There comes a time, when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick at heart, that you can't part, not even passively take part, and you've got to put your bodies upon the gears, upon the levers, upon all the apparatus, and you've got to make it stop.
Goes for the warmongering dupes, AND you 9/11 Liars....
In my dream, the Plaza is packed, people in every direction as far as the eye can see. All highways into Dallas are clogged with cars, and millions of people have left them, now walking to Dealy with JFK & 911 signs to be there for the Nov. 22, 50 year shakeup. The whole world watches in awe, as now, all roads into Texas are parking lots..
and then a chemtrail tanker fleet doses them with vallium and prozac....
JUST FYI, THE USER KNOWN AS cantonear1968 IS A KNOWN SHILL. HE'S ON THESE 9/11 PAGES SPREADING DISINFORMATION ABOUT THE EVENTS OF 9/11/01. LIKE OTHER SHILLS HE CLAIMS TO BE AN "EXPERT", IN THIS CASE A FORMER "NAVIGATOR" FOR THE AIR FORCE. HE IS 100% FULL OF CRAP & CAN'T BE TAKEN AT HIS WORD. HE IS NOTHING MORE THAN A DISINFORMATION PUSHER. HE WILL ATTEMPT TO DISCREDIT ANY RESEARCH & RESEARCHERS NOT IN SUPPORT OF THE OFFICIAL STORY & WILL ATTEMPT TO DISCREDIT THE TRUTH MOVEMENT AS A WHOLE.
757 and 767 are capable to fly over 500 mph at sea level. Period. Their engines are that powerful. The wings and the fuselage will start to get damages if the jet plane flies like 450-500 mps at low altitudes but it doesnt happen immediatelly. If the pilot would've set the plane to dive at full throttle then the plane mostlikely would've been teared apart b4 getting even close to the tower.
I WOULD LIKE TO SAY MY SON RYAN KYLE OWENS IS PAID TO MAKE THESE VIDEOS AND POST THEM ON YOUTUBE
Just wondering if this story is real. Never seen you post a comment anywhere to respond to this post, or any other. Would you kindy direct me where I can glean wisdom from your immeasurable mind? In your vast library of 6 fav's & 61 loads of lard I saw no dynamic dialogue or deep diagnosis from one so learned in all aspects of just who harbours the pearls of knowledge about the new Pearl Harbor.
@cptfunkstar He was typing it as if it was spoken with a lisp... to further the insult. He does know how truther is spelled but many choose to spell it this way as a means of demonstrating exactly how "seriously" they take you. Which is not very seriously at all obviously, and for good reason.
Aluminum airplanes cannot slice through structural steel and concrete as if it were paper mache. Secondly, your claim of 490 MPH and 590 MPH is totally laughable. It's physically impossible for those planes to travel at those speeds at sea level.
The maximum speed for those aircraft at sea level would max out at about 330-350 MPH, so the entire story is a fairytale for children and those who know nothing about aircraft.
@GuyNAustin lol Max speed of 330-350 MPH at sea level? Where do you get that idea?
They didn't slice through like paper mache. The exterior walls weren't all that strong & the main structure was deep inside the building which tore the jet to ribbons.
@GuyNAustin so your saying they fly faster higher up with thinner air? ... oh dear oh dear you lack of basic understanding is pretty telling. Yes as you probably realise less air resistance the high you go = faster potential, but when your that high the thrust also loses air to push against so they must work harder to maintain speed.
Not to mention be quite. You do as much damage to civilisation as religious nuts ... grrrr just watch something that ISNT Zeitgeist ... please!
@GuyNAustin so the entire story is a fairytale for children and those who know nothing about aircraft.
Really? In 1945 a B25 flew thru the side of the Empire State Building. It accomplished this at 1/10th the mass of a 767. The ESB is a cement, columned fortress in comparison to the WTC which though large is a very lightly built structure and about 90% simply ... AIR.
A 767 is 10x heavier, moving 3x faster. We are talking 100s of times the force.
@GuyNAustin The maximum speed for those aircraft at sea level would max out at about 330-350 MPH, so the entire story is a fairytale for children and those who know nothing about aircraft.
Friend of mine flies a 767. 30 year veteran. I asked him this question. His reply...
"The altitude has no bearing on the engine performance, i could fly the plane at full speed at 100 feet i wanted. The plane is very capable of those speeds"..
Well done that man....you must be the CIA's prize student for coming up with that! Shame the real world can see through your bullshit eh...never mind, you might still get an A+ for your efforts anyway....from the CIA that is!
@cptfunkstar A deer ran out in front of me as I was driving home the other night. I think the CIA used mind control to make it run out at the exact time I was driving by. I braked and didn't hit it so I think they're going to come after me again. They're toying with me man. The other day I burned my toast because my buddy called while I was making it and I forgot about the toast. But now that I think about it. It had to be the CIA using an artificial recording of his voice to get me distracted.
@basketballplayer182 Maybe that would be the case if the CIA thought that a deer and your toast burning would be an excuse for a War somewhere, but somehow, I think they have bigger fish to fry!!
@cptfunkstar when you say "the real world" I take it you are not referring to the BBC, CNN, Reuters, and every other reputable news organisation....along with every reputable scientific and engineering journal in existence...the Encyclopedia Britannica, historians at every major university in the world, and so on...
Face the facts - you Twuthers have zero credibility, except amongst yourselves (although even then you all can't decide whether they were military planes or holograms).
@richard20bris They're all on glue. I have lost count (Seriously) to how many times i enter in to debate with these whackadoos, go to check out their home page, and 9 times out of 10 it will have some loony "Manifesto" statement on the world and their completely paranoid view of it. I mean how many people join Youtube and put in their description a 4 paragraph statement on Sept 11th or conspiracies. ?? Its more than a little "ODD".
How many think that the planes fired missiles before crashing? We're more likely talking parts per million than percentage here. While at it, why not debunk that Larry Silverstein turned into the Incredible Green Midget and tore up the core columns.
I say "DEBUNKED" Debunked!!!! look at the plane wing angles....not the same plane!!!! DUH!! Whoever this is, go post your video to non-intelligent people....it's not workin here!!!!
@trainbobber03 wow people will never admitt when they are wrong im not gunna tell you how to find out that its the same exact plane cuz im sure youd come up with another bs excuse
Nothing suspicious about anything here friends. Our system wouldn't create a horror of shocking awe against the finacial and military sector on live TV to trick us into anything nefarious, like waging wars abroad and against their own citenzens back home, would they?
But you also cut the video at 00:15 so it shows what you want it to show. Why don't you show the whole thing before you try and make people believe you. Be honest and show the truth, because thats where the answers are.
Well your looking at these videos and seeing exactly what you want to. If you look at segment starting at 00:15 you will notice that the flash occurs before the shadow meets the plane. AT those speeds as you say it was traveling as fast as a .45. That would mean that the blast or FLASH happened hundreds of feet before the impact even happened. If you can still see sun to the right that means there is space between the building and plane.
My charge is rather more prosaic; How on earth could an attack of the magnitude of 9/11 be dreamed up and subsequently executed without the slightest whiff of whistle blowing or promulgation. With the ease of the internet, text messaging etc, any person with a conscience could anonymously disclose details, blue prints, important data on the background of the plan. Why have we not seen anything, similar to the 'Wiki Leaks' event yet...'Watergate' anyone??
For the dumb ass that made this film WTF is this film proving? when you can show me a plane hit the pentagon then start this debunking shite go suck obamas dick you bell end
Mr. Newton would've something to say. Im sure he would think that something doesnt make sense. Like how collapsing accelerated, eventho mr. Newton has prooved that acceleration is possible only when there's empty space under the falling object. Another funny thing. The tip of the tower tilted many degrees. That means the kinetic energy and the weight moved partially away from the tower. Still the collapsing accelerated, still the tower pulverized all the way down. Interesting indeed.
@Scumbot404 "eventho mr. Newton has prooved that acceleration is possible only when there's empty space under the falling object."
Wow, do YOU need a physics lesson!
You have it completely wrong. Ever hear of F=MA? You do not need "empty space"; all you need is NET FORCE. If the WEIGHT of the falling mass exceeds the structure's resistive force, there will be acceleration. It might be less than gravity - as with the towers, for example - but you WILL have acceleration.
Tell me bout that missile. Im curious to kno what kind of missile causes relatively slow explosion. Did they remove the normal explosive material and replaced it with flammable fluids or similar stuff? Normally missile causes 1000x faster and sharper explosion. That flash just b4 the impact indeed is interesting, but still I dont believe in missile theory. RC theory is more belieavable.
And to ur point about CCTV. Such an elaborate scheme to fool the entire nation into thinking terrorists did this wouldn't have the ability to "photoshop" a clearly visible jet crashing into the pentagon.? Really? It's so preposterous. I know high school students who could do that.
