@dcsensui Japan was hit with the HAARP! By the American government!!
And they are going to be hit again with an earthquake very soon!! Japan is not doing what America wants them to do! More earthquakes, tsunamis, very bad weather for the globe! Through the use of HAARP! Food shortages!! Microchip for all 2012! Depopulation is taking place now! Michio is a FREEMASON HE IS ONE OF THEM! RESEARCH THIS. He works for Nasa!! Nasa is run by the ILLUMINATI! He is not what you think he is!
Oh well yes, pursuing nuclear power as our energy alternative is clearly worth the risk. It's not like if something happens to go wrong the whole planet is in danger. Let's built more!
@Snoot501 although I love renewables like wind solar, nuclear is still a much much better alternative to coal and oil. It just needs to be set up much safely.
@Ponthegan You are DAMN RIGHT! You people need to back off on Dr Kaku. Because I think that you need to cleanse your brains or something, because I don't feel that your neurons are grasping the fact that a THEORY is a HYPOTHESIS!!!! No confirmed, well in some cases it is, but you need to get my point, peeps. This is coming from a 12 year old kid, Like SERIOUSLY, accept new ideas. Like, what Ponthegan said: Stop sticking your damn heads in the sand, like ostriches.
When Kaku did this interview, Japan was declaring a "level 5" emergency. Kaku said it was a "level 7." Today, that's exactly where it is. And the evacuation distance was also increased.
Japan has to stop goofing around with this. As Kaku recommended, bury it. Or risk losing a huge chunk of the surrounding countryside for generations, and poisoning the nearby sea.
@watisupdood sorry, are you a nuclear physicist? a nuclear engineer perhaps? If you think that this is how a scientist responsibly tells people the ' truth' then you have been watching/reading irresponsible reporting.
Please SAVE JAPAN, the PEOPLE and the OCEAN from TEPCO!!! TOKYO, you should come out protesting against TEPCO dumping into our oceans.
How much an oil tanker cost? All oil tankers should sail to the approximate location and stand by. We are going to buy your tankers if they are appropriate for this.
I suspected that the earthquake in Christchurch may lead to an aftershock that would trigger another earthquake, and said so at the time to friends. If I could make that prediction without any knowledge of seismology, how could TEPCO risk running their power stations at 100% operation following the New Zealand disaster when say 60% or 70% for two weeks would have been sensible?
"a car without brakes and then the radiator explodes". Because you're really in trouble if your engine overheats just before you crash into a truck at 80mph?
Hmm, this guy doesn't seem to have much expertise in either power stations or OR cars.
Greenpeace activists were all these years ignorantly talking about how dangerous nuclear is, it's a disaster waiting to happen (and anything else that scares them). Then we replied "no, no, it's safe, statistically". And now their warnings came true and I'm not saying anything other than "oh, no". I was also drinking sake that day, I looked on wiki just to see the big news and I got really the biggest news. Oh snap! Lets just hope it won't poison the fish. Tuna is already too poisonous to eat.
I will echo that Kaku is not an expert in this field, and if it sounds like he's fear-mongering and exaggerating, it's because he is. He is a long-time vocal activist for nuclear non-proliferation (see tinyurl 6cdfvbk for excerpts of a 2008 interview where he advocates for complete ban on nuclear power on Earth) and it is irresponsible for both him and ABC to not make clear his political bias.
@SamuelRiv "Political bias"? When a nuclear plant releases radiation, and someone who opposes nuclear plants because they are concerned about releases of radiation then goes and points out that there is a huge danger of that plant releasing more radiation, it becomes rather inane to accuse them of "political bias".
Seems to me that hidden political bias rests with the idiot who claims that an anti-nuclear activist who dares comment upon a real life nuclear accident is acting innappropriately.
@SamuelRiv Missed it at first, but you also contradicted yourself almost openly (while twisting logic into a pretzel by accusing him of "political bias" in relation to a politically significant event); calling Kaku both "a long-time vocal activist for nuclear non-proliferation" & somehow, "not an expert in this field". The activists I know - especially "long-term", vocal ones - make it their moral imperative to educate themselves on their issue anyway; but Kaku happens to be a physicist as well.
We are talking inducement not impacting like Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Radiation poisioning does get into lungs, etc, and one starts the dying which is whats happening when we are born. But, this is different in the time allowed humans reproduce.Birth defects spike, medical bills, and long term care happens to some communities more than others.Here in Hawaii we have military spread of nuclear isotopes in every community that is at cause for many deaths. But, they are too many variables for truth.
@tutt99 He is anti nuclear? I wonder why. Let's see: 3 Mile Island, Chernobyl deaths from leukemia and other cancers, and now this, the question is why are you *defending* such a terrible and dangerous technology? You like genocide?
@man4Sam I don't think anyone's particulary fond of nuclear fission power. Except from some share holders perhaps ;-) The problem is that we really do not have any good alternatives at hand. And even if we did it would be impossible to make the transition over night. I am frustrated with Greenpeace and other opportunists who shout "death to nuclear". They seem to be more interested in short term publicity than actually changing the world. Present realistic scenarios and people will listen.
@buugiman78 The problem is, nobody in power is BOTHERING to "make the transition" at all. (The Australian government recently let a solar panel manufacturer die by denying promised funding, while coal & oil still get massive subsidies over alternative R&D.) Nuclear is not a "necessary evil" - it can be phased out in countries that have it, and places like Australia never developed it in the first place.
The lack of alternatives isn't a fact of nature - it's a political choice.
@dalellll Yes it's a travesty we don't spend more money on alternative energy! For many reasons! Still, I think nuclear fission is a necessary evil in the short term. It would be insane to close down all the nuclear reactors in the world over night. I just don't think we should light-heartedly build new ones without seriously considering the alternatives. Which unfortunately isn't always the case today. At least not in my native country Finland. A world free from nuclear fission in 2040?
