wlorenz65, yeah that's classified as a toy seriously, a Robot is automatic... what is that? the only thing I see that robot do on it's own is see the object and turn its head. I'd say it's 1.8% complete robot.
1 Point for making it turn its head and
0.3 for making it detect something and then the rest for memorizing it.
@wlorenz65 the human brain's programmer took a little longer ^_^ (a few million years), and the human robot takes a little longer to enact learning :) (a few years)
Nice. Now try to figure out how it can understand the "concept" of a cereal box, instead of memorizing every individual box. We humans know thousands of objects and we can recognize stuff we've never seen before too.
We need better processors, fast. Can't wait for those groundbraking memristor chips to come out. Neural network processor units... NNPU's. :)
@abdalian37 memory is very cheap today, and the representation is very small, we don't even need to store the actual images, just some numbers (SIFT features)
nice on the realistic movements. im assuming this is a demo program tho. it seems a bit odd if it's only function is too look at each object in turn..
wow, 3 axis neck plus 2 times 2 axis eyes plus 2 eyelids, thats 9 motors only for it's head. Really impressive, and the eye-head movement are really smooth! frickin impressive. but that gazing-mode is really not as nice asimo who more plainly asks about objects instead.
shouldn't it base the selection of the objects also on an evaluation of "trust" on person showing the object? (in addition to 'proximity'). what i mean is: isn't a child is more likely to pay attention to (or 'learn from') its parents than a stranger that gets very close to it?
treating anything as object: if an object it already has 'learnt' by proximity (say, a parent) shows another object, then the new object is 'learnt' as well (regardless of how far this second one is)
makes sense. It does require a higher level of cognition for that tho. You have to have already a sort of "class", the trustworthy people class, and have the recognition of them in the scene affect the behavior of this module
Oh, but can it make judgements about objects its never seen before? >:D Say, see a chair and being told its a chair, then seeing a stool and thinking its a type of chair?
He's looking a porn.... d-bag. With all the naked women doing stuff to each other online, do you think ANYBODY would actually spend the time to send signals to a robot?
Creeepy......
kkuznecovv 1 month ago
ketchup ...catsup...ketchup ...catsup...
Anything2bCool 11 months ago
After it has learned everything, you will be amazed as it doesn't move and flicks its head around like the exorcist, trying to gaze upon everything.
Zormac 11 months ago
wlorenz65, yeah that's classified as a toy seriously, a Robot is automatic... what is that? the only thing I see that robot do on it's own is see the object and turn its head. I'd say it's 1.8% complete robot.
1 Point for making it turn its head and
0.3 for making it detect something and then the rest for memorizing it.
RebleINR 1 year ago
Comment removed
RebleINR 1 year ago
Human brains find out on their own that it is useful to separate the
enviroment into objects.
iCub instead needs programmers to implement the concept of an "object" in its software.
This means that iCub cannot learn to recognize combinations of objects or procedures as useful. It needs programmers again.
wlorenz65 1 year ago
@wlorenz65 the human brain's programmer took a little longer ^_^ (a few million years), and the human robot takes a little longer to enact learning :) (a few years)
But we'll get there ^_^, inevitably
(unless we kill ourselves XD)
WurmD 8 months ago
@WurmD Well, there is a project at IM-CLeVeR.eu but I haven't seen any videos of the CLEVER-K iCub yet.
One thing is clear: A true learning robot needs a skin. This makes it easy to filter out all those AI cheaters :)
wlorenz65 8 months ago
Nice. Now try to figure out how it can understand the "concept" of a cereal box, instead of memorizing every individual box. We humans know thousands of objects and we can recognize stuff we've never seen before too.
We need better processors, fast. Can't wait for those groundbraking memristor chips to come out. Neural network processor units... NNPU's. :)
noxure 1 year ago
@noxure there is already neural network that classifies things
roleplayman 10 months ago
we need open source robots, because i would never buy a close one, because i dont know if it wants to kill me or to capture information about me.
walolinux 1 year ago
So what does it do ??
