichever country you came from. Your sons and daughters will do better as peaceful members our europe.
No U-Boat captain would EVER have fired on these British waships if they were rescueing German sailors. They would have known that there was no german ship nearby that could have rescued them (survivors of the Bismack)
@beastatlay "Silly twat." LOL. Look in the mirror to find the silly twat. As for U-Boat attack, there has never I mean never been any written evidence to suggest that Captain Martin received that news. Verbal, but no written evidence. And, we're not talking allied seamen. We're talking about 700+ German sailors left behind. You're a fucking idiot with your comments. Circumstantial evidence has always pointed to Martin leaving them behind on purpose. But we may never know for sure. Ciao
@AnteyPL You missed it. "Battleship without crew is harmless junk." LOL. A comment worthy of such a "brilliant mind."
You simply don't understand. I don't wonder if you can read or not, because if you could, you'd understand that if Captain Martin had purposely left German sailors in the water to die, then Captain Martin, under Royal Navy regulations would be guilty of murder. Did he commit murder? We may never know.
But one thing that is certain: you don't have a bloody clue!!. Ciao.
Where in RN Fighting Instructions does it say that leaving sailors in the water is "murder"? Nowhere, you silly twat. You just made it up. RN ships were, in fact, strictly instructed to leave *their own men* in the water, and not to pick up survivors, where there was threat of U-boat attack - German submarines had sunk British ships picking up survivors in both world wars (HMS Hogue, Cressy, Patroclus, etc.). The vast majority of seamen left to die in the water were Allied, not German.
That's what I can't stand about the Brits...they lost the Hood in battle, and they took it upon themselves to let Captain Martin "get even." Then they celebrated the "great victory."
If all the Brits could have had Ted Briggs attitude, well, then, I could respect the Brits for their actions, but the Brits are pretty devilish. Enough said!
@AnteyPL There is no honor in dealing that way with Germans or anyone else. If Captain Martin left survivors in the water on purpose, then he's guilty of murder.
If things were reversed and the Germans were "avenging" the Bismarck, the ugly Brits would be howling "war crimes" if the Hood were limping home and attacked by the Kriegsmarine until she was sunk. I am blown away by how callous they felt about the Bismarck considering she was technically defeated before the last salvo. There are still rumors that they didn't really sink her but the scuttling charges may have done the job too.
@starlionblue That's simply not true. An enemy ship is attacked until she is either sunk or strikes her colours. No one "lets a ship go" because she is damaged. If anything, that's when you press your advantage. Your point is hollow.
@starlionblue you dont have any clue about what you are talking about. A ship will be attacked if she doesnt strike her colours.The only attack on a defenseless ship done by the allies was the Laconia incident, where US bombers attacked a U-boat rescuing survivors. If you need more info on the "ugly brits", check out survival rates for german pow in british captivity (lower than expected in civilian life), or Adm, Cunningham who after Cape Matapan garanteed safe passage to rescue survivors
who sank bismarck? the royal navy did hands down. they turned it into a burning sinking hulk. enough said. r.i.p. bruno rzonca bismarck survivour, you was a good friend to sit with me, drink with me and talk to me about the worst day of your life as you put it..............peace is the answer not war..
ahh that bismarck crewman stated things brilliantly, both sides could have sunk the ship, if those scuttling charges went off then they would have done at the same time as the torpedos struck the hull ... so its not really possible to determine who did it :S
At least in a Canadian prison camp they were better off than most POWs worldwide. Probably not great but they weren't starved or brutalized. Except some escapees that encountered a Grizzly bear and turned themselves in.
For whatever reason Scharnhorst and Gneisenau made no attempt to rescue the 900 men left in the water after HMS Glorious was sunk and most of them died. Also, although I'm not English, I think that anyone who believes the Royal Navy needs numerical superiority to fight courageously should Google HMS Acasta, Glowworm or Rawalpindi.
@yamsid Big deal, the British didn't take aboard any sailors from the Bismarck after she'd been sunk. Even a man who had lost BOTH his arms was ignored and the BRITISH sailor who jumped over to save him was court-martialed!
The crew of the Bismarck abandoned the ship and scuttled it. There was a german Submarine. 116 men survived - the HMS Dorsetshire rescued 68 men , the HMS Maori 25 men, the german U-74 3 men and the weather Ship "Sachsenwald" 2 men.
RIP to all fallen sailors and soldiers of every nation who fought in the WW2.
@gamesbok Yamashiro sunk by 6 US battleships @ Leyte Gulf. Scharnhors sunk by Duke of York @ North Cape. Kirishima sunk by Washington & South Dakota @ Guadalcanal.
@brutussmithicus Kirishima (霧島?) was the Imperial Japanese Navy's fourth Kongō -class battlecruiser.