Bottom line, many saw a commercial jet and even identified its company.
@wyrd. The most highly guarded bldg had as many as 43 witness and attest that a commercial jet hit the bldg. some went so far as to identfy it as a united jet. further the pent had numerous military personal assist in rescue and recovery. They surely reported seeing commercial jet debris ( there are photos of it).
By the way my question has always been if the conspirators wanted people to think a jet hit the pent (and crashed in PA) why wouldn't they just crash a jet into the pent? Why risk
Bullshit alert. I don't believe for one minute that 'missiles' were fired from those aircraft, or that the twin towers were brought down by (conventional) controlled demolition. However, I don't buy the US governments version either. But I might if they could answer just 3 questions straight out;
1. Were is the CCTV footage of a plane hitting the Pentagon, the most highly guarded building on earth?
2. WTF happened to WTC 7??
3. How did a plane hit the pentagon without hitting the ground first?
@wyrd9121 "Were is the CCTV footage of a plane hitting the Pentagon, ?"
- Only one camera caught the plane and the collision but the frames aren't very clear. How many cameras should you point at a wall?
"the most highly guarded building on earth" - lol you could do tours of the place back then so I doubt that claim is even close to true. Regardless a security guard with a gun is going to do little to stop a plane hitting the building.
@wyrd9121 1. and the other recordings from several cameras. 2. Hard to believe that precicely timed damages on every critical points of the construcion means controlled demolition? Is there other possibilities that building suddenly shows the classical finger print of c.d. by coinsidence? Debrises and fire cause random damages here n there and that cause randomly happened collapsing + some parts mostlikely would've stayed up. 3. What plane? Something flew toward the wall but what. i dunno.
I don't know who you are that edited this film and put this fucking stupid 1920 Happy Happy Saloon Music on. I couldn't even finish watching it. You are a sick fucker for making this process of piontless sudden impact smoke, sound and be real funny,you think it funny don't you? ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING!!!! You are the one who needs to jump off a tower!! SLIME BUCKET!!
Steel wrapped in concrete doesn't bend nor does it heat up the same as bare steel. Alternative destuction methods are available besides c4 explosives. And if you search for it, the 2nd tower had a sizeable fireball forced outward and upwind on not only the level of collapse but also above and below. Fire has never resulted in a steel structures failure before. The rationalization that fire and the impact is also irrational. Fire goes up not down. The upper few levels would have fallen.
There is too much evidence disproving this ridiculous conspiracies.
1. No explosions can be detected prior to the collapses in any videos, yet when you watch demolition videos there are extremely loud bangs (where people wear ear muffs).
2. Phone calls from planes
3. Eye witnesses absolutely everywhere
4. Steels doesnt need to melt to bring the tower down, yet only to bend. If the frameworks bend it will collapse because its not strong enough.
@hurro67 do me a favor try and make a cell phone call from a plane when its even 100 feet above the ground, it WON"T WORK, i tried, just try it next time you fly when ur on final approach, why do you think they have spent millions on signal boosters so we can NOW start to make calls on some flights
@hurro67 Ok time to give you a lesson in common sense. The towers were fine a couple of floors below the fire it would of bin strong enough to stop the buildings from falling at free fall speed. No video of plane hitting pentagon just a misile, most protected building in world and thats the only video they can show us. professional pilot said it would of took him atleast 3 attemps at hitting that building, but a cave monkey can do it in one,
@carpercarl83 "stop the buildings from falling at free fall speed." - They didn't fall at free fall. Have you done any real research at all on this topic?
"professional pilot said it would of took him atleast 3 attemps at hitting that building" - so a pilot can land a plane but can't hit a building? Nonsense...
Many pilots have said it wouldn't be that hard at all...
@markh1011 DUE TO THE LOW HIGHT OF THE BUILDING YES IT WOULD OF TOOK A FEW ATTEMPS DICK HEAD, AND ARE THEY PILOTS WHO ARE A MEMBER OF THE CIA? YOU WILL BELIEVE ENYTHING, AND THEY ALL FELL AT THE SAME FREE FALL SPEED. AND TO AND YES IVE SEEN A DOCUMENTARY ON TV THAT SHOWS EVERY MISTAKE THEM SLOPPY BASTARDS MADE.
@markh1011 THE PLANES WENT INSIDE THE BUILDINGS AND EXSPLODED HOW COULD A PIECE OF PAPER SURVIVE A FIRE. YOU WILL BELIEVE ENYTHING THEY TELL YOU SILLY MAN. HOW COULD BUILDING SEVEN BE SO WEEK IF IT WAS MADE WITH STEEL AND CONGRETE? HOW DID THIS SO CALLED CHAIR SURVIVE AND THE BLACK BOX NEVER? IF YOUR GOVERMENT WAS TELLING THE TRUTH THEN WHY DOESNT IT SHOW ONE OF MANY TAPES THE FBI CONVERSCATED BECAUSE THAT WOULD SHUT US ALL UP. I WILL TELL YOU WHY BECAUSE IT WASNT A PLANE
@carpercarl83 "HOW COULD A PIECE OF PAPER SURVIVE A FIRE" - It was ejected in the collision or subsequent explosion. It did not experience the hottest fires..
"HOW COULD BUILDING SEVEN BE SO WEEK IF IT WAS MADE WITH STEEL AND CONGRETE?" - Perhaps you could ask the NYFD... maybe you think you know better than they did.
"HOW DID THIS SO CALLED CHAIR SURVIVE" - ??? what?
" FBI CONVERSCATED BECAUSE" - The contents of those tapes was detailed. Only one caught the plane.
@markh1011 well it wasnt a sky skraper was it the pentagon is not a tall building, so yes it would be hard for a cave monkey who only has a license for a single enginge airplane, and why would an x american air pilot go on tv and say what i have said to you. Im not making this shit up its what ive bin researching for a while and ive also seen a full documentary on tv, YOUR FULL OF SHIT DONT YOU UNDERSTAND THAT YOUR GOVERMENT CONTROL YOUR TV KNEWS AND KNEWS PAPERS YOUR BRAINWASHED
@carpercarl83 "ell it wasnt a sky skraper was it the pentagon is not a tall building,"
- So it's impossible to hit it? You're talking garbage.
"so yes it would be hard for a cave monkey who only has a license for a single enginge airplane," - He had a commercial pilots licence and trained for years for this mission.
" and why would an x american air pilot go on tv and say what i have said to you." - Perhaps he's an idiot who knows... other pilots disagree anyway.
@carpercarl83 "what ive bin researching for a while " - Yet you think the buildings all fell at free fall. That's the most basic mistake. You don't seem to have a clue about the subject.
@carpercarl83 "THEY ALL FELL AT THE SAME FREE FALL SPEED" - Actually no this idiotic claim was debunked many years ago when someone pointed out to the truthers that the debris could be seen falling faster than the building.. so no... not free fall.
"YES IVE SEEN A DOCUMENTARY ON TV" - Well I guess you've done all the research you need to do then...
@markh1011 JUST THINK ABOUT IT NUM NUTS MOST OF THE HI JACKERS ARE ALIVE AND WELL...... PLEASE SOMEONE TRY TO TEACH THIS GUY SOME COMMON SENSE HE DOESNT NO HIS HEAD FROM HIS ASS
@carpercarl83 " PLEASE SOMEONE TRY TO TEACH THIS GUY" - Perhaps someone could instruct you on how to use a keyboard properly.
"HI JACKERS ARE ALIVE AND WELL"
- lol yeah the all powerful NWO killed thousands of people and blamed people who are still walking around.. just hoping no one noticed...great theory.
Actually your whole claim comes from a BBC article which was caused by mistaken identity.
@markh1011 BULLSHIT AND KNOW YOUR STRUCKLING FOR WORDS YOU HAVE TO TRY TO DISRESPECT ME BY CALLING MY TYPEING, AND KNOW MY COUNTRYS KNEWS IS WRONG HAHAHA FUNNY SHIT, WHATS UP ARE YOU RUNNING OUT OF AMMO OR SOMETHING? WHATS UP? IS IT BECAUSE YOU CANT ACCEPT THAT YOUR OWN GOVERMENT THINKS SO LITTLE OF YOU?
@hurro67 am not finished yet bitch, the black box with onboard video of what happened on board was destroyed, never as a plane crash ever done that the black box always survives. yet passports of the terrorist some how did. wonder were them cave monkeys got fireproof passports from? and bbc knews said that buiding7 callapsed 20 mins before it did. Need i go on?
@markh1011 you are stupid, just seen your channel and its a load of shite. ok smart ass so the passports was ejected before the fires and the building callapse???? so what your saying is that the hi jackers all frue ther passports out the window before the plane crashed, because them planes went inside the buildings when they hit, so i dont fink so you work for youtube or something??? your videos just chat shit about the towers what about building number 7?
