getup is a biased tool of the ALP. they don't represent the people, they stopped doing that when labor started paying them to create better propaganda than their own media monkeys could manage.
@Bozonofski you are a brainwashed moron. i used to support getup until i witnessed them gradually cease pushing issues that people actually cared about and started pushing the ALP's agenda. I used to be an ALP voter, so in no way am I biased. I left Getup before i gave up on ALP, so get your facts straight before you go insulting people you wanker.
An aircraft had 5 passengers and was about to crash. Only had 4 parachutes. Mr Obama said "the world needs me" I will take a parachute and jumped. Juliar Gillard said "I am the Prime minister, smartest woman in Australia, She took one and jumped. Bob Brown said" I am the leader of the Greens,I'll take one and he jumped. John Howard the 4th passenger said to the 5th passenger a 10 year old girl "You take the last one" The girl said" No, you take it Mr Howard, Juliar Gillard took my school bag "
@LazarusCato Last comment to you LazarusCato - The coalition of Labor / Greens / Independents is ruining this gorgeous country that I have loved for my 54years. I have seen quite a few governments in my time here. I have voted Labor, Liberal & for Independents over the years. There have been governments that I have liked, some that I have not liked but none before that I have had a "total disrespect" for until now. I hate this current Ferral Government (pun intended) with a passion!!!!!!!!!!!!
@LazarusCato Married when I was 17 & had nothing. My husband & I have worked hard all ourlives, sometimes even 2 jobs at onece, (7days a week 7am to 11pm). This enabled us to buy a home we love & provide a good education for our only child. This was always possible in Australia. I see this is not possible any more for my son's generation. I do not approve of the waste of our tax dollars as has happened to all the mismanaged programs by Rudd/Gillard/Swan & I do not approve of the blatant lies.
@TheGladeGirl how is it not possible? Australia has an unemployment rate of 5.1% (there's plenty of jobs) - there's no law stopping people from buying houses, so your son can buy a house if he wants.
Rudd/Gillard/Swan are shit politicians no doubt, but you give our political system too much credit - most of what affects peoples lives in this country is at the hand of corporations - not government.
There's no point talking to you, looking at your profile you're just a partisan troll.
@LazarusCato Yes you have wasted your time because you have a closed mind. The cost of living has gone up so much in Australia that we just pay the bills to live now, nothing left over to save. So many jobs have reduced hours also ... where I live in Sydney a house cost is out of reach. You obviously don't live in the real world. I feel sorry for you - you are an unaware individual who has nothing to offer this country. Grow up & get a job. Don't write to me again - I will ignore you.
@TheGladeGirl it's you who have the closed mind, the cost of living is vastly out of the governments sphere of influence. Alot of our jobs have gone overseas not because of the government, but because of corporations seeking to maximise profits - its you who needs to wise up. Have an enlightening life - you need one.
Getup is the vehicle for naive GenY's and old socialists to act like intellectuals while they tell you how they want to spend OTHER PEOPLE'S money.
Like Sheik (Mr Frequent Flyers) very few live the life the preach. They should publish audited data on what % of their over-stated membership have Zero Footprint, invested in Solar, Hybrid Cars, or 6Star Rated Homes.
Answer: Single Digits. Because that costs money. The type of income that makes these Socialist automatically despise a person.
Fuck this carbon tax. Fuck the greens. We need a political party that understands how to run an economy responsibly. Forget Labor - they can't run a damn lemonade stand without it going bankrupt. Geutp Australia are irresponsible and sneaky wankers who are lobbyists for the UN.
BTW BOB BROWN treason with his illegal plebiscite bill that removes the right to a referendum under the rules of constitution of Australia and replace it with a republic ,Totally illegal attempt to remove your rights liberties and freedoms, If Australia becomes a federation then say goodbye too our constitution the last protection regular Australians have left, only a inderpendant can save us now but I havent seen one that has the balls too tell the truth yet
@schmoinator total agreement from me mate, people dont realise a carbon tax will up all prices of all products for eg. all energy all fuel an many others so people dont realise the first 2 affect everyone an right now this carbon tax is causing million an nillion of 3rd world people too starve too death due too all the carbon tax price hikes, so all who want a carbon tax like the greens support mass starvation an death of 3rd world humans,
@will3205 from fossil fuels num nuts. not co2 that exists in the normal carbon cycle. this is carbon that has been buried for millions of years and we are re-introducing it into the atmosphere. get it? no climate scientist says carbon itself is a problem but the level of carbon in the atmosphere will cause the climate to alter. that is all. do the math.
A price on pollution only hurts the consumer. The big end of town passes on costs to us so they can pay to pollute. Meanwhile, the threat of further changes will send investors offshore to developing countries that have woeful environmental laws. Emissions will actually rise because of our faux action on carbon pollution. The fact that no EU nation will meet their targets by 2020 is evidence the scheme is a sham.
Arh the good old ETS, sure we can introduce it! if we want to stuff up the country even more! What people dont realise is:
A) Its not effective (proven in the europe where since the EU introduced a similar system CO2 emissions have INCREASED by 2%)
B) It will further reduce australia's international competitiveness in regards to industry, promoting manufacturers to move offshore to places like china which is still in the asia pacific region but does not have this tax
C) YOU WILL BE PAYING FOR IT!!! worried about electricity prices now? wait until this new tax comes in! essentially EVERY SINGLE THING YOU BUY WILL BE TAXED! (even a cup of coffee!)
and
D) there are MORE EFFECTIVE, EFFICENT methods avaliable to the government which will not destroy the economy. Can't you see that the whole structure is not about the environment, it's about revenue raising!!
@clayman1982, there are numerous solutions towards offsetting carbon emission production within australia while promoting investment and growth within the specified industry.For example,unambiguously targeting the household sector and the rapid increase in demand for energy due to new houses, one could introduce new legisation making the implemention of 3kw solar systems (minimum system size) mandatory on all new households and major renovations of established homes costing in excess of $50,000
Although this will not see an actual reduction in current production of carbon from are (mostly coal driven) power stations. It has the potential to offset in excess of 686,463.37 tonnes of carbon which would has been produced otherwise in providing 100% of these new households needs in energy, increasing with each year. While injecting $1,148,180,000 per annum into the solar production and installation industry, creating more jobs and stimulating the economy.
