Everyone talks about this RACE problem and says that this RACE problem will be over when the third world pours into EVERY White country and ONLY into White countries. Everyone says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY White country and ONLY White countries to “assimilate,” that is, intermarry, with all those non-Whites. According to the UN, this is genocide. They claim they are anti-racist, but what they are is anti-White. Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.
History or alleged events of the past do not justify white genocide today.
Besides if we look at history clearly, events are orchestrated by a unity of world leaders. they may look white but have no loyalty to whites. (Actually they have been inbreeding so long they could be a separate race). Whites are being scapegoated, to the liking of white elites, for what those elites have done.
Those who believe in the white guilt narrative support the white genocide.
Japan is 98.5% Japanese. Japan does not let foreigners vote and kicks them out all the time. Japan is RICH and has a horrendous colonial history. Yet no one is Demanding the Japanese in Japan, be replaced with a Blended humanity to end “racism”. They only Demand this of White countries.
This is the common ground on which anti-Whites say we must all agree:
What is non-White belongs to non-Whites. What is White also belongs to non-Whites.
Definition of genocide; "The deliberate and systematic extermination of a national, racial, political, or cultural group." Nobody is being forced to mate with anyone. People have freewill and get to choose their partners. White people being attracted to people from other countries and then consciously choosing to produce with them is NOT genocide. By definition there is literally no genocide against whites at all. Did you know that there are MORE white people now then there were 100 years ago??
Nations have never been based on skin color, (race and color are two different things, I can get a sun tan that won't change my race) stupid thing to say but oh well you're not alone with that.
And nobody used the word based, that's another stupid thing to say by White or Black nation we're speaking of nations by which group forms the plurality.
The number of hate groups matters why? Not a thing you have said makes n8glenn any less hypocritical.
@xXWhiteRabbitDannyXx Notice how these people always argue for solutions that result in fewer White people? They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-White. Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.
@n8glenn. I do believe the penny dropped for you just then when you said it makes no sense when it is done by the people who CONTROL White countries.
Taiwanese government are no trichly rewarded for aiding and abetting slow genocide of the Taiwanese. Japanese governments are not richly rewarded for aiding and abetting slow genocide of Japanese people.
This only happens in White countries under the guise of anti-racism.
It would appear Anti-Whites control White countries...
It is only White countries that offer benefits to encourage Illegal non-White entrants to come here, give them amnesty after a while and 'assimilate'.
Japan does not offer benefits to tempt non-Japanese to illegally enter Japan, give them amnesty after a few years and 'assimilate'. China doesn't offer benefits to tempt third worlders to illegally enter China, give them amnesty after a while and 'assimilate'.
All goes towards the ongoing genocide of White people.
Billions of pounds are spent encouraging Whites to assimilate with non-whites ONLY in White countries. Japan doesn't spend billions of pounds encouraging Japanese to 'assimilate' with non-Japanese. Israel doesn't spend billions of pounds encouraging Jews to assimilate with non-Jews.
@Rememberista1984 Which makes no sense, because that money would be spent by the WHITE PEOPLE who run those countries. We don't have to ADVERTIZE in mexico to get poor farmers to come here, you retard, they come on their own.
@n8glenn. Border controls stop people going to lots of countries africa and asia. It is only White countries that are told not to seriously enforce controls of borders, be flooded with millions of non-whites and 'assimilate' with them to blend Whites out of existence.
@Rememberista1984 Border controls stop people everywhere, INCLUDING HERE. If you want to LEGALLY enter asia or africa, no one will stop you, you don't know that because you never tried and do not want to go there. Which is the ONLY reason why africa is for africans, because nobody else wants it. Duh.
@Rememberista1984 And to answer your question I am ANTI-RACIST and proud of it, and you are a racist, and ashamed of it. If your little moron mantra is correct, then answer this question, do you support racism against white people, yes or no? Simple yes or no will do, unless you can't answer it without exposing your own hypocrisy.
@Rememberista1984 Again, because nobody wants to. Japan has had a stagnant, shrinking economy for over 10 years, maybe 20 now, it is overcrowded, but when westerners go there, they are welcomed with open arms, you don't know that, because you've never been there.
There is nothing to debate when every single so-called "anti-racist" will not allow whites anywhere on the planet say no to mass immigration and "assimilation" like all the non-white countries do.
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white,so-called "anti-racists" prove it.
What, no, of course not. Neither were the none-white ones who defended their livelihoods. And yes, I honestly do think a society can be racist. I've said it before; there are racist attitudes against most groups, but some groups are especially singled out. The majority populations are in a position of circumstantial privilege, and I think the best way to equalize the situation - and nurture a more equal society - is to acknowledge, and maybe even attempt to counter, the biases leading to such...
@KillgoreOv ...circumstances. And while I agree, all criminals should be punished, foreign or otherwise, I think it's important to treat those who are actual residents of the country with respect. Again, I'm against discrimination on all accounts, against whites or against black or whatever. I'm not calling the "institution" racist, just subtly biased, and as an extension, imperfect. What's wrong with realizing that?
@KillgoreOv Don't you see the double standards? To combat invisible White Privilege, the other races are given visible privileges. Poor Whites get no special scholarships, no preference in the job market, no advocates, no institutions, no protection from hate crimes, no special interest groups, etc. To combat racism by Whites, we allow racism against them. This isn't a subtle bias, but a blatant one. We are being demonised and dehumanised. This is how all genocides begin.
@TheGentlemanGhoul If the whole point is even out the social "playing field," doesn't it make sense to only give provisional preference to those groups that need it? For the record, I do think everyone should be protected by hate crimes, and in the United States, there are such protections.
My point is, there's *already* a preference for scholarships and jobs available to whites. What's so dehumanizing about the privileged majority *consciously* taking steps to facilitate...
@KillgoreOv ...freedom? It's not racism, it's a means to counter discrimination. Furthermore, a fair amount of this equal opportunity action is encouraged by white people. It's not dehumanizing, it's rehumanizing, for everyone.
@KillgoreOv There are NO White scholarship funds. Should Japan offer scholarships specifically for Whites, to even the playing field in Japan? Should the Japanese government offer employers taxpayer's money for every White person they hire? Should there be angry White advocates calling out the Japanese for any perceived bias? Should the Japanese receive longer sentences when their crimes involve a White victim? Where are the billboards saying, 'It's hard to see racism when you're Japanese'?
@TheGentlemanGhoul Maybe; there's honestly plenty to criticize about how Japan handles social situations. I'd suggest you take that up with the Japanese government, though.
@KillgoreOv I think Japan handles things just fine. They have their heads screwed on, unlike the majority of Whites, who seem to think that racial suicide is preferable to being called the dreaded 'R' word.
@TheGentlemanGhoul Japan does just fine, sure, but it has problems like any other country. Anyway...
When you say the "majority of whites" consider "racial suicide" preferable to social estrangement, I can't help but feel as though you're projecting your own view onto everyone else. Ever consider the possibility that your head may be the one that's not screwed on correctly?
@KillgoreOv So Whites are the only people that are doing the right thing by disappearing? And all other races are doing the wrong thing by maintaining their own power and interests within their own lands? Did you know that this is the first time in the history of mankind that a people has freely given it's sovereign birthright to foreign invaders, all without a fight? What about those of us that don't want to give up? Those of us that say this is genocide? Should we just keep quiet? Or fight?
@TheGentlemanGhoul Internet rally. On youtube. Gee wiz; that'll get things done.
I don't know where you're pulling this from. I didn't say anything of the sort. You're misconstruing the situation to appear as though you're under attack, when it's quite clear that you're not. Honestly, GG, I'd have expected better of you. Sovereign birthright? I don't quite think you understand how democracy works.
@KillgoreOv You think we are limited to YouTube, or are you being facetious? White Nationalism exists in all White countries, and once we have our lands back, who is to say we won't govern ourselves democratically. The immutable belief common to all nationalist is that every race and ethnicity has a right to self-determination. Nationalists can be very diverse in other areas of thinking. We simply want to maintain our majority statuses and political power in the nations built by our ancestors.
You don't have to justify your narrow-mindedness to me, GG. I think you're perfectly entitled to shield your delicate psyche from reality with whatever petulant assumptions and noxious delusions you desire. Just don't be surprised when they ring hollow in the end.
@KillgoreOv You running out of excuses for your apathy regarding worldwide, White demographic decline? I'm narrow minded, petulant, and delusional for opposing it? How long before you call me a racist?
@KillgoreOv Do you, or do you not believe that Whites are becoming minorities in every land in which they inhabit? If you do, do you think that this is a good thing? If you think that this is a bad thing, then you must also agree that things need to change, in order to preserve the White race. Whites must be able to practice freedom of association (which is a human right), without being labeled White supremacists. Right?
@TheGentlemanGhoul I think the situation is a bit more complicated than you realize; I'd say it's neither a good nor bad thing, it simply is. Racial groups are a lot more nebulous than you're suggesting; boundaries blend and break frequently. I can't even answer your question, it's so poorly phrased; I'm more concerned with the preservation of the human species. Though I am curious to hear how you'd deal with this illusory "problem" of yours.
@KillgoreOv Just one other thing: while you totally have a right to freely associate with whomever you choose, it's also within everyone else's right to label you as they please and call you on your prejudice. Freedom of speech, and whatnot.
@TheGentlemanGhoul Go figure. You would feel the need to put words in my mouth. After all, gotta feed that victim complex of yours, don't we? I'm talking about the tendency of genetic variation to increase within a separate population. I don't know why I'm bothering at this point; you don't seem to know much about genetics.
Since the intellectual value of this conversation has dried up, I think I shall take my leave. Grasp the illusion tighter, GG; it's all you'll ever have.
@KillgoreOv It was Craig Venter, the liberal geneticist who said, "We all are essentially identical twins". He screwed up when his own work led to the understanding that humans have 98.4% of our genes in common, and not 99.9% as he originally posited. So we are 1,500% more distinct from each other was previously believed. And race deniers still use the outdated 99.9% to push their agenda.
@TheGentlemanGhoul I never mentioned any percent genetic difference between individuals. Though, as a separate matter, I am just curious where you got the 98.4; I'm not calling it into question though, because my point is that there's only one human species, and I don't think you should pick and choose which groups to support. The vast majority of human life is worth preserving, I'd say.
But it's interesting you bring up the existence of colours. I think you may be...