@carpercarl83 "so what your saying is that the hi jackers all frue ther passports out the window" - What an poor attempt at a straw man. Do you realise that a airline seat cushion was also found on the sidewalk. If that could survive then surely a passport can.
"your videos just chat shit about the towers what about building number 7?"
- You mean the building the NYFD thought was going to collapse long before it did?
@markh1011 why did bbc knews say that building number 7 callapsed 20mins before it did? most watched building in the world and they cant show a plane hitting the pentagon? BULLSHIT and your making yourself look lkie a fool go suck obamas dick you thick brainwashed twat, and so what if i called them cave monkeys your saying they flew planes into your buildings so why do you care is it because your trying your hardest not to let people no the truth. FUCK OFF
@carpercarl83 "hy did bbc knews say that building number 7 callapsed 20mins before it did? " - Because it was expected to fall by the NYFD..due to loss of structural integrity. An easy mistake to make. There were several incorrect reports that day... that is just one of them.
"most watched building in the world" - lol where did you get that claim from? Truthers say some stupid things... The plane hit a wall... how many cameras do you put on a wall with nothing near it?
When you think about it, planes go about 600 mph ( not allowed over 700mph as it will break the sound barrier which they won't allow...) so it slicing a steel frame, is somewhat believably practical...
@WUDJABEABLE He's a retard you mean, he's showing you are picture of a monkay and a bird and claims it is the same thing. He should do an IQ and observation test.
@Xendrius they are same underneath. watch flight 175 as the world watched, phonecalls made to familes saying they are on a hijacked aircraft. Please explain that to me?
@WUDJABEABLE They are NOT the same, it has the shape of a 767, but it has a split running through its middle that no airliner in the world has, and it is fully grey. If you click on my channel you'll hear 11 witnesses saying it was no airliner but a military plane, and you'll see closeups aswell.
The calls,easiest thing in the world for the covert CIA to fake, they likely had their assets on the planes. Atta was a CIA asset 100%.
@WUDJABEABLE Flown to a military base never to be seen again, all we know that the people who should have been on the plane are gone, and there have been no signs of proof that these planes were used as weapons on 911, neither in the pentagon, ny or shanksville.
This wasn't planned over night, the conspirators had all bases covered. One thing they could have done better is to actually fake the flight manifests and put the hijacker names on the list as passengers.
@Xendrius haha listen to yourself man, thousounds and thousounds of people to be involved for that to happen. Passengers on united 93 said the hijackers were arab anyway. The manifests show the passengers and hijackers names on these flights, mark bingham, atta, al-shehhi, jarrah etc.
@WUDJABEABLE Not really, the CIA had hijack drills on 9/11 as a cover if anything should go wrong as they boarded the planes with their arab assets, check out the flight manifests, no arab names, and those who were listed, many of them military personell with top security clearences, a kid can see something fishy was going on and that it was a covert operation.
And no you moron in 2003 people actually checked the flight manifests and there were no arab names.
@Xendrius the WTC was bombed in 93, terrorist activity did rise around the world so 9/11 drills were pretty obvious, CIA got intel of all kinds of activity, hijackings etc. The names of the hijackers are on manifests now.
Then think of this. 1200 degrees is MORE than the Jet Fuel can burn. There were thermite sprinkled all over the building. Proof? The smoke is the proof. When thermite burns it releases hydrogen smoke. The building was SMOTHERED in smoke. And just incase some random noob says that there were gas lines. There were NO gas lines. The WTC were Class A Buildings meaning that there are no gas lines allowed.
A few 100 people are braingwashing TONS of people. Wake up. We can defeat them. WAKE UP!!!!!!!
On YT: "Jewish Ex-Marine Speaks out on Israeli Involvement" "The proven 9/11 Foreknowledge of Isarel's agents" "The Truth Israel did 9/11 Rothschild Zionist Control America" "Israeli Art students in WTC connected to 9/11" "Ex-US Marine 9/11 was a Mossad False Flag Op" "World Fears US as war hungry drunk - ex Senator" Google: "Isreal did 9/11 All the Proof in the world" "Solving 9/11 - The deception that changed the world" "Kevin Barret - Rediscover 9/11"
What you guys are forgetting is that the so-called "passenger flights" were actually Decepticons. They transformed after impact, wrecking everything inside the towers until they collapsed, then they escaped through the sewers
On YT: "Jewish Ex-Marine Speaks out on Israeli Involvement" "The proven 9/11 Foreknowledge of Isarel's agents" "The Truth Israel did 9/11 Rothschild Zionist Control America" "Israeli Art students in WTC connected to 9/11" "Ex-US Marine 9/11 was a Mossad False Flag Op" "World Fears US as war hungry drunk - ex Senator" Google: "Isreal did 9/11 All the Proof in the world" "Solving 9/11 - The deception that changed the world" "Kevin Barret - Rediscover 9/11"
Anyways, this video shows how much credibility the maker expected in the first second, when the retard music starts. 9/11 = complete lie. Bin Laden = super lie.
Answer this, all muslims are not terrorists obviously. So why hide a pic of OBL by saying some muslim groups would be pissed, but the gitmo army sex and torture pics were let out.. those angered all muslims, and many non muslims, but we didnt care then did we? lol.. 9/11 what a joke on the US this shit is.
ROTFL @ the pic of the jet on the lawn at the pentagon!!! priceless.. Why is things directly related to the story we used to enter the middle east are always shrouded in bullshit? The planes hit the towers, for sure.. which planes they actually were is debate worthy, but anyway. The feds confiscated every tape with a possible view of the Penta-gone hit, why? And not 1 single "dramatic footage captured by tourist low quality evening news" clip is to be found? yea that makes sense..
@the8jrfan I love how your deunking videos take some obscure theory and disprove it. Try looking at the video showing the extra tech on the bottom of the planes. I never saw any popular videos on theories of missles from the planes. All these debunk videos made me question the story even more. Try putting out some videos disproving the core questions.
@lijebaley01 I have. You should go look up the temperate and color ranges on fire, kerosene based fuel and it's flash point, nano thermite oxidizing compounds etc... I haven't seen any intelligent research from you except referencing quack science reports.
@buzzybeemarketing Ok, I'll pretend you know something, although you still haven't shown it. Tell me how, in Harrit's paper the conclusion of thermite can be drawn from heating a sample and first it burns a little, then it gives off a thermal expansion pop (sent a little shrapnel off). Thermite doesn't burn and if it was thermite, these would not be seperate occurrences. This actually proves it is NOT thermite.
@lijebaley01 a paper cant prove anything by itself, theremite was proven beyond a doubt to be present at the WTCs. The melted steel, the eutectic swiss cheese steel, the molten metal and the iron spheres all point to thermate or thermite being there.
@jasminhotel That's because they didn't want anyone seeing the extra tech attached to the bottom of the planes. It's remote control technology by Raytheon. A normal quality video would only make people ask more questions.
at 0:28 the plane has already hit but what RKOwens4 said about kinetic energy makes alot of sense and the two pertrusions on the under side is how ua used to paint the underside of their plains
funny how your attempts at debunking always fail miserably. funny how the explosion only happens at the tip of the plane if what you say is true, then the wings would have sparked too as they hit, but alas they did not, only the tip did, and heck the picture you showed, show us it happened even before impact (:28)
about flight 767 why is the one hitting the tower all black? explain that!
@mrevilmarsbar lol, even the clips in this video shows tail breaking off and creating sparks as it slows down, maybe you should try a little harder. explain why in the picture at 0:28 seconds. the explosion happens right before the plane touches the tower, so that picture don't help this videos attempts!
the truth is what everyone is told unless you dont beleave what you are told.i for one dont beleave the govts.story on what happeen on 911.you can ask and u can vote but you will never be told the truth never!the govt controls your news even fox everyone that beleaves bush had nothing to do with 911 and took us to a war far are safty is a sleep now obama is startin new wars wake up people.the past 10 years are govt. has been pulling the wool over are eye.i dont put nothing past are govt.of greed
It has been PROVEN BY NIST themselves that WTC7 WAS BLOWN UP. They tried to hide it in their preliminary report but were forced by David Chandler to in the final one admit to a 2,25 SECOND PERIOD OF FREE FALL. They then tried to divert attention from that by focusing on an average. Free fall, even for just a period, is possible ONLY through controlled demolition. 9/11 - INSIDE JOB.
@HurburBurbur The same thing could be said for both parties, a lot of people arent willing to accept that they are wrong so its always the other side thats not willing to admit it. Obvious debate tactics that dont accomplish anything other than "your wrong!" - "NO YOUR WRONGER AND CANT ADMIT IT!" lol
Well I agree it's the case for the less serious and there are plenty around. Those are not willing to check out alleged facts, follow evidence based research and investigate on their own. Those who don't do this falls back on rethorics. But it's a cold hard fact that WCT 7 indeed fell in freefall spead for 2,25 s in the area that was examined which were a mere 18 of 47 floors. NIST were forced to include it though they tried to hide it in their draft. I've read the reports.