@buugiman78 Oh, I don't think anyone's suggesting to shut them down overnight - what can be done is the energy use of industry can be assessed, and unnecessary use cut down, & alternatives brought in to feed the grids (Japan has a special problem with their various regional grids being incompatible - some run on 60Hz, some on 50Hz) at the same rate that power from the reactors is reduced. The existence of the plants will still be a problem for a long time after they're decommissioned. :(
@man4Sam I like Michio Kaku,but the poster IS right.
"He is grabbing the spotlight (again) for his own personal benefit.He is openly anti nuclear. and using the crisis to further that agenda." Let see,you said,"why are you *defending* such a terrible and dangerous technology?" Because it's the cleanest working technology we have to date,maybe the poster works in the nuclear industry and has more knowledge of what goes on than you,or Michio Kaku.
Nuclear reactors are a problem waiting to happen. If a meterorite the size of Manhattan hits our planet, it would destroy all of these reactors releasing deadly radiation that would wipe all life on earth. And there is no place to store the radioactive waste. Nuclear energy is just not worth the rest to our world.
none of you slow thinkers will ever turn us from science ever, go complain about your coffee being gone cold, if you think your smarter or better fix the problem, and stop berating a man that is trying to help, if you don't like what is said start your own site, and give up heaping shit on the ones that are willing too, you have no guts or heart, go hide under your rock. good on you and keep it up Dr. Michio Kaku and thank you
Boy, it's trendy to parlay your high school physics class and your dime-a-dozen conservative-skepticism into a rant against a capable theoretical physicist discussing a real-life disaster whose serious implications should be obvious to a five-year-old. OMG, I MUST BE READING YOUTUBE COMMENTS!
hi man just i thought is there any thing you could mix with the stuff the rods are made of something like diamond dust and put it in a mold and shock fused like the way they combine say steel and say brass by setting of a small explosive that forces the two too fuse as one i know you guys might of thought about that but i do know some times you need an uneducated look i don't know just felt like saying something
I thought this was actually NO WHERE NEAR being like Chernobyl...
Japan is no where as irresponsible enough to build anything like that. Not to mention this was caused by an EARTHQUAKE not a bunch of idiots. Even now despite battling mother nature the Japanese have managed to keep it under control. The reason radiation got out there, like he said, is because the roof blew open.. I fail to see other than this having to do with 'nuclear energy' how this remotely relates to Chernobyl Dr Kaku
@Caprican28 "Japan is no where as irresponsible enough to build anything like that. Not to mention this was caused by an EARTHQUAKE not a bunch of idiots."
Unfortunately, earthquakes are things that happen in the Real World, and some "bunch of idiots", at some point in the recent past, decided to build large nuclear reactors in one of the most earthquake-prone regions on the planet. It's no less "idiotic" than what happened at Chernobyl.
bbc said the core was contained and fuel rods were intact, it was the cooling system that blew, still building up pressure and they were pumping sea water in to keep it cool,mild radioactivity where you say we don't know about core damage. But surely sea water could also absorb radioactivity the same as the cooling water/steam and would contaminate the sea?
But they did show a petrochemical complex on fire, a ship in the middle of a devastated town, and said a second reactor also had damage.
If you have no proper way to contain it the technology shouldn't be used. Same thing with the BP oil spill, destroying our life support systems because some chump thought the risks were worth it. Or didn't even think of the risks when they designed these "miracles of modern technology". When will people learn? Why can't we harness the energy from the sun, lightning or some other form that isn't unsafe. Mentality is we pop iodine pills when the fallout comes, always treatment and no cure.
Although serious the reactor containment building (The thing Chernobyl lacked) is still intact. The top half of the building is not a radiator. No nuclear reactor could be cooled with such a small condenser.
The upper structure is the containment buildings air condition and scrubbing equipment which is likely were they attempted to filter the pressure buildup before it blew up the filters. Although some radiation would be released it is still safe for now.
Dr Michio Kaku is one of the greatest minds left on the earth in my opinion. People like him should be saved instead of the mindless rich elite. Note no1 deserves to die. If i had a "ticket" like the mindless rich elite to survive after what ever it is that will do us all in, i would gladly give mine to Dr Kaku, known that people like him are far more important to society or mankind than the "elite" with there money and bought power inside the governments all over the world. FUK NEW WORLD ORDER
This situation and Chernobyl cannot be compared in the way he's doing.. There's no graphite to burn for weeks and lift radioactive material high into the strongest winds and the level of heat produced from the reactor core was 6% of operational emission (as far as I've understood) and declining, unlike Chernobyl where the core itself was getting hotter; that is not happening here. The reactors are very differently constructed, and the Chernobyl explosion was due to a design error not found here.
I can imagine the producers line of thought! "Well, you know that japanese looking guy who talks about particles and stuff. Would it not be great to have him on the air talking about the current events in Japan". Nevermind the fact that he is NOT an expert on nuclear power plant safety nor japanese. It is so ridiculous. I have to confess I am quite fed up with Michio Kaku. He is a first class attention whore saying whatever any ignorant audience wants to hear! This interview is truelly absurd!
While Mr. Kaku is a recognized expert in theoretical physics, I'd think more highly of an actual nuclear engineer's assessment. Kaku's assessment seems too full of conjecture and worst possible scenarios.
@hopprich I wouldn't trust someone who's on the nuke business' payroll with their history of reporting in these kinds of situations. Not ONCE, in the history of nukes, has the whole truth been told.