@KillgoreOv ...interested to hear how our perception of colour works. Not being an expect on the subject, all I can say is that it appears as though colours as we typically refer to them may not... accurately represent the world.
Not that this matters, since genetics are different from colours. You said at one point that a cross between a tiger and a lion belongs to neither species. But consider the huge number of ancestors each one of us has had. What if one was not white?
@KillgoreOv (I hate to rant, but) I mean, wouldn't it just take one non-European ancestor in all of one's ancestry to make them non-European? Making the assumption that each generation is about 20 years, by the time you look back about 400 years, you'll have *around* (and this is an estimate) 1 million ancestors.
C0nc0rdance did a much more eloquent video on the subject:
I can't post the link, but it's called "do human races exist" if you wanna take a look.
@KillgoreOv And those 1 million ancestors aren't necessarily all separate individuals. My great great great great grandfather on my mother's side, may also be my great great great great grandfather on my father's side.
@KillgoreOv genomebiology (dot) com/2010/11/5/R52/abstract is where I found that human genetic variation is greater than previously thought. And of course our perception of colour doesn't accurately represent the world, which is why we use so many devices to see what would otherwise be invisible. And I don't buy into the one drop rule. All tigers share a common ancestor with lions, that doesn't mean tigers aren't tigers.
That too; as you say, there is plenty we cannot see as well.
Furthermore, you are right about the fact that some of them may be the same person; I forgot to mention that, so thank you for correcting me. The number is still fairly high enough to make the point, I hope. I was just trying to emphasize the nebulous nature of what we daily refer to as "race." Whether race exists or not is a separate, yet related, debate.
@KillgoreOv There were points during prehistory when all of your ancestor numbered as few as several thousand, due to population bottlenecks and geographic isolation. But that's beside the point.
What conclusions do you expect the scientific community to come to, when a controversial discovery can lead to accusations of 'scientific racism' and subsequent job loss? The only acceptable conclusions would be liberal ones. Hence, race has no taxonomic value.
@TheGentlemanGhoul Yeah, we seem to agree on the matter, more or less. That there's a fair number of ancestors, and whatnot.
But I don't necessarily think what you're implying is true. Again, I'd rather not get into a debate about the existence of race, since it's also quite complicated and a bit removed from my knowledge of genetics, but I don't think you give the scientific community enough credit. I'd say they're reasonably removed from such bias.
@KillgoreOv A couple of thousand years ago, instead of accusations of 'racism' striking fear into the hearts of men of science, there was 'heresy'. The Earth was the centre of the universe back then, and Claudius Ptolemy proved it with his over-complicated system of epicycles, to explain the retrograde motion of the planets. If he'd stated the obvious, that the Earth and the planets orbited the Sun, he'd have been executed.
@TheGentlemanGhoul Today, if a scientist allows himself to come to the obvious conclusion that races do exist, he will be labeled a racist, and will lose everything.
Racism is the new heresy, witchcraft, blasphemy, fascism. These words were all used to silence those whose views were deemed unorthodox. Political correctness has a leash on science, just as religion once did.
@TheGentlemanGhoul We have been undergoing the process of speciation for the last few dozen millenia. If we were any other species, our differences would be enough for us to be classified as separate subspecies. But since we're Humans, and our feelings might get hurt, then we are the result of a cosmic fluke, in that we are all "essentially identical twins".
@TheGentlemanGhoul While I do agree with you that political correctness is less useful in certain circumstances than it intends to be, I'd like to point out that racism is, in fact, a demonstrable social ill.
I don't honestly know how you can support the claim that every single scientist is chained to unscientific claims by fear. You simply cannot argue with good science; if the existence of race is so inexcusably obvious, surely there wouldn't be so much debate.
@KillgoreOv Heresy, witchcraft, blasphemy... These aren't really founded on anything too concrete; they're scare-words, sorta like you were saying. But fascism and racism... these stand for real things... not very good things either.
The word "racism" is thrown about with less precision than before, I'll grant you. But that doesn't mean it's a meaningless word. Racism is very real, and has a well-documented list of negative effects.
@KillgoreOv I agree that racism is real and harmful. Treating somebody like crap because they are different, is abhorrent. But neither acknowledging difference nor preferring your own kind, is in any way, racist.
@TheGentlemanGhoul You've pointed out before that this "essentially identical twins" idea has been debunked. I don't think qualified geneticists still share that belief. Maybe people who aren't too knowledgeable in the field, sure, but I think you're severely exaggerating the extent of it.
And I'm not saying the only way to get rid of racism is to ignore it either. I'd agree when you say being colorblind is sorta like being racist too.
@KillgoreOv Recognizing one's differences - cultural or color based - aren't racist, I don't think, though I recognize some people would. Just for the sake of it, lemme clarify that I consider racism to be prejudice based upon race, negative or otherwise.
But I'd like to see what research supports the idea that races represent different "subspecies" of human. I'm not really sure that's a supportable claim. I'm no geneticist, mind.
@KillgoreOv Waaaaaiiit.... I misread something there. How is not preferring your own kind racist? That... seems like a huge basis for racism right there. By prefering your own in-group, whatever that may be, you're automatically biasing yourself against those in the out-group.
I mean, what's wrong with considering the human race your "kind?"
@TheGentlemanGhoul Not necessarily. But there's a relevant difference between your children and an entire population of strangers. You live and take care of your kids. If you're a woman and you haven't adopted, then, hell, they were once a part of you. It's a reasonable preference.
But giving preference to one stranger, who's white, over another stranger, who's black, simply as a function of skin tone is, indeed, racist. Can you see the difference?
@KillgoreOv I prefer the company of White people more than I do the other races, but not for the colour of their skin. Having preference for, is not the same as giving preference to. There's no such thing as a thought crime, yet. I don't know if you've heard, but people tend to form relationships and groups (consciously or unconsciously) based on their similarities, not their differences.
@TheGentlemanGhoul You're perfectly entitled to associate as you please, I agree. But other people are also free to label you anything they want. I don't know if you saw my talk with NubianNazi, but some people may say his desire to live in a white-only neighborhood is racist. They're free to do so, and may or may not be correct. In this particular example, however, I'd say that's accurate. Similarly, I'd say your preferences are, perhaps, steeped in irrational prejudice.
@KillgoreOv Accusations of racism can get people fired from their jobs. Did you hear of the White 3 year old in the UK who had his name added to a permanent government database for a racist remark? He called another kid, 'broccoli head'. Over 30,000 British school children have had their names put into this database over the course of a single year. This record will follow them from school to school, and eventually into employment. And who wants a racist working for them?
It needs to lose it's power over people. If you're afraid of the label, you'll do your best to avoid it. If it wasn't afforded the power it has, then Whites would be free to be nationalists, or simply just to be proud of their race, because after all, 'racist' would only be a word.
@TheGentlemanGhoul Since I'm not from the UK, I'm rather curious; what database is this? I'd just like to read about it a little.
To me, it honestly just sounds like you're upset that you have a rather unpopular opinion about race. A lot of what you're saying sounds like exaggeration, and I honestly doubt you've got anything other than personal observation to back up those hefty claims.
And honestly, how would you solve this problem? Keeping free speech in mind, course.
@KillgoreOv Mind you, if what you're saying is true (the database), I'd be against it. I've never been too in favor of hate speech laws; I'm staunchly against infringing people's freedom of speech. Even so, there are those in America who feel the way you do, and claim there's a white genocide.
Although your claims may stand somewhat in a country with hate speech laws, I'm not sure they would in one without them.
Genocide is happening in South Africa by the way. Our White brothers and sisters are being murdered in their thousands. That's what happens to a White minority in a land full of resentful non-Whites. The rest of the world is blind and deaf in regards to their plight. A look at South Africa, is a look at our future.
@TheGentlemanGhoul Oh, and you may not believe much of what I say, but I have been absolutely honest with you. There isn't a single lie in any of my posts, and I always try not to exaggerate my claims, since they can all be researched.
@TheGentlemanGhoul First of all, lemme clarify; I'm not calling you a liar, I'm questioning the validity of your sources. That's all. I try not to accuse people of lying intentionally.
But among other things, you realize there's quite a bit of genocide in Africa. Why just worry about that against a particular group? Stop em all, I say. I'd still just like to know the name of this database; I'm not saying it doesn't exist.
@KillgoreOv But again, realize, there are people claiming that there's white genocide in America without such organizations. Hell, I'd still say it doesn't exist in the UK. But in countries without hate speech laws, how can such a claim stand?
It's one thing to be arrested for saying racist things, but it's hardly an injustice to be insulted for saying them.
@KillgoreOv Did you visit the link? The name of the database wasn't mentioned, but the authority that school teachers are reporting to is the Department for Education. The article says, "Figures for the year 2009-10 were obtained under the Freedom of Information Act by the civil liberties group the Manifesto Club."
And I don't think you're calling me a liar, you're just taking what I say with a pinch of salt, which is sensible. Believe it or not, I shared your exact views until quite recently.
@TheGentlemanGhoul The reason why I prefer having this discussion with you over, say, NubianNazi, is that you can think rationally. We may disagree, but at least you're thinking about the topic.
Unfortunately the link you posted brought me to the dailymail main page, but I found the article elsewhere.... and, now, I don't mean to be *that guy,* but I'm seriously questioning the validity of the article's sources. The only place I can find this thing is, well, dailymail...
@KillgoreOv ...infowars, and some other tabloid sites. That'd be fine if there were actual sources for the information in Adrian Hart's article, but, hell, I even took a look into that "2000 race relations act," and I can't find any relevant information.
I'm afraid I don't trust this story very well. But even if it were true, the solution seems kinda simple; remove the database. Right? Or simply make the information anonymous. Those would both work.
@KillgoreOv The Manifesto Club is apparently a legit organisation that has had stories published in a few newspapers.
The reason NubianNazi and many others use Bob's Mantra, is because holding a conversation with one person over the course of several days seems to achieve next to nothing in regards to raising awareness. The Mantra is much more effective at getting the message out there. It's fast and gets seen by a lot of people.
@TheGentlemanGhoul If your interest in White genocide is to understand why people believe it, and not merely just to try and disprove it's existence, then I suggest you have a look at Thesystemisantiwhite's channel here on YouTube. Don't let the name deter you. He's an articulate lad who is doing a better job than I at bringing to light the double standard that permeates our society.
