Added: 5 years ago
From: mpl3d
Views: 20,804
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (31)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I thought Alpha andromedae was a binary system?

  • @TANGYMOMMA, quite true. This video is five years old and binary stars were not represented. You can check an update in the response videos.

  • Zajebiste^^ 

  • @piwin289011, thanks! ;o)

  • Oh just kidding with Crazychris902.

    The video is about the Andromeda constellation, its stars and planets, like Upsilon Andromedae.

  • I heared there was a race of humanoids in andromeda called enzarians or enzares or something like that and they have long ears and black holes for eyes

  • It is always interesting to meet new people, specially if they are from abroad :o)

  • gracias,thanks,obrigado

  • De nada. Existe uma nova versão v1.1 disponível, se você quiser tentar.

    You are welcome. There is a new version v1.1 available, if you want to try.

  • : ) thanks

  • eta porraaaaaaaaaaaaaa q programa e esse q tu consseguiu chegar ate em andromeda???

  • Se você está pedindo o nome do programa, é MPL3D Solar System, baixá-lo da minha web.

  • nice like in alien ship :D

  • Lol :o)

  • Elements found near super massive blue stars would be way more dense then the ones we encountered on earth. Science would love to get its hands on these elements. Imagine the power in something 100X more dense then something like plutonium.

  • Cool video...

    XD

  • hahacan a planet be soo close to a star till it melted? or mabe the land inside the planet would be all molten and suff?

  • I guess that could happen. Although it is more usual that planets too near its star evaporate until only the rocky core remains, quite hot, but not totally molten. Closest planet to the star at the video is a gas giant, but so close to its star that its class is called "hot jupiter". It hasn't evaporated yet.

  • celestia is better

  • Just to know that this simulation can be compared with celestia is a good thing. I think my simulation adds some new features, and it is still at work in progress...But, why do you think celestia is better? Thanks.

  • Oh sorry didn`t know that you simulation is still in progress! well thats sounds maybe idiotic, but i like the textures better and in clestia you have more stars, imo its more realistic and for the descriptions you can download the descriptopns in ohter langugages. how is the navigation in your prog? But hey i don`t said your prog is shit!

  • Lol, don't worry I appreciate your comments. You are right, celestia has more stars, although I think they all look almost the same. I have no plans right now about adding more of them neither adding more languages, and if you like more its textures, I can say nothing about what one's like. I tried to introduce easiness of use with a 'single click' navigation handling. Good points, thanks.

  • I believe the ease of navigation is vital to a program like this. While Celestia is a cool program, it is definitely not perfect. Not everyone enjoys downloading extra features from the Celestia Motherload and installing them manually in order to get the best out of the program. A newbie who is gaining an interest in astronomy might see this program as very laborious on the user. I myself don't mind (most of the time anyways), but I am speaking from a new user's perspective.

  • Thanks for the feedback.

  • And do you have similiar information on the other two?

  • Of course, all my videos are based on real data:

    Upsilon Andromedae b:

    "The innermost of these three worlds is an epistellar jovian, similar to 51 Pegasi b, tau Bootes b, and 55 Cancri b. These worlds would be extremely hot due to the proximity to their stars, so hot that they may glow red. Further more, their heat would prevent water clouds from forming."

  • Upsilon Andromedae c:

    "The middle world of this system is cooler than the seething inner planet. It does not glow red from the heat of the star, but it is still too warm to maintain global cloud cover. This gives the world a Neptune-like appearance, albeit for completely different reasons. Whereas Neptune appears blue from the high levels of methane in the frigid atmosphere, upsilon Andromedae c appears blue for the same reason the sky on Earth does, Rayleigh scattering."

  • Note: More info like this can be found just googling it.

  • A water giant you say? Interesting. Would its characteristics be similiar to a gas giant. Or is it something else. A kind of planet we haven't directly encountered yet or know much about. Have any more information on this water giant?

  • Yep. I gathered data from several catalogues and webs.

    It seems I can't post a link, so here is a comment:

    "Weighing in at 4 Jupiter masses is upsilon Andromedae d, the outermost known planet in this new solar system. At an average distance of 2.5 AUs, this world is has a larger orbit than Mars. The planet would likely have total cloud cover."

  • The first of those three planets looks like a dusty, possible arid world. The second and third, clearly gas giants. Interesting that both have rings. I find the grey/white gas giant very cool.

  • Thanks for your feedback, Vinceland. In fact, first planet of Upsilon Andromedae is a hot jupiter, second is a blue gas giant, as you said, and third (the grey/white one) is supposed to be a water giant.

  • Gracias brunellesky ;o)

  • esta mu guay

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more