'German Battle Cruiser Scharnhorst. '
At the battle of Surigao Strait on October 25, 1944, Krishima came under attack and was sunk by U.S. naval forces with all hands lost, receiving four hits from destroyer torpedoes
@gamesbok Oh dear, you don't give up do you. Any distiction between battleships & battlecruisers was meaningless by 1941. Most BC's were up-armoured & few could do more then 28kn by then. All new BS's could do at least 28kn.
Kirishima was classed as a battleship by IJN & USN after re-construction. And she wasn't at Suriago Strait, she was sunk by US battleships @ Guadalcanal. The IJN BS sunk @ Suriago was Yamashiro, she was damaged by torpedo hits but sailed on & confronted the US battleships
@brutussmithicus Alright, OK, but I will insist that Scharnhorst was a battlecruser. She was specifically designed as such, operated as such,, and I think her combat record, compared with say Bismarck ('Cannot sink this ship with gunfire') proves my point.
@brutussmithicus Hi, you may have seen it but there is a documentary somewhere on the net (darned if I can remember the name) that unites survivors of Kirishima and Washington. Like most "armchair admirals" I can only imagine and hope never to experience 14 and 16 inch guns firing point blank in the night but the memories of those Japanese and American sailors are worth hearing.
These ancient mariners from both sides form a last generation of chivalrous "men of honour". Mutual respect, even in the mutually murderous intent of war... Their attitude... so different from the mutual contempt of our "modern" conflict in the Middle East. I can't see any our generation being filmed as so respectfull or regretfull 50 years from now, regardless of who "wins", regardless of race, religion or nationality. Something special will be lost to our world when the last of these pass.
I really appreciate you putting all 10 parts of this. I truly enjoyed it. As to the discussions about who did what... I guess it's up o the naval traditions of one's country. There were plenty of unintended horrors inflicted in all naval engagements. People look at these monstrosities as single units... and often fail to see the hundreds of people who serve on them.
Regardless of whether the Germans scuttled the ship or not, the Bismarck was a flaming hulk, Nelson and KGV had tore it to shreds. I cant imagine the havoc and terror of it on board.
please , no, , UMBRAGE WITH EACH OTHER.. BUT , POINT OF HISTORY, THE BRITS , WERE TRYING TO PICK UP SURVIVORS , WHEN THEY WERE RADIO'ED THAT GERMAN SHIPS WERE APPROACHING ..
If it was a Walt Disney world, hey, everyone would have let the Brits finish picking up the survivors , but , reality was not so , it hurt , those British Seamen, to have to haul aboard who, they could , & then ,. have to leave the other survivors !!!~ Dont blame the Brits!! they saved as many as they could
Will someone explain to me why a commander who knows he's going to lose his ship because it's badly damaged and hopelessly outnumbered doesn't just fire off a few rounds to save face put the crew over the side, run up a white flag and scuttle the ship therby avoiding all that unnecessary carnage.
Im just curious to find out...but has anyone ever thought that the U-Boat Sighting during the Rescue Efforts after the sinking of the Bismarck was a Hoax committed by a British Sailor and as a Resentment towards the Bismarck Crew for the sinking of the Hood?
No or why bother picking up any survivors at all,or are you trying to say that U-74 wasn't in the area? . Say what you mean if you want to accuse people of war crimes cite some evidence to back it up rather than make snide insinuations .
Why dont you relax, if I knew that U 74 was in the area after the sinking, I would not have posted the question.
And upon doing more research, U74 wasnt the only boat in the vicinity, U556 was also near by and heading back to Base in France after an attack on a convoy.
As for your insinuation comment, who said anything about War Crimes, because a War Crime was ever Committed from either side.
EvilFingers, I think that a lot of people have wondered that and I think a lot believe it. But I think it's going to be like 'Who Sank the Bismarck?' Royal Navy or her own crew? It will be a question that will never have a definitive answer. However, I do have relatives over in England and here also and I DO know how resentful they can be and how unforgiving they can be. They are all about revenge.
Youtube cut me off but what I want to say is that I'm not saying that the Bismarck's men were purposly left in the water because personally I don't believe that. I'm just saying, I know how resentive the British can be. So I will just leave it at that!
I Agree with you besides they wanted revenge because of the HMS Hood & they had to outnumber the Bismarck to sink it...not so honorable and again quantity against quality... don't you think.
Have you watched Expedition Bismarck by James Cameron which is the last known documentary on the Bismarck.
Near the end of the program, videos from the ROV were taken below Bismarck's Waterline which clearly shows torpedo hits on both sides of the ship's Outer Hull, but no damage to the Inner Hull, which proves that the crew did sink their own ship.