@TheGentlemanGhoul And in regard to the genocides in Africa, the UN at least acknowledges the Black on Black genocides, and is having talks with the African Union concerning them. However, the genocide of Boers is still being ignored, and Robert Mugabe is being allowed to get away with committing White genocide in Zimbabwe, despite groups bringing both of these to the attention of the UN on several occasions.
@TheGentlemanGhoul Well, honestly I wasn't thinking of the mantra just then, but since you brought it up, let me share what I have to say about it. My main problem is that people tend to drop it into a conversational instead of use their own thoughts. I know using phrases and the like are useful for creating some sort of unified movement, but it's not a good replacement for thinking at all. It's also... well, untrue.
I suppose I have no idea which way this conversation is...
@KillgoreOv going at the moment, and I'd say it's prolly not going to go anywhere especially productive any time soon. I just find it silly to conflate a double standard - which may or may not exist, but for now lets assume it does - into genocide. Like, very silly. But, ah... honestly, we'll probably just keep going in circles at this rate.
As for the Boer genocide, again, I'm totally against that. It's a damn shame if it goes unnoticed... that's something to look into.
@KillgoreOv Don't bother, you'll find no logic or reason there. These clowns are just endlessly spouting propaganda about a "white genocide" which consists of minorities existing and "blending" them out of existence. In other words, they're promoting REAL genocide, because they really want to rid the world of all non-white people so their precious genes will be safe. They parrot the slogan, "anti-racist is code word for anti-white", but cannot defend it, it contradicts itself.
@n8glenn The anti-White stalker returns, LOL. All of this multi-culturalism is in every white nation and ONLY in white nations. Africa for Africans. Asia for Asians. White nations for everybody. It is genocide. Do you believe this is somehow moral?
@PeteHappee WHO? Who is saying africa for africans? I'll give you the answer, YOU. It's just a strange fact that people from europe and america are not clamoring to immigrate into poor third world countires! Shocking, I know, but they'd rather be rich, but if you want to go live in africa or asia, NOBODY is going to stop you and you know it. You know I would not criticize you for that, or any other antiracist, for that matter. It's a ridiculous strawman.
@PeteHappee Reality -----> You don't WANT to go to africa or asia because you would rather live in a rich country. If you want to go to africa or asia, no one will stop you. No one will say that it isn't for you, except for you.
@n8glenn Can you blame him for not wanting to go to Africa. Look what a mess it is in. When Rhodesian was under the British it was fine now look at it. Who is running Africa? Then you realise why it is a hell hole. Europe and N America got to where they are on the sweat of the white people in them. The gifted people of Africa should stay put and help their own countries.
@PeteHappee No one denied you entry into africa, no one told you that you couldn't breed white babies, no one is killing you, you're just making excuses for yourself.
@KillgoreOv And when I mentioned fascism, I'm talking of the way it was used in communist Russia. The communists used the 'fascist' label to justify murdering tens of millions of people.
Africa has half of the world’s natural resources, half of the world’s most productive farmland. Africans have 56 countries all to themselves, yet Demand to move to all White countries, to live around Whites, Demand special rights and privileges over Whites, while saying they want “equality” and to have the right to rule over Whites.
What more can we do for Africans now a mulatto is president of USA?
@NubianNazi Why is it genocide? Who is stopping you from moving to africa, or asia? Who? Who is stopping you from having children? If you're want to go to africa, just go, if you want to have 15 white babies, have them, mormons do it all the time, they have as many kids as humanly possible and nobody is stopping them.
@NubianNazi The UN definition of genocide certainly has nothing to do with you and your theories about white genocide. You're not giving a narrative or a description of what's happening, you're just throwing out words and definitions, and that's not good enough. You can't explain to me exactly how the UN definition of genocide fits into your theory of white genocide, because there are no government agencies forcing black and white people to "blend".
@n8glenn That's like saying the term "Racism" isn't giving a true narrative on what's happening but instead just running around screaming a word to get your way.
@n8glenn All you do is go around trolling Pro - White videos.
You say you're for freedom for people to go where they want, but you say nothing about the immigration policies of anywhere outside the west.
You say you don't believe in race or racism but you say nothing about all Black or Hispanic organizations, even ones which have called for the murder of Whites such as The New Black Panthers and La Raza.
You're nothing but a pile of trash, trying to convince yourself you have morals.
Nations have NEVER been black or white. Since when do people base a country off of the skin color of the residents? I know that there are places with a history of one race but that isn't what decides the nation at all. There at are also WAY more white hate groups than there are New Black Panthers and La Raza combined. There is also no reason for any of these groups and they should all be violently stopped by all the people regardless of race.
@NubianNazi And, I might add, when you start pushing racism and bigotry, that leads to REAL, not imaginary, genocide, YOU are supporting genocide. Bad luck with that position.
@n8glenn Anti-White, your position leads to the end of one race and ONLY one race. My race, the White race. And you moralize as if your genocidal ideals don't put you on par with pond scum. You are a genocidal anti-White.
True, the attempt at not being racist to minorities (if you even want to still call it that) can have a backwards effect for the majorities, but I think it is something that will change as generations of children become comfortable with each-other. It is annoying that identifying someone as a different race is considered racist, and that hiring a white man instead of a black man with the same job information is racist, but I don't think going backwards will fix it
Why is it that Oriental Asia is for the Oriental Asians, Black Africa is for the Black Africans, but White countries are for everybody?
The main stream media continually proclaims that there’s a RACE problem inside White Nations!
The media insists that this RACE problem will only be solved when non-white people from the 3rd world immigrate & replace the indigenous White population in EVERY White country & ONLY in White countries!
The Netherlands & Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or
Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve THEIR race problem by bringing in millions of foreign 3rd Worlder’s & then interbreeding with them.
The media continually indoctrinates the West to believe that the final solution to OUR RACE problem is for EVERY White country & ONLY White countries to "assimilate," or "intermarry" with all the imported non-white 3rd Worlder’s!
What would happen if I said there was a RACE problem & this RACE problem could only be solved by importing TENS of
millions of non-black people into EVERY Black country & ONLY into Black countries?
How long would it take anyone to realize that I'm not talking about a RACE problem, but rather I am intentionally advocating a destructive policy that promotes Black genocide?
How long would it take a Black man to notice that his country was being conquered? Obviously the Black population would overwhelmingly object to this genocidal, anti-Black immigration policy!
the ongoing program of genocide against my White race of people, Liberals & allegedly respectable conservatives shout in agreement that I’m a White Supremacist or a neo-Nazi who wants nothing more than to kill 6 Million Jews!
The main stream media pretend they’re anti-racist, but what they actuality are is “anti-White BIGOTS!” Anti-racist is just a code word for anti-White!
Join the White Nationalist Freedom Movement, which is no longer tolerating the establishments planned White Genocide!
ROFL maybe people wouldn't be anti white all the time if the whites didn't become the most racist race on earth in this time. They deserve this label in my opinion.
They want 3rd world colonists to take over our countries,they want to force-blend white children with them,they are apologists for non-whites harming and killing YOUR children and if you so much as say anything about all this you are a labeled a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews and targeted for reprisals.
Only the anti-whites deny that Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.
I'd love to know how the Indian, who was here before europe invaded can be classified as Native American. Britain and France and Spain stole parts and claimed it as theirs'. Shouldn't they be called original inhabitants?
@TheDano1947 Well, first of all, the "native Americans" never believed that they owned land, and second, they werent here first, we were. Watch the documentary "Ice Age Columbus" which aired on the Discovery Channel.
You're a mental cunt. Your argument is one dimensional. I'm white British. I can't stand some white people. They live on a diet of artificial culture and self righteousness. Seldom do they understand other peoples cultures because more often than not they have shed their own and replaced it with MTV. The only reason you think you're opinion matters is because you can broadcast it on the internet, find like minded and think you're superior. You're not. You're poorly read and you don't like jazz.
Racist/racism is a politically correct term! Duhhh! No wonder the racially unconcious indivivuals are brainwashed into thinking it isnt so. LMFAO! (Yuri Bezmenov)
Why in your anti-white opinion is it "racist" for a white person to defend his group from acts of genocide but not "racist" for a non-white to do the same?
It is obviously because: Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.
The continued existence of white children free from the demographic threat of elimination via mass immigration and forced "assimilation" is a petty issue?
So why do you constantly push for white genocide?
Also,where are your old anti-white buddies they seem to have vanished LOL
Who wants to be known as a white genocide advocate hiding behind "anti-racism"?
Anti Racism is a codeword for Anti White ONLY when is used as an excuse for racism against whites. It's not Anti-Racism, it's racism. If you want to get your point across, then I would not try to use America as an example of a white country because like others, it was already inhabited. I think EVERYONE has a right to live where ever they want. The people make a country what it is. Not their race.
@PomonaPunkRock LOL, this joker in one breath justifies the genocide of my race, the white race because of what happened to American Indians centuries ago and then says that "EVERYONE has a right to live where ever they want." I guess that is everyone except white people, LMAO. This joker is a perfect example of someone who says they are anti-racist. But what they really are is anti-white. Anti-racist is just a code word for anti-white.
@PeteHappee Calm down troll, I'm white as well. Genocide? How is people of different races who love each other and having kids genocide? Or when someone isn't left with any other choice, they have to flee their country to an unknown land because their country is too war torn? Do you really think they are doing it out of spite? That sounds a little bias or like paranoia, don't you think? What happened in the past is just that. We ALL need to progress as a society, not digress. It's a petty issue.
@PomonaPunkRock The 1948 United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, Article II states: genocide means any of the following acts committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group as such: (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.
Anti-whites brag about their support of white genocide. They are evil creatures.
@PeteHappee I know what the 1948 Article of Genocide is. So your saying that interracial couples hook up out of spite? Is it that hard to imagine that people of other races can love each other? Have you ever considered how those kids feel when they are criticized because of their mixed heritage? Anti Whites brag? Who is Anti White? People who choose not to acknowledge the petty issues of race because they have more important things to worry about like keeping food on the table for their family?
@Alphaman7100 Instead of repeating the same crap over and over, how about you actually give me a single speck of evidence that there's any policy that supports this fairytale of yours.
And Anti-racism is not a codeword for anti-white. Besides, I never mentioned racism, only ignorance.