@HurburBurbur Yes I agree, I just dont believe that the towers were blown up, theres just too much to cover up and much easier ways to go about things and I have a hard time believing that government officials are intelligently capable of hiding it. I do however agree to a point that they let it happen and took advantage of the event. Knowing what weve been doing to the people of the middle east for the last 50 years, Im surprised that we havnt been attacked more.
This has been flagged as spam show
RKO plainly maintains... "PLANEly Misses ExPLANEing"...inane...
There comes a time, when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick at heart, that you can't part, not even passively take part, and you've got to put your bodies upon the gears, upon the levers, upon all the apparatus, and you've got to make it stop.
Goes for the warmongering dupes, AND you 9/11 Liars....
Disdain4Lies 7 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
JAJAJAJAJAJAJAJA: 9/11 WAS A FRAUD:
Leslie Raphael, Serendipity.li
Inigo37 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
In my dream, the Plaza is packed, people in every direction as far as the eye can see. All highways into Dallas are clogged with cars, and millions of people have left them, now walking to Dealy with JFK & 911 signs to be there for the Nov. 22, 50 year shakeup. The whole world watches in awe, as now, all roads into Texas are parking lots..
and then a chemtrail tanker fleet doses them with vallium and prozac....
they forget why they came....
and go home & watch the "nooz
MrNoblemanoflove 5 days ago
well done, tho I thought the music was distracting from these very solemn images in parts.
HelFKiernan 5 days ago
explain the nanothermite and the blackboxes and then gain some respect.
Christianqcs 5 days ago
@Christianqcs Nonothermite wasn't found.
The black boxes were found for FLs 77 and 93, though the VDR for 77 was inoperable.
The black boxes were not found for FLs 11 and 175.
What else do you need explained?
cantonear1968 3 days ago
you wouldn't need a single missile to help that plan get into the tower. a 757 going 500 mph that has hundreds of fuel on board would do the trick
NO0Bstatus 1 week ago
yer All A bunch of fucktArds! whAt is the point of shooting A missle into A building thAt your flying A huge plAne into! there's no need for A missle!
good observAtion trAilergod
djsicizzum 1 week ago
fuck u thats all the proof you have
ali51999 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
JUST FYI, THE USER KNOWN AS cantonear1968 IS A KNOWN SHILL. HE'S ON THESE 9/11 PAGES SPREADING DISINFORMATION ABOUT THE EVENTS OF 9/11/01. LIKE OTHER SHILLS HE CLAIMS TO BE AN "EXPERT", IN THIS CASE A FORMER "NAVIGATOR" FOR THE AIR FORCE. HE IS 100% FULL OF CRAP & CAN'T BE TAKEN AT HIS WORD. HE IS NOTHING MORE THAN A DISINFORMATION PUSHER. HE WILL ATTEMPT TO DISCREDIT ANY RESEARCH & RESEARCHERS NOT IN SUPPORT OF THE OFFICIAL STORY & WILL ATTEMPT TO DISCREDIT THE TRUTH MOVEMENT AS A WHOLE.
mrh785 1 week ago 5
This has been flagged as spam show
757 and 767 are capable to fly over 500 mph at sea level. Period. Their engines are that powerful. The wings and the fuselage will start to get damages if the jet plane flies like 450-500 mps at low altitudes but it doesnt happen immediatelly. If the pilot would've set the plane to dive at full throttle then the plane mostlikely would've been teared apart b4 getting even close to the tower.
Scumbot404 1 week ago
Comment removed
Scumbot404 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I WOULD LIKE TO SAY MY SON RYAN KYLE OWENS IS PAID TO MAKE THESE VIDEOS AND POST THEM ON YOUTUBE
Just wondering if this story is real. Never seen you post a comment anywhere to respond to this post, or any other. Would you kindy direct me where I can glean wisdom from your immeasurable mind? In your vast library of 6 fav's & 61 loads of lard I saw no dynamic dialogue or deep diagnosis from one so learned in all aspects of just who harbours the pearls of knowledge about the new Pearl Harbor.
Disdain4Lies 1 week ago
Thank You!
kingindeed 1 week ago
What the fuck is a "Twuther"?? If your going to portray intellect......learn how to spell first!
cptfunkstar 2 weeks ago
@cptfunkstar He was typing it as if it was spoken with a lisp... to further the insult. He does know how truther is spelled but many choose to spell it this way as a means of demonstrating exactly how "seriously" they take you. Which is not very seriously at all obviously, and for good reason.
MrAwsome514 1 week ago
very nice
pocomedy 2 weeks ago
Aluminum airplanes cannot slice through structural steel and concrete as if it were paper mache. Secondly, your claim of 490 MPH and 590 MPH is totally laughable. It's physically impossible for those planes to travel at those speeds at sea level.
The maximum speed for those aircraft at sea level would max out at about 330-350 MPH, so the entire story is a fairytale for children and those who know nothing about aircraft.
GuyNAustin 2 weeks ago
@GuyNAustin lol Max speed of 330-350 MPH at sea level? Where do you get that idea?
They didn't slice through like paper mache. The exterior walls weren't all that strong & the main structure was deep inside the building which tore the jet to ribbons.
shananagans5 2 weeks ago
@shananagans5 Yaaaaaaay!! someone with a brain and some intelligence!!
roquefortfiles 2 weeks ago
@GuyNAustin
"Aluminum airplanes cannot slice through structural steel and concrete as if it were paper mache."
That's weird I never saw the plane exit intact out the other side. Building must have destroyed it.
That reminds me of an episode of MythBusters where they shot a regular drinking straw INTO a tree. Mythbusters must be part of the conspiracy.
ExposeTheTwooferCult 2 weeks ago
@GuyNAustin so your saying they fly faster higher up with thinner air? ... oh dear oh dear you lack of basic understanding is pretty telling. Yes as you probably realise less air resistance the high you go = faster potential, but when your that high the thrust also loses air to push against so they must work harder to maintain speed.
Not to mention be quite. You do as much damage to civilisation as religious nuts ... grrrr just watch something that ISNT Zeitgeist ... please!
Breezer1391 2 weeks ago
@GuyNAustin so the entire story is a fairytale for children and those who know nothing about aircraft.
Really? In 1945 a B25 flew thru the side of the Empire State Building. It accomplished this at 1/10th the mass of a 767. The ESB is a cement, columned fortress in comparison to the WTC which though large is a very lightly built structure and about 90% simply ... AIR.
A 767 is 10x heavier, moving 3x faster. We are talking 100s of times the force.
roquefortfiles 2 weeks ago
@GuyNAustin The maximum speed for those aircraft at sea level would max out at about 330-350 MPH, so the entire story is a fairytale for children and those who know nothing about aircraft.
Friend of mine flies a 767. 30 year veteran. I asked him this question. His reply...
"The altitude has no bearing on the engine performance, i could fly the plane at full speed at 100 feet i wanted. The plane is very capable of those speeds"..
You were saying???
roquefortfiles 2 weeks ago
Well done that man....you must be the CIA's prize student for coming up with that! Shame the real world can see through your bullshit eh...never mind, you might still get an A+ for your efforts anyway....from the CIA that is!
cptfunkstar 3 weeks ago
@cptfunkstar A deer ran out in front of me as I was driving home the other night. I think the CIA used mind control to make it run out at the exact time I was driving by. I braked and didn't hit it so I think they're going to come after me again. They're toying with me man. The other day I burned my toast because my buddy called while I was making it and I forgot about the toast. But now that I think about it. It had to be the CIA using an artificial recording of his voice to get me distracted.
basketballplayer182 2 weeks ago
@basketballplayer182 Maybe that would be the case if the CIA thought that a deer and your toast burning would be an excuse for a War somewhere, but somehow, I think they have bigger fish to fry!!
cptfunkstar 2 weeks ago
@cptfunkstar Maybe haha. We'll see what happens next in the world.
basketballplayer182 2 weeks ago
@cptfunkstar when you say "the real world" I take it you are not referring to the BBC, CNN, Reuters, and every other reputable news organisation....along with every reputable scientific and engineering journal in existence...the Encyclopedia Britannica, historians at every major university in the world, and so on...
Face the facts - you Twuthers have zero credibility, except amongst yourselves (although even then you all can't decide whether they were military planes or holograms).
richard20bris 2 weeks ago
@richard20bris They're all on glue. I have lost count (Seriously) to how many times i enter in to debate with these whackadoos, go to check out their home page, and 9 times out of 10 it will have some loony "Manifesto" statement on the world and their completely paranoid view of it. I mean how many people join Youtube and put in their description a 4 paragraph statement on Sept 11th or conspiracies. ?? Its more than a little "ODD".