In addition, this will actually SAVE the government money, as less investment into new power stations would be needed as with a 3kw per hour system, the average house could be provided up to 70% of its energy needs per annum. In addition, the initial cost of the system will effectively will pay for itself over time, proving there to be no negative impacts towards the household sector in the long term,as a matter of fact,it will actually generate money for the owners of the house in the long run.
@clayman1982, This is only one solution toward the (as economists call it) negative externality (a negative effect on a party not directly involved in a transaction, which results in a market failure) and proves to be more economically sound then the ETS while producing ACTUAL results..... As julia says we need to, "move forward" and get serious with real solutions to carbon production.
wow - talk about putting a troll in his place...I'm going to go back under my bridge where I belong and not bother anyone for awhile. Bro, seriously...If you ran for election recently, you probably would have won.
I'm not convinced that an ETS is a bad idea. But you are 100% correct in that we should be subsidising more renewable energy solutions.
I believe the debate must continue, but not between you and me as I am on youtube and have no influence on policy.;)
Honestly the main problem with the ETS is that it will be isolated to Australia within the asia pacific region, further narrowing the already specilised industries that can function in the country as a viable alternative to imports. If we somehow managed to get china, japan, indonesia (ect) to have one as well (which they won't) it would become a viable option. But as it stands, no. Unfortunately, I am still in year 12 at brisbane grammar school but I am currently looking into a political career
So if you see a guy in about 10 years who actually has policies which take into account social, economic and environmental factors and issues of the time, balancing them into equlibrium and then addressing the problems with REAL solutions, that would be me. So please vote for him haha.
A vote for the Greens is a vote for Labor. A minority party will never gain power, so you're pretty much voting for the economy's demise if you vote for the Greens.
and as for their actual 'policies', how are they going to run the country? they come out with all these concepts like carbon tax, and the Australian public is like 'yeah, thats a great idea', but who is actually going to foot the bill for all this eco stuff? people like the idea of going green, but they dont want the extra cost.
@hiusmellnice the Greens have the balance of Power in the Senate and will for the next 6years a Carbon tax will Come More boat people will Come Tony abbott I will Stop the Boats I will Stop the Spending hahahaha He is 11billion out of pocket and finds it hard to live on $200,000 a year ...Scandinavian Countries Have gone Green and have the strongest economy in the European Union
Those who are rich vote for Liberal, those who are smart vote for Labor.
Actually, i don't really care what party wins...but i fear for my family's future if the Liberals take over. How about we all ditch Labor AND Liberal and vote Green?? After all, if the planet dies, we're stuffed. Nothing else would matter.
@DigbyCat "I won't be rushing out to get my daughters vaccinated against cervical cancer" / "Abortion is the easy way out. It's hardly surprising that people should choose the most convenient exit from awkward situations." (i don't know when mister abbott had his last abortion but i'm informed its not an easy choice) / and on aboriginals: "There may not be a great job for them but whatever there is, they just have to do it." / all quotes from mr abbott, we're moving forward from people like him.
Do all the Leftests and other drongos and Yobbos,who vote this bunch of Labor cock suckers back in look forward to a shitty way of life .Im in Canberra and even here its becoming a dogs breakfast of traffic,run down roads and footpaths,lack of proper public transport and its becoming chockers here.AND THE GOVERNMENT WILL KEEP FLOODING THIS COUNTRY WITH FORIEGNERS FROM THE 3RD WORLD,YET TELL US WE HAVE TO REDUCE OUR CARBON FOOTPRINT
@DigbyCat I've heard "we will stop the boats" so many times and i've asked the same question every time "how?" Proposed Liberal geopolitical laws that are dictatorial would classify Australia as a country that refuses UN imposed international laws.
Even if Tony Abbott does get in he cannot possibly stop the boats without being thrown out by the Governor General for disobeying direct UN imposed law.
@84K3R80I "UN imposed international laws" are not binding on Australia or any country. Tony Abbott will make Australia look bad by "disobeying direct UN imposed law". That is all. The Governor General most certainly does not have the power to remove a Prime Minister for "disobeying direct UN imposed law". I'm so sorry.
That's not to say that I think "turning the boats back" is a good idea. I find it abhorent. That doesn't mean I want lies spread about Australia's obligations.
@ButFli when was the last time you checked the law? From what I saw a week and a half ago the Governer General most certainly has the right to dismiss the PM for disobeying UN law. In fact the law stipulating to countries receiving immigration through various forms stipulates that they "must be screened and processed to asses the migrants propensity to be of harm the given country and/or commit acts against the given country." I wouldn't have written anything if I was going to 'spread lies'.
@84K3R80I I am not denying the state of international law. I am disputing your claim that it is binding on Australia and that the Governor General can or will remove a Prime Minister for breaking it. I'd be interested to know how it is even possible for a Prime Minister to "disobey UN law" regarding refugees or immigration. An Australian Prime Minister does not make laws alone nor are they our head of state. How can they be held personally responsible for Australian laws?
@ButFli It is at the moment but thats not to say that it can't be altered in the future. The leader of the governing body is not directly held accountable for human rights violations by turning back boats it's true. I think you will find that unless Abbott gets an offshore processing centre in Naroo, his policy cannot be employed depending on another countries leader's decision. The UN has a lot more clout than you may believe I had the same mindset as you until recently.
@DigbyCat well I see where you're coming from, but I must say everybody keeps using the insulation disaster against the government, when in actual fact it would have worked had the system not been taken advantage of by greedy people. A lot of people became 'insulation installers' overnight and ripped pensioners and other people off, did crappy jobs that lead to tragic deaths. The system was made a bit too easy to be abused, for sure, but it was greedy lowlives who ruined it for us.
@DigbyCat I'm pretty sure she's not allowing more boat people. She herself said she wants a controlled and sustainable Australian population, and that she's not for a bigger Australia.
@nathandailo do you have any idea of the actual numbers of boat people entering the country. Its fuck all. Just media blowing it out of proportion for racist australia to get all hyped about.
The more greens in the house, the less of a see-saw between the two-opposing parties.
At least then there will be a balance of interests. Besides- I don't want to see someone so staunchly opposed to my freedom as Abbott leading the country.
At least with the Greens, we'll have SOME socially forward people representing us. Not to mention the only party who is TRULY concerned with the environment- not just trying to shoo it under the carpet.
@Treemeadow You know a lot of green votes apparently roll over to Labor. That might not be a bad thing, I don't know how you feel, I just thought I should mention it. But Greens aside, we definitely need to keep our independents in so that things run smoother in parliament! Yay the tipping power of the minority!