Yes I've seen it, it's my fav documenatry on the Bismarck. I think a lot of people now believe the Bismarck was scuttled but it's still a debate and always will be, at least with the British who will always refuse that the Bismarck was scuttled. They want the credit and will take it no matter what some movie director says about the subject even though he was there and saw the damage for himself!!
The whole battle was very sad with the amount of casulties on both sides. Most were young men and never knew what was going to happen to them..
We all know a lot of work went into locating the Germans, but I still think it was the HMS Rodney that blew the Bismark apart. Even one on one I still think the Rodney was unstoppable on that morning and the ship never got the credit it deserves.
I think the Dorsetshire's captain was right to set sail because if a U-boat torpedoed the ship then no one would have survived. But that would have to be a devastating descision. 115 survivors are better than none.
you are not able to make such an ignorant statement...these men...all both sides will be judged by only God...and damn your soul for speaking of that which you know not nor experienced.
jjjazzycraig good point only god could Judge them lets prey he gives Bismarck's Crew and Hood's Crew Peace. They deserve it. I hope God saw them as soldiers fighting for there country.
The British would have picked up the survivors, but the U-boat that was ordered to recover the Bismark's logbooks was sighted and so the rescue had to abandoned. If they had stayed away those men would have been rescued. The U boat had no torpedoes left so it could do nothing anyway. You'd think they could have figured out what would happen if they were seen in area.
There is your "Royal Nay", what a gay way of fighting, 16 to 1 thats no match. And they even able if sinking the Bismark, the captain gave the order to scuttle and abandon the ship, he sank her own ship!
either she sank or she would be delivered on a silver plater to the british. her shell, her superior radar, and her intelligence. The captain made a wise decision
It was War and the Bismarck had to be sunk. Whether 16-1 is fair or not is irrelevant. It should be viewed as a great compliment and symbol of respect for the Bismarck, that the Royal Navy sent 16 ships against her.
To stop a ship to pick up survivors in a war zone would be a crazy thing to do, a friend of mine father was in ww2 escorting convoys, and he said if you stopped to pick up your own men, ie merchant navy personel you could be on a charge for endangering your ship and its crew.....was is hell.
@N20TO Even this team wouldn't able to face aircraft carriers and air strikes. Sinking of Price of Wales and Pearl Harbor strike proved, that era of battleships were over and era of carriers and naval aircraft begun.
I'll tell You what - leaving 700 seamen in water because of some (probably unexisting) u-boot was a war crime. There is huge difference between revenge and a cold blooded murder. I don't believe that any german u-boot commander would ever fire a topedo against ship which just undertake german sailors. Very shaming for british navy. Shame on You.
bercik1964. Like your navy or any other wouldnt have done the same if there was a u-boat alert. It was not done out of revenge. Grow up bercik. There is no shame, only pride for the royal navy that comes from people who visit from all over the world. I should know, i live in Portsmouth, Britain's naval capital. The Hood and Bismarck are the two most famous warships in the world and to honour those dead on both ships, both navies and learn the lessons of war for the future. PEACE OUT.
That's just plain sad. I feel sad for both sides. I don't think any of those young men wanted to be killing each other. I wish the next time a war comes about, all the young people say no and tell the people responsible "You fight it yourselves were going home"
I'm sorry, so sorry. Please accept my apology
igorfly21 1 week ago
Nazis, go fuck yourself ..We should throw a nuke bomb on that Fucking Berlin next time...
igorfly21 1 month ago
@igorfly21 you really should get a better education...simply being in the armed forces does not have a single thing to do with being a member of the Nazi party. Many in the armed forces weren't even there by choice - for many, it was mandatory - if you didn't, worse than you can think could happen to you, or your family. My Grandmother's father was one of them - he wasn't even German, or Nazi - he was Estonian, and hated Germans and Russians-but was forced to join when they fled.
sonbuhitsunei 1 week ago
Men who wants to wage war, should wage war themselves and not send young men to die in their place.
Dreez76 1 month ago 2
RIP To the Crews of Both Bismarck and Hood.
TitanicBismarck1987 1 month ago
Long Live the Royal Navy....Die Fucking nazis
igorfly21 4 months ago
@igorfly21 the DeutscheMarine had NOTHING to do with Nazi policy and were notoriously anti the dictatorial regime. They were just a tool of Hitler's government and they would have had way of saying no! Learn your facts before you open your mouth you fuck-wit !
IRememberTheOldDays 1 month ago
It makes my skin crawl how cruelly and coldly the Brit talks about the Bismarck having to be sunk. I wonder how he would feel if a German had talked about the Hood in the same manner? Also, interestingly, was there any proof that the ship was scuttled? I've never heard anyone search for any evidence of that.
starlionblue 4 months ago
@starlionblue Robert Ballard's book mentions evidence that the Bismarck was scuttled not sunk outright. Ballard himself states that Bismarck could have floated for days had the British ceased fire and left her.