Except multiculturalism isn't forcing people to intermarry. White people are choosing to either not have kids or to intermarry. It's a conscious choice. And people don't immigrate to other countries to kill people, they do it to make new lives for themselves.
Genocide involves the attempt to achieve the disappearance of a group by whatever means. It does not have to be violent, it could be a combination of policies that would lead to a certain group dying out.
~ Malcolm Fraser (Prime Minister of Australia 1975-1983)
Are you anti White? Do you support White GENOCIDE?
@Alphaman7100 Right, I agree, it doesn't have to be violent. But it does have to be intentional. Are there are any policies you'd like to point out that force people to intermarry? And if there are any, I'd be totally against them! But, to my knowledge, there aren't any.
And I am not anti-white. I'm anti-stupidity. I don't approve of *any* form of genocide or *any* form of racism. Just because I don't think you're right doesn't mean I hate white people. Or anyone, for that matter
I just figured that would be one way to enact policy. And what do you mean by a loss of self-determination? Again, I'd just like to know if there is actually any "FORCED" multiculturalism in some policy somewhere. It's kinda crucial to your point.
And instead of address the fact that I just gave you a summary of my stance, I see you've fallen back to your copy-paste "argument."
There's a middle ground between "anti-white" and "pro-white," you know
Loss of self determination is when the White population becomes a minority in their own countries, forecast for approx 2060 in the UK and other European countries. Same as Tibet.
FORCED MULTICULTURALISM is enforced in employment law, schooling - watch the video 'Forced Integration In Oldham Part Two'
I am pro White, pro Black, pro Muslim and believe all should have a homeland. Do you? Do you believe my people, White people should have a homeland? Or are you anti White?
@Alphaman7100 Before I take a look at that video, I'm going to respond.
First of all, you're still yet to name one policy that *forces* multiculturalism.
Second, I believe that all people are entitled to all lands. The idea of a "homeland" deserves critical reconsideration; we only have one earth. Furthermore (speaking from a US perspective), the idea that America is a "white nation" is flawed, severely. The idea of "race" also deserves scrutiny.
@KillgoreOv "First of all, you're still yet to name one policy that *forces* multiculturalism." Watch the video, forced multiculturalism in schools is your answer.
So please tell me which other race you think should be eradicated and blended out of existence? Should Mexico be flooded with millions of Chinese and blended out of existence? This is happening in White countries and ONLY White countries.
@KillgoreOv Nobody is flooding and “assimilating” every black nation and ONLY black nations with non-blacks and saying, “Its OK, all people are entitled to all lands. So we are going to replace black people with a blended people.” This is happening in every white nation and ONLY in white nations. They say they are antiracist. What they are is antiwhite. Antiracist is a code word for antiwhite. And what they want is genocide.
You bring so much original material to the table. How is immigration genocide? No one is forcing any group of people upon another. How is assimilation genocide? There isn't a single policy in place, to my knowledge, that's forcing groups to intermarry. It's nothing to do with anti-racism or anti-white ideology. It's fact.
@warfossil So let me get this straight. "White nations," say Europe or America or whatever, are in fact, enacting genocide themselves by not enforcing their own laws? Really?
@KillgoreOv So every white nation and ONLY white nations...ONLY white nations....ONLY white nations are forced to solve the worldwide "race problem" by flooding every white nation...ONLY white nations....ONLY white nations...ONLY white nations....ONLY white nations with non-whites and are forced to integrate with them. ONLY white nations....ONLY white nations...ONLY white nations....ONLY white nations. What is the logical conclusion? White geNOcide.
@PeteHappee Saying something over and over makes it true...Saying something over and over makes it true...Saying something over and over makes it true...Saying something over and over makes it true...Saying something over and over makes it true...
Saying something over and over makes it true...Saying something over and over makes it true...
I just pointed out that if what Warfossil said was true, then it's white people enacting genocide upon themselves.
@KillgoreOv "Then it's white people enacting genocide upon themselves." And your point is...?
Anti-white whites are, in my experience, the most dedicated to white genocide because they find it to be a form of self-sacrifice.
Regardless, one cannot dispute that All of this multi-culturalism is in every white nation and ONLY in white nations. Africa for Africans. Asia for Asians. White nations for everybody. It is genocide.
@TwiztidcAsh Aggressive turd worlders? Nigga please. watch?v=BTxZXKsJdGU
DevilMayhem666 2 days ago
@thorson31 watch?v=116w5U3QnbA You fail. Japan needs immigrants.
DevilMayhem666 3 days ago
@DevilMayhem666 Japan is very westernized (capitalist) country, there is huge sex crisis and demogrpahic problems.
However, replacing the tolerant japanese with agressive turd worlders... is not good idea
TwiztidcAsh 2 days ago 5
@DevilMayhem666 You are a massive fail as a human being.
You have just thrown Japanese people into the trash bin and want to replace them in Japan.
Could it just be they need re-education and re-motivation?
cabadejo 11 hours ago
@whitemanwaydownsouth FBI database shows that 78% of hate crimes are anti-black. Fail.
DevilMayhem666 3 days ago
@DevilMayhem666
These type of people don't listen to logic.
GhostsOfTheColonized 1 day ago
Everyone talks about this RACE problem and says that this RACE problem will be over when the third world pours into EVERY White country and ONLY into White countries. Everyone says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY White country and ONLY White countries to “assimilate,” that is, intermarry, with all those non-Whites. According to the UN, this is genocide. They claim they are anti-racist, but what they are is anti-White. Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.
wolfram54321 1 week ago
History or alleged events of the past do not justify white genocide today.
Besides if we look at history clearly, events are orchestrated by a unity of world leaders. they may look white but have no loyalty to whites. (Actually they have been inbreeding so long they could be a separate race). Whites are being scapegoated, to the liking of white elites, for what those elites have done.
Those who believe in the white guilt narrative support the white genocide.
SAVETHECHILDREN6592 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Japan is 98.5% Japanese. Japan does not let foreigners vote and kicks them out all the time. Japan is RICH and has a horrendous colonial history. Yet no one is Demanding the Japanese in Japan, be replaced with a Blended humanity to end “racism”. They only Demand this of White countries.
This is the common ground on which anti-Whites say we must all agree:
What is non-White belongs to non-Whites. What is White also belongs to non-Whites.
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.
thorson31 1 week ago
Definition of genocide; "The deliberate and systematic extermination of a national, racial, political, or cultural group." Nobody is being forced to mate with anyone. People have freewill and get to choose their partners. White people being attracted to people from other countries and then consciously choosing to produce with them is NOT genocide. By definition there is literally no genocide against whites at all. Did you know that there are MORE white people now then there were 100 years ago??
GhostsOfTheColonized 1 week ago
@GhostsOfTheColonized
Nations have never been based on skin color, (race and color are two different things, I can get a sun tan that won't change my race) stupid thing to say but oh well you're not alone with that.
And nobody used the word based, that's another stupid thing to say by White or Black nation we're speaking of nations by which group forms the plurality.
The number of hate groups matters why? Not a thing you have said makes n8glenn any less hypocritical.
xXWhiteRabbitDannyXx 1 week ago 5
@xXWhiteRabbitDannyXx Notice how these people always argue for solutions that result in fewer White people? They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-White. Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.
PeteHappee 1 week ago
Communist Party of Serbia thought us how to deal with occupants and muslims...
With Ethnic cleansings
TwiztidcAsh 2 days ago
WTF?
keithdra 2 weeks ago
@n8glenn. I do believe the penny dropped for you just then when you said it makes no sense when it is done by the people who CONTROL White countries.
Taiwanese government are no trichly rewarded for aiding and abetting slow genocide of the Taiwanese. Japanese governments are not richly rewarded for aiding and abetting slow genocide of Japanese people.
This only happens in White countries under the guise of anti-racism.
It would appear Anti-Whites control White countries...
Rememberista1984 2 weeks ago
@n8glenn You say I'm a racist for opposing White genocide? You say you are an anti-racist and condone White genocide.
Bingo. Right back to where we started;
anti-racist is a code word for anti-White
Rememberista1984 2 weeks ago
It is only White countries that offer benefits to encourage Illegal non-White entrants to come here, give them amnesty after a while and 'assimilate'.
Japan does not offer benefits to tempt non-Japanese to illegally enter Japan, give them amnesty after a few years and 'assimilate'. China doesn't offer benefits to tempt third worlders to illegally enter China, give them amnesty after a while and 'assimilate'.
All goes towards the ongoing genocide of White people.
Rememberista1984 2 weeks ago
Billions of pounds are spent encouraging Whites to assimilate with non-whites ONLY in White countries. Japan doesn't spend billions of pounds encouraging Japanese to 'assimilate' with non-Japanese. Israel doesn't spend billions of pounds encouraging Jews to assimilate with non-Jews.
This money is only spent in White countries.
All part of the white genocide plan.
Rememberista1984 2 weeks ago
@Rememberista1984 Which makes no sense, because that money would be spent by the WHITE PEOPLE who run those countries. We don't have to ADVERTIZE in mexico to get poor farmers to come here, you retard, they come on their own.
n8glenn 2 weeks ago
@n8glenn. Border controls stop people going to lots of countries africa and asia. It is only White countries that are told not to seriously enforce controls of borders, be flooded with millions of non-whites and 'assimilate' with them to blend Whites out of existence.
You really are anti-White aint you.
anti-racist is a code word for anti-White
Rememberista1984 2 weeks ago
@Rememberista1984 Border controls stop people everywhere, INCLUDING HERE. If you want to LEGALLY enter asia or africa, no one will stop you, you don't know that because you never tried and do not want to go there. Which is the ONLY reason why africa is for africans, because nobody else wants it. Duh.
n8glenn 2 weeks ago
@Rememberista1984 And to answer your question I am ANTI-RACIST and proud of it, and you are a racist, and ashamed of it. If your little moron mantra is correct, then answer this question, do you support racism against white people, yes or no? Simple yes or no will do, unless you can't answer it without exposing your own hypocrisy.
n8glenn 2 weeks ago
@n8glenn. Japan is a rich country. No one is flooding Japan with third world immigrants.
So that just show only White countries are targeted for genocide.
Rememberista1984 2 weeks ago
@Rememberista1984 Again, because nobody wants to. Japan has had a stagnant, shrinking economy for over 10 years, maybe 20 now, it is overcrowded, but when westerners go there, they are welcomed with open arms, you don't know that, because you've never been there.
n8glenn 2 weeks ago
There is nothing to debate when every single so-called "anti-racist" will not allow whites anywhere on the planet say no to mass immigration and "assimilation" like all the non-white countries do.