@hopprich You're the type of person who will hang on every word when a celebrity talks about politiccs, but when a politician is actually speaking, you rather watch a lame Justin Bieber video. -Matthew Viramontes
@hopprich He is a nuclear Physisist dude he has been around as an Expert, even on the still ongoing threat of Three mile Island to restart. He was also an expert during the initial accident of Three mile island. Sorry to Melt Down your bubble dude. But he is world renoun Nuclear Physicist. He covers the truth of nuclear accidents and has for over 20 years
Dr. Michio Kacu is one of the smartest men on this planet because he can explain something extremely complicated and make it understandable to the masses.
@mrpablo82 Nevermind the irrelevant fact that what he is saying often is vastly misleading and that he is often not representing actual science. But, hey! Who cares as long as he is entertaining...
@buugiman78 okay, so if you're smarter than do something about it.... and obviously you care enough to comment about miss "vastly misleading science." :)
Since you're smart enough not to mislead us in the scientific world, I will be looking out for your videos on youtube explaining the complicated world of science.
@mrpablo82 Did I say I was smarter than Michio Kaku? I said he's often stretching the truth in order to gain publicity. For example talking about time travelling as a theoretical possibility in the future although he knows perfectly well there's no evidence suggesting anything such. He can make any claims he want to. The problem is that he portrays himself as a serious scientist while not representing serious science. I am a bit amused that the only response you could think of was ad hominen ;-)
@buugiman78 How can someone be "stretching the truth" when it's, as you said he is doing, explaining it as a theory .... which is an abstract thought. Theories are just theories.
I love ad hominen attacks. They make me happy ; ) hahahaha
@mrpablo82 No, scientific theories are not "just theories"! That is a grave misunderstanding. You are talking about theories in the everyday sense of the word. The scientific equivalence would be an unsubstantiated hypothesis. A scientific theory is always backed up with lots and lots of facts. A theory is as good as it gets. That's the gold standard. But perhaps you think the germ theory for example is "just a theory" as well ;-)
@buugiman78 This can go on for days... and I really don't care to do so. I like Dr. Michio Kaku, but not enough to defend him and his theories. This conversation got drab 6 comments ago.
@buugiman78 uh, if you know anything about special and general relativity, time travel technically happens all the time... not in the time machine sense, but it's real. Look up how GPSes work. There's no reason to not think that the more and more our technology progresses, the closer we'll get to time travel in a practical sense. Then there's theoretical stuff that general relativity predicted, like black holes, that turned out to be true. It's right about a lot of things so it could very well..
China syndrome - where the reactor just keeps melting through the core of the earth and reaches the other side. I think in Japan's case, it should be "Brazil syndrome."
I appreciate that nit-picking nerds on the Internet are usually somewhere on the Autism Spectrum, and thus don't grasp more human, social concerns, but the comparison to Chernobyl is quite clearly relevant when talking about the long-term social and epidemiological effects of this on human beings.
I have PhD in Nuclear Engineering with a concentration in Health Physics. I currently work as a risk analysis for a nuclear power facility. I am hardly a nit picking nerd.
@tuttt99 Dude, you're *obviously* a nitpicking nerd. You just responded to a comparison to Chernobyl by making a list of reasons that the sequence of events didn't match Chernobyl, while completely ignoring the possibility that there were other measures on which a comparison to Chernobyl would be useful. It's the very definition of nitpicking nerdery.
@tuttt99 Pardon my dude. You may have qualifications, but that doesn't give you a free pass saying stuff that's incorrect. (As a geologist, i know many "experts" on the issue whose opinion I'd trust far less than most, because I know how they get their funding.) I know quite a lot about the issue, and so do many others who would agree with Kaku's sentiments.
It's worrying that after i attacked your specific criticism of Kaku, you could only respond by citing credentials. That's not science.
Plants need to be built near the water. Many plants are built on the ocean. In California, San Onofre is built right on the ocean and is only built to withstand a 7.0.
Well, to be honest, Japan was stupid to have built it so close to the ocean. They should have built it much farther inland and this could have been avoided. Guess we always have to learn the hard way...
@DvineGaming get your facts right first: the wind is blowing west to east -> poisinous air blows on the ocean and not on cities and land farther east. Nuclear facilities need enormous amounts of cooling water (kaku mantoned that) -> easier to get that amounts on the shore. Exactly because of the ever existing threat of an earthquake, Japan's security standards for nuclear sites are obove international average.
@Crazyrudie Why do they have to be? Couldn't you just, gee IDK run water to it? You don't HAVE to. Chernobyl was no where near water and it was a working reactor. It went into meltdown for reasons other than it not being near water so why don't you explain why it has to be near water rather than being a keyboard warrior and acting like a total faggot?
@DvineGaming Chernobyl was nowhere near water? Seriously?!? It was build on the shore of an artificial lake. It was nowhere near the *ocean*, true, but it was definitely near water.
(Also, the Chernobyl plant used graphite as a moderator whereas the Fukushima plant uses deuterium-depleted [light] water. Different properties; different designs; not the same animal. What works for one will not necessarily work for the other.)
@kestaa OK, but I would still like to hear why they have to be built near water, you haven't answered that. And yes I know modern reactors use deuterium gas in the reaction chamber. No modern fusion reactor has ever had a meltdown but there is a first for everything.
fusion reactor FTW
GunnyZoSo 1 month ago 2
Fukushima Reactor still ‘Insufficient,'.
RedSkyNord 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos
This has been flagged as spam show
WORLD RECORD: BIGGEST WIND TURBINE
Visit: windturbinecarriedbywheels.weebly.com
ZERO-NOISE from gears and generators since they are sealed underground.
SAVES THE BIRDS AND BATS since slow-moving.
DOES NOT NEED TO OCCUPY A WIDER LANDSCAPE since the turbine can be very tall.