Bismarck threatened the convoys that kept Britain fighting and had sunk the pride of the Royal Navy. If Bismarck had made it to France and been used with the Tirpitz the war could have taken a very different turn.
gandhicakes 4 months ago
Excellent upload, fascinating documentary. I raise a glass to those brave men who fought on both sides!!!
add996 5 months ago
Bismark suck
allanguo99 5 months ago
Did the Germans have any u boats in the area? Oh! There were.
slash1reader 6 months ago
Did the Germans have any u boats in the area?
slash1reader 6 months ago
R.I.P to all the Bismarck and H.M.S Hood crew!
666crazytrain1 6 months ago 2
if only germany have much time to build there navy the tides of war will favor nazi they got the bismarck and the tirpitz and i know at the time nazi is also much bigger battleship than the bismarck and much more powerful
carlogwapo1234 6 months ago
So, even if they wanted to, they couldn't transfer Bismarck's crew & onto Tirpitz?.
23456789Alexis 7 months ago
Este barco era indestructible!! Está muy entero!!!! Hay una versión que dice que los Ingleses le tiraron con todo lo que tenían y no lo pudieron hundir, por eso los Alemanes -por miedo a que tomen el barco- abrieron las compuertas para que se hundiera. QUE BARCO!!!!!!!!
TheAdolfo1960 8 months ago
@TheAdolfo1960 sí, lo que es un barco que fue ...... pero todos los barcos de guerra de su clase estaban muy abiertos que les dio la estabilidad cuando se disparaban los cañones grandes. alemanes se hundió su
mal buques dañados (su llamada "scuttling") soplando para arriba.
gyreenedoc 8 months ago
HMS HOOD RIP.
devenII7 9 months ago 2
Too many good young men died on the HMS Hood and the Bismarck. This whole bloody war cost europe as a whole too many lives that could have been used much more wisely.
Never forget, always remember. Unity and peace are the keys to our future, not divergence and war.
Rest in peace, whoever you were, from whichever country you came from. Your sons and daughters will do better as peaceful members our europe.
Never again.
wupperkind1 10 months ago
No U-Boat captain would EVER have fired on these British waships if they were rescueing German sailors. They would have known that there was no german ship nearby that could have rescued them (survivors of the Bismack)
notsureyou 10 months ago
@beastatlay "Silly twat." LOL. Look in the mirror to find the silly twat. As for U-Boat attack, there has never I mean never been any written evidence to suggest that Captain Martin received that news. Verbal, but no written evidence. And, we're not talking allied seamen. We're talking about 700+ German sailors left behind. You're a fucking idiot with your comments. Circumstantial evidence has always pointed to Martin leaving them behind on purpose. But we may never know for sure. Ciao
rjc071 10 months ago
@AnteyPL You missed it. "Battleship without crew is harmless junk." LOL. A comment worthy of such a "brilliant mind."
You simply don't understand. I don't wonder if you can read or not, because if you could, you'd understand that if Captain Martin had purposely left German sailors in the water to die, then Captain Martin, under Royal Navy regulations would be guilty of murder. Did he commit murder? We may never know.
But one thing that is certain: you don't have a bloody clue!!. Ciao.
rjc071 11 months ago
@rjc071
Where in RN Fighting Instructions does it say that leaving sailors in the water is "murder"? Nowhere, you silly twat. You just made it up. RN ships were, in fact, strictly instructed to leave *their own men* in the water, and not to pick up survivors, where there was threat of U-boat attack - German submarines had sunk British ships picking up survivors in both world wars (HMS Hogue, Cressy, Patroclus, etc.). The vast majority of seamen left to die in the water were Allied, not German.
beastatlay 10 months ago
That's what I can't stand about the Brits...they lost the Hood in battle, and they took it upon themselves to let Captain Martin "get even." Then they celebrated the "great victory."
If all the Brits could have had Ted Briggs attitude, well, then, I could respect the Brits for their actions, but the Brits are pretty devilish. Enough said!
rjc071 11 months ago
@rjc071
.... sure, but it's a proper way to deal with Germans.
AnteyPL 11 months ago
@AnteyPL There is no honor in dealing that way with Germans or anyone else. If Captain Martin left survivors in the water on purpose, then he's guilty of murder.
rjc071 11 months ago
@rjc071
Perhaps you missed it, but it was precisely the point - kill the Germans. Battleship without crew is harmless junk.
AnteyPL 11 months ago
@rjc071 What the hell do you know?
SuperQuiller 10 months ago
@rjc071 Yes, I agree. From you is enough said. Be quiet now.