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white,so-called "anti-racists" prove it.
ThisIsAntiWhiteHell 3 weeks ago
What, no, of course not. Neither were the none-white ones who defended their livelihoods. And yes, I honestly do think a society can be racist. I've said it before; there are racist attitudes against most groups, but some groups are especially singled out. The majority populations are in a position of circumstantial privilege, and I think the best way to equalize the situation - and nurture a more equal society - is to acknowledge, and maybe even attempt to counter, the biases leading to such...
KillgoreOv 3 weeks ago
@KillgoreOv ...circumstances. And while I agree, all criminals should be punished, foreign or otherwise, I think it's important to treat those who are actual residents of the country with respect. Again, I'm against discrimination on all accounts, against whites or against black or whatever. I'm not calling the "institution" racist, just subtly biased, and as an extension, imperfect. What's wrong with realizing that?
KillgoreOv 3 weeks ago
@KillgoreOv Don't you see the double standards? To combat invisible White Privilege, the other races are given visible privileges. Poor Whites get no special scholarships, no preference in the job market, no advocates, no institutions, no protection from hate crimes, no special interest groups, etc. To combat racism by Whites, we allow racism against them. This isn't a subtle bias, but a blatant one. We are being demonised and dehumanised. This is how all genocides begin.
TheGentlemanGhoul 3 weeks ago
@TheGentlemanGhoul If the whole point is even out the social "playing field," doesn't it make sense to only give provisional preference to those groups that need it? For the record, I do think everyone should be protected by hate crimes, and in the United States, there are such protections.
My point is, there's *already* a preference for scholarships and jobs available to whites. What's so dehumanizing about the privileged majority *consciously* taking steps to facilitate...
KillgoreOv 3 weeks ago
@KillgoreOv ...freedom? It's not racism, it's a means to counter discrimination. Furthermore, a fair amount of this equal opportunity action is encouraged by white people. It's not dehumanizing, it's rehumanizing, for everyone.
KillgoreOv 3 weeks ago
@KillgoreOv There are NO White scholarship funds. Should Japan offer scholarships specifically for Whites, to even the playing field in Japan? Should the Japanese government offer employers taxpayer's money for every White person they hire? Should there be angry White advocates calling out the Japanese for any perceived bias? Should the Japanese receive longer sentences when their crimes involve a White victim? Where are the billboards saying, 'It's hard to see racism when you're Japanese'?
TheGentlemanGhoul 3 weeks ago
@TheGentlemanGhoul Maybe; there's honestly plenty to criticize about how Japan handles social situations. I'd suggest you take that up with the Japanese government, though.
KillgoreOv 3 weeks ago
@KillgoreOv Err... not social situations... I mean social issues. My bad. Very different things.
KillgoreOv 3 weeks ago
@KillgoreOv I think Japan handles things just fine. They have their heads screwed on, unlike the majority of Whites, who seem to think that racial suicide is preferable to being called the dreaded 'R' word.
TheGentlemanGhoul 3 weeks ago
@TheGentlemanGhoul Japan does just fine, sure, but it has problems like any other country. Anyway...
When you say the "majority of whites" consider "racial suicide" preferable to social estrangement, I can't help but feel as though you're projecting your own view onto everyone else. Ever consider the possibility that your head may be the one that's not screwed on correctly?
KillgoreOv 3 weeks ago
@KillgoreOv So Whites are the only people that are doing the right thing by disappearing? And all other races are doing the wrong thing by maintaining their own power and interests within their own lands? Did you know that this is the first time in the history of mankind that a people has freely given it's sovereign birthright to foreign invaders, all without a fight? What about those of us that don't want to give up? Those of us that say this is genocide? Should we just keep quiet? Or fight?
TheGentlemanGhoul 3 weeks ago
@TheGentlemanGhoul I say we fight!!!
DaSticksanStonesClub 3 weeks ago
@DaSticksanStonesClub Eventually we'll wake up and fight. It's in our blood. And if we don't fight, then we deserve to die.
TheGentlemanGhoul 3 weeks ago
@TheGentlemanGhoul Agreed
DaSticksanStonesClub 3 weeks ago
@TheGentlemanGhoul Internet rally. On youtube. Gee wiz; that'll get things done.
I don't know where you're pulling this from. I didn't say anything of the sort. You're misconstruing the situation to appear as though you're under attack, when it's quite clear that you're not. Honestly, GG, I'd have expected better of you. Sovereign birthright? I don't quite think you understand how democracy works.
KillgoreOv 3 weeks ago
@KillgoreOv You think we are limited to YouTube, or are you being facetious? White Nationalism exists in all White countries, and once we have our lands back, who is to say we won't govern ourselves democratically. The immutable belief common to all nationalist is that every race and ethnicity has a right to self-determination. Nationalists can be very diverse in other areas of thinking. We simply want to maintain our majority statuses and political power in the nations built by our ancestors.
TheGentlemanGhoul 3 weeks ago
@TheGentlemanGhoul I'll let you figure that out.
You don't have to justify your narrow-mindedness to me, GG. I think you're perfectly entitled to shield your delicate psyche from reality with whatever petulant assumptions and noxious delusions you desire. Just don't be surprised when they ring hollow in the end.
KillgoreOv 3 weeks ago
@KillgoreOv You running out of excuses for your apathy regarding worldwide, White demographic decline? I'm narrow minded, petulant, and delusional for opposing it? How long before you call me a racist?
TheGentlemanGhoul 3 weeks ago
@TheGentlemanGhoul I'm running out of excuses for your lack of cogent arguments, GG. And me pointing out the obvious won't help anyone.
KillgoreOv 3 weeks ago
@KillgoreOv Do you, or do you not believe that Whites are becoming minorities in every land in which they inhabit? If you do, do you think that this is a good thing? If you think that this is a bad thing, then you must also agree that things need to change, in order to preserve the White race. Whites must be able to practice freedom of association (which is a human right), without being labeled White supremacists. Right?
TheGentlemanGhoul 3 weeks ago
@KillgoreOv You don't have to make excuses for me, and if you think it is obvious that I'm a racist, then say it.
TheGentlemanGhoul 3 weeks ago
@TheGentlemanGhoul I think the situation is a bit more complicated than you realize; I'd say it's neither a good nor bad thing, it simply is. Racial groups are a lot more nebulous than you're suggesting; boundaries blend and break frequently. I can't even answer your question, it's so poorly phrased; I'm more concerned with the preservation of the human species. Though I am curious to hear how you'd deal with this illusory "problem" of yours.
KillgoreOv 3 weeks ago
@KillgoreOv Just one other thing: while you totally have a right to freely associate with whomever you choose, it's also within everyone else's right to label you as they please and call you on your prejudice. Freedom of speech, and whatnot.
KillgoreOv 3 weeks ago
@KillgoreOv It's fine for Whites to die out, because we're all basically just identical twins, right?
It would be fine for all humans to die out, since, genetically we're 50% identical to bananas, and bananas would still exist, wouldn't they?
My arguments are poorly phrased, which means that anyone who agrees with me is wrong.
Genocide is an illusory "problem", so we don't have to deal with it.
I'm happy to allow a whole race to die, but you are a racist for wanting them to live.
TheGentlemanGhoul 3 weeks ago
@TheGentlemanGhoul Go figure. You would feel the need to put words in my mouth. After all, gotta feed that victim complex of yours, don't we? I'm talking about the tendency of genetic variation to increase within a separate population. I don't know why I'm bothering at this point; you don't seem to know much about genetics.
Since the intellectual value of this conversation has dried up, I think I shall take my leave. Grasp the illusion tighter, GG; it's all you'll ever have.
KillgoreOv 3 weeks ago
@KillgoreOv It was Craig Venter, the liberal geneticist who said, "We all are essentially identical twins". He screwed up when his own work led to the understanding that humans have 98.4% of our genes in common, and not 99.9% as he originally posited. So we are 1,500% more distinct from each other was previously believed. And race deniers still use the outdated 99.9% to push their agenda.
TheGentlemanGhoul 3 weeks ago
@TheGentlemanGhoul I never mentioned any percent genetic difference between individuals. Though, as a separate matter, I am just curious where you got the 98.4; I'm not calling it into question though, because my point is that there's only one human species, and I don't think you should pick and choose which groups to support. The vast majority of human life is worth preserving, I'd say.
But it's interesting you bring up the existence of colours. I think you may be...
KillgoreOv 3 weeks ago
@KillgoreOv ...interested to hear how our perception of colour works. Not being an expect on the subject, all I can say is that it appears as though colours as we typically refer to them may not... accurately represent the world.
Not that this matters, since genetics are different from colours. You said at one point that a cross between a tiger and a lion belongs to neither species. But consider the huge number of ancestors each one of us has had. What if one was not white?
KillgoreOv 3 weeks ago
@KillgoreOv (I hate to rant, but) I mean, wouldn't it just take one non-European ancestor in all of one's ancestry to make them non-European? Making the assumption that each generation is about 20 years, by the time you look back about 400 years, you'll have *around* (and this is an estimate) 1 million ancestors.
C0nc0rdance did a much more eloquent video on the subject:
I can't post the link, but it's called "do human races exist" if you wanna take a look.
KillgoreOv 3 weeks ago
@KillgoreOv And those 1 million ancestors aren't necessarily all separate individuals. My great great great great grandfather on my mother's side, may also be my great great great great grandfather on my father's side.
TheGentlemanGhoul 3 weeks ago
@KillgoreOv genomebiology (dot) com/2010/11/5/R52/abstract is where I found that human genetic variation is greater than previously thought. And of course our perception of colour doesn't accurately represent the world, which is why we use so many devices to see what would otherwise be invisible. And I don't buy into the one drop rule. All tigers share a common ancestor with lions, that doesn't mean tigers aren't tigers.
TheGentlemanGhoul 3 weeks ago
@TheGentlemanGhoul Okay, thanks. For the link, I mean.
That too; as you say, there is plenty we cannot see as well.
Furthermore, you are right about the fact that some of them may be the same person; I forgot to mention that, so thank you for correcting me. The number is still fairly high enough to make the point, I hope. I was just trying to emphasize the nebulous nature of what we daily refer to as "race." Whether race exists or not is a separate, yet related, debate.