YT manifesto?
Odd!!
roquefortfiles 2 weeks ago
How many think that the planes fired missiles before crashing? We're more likely talking parts per million than percentage here. While at it, why not debunk that Larry Silverstein turned into the Incredible Green Midget and tore up the core columns.
HurburBurbur 3 weeks ago
I say "DEBUNKED" Debunked!!!! look at the plane wing angles....not the same plane!!!! DUH!! Whoever this is, go post your video to non-intelligent people....it's not workin here!!!!
trainbobber03 3 weeks ago
@trainbobber03 wow people will never admitt when they are wrong im not gunna tell you how to find out that its the same exact plane cuz im sure youd come up with another bs excuse
SOCKEMBOPPERZ1 3 weeks ago
@trainbobber03
"Whoever this is, go post your video to non-intelligent people"
It's meant for non-intelligent people to easily understand. Apparantly you need it dumbed down even more.
ExposeTheTwooferCult 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
...
FOR THOSE WHO STILL DOUBT....SEE YT: (2012 BRAND NEW) DEMOLITION OF THE WTC TOWERS- WHAT WAS USED? (MUST SEE)...23MIN. 39 SEC.
MrNoblemanoflove 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nothing suspicious about anything here friends. Our system wouldn't create a horror of shocking awe against the finacial and military sector on live TV to trick us into anything nefarious, like waging wars abroad and against their own citenzens back home, would they?
Just a min. someones banging on the door...
be right baaaaaaaaahhhhh.....
-end of msg-
Disdain4Lies 4 weeks ago
But you also cut the video at 00:15 so it shows what you want it to show. Why don't you show the whole thing before you try and make people believe you. Be honest and show the truth, because thats where the answers are.
xXTrailerGODXx 4 weeks ago
Well your looking at these videos and seeing exactly what you want to. If you look at segment starting at 00:15 you will notice that the flash occurs before the shadow meets the plane. AT those speeds as you say it was traveling as fast as a .45. That would mean that the blast or FLASH happened hundreds of feet before the impact even happened. If you can still see sun to the right that means there is space between the building and plane.
xXTrailerGODXx 4 weeks ago
RKOwens4, I completely agree with you. But I am curious, do you believe that it was an inside job, or that it was perpetrated by terrorists?
ClaySPF 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
My charge is rather more prosaic; How on earth could an attack of the magnitude of 9/11 be dreamed up and subsequently executed without the slightest whiff of whistle blowing or promulgation. With the ease of the internet, text messaging etc, any person with a conscience could anonymously disclose details, blue prints, important data on the background of the plan. Why have we not seen anything, similar to the 'Wiki Leaks' event yet...'Watergate' anyone??
kentusmaximus 1 month ago
For the dumb ass that made this film WTF is this film proving? when you can show me a plane hit the pentagon then start this debunking shite go suck obamas dick you bell end
carpercarl83 1 month ago
Wrong paint job for the serial # search Boeing 767-200ER 911 and there is a photo of the actual plane.
kitethesnow 1 month ago
Mr. Newton would've something to say. Im sure he would think that something doesnt make sense. Like how collapsing accelerated, eventho mr. Newton has prooved that acceleration is possible only when there's empty space under the falling object. Another funny thing. The tip of the tower tilted many degrees. That means the kinetic energy and the weight moved partially away from the tower. Still the collapsing accelerated, still the tower pulverized all the way down. Interesting indeed.
Scumbot404 1 month ago
@Scumbot404 "eventho mr. Newton has prooved that acceleration is possible only when there's empty space under the falling object."
Wow, do YOU need a physics lesson!
You have it completely wrong. Ever hear of F=MA? You do not need "empty space"; all you need is NET FORCE. If the WEIGHT of the falling mass exceeds the structure's resistive force, there will be acceleration. It might be less than gravity - as with the towers, for example - but you WILL have acceleration.
TimReed22222 1 month ago
Tell me bout that missile. Im curious to kno what kind of missile causes relatively slow explosion. Did they remove the normal explosive material and replaced it with flammable fluids or similar stuff? Normally missile causes 1000x faster and sharper explosion. That flash just b4 the impact indeed is interesting, but still I dont believe in missile theory. RC theory is more belieavable.
Scumbot404 1 month ago
And to ur point about CCTV. Such an elaborate scheme to fool the entire nation into thinking terrorists did this wouldn't have the ability to "photoshop" a clearly visible jet crashing into the pentagon.? Really? It's so preposterous. I know high school students who could do that.
Bottom line, many saw a commercial jet and even identified its company.
Shamrock3939 1 month ago
@wyrd. The most highly guarded bldg had as many as 43 witness and attest that a commercial jet hit the bldg. some went so far as to identfy it as a united jet. further the pent had numerous military personal assist in rescue and recovery. They surely reported seeing commercial jet debris ( there are photos of it).
By the way my question has always been if the conspirators wanted people to think a jet hit the pent (and crashed in PA) why wouldn't they just crash a jet into the pent? Why risk
Shamrock3939 1 month ago
yeah its the air pressure in front of the plane hitting the building
9dilo 1 month ago
Bullshit alert. I don't believe for one minute that 'missiles' were fired from those aircraft, or that the twin towers were brought down by (conventional) controlled demolition. However, I don't buy the US governments version either. But I might if they could answer just 3 questions straight out;
1. Were is the CCTV footage of a plane hitting the Pentagon, the most highly guarded building on earth?
2. WTF happened to WTC 7??
3. How did a plane hit the pentagon without hitting the ground first?
wyrd9121 1 month ago
@wyrd9121
1)Already shown.
2)Hit by the North Tower.
3)It didn't have to hit the ground first.
DTD110865 1 month ago in playlist Trashing 9/11 Conspiracy Freaks
@wyrd9121 "Were is the CCTV footage of a plane hitting the Pentagon, ?"
- Only one camera caught the plane and the collision but the frames aren't very clear. How many cameras should you point at a wall?
"the most highly guarded building on earth" - lol you could do tours of the place back then so I doubt that claim is even close to true. Regardless a security guard with a gun is going to do little to stop a plane hitting the building.
markh1011 1 month ago
@wyrd9121 "WTF happened to WTC 7??"
- Fire cause the collapse. NIST released a report on it years ago. It would have been no surprise to the NYFD who thought the same thing on the day.
"How did a plane hit the pentagon without hitting the ground first?"- He did clip the ground with one of the wings.
markh1011 1 month ago
@wyrd9121 1. and the other recordings from several cameras. 2. Hard to believe that precicely timed damages on every critical points of the construcion means controlled demolition? Is there other possibilities that building suddenly shows the classical finger print of c.d. by coinsidence? Debrises and fire cause random damages here n there and that cause randomly happened collapsing + some parts mostlikely would've stayed up. 3. What plane? Something flew toward the wall but what. i dunno.
Scumbot404 1 month ago
You better look at Dr Judy Woods work.....it appears you know nothing at all....shame....
bmthman42 1 month ago
Next your be telling how a 124foot plane fitted in to a 16 foot hole....WAKE UP IDIOT....!!!!!!
bmthman42 1 month ago
@bmthman42 16 feet? I left a hole that spanned several floors
TheCrisisKings 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos
Lol....the nose cones are composite material...therefore would not cause flash....debunk that dumb ass.....LMAO
bmthman42 1 month ago
I don't know who you are that edited this film and put this fucking stupid 1920 Happy Happy Saloon Music on. I couldn't even finish watching it. You are a sick fucker for making this process of piontless sudden impact smoke, sound and be real funny,you think it funny don't you? ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING!!!! You are the one who needs to jump off a tower!! SLIME BUCKET!!
Jtrack7 1 month ago
@Jtrack7 Why are your panties in a knot over the music? He only used it to illustrate the buffonish idiocy of truther claims.
Is there anything in the video factually that you disagree with?
cantonear1968 1 month ago
this video is fucking pants believe what you like people, americas goverment is the next hitler
carpercarl83 1 month ago
If your plane is about to slam into a building, why fire a missile?? --- Nothing more needs to be added, apart from well done and thank you.
bigmaxy07 1 month ago
Steel wrapped in concrete doesn't bend nor does it heat up the same as bare steel. Alternative destuction methods are available besides c4 explosives. And if you search for it, the 2nd tower had a sizeable fireball forced outward and upwind on not only the level of collapse but also above and below. Fire has never resulted in a steel structures failure before. The rationalization that fire and the impact is also irrational. Fire goes up not down. The upper few levels would have fallen.
bassax13 1 month ago
Thank you for bringing sanity to youtube.
zimbabweking 1 month ago
9/11 was inside job,the airplane inside had gas and everyone died inside and then the pkane was taken over by ground control
1123359 1 month ago
@1123359-Sure it was. Now, you're going to show evidence of this...right?
dalek14mc 1 month ago
There is too much evidence disproving this ridiculous conspiracies.