MAY BE LOWER-COST since it may use timber and other cheaper things.
ELUDES HURRICANE FORCE since the blades automatically close.
NO FIRE since well-cooled.
HELPS THE WIND ENERGY COMPANIES since it is FREE FOR ALL.
TheServiceWeb 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WORLD RECORD: BIGGEST WIND TURBINE
Visit: windturbinecarriedbywheels.weebly.com
ZERO-NOISE from gears and generators since they're sealed underground.
SAVES THE BIRDS AND BATS since the turbines are slow-moving.
DOES NOT NEED TO OCCUPY A WIDER LANDSCAPE since the turbine can be very tall.
MAY BE LOWER-COST since it can use parts of junked trucks and others.
ELUDES HURRICANE FORCE since the blades automatically close.
HELPS THE WIND ENERGY COMPANIES since it is FREE FOR ALL.
TheServiceWeb 1 month ago
dammmm nature you scary!
7juaninho7 1 month ago
@dcsensui Japan was hit with the HAARP! By the American government!!
And they are going to be hit again with an earthquake very soon!! Japan is not doing what America wants them to do! More earthquakes, tsunamis, very bad weather for the globe! Through the use of HAARP! Food shortages!! Microchip for all 2012! Depopulation is taking place now! Michio is a FREEMASON HE IS ONE OF THEM! RESEARCH THIS. He works for Nasa!! Nasa is run by the ILLUMINATI! He is not what you think he is!
SahMai 2 months ago
@SahMai HAARP? Wasnt that a program with an artillery peice?
..so you're blaming guns for this? you must be anti-gun
Keinlicht 1 month ago
BUNCH OF IDIOTS!! He is a FREEMASO!! He works for the illuminati! Research this!
He is paid to make up shit by Nasa! Nasa is run by the illuminate right from day one!
YOU PEOPLE WILL NEVER WAKE UP!
He is one of them! He is part of the New World Order!
SahMai 2 months ago
so this is how zombies came to be..
blackoni373 2 months ago
He is beeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeest <333333333333
LiborTichy77 6 months ago
Oh well yes, pursuing nuclear power as our energy alternative is clearly worth the risk. It's not like if something happens to go wrong the whole planet is in danger. Let's built more!
Snoot501 7 months ago
@Snoot501 although I love renewables like wind solar, nuclear is still a much much better alternative to coal and oil. It just needs to be set up much safely.
curingaging00 5 months ago
@Ponthegan You are DAMN RIGHT! You people need to back off on Dr Kaku. Because I think that you need to cleanse your brains or something, because I don't feel that your neurons are grasping the fact that a THEORY is a HYPOTHESIS!!!! No confirmed, well in some cases it is, but you need to get my point, peeps. This is coming from a 12 year old kid, Like SERIOUSLY, accept new ideas. Like, what Ponthegan said: Stop sticking your damn heads in the sand, like ostriches.
Poseidon3987 8 months ago
When Kaku did this interview, Japan was declaring a "level 5" emergency. Kaku said it was a "level 7." Today, that's exactly where it is. And the evacuation distance was also increased.
Japan has to stop goofing around with this. As Kaku recommended, bury it. Or risk losing a huge chunk of the surrounding countryside for generations, and poisoning the nearby sea.
dcsensui 10 months ago
@watisupdood sorry, are you a nuclear physicist? a nuclear engineer perhaps? If you think that this is how a scientist responsibly tells people the ' truth' then you have been watching/reading irresponsible reporting.
MaBuSt 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Please SAVE JAPAN, the PEOPLE and the OCEAN from TEPCO!!! TOKYO, you should come out protesting against TEPCO dumping into our oceans.
How much an oil tanker cost? All oil tankers should sail to the approximate location and stand by. We are going to buy your tankers if they are appropriate for this.
beancube2010 10 months ago
I suspected that the earthquake in Christchurch may lead to an aftershock that would trigger another earthquake, and said so at the time to friends. If I could make that prediction without any knowledge of seismology, how could TEPCO risk running their power stations at 100% operation following the New Zealand disaster when say 60% or 70% for two weeks would have been sensible?
inspectorcrud 10 months ago
"a car without brakes and then the radiator explodes". Because you're really in trouble if your engine overheats just before you crash into a truck at 80mph?
Hmm, this guy doesn't seem to have much expertise in either power stations or OR cars.
XPLAlN 11 months ago
Greenpeace activists were all these years ignorantly talking about how dangerous nuclear is, it's a disaster waiting to happen (and anything else that scares them). Then we replied "no, no, it's safe, statistically". And now their warnings came true and I'm not saying anything other than "oh, no". I was also drinking sake that day, I looked on wiki just to see the big news and I got really the biggest news. Oh snap! Lets just hope it won't poison the fish. Tuna is already too poisonous to eat.
StandingRedPanda 11 months ago
this is done by aliens ?oh my god
PLASMAVITY 11 months ago
I will echo that Kaku is not an expert in this field, and if it sounds like he's fear-mongering and exaggerating, it's because he is. He is a long-time vocal activist for nuclear non-proliferation (see tinyurl 6cdfvbk for excerpts of a 2008 interview where he advocates for complete ban on nuclear power on Earth) and it is irresponsible for both him and ABC to not make clear his political bias.
SamuelRiv 11 months ago
@SamuelRiv "Political bias"? When a nuclear plant releases radiation, and someone who opposes nuclear plants because they are concerned about releases of radiation then goes and points out that there is a huge danger of that plant releasing more radiation, it becomes rather inane to accuse them of "political bias".