Come on smart people... Make something useful
79expand 1 year ago
Fucking creepy!!!
fishontuesday 1 year ago
why only the space is limitation? Is there no limit due to memory?
abdalian37 1 year ago
@abdalian37 memory is very cheap today, and the representation is very small, we don't even need to store the actual images, just some numbers (SIFT features)
WurmD 1 year ago
nice on the realistic movements. im assuming this is a demo program tho. it seems a bit odd if it's only function is too look at each object in turn..
rapidrory 1 year ago
@rapidrory "what is the purpose of a baby?" :) "what is the purpose of trying to create a 3 year old robotic child?"
WurmD 1 year ago
*screams*
AggieMaryann 1 year ago
i know kids like that..
lygophile 2 years ago
Advertising coco pops ftw?
Explorer360 2 years ago 10
he owns hes never seen a box of cereal in his robot life XD
golddean 2 years ago
wow, 3 axis neck plus 2 times 2 axis eyes plus 2 eyelids, thats 9 motors only for it's head. Really impressive, and the eye-head movement are really smooth! frickin impressive. but that gazing-mode is really not as nice asimo who more plainly asks about objects instead.
creapy looks and moves, but avesome tech
puredihydrogenoxide 2 years ago
I wouldn't mind one of those in my house, but only if they make them look less creepy
gunvor69 2 years ago
@ Spooks. Me!
@ Gaydessert. Sense the sarcasm.
v777no 2 years ago
This is great! But they need to change its huge scary eyes! Make them smaller or give it eyelids.
Ryuuji91 2 years ago
The systematic cuteness formula states:
cute = eye_size / head_size
But yes, it does need eyelids.
DarksporkLeader 2 years ago
@DarksporkLeader she has eyelids :) shw was just feeling really surprised with all the new objects XD
WurmD 1 year ago
iRobot is just a movie..... Nothing like that will ever happen unless they are programed to do that....
and btw 2012 aint real.. its just then end of the mayan calender..
M0zBoZ 2 years ago
Wow basing your facts on movies is retarded. Didn't anyone ever tell you not to believe everything you see in a movie? Dipshit.
GayDessert 2 years ago
called a joke.
keep up with the sharp wit.
dannelchannel 2 years ago
Why in the world would anyone want something that creepy in their house?
spooks4545 2 years ago
It's simple object recognition, nothing special.
systat 2 years ago
Everything has to begin somewhere. You sound like this type of thing is easily achievable by anybody.
They sent people to the moon also...I guess that was nothing special either.
tcuk 2 years ago
thats creepy not gonna lie
lovetohateyou2 2 years ago 2
shouldn't it base the selection of the objects also on an evaluation of "trust" on person showing the object? (in addition to 'proximity'). what i mean is: isn't a child is more likely to pay attention to (or 'learn from') its parents than a stranger that gets very close to it?
treating anything as object: if an object it already has 'learnt' by proximity (say, a parent) shows another object, then the new object is 'learnt' as well (regardless of how far this second one is)
does it make sense?
rhwinter 2 years ago
makes sense. It does require a higher level of cognition for that tho. You have to have already a sort of "class", the trustworthy people class, and have the recognition of them in the scene affect the behavior of this module
WurmD 2 years ago
Força Portugal :)
KingSilva10 2 years ago
What's the aim of this video?
AppLeo1990 2 years ago
I don't get it. The iCUb is open source but what should we do with it if we haven't a robot?
OlloX3 2 years ago
Play in the simulator :), it is available and open source as well.
WurmD 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Amateur brunette fcked pov - 1TUBEXXX[.]COM
gfcjaijdeahb 2 years ago 4
Oh, but can it make judgements about objects its never seen before? >:D Say, see a chair and being told its a chair, then seeing a stool and thinking its a type of chair?
BlockisticStudios 3 years ago
Now I know why I dont want children :)
JezebelDecibel 3 years ago
When is he going to shoot down the cerios with his eye-lazer?
onper 3 years ago 2
HAHAHA!! That would b 2 funny
Nathansgirl1989 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Gay... why is there a feller on a laptop giving commands??? get real.
cherokee2end 3 years ago
He's looking a porn.... d-bag. With all the naked women doing stuff to each other online, do you think ANYBODY would actually spend the time to send signals to a robot?
get real
trdc3lica 3 years ago
oh , thats awesome
rzspark 3 years ago 2
Wow
cdoep 3 years ago 7