1. No explosions can be detected prior to the collapses in any videos, yet when you watch demolition videos there are extremely loud bangs (where people wear ear muffs).
2. Phone calls from planes
3. Eye witnesses absolutely everywhere
4. Steels doesnt need to melt to bring the tower down, yet only to bend. If the frameworks bend it will collapse because its not strong enough.
......need i go on?
hurro67 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos
@hurro67 do me a favor try and make a cell phone call from a plane when its even 100 feet above the ground, it WON"T WORK, i tried, just try it next time you fly when ur on final approach, why do you think they have spent millions on signal boosters so we can NOW start to make calls on some flights
lilblitz 1 month ago
@hurro67 Ok time to give you a lesson in common sense. The towers were fine a couple of floors below the fire it would of bin strong enough to stop the buildings from falling at free fall speed. No video of plane hitting pentagon just a misile, most protected building in world and thats the only video they can show us. professional pilot said it would of took him atleast 3 attemps at hitting that building, but a cave monkey can do it in one,
carpercarl83 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@carpercarl83 "stop the buildings from falling at free fall speed." - They didn't fall at free fall. Have you done any real research at all on this topic?
"professional pilot said it would of took him atleast 3 attemps at hitting that building" - so a pilot can land a plane but can't hit a building? Nonsense...
Many pilots have said it wouldn't be that hard at all...
markh1011 1 month ago
@markh1011 DUE TO THE LOW HIGHT OF THE BUILDING YES IT WOULD OF TOOK A FEW ATTEMPS DICK HEAD, AND ARE THEY PILOTS WHO ARE A MEMBER OF THE CIA? YOU WILL BELIEVE ENYTHING, AND THEY ALL FELL AT THE SAME FREE FALL SPEED. AND TO AND YES IVE SEEN A DOCUMENTARY ON TV THAT SHOWS EVERY MISTAKE THEM SLOPPY BASTARDS MADE.
carpercarl83 1 month ago
@carpercarl83 "DUE TO THE LOW HIGHT OF THE BUILDING" - It was hardly a small building....
"WOULD OF TOOK A FEW ATTEMPS" - If that were the case why would they even try then? Clearly it wasn't the case and many pilots say so.
"ARE A MEMBER OF THE CIA" - No one of them are. I can give you a link to read for yourself if you like.
markh1011 1 month ago
@markh1011 THE PLANES WENT INSIDE THE BUILDINGS AND EXSPLODED HOW COULD A PIECE OF PAPER SURVIVE A FIRE. YOU WILL BELIEVE ENYTHING THEY TELL YOU SILLY MAN. HOW COULD BUILDING SEVEN BE SO WEEK IF IT WAS MADE WITH STEEL AND CONGRETE? HOW DID THIS SO CALLED CHAIR SURVIVE AND THE BLACK BOX NEVER? IF YOUR GOVERMENT WAS TELLING THE TRUTH THEN WHY DOESNT IT SHOW ONE OF MANY TAPES THE FBI CONVERSCATED BECAUSE THAT WOULD SHUT US ALL UP. I WILL TELL YOU WHY BECAUSE IT WASNT A PLANE
carpercarl83 1 month ago
@carpercarl83 "HOW COULD A PIECE OF PAPER SURVIVE A FIRE" - It was ejected in the collision or subsequent explosion. It did not experience the hottest fires..
"HOW COULD BUILDING SEVEN BE SO WEEK IF IT WAS MADE WITH STEEL AND CONGRETE?" - Perhaps you could ask the NYFD... maybe you think you know better than they did.
"HOW DID THIS SO CALLED CHAIR SURVIVE" - ??? what?
" FBI CONVERSCATED BECAUSE" - The contents of those tapes was detailed. Only one caught the plane.
markh1011 1 month ago
@carpercarl83 YOU SHOULD REALLY TURN YOUR CAPLOCK OFF
its official, you are a retard congrats!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
cottoniiijoe 1 month ago
@markh1011 well it wasnt a sky skraper was it the pentagon is not a tall building, so yes it would be hard for a cave monkey who only has a license for a single enginge airplane, and why would an x american air pilot go on tv and say what i have said to you. Im not making this shit up its what ive bin researching for a while and ive also seen a full documentary on tv, YOUR FULL OF SHIT DONT YOU UNDERSTAND THAT YOUR GOVERMENT CONTROL YOUR TV KNEWS AND KNEWS PAPERS YOUR BRAINWASHED
carpercarl83 1 month ago
@carpercarl83 "ell it wasnt a sky skraper was it the pentagon is not a tall building,"
- So it's impossible to hit it? You're talking garbage.
"so yes it would be hard for a cave monkey who only has a license for a single enginge airplane," - He had a commercial pilots licence and trained for years for this mission.
" and why would an x american air pilot go on tv and say what i have said to you." - Perhaps he's an idiot who knows... other pilots disagree anyway.
markh1011 1 month ago
@carpercarl83 "what ive bin researching for a while " - Yet you think the buildings all fell at free fall. That's the most basic mistake. You don't seem to have a clue about the subject.
" YOUR GOVERMENT " - Not mine.
markh1011 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@carpercarl83 "THEY ALL FELL AT THE SAME FREE FALL SPEED" - Actually no this idiotic claim was debunked many years ago when someone pointed out to the truthers that the debris could be seen falling faster than the building.. so no... not free fall.
"YES IVE SEEN A DOCUMENTARY ON TV" - Well I guess you've done all the research you need to do then...
markh1011 1 month ago
@markh1011 JUST THINK ABOUT IT NUM NUTS MOST OF THE HI JACKERS ARE ALIVE AND WELL...... PLEASE SOMEONE TRY TO TEACH THIS GUY SOME COMMON SENSE HE DOESNT NO HIS HEAD FROM HIS ASS
carpercarl83 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@carpercarl83 " PLEASE SOMEONE TRY TO TEACH THIS GUY" - Perhaps someone could instruct you on how to use a keyboard properly.
"HI JACKERS ARE ALIVE AND WELL"
- lol yeah the all powerful NWO killed thousands of people and blamed people who are still walking around.. just hoping no one noticed...great theory.
Actually your whole claim comes from a BBC article which was caused by mistaken identity.
markh1011 1 month ago
@markh1011 BULLSHIT AND KNOW YOUR STRUCKLING FOR WORDS YOU HAVE TO TRY TO DISRESPECT ME BY CALLING MY TYPEING, AND KNOW MY COUNTRYS KNEWS IS WRONG HAHAHA FUNNY SHIT, WHATS UP ARE YOU RUNNING OUT OF AMMO OR SOMETHING? WHATS UP? IS IT BECAUSE YOU CANT ACCEPT THAT YOUR OWN GOVERMENT THINKS SO LITTLE OF YOU?
carpercarl83 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@carpercarl83 "...AND KNOW YOUR STRUCKLING FOR WORDS "
- funny.
" ME BY CALLING MY TYPEING" - I don't care much about spelling mistakes but if you post all in upper case you appear like a ranting moron.
" IS IT BECAUSE YOU CANT ACCEPT THAT YOUR OWN GOVERMENT THINKS" - Not my government. I'm not American.
"AND WHY DID US IN THE UK NO THAT BUILDING 7 CALLAPSED 20MINS BEFORE IT DID"
- Probably because there was an incorrect report... are you going to produce a point at some stage?
markh1011 1 month ago
@markh1011 AND WHY DID US IN THE UK NO THAT BUILDING 7 CALLAPSED 20MINS BEFORE IT DID? BULLSHIT BULLLSHIT BULLSHIT
carpercarl83 1 month ago
@hurro67 am not finished yet bitch, the black box with onboard video of what happened on board was destroyed, never as a plane crash ever done that the black box always survives. yet passports of the terrorist some how did. wonder were them cave monkeys got fireproof passports from? and bbc knews said that buiding7 callapsed 20 mins before it did. Need i go on?
carpercarl83 1 month ago
@carpercarl83 "the black box with onboard video" - Black boxes don't contain video.
" never as a plane crash ever done that the black box always survives" - It is rare for plane crashes to be intentional.
"yet passports of the terrorist" - The passport was ejected before the fires and collapses..and then more fires.... unlike the black boxes.