Seems to me that hidden political bias rests with the idiot who claims that an anti-nuclear activist who dares comment upon a real life nuclear accident is acting innappropriately.
dalellll 11 months ago 2
@SamuelRiv Missed it at first, but you also contradicted yourself almost openly (while twisting logic into a pretzel by accusing him of "political bias" in relation to a politically significant event); calling Kaku both "a long-time vocal activist for nuclear non-proliferation" & somehow, "not an expert in this field". The activists I know - especially "long-term", vocal ones - make it their moral imperative to educate themselves on their issue anyway; but Kaku happens to be a physicist as well.
dalellll 11 months ago 2
This guy knows how to make panic...
PznRen 11 months ago
We are talking inducement not impacting like Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Radiation poisioning does get into lungs, etc, and one starts the dying which is whats happening when we are born. But, this is different in the time allowed humans reproduce.Birth defects spike, medical bills, and long term care happens to some communities more than others.Here in Hawaii we have military spread of nuclear isotopes in every community that is at cause for many deaths. But, they are too many variables for truth.
KaohiWaianae 11 months ago
What did he say at 1:57????
haha
Missionary117 11 months ago
What the hell did he say at 1:57????
Missionary117 11 months ago
I thought Chernobyl began with a chemical explosion. That would make it different to what's going on in Japan.
chopsueykungfu 11 months ago
Hey, its the master of the universe, Michio Kaku.(Sarcasm)
sleepless4201 11 months ago
@tutt99 He is anti nuclear? I wonder why. Let's see: 3 Mile Island, Chernobyl deaths from leukemia and other cancers, and now this, the question is why are you *defending* such a terrible and dangerous technology? You like genocide?
man4Sam 11 months ago
@man4Sam I don't think anyone's particulary fond of nuclear fission power. Except from some share holders perhaps ;-) The problem is that we really do not have any good alternatives at hand. And even if we did it would be impossible to make the transition over night. I am frustrated with Greenpeace and other opportunists who shout "death to nuclear". They seem to be more interested in short term publicity than actually changing the world. Present realistic scenarios and people will listen.
buugiman78 11 months ago
@buugiman78 The problem is, nobody in power is BOTHERING to "make the transition" at all. (The Australian government recently let a solar panel manufacturer die by denying promised funding, while coal & oil still get massive subsidies over alternative R&D.) Nuclear is not a "necessary evil" - it can be phased out in countries that have it, and places like Australia never developed it in the first place.
The lack of alternatives isn't a fact of nature - it's a political choice.
dalellll 11 months ago
@dalellll Yes it's a travesty we don't spend more money on alternative energy! For many reasons! Still, I think nuclear fission is a necessary evil in the short term. It would be insane to close down all the nuclear reactors in the world over night. I just don't think we should light-heartedly build new ones without seriously considering the alternatives. Which unfortunately isn't always the case today. At least not in my native country Finland. A world free from nuclear fission in 2040?
buugiman78 11 months ago
@buugiman78 Oh, I don't think anyone's suggesting to shut them down overnight - what can be done is the energy use of industry can be assessed, and unnecessary use cut down, & alternatives brought in to feed the grids (Japan has a special problem with their various regional grids being incompatible - some run on 60Hz, some on 50Hz) at the same rate that power from the reactors is reduced. The existence of the plants will still be a problem for a long time after they're decommissioned. :(
dalellll 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@man4Sam I like Michio Kaku,but the poster IS right.
"He is grabbing the spotlight (again) for his own personal benefit.He is openly anti nuclear. and using the crisis to further that agenda." Let see,you said,"why are you *defending* such a terrible and dangerous technology?" Because it's the cleanest working technology we have to date,maybe the poster works in the nuclear industry and has more knowledge of what goes on than you,or Michio Kaku.
OakIslandBandit 11 months ago
@man4Sam lol tuttt99 studies nuclear physics. good luck for him
chingychongo 11 months ago
Nuclear reactors are a problem waiting to happen. If a meterorite the size of Manhattan hits our planet, it would destroy all of these reactors releasing deadly radiation that would wipe all life on earth. And there is no place to store the radioactive waste. Nuclear energy is just not worth the rest to our world.
freedomfighterone 11 months ago
My eyes sense radiation all the time.
gamma rays and visible light are made of the same stuff.
attheveryend 11 months ago
none of you slow thinkers will ever turn us from science ever, go complain about your coffee being gone cold, if you think your smarter or better fix the problem, and stop berating a man that is trying to help, if you don't like what is said start your own site, and give up heaping shit on the ones that are willing too, you have no guts or heart, go hide under your rock. good on you and keep it up Dr. Michio Kaku and thank you
MrYendor1968 11 months ago
@MrYendor1968
He is NOT trying to help. He is grabbing the spotlight (again) for his own personal benefit.
He is openly anti nuclear. and using the crisis to further that agenda.
tuttt99 11 months ago
@tuttt99 Calm down
WorthCart 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Boy, it's trendy to parlay your high school physics class and your dime-a-dozen conservative-skepticism into a rant against a capable theoretical physicist discussing a real-life disaster whose serious implications should be obvious to a five-year-old. OMG, I MUST BE READING YOUTUBE COMMENTS!
dalellll 11 months ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
I agree with Dr. Michio Kaku.
vivattanaputi 11 months ago
I agree with Dr. Michio Kaku.
vivattanaputi 11 months ago
Michio Kaku 4 prez
iheartsteezeskiing 11 months ago
"runaway car with no brakes" Did Toyota build this nuclear plant.
ciberwarrior 11 months ago 3
@ciberwarrior Japanese did....
dinoz82 11 months ago
@ciberwarrior Actually, Hitachi built #4; GE built 1,2,and 5; and I can't recall the name of the company that build 3 and six.
attheveryend 11 months ago
hi man just i thought is there any thing you could mix with the stuff the rods are made of something like diamond dust and put it in a mold and shock fused like the way they combine say steel and say brass by setting of a small explosive that forces the two too fuse as one i know you guys might of thought about that but i do know some times you need an uneducated look i don't know just felt like saying something
MrYendor1968 11 months ago
I thought this was actually NO WHERE NEAR being like Chernobyl...