SuperQuiller 10 months ago
that was a good history lesson thanks now I know more about my american history I always thought my americans sunk her but I was wrong
gallant1987 1 year ago
very sad story..all british ship that involved in the sinking of bismarck were sunk,,,
theawesome02 1 year ago
@theawesome02 You mean a very untrue story .
iroscoe 11 months ago
Ark Royal was sunk by a U-Boat, not by airpower.
wilmanric1 1 year ago
Sooo stupid... just a few cheap aeroplanes could sink a monster like Bismack or Hood and 2000 men dead. Ships of that age were in fact too weak.
TK2008BEST 1 year ago
If things were reversed and the Germans were "avenging" the Bismarck, the ugly Brits would be howling "war crimes" if the Hood were limping home and attacked by the Kriegsmarine until she was sunk. I am blown away by how callous they felt about the Bismarck considering she was technically defeated before the last salvo. There are still rumors that they didn't really sink her but the scuttling charges may have done the job too.
starlionblue 1 year ago
@starlionblue What have our lack of good looks got to do with anything pretty boy?....
iroscoe 1 year ago
@starlionblue That's simply not true. An enemy ship is attacked until she is either sunk or strikes her colours. No one "lets a ship go" because she is damaged. If anything, that's when you press your advantage. Your point is hollow.
wilmanric1 1 year ago
@starlionblue you dont have any clue about what you are talking about. A ship will be attacked if she doesnt strike her colours.The only attack on a defenseless ship done by the allies was the Laconia incident, where US bombers attacked a U-boat rescuing survivors. If you need more info on the "ugly brits", check out survival rates for german pow in british captivity (lower than expected in civilian life), or Adm, Cunningham who after Cape Matapan garanteed safe passage to rescue survivors
higfny 1 year ago
who sank bismarck? the royal navy did hands down. they turned it into a burning sinking hulk. enough said. r.i.p. bruno rzonca bismarck survivour, you was a good friend to sit with me, drink with me and talk to me about the worst day of your life as you put it..............peace is the answer not war..
glynamus 1 year ago
Amazing integrity do those have who can rescue and care for their enemy
Cityj0hn 1 year ago
ahh that bismarck crewman stated things brilliantly, both sides could have sunk the ship, if those scuttling charges went off then they would have done at the same time as the torpedos struck the hull ... so its not really possible to determine who did it :S
GamingLeeLee 1 year ago
I can't imagine what it must have been like to abandon ship when hundreds of rounds still impacted the ship.. How can you survive that..
Mueiwark 1 year ago
At least in a Canadian prison camp they were better off than most POWs worldwide. Probably not great but they weren't starved or brutalized. Except some escapees that encountered a Grizzly bear and turned themselves in.
yamsid 1 year ago
For whatever reason Scharnhorst and Gneisenau made no attempt to rescue the 900 men left in the water after HMS Glorious was sunk and most of them died. Also, although I'm not English, I think that anyone who believes the Royal Navy needs numerical superiority to fight courageously should Google HMS Acasta, Glowworm or Rawalpindi.
yamsid 1 year ago
@yamsid Big deal, the British didn't take aboard any sailors from the Bismarck after she'd been sunk. Even a man who had lost BOTH his arms was ignored and the BRITISH sailor who jumped over to save him was court-martialed!
starlionblue 1 year ago
@starlionblue British ships left immidiately because there was a u-boat alarm...
TK2008BEST 1 year ago
Many People say the Bismarck was the Strongest ship,
but it is the USS Iowa
PS: Rest in Peace Hood And Bismarck Crew
superpim100 1 year ago
The crew of the Bismarck abandoned the ship and scuttled it. There was a german Submarine. 116 men survived - the HMS Dorsetshire rescued 68 men , the HMS Maori 25 men, the german U-74 3 men and the weather Ship "Sachsenwald" 2 men.
RIP to all fallen sailors and soldiers of every nation who fought in the WW2.
from Germany
JazzJaRa 1 year ago
The last ever Battleship - Battleship action.
gamesbok 1 year ago
@gamesbok apart from leyte gulf (the biggest battleship duel of the war), north cape, guadalcanal, ....
brutussmithicus 1 year ago
@brutussmithicus None of which actually include Battleship on Battleship action.
gamesbok 1 year ago
@gamesbok Yamashiro sunk by 6 US battleships @ Leyte Gulf. Scharnhors sunk by Duke of York @ North Cape. Kirishima sunk by Washington & South Dakota @ Guadalcanal.
brutussmithicus 1 year ago
@brutussmithicus Kirishima (霧島?) was the Imperial Japanese Navy's fourth Kongō -class battlecruiser.
