English is my first language. Maybe it's the accent, but this man is speaking so quickly that I have difficulty understanding him. Do other people have difficulty understanding people who talk very quickly, or is it just me??
Why would it be a bad thing that certain constituencies argue for a lower cap? I mean if it leads to reduction in GHG, why does the intention of constituencies matter?
There is an alternative to the carbon tax and it will reduce emissions, create tens of thousands of jobs and result in a weekly power bill of only $8 per week. Don't believe me? watch?v=qImNRuV4G0Q
Hate the wealthy? Give to the less fortunate? "Even the playing field" ?
Here are average yearly incomes of several countries:
Brazil $8,135
Venezuela $11,444
India $1,054
China $3,212
USA $45,835
To even the playing field, we must "de-develop the USA" , redistribute the wealth globally (take your income) vis cap and trade and other measures. How does socialism look to you now? It's not taking money from the wealthy -- it's taking your money!
You all heard that he likes the carbon tax, right (at least compared to cap and trade)? You see, educated conservatives like this guy can't allow themselves to pretend like we have unlimited fossil fuels. The rest of you people just don't want to believe that (1) we're destroying our environment and (2) we're becoming ever more dependent on the Middle East for our existence. If you hate reason (1), then at least recognize reason (2).
@IneedTodisco CO2 in a natural cycle isn't a pollutant. The additional CO2 that has been locked away in a hydrocarbon form and is reintroduced into the atmosphere is a pollutant. Semantics maybe, but it's true.
Cap and Trade legislation now known as the American Power Act, would have increased taxes on the average household between $1600-$3200. It would have increased gas prices up to $2.58 a gallon. With Obama demanding the cessation of offshore drilling gas prices are expected to increase yet another $5 a gallon, because we would grow dependent upon foreign nations we are not allies with in order to provide our oil. They would invariably price gouge to$10 a gallon gas!
The more radical wing of the new Gaia religion is planning to turn upon its creators and is calling for the sacrifice of our Illuminati Gods to prevent catastrophic earth changes.
Al Gore will be sacrificed along with Kissinger, the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Bilderbergers and some royals for good measure.
Their reasoning is that it is far more appropriate for our Gods to put their lives on the line to save us instead of acting like criminals and stealing our money.
"Will it raise the price of goods and services? Yes, that's the point".
Why is that a good thing? What are they trying to do, reduce the US to a third-world nation? That's what we're becoming.
How is more expensive energy, goods and services a good thing? It will just make our standard of living lower, oh, but the earth will be pretty! That's a bunch of crap!
Check out NASA's latest findings on the solar cycle. Global Climate Change (caused by humans) is a hoax.
cause we'll be "such a better planet" when most of our country is unemployed and have no home to live in... Unemployment is at it's highest since the Great Depression, the currency value is falling, people are losing their homes as it is, and we are trillions in debt. Aside from the fraud of this and the notion of "taxing air", we simply cannot support this bill period.
It is not the job of Congress to "create jobs". Mercury and Venus are getting warmer and they have NO life form.
I have yet to see the g'ment bring rain in a drought, or stop the rain during a flood. But now we think the g'ment can not only control the weather but the climate of the entire planet!
This is just a huge tax to be paid by every man, woman and child in the US to force them to live according to the environmentalists views. It's unconstitutional and unAmerican.
We don't need ANY more taxes! Taxes are killing our companies and destroying our future! Cap and Trade "would be the equivalent of an atomic bomb directed at the U.S. economy, all without any scientific justification," says famed climatologist Dr. S. Fred Singer. It would significantly increase taxes and the cost of energy, forcing many companies to close, thus increasing unemployment, poverty and dependence. We don't need carbon tax either!
if you have a real renewable energy system it must have solar, wind, and Natural gas with some capacitance. This allows 24/7 power on demand, and not unstable solar and wind only. By having a tax on carbon you lower the introduction of this three in one technology and greatly SLOW the installation of solar and wind that runs when it can, and is backed up by gas. Once again, government does not see a viable solution and hinders progress. Wake up. Let those who know solve this problem...
If you put a price on carbon, then market mechanisms will take care of the rest. It's a genius free-market solution to the problem. Companies and individuals will be compelled to save energy, use energy more efficiently, innovate, etc.
Humans keep on coming!! so what ever you enviro freaks don't seem to get, is it's not just carbon but everything material. You can Make a magic car that runs with no emissions soon every one in the world will have one . The catch is, we keep growing by 7% per year . Soon all you silly Earthlings will go the way of dino. And no Damn Politician is going to change it.