Japan is no where as irresponsible enough to build anything like that. Not to mention this was caused by an EARTHQUAKE not a bunch of idiots. Even now despite battling mother nature the Japanese have managed to keep it under control. The reason radiation got out there, like he said, is because the roof blew open.. I fail to see other than this having to do with 'nuclear energy' how this remotely relates to Chernobyl Dr Kaku
Caprican28 11 months ago 2
@Caprican28
He should shut up and get back to his book tour...
tuttt99 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Caprican28 "Japan is no where as irresponsible enough to build anything like that. Not to mention this was caused by an EARTHQUAKE not a bunch of idiots."
Unfortunately, earthquakes are things that happen in the Real World, and some "bunch of idiots", at some point in the recent past, decided to build large nuclear reactors in one of the most earthquake-prone regions on the planet. It's no less "idiotic" than what happened at Chernobyl.
dalellll 11 months ago
This is the most irresponsible piece of journalism I have ever heard in my life.
tuttt99 11 months ago
It's either too soon to make clever comments about the situation or it's too late.
hollywoodt00 11 months ago
MICHAEL KAKU?!
tokeabow 11 months ago
this remains me of fallout the science of games
HelghastSoldier1 11 months ago
WE'RE ALL DOOOOOOMED I TELL YA!!!!!!!
brochan11 11 months ago
kaku needs to real it back, hes scaring people for no reason other than views...
MaBuSt 11 months ago 2
@MaBuSt hes telling the news not scaring people
spenore 11 months ago
@MaBuSt man so stupid, look where its at now, he was write.
RhysMandala 10 months ago
@RhysMandala no, this is no where near what chernobyl was/is/continues to be.
Also, we were aware that there was going to be a hydrogen explosion.. this was not a surprise.
MaBuSt 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MaBuSt man so stupid, look where its at now, he was write.
RhysMandala 10 months ago
It's not going to be Chernobyl since there's nothing to burn.
There has to be fossil fuel which "aerosolize" the radioactive contamination. Frankly, hydrogen blast isn't enough.
Civsuccess2 11 months ago
Just pump the diesel from the unworking diesel generators to the coolant pipe.....
Than Kaboom....
Chernobyl will happen again.
Civsuccess2 11 months ago
if you all press 2-8-9 you hear: uranium actualy race against time xD
steam4o 11 months ago
bone cancer? ROFL
steam4o 11 months ago
@steam4o uh...you're only making it sound worse!! ;-)
ratje67 11 months ago
Can this have effect on the rest of the world?
SaiteK1911 11 months ago
bbc said the core was contained and fuel rods were intact, it was the cooling system that blew, still building up pressure and they were pumping sea water in to keep it cool,mild radioactivity where you say we don't know about core damage. But surely sea water could also absorb radioactivity the same as the cooling water/steam and would contaminate the sea?
But they did show a petrochemical complex on fire, a ship in the middle of a devastated town, and said a second reactor also had damage.
altrn8tiv 11 months ago
Comment removed
altrn8tiv 11 months ago
Comment removed
altrn8tiv 11 months ago
If you have no proper way to contain it the technology shouldn't be used. Same thing with the BP oil spill, destroying our life support systems because some chump thought the risks were worth it. Or didn't even think of the risks when they designed these "miracles of modern technology". When will people learn? Why can't we harness the energy from the sun, lightning or some other form that isn't unsafe. Mentality is we pop iodine pills when the fallout comes, always treatment and no cure.
gearlockT 11 months ago
I think we can be safe that EVERYTHING WILL BE SHIT FOREVER.
lashlashlashlashlash 11 months ago
Although serious the reactor containment building (The thing Chernobyl lacked) is still intact. The top half of the building is not a radiator. No nuclear reactor could be cooled with such a small condenser.
The upper structure is the containment buildings air condition and scrubbing equipment which is likely were they attempted to filter the pressure buildup before it blew up the filters. Although some radiation would be released it is still safe for now.
riakata 11 months ago
American production values and journalism are just awful.
Kevster1993 11 months ago
@Kevster1993 BBC based in the States.
chairde 11 months ago
@chairde The BBC is based pretty much everywhere, Including the states.
Kevster1993 11 months ago
@Kevster1993 It could be CBS but it looks like a BBC production to me.
chairde 11 months ago
NOTE Dr. Michio Kaku is a scientist and not a nuclear expert. but he has very high understanding the process of nuclear fusion not fission
nstockert 11 months ago
Dr Michio Kaku is one of the greatest minds left on the earth in my opinion. People like him should be saved instead of the mindless rich elite. Note no1 deserves to die. If i had a "ticket" like the mindless rich elite to survive after what ever it is that will do us all in, i would gladly give mine to Dr Kaku, known that people like him are far more important to society or mankind than the "elite" with there money and bought power inside the governments all over the world. FUK NEW WORLD ORDER
nstockert 11 months ago
Description says "Fukushima Daiichi I" is a tautology.
"Daiichi" means #1.
On the video:
I've always had mixed feelings on Nuclear plants.
But now I think the risks are probably not worth it.
CallMeMrNameless 11 months ago
@CallMeMrNameless
I think it's simply called a redundancy.
CallMeMrNameless 11 months ago
This situation and Chernobyl cannot be compared in the way he's doing.. There's no graphite to burn for weeks and lift radioactive material high into the strongest winds and the level of heat produced from the reactor core was 6% of operational emission (as far as I've understood) and declining, unlike Chernobyl where the core itself was getting hotter; that is not happening here. The reactors are very differently constructed, and the Chernobyl explosion was due to a design error not found here.