KillgoreOv 3 weeks ago
@KillgoreOv There were points during prehistory when all of your ancestor numbered as few as several thousand, due to population bottlenecks and geographic isolation. But that's beside the point.
What conclusions do you expect the scientific community to come to, when a controversial discovery can lead to accusations of 'scientific racism' and subsequent job loss? The only acceptable conclusions would be liberal ones. Hence, race has no taxonomic value.
TheGentlemanGhoul 3 weeks ago
@TheGentlemanGhoul Yeah, we seem to agree on the matter, more or less. That there's a fair number of ancestors, and whatnot.
But I don't necessarily think what you're implying is true. Again, I'd rather not get into a debate about the existence of race, since it's also quite complicated and a bit removed from my knowledge of genetics, but I don't think you give the scientific community enough credit. I'd say they're reasonably removed from such bias.
KillgoreOv 3 weeks ago
@KillgoreOv A couple of thousand years ago, instead of accusations of 'racism' striking fear into the hearts of men of science, there was 'heresy'. The Earth was the centre of the universe back then, and Claudius Ptolemy proved it with his over-complicated system of epicycles, to explain the retrograde motion of the planets. If he'd stated the obvious, that the Earth and the planets orbited the Sun, he'd have been executed.
TheGentlemanGhoul 3 weeks ago
@TheGentlemanGhoul Today, if a scientist allows himself to come to the obvious conclusion that races do exist, he will be labeled a racist, and will lose everything.
Racism is the new heresy, witchcraft, blasphemy, fascism. These words were all used to silence those whose views were deemed unorthodox. Political correctness has a leash on science, just as religion once did.
TheGentlemanGhoul 3 weeks ago
@TheGentlemanGhoul We have been undergoing the process of speciation for the last few dozen millenia. If we were any other species, our differences would be enough for us to be classified as separate subspecies. But since we're Humans, and our feelings might get hurt, then we are the result of a cosmic fluke, in that we are all "essentially identical twins".
TheGentlemanGhoul 3 weeks ago
@TheGentlemanGhoul While I do agree with you that political correctness is less useful in certain circumstances than it intends to be, I'd like to point out that racism is, in fact, a demonstrable social ill.
I don't honestly know how you can support the claim that every single scientist is chained to unscientific claims by fear. You simply cannot argue with good science; if the existence of race is so inexcusably obvious, surely there wouldn't be so much debate.
KillgoreOv 3 weeks ago
@KillgoreOv Heresy, witchcraft, blasphemy... These aren't really founded on anything too concrete; they're scare-words, sorta like you were saying. But fascism and racism... these stand for real things... not very good things either.
The word "racism" is thrown about with less precision than before, I'll grant you. But that doesn't mean it's a meaningless word. Racism is very real, and has a well-documented list of negative effects.
KillgoreOv 3 weeks ago
@KillgoreOv I agree that racism is real and harmful. Treating somebody like crap because they are different, is abhorrent. But neither acknowledging difference nor preferring your own kind, is in any way, racist.
TheGentlemanGhoul 3 weeks ago
@TheGentlemanGhoul You've pointed out before that this "essentially identical twins" idea has been debunked. I don't think qualified geneticists still share that belief. Maybe people who aren't too knowledgeable in the field, sure, but I think you're severely exaggerating the extent of it.
And I'm not saying the only way to get rid of racism is to ignore it either. I'd agree when you say being colorblind is sorta like being racist too.
KillgoreOv 3 weeks ago
@KillgoreOv Recognizing one's differences - cultural or color based - aren't racist, I don't think, though I recognize some people would. Just for the sake of it, lemme clarify that I consider racism to be prejudice based upon race, negative or otherwise.
But I'd like to see what research supports the idea that races represent different "subspecies" of human. I'm not really sure that's a supportable claim. I'm no geneticist, mind.
KillgoreOv 3 weeks ago
@KillgoreOv Waaaaaiiit.... I misread something there. How is not preferring your own kind racist? That... seems like a huge basis for racism right there. By prefering your own in-group, whatever that may be, you're automatically biasing yourself against those in the out-group.
I mean, what's wrong with considering the human race your "kind?"
KillgoreOv 3 weeks ago
@KillgoreOv Does preferring your own children over your neighbour's mean that you hate your neighbour's children?
TheGentlemanGhoul 3 weeks ago
@TheGentlemanGhoul Not necessarily. But there's a relevant difference between your children and an entire population of strangers. You live and take care of your kids. If you're a woman and you haven't adopted, then, hell, they were once a part of you. It's a reasonable preference.
But giving preference to one stranger, who's white, over another stranger, who's black, simply as a function of skin tone is, indeed, racist. Can you see the difference?
KillgoreOv 3 weeks ago
@KillgoreOv I prefer the company of White people more than I do the other races, but not for the colour of their skin. Having preference for, is not the same as giving preference to. There's no such thing as a thought crime, yet. I don't know if you've heard, but people tend to form relationships and groups (consciously or unconsciously) based on their similarities, not their differences.
TheGentlemanGhoul 3 weeks ago
@TheGentlemanGhoul You're perfectly entitled to associate as you please, I agree. But other people are also free to label you anything they want. I don't know if you saw my talk with NubianNazi, but some people may say his desire to live in a white-only neighborhood is racist. They're free to do so, and may or may not be correct. In this particular example, however, I'd say that's accurate. Similarly, I'd say your preferences are, perhaps, steeped in irrational prejudice.
KillgoreOv 3 weeks ago
@KillgoreOv Accusations of racism can get people fired from their jobs. Did you hear of the White 3 year old in the UK who had his name added to a permanent government database for a racist remark? He called another kid, 'broccoli head'. Over 30,000 British school children have had their names put into this database over the course of a single year. This record will follow them from school to school, and eventually into employment. And who wants a racist working for them?
TheGentlemanGhoul 3 weeks ago
@TheGentlemanGhoul 'Racist' isn't just a word, it's a sentence.
It needs to lose it's power over people. If you're afraid of the label, you'll do your best to avoid it. If it wasn't afforded the power it has, then Whites would be free to be nationalists, or simply just to be proud of their race, because after all, 'racist' would only be a word.
TheGentlemanGhoul 3 weeks ago
@TheGentlemanGhoul Since I'm not from the UK, I'm rather curious; what database is this? I'd just like to read about it a little.
To me, it honestly just sounds like you're upset that you have a rather unpopular opinion about race. A lot of what you're saying sounds like exaggeration, and I honestly doubt you've got anything other than personal observation to back up those hefty claims.
And honestly, how would you solve this problem? Keeping free speech in mind, course.
KillgoreOv 3 weeks ago
@KillgoreOv Mind you, if what you're saying is true (the database), I'd be against it. I've never been too in favor of hate speech laws; I'm staunchly against infringing people's freedom of speech. Even so, there are those in America who feel the way you do, and claim there's a white genocide.
Although your claims may stand somewhat in a country with hate speech laws, I'm not sure they would in one without them.
KillgoreOv 3 weeks ago
@KillgoreOv Prepare to eat your words, oh ye of little faith.
dailymail (dot) co.uk/news/article-2037050/Racists-aged-THREE-Children-accused-bigotry-broccoli-head-calling.html.
Genocide is happening in South Africa by the way. Our White brothers and sisters are being murdered in their thousands. That's what happens to a White minority in a land full of resentful non-Whites. The rest of the world is blind and deaf in regards to their plight. A look at South Africa, is a look at our future.
TheGentlemanGhoul 3 weeks ago
@TheGentlemanGhoul Oh, and you may not believe much of what I say, but I have been absolutely honest with you. There isn't a single lie in any of my posts, and I always try not to exaggerate my claims, since they can all be researched.
Google search, Genocide Watch South Africa.
TheGentlemanGhoul 3 weeks ago
@TheGentlemanGhoul First of all, lemme clarify; I'm not calling you a liar, I'm questioning the validity of your sources. That's all. I try not to accuse people of lying intentionally.
But among other things, you realize there's quite a bit of genocide in Africa. Why just worry about that against a particular group? Stop em all, I say. I'd still just like to know the name of this database; I'm not saying it doesn't exist.
If it does exist, I stand against it.
KillgoreOv 3 weeks ago
@KillgoreOv But again, realize, there are people claiming that there's white genocide in America without such organizations. Hell, I'd still say it doesn't exist in the UK. But in countries without hate speech laws, how can such a claim stand?
It's one thing to be arrested for saying racist things, but it's hardly an injustice to be insulted for saying them.
KillgoreOv 3 weeks ago
@KillgoreOv Did you visit the link? The name of the database wasn't mentioned, but the authority that school teachers are reporting to is the Department for Education. The article says, "Figures for the year 2009-10 were obtained under the Freedom of Information Act by the civil liberties group the Manifesto Club."
And I don't think you're calling me a liar, you're just taking what I say with a pinch of salt, which is sensible. Believe it or not, I shared your exact views until quite recently.
TheGentlemanGhoul 3 weeks ago
@TheGentlemanGhoul The reason why I prefer having this discussion with you over, say, NubianNazi, is that you can think rationally. We may disagree, but at least you're thinking about the topic.
Unfortunately the link you posted brought me to the dailymail main page, but I found the article elsewhere.... and, now, I don't mean to be *that guy,* but I'm seriously questioning the validity of the article's sources. The only place I can find this thing is, well, dailymail...
KillgoreOv 3 weeks ago
@KillgoreOv ...infowars, and some other tabloid sites. That'd be fine if there were actual sources for the information in Adrian Hart's article, but, hell, I even took a look into that "2000 race relations act," and I can't find any relevant information.
I'm afraid I don't trust this story very well. But even if it were true, the solution seems kinda simple; remove the database. Right? Or simply make the information anonymous. Those would both work.
KillgoreOv 3 weeks ago
@KillgoreOv The Manifesto Club is apparently a legit organisation that has had stories published in a few newspapers.
The reason NubianNazi and many others use Bob's Mantra, is because holding a conversation with one person over the course of several days seems to achieve next to nothing in regards to raising awareness. The Mantra is much more effective at getting the message out there. It's fast and gets seen by a lot of people.
TheGentlemanGhoul 3 weeks ago
@TheGentlemanGhoul If your interest in White genocide is to understand why people believe it, and not merely just to try and disprove it's existence, then I suggest you have a look at Thesystemisantiwhite's channel here on YouTube. Don't let the name deter you. He's an articulate lad who is doing a better job than I at bringing to light the double standard that permeates our society.