'German Battle Cruiser Scharnhorst. '
At the battle of Surigao Strait on October 25, 1944, Krishima came under attack and was sunk by U.S. naval forces with all hands lost, receiving four hits from destroyer torpedoes
gamesbok 1 year ago
@gamesbok Oh dear, you don't give up do you. Any distiction between battleships & battlecruisers was meaningless by 1941. Most BC's were up-armoured & few could do more then 28kn by then. All new BS's could do at least 28kn.
Kirishima was classed as a battleship by IJN & USN after re-construction. And she wasn't at Suriago Strait, she was sunk by US battleships @ Guadalcanal. The IJN BS sunk @ Suriago was Yamashiro, she was damaged by torpedo hits but sailed on & confronted the US battleships
brutussmithicus 1 year ago
@brutussmithicus Alright, OK, but I will insist that Scharnhorst was a battlecruser. She was specifically designed as such, operated as such,, and I think her combat record, compared with say Bismarck ('Cannot sink this ship with gunfire') proves my point.
gamesbok 1 year ago
@brutussmithicus Hi, you may have seen it but there is a documentary somewhere on the net (darned if I can remember the name) that unites survivors of Kirishima and Washington. Like most "armchair admirals" I can only imagine and hope never to experience 14 and 16 inch guns firing point blank in the night but the memories of those Japanese and American sailors are worth hearing.
yamsid 1 year ago
Wait a minute. HMS Ark Royal was sunk by an U-boat, HMS Hermes was sunk by airplanes
Sokar2488 1 year ago
The Bismarck sank, doesn't matter who sank it, whether scuttled by her crew or sunk by torpedoes.
Sokar2488 1 year ago
Are there any records of German sailors saved by U-boats?
Lachausis 1 year ago
These ancient mariners from both sides form a last generation of chivalrous "men of honour". Mutual respect, even in the mutually murderous intent of war... Their attitude... so different from the mutual contempt of our "modern" conflict in the Middle East. I can't see any our generation being filmed as so respectfull or regretfull 50 years from now, regardless of who "wins", regardless of race, religion or nationality. Something special will be lost to our world when the last of these pass.
lordchickenhawk 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
would have been a good documentary if the yanks hadn't made it.
wapdink 1 year ago
Well it seems you guys weren't smart enough to make one of you're own, so someone had to do it.
oiljerk 1 year ago
war sucks.....
baskovich 2 years ago 2
it does make for some good tv thou.
snowboredsnj 1 year ago
I really appreciate you putting all 10 parts of this. I truly enjoyed it. As to the discussions about who did what... I guess it's up o the naval traditions of one's country. There were plenty of unintended horrors inflicted in all naval engagements. People look at these monstrosities as single units... and often fail to see the hundreds of people who serve on them.
hagesenjin 2 years ago
Regardless of whether the Germans scuttled the ship or not, the Bismarck was a flaming hulk, Nelson and KGV had tore it to shreds. I cant imagine the havoc and terror of it on board.
HelmutVillam 2 years ago
please , no, , UMBRAGE WITH EACH OTHER.. BUT , POINT OF HISTORY, THE BRITS , WERE TRYING TO PICK UP SURVIVORS , WHEN THEY WERE RADIO'ED THAT GERMAN SHIPS WERE APPROACHING ..
If it was a Walt Disney world, hey, everyone would have let the Brits finish picking up the survivors , but , reality was not so , it hurt , those British Seamen, to have to haul aboard who, they could , & then ,. have to leave the other survivors !!!~ Dont blame the Brits!! they saved as many as they could
yukonnahanni 2 years ago 5
Will someone explain to me why a commander who knows he's going to lose his ship because it's badly damaged and hopelessly outnumbered doesn't just fire off a few rounds to save face put the crew over the side, run up a white flag and scuttle the ship therby avoiding all that unnecessary carnage.
logancody07 2 years ago 3
Never give your ship up to your enemy.
G777GUN 2 years ago
Im just curious to find out...but has anyone ever thought that the U-Boat Sighting during the Rescue Efforts after the sinking of the Bismarck was a Hoax committed by a British Sailor and as a Resentment towards the Bismarck Crew for the sinking of the Hood?
EvilFingers 2 years ago
No or why bother picking up any survivors at all,or are you trying to say that U-74 wasn't in the area? . Say what you mean if you want to accuse people of war crimes cite some evidence to back it up rather than make snide insinuations .
iroscoe 2 years ago
Why dont you relax, if I knew that U 74 was in the area after the sinking, I would not have posted the question.
And upon doing more research, U74 wasnt the only boat in the vicinity, U556 was also near by and heading back to Base in France after an attack on a convoy.
As for your insinuation comment, who said anything about War Crimes, because a War Crime was ever Committed from either side.