@icequeen9 It only rolls over if you place Labor as your next preference and Greens don't get in.
So if you vote Green, and put oh- Shooters Party as your next pref. Greens don't get in- it goes to Shooters, shooters don't get in, then it goes to the next.
So if you put Liberal as yours after Green- it'll go to liberal *gag*
I'm not keen on Labor OR Liberal. I'm going Greens and Independants.
@Treemeadow right, because it's so comforting to have people who prefer animal and environmental life over human life, have no idea how things actually affect the environment and tell us that "Everyone must make sacrifices" when they're the ones living comfortably wealthy lives in the cities. Black Saturday? Yeah, the only reason that was half as devastating as it was was because idiots like the greens wouldn't allow backburning or even let people clear trees on their own property...
@silfuryn As somebody who lived in heavily wooded area for almost 10 years, I know that it's the CFA that dictates and regulates back burning. It's left to their better judgement. Not in the hands of bureaucrats in the cities. Don't act like Bob Brown was sitting on everybody's doorstep syphoning the fluid from people's lighters. Nonsense like this just pisses me off.
@Treemeadow How is Tony Abbott opposed to your freedom? how will getting more greens in the house restore balance to the house? they'll just side with Labor anyway.
Tony Abbott is opposed to my being able to marry the person I love.
In the House- there are seats representing each party. The house with the most seats gets the most sway over decisions, because they vote on everything. With more Labor- the votes lean labor. With more Liberal, they lean liberal. With Green, it balances them out.
And do you even know what socially forward means? It means anti-discrimination- and they are the least discriminatory of all the parties.
@TreemeadowIn case you're an absolute moron, I think I should just remind you again that the greens are socially incompetent and, for this reason, they will only ever have enough seats to give their preferences to labor. Secondly, it is most definitely a good thing that power will either sway one way or the other, that's what an election is for, not to determine who is "sort of in power" but to determine who is undeniably in power.
@Treemeadow Furthermore, Tony Abbott and the liberal party aren't the only one's opposed to same sex marriage, so are Julia Gillard and the labor party. In anycase, marriage isn't important in a relationship, it is just a petty ceremony and a document saying "these two people are now recognised as being joined in that abstract, earthly and pointless thing we call 'marriage'" - whether you're gay or straight, marriage is pointless so there are far more important things to be worrying about.
You must be completely naive if you think marriage has no benefit. If I had a partner in another country, I couldn't have her immigrate like a married couple could. If she was sick and dying in hospital- I would be at the mercy of the administrators, because there are no requirements to allow de-facto partners in wards, like married couples.
Furthermore- Gillard is not opposed to Marriage in the long term. She has no religious opposition to it, like Abbott. With G, it could happen, A- no way.
Not in this country. The most we have is recognition of partnership- which is FAR below even Civil Union Wow, you really shouldn't argue without doing your research first...and you know what? Even if they DID have civil unions- ALL people have the right to be self-determined. Why can't gay people marry the people they love? More than half of Australia's population are for Gay-marriage. Shouldn't our government be listening to us? Abbott won't.
@Treemeadow abbott won't, neother will gillard, stop being a biased bitch. And by the way, you officially lost this argument long ago when you said you supported the greens.
Thankyou so much for showing Australia what sort of quality you Liberal supporters are bred from. Swearing, ignorant, old fashioned-
Hey everybody! Isn't this guy such a *fine* representation of what Liberal is all about? Swearing, using language offensive to women, poor spelling and ignorance of political and social matters?
Get off the computer, young troll, and go back to school.
@Treemeadow offensive to women? firstly, I thought you were a man, secdondly, please don't start with that "femenist" nonsense, it's tasteless enough to support the greens.
Well, if your definition of "talking" includes crude insults and ignorance of current Political practice while arguing, then you need a new dictionary.
@Treemeadow I don't need "anything new", I don't have to keep changing the subject - My original argument is still solid. Meanwhile, you have to keep trying to bring up new ones, each time becoming more pedantic and pathetic and, finally, desperately predictable by accusing me of being a troll - a common last resort for people who can't accept they are wrong.
OK, now you're just answering for answerings sake. You just want the last word because you're jealous I got more thumbs ups than you. Thats really what it's all about, isn't it?
Seriously, though, why are you wasting your time on this? You're obviously a troll.
You strike me as being one of those induviduals who always harp on about THEY'RE interests in conversation. I bet you're socially awkward and don't get out much, either.
Thats a shame. Perhaps you'd learn a thing or too about the world- particularily one area that involves how to accept people who think differently from you- but judging from your Channel page, I doubt thats an area of great familiarity to you, so I'll let it slide.
Charging for pollution. That's stupid. It won't help anything. Companies will be charged more and those costs get passed down to us.
Maybe if we didn't waste millions of dollars on unnecessary crap like internet filters and failed insulation schemes, we could invest in green energy.
A lot of would you like a cup of coffee and talk about climate change what excites them rightist challenge that it combines we can lead the country to the they say will like that company that us group all of the climate revolution you have rented twenty million people of all the time of the revolution united states and thanks the car and gene i not a problem on the ticket the storm with tiny depict action on that didn't exactly team o'brien.
@DigbyCat then I guess your the same. The coalition could abolish universal health care, destroy the environment for profit, sell off every state owned asset for pennies in the dollar and make university education only for the rich............But you'd still vote for them.
Everyone says she stabbed Rudd in the back... I think she did what no other man was willing to do and that is stand up to a politcal tyrannt. Rudd was nothing more than a bully who would not let anyone make a suggestion and any suggestions that were any good became his ideas. I for one dont want a PM that is a bully and an opourtunist. As for Gillard...yes she's female...yes she's a ranga....and yes she has bigger balls than anyone else by a long shot.
If more than 90% of scientists are wrong, then it would be even more worrying than climage change, but the fact is that global warming hasn't been debunked by anyone except in the minds of those who are unwilling to accept what is in many respects a reality.
I'm Australian and ashamed that we haven't made a move on carbon tax. INDIA has just put in place a carbon tax! Read BusinessWeek. So they can do it but we're too gutless. Oh wait, I know, after the third world becomes a mess of climate refugees, the climate problem goes away. Now it's a refugee problem and we all know that's easy to solve.
okay at the very very very beginning when it's at 0:00 it is filmed at the Surry Hills library which is a 5 minute walk from where I live!
TheKokokiss 1 month ago
how about get fucked julia
dogmullstudios 2 months ago 2
i love that "i need u to get rid of this for me" with a KEVIN 07 shirt covered in blood
OoopMAXqooO 2 months ago
Is that Craig from the chasers?