TheGentlemanGhoul 3 weeks ago
@TheGentlemanGhoul And in regard to the genocides in Africa, the UN at least acknowledges the Black on Black genocides, and is having talks with the African Union concerning them. However, the genocide of Boers is still being ignored, and Robert Mugabe is being allowed to get away with committing White genocide in Zimbabwe, despite groups bringing both of these to the attention of the UN on several occasions.
TheGentlemanGhoul 3 weeks ago
@TheGentlemanGhoul Well, honestly I wasn't thinking of the mantra just then, but since you brought it up, let me share what I have to say about it. My main problem is that people tend to drop it into a conversational instead of use their own thoughts. I know using phrases and the like are useful for creating some sort of unified movement, but it's not a good replacement for thinking at all. It's also... well, untrue.
I suppose I have no idea which way this conversation is...
KillgoreOv 3 weeks ago
@KillgoreOv going at the moment, and I'd say it's prolly not going to go anywhere especially productive any time soon. I just find it silly to conflate a double standard - which may or may not exist, but for now lets assume it does - into genocide. Like, very silly. But, ah... honestly, we'll probably just keep going in circles at this rate.
As for the Boer genocide, again, I'm totally against that. It's a damn shame if it goes unnoticed... that's something to look into.
KillgoreOv 3 weeks ago
@KillgoreOv But of course, any and all genocide's abhorred. Provided there's reason enough to believe it's occurring.
But, eh, I'll sate my curiosity and take a look at the channel. Thanks.
KillgoreOv 3 weeks ago
@KillgoreOv Don't bother, you'll find no logic or reason there. These clowns are just endlessly spouting propaganda about a "white genocide" which consists of minorities existing and "blending" them out of existence. In other words, they're promoting REAL genocide, because they really want to rid the world of all non-white people so their precious genes will be safe. They parrot the slogan, "anti-racist is code word for anti-white", but cannot defend it, it contradicts itself.
n8glenn 3 weeks ago
@n8glenn The anti-White stalker returns, LOL. All of this multi-culturalism is in every white nation and ONLY in white nations. Africa for Africans. Asia for Asians. White nations for everybody. It is genocide. Do you believe this is somehow moral?
PeteHappee 3 weeks ago
@PeteHappee WHO? Who is saying africa for africans? I'll give you the answer, YOU. It's just a strange fact that people from europe and america are not clamoring to immigrate into poor third world countires! Shocking, I know, but they'd rather be rich, but if you want to go live in africa or asia, NOBODY is going to stop you and you know it. You know I would not criticize you for that, or any other antiracist, for that matter. It's a ridiculous strawman.
n8glenn 3 weeks ago
@n8glenn Reality ----> Africa for Africans. Asia for Asians. White nations for everybody! It is genocide.
PeteHappee 2 weeks ago
@PeteHappee Reality -----> You don't WANT to go to africa or asia because you would rather live in a rich country. If you want to go to africa or asia, no one will stop you. No one will say that it isn't for you, except for you.
n8glenn 2 weeks ago
@n8glenn Can you blame him for not wanting to go to Africa. Look what a mess it is in. When Rhodesian was under the British it was fine now look at it. Who is running Africa? Then you realise why it is a hell hole. Europe and N America got to where they are on the sweat of the white people in them. The gifted people of Africa should stay put and help their own countries.
cabadejo 11 hours ago
@PeteHappee No one denied you entry into africa, no one told you that you couldn't breed white babies, no one is killing you, you're just making excuses for yourself.
n8glenn 2 weeks ago
@KillgoreOv And when I mentioned fascism, I'm talking of the way it was used in communist Russia. The communists used the 'fascist' label to justify murdering tens of millions of people.
TheGentlemanGhoul 3 weeks ago
@TheGentlemanGhoul Ah.... gottcha. Well, you got the point, right?
KillgoreOv 3 weeks ago
@TheGentlemanGhoul Where does green end and blue begin? Their boundaries blend, therefore colours don't exist.
TheGentlemanGhoul 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Africa has half of the world’s natural resources, half of the world’s most productive farmland. Africans have 56 countries all to themselves, yet Demand to move to all White countries, to live around Whites, Demand special rights and privileges over Whites, while saying they want “equality” and to have the right to rule over Whites.
What more can we do for Africans now a mulatto is president of USA?
Anti-racism really is a code word for anti-White
mr1alphaalpha 3 weeks ago
Multiculturalize ALL White countries.
Multiculturalize ALL White cities
Multiculturalize ALL White Neighborhoods.
That's GENOCIDE.
What part DO YOU NOT GET?
You know you can't disprove anything I've said ;)
NubianNazi 3 weeks ago
@NubianNazi Why is it genocide? Who is stopping you from moving to africa, or asia? Who? Who is stopping you from having children? If you're want to go to africa, just go, if you want to have 15 white babies, have them, mormons do it all the time, they have as many kids as humanly possible and nobody is stopping them.
n8glenn 2 weeks ago
@n8glenn I dunno, what do any of those things have to do with the INTL Law's definition of Genocide?
You support Genocide. Good luck with that position.
NubianNazi 2 weeks ago
@NubianNazi The UN definition of genocide certainly has nothing to do with you and your theories about white genocide. You're not giving a narrative or a description of what's happening, you're just throwing out words and definitions, and that's not good enough. You can't explain to me exactly how the UN definition of genocide fits into your theory of white genocide, because there are no government agencies forcing black and white people to "blend".
n8glenn 2 weeks ago
@n8glenn That's like saying the term "Racism" isn't giving a true narrative on what's happening but instead just running around screaming a word to get your way.
surely that's not the case! :O
Anti-Racism is just a codeword for Anti-White
NubianNazi 2 weeks ago
@n8glenn All you do is go around trolling Pro - White videos.
You say you're for freedom for people to go where they want, but you say nothing about the immigration policies of anywhere outside the west.
You say you don't believe in race or racism but you say nothing about all Black or Hispanic organizations, even ones which have called for the murder of Whites such as The New Black Panthers and La Raza.
You're nothing but a pile of trash, trying to convince yourself you have morals.
xXWhiteRabbitDannyXx 2 weeks ago
@xXWhiteRabbitDannyXx
Nations have NEVER been black or white. Since when do people base a country off of the skin color of the residents? I know that there are places with a history of one race but that isn't what decides the nation at all. There at are also WAY more white hate groups than there are New Black Panthers and La Raza combined. There is also no reason for any of these groups and they should all be violently stopped by all the people regardless of race.
GhostsOfTheColonized 1 week ago
@GhostsOfTheColonized There at are also WAY more white hate groups than there are New Black Panthers and La Raza combined.
please provide the proof that supports your ststement
whitemanwaydownsouth 1 week ago
@NubianNazi And, I might add, when you start pushing racism and bigotry, that leads to REAL, not imaginary, genocide, YOU are supporting genocide. Bad luck with that position.
n8glenn 2 weeks ago
@n8glenn Anti-White, your position leads to the end of one race and ONLY one race. My race, the White race. And you moralize as if your genocidal ideals don't put you on par with pond scum. You are a genocidal anti-White.
PeteHappee 2 weeks ago
@n8glenn When did I promote Genocide? Show me where. LOL
NubianNazi 2 weeks ago
Forced "Diversity" only in white countries is a program of white genocide.
ThisIsAntiWhiteHell 1 month ago
@ThisIsAntiWhiteHell You mean countries mostly owned and almost totally ruled by white people, white people who wish to exterminate themselves?
n8glenn 2 weeks ago
True, the attempt at not being racist to minorities (if you even want to still call it that) can have a backwards effect for the majorities, but I think it is something that will change as generations of children become comfortable with each-other. It is annoying that identifying someone as a different race is considered racist, and that hiring a white man instead of a black man with the same job information is racist, but I don't think going backwards will fix it
without hurting others more.
Gorekiller6 1 month ago
Why is it that Oriental Asia is for the Oriental Asians, Black Africa is for the Black Africans, but White countries are for everybody?
The main stream media continually proclaims that there’s a RACE problem inside White Nations!
The media insists that this RACE problem will only be solved when non-white people from the 3rd world immigrate & replace the indigenous White population in EVERY White country & ONLY in White countries!
The Netherlands & Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or
WesternVoices2 1 month ago
Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve THEIR race problem by bringing in millions of foreign 3rd Worlder’s & then interbreeding with them.
The media continually indoctrinates the West to believe that the final solution to OUR RACE problem is for EVERY White country & ONLY White countries to "assimilate," or "intermarry" with all the imported non-white 3rd Worlder’s!
What would happen if I said there was a RACE problem & this RACE problem could only be solved by importing TENS of
WesternVoices2 1 month ago 10
millions of non-black people into EVERY Black country & ONLY into Black countries?
How long would it take anyone to realize that I'm not talking about a RACE problem, but rather I am intentionally advocating a destructive policy that promotes Black genocide?
How long would it take a Black man to notice that his country was being conquered? Obviously the Black population would overwhelmingly object to this genocidal, anti-Black immigration policy!
However, if I state the obvious truth about
WesternVoices2 1 month ago 9
@WesternVoices2 Blah blah blah blah. Shut the hell up already.
wildstyle2192 1 month ago
the ongoing program of genocide against my White race of people, Liberals & allegedly respectable conservatives shout in agreement that I’m a White Supremacist or a neo-Nazi who wants nothing more than to kill 6 Million Jews!
The main stream media pretend they’re anti-racist, but what they actuality are is “anti-White BIGOTS!” Anti-racist is just a code word for anti-White!
Join the White Nationalist Freedom Movement, which is no longer tolerating the establishments planned White Genocide!
WesternVoices2 1 month ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
Oh and did I mention not just our time they're the most racist fuckwits but for the past centres
YouBeMadlol 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ROFL maybe people wouldn't be anti white all the time if the whites didn't become the most racist race on earth in this time. They deserve this label in my opinion.
YouBeMadlol 1 month ago
Lol it's not like the illegal immigrants are coming over on warships and blasting away at "your" civilization
Ichabodcrane21 1 month ago
Who wants to harm White children?
The anti-Whites.
They want 3rd world colonists to take over our countries,they want to force-blend white children with them,they are apologists for non-whites harming and killing YOUR children and if you so much as say anything about all this you are a labeled a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews and targeted for reprisals.