TheShortStory 11 months ago 2
I can imagine the producers line of thought! "Well, you know that japanese looking guy who talks about particles and stuff. Would it not be great to have him on the air talking about the current events in Japan". Nevermind the fact that he is NOT an expert on nuclear power plant safety nor japanese. It is so ridiculous. I have to confess I am quite fed up with Michio Kaku. He is a first class attention whore saying whatever any ignorant audience wants to hear! This interview is truelly absurd!
buugiman78 11 months ago 2
While Mr. Kaku is a recognized expert in theoretical physics, I'd think more highly of an actual nuclear engineer's assessment. Kaku's assessment seems too full of conjecture and worst possible scenarios.
hopprich 11 months ago 14
@hopprich I wouldn't trust someone who's on the nuke business' payroll with their history of reporting in these kinds of situations. Not ONCE, in the history of nukes, has the whole truth been told.
DoubleWW 11 months ago 2
@hopprich You're the type of person who will hang on every word when a celebrity talks about politiccs, but when a politician is actually speaking, you rather watch a lame Justin Bieber video. -Matthew Viramontes
itsMinuteMaid 11 months ago
@hopprich kaku, is talking in the the itnrest of japan, more scary more money more donations
ggHaSu 11 months ago
Comment removed
wolfgang8u 11 months ago
@hopprich He is a nuclear Physisist dude he has been around as an Expert, even on the still ongoing threat of Three mile Island to restart. He was also an expert during the initial accident of Three mile island. Sorry to Melt Down your bubble dude. But he is world renoun Nuclear Physicist. He covers the truth of nuclear accidents and has for over 20 years
wolfgang8u 11 months ago
Dr. Michio Kacu is one of the smartest men on this planet because he can explain something extremely complicated and make it understandable to the masses.
mrpablo82 11 months ago
@mrpablo82 Nevermind the irrelevant fact that what he is saying often is vastly misleading and that he is often not representing actual science. But, hey! Who cares as long as he is entertaining...
buugiman78 11 months ago 4
@buugiman78 okay, so if you're smarter than do something about it.... and obviously you care enough to comment about miss "vastly misleading science." :)
Since you're smart enough not to mislead us in the scientific world, I will be looking out for your videos on youtube explaining the complicated world of science.
mrpablo82 11 months ago
@mrpablo82 Did I say I was smarter than Michio Kaku? I said he's often stretching the truth in order to gain publicity. For example talking about time travelling as a theoretical possibility in the future although he knows perfectly well there's no evidence suggesting anything such. He can make any claims he want to. The problem is that he portrays himself as a serious scientist while not representing serious science. I am a bit amused that the only response you could think of was ad hominen ;-)
buugiman78 11 months ago
@buugiman78 How can someone be "stretching the truth" when it's, as you said he is doing, explaining it as a theory .... which is an abstract thought. Theories are just theories.
I love ad hominen attacks. They make me happy ; ) hahahaha
mrpablo82 11 months ago
@mrpablo82 No, scientific theories are not "just theories"! That is a grave misunderstanding. You are talking about theories in the everyday sense of the word. The scientific equivalence would be an unsubstantiated hypothesis. A scientific theory is always backed up with lots and lots of facts. A theory is as good as it gets. That's the gold standard. But perhaps you think the germ theory for example is "just a theory" as well ;-)
buugiman78 11 months ago 15
@buugiman78 You never know... he might prefer the evil spirit or witch theory of disease.
GaiusIuliusTaberna 11 months ago
@buugiman78 This can go on for days... and I really don't care to do so. I like Dr. Michio Kaku, but not enough to defend him and his theories. This conversation got drab 6 comments ago.
mrpablo82 11 months ago
@buugiman78 uh, if you know anything about special and general relativity, time travel technically happens all the time... not in the time machine sense, but it's real. Look up how GPSes work. There's no reason to not think that the more and more our technology progresses, the closer we'll get to time travel in a practical sense. Then there's theoretical stuff that general relativity predicted, like black holes, that turned out to be true. It's right about a lot of things so it could very well..
trtnec 11 months ago
@vivisect86 he look more like yoda.
MultiHypocrisy 11 months ago
they justinvited some weird hollywood asian-american actor
nazwa6 11 months ago
@nazwa6 Google is always a good friend. Don't you agree?
AsbjoernBrain 11 months ago
China syndrome has never been seen, only theorized... this could be history in the making though I'm not very exited to see it. =/
Truthiness231 11 months ago
China syndrome - where the reactor just keeps melting through the core of the earth and reaches the other side. I think in Japan's case, it should be "Brazil syndrome."
AtheistOnTheEdge 11 months ago
@AtheistOnTheEdge LOL, so true ^.^
China syndrome is a misnomer for the US, even more so for Japan.
Truthiness231 11 months ago
Comment removed
plejarenway 11 months ago
@plejarenway Well you say you're a prophet....make a prophecy beotch!
Indy1489 11 months ago
>physician
>reporter confirmed for retarded
xSkillzx 11 months ago
@xSkillzx Maybe you're the retarded one.
TheBigKiller 11 months ago
Comment removed
xSkillzx 11 months ago
I just realized that "china syndrome" only makes sense in north America.
brizihe 11 months ago
wow at the ultimate scaremongering Dr Kaku, Good Job
mil6es 11 months ago
kinda of a science celebrity now. if he was vain, he would wish for bad things like this to happen so he can get on tv
aKILLAfromAPK 11 months ago
"This could be a Chernobyl in the making" Thank God Michio Kaku remains level headed...
Phranky 11 months ago 66
@Phranky
The man has ZERO qualifications to speak about Nuclear Power, Much less Safety.