EvilFingers 2 years ago
Im perfectly relaxed,if you knew the answer to the question why put it out there unless you were trying to say something without saying something .
iroscoe 2 years ago
Like I said...if I knew the answer, "I would not have posted the question"
EvilFingers 2 years ago
EvilFingers, I think that a lot of people have wondered that and I think a lot believe it. But I think it's going to be like 'Who Sank the Bismarck?' Royal Navy or her own crew? It will be a question that will never have a definitive answer. However, I do have relatives over in England and here also and I DO know how resentful they can be and how unforgiving they can be. They are all about revenge.
spookespook 2 years ago
Youtube cut me off but what I want to say is that I'm not saying that the Bismarck's men were purposly left in the water because personally I don't believe that. I'm just saying, I know how resentive the British can be. So I will just leave it at that!
Sorry if I offended anyone by saying this.
spookespook 2 years ago
@spookespook
I Agree with you besides they wanted revenge because of the HMS Hood & they had to outnumber the Bismarck to sink it...not so honorable and again quantity against quality... don't you think.
herbdell 2 years ago
Honorable?,it was a war not a medieval joust,the fate of nations was at stake .
iroscoe 1 year ago 4
@herbdell true
Picard578 1 year ago
Have you watched Expedition Bismarck by James Cameron which is the last known documentary on the Bismarck.
Near the end of the program, videos from the ROV were taken below Bismarck's Waterline which clearly shows torpedo hits on both sides of the ship's Outer Hull, but no damage to the Inner Hull, which proves that the crew did sink their own ship.
EvilFingers 2 years ago
Yes I've seen it, it's my fav documenatry on the Bismarck. I think a lot of people now believe the Bismarck was scuttled but it's still a debate and always will be, at least with the British who will always refuse that the Bismarck was scuttled. They want the credit and will take it no matter what some movie director says about the subject even though he was there and saw the damage for himself!!
spookespook 2 years ago
@EvilFingers Except the U-Boat, U97 I think, was actually there, although it had no torpedos left.
gamesbok 1 year ago
Long live KMG Bismarck and long live HMS Hood! Both fought with valor!
easye1989 2 years ago 3
The whole battle was very sad with the amount of casulties on both sides. Most were young men and never knew what was going to happen to them..
We all know a lot of work went into locating the Germans, but I still think it was the HMS Rodney that blew the Bismark apart. Even one on one I still think the Rodney was unstoppable on that morning and the ship never got the credit it deserves.
johnmcluskey 2 years ago
@johnmcluskey 'Cannot sink this ship with gunfire' Bismark was skuttled.
gamesbok 1 year ago
the movies is excellent, thanks you !!
all "Sink The Bismarck" 1~10
vladimir2366fa 2 years ago
Palin 2012
jfkreincarnated 2 years ago
I think the Dorsetshire's captain was right to set sail because if a U-boat torpedoed the ship then no one would have survived. But that would have to be a devastating descision. 115 survivors are better than none.
dave86silv83 2 years ago
Comment removed
giomax78 2 years ago
you are not able to make such an ignorant statement...these men...all both sides will be judged by only God...and damn your soul for speaking of that which you know not nor experienced.
jjjazzycraig 2 years ago
Comment removed
giomax78 2 years ago
jjjazzycraig good point only god could Judge them lets prey he gives Bismarck's Crew and Hood's Crew Peace. They deserve it. I hope God saw them as soldiers fighting for there country.
RMSTitanic87 2 years ago
I feel sorry for both the British and for the Germans. It is really sad to what happened to both Hood and Bismarck.
RMSTitanic87 2 years ago 2
The British would have picked up the survivors, but the U-boat that was ordered to recover the Bismark's logbooks was sighted and so the rescue had to abandoned. If they had stayed away those men would have been rescued. The U boat had no torpedoes left so it could do nothing anyway. You'd think they could have figured out what would happen if they were seen in area.
Gbrltr 2 years ago
There is your "Royal Nay", what a gay way of fighting, 16 to 1 thats no match. And they even able if sinking the Bismark, the captain gave the order to scuttle and abandon the ship, he sank her own ship!
cmquank 2 years ago 2
either she sank or she would be delivered on a silver plater to the british. her shell, her superior radar, and her intelligence. The captain made a wise decision
Andaroly 2 years ago
It was War and the Bismarck had to be sunk. Whether 16-1 is fair or not is irrelevant. It should be viewed as a great compliment and symbol of respect for the Bismarck, that the Royal Navy sent 16 ships against her.
TorraAlta 2 years ago 3
It was a war not a playground punch up .
iroscoe 2 years ago
like Rammstein's song: "in beinfall untergehen". in this way the Bismarck was sunk
Alegoven 2 years ago
esto es pura basura
Alegoven 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
2100 dead. Good. Why the hell would the British even rescue those Germans?? Man, I would have let them all drown like the dogs they are.