SarunJunior 3 months ago
"Enough Tim" haha
heygeorgina 3 months ago
Get up and out FWs
jazzysnaps 4 months ago
getup is a biased tool of the ALP. they don't represent the people, they stopped doing that when labor started paying them to create better propaganda than their own media monkeys could manage.
hhutcheo 5 months ago 2
@hhutcheo You're a biased tool.
Bozonofski 4 months ago
@Bozonofski Get back to your psychology essay, honey. It's due tomorrow.
sazmuppet 4 months ago 3
@Bozonofski you are a brainwashed moron. i used to support getup until i witnessed them gradually cease pushing issues that people actually cared about and started pushing the ALP's agenda. I used to be an ALP voter, so in no way am I biased. I left Getup before i gave up on ALP, so get your facts straight before you go insulting people you wanker.
hhutcheo 4 months ago 4
She's hot. Gillard is a Ranga Minga.
PX125E 5 months ago
the NAZI's would be proud of 'Get Up'
bennyboytalk 5 months ago 4
@bennyboytalk Nazis he reckons!
ohyeahhoneysheband 6 days ago
gillard = repulsive dictator.
getup = failed artschool drop outs.
Soundgarden8497 5 months ago 5
@Soundgarden8497 Dictator he reckons!!
ohyeahhoneysheband 6 days ago
Omg... does anyone know the real facts?
trainfan761 6 months ago
JULIAR GILLARD IS DAMAGED GOODS!!
JUST LIKE GETUP!!
darlindell 6 months ago 5
An aircraft had 5 passengers and was about to crash. Only had 4 parachutes. Mr Obama said "the world needs me" I will take a parachute and jumped. Juliar Gillard said "I am the Prime minister, smartest woman in Australia, She took one and jumped. Bob Brown said" I am the leader of the Greens,I'll take one and he jumped. John Howard the 4th passenger said to the 5th passenger a 10 year old girl "You take the last one" The girl said" No, you take it Mr Howard, Juliar Gillard took my school bag "
elghian 7 months ago
The bloody knife says it all.
HonourtheFire 7 months ago
Get Up ... and get out ! You are just Young communists like the Hitler Youth Movement.
TheGladeGirl 7 months ago
@TheGladeGirl you know some of the first people Hitler had killed were communists right?
LazarusCato 7 months ago
@LazarusCato Interesting .... so Hitler hated everyone..... and everyone hates Gillard!
TheGladeGirl 7 months ago
@TheGladeGirl Hitler hated everyone except white males and big business - which seem to be the Coalitions core constituency.
LazarusCato 7 months ago
@LazarusCato Last comment to you LazarusCato - The coalition of Labor / Greens / Independents is ruining this gorgeous country that I have loved for my 54years. I have seen quite a few governments in my time here. I have voted Labor, Liberal & for Independents over the years. There have been governments that I have liked, some that I have not liked but none before that I have had a "total disrespect" for until now. I hate this current Ferral Government (pun intended) with a passion!!!!!!!!!!!!
TheGladeGirl 7 months ago
@TheGladeGirl how is it being destroyed or ruined?
LazarusCato 7 months ago
@LazarusCato Married when I was 17 & had nothing. My husband & I have worked hard all ourlives, sometimes even 2 jobs at onece, (7days a week 7am to 11pm). This enabled us to buy a home we love & provide a good education for our only child. This was always possible in Australia. I see this is not possible any more for my son's generation. I do not approve of the waste of our tax dollars as has happened to all the mismanaged programs by Rudd/Gillard/Swan & I do not approve of the blatant lies.
TheGladeGirl 7 months ago
@TheGladeGirl how is it not possible? Australia has an unemployment rate of 5.1% (there's plenty of jobs) - there's no law stopping people from buying houses, so your son can buy a house if he wants.
Rudd/Gillard/Swan are shit politicians no doubt, but you give our political system too much credit - most of what affects peoples lives in this country is at the hand of corporations - not government.
There's no point talking to you, looking at your profile you're just a partisan troll.
LazarusCato 7 months ago
@LazarusCato Yes you have wasted your time because you have a closed mind. The cost of living has gone up so much in Australia that we just pay the bills to live now, nothing left over to save. So many jobs have reduced hours also ... where I live in Sydney a house cost is out of reach. You obviously don't live in the real world. I feel sorry for you - you are an unaware individual who has nothing to offer this country. Grow up & get a job. Don't write to me again - I will ignore you.
TheGladeGirl 7 months ago
@TheGladeGirl it's you who have the closed mind, the cost of living is vastly out of the governments sphere of influence. Alot of our jobs have gone overseas not because of the government, but because of corporations seeking to maximise profits - its you who needs to wise up. Have an enlightening life - you need one.
LazarusCato 7 months ago
lol!
gemmi1994 7 months ago
Getup is the vehicle for naive GenY's and old socialists to act like intellectuals while they tell you how they want to spend OTHER PEOPLE'S money.
Like Sheik (Mr Frequent Flyers) very few live the life the preach. They should publish audited data on what % of their over-stated membership have Zero Footprint, invested in Solar, Hybrid Cars, or 6Star Rated Homes.
Answer: Single Digits. Because that costs money. The type of income that makes these Socialist automatically despise a person.
EvilRoySlad3 8 months ago 2
um...........what
SplinterCell37 8 months ago
HUNGRY BEAST GUY!!!
MrAlaDog 8 months ago
getup australia....stands for young communists of Australia!
MRMILO57 8 months ago 4
Isn't that guy from Hungry Beast?
HeyThereMrPogoBox 8 months ago
Ads like this do not help anybody. What a waste of money.
'Get up!' can go to hell..."non-bias" my big toe!
fundamentalflaws 9 months ago 2
we need a Aboriginal prime minister at least they have nice coloured hair
SydneyKumaran 10 months ago
I know a drag queen in Sydney who looks and sounds just like Julia Gillard
thatcher88 10 months ago
i like the bloody knive and kevin 11 shirt lol
kane18O 10 months ago
╭∩╮（︶︿︶）╭∩╮
TheMellinghellcat 10 months ago
@TheMellinghellcat I like it! Mind if i copy?
muzlinkage 9 months ago
@muzlinkage lol yess. i like followers
TheMellinghellcat 9 months ago
eh
paganpilgrim 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this one is hot.
kefer123622 11 months ago
The guy at the end should have said, ''How about a Dare iced coffee?'' :P
LLuCidtr00per 11 months ago 44
Act on overpopulation THEN work on carbon emissions reduction you greenie left-wing radicals.