Sadly, nature has it's own ways of maintaining population. we have so far been able to elude drought and famine due to increases in technology, but a large population is a breeding ground for pathogens. Eventually, we will outgrow this planet, unless the communists get their way and decrease the population. Also, humans do not cause global warming. Co2 does not increase temperature, temperature increases co2 concentration. There is no reason to reduce "green house" gases.
maybe some people want to make our country more efficient, think about it when you turn on your lights in the middle of the day, do you really need to waste that energy. Did we forget what happen 1952 in london Dec 6-9 ? over 3000 people died because the coal mixed with fog and formed a chemical blanket over the city.
You are so right, But I would go one step further. These enviro- Nazi Commies are exactly that, their anticapitalist and don't like human progress or humans in general. Human created global warming is a lie and the biggest and best scam ever created.
Biggest scam ever created? Enviro nazi commies? That is the biggest oxy-moron I have ever seen...lol
A sensible carbon tax coupled with a Cap and Trade system is not anti-capitalist. In fact its quite the opposite. It allows market forces to control fate with a rule book in place (ie caps on emissions)
It is patently obvious that you didn't listen to the man. He sounds like he knows what he's talking about, and he's definitely not smug or dismissive. He is, instead, thoughtful and well-spoken. Listen to his message rather than dissing something you clearly don't understand.
I did "listen to the man," and it was painful to do so. I didnt comment on the substance of his speech, which raises legitimate issues, but on his delivery, which undercuts any legitimacy he might have to pursuade others that a carbon tax is preferable over a cap-and-trade. Instead of delivering an objective speech on the pros and cons of a carbon tax, he just sounds like he's got an axe to grind. Fact of the matter is, the guy is a horrible speaker.
If we followed the US Constitution, "equal protection" would mean something. But the unelected fourth branch of government -- the immense, unaccountable federal bureaucracies -- like the EPA, doesn't give a damn what you, congress, nor I think -- what's fair -- or whether the Constitution authorizes its existence. Which is something to think about long and hard in 2012. It's all about money. You want the EPA deciding where America's money goes? EPA fees/fines are taxation without representation.
English is my first language. Maybe it's the accent, but this man is speaking so quickly that I have difficulty understanding him. Do other people have difficulty understanding people who talk very quickly, or is it just me??
lukeyboy123able 6 months ago
Why would it be a bad thing that certain constituencies argue for a lower cap? I mean if it leads to reduction in GHG, why does the intention of constituencies matter?
ninitinka 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The science is settled on carbon polution,Please watch this - Lord Christopher Monckton Speaking in St. Paul just copy and paste it in search box.
2wheels88 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
There is an alternative to the carbon tax and it will reduce emissions, create tens of thousands of jobs and result in a weekly power bill of only $8 per week. Don't believe me? watch?v=qImNRuV4G0Q
uknowispeaksense 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hate the wealthy? Give to the less fortunate? "Even the playing field" ?
Here are average yearly incomes of several countries:
Brazil $8,135
Venezuela $11,444
India $1,054
China $3,212
USA $45,835
To even the playing field, we must "de-develop the USA" , redistribute the wealth globally (take your income) vis cap and trade and other measures. How does socialism look to you now? It's not taking money from the wealthy -- it's taking your money!
vechorik 1 year ago
Look at this guy's lips. Someone please feed this guy before he shits in his pants.
clockhound65 1 year ago
You all heard that he likes the carbon tax, right (at least compared to cap and trade)? You see, educated conservatives like this guy can't allow themselves to pretend like we have unlimited fossil fuels. The rest of you people just don't want to believe that (1) we're destroying our environment and (2) we're becoming ever more dependent on the Middle East for our existence. If you hate reason (1), then at least recognize reason (2).
the1yage 1 year ago
CO2 is a natural gas necessary for life on earth therefore stop calling it a pollutant
IneedTodisco 1 year ago
@IneedTodisco CO2 in a natural cycle isn't a pollutant. The additional CO2 that has been locked away in a hydrocarbon form and is reintroduced into the atmosphere is a pollutant. Semantics maybe, but it's true.
pbryn1983 10 months ago
The Green Movements been infiltrated with profiteers,
Cap and Trade is yet another scheme meant to enrich a select few, Al Gore WAS well off, but today he's a multi-millionaire!
Get this, the average American household uses 10,656 kilowatt-hours a year, The Gore household sucks-up 221,000 or 20 times the national average,
can you say "SUCKERS"
uzijohn 1 year ago
its the same godam thing
lies on lies dont make truths
happysplinters 1 year ago
For a great expose of the Cap & Trade, which Gore & his Goldman Sachs shysters are set up to cash in on
Input youtube
"The Huge Mistake Climate Change Solutions 2009"
Help stop the Carbon tax fraud, call your Government Rep & say "NO" to Cap & Trade!
