You might "know the rules", but that hardly means that you are correct. Please see this indisputable picture evidence of your wrongness: search google for "Seems like a block in the back to me. Clearly."
Sorry to break it to you, but his left hand was never "on his front". And Hightower did not "turn as he was being blocked". The rule states that if a block is made with either hand on the back, then it is a block in the back, unless they were already touching his front. His left hand was not touching his front, it initially touched his back. Onto an ad hominem attack. W.R.T. your reliance on 'dumbass' -- I presume it is due to your subpar intellect from being reared by a gang of feral dogs.
Uh, what rule is that? He was *not* engaged with him already, so he is not allowed to block him in the back. And if either of your hands is on his back, then it is a block in the back. His left surely was. QED. So logically it was a block in the back. Who's the idiot now?
Maybe becasue all the refs are 30 yards away and see anything. This mean the box should review the play but oh wait the rules say that you can't just call a penalty after the play is done which retarded. So cheaters get away with cheating.
Fitzgerald came in from out of bounds to make the tackle which i only legal if he is forced out which he was not as he was in the back of the endzone when the rest of the players were way ahead of him
This play change everything. The Cardinals was too greedy, they should had just kick a FG, it would had be 10-10 instead of 20-7, & the Cardinals only lost by 4. This could had easily ended Cardinals 26 & Steelers 20, but that's what happen when you're greedy.
im a arizona cardinals fan it wasnt a hold man but it was stupid for kurt warner to throw it like that.. and NOT throw in backcorner for larry.. er... and @ Naddeob12 stfu we made it to the superbowl bitch dont try talkin smack after they made it that far.
@cookiez I completely agree- I love it wen announcers lose their composure like the Brandon stokely play
likeaboss8643 2 weeks ago
dont see anything rong with this
haters gonna hate
the only thing bad about this was the fact that the commentator DIDNT scream after that 100 yd td off an interception
zXCooKiezXz 2 months ago
wtf i saw a holding on kurt wanrner at 0;11
starbee11 8 months ago
clip on the 30 yard line by 56!
belairboy6 1 year ago
You might "know the rules", but that hardly means that you are correct. Please see this indisputable picture evidence of your wrongness: search google for "Seems like a block in the back to me. Clearly."
erikdw 2 years ago
Sorry to break it to you, but his left hand was never "on his front". And Hightower did not "turn as he was being blocked". The rule states that if a block is made with either hand on the back, then it is a block in the back, unless they were already touching his front. His left hand was not touching his front, it initially touched his back. Onto an ad hominem attack. W.R.T. your reliance on 'dumbass' -- I presume it is due to your subpar intellect from being reared by a gang of feral dogs.
erikdw 2 years ago
Uh, what rule is that? He was *not* engaged with him already, so he is not allowed to block him in the back. And if either of your hands is on his back, then it is a block in the back. His left surely was. QED. So logically it was a block in the back. Who's the idiot now?
erikdw 2 years ago
Comment removed
bonnieshan 2 years ago
Maybe becasue all the refs are 30 yards away and see anything. This mean the box should review the play but oh wait the rules say that you can't just call a penalty after the play is done which retarded. So cheaters get away with cheating.
phantom299 2 years ago
Yeah ok so when the refs say "blocking in the back" I guess they don't know the rules either.
phantom299 2 years ago
Lol at blocking in the back at 0:15 sec. GG free 7 points.
phantom299 2 years ago
How's that a block in the back when it's on the.. shoulder?
ITzBruJiN 2 years ago
Wow, do you know what a back is?
psusux1 2 years ago
Fitzgerald came in from out of bounds to make the tackle which i only legal if he is forced out which he was not as he was in the back of the endzone when the rest of the players were way ahead of him
Bigbadben7 2 years ago
They should've had an oxygen tank in the endzone waiting for him.
Turp28 2 years ago
tey did, it was funy
Windwave11 2 years ago
typical steelers play
tirpitz12 2 years ago
THAT WAS SO BEAST!!!
GO STEELERS!!!!
volpna 2 years ago
C'mon babay!!!
I will vote you for next season.
Even I would die after a 100yd rush, weighted 85kg.
GO STEELERS, I LOVE YOUR STEEL CURTAIN ver. 2.
GhostDogNo83 3 years ago
THATS WHY WE ARE THE #1 DEFENSE BABY!! GO STEELERS!!!! SIX-BURGH=STAIRWAY TO SEVEN--next year haha I LOVE THIS CITY
dano62778 3 years ago
This play change everything. The Cardinals was too greedy, they should had just kick a FG, it would had be 10-10 instead of 20-7, & the Cardinals only lost by 4. This could had easily ended Cardinals 26 & Steelers 20, but that's what happen when you're greedy.
GO STEELERS!
diamorious 3 years ago
there is a td phobea
mikeveda 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
10 seconds in right side of screen holding on kurt warner, the play ends at the penalty, no td
Phobea02140 3 years ago
lol your a pussy
Jason4678 3 years ago
your team is awful shouldnt of even been close see ya in another 75 years
naddeob12 3 years ago
And Kurt Warner wasn't being hold, he was being push.
diamorious 3 years ago
im a arizona cardinals fan it wasnt a hold man but it was stupid for kurt warner to throw it like that.. and NOT throw in backcorner for larry.. er... and @ Naddeob12 stfu we made it to the superbowl bitch dont try talkin smack after they made it that far.
Youracomedian 3 years ago
Harrison should be MVP if they win!
Angelicacu 3 years ago
i posted this shit first out of anyone on youtube
golfomania7 3 years ago
yours really sux!
orangeolive 3 years ago
that probably means you weren't doing anything fun for the superbowl
elspanishswede 3 years ago