DeadfoursMetal 2 years ago
Hail to the Bush baby :P You should really check for some pills to reduce agression in your blood. Peace :)
f16134 2 years ago 3
you obviously just plain don't get it do you.
lostinlifeforever9 2 years ago
To stop a ship to pick up survivors in a war zone would be a crazy thing to do, a friend of mine father was in ww2 escorting convoys, and he said if you stopped to pick up your own men, ie merchant navy personel you could be on a charge for endangering your ship and its crew.....was is hell.
lanclover1945 2 years ago
I don't recall the Bismarck stopped to check for survivors from the Hood.
chaingangcharlie 2 years ago
2100 dead. Good? There not a damn thing good about it. I would have do every thing in my power to rescue them.
RMSTitanic87 2 years ago 2
The Germans should've waited until the Tirpitz was ready. Imagine Bismarck and the Tirpitz side by side in the same unit.
N20TO 3 years ago 4
@N20TO Even this team wouldn't able to face aircraft carriers and air strikes. Sinking of Price of Wales and Pearl Harbor strike proved, that era of battleships were over and era of carriers and naval aircraft begun.
RayPall 7 months ago
@N20TO
air power changes every thing later in the war
spyda2002 7 months ago
@spyda2002 You got that right. HMS Prince of Wales and HMS Repulse would be the next tragic lessons to the Royal Navy.
gandhicakes 4 months ago
Rest in peace Ted Briggs. The last survivor of the Hood.
Rest in peace to HMS Hood and Bismarck and there crew.
YamatoTitanic 3 years ago 21
@YamatoTitanic Amen bro.
MidwayCastaway 7 months ago
Don't fuck with the Queen. pms, etc., - she always gets the last trump card. =)
fuhmeregan 3 years ago
My heart goese out to those poor young sailors on Bismarck. Many who were still Kids.
Same goes for the Hood.
YamatoTitanic 4 years ago 21
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Only the Hood deserves respect. The Bismarck was part of an evil force that would have ended the world as you know it if the Nazis had won the war.
AlbertaGamer 3 years ago
both sides deserve respect regardless if Bismarck was built by the Nazis her were were no Nazis Loonies but were Honorable German Sailor!
YamatoTitanic 3 years ago 4
i agree with u
MURPHinator200 3 years ago
@YamatoTitanic
Pity your heart doesn't go to few million children in Eastern Europe murdered by Germans and - thanks in part to Bismarck's protection.
AnteyPL 11 months ago
@YamatoTitanic
Pity your heart doesn't go to few million children in Eastern Europe murdered by Germans and - thanks in part to Bismarck's protection.
And note difference between emotional attitude of British sailor and cold-blooded, almost proud behaviour of his German counterparts.
AnteyPL 11 months ago
Rest in peace To the crews of Bismarck and Hood.
Sammyoak 4 years ago 7
I'll tell You what - leaving 700 seamen in water because of some (probably unexisting) u-boot was a war crime. There is huge difference between revenge and a cold blooded murder. I don't believe that any german u-boot commander would ever fire a topedo against ship which just undertake german sailors. Very shaming for british navy. Shame on You.
bercik1964 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
you have to be kidding. I dont think we have to remind you, the germans did things a 100 times worse than that, and on purpose.
motofox69 4 years ago
The S.S. yes, the Kriegsmarine, no.
Cheers.
Number7smokesForEver 4 years ago 3
bercik1964. Like your navy or any other wouldnt have done the same if there was a u-boat alert. It was not done out of revenge. Grow up bercik. There is no shame, only pride for the royal navy that comes from people who visit from all over the world. I should know, i live in Portsmouth, Britain's naval capital. The Hood and Bismarck are the two most famous warships in the world and to honour those dead on both ships, both navies and learn the lessons of war for the future. PEACE OUT.
zepsterboy 3 years ago 3
That's just plain sad. I feel sad for both sides. I don't think any of those young men wanted to be killing each other. I wish the next time a war comes about, all the young people say no and tell the people responsible "You fight it yourselves were going home"
Grazydine 4 years ago 4
Bismarck sunk 66 years ago today.
War is evil and stupid. Warmongers are evil.
Peace - Brother Ron
BrotherRon1 4 years ago
learnt alot all 10 thanks mate.
tutor4011 4 years ago 4
welcome glad you enjoyed
kingtiger88 4 years ago
Bismar(c)k, my bad.
72BajaBug 4 years ago
You should watch "Schlachtschiff Bismark" It's an awesome video.
72BajaBug 4 years ago
00:09 - 00:25 Thats just creepy compared to what it was.
72BajaBug 4 years ago
very nice video thanks! 5/5 good series hope u keep up the good stuff cheers !
rawkon91 4 years ago