CanberraUser 1 year ago
AHAHA enough tim!
Maddyisnotshort13 1 year ago
Fuck this carbon tax. Fuck the greens. We need a political party that understands how to run an economy responsibly. Forget Labor - they can't run a damn lemonade stand without it going bankrupt. Geutp Australia are irresponsible and sneaky wankers who are lobbyists for the UN.
Rotpig 1 year ago
@capt777737
lII0l 1 year ago
That looks nothing like Julia Gillard. In real life her arse is seriously enormous.
timineale 1 year ago 31
BTW BOB BROWN treason with his illegal plebiscite bill that removes the right to a referendum under the rules of constitution of Australia and replace it with a republic ,Totally illegal attempt to remove your rights liberties and freedoms, If Australia becomes a federation then say goodbye too our constitution the last protection regular Australians have left, only a inderpendant can save us now but I havent seen one that has the balls too tell the truth yet
jimmycar83 1 year ago
@schmoinator total agreement from me mate, people dont realise a carbon tax will up all prices of all products for eg. all energy all fuel an many others so people dont realise the first 2 affect everyone an right now this carbon tax is causing million an nillion of 3rd world people too starve too death due too all the carbon tax price hikes, so all who want a carbon tax like the greens support mass starvation an death of 3rd world humans,
jimmycar83 1 year ago
HA PUT THIS ON TV AS AN AD HAHAHA
salrubz 1 year ago
HA
salrubz 1 year ago
@MrJimijazz149, No, it is because we have begun speaking about two types of Co2 here, and one we can tax.
will3205 1 year ago
Comment removed
will3205 1 year ago
@will3205 from fossil fuels num nuts. not co2 that exists in the normal carbon cycle. this is carbon that has been buried for millions of years and we are re-introducing it into the atmosphere. get it? no climate scientist says carbon itself is a problem but the level of carbon in the atmosphere will cause the climate to alter. that is all. do the math.
MrJimijazz149 1 year ago
... because Co2 is not pollution...
will3205 1 year ago
id bang the shit out of julia gillard
ThatInnerDarkness 1 year ago
A price on pollution only hurts the consumer. The big end of town passes on costs to us so they can pay to pollute. Meanwhile, the threat of further changes will send investors offshore to developing countries that have woeful environmental laws. Emissions will actually rise because of our faux action on carbon pollution. The fact that no EU nation will meet their targets by 2020 is evidence the scheme is a sham.
benjihatusilis3 1 year ago
is that miranda from sex and the city?
khsakura 1 year ago
fucking rangar SLUTTTTTTTTT
sickman112 1 year ago
this should definitely be a dare ice coffee ad haha.
77Gordinio77 1 year ago
Best bit is when she pulls out the knife and Kevin 07 t-shirt and says 'I need you to get rid of this for me'
TaylorTayMusic 1 year ago
"TONY IS ABOUT DIRECT ACTION! I'M ABOUT ACTING DIRECTLY." So so so true.
LadyLatias 1 year ago
Carbon Tax, Death Duty Tax, All this Tax, Whats next an Air Breathing Tax...
All the bloody goverment is caring about is money.
ViperOverLord 1 year ago
Arh the good old ETS, sure we can introduce it! if we want to stuff up the country even more! What people dont realise is:
A) Its not effective (proven in the europe where since the EU introduced a similar system CO2 emissions have INCREASED by 2%)
B) It will further reduce australia's international competitiveness in regards to industry, promoting manufacturers to move offshore to places like china which is still in the asia pacific region but does not have this tax
theguy459 1 year ago
C) YOU WILL BE PAYING FOR IT!!! worried about electricity prices now? wait until this new tax comes in! essentially EVERY SINGLE THING YOU BUY WILL BE TAXED! (even a cup of coffee!)
and
D) there are MORE EFFECTIVE, EFFICENT methods avaliable to the government which will not destroy the economy. Can't you see that the whole structure is not about the environment, it's about revenue raising!!
theguy459 1 year ago
@theguy459
Please name this more effective, efficient method. For all our sakes, please help.
clayman1982 1 year ago
@clayman1982, there are numerous solutions towards offsetting carbon emission production within australia while promoting investment and growth within the specified industry.For example,unambiguously targeting the household sector and the rapid increase in demand for energy due to new houses, one could introduce new legisation making the implemention of 3kw solar systems (minimum system size) mandatory on all new households and major renovations of established homes costing in excess of $50,000
theguy459 1 year ago
Although this will not see an actual reduction in current production of carbon from are (mostly coal driven) power stations. It has the potential to offset in excess of 686,463.37 tonnes of carbon which would has been produced otherwise in providing 100% of these new households needs in energy, increasing with each year. While injecting $1,148,180,000 per annum into the solar production and installation industry, creating more jobs and stimulating the economy.
theguy459 1 year ago
In addition, this will actually SAVE the government money, as less investment into new power stations would be needed as with a 3kw per hour system, the average house could be provided up to 70% of its energy needs per annum. In addition, the initial cost of the system will effectively will pay for itself over time, proving there to be no negative impacts towards the household sector in the long term,as a matter of fact,it will actually generate money for the owners of the house in the long run.
theguy459 1 year ago
@clayman1982, This is only one solution toward the (as economists call it) negative externality (a negative effect on a party not directly involved in a transaction, which results in a market failure) and proves to be more economically sound then the ETS while producing ACTUAL results..... As julia says we need to, "move forward" and get serious with real solutions to carbon production.
theguy459 1 year ago
*takes off hat*
@theguy459
wow - talk about putting a troll in his place...I'm going to go back under my bridge where I belong and not bother anyone for awhile. Bro, seriously...If you ran for election recently, you probably would have won.
I'm not convinced that an ETS is a bad idea. But you are 100% correct in that we should be subsidising more renewable energy solutions.
I believe the debate must continue, but not between you and me as I am on youtube and have no influence on policy.;)
clayman1982 1 year ago
Honestly the main problem with the ETS is that it will be isolated to Australia within the asia pacific region, further narrowing the already specilised industries that can function in the country as a viable alternative to imports. If we somehow managed to get china, japan, indonesia (ect) to have one as well (which they won't) it would become a viable option. But as it stands, no. Unfortunately, I am still in year 12 at brisbane grammar school but I am currently looking into a political career
theguy459 1 year ago
So if you see a guy in about 10 years who actually has policies which take into account social, economic and environmental factors and issues of the time, balancing them into equlibrium and then addressing the problems with REAL solutions, that would be me. So please vote for him haha.
theguy459 1 year ago
@theguy459
I'll join your party, we don't give a s**t who we offend, were going to do what needs to be done, damn it!