" cave monkeys" - Oh so not only are you an idiot, you are racist too.
markh1011 1 month ago
@markh1011 you are stupid, just seen your channel and its a load of shite. ok smart ass so the passports was ejected before the fires and the building callapse???? so what your saying is that the hi jackers all frue ther passports out the window before the plane crashed, because them planes went inside the buildings when they hit, so i dont fink so you work for youtube or something??? your videos just chat shit about the towers what about building number 7?
carpercarl83 1 month ago
@carpercarl83 "so what your saying is that the hi jackers all frue ther passports out the window" - What an poor attempt at a straw man. Do you realise that a airline seat cushion was also found on the sidewalk. If that could survive then surely a passport can.
"your videos just chat shit about the towers what about building number 7?"
- You mean the building the NYFD thought was going to collapse long before it did?
markh1011 1 month ago
@markh1011 why did bbc knews say that building number 7 callapsed 20mins before it did? most watched building in the world and they cant show a plane hitting the pentagon? BULLSHIT and your making yourself look lkie a fool go suck obamas dick you thick brainwashed twat, and so what if i called them cave monkeys your saying they flew planes into your buildings so why do you care is it because your trying your hardest not to let people no the truth. FUCK OFF
carpercarl83 1 month ago
Comment removed
markh1011 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@carpercarl83 "hy did bbc knews say that building number 7 callapsed 20mins before it did? " - Because it was expected to fall by the NYFD..due to loss of structural integrity. An easy mistake to make. There were several incorrect reports that day... that is just one of them.
"most watched building in the world" - lol where did you get that claim from? Truthers say some stupid things... The plane hit a wall... how many cameras do you put on a wall with nothing near it?
markh1011 1 month ago
@carpercarl83 " so what if i called them cave monkeys" - Do you realise some of them were more educated than you are?
" your saying they flew planes into your buildings" - Correct. Do you have a point?
markh1011 1 month ago
When you think about it, planes go about 600 mph ( not allowed over 700mph as it will break the sound barrier which they won't allow...) so it slicing a steel frame, is somewhat believably practical...
ITALY6767 1 month ago
Nice! :-) Now. Find out who is interested in crazy conspiracy theories that can easily be debunked!
martinvaxjo 1 month ago
@0.54 DAMN! That's some pilot! lmao.
offwiththefairies77 1 month ago
Steel slicing aluminum?
jawsflounderace 1 month ago
Ha! The comparison between the tubular pod on 175 and the other plane is hilarious, they are completely different! You just debunked your debunk!
mikmarshall80 1 month ago 2
Your a legend
WUDJABEABLE 1 month ago
@WUDJABEABLE He's a retard you mean, he's showing you are picture of a monkay and a bird and claims it is the same thing. He should do an IQ and observation test.
Xendrius 1 month ago
@Xendrius they are same underneath. watch flight 175 as the world watched, phonecalls made to familes saying they are on a hijacked aircraft. Please explain that to me?
WUDJABEABLE 1 month ago
@WUDJABEABLE They are NOT the same, it has the shape of a 767, but it has a split running through its middle that no airliner in the world has, and it is fully grey. If you click on my channel you'll hear 11 witnesses saying it was no airliner but a military plane, and you'll see closeups aswell.
The calls,easiest thing in the world for the covert CIA to fake, they likely had their assets on the planes. Atta was a CIA asset 100%.
None of them were directed by arabs, but the CIA.
Xendrius 1 month ago
@Xendrius so the people on these flights that never came home just vanished off the face of the earth?
WUDJABEABLE 1 month ago
@WUDJABEABLE Flown to a military base never to be seen again, all we know that the people who should have been on the plane are gone, and there have been no signs of proof that these planes were used as weapons on 911, neither in the pentagon, ny or shanksville.
This wasn't planned over night, the conspirators had all bases covered. One thing they could have done better is to actually fake the flight manifests and put the hijacker names on the list as passengers.
Xendrius 1 month ago
@Xendrius haha listen to yourself man, thousounds and thousounds of people to be involved for that to happen. Passengers on united 93 said the hijackers were arab anyway. The manifests show the passengers and hijackers names on these flights, mark bingham, atta, al-shehhi, jarrah etc.
WUDJABEABLE 1 month ago
@WUDJABEABLE Not really, the CIA had hijack drills on 9/11 as a cover if anything should go wrong as they boarded the planes with their arab assets, check out the flight manifests, no arab names, and those who were listed, many of them military personell with top security clearences, a kid can see something fishy was going on and that it was a covert operation.
And no you moron in 2003 people actually checked the flight manifests and there were no arab names.
Xendrius 1 month ago
@Xendrius the WTC was bombed in 93, terrorist activity did rise around the world so 9/11 drills were pretty obvious, CIA got intel of all kinds of activity, hijackings etc. The names of the hijackers are on manifests now.
WUDJABEABLE 1 month ago
@WUDJABEABLE And how do they blame people that have bin found alive?
carpercarl83 1 month ago
Comment removed
offwiththefairies77 1 month ago
Comment removed
offwiththefairies77 1 month ago
@offwiththefairies77 and your point is?!!!!
WUDJABEABLE 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@WUDJABEABLE What phone calls like.. "Mom, it's Mark Bingham.. You do believe me don't you mom??" ???!!!
offwiththefairies77 1 month ago
debunk how there was no collapse at the pentagon for 45 minutes after the "plane crash"
retardsincharge 2 months ago
2:06 does not show the tube on the other jet. Fail.
jawsflounderace 2 months ago
fucking shit sound. soo fag ;|
evilspecter666 2 months ago
@evilspecter666 Nice grammar, fag.
NowKillYourself 2 months ago
Then think of this. 1200 degrees is MORE than the Jet Fuel can burn. There were thermite sprinkled all over the building. Proof? The smoke is the proof. When thermite burns it releases hydrogen smoke. The building was SMOTHERED in smoke. And just incase some random noob says that there were gas lines. There were NO gas lines. The WTC were Class A Buildings meaning that there are no gas lines allowed.
A few 100 people are braingwashing TONS of people. Wake up. We can defeat them. WAKE UP!!!!!!!
Duhdudepokemonlove 2 months ago
Jesus... First of all heres what happened
1. Some Gov Agents sliced the CENTER beams at an ANGLE (like Controlled Demolition)
2. Then some Gov Agents added explosives to destroy the floors
3. Sub basement blew up.
4. 3 sec later. The plane crashed
5. While the tower withstood the crash the BOMBS was activated.
6. The Towers collapsed.
7. After the collapse. And a few hours later were theres nothing but rubble
8. Witnesses said there were POOLS of MOLTEN METAL burning about 1200 degrees.
Duhdudepokemonlove 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Duhdudepokemonlove
Who did it?
On YT: "Jewish Ex-Marine Speaks out on Israeli Involvement" "The proven 9/11 Foreknowledge of Isarel's agents" "The Truth Israel did 9/11 Rothschild Zionist Control America" "Israeli Art students in WTC connected to 9/11" "Ex-US Marine 9/11 was a Mossad False Flag Op" "World Fears US as war hungry drunk - ex Senator" Google: "Isreal did 9/11 All the Proof in the world" "Solving 9/11 - The deception that changed the world" "Kevin Barret - Rediscover 9/11"
CRschralper 2 months ago
@Duhdudepokemonlove i hope this is a Poe's Law case ...
androydnyc 1 month ago
What you guys are forgetting is that the so-called "passenger flights" were actually Decepticons. They transformed after impact, wrecking everything inside the towers until they collapsed, then they escaped through the sewers
uberjim83 2 months ago
@uberjim83 this.
jros83 2 months ago
How many times must I say this. The thermite paper is garbage.
Their DSC scans were not run in an inert atmosphere, meaning the results are possibly decades old paint.
The iron spheres were present (In their paper Fig 3c) before any "reaction".
The molten metal flowing out the window is exactly the same color as the aluminum alloy used in airplanes.
The 'eutectic swiss cheese' is from accelerated oxidation, easily comfirmed.
Nothing in their paper points to thermite.
lijebaley01 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@lijebaley01
Refute this:
On YT: "Jewish Ex-Marine Speaks out on Israeli Involvement" "The proven 9/11 Foreknowledge of Isarel's agents" "The Truth Israel did 9/11 Rothschild Zionist Control America" "Israeli Art students in WTC connected to 9/11" "Ex-US Marine 9/11 was a Mossad False Flag Op" "World Fears US as war hungry drunk - ex Senator" Google: "Isreal did 9/11 All the Proof in the world" "Solving 9/11 - The deception that changed the world" "Kevin Barret - Rediscover 9/11"
CRschralper 2 months ago
Anyways, this video shows how much credibility the maker expected in the first second, when the retard music starts. 9/11 = complete lie. Bin Laden = super lie.
Answer this, all muslims are not terrorists obviously. So why hide a pic of OBL by saying some muslim groups would be pissed, but the gitmo army sex and torture pics were let out.. those angered all muslims, and many non muslims, but we didnt care then did we? lol.. 9/11 what a joke on the US this shit is.