Only the anti-whites deny that Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.
OPPOSEWHITEGENOCIDE 1 month ago 2
Ant-racist is a codeword for anti-white
WeShallOvercome14 2 months ago
I'd love to know how the Indian, who was here before europe invaded can be classified as Native American. Britain and France and Spain stole parts and claimed it as theirs'. Shouldn't they be called original inhabitants?
TheDano1947 2 months ago
@TheDano1947 Well, first of all, the "native Americans" never believed that they owned land, and second, they werent here first, we were. Watch the documentary "Ice Age Columbus" which aired on the Discovery Channel.
JCistGottMitUns 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Search "Emma West tribute"
WhiteID●Com
Long live the English!
TheWhiteEuropeans 2 months ago
You're a mental cunt. Your argument is one dimensional. I'm white British. I can't stand some white people. They live on a diet of artificial culture and self righteousness. Seldom do they understand other peoples cultures because more often than not they have shed their own and replaced it with MTV. The only reason you think you're opinion matters is because you can broadcast it on the internet, find like minded and think you're superior. You're not. You're poorly read and you don't like jazz.
THENUMBERSGANG 2 months ago
@THENUMBERSGANG You are anti-white and revel in genocidal anti-white policies. You are a morally bankrupt, evil twit.
PeteHappee 2 months ago
@THENUMBERSGANG Jazz? That's not even remotely relevant. Jazz sucks my furry pair, anyway. Well-written comment, btw.
OminousReason 2 months ago
Racist/racism is a politically correct term! Duhhh! No wonder the racially unconcious indivivuals are brainwashed into thinking it isnt so. LMFAO! (Yuri Bezmenov)
j19527 3 months ago
@Braztx
Why in your anti-white opinion is it "racist" for a white person to defend his group from acts of genocide but not "racist" for a non-white to do the same?
It is obviously because: Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.
savewhitechildren 3 months ago
@PomonaPunkRock
"It's a petty issue"
The continued existence of white children free from the demographic threat of elimination via mass immigration and forced "assimilation" is a petty issue?
So why do you constantly push for white genocide?
Also,where are your old anti-white buddies they seem to have vanished LOL
Who wants to be known as a white genocide advocate hiding behind "anti-racism"?
savewhitechildren 3 months ago
Anti Racism is a codeword for Anti White ONLY when is used as an excuse for racism against whites. It's not Anti-Racism, it's racism. If you want to get your point across, then I would not try to use America as an example of a white country because like others, it was already inhabited. I think EVERYONE has a right to live where ever they want. The people make a country what it is. Not their race.
PomonaPunkRock 4 months ago
@PomonaPunkRock LOL, this joker in one breath justifies the genocide of my race, the white race because of what happened to American Indians centuries ago and then says that "EVERYONE has a right to live where ever they want." I guess that is everyone except white people, LMAO. This joker is a perfect example of someone who says they are anti-racist. But what they really are is anti-white. Anti-racist is just a code word for anti-white.
PeteHappee 4 months ago
@PeteHappee Calm down troll, I'm white as well. Genocide? How is people of different races who love each other and having kids genocide? Or when someone isn't left with any other choice, they have to flee their country to an unknown land because their country is too war torn? Do you really think they are doing it out of spite? That sounds a little bias or like paranoia, don't you think? What happened in the past is just that. We ALL need to progress as a society, not digress. It's a petty issue.
PomonaPunkRock 4 months ago
@PomonaPunkRock The 1948 United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, Article II states: genocide means any of the following acts committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group as such: (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.
Anti-whites brag about their support of white genocide. They are evil creatures.
PeteHappee 3 months ago 2
@PeteHappee I know what the 1948 Article of Genocide is. So your saying that interracial couples hook up out of spite? Is it that hard to imagine that people of other races can love each other? Have you ever considered how those kids feel when they are criticized because of their mixed heritage? Anti Whites brag? Who is Anti White? People who choose not to acknowledge the petty issues of race because they have more important things to worry about like keeping food on the table for their family?
PomonaPunkRock 3 months ago
@PomonaPunkRock Only a truly genocidal anti-white would believe that genocide is "nothing to worry about."
PeteHappee 3 months ago 14
@PeteHappee Only an ignorant twat would say that there *is* a white genocide.
KillgoreOv 2 months ago
@KillgoreOv only a BIGOTED White GENOCIDE DENIER would be so evil and morally bankrupt enough to refute it.
Anti racism is a code word people HIDE BEHIND that are really just anti White.
Anti racism is a code word for anti White.
Alphaman7100 2 months ago
@Alphaman7100 Instead of repeating the same crap over and over, how about you actually give me a single speck of evidence that there's any policy that supports this fairytale of yours.
And Anti-racism is not a codeword for anti-white. Besides, I never mentioned racism, only ignorance.
KillgoreOv 2 months ago
@KillgoreOv MASS IMMIGRATION+FORCED MULTICULTURALISM=GENOCIDE.
UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide 1948, Article 2
...any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
Anti racism is a code word for anti White.
Alphaman7100 2 months ago
@Alphaman7100
Except multiculturalism isn't forcing people to intermarry. White people are choosing to either not have kids or to intermarry. It's a conscious choice. And people don't immigrate to other countries to kill people, they do it to make new lives for themselves.
KillgoreOv 2 months ago
@KillgoreOv
Genocide involves the attempt to achieve the disappearance of a group by whatever means. It does not have to be violent, it could be a combination of policies that would lead to a certain group dying out.
~ Malcolm Fraser (Prime Minister of Australia 1975-1983)
Are you anti White? Do you support White GENOCIDE?
Anti racism is a code word for anti White.
Alphaman7100 2 months ago
@Alphaman7100 Right, I agree, it doesn't have to be violent. But it does have to be intentional. Are there are any policies you'd like to point out that force people to intermarry? And if there are any, I'd be totally against them! But, to my knowledge, there aren't any.
And I am not anti-white. I'm anti-stupidity. I don't approve of *any* form of genocide or *any* form of racism. Just because I don't think you're right doesn't mean I hate white people. Or anyone, for that matter
KillgoreOv 2 months ago
@KillgoreOv Why focus on inter marriage? Loss of self determination is also applicable.
Are you pro White or anti White?
Do you support mass immigration, FORCED Multiculturalism and FORCED Multiracialism in White countries and White countries only?
Do you support White GENOCIDE?
Anti racism is a code word people HIDE BEHIND that are really just anti White.
Anti racism is a code word for anti White.
Alphaman7100 2 months ago
@Alphaman7100
I just figured that would be one way to enact policy. And what do you mean by a loss of self-determination? Again, I'd just like to know if there is actually any "FORCED" multiculturalism in some policy somewhere. It's kinda crucial to your point.
And instead of address the fact that I just gave you a summary of my stance, I see you've fallen back to your copy-paste "argument."
There's a middle ground between "anti-white" and "pro-white," you know
KillgoreOv 2 months ago
@KillgoreOv
Loss of self determination is when the White population becomes a minority in their own countries, forecast for approx 2060 in the UK and other European countries. Same as Tibet.
FORCED MULTICULTURALISM is enforced in employment law, schooling - watch the video 'Forced Integration In Oldham Part Two'
I am pro White, pro Black, pro Muslim and believe all should have a homeland. Do you? Do you believe my people, White people should have a homeland? Or are you anti White?
Alphaman7100 2 months ago
@Alphaman7100 Before I take a look at that video, I'm going to respond.
First of all, you're still yet to name one policy that *forces* multiculturalism.
Second, I believe that all people are entitled to all lands. The idea of a "homeland" deserves critical reconsideration; we only have one earth. Furthermore (speaking from a US perspective), the idea that America is a "white nation" is flawed, severely. The idea of "race" also deserves scrutiny.
KillgoreOv 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@KillgoreOv "First of all, you're still yet to name one policy that *forces* multiculturalism." Watch the video, forced multiculturalism in schools is your answer.
So please tell me which other race you think should be eradicated and blended out of existence? Should Mexico be flooded with millions of Chinese and blended out of existence? This is happening in White countries and ONLY White countries.
Anti racism is a code word for anti White.
Alphaman7100 2 months ago
@KillgoreOv Nobody is flooding and “assimilating” every black nation and ONLY black nations with non-blacks and saying, “Its OK, all people are entitled to all lands. So we are going to replace black people with a blended people.” This is happening in every white nation and ONLY in white nations. They say they are antiracist. What they are is antiwhite. Antiracist is a code word for antiwhite. And what they want is genocide.
PeteHappee 2 months ago
@PeteHappee
You bring so much original material to the table. How is immigration genocide? No one is forcing any group of people upon another. How is assimilation genocide? There isn't a single policy in place, to my knowledge, that's forcing groups to intermarry. It's nothing to do with anti-racism or anti-white ideology. It's fact.
KillgoreOv 2 months ago
@KillgoreOv Not forcing or better yet, not enforcing?
warfossil 2 months ago
@warfossil So let me get this straight. "White nations," say Europe or America or whatever, are in fact, enacting genocide themselves by not enforcing their own laws? Really?
KillgoreOv 2 months ago
@KillgoreOv So every white nation and ONLY white nations...ONLY white nations....ONLY white nations are forced to solve the worldwide "race problem" by flooding every white nation...ONLY white nations....ONLY white nations...ONLY white nations....ONLY white nations with non-whites and are forced to integrate with them. ONLY white nations....ONLY white nations...ONLY white nations....ONLY white nations. What is the logical conclusion? White geNOcide.
PeteHappee 2 months ago
@PeteHappee Saying something over and over makes it true...Saying something over and over makes it true...Saying something over and over makes it true...Saying something over and over makes it true...Saying something over and over makes it true...
Saying something over and over makes it true...Saying something over and over makes it true...
I just pointed out that if what Warfossil said was true, then it's white people enacting genocide upon themselves.
KillgoreOv 2 months ago
@KillgoreOv "Then it's white people enacting genocide upon themselves." And your point is...?
Anti-white whites are, in my experience, the most dedicated to white genocide because they find it to be a form of self-sacrifice.
Regardless, one cannot dispute that All of this multi-culturalism is in every white nation and ONLY in white nations. Africa for Africans. Asia for Asians. White nations for everybody. It is genocide.
PeteHappee 2 months ago
@PeteHappee My point is that eve