AgentTasmania 1 year ago
Julia is full of Carbon.....
breadbaker226 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Gillard's profile on the lifeinthmixtalk website is well worth a read, including the links to the Froebel method and the architecture of the mind
Cazzac111 1 year ago
when people dont know anything about past and present politics before they vote, we get history repeating itself...especially the children who vote
dograbbitbeaver 1 year ago
YOUR KIDS WILL LOOK GREAT IN THIS!!
ImperialGift 1 year ago
A vote for the Greens is a vote for Labor. A minority party will never gain power, so you're pretty much voting for the economy's demise if you vote for the Greens.
and as for their actual 'policies', how are they going to run the country? they come out with all these concepts like carbon tax, and the Australian public is like 'yeah, thats a great idea', but who is actually going to foot the bill for all this eco stuff? people like the idea of going green, but they dont want the extra cost.
hiusmellnice 1 year ago
@hiusmellnice the Greens have the balance of Power in the Senate and will for the next 6years a Carbon tax will Come More boat people will Come Tony abbott I will Stop the Boats I will Stop the Spending hahahaha He is 11billion out of pocket and finds it hard to live on $200,000 a year ...Scandinavian Countries Have gone Green and have the strongest economy in the European Union
flyerboy1963 1 year ago
the julia gillard impersonator looks like and sounds a bit like Jane Turner...
HeathH737 1 year ago
Shadow minister for Penis ..WHAT!
climinge change
schwipesy 1 year ago
THE ETS IS WHAT THE WORLD BANKS WANT... WAKE UP .. Gillard is RUN by the NWO just like OBAMA!
overeemrua 1 year ago
Is GetUp a political party? Why do they have to authorise their videos?
qlder 1 year ago
hahaha - whoever's making your vids needs a huge pat on the back. Loving them all.
Larsberry 1 year ago
Haha, love the clip! Mind you.....
Those who are rich vote for Liberal, those who are smart vote for Labor.
Actually, i don't really care what party wins...but i fear for my family's future if the Liberals take over. How about we all ditch Labor AND Liberal and vote Green?? After all, if the planet dies, we're stuffed. Nothing else would matter.
elementalistqueen 1 year ago
Is that the dude from Hungry Beast?
31974 1 year ago
@DigbyCat "I won't be rushing out to get my daughters vaccinated against cervical cancer" / "Abortion is the easy way out. It's hardly surprising that people should choose the most convenient exit from awkward situations." (i don't know when mister abbott had his last abortion but i'm informed its not an easy choice) / and on aboriginals: "There may not be a great job for them but whatever there is, they just have to do it." / all quotes from mr abbott, we're moving forward from people like him.
ThatKidFromAisle11 1 year ago
I lol'd.
henisacat 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
FUCK julia is ugly!!
Do all the Leftests and other drongos and Yobbos,who vote this bunch of Labor cock suckers back in look forward to a shitty way of life .Im in Canberra and even here its becoming a dogs breakfast of traffic,run down roads and footpaths,lack of proper public transport and its becoming chockers here.AND THE GOVERNMENT WILL KEEP FLOODING THIS COUNTRY WITH FORIEGNERS FROM THE 3RD WORLD,YET TELL US WE HAVE TO REDUCE OUR CARBON FOOTPRINT
ANY LABOR OR GREENS VOTER,YOU ARE A FKWIT
jimmycodmw2 1 year ago
@DigbyCat I've heard "we will stop the boats" so many times and i've asked the same question every time "how?" Proposed Liberal geopolitical laws that are dictatorial would classify Australia as a country that refuses UN imposed international laws.
Even if Tony Abbott does get in he cannot possibly stop the boats without being thrown out by the Governor General for disobeying direct UN imposed law.
84K3R80I 1 year ago
@84K3R80I The question you should be asking is not "how", but "why".
frazschmidt 1 year ago
@84K3R80I "UN imposed international laws" are not binding on Australia or any country. Tony Abbott will make Australia look bad by "disobeying direct UN imposed law". That is all. The Governor General most certainly does not have the power to remove a Prime Minister for "disobeying direct UN imposed law". I'm so sorry.
That's not to say that I think "turning the boats back" is a good idea. I find it abhorent. That doesn't mean I want lies spread about Australia's obligations.
ButFli 1 year ago
@ButFli when was the last time you checked the law? From what I saw a week and a half ago the Governer General most certainly has the right to dismiss the PM for disobeying UN law. In fact the law stipulating to countries receiving immigration through various forms stipulates that they "must be screened and processed to asses the migrants propensity to be of harm the given country and/or commit acts against the given country." I wouldn't have written anything if I was going to 'spread lies'.
84K3R80I 1 year ago
@84K3R80I I am not denying the state of international law. I am disputing your claim that it is binding on Australia and that the Governor General can or will remove a Prime Minister for breaking it. I'd be interested to know how it is even possible for a Prime Minister to "disobey UN law" regarding refugees or immigration. An Australian Prime Minister does not make laws alone nor are they our head of state. How can they be held personally responsible for Australian laws?
ButFli 1 year ago
@ButFli It is at the moment but thats not to say that it can't be altered in the future. The leader of the governing body is not directly held accountable for human rights violations by turning back boats it's true. I think you will find that unless Abbott gets an offshore processing centre in Naroo, his policy cannot be employed depending on another countries leader's decision. The UN has a lot more clout than you may believe I had the same mindset as you until recently.
84K3R80I 1 year ago
@DigbyCat so is your mum.
GunFactory09 1 year ago
@DigbyCat so's yah mum you backward fuck. go fist your bum
GunFactory09 1 year ago
@DigbyCat well I see where you're coming from, but I must say everybody keeps using the insulation disaster against the government, when in actual fact it would have worked had the system not been taken advantage of by greedy people. A lot of people became 'insulation installers' overnight and ripped pensioners and other people off, did crappy jobs that lead to tragic deaths. The system was made a bit too easy to be abused, for sure, but it was greedy lowlives who ruined it for us.
icequeen9 1 year ago
do you have room 4 20 million people?