INFORMATIONLIBERATION(dot)com
Thisawareness 2 years ago
@Thisawareness
Cap and Trade legislation now known as the American Power Act, would have increased taxes on the average household between $1600-$3200. It would have increased gas prices up to $2.58 a gallon. With Obama demanding the cessation of offshore drilling gas prices are expected to increase yet another $5 a gallon, because we would grow dependent upon foreign nations we are not allies with in order to provide our oil. They would invariably price gouge to$10 a gallon gas!
Twilightifyable 1 year ago
@Twilightifyable Great post, check my page links friend, you'll like!
Thisawareness 1 year ago
...scientifical bullshit.
ikrug 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The more radical wing of the new Gaia religion is planning to turn upon its creators and is calling for the sacrifice of our Illuminati Gods to prevent catastrophic earth changes.
Al Gore will be sacrificed along with Kissinger, the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Bilderbergers and some royals for good measure.
Their reasoning is that it is far more appropriate for our Gods to put their lives on the line to save us instead of acting like criminals and stealing our money.
Also Lucifer DEMANDS it!
HenryRage 2 years ago
Americans must die....the fact is America is loaded with more dumb shits per capita than any other country in the world.
Name another Nation with such talent and resources that is so focused on the preservation of a Plutocratic System.
Stupid Fucking Americans...
satanrunspalin 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Also check out 'Climate Chains' on youtube.
It is a compelling video version of why cap and trade is horrible.
danchad79 2 years ago
Obama is a socialist
1Conservador 2 years ago
Yah, if you believe in the one drop rule.
TheClassicalLiberal 2 years ago
@1Conservador so what?
nbdcjj 2 years ago
so what?
nbdcjj 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Man, I really wish this guy knew what he was doing...
DarthCheney420 2 years ago
"Will it raise the price of goods and services? Yes, that's the point".
Why is that a good thing? What are they trying to do, reduce the US to a third-world nation? That's what we're becoming.
How is more expensive energy, goods and services a good thing? It will just make our standard of living lower, oh, but the earth will be pretty! That's a bunch of crap!
Check out NASA's latest findings on the solar cycle. Global Climate Change (caused by humans) is a hoax.
SugarMonkey528 2 years ago 4
"How is more expensive energy, goods and services a good thing?"
It internalises the externality and does not cost anything on average(it's 100% dividend).
Stop whining, build less filthy coal plants and more nuclear plants.
soylentgreenb 2 years ago
Google "Enron cap and trade"
Remember Enron America???
KARStarla 2 years ago 2
Fraud??? -Perfect for this Administration
lenny380 2 years ago 2
I would like to declare June 27 as burn a tire day!
yammyspeed13 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The Carbon Tax is NECESSARY in order to fight global warming more efficiently,why can't you see that?
hoyteno 2 years ago
the sun is getting hotter. i guess the sun is being effected by global warming too... D: oh noes!
RoyalDemonforChrist 2 years ago
cause we'll be "such a better planet" when most of our country is unemployed and have no home to live in... Unemployment is at it's highest since the Great Depression, the currency value is falling, people are losing their homes as it is, and we are trillions in debt. Aside from the fraud of this and the notion of "taxing air", we simply cannot support this bill period.
It is not the job of Congress to "create jobs". Mercury and Venus are getting warmer and they have NO life form.
ikill4klondikebars 2 years ago
I have yet to see the g'ment bring rain in a drought, or stop the rain during a flood. But now we think the g'ment can not only control the weather but the climate of the entire planet!
This is just a huge tax to be paid by every man, woman and child in the US to force them to live according to the environmentalists views. It's unconstitutional and unAmerican.
How can you not see that?
SugarMonkey528 2 years ago
We don't need ANY more taxes! Taxes are killing our companies and destroying our future! Cap and Trade "would be the equivalent of an atomic bomb directed at the U.S. economy, all without any scientific justification," says famed climatologist Dr. S. Fred Singer. It would significantly increase taxes and the cost of energy, forcing many companies to close, thus increasing unemployment, poverty and dependence. We don't need carbon tax either!
Antonio33s 2 years ago 2
if you have a real renewable energy system it must have solar, wind, and Natural gas with some capacitance. This allows 24/7 power on demand, and not unstable solar and wind only. By having a tax on carbon you lower the introduction of this three in one technology and greatly SLOW the installation of solar and wind that runs when it can, and is backed up by gas. Once again, government does not see a viable solution and hinders progress. Wake up. Let those who know solve this problem...
seaplaneguy1 2 years ago
fuck cap and trade and fuck carbon tax, how about that Kenneth Green? You fucking asshole.