This is NOTHING like Chernobyl
Fukushima: Shut down and removing decay heat
Chernobyl: Prompt Criticality and thermal excursion at power
Fukushima: Containment structure intact
Chernobyl: no containment structure
Fukushima: Small amount of radioactivity released in light water steam
Chernobyl: Massive amounts of radioactivity released via burning graphite
tuttt99 11 months ago
@tuttt99 "This is nothing like Chernobyl"??
I appreciate that nit-picking nerds on the Internet are usually somewhere on the Autism Spectrum, and thus don't grasp more human, social concerns, but the comparison to Chernobyl is quite clearly relevant when talking about the long-term social and epidemiological effects of this on human beings.
dalellll 11 months ago
@dalellll
I have PhD in Nuclear Engineering with a concentration in Health Physics. I currently work as a risk analysis for a nuclear power facility. I am hardly a nit picking nerd.
tuttt99 11 months ago
@tuttt99 Dude, you're *obviously* a nitpicking nerd. You just responded to a comparison to Chernobyl by making a list of reasons that the sequence of events didn't match Chernobyl, while completely ignoring the possibility that there were other measures on which a comparison to Chernobyl would be useful. It's the very definition of nitpicking nerdery.
dalellll 11 months ago
@dalellll
First of all I am not a dude (I'm a girl)
Second, even if I am a nit picking nerd, my point is that I am MUCH more qualified to speak on nuclear safety than this pop celebrity.
tuttt99 11 months ago
@tuttt99
did you graduate 1st in your class from harvard like dr kaku...???
are getting millions of people to gain interest in science like dr kaku...???
are your books required reading in universities throughout the country like dr kaku...???
do your parents love you ...???
the answer to all of these questions is NO...so shut up bitch...!!!
thetruthis9 11 months ago 2
@thetruthis9 lets not be mean!!!
Missionary117 11 months ago
@tuttt99 Pardon my dude. You may have qualifications, but that doesn't give you a free pass saying stuff that's incorrect. (As a geologist, i know many "experts" on the issue whose opinion I'd trust far less than most, because I know how they get their funding.) I know quite a lot about the issue, and so do many others who would agree with Kaku's sentiments.
It's worrying that after i attacked your specific criticism of Kaku, you could only respond by citing credentials. That's not science.
dalellll 11 months ago
@tuttt99
pipe down you nit picking nerd.
peapodsss 11 months ago
@tuttt99
I am a nit picking nerd.
You work as a risk analyst. Not a risk analysis.
;) Keep up the good work, physics makes the world not break.
attheveryend 11 months ago
@attheveryend
Thanks. (I was very tired when I posted, hence the typo)
tuttt99 11 months ago
ermm....his just explaining common fact =,=
i wanna noe what can be done >.>
Lu5ck 11 months ago
Plants need to be built near the water. Many plants are built on the ocean. In California, San Onofre is built right on the ocean and is only built to withstand a 7.0.
strangeframe 11 months ago
1:58 HE SAYS SHIT hahaha
crazyasianskills 11 months ago
@crazyasianskills he said shoot
thrashaxe78 11 months ago
@thrashaxe78 Yeah i know haha but that isnt what it sounded like.
crazyasianskills 11 months ago
Thank you for keeping it real Dr. Michio Kaku
rdhaarpets 11 months ago 90
good news footage. good job. thank you.....
rdhaarpets 11 months ago
hey Im livin pretty close to chernobul! which sucks for me! but right it sucks for japanize people even more
jacobpaprotskiy 11 months ago
Comment removed
DvineGaming 11 months ago
Well, to be honest, Japan was stupid to have built it so close to the ocean. They should have built it much farther inland and this could have been avoided. Guess we always have to learn the hard way...
DvineGaming 11 months ago
@DvineGaming well it was built in the 70s
GreadyShady 11 months ago
@DvineGaming hindsight is 2020
endauthority 11 months ago
@DvineGaming get your facts right first: the wind is blowing west to east -> poisinous air blows on the ocean and not on cities and land farther east. Nuclear facilities need enormous amounts of cooling water (kaku mantoned that) -> easier to get that amounts on the shore. Exactly because of the ever existing threat of an earthquake, Japan's security standards for nuclear sites are obove international average.
addictedtopiano 11 months ago 2
@DvineGaming
You're a dumbass nuclear plants have to be built near water. Look at the ones in california
Crazyrudie 11 months ago
@Crazyrudie Why do they have to be? Couldn't you just, gee IDK run water to it? You don't HAVE to. Chernobyl was no where near water and it was a working reactor. It went into meltdown for reasons other than it not being near water so why don't you explain why it has to be near water rather than being a keyboard warrior and acting like a total faggot?
DvineGaming 11 months ago
@DvineGaming Chernobyl was nowhere near water? Seriously?!? It was build on the shore of an artificial lake. It was nowhere near the *ocean*, true, but it was definitely near water.
(Also, the Chernobyl plant used graphite as a moderator whereas the Fukushima plant uses deuterium-depleted [light] water. Different properties; different designs; not the same animal. What works for one will not necessarily work for the other.)
kestaa 11 months ago
@kestaa OK, but I would still like to hear why they have to be built near water, you haven't answered that. And yes I know modern reactors use deuterium gas in the reaction chamber. No modern fusion reactor has ever had a meltdown but there is a first for everything.
DvineGaming 11 months ago
@DvineGaming needs tons of water for everyday cooling
yurajaro 11 months ago
@yurajaro I know that but you could use a pipeline. Obviously it would be more expensive but far safer.
DvineGaming 11 months ago
@DvineGaming Eat a dick. If you're so interested due some fucking research dumbass.
Crazyrudie 11 months ago