YOUR KIDS WILL LOKK GR8 IN THIS!!!
mudbloodandproud1996 1 year ago 2
Gillard has officially sunk to an all time low - her credibility is ZERO, her corruption ABSOLUTE, her morality and ethics NON-EXISTENT.
The new, old, current Gillard is just a superficial wafer blowing in the political breeze.
nibblez1222 1 year ago
huh?..... oh i get it ,abbots a faggot YEAH TOTALLY i agree
xeltex 1 year ago 2
"i need you to get rid of this for me" and "enough tim" - classic!
63blessed 1 year ago 2
@DigbyCat I'm pretty sure she's not allowing more boat people. She herself said she wants a controlled and sustainable Australian population, and that she's not for a bigger Australia.
nathandailo 1 year ago
@nathandailo do you have any idea of the actual numbers of boat people entering the country. Its fuck all. Just media blowing it out of proportion for racist australia to get all hyped about.
GunFactory09 1 year ago
lmao! I think that was better than her real adds. Because i dont have to ask myself 'is this bitch for real.
6023Nath 1 year ago
I'm just going to vote Green.
The more greens in the house, the less of a see-saw between the two-opposing parties.
At least then there will be a balance of interests. Besides- I don't want to see someone so staunchly opposed to my freedom as Abbott leading the country.
At least with the Greens, we'll have SOME socially forward people representing us. Not to mention the only party who is TRULY concerned with the environment- not just trying to shoo it under the carpet.
Treemeadow 1 year ago 9
@Treemeadow You know a lot of green votes apparently roll over to Labor. That might not be a bad thing, I don't know how you feel, I just thought I should mention it. But Greens aside, we definitely need to keep our independents in so that things run smoother in parliament! Yay the tipping power of the minority!
icequeen9 1 year ago
@icequeen9 It only rolls over if you place Labor as your next preference and Greens don't get in.
So if you vote Green, and put oh- Shooters Party as your next pref. Greens don't get in- it goes to Shooters, shooters don't get in, then it goes to the next.
So if you put Liberal as yours after Green- it'll go to liberal *gag*
I'm not keen on Labor OR Liberal. I'm going Greens and Independants.
Treemeadow 1 year ago
@Treemeadow right, because it's so comforting to have people who prefer animal and environmental life over human life, have no idea how things actually affect the environment and tell us that "Everyone must make sacrifices" when they're the ones living comfortably wealthy lives in the cities. Black Saturday? Yeah, the only reason that was half as devastating as it was was because idiots like the greens wouldn't allow backburning or even let people clear trees on their own property...
silfuryn 1 year ago
@silfuryn As somebody who lived in heavily wooded area for almost 10 years, I know that it's the CFA that dictates and regulates back burning. It's left to their better judgement. Not in the hands of bureaucrats in the cities. Don't act like Bob Brown was sitting on everybody's doorstep syphoning the fluid from people's lighters. Nonsense like this just pisses me off.
HowDyaYouLikeMeNow 1 year ago 2
@Treemeadow I understand this is an old post, but i feel this is relevant (also the chaser's) watch?v=AtXBgiubnK8&feature=feedf
LJW943 1 year ago
@Treemeadow How is Tony Abbott opposed to your freedom? how will getting more greens in the house restore balance to the house? they'll just side with Labor anyway.
And the greens are anything but socially forward.
sstuddert 1 year ago
Tony Abbott is opposed to my being able to marry the person I love.
In the House- there are seats representing each party. The house with the most seats gets the most sway over decisions, because they vote on everything. With more Labor- the votes lean labor. With more Liberal, they lean liberal. With Green, it balances them out.
And do you even know what socially forward means? It means anti-discrimination- and they are the least discriminatory of all the parties.
Treemeadow 1 year ago
@TreemeadowIn case you're an absolute moron, I think I should just remind you again that the greens are socially incompetent and, for this reason, they will only ever have enough seats to give their preferences to labor. Secondly, it is most definitely a good thing that power will either sway one way or the other, that's what an election is for, not to determine who is "sort of in power" but to determine who is undeniably in power.
sstuddert 1 year ago
Yes, let's throw insults now, how mature of you.
Treemeadow 1 year ago
@sstuddert
Need I remind you- you threw the first insult. So, when it comes to attacks, I think its a case of the pot calling the kettle black.
Treemeadow 1 year ago
@Treemeadow Furthermore, Tony Abbott and the liberal party aren't the only one's opposed to same sex marriage, so are Julia Gillard and the labor party. In anycase, marriage isn't important in a relationship, it is just a petty ceremony and a document saying "these two people are now recognised as being joined in that abstract, earthly and pointless thing we call 'marriage'" - whether you're gay or straight, marriage is pointless so there are far more important things to be worrying about.
sstuddert 1 year ago
You must be completely naive if you think marriage has no benefit. If I had a partner in another country, I couldn't have her immigrate like a married couple could. If she was sick and dying in hospital- I would be at the mercy of the administrators, because there are no requirements to allow de-facto partners in wards, like married couples.
Furthermore- Gillard is not opposed to Marriage in the long term. She has no religious opposition to it, like Abbott. With G, it could happen, A- no way.
Treemeadow 1 year ago
@Treemeadow day people can still have civil unions.
sstuddert 1 year ago
@sstuddert
Not in this country. The most we have is recognition of partnership- which is FAR below even Civil Union Wow, you really shouldn't argue without doing your research first...and you know what? Even if they DID have civil unions- ALL people have the right to be self-determined. Why can't gay people marry the people they love? More than half of Australia's population are for Gay-marriage. Shouldn't our government be listening to us? Abbott won't.
Treemeadow 1 year ago
@Treemeadow *gay.
sstuddert 1 year ago
@Treemeadow oh, and it is far less naive and immature of me to throw insults than it is of you to support the greens.
sstuddert 1 year ago
@sstuddert
And congratulations- you officially lost this argument with your petty "I know you are but what am I" taunting.
I mean, really? Come on- thats got to be the worst comeback in history. You remind me of the children I teach everyday "nah nah nah nah nah" stuff.
Grow up, young one.
Treemeadow 1 year ago
@Treemeadow abbott won't, neother will gillard, stop being a biased bitch. And by the way, you officially lost this argument long ago when you said you supported the greens.
sstuddert 1 year ago
@sstuddert
Thankyou so much for showing Australia what sort of quality you Liberal supporters are bred from. Swearing, ignorant, old fashioned-
Hey everybody! Isn't this guy such a *fine* representation of what Liberal is all about? Swearing, using language offensive to women, poor spelling and ignorance of political and social matters?