ThisPageStaysREAL 2 months ago
ROTFL @ the pic of the jet on the lawn at the pentagon!!! priceless.. Why is things directly related to the story we used to enter the middle east are always shrouded in bullshit? The planes hit the towers, for sure.. which planes they actually were is debate worthy, but anyway. The feds confiscated every tape with a possible view of the Penta-gone hit, why? And not 1 single "dramatic footage captured by tourist low quality evening news" clip is to be found? yea that makes sense..
ThisPageStaysREAL 2 months ago
9/11 = government inside job
11matt1 2 months ago
Why not throw a military plane in for comparison as well. That will shut them up
tyleryesta1 2 months ago
Comment removed
ipodnazar 2 months ago
Lol. You idiots actually believe this crap? What a waste of time. Bet you all voted for oBOMBa.
USMCMondoGecko 2 months ago
Comment removed
Jagstang67 2 months ago
HA I love this video it proves all those "truther" idiots wrong.
the8jrfan 2 months ago
@the8jrfan I love how your deunking videos take some obscure theory and disprove it. Try looking at the video showing the extra tech on the bottom of the planes. I never saw any popular videos on theories of missles from the planes. All these debunk videos made me question the story even more. Try putting out some videos disproving the core questions.
buzzybeemarketing 2 months ago
@buzzybeemarketing tell me which ones you are interested in and I will show you
the8jrfan 2 months ago
@the8jrfan Youtube this "cab lightpole 911"
buzzybeemarketing 2 months ago
@buzzybeemarketing Crap, not another resurrected truther sock puppet feigning ignorance of all the crap already debunked.
lijebaley01 2 months ago
@lijebaley01 I thought I would receive a more intelligent response.
buzzybeemarketing 2 months ago
@buzzybeemarketing You will get an intelligent response once you can show you have done intelligent research.
lijebaley01 2 months ago
@lijebaley01 I have. You should go look up the temperate and color ranges on fire, kerosene based fuel and it's flash point, nano thermite oxidizing compounds etc... I haven't seen any intelligent research from you except referencing quack science reports.
buzzybeemarketing 2 months ago
@buzzybeemarketing Ok, I'll pretend you know something, although you still haven't shown it. Tell me how, in Harrit's paper the conclusion of thermite can be drawn from heating a sample and first it burns a little, then it gives off a thermal expansion pop (sent a little shrapnel off). Thermite doesn't burn and if it was thermite, these would not be seperate occurrences. This actually proves it is NOT thermite.
lijebaley01 2 months ago
@lijebaley01 a paper cant prove anything by itself, theremite was proven beyond a doubt to be present at the WTCs. The melted steel, the eutectic swiss cheese steel, the molten metal and the iron spheres all point to thermate or thermite being there.
ThisPageStaysREAL 2 months ago
@buzzybeemarketing Now tell us why george w bush did it???? Is he still president?? Oh wait he was flying flight 93
Johnnyboy200406 2 months ago
Only kooks think it was missiles. Explain building 7 please.
xtelevisionset 2 months ago
HEY DEBUNKER GUESS WHAT?
YOUR VIDEO HAS LESS CLARITY THAN 240P.
SO UR THEORY IS RIDICULOUS
jasminhotel 2 months ago
@jasminhotel That's because they didn't want anyone seeing the extra tech attached to the bottom of the planes. It's remote control technology by Raytheon. A normal quality video would only make people ask more questions.
buzzybeemarketing 2 months ago
@buzzybeemarketing yep you are right. but who is raytheon.
jasminhotel 2 months ago
Comment removed
jasminhotel 2 months ago
you'd have to be pretty fucking stupid to think that's a missile
gagsterde 2 months ago
at 0:28 the plane has already hit but what RKOwens4 said about kinetic energy makes alot of sense and the two pertrusions on the under side is how ua used to paint the underside of their plains
mrevilmarsbar 3 months ago
funny how your attempts at debunking always fail miserably. funny how the explosion only happens at the tip of the plane if what you say is true, then the wings would have sparked too as they hit, but alas they did not, only the tip did, and heck the picture you showed, show us it happened even before impact (:28)
about flight 767 why is the one hitting the tower all black? explain that!
sh9683 3 months ago
@sh9683 the same didnt happen to the wings because the impact would have slowed down the plane
mrevilmarsbar 3 months ago
@mrevilmarsbar lol, even the clips in this video shows tail breaking off and creating sparks as it slows down, maybe you should try a little harder. explain why in the picture at 0:28 seconds. the explosion happens right before the plane touches the tower, so that picture don't help this videos attempts!
sh9683 3 months ago
the truth is what everyone is told unless you dont beleave what you are told.i for one dont beleave the govts.story on what happeen on 911.you can ask and u can vote but you will never be told the truth never!the govt controls your news even fox everyone that beleaves bush had nothing to do with 911 and took us to a war far are safty is a sleep now obama is startin new wars wake up people.the past 10 years are govt. has been pulling the wool over are eye.i dont put nothing past are govt.of greed
jcb570 3 months ago
@WTC7seven methinks you need to watch the whole video... not that so-called "truthers" like actual proof of something
Defrostmode 3 months ago
this music is strangely suiting
jonjones1066 3 months ago
the music is strangely suiting
jonjones1066 3 months ago
While you are trying to debunk this small theory about a flash maybe you can tell use what's attached to the bottom of the plane.
WTC7seven 3 months ago
tactical mute imbound
KneeCapHill 3 months ago
we see the flash before the planes hit these buildings. we know this because the flash happens before the plane meets its own shadow.
redman721 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It has been PROVEN BY NIST themselves that WTC7 WAS BLOWN UP. They tried to hide it in their preliminary report but were forced by David Chandler to in the final one admit to a 2,25 SECOND PERIOD OF FREE FALL. They then tried to divert attention from that by focusing on an average. Free fall, even for just a period, is possible ONLY through controlled demolition. 9/11 - INSIDE JOB.
/watch?v=eDvNS9iMjzA&feature=related
/watch?v=iXTlaqXsm4k&feature=related
/watch?v=v3mudruFzNw&feature=related
HurburBurbur 3 months ago
@HurburBurbur SOME DUMBASS DEBUNKER FLAGGED YOUR VALUABLE MESSAGE. I JUST REVERSED IT.
jasminhotel 2 months ago
@jasminhotel
Thankz man. Some people just can't handle the truth, huh? Shut you up and shoot you down. Well, that doesn't work no more. It's a new age.
HurburBurbur 2 months ago
@HurburBurbur The same thing could be said for both parties, a lot of people arent willing to accept that they are wrong so its always the other side thats not willing to admit it. Obvious debate tactics that dont accomplish anything other than "your wrong!" - "NO YOUR WRONGER AND CANT ADMIT IT!" lol
ElxxChupacabra07 2 months ago
@ElxxChupacabra07
Well I agree it's the case for the less serious and there are plenty around. Those are not willing to check out alleged facts, follow evidence based research and investigate on their own. Those who don't do this falls back on rethorics. But it's a cold hard fact that WCT 7 indeed fell in freefall spead for 2,25 s in the area that was examined which were a mere 18 of 47 floors. NIST were forced to include it though they tried to hide it in their draft. I've read the reports.
HurburBurbur 2 months ago
@HurburBurbur Yes I agree, I just dont believe that the towers were blown up, theres just too much to cover up and much easier ways to go about things and I have a hard time believing that government officials are intelligently capable of hiding it. I do however agree to a point that they let it happen and took advantage of the event. Knowing what weve been doing to the people of the middle east for the last 50 years, Im surprised that we havnt been attacked more.
ElxxChupacabra07 2 months ago
debunked my ass, why are all the pictures of flight 175 blurry?
quez76 3 months ago
@quez76 Because, unlike most tech, certain computers cant enhance images like you think they can. And anyways, the proof is shown. Simple physics.
xxchristswarriorxx1 3 months ago
You sir are so full of it. Missile?
shahrarazad 3 months ago
Well,that was 2 1/2 minutes of my live that I wont be getting back,
oh,when WHAT hit the pentagon?
pabdehoon 3 months ago
@pabdehoon A plane.
Redgrant80 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Israel did 9/11 - ALL THE PROOF IN THE WORLD
theinfounderground[.]com/forum/viewtopic[.]php?t=5367
TyroneSandalphon 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
AN EXPERIENCE THAT WILL TAKE YOU BACK
TO THAT DAY.. TO GIVE YOU AN OPPORTUNITY TO KNOW
WHAT IT WAS TO BE THERE.. THAT DAY…
AND A SAFE RETROSPECTION FOR THOSE WHO WERE.
THAT IS ONE WAY TO DESCRIBE WHAT IT IS.
'Tuesday Morning in September' Runtime 130 minutes.
Available now on DVD.
tusmorninginsept 3 months ago