FireGuyX 2 years ago
jesus christ...this guy is an idiot
shiznaw 2 years ago
The bludy foucker didnt say a word about subsidies to free energy sources power plants.
zyxrationalist 3 years ago
If you put a price on carbon, then market mechanisms will take care of the rest. It's a genius free-market solution to the problem. Companies and individuals will be compelled to save energy, use energy more efficiently, innovate, etc.
flamesforfun 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
24-F-NY-single - MSG me on M.S.N. ID is in my profile.
im hrny =X. if ne1 wants 2 chat just msg me. my M.S.Ngr id is in profile. hB
LOVERBOYKELL 3 years ago
Excellent video, thanks!
canadianvoter 3 years ago
good job every buddie.
we got fat people like al gore telling us that we need to pay for air.
zerogod420 3 years ago
strong arguement for Carbon Tax, any ideas on which way this will go (i.e will go, not should go)? Was the SO2 scheme dropped because of volatility?
kuhan1870 3 years ago
Humans keep on coming!! so what ever you enviro freaks don't seem to get, is it's not just carbon but everything material. You can Make a magic car that runs with no emissions soon every one in the world will have one . The catch is, we keep growing by 7% per year . Soon all you silly Earthlings will go the way of dino. And no Damn Politician is going to change it.
seventy18 3 years ago
Actually recently predictions have stated that the world's population will start to peak at around 9 billion...
We have to live a more sustainable lifestyle. That wil not happen overnight but Mr Dion's Green Shift plan is certainly a great step forward.
nickgibson1 3 years ago
Sadly, nature has it's own ways of maintaining population. we have so far been able to elude drought and famine due to increases in technology, but a large population is a breeding ground for pathogens. Eventually, we will outgrow this planet, unless the communists get their way and decrease the population. Also, humans do not cause global warming. Co2 does not increase temperature, temperature increases co2 concentration. There is no reason to reduce "green house" gases.
enomarekim 3 years ago
scam tax, its social engineering 101
gizmosells 3 years ago 2
maybe some people want to make our country more efficient, think about it when you turn on your lights in the middle of the day, do you really need to waste that energy. Did we forget what happen 1952 in london Dec 6-9 ? over 3000 people died because the coal mixed with fog and formed a chemical blanket over the city.
b4oh 3 years ago
If we allow the crazies in the so-called environmental movement (it's a religion) to doom our economy we are gutless fools.
accemekun 3 years ago 2
You are so right, But I would go one step further. These enviro- Nazi Commies are exactly that, their anticapitalist and don't like human progress or humans in general. Human created global warming is a lie and the biggest and best scam ever created.
electricalcomplex 3 years ago
Biggest scam ever created? Enviro nazi commies? That is the biggest oxy-moron I have ever seen...lol
A sensible carbon tax coupled with a Cap and Trade system is not anti-capitalist. In fact its quite the opposite. It allows market forces to control fate with a rule book in place (ie caps on emissions)
nickgibson1 3 years ago
too late, the current US administration has already done this for you. The Green movement is the only hope the economy has!
daniel1206 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
god this guy is a terrible speaker. why did they allow this smug, dismissive clown to speak on behalf of anyone, let alone AEI.
snoopbloggyblog 3 years ago
It is patently obvious that you didn't listen to the man. He sounds like he knows what he's talking about, and he's definitely not smug or dismissive. He is, instead, thoughtful and well-spoken. Listen to his message rather than dissing something you clearly don't understand.
solificon2 3 years ago 3
I did "listen to the man," and it was painful to do so. I didnt comment on the substance of his speech, which raises legitimate issues, but on his delivery, which undercuts any legitimacy he might have to pursuade others that a carbon tax is preferable over a cap-and-trade. Instead of delivering an objective speech on the pros and cons of a carbon tax, he just sounds like he's got an axe to grind. Fact of the matter is, the guy is a horrible speaker.
snoopbloggyblog 3 years ago
If it was painful for you to listen to this man I suggest you lack basic communication skills and the ability to understand the spoken word.
accemekun 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If we followed the US Constitution, "equal protection" would mean something. But the unelected fourth branch of government -- the immense, unaccountable federal bureaucracies -- like the EPA, doesn't give a damn what you, congress, nor I think -- what's fair -- or whether the Constitution authorizes its existence. Which is something to think about long and hard in 2012. It's all about money. You want the EPA deciding where America's money goes? EPA fees/fines are taxation without representation.
vechorik 5 months ago in playlist Cap and Tax Travesty