Get off the computer, young troll, and go back to school.
Treemeadow 1 year ago
@Treemeadow offensive to women? firstly, I thought you were a man, secdondly, please don't start with that "femenist" nonsense, it's tasteless enough to support the greens.
sstuddert 1 year ago
@sstuddert
Your spelling is atrocious, get off the internet and go back to school, young troll.
Treemeadow 1 year ago
@Treemeadow So, you're nothing but a simple pedant. Why didn't you say so in the first place? I may not have wasted my time.
sstuddert 1 year ago
@sstuddert
Trolling, you mean? Trolling is always a waste of time.
Treemeadow 1 year ago
@Treemeadow ...no... not trolling... just talking to you...
sstuddert 1 year ago
@sstuddert
Well, if your definition of "talking" includes crude insults and ignorance of current Political practice while arguing, then you need a new dictionary.
Treemeadow 1 year ago
@Treemeadow I'm politicaly ignorant? that's a bit rich comming from someone who supports the greens.
sstuddert 1 year ago
@sstuddert
Same old arguments, don't you think of anything new? Are you really so lost for stuff to back up your pseudo-argument?
Just admit it, troll, I caught you out.
Treemeadow 1 year ago
@Treemeadow I don't need "anything new", I don't have to keep changing the subject - My original argument is still solid. Meanwhile, you have to keep trying to bring up new ones, each time becoming more pedantic and pathetic and, finally, desperately predictable by accusing me of being a troll - a common last resort for people who can't accept they are wrong.
sstuddert 1 year ago
@sstuddert
I'm not the one who refuses to come up with a better argument than "your a green, duh, you suck"
So, my bad- I didn't realise that was the standard for political discussion. I assumed you were a troll because of it.
Treemeadow 1 year ago
@Treemeadow Please, don't lecture other people about the "standard for political discussion", for your own sake.
sstuddert 1 year ago
@sstuddert
OK, now you're just answering for answerings sake. You just want the last word because you're jealous I got more thumbs ups than you. Thats really what it's all about, isn't it?
Seriously, though, why are you wasting your time on this? You're obviously a troll.
Treemeadow 1 year ago
@Treemeadow I'm obviously a troll? I thought I already addressed that pathetic statement for you.
Secondly, Jealous? sorry, another terrible cliche' - "they're only teasing me because they're jealous etc...."
grow up, tapeworm.
sstuddert 1 year ago
You strike me as being one of those induviduals who always harp on about THEY'RE interests in conversation. I bet you're socially awkward and don't get out much, either.
Thats a shame. Perhaps you'd learn a thing or too about the world- particularily one area that involves how to accept people who think differently from you- but judging from your Channel page, I doubt thats an area of great familiarity to you, so I'll let it slide.
Treemeadow 1 year ago
Tonys about direct action im about acting directly...there not the same thing att alll..i think she should be blonde..
iluvguys21 1 year ago
haha LOVE this!
elementalistqueen 1 year ago
Charging for pollution. That's stupid. It won't help anything. Companies will be charged more and those costs get passed down to us.
Maybe if we didn't waste millions of dollars on unnecessary crap like internet filters and failed insulation schemes, we could invest in green energy.
captaind81 1 year ago
@captaind81 its simply an incentive for big polluters to become more efficient. and better than nothing at all
GunFactory09 1 year ago
A lot of would you like a cup of coffee and talk about climate change what excites them rightist challenge that it combines we can lead the country to the they say will like that company that us group all of the climate revolution you have rented twenty million people of all the time of the revolution united states and thanks the car and gene i not a problem on the ticket the storm with tiny depict action on that didn't exactly team o'brien.
what he's the prosecution's case.
Sifinland 1 year ago
@DigbyCat then I guess your the same. The coalition could abolish universal health care, destroy the environment for profit, sell off every state owned asset for pennies in the dollar and make university education only for the rich............But you'd still vote for them.
1dschamp 1 year ago
@DigbyCat so you're voting for Hitler then?
1dschamp 1 year ago 11
Australia is like mcdonalds now because it's run by a read headed clown
dirkstyle619 1 year ago 2
look at all the imbiciles come to argue over politics in the comment section. how pathetic.
AbbeyIncorporated 1 year ago
wat ev dont really care bout this vid soo lets like talk about ah climate change and how boring it is to kids :D :)
cutiegoescrazy 1 year ago
"Enough, Tim!"
ccsrobot 1 year ago
Everyone says she stabbed Rudd in the back... I think she did what no other man was willing to do and that is stand up to a politcal tyrannt. Rudd was nothing more than a bully who would not let anyone make a suggestion and any suggestions that were any good became his ideas. I for one dont want a PM that is a bully and an opourtunist. As for Gillard...yes she's female...yes she's a ranga....and yes she has bigger balls than anyone else by a long shot.
Infinityroseplus 1 year ago
blahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
bloodgoast 1 year ago
That actress is hotter than the real Gillard that's for sure.
No wonder she's not married.
NathanKlo 1 year ago
Comment removed
tbag2640 1 year ago
"Hello? Do you have room for twenty - million people?"
Makes me laugh every time ;]
StuffOnMyMobile 1 year ago
If more than 90% of scientists are wrong, then it would be even more worrying than climage change, but the fact is that global warming hasn't been debunked by anyone except in the minds of those who are unwilling to accept what is in many respects a reality.
1nown 1 year ago
I love the look on his face when she hands him the knife :D
AlbionLegend 1 year ago
Flip around in. BAHAHAHA!
TheMojore 1 year ago
do you have room for 20 million people? LOL
cheeriosryum 1 year ago
Hellooo! Is this Nauru??!
apowlesland 1 year ago
I'm Australian and ashamed that we haven't made a move on carbon tax. INDIA has just put in place a carbon tax! Read BusinessWeek. So they can do it but we're too gutless. Oh wait, I know, after the third world becomes a mess of climate refugees, the climate problem goes away. Now it's a refugee problem and we all know that's easy to solve.
foiblebear 1 year ago 2
@foiblebear Right wing racist fuck.
GunFactory09 1 year ago
The actress playing Gillard is far too attractive to be playing her. XD
I'm voting for the libertarian Greens.
Labor and the Liberials are the same crappy neo-cons in different clothing.
Gillard and Abbott should find a room... and get locked in it.
kalidesu 1 year ago