The reason that regolith can hold prints and sand can not. EXPERIMENT IDEA BY PHIL WEBB

[Tweekerhead]

Wow Vincent, this is a great piece of evidence you have contributed.

Undeniable! 

[NASAvsPETE1]

@occhamite Yes typical mr mite sending links for schizophrenia drugs clear work of the CIA no less. Laughable.

[NASAvsPETE1]

@yesiamawizardjonny Yeh but it will soak up all that water.

[NASAvsPETE1]

@occhamite Yes they would just cave in as it would dry up all the water he added to the experiment, agree?

[yesiamawizardjonny]

@NASAvsPETE1 I added ZERO water. Stop going around lying because you know you're wrong. PETE.

[NASAvsPETE1]

@yesiamawizardjonny even without water at that temp, cave in.

[yesiamawizardjonny]

@NASAvsPETE1 Pete, temperature won't destroy the particle structure of the simulant.

[yesiamawizardjonny]

@NASAvsPETE1 Give it up. There's no water. Just because an experiment disproves you doesn't mean it's fake.

[occhamite]

@yesiamawizardjonny (2of2) Heating the stuff will remove some of that water - a vacuum and heat would be better, and get closer to Lunar surface conditions. The thing that is hard to remember- even for people with a lot of experience - is that you should never dismiss seemingly insignificant factors. They often turn-out to be very significant. The TEST is all that matters.

[occhamite]

@yesiamawizardjonny Don't worry Vince. Nobody whose opinion matters thinks you would do that. What I had in mind was this: You can bet that there is a molecule-thin layer of water on the particles of your "dry" test materials. This could make a significant difference in the behavior you observe - I don't say it did, just that it could. (cont'd)

[occhamite]

@NASAvsPETE1 nature. com/news/2007/070827/full/news­070827-9. html

[occhamite]

Good one Vincent. Very dramatic result, and from such a simple experiment. I'd be curious to see how the two compare if heated to around 150 - 180F (and also further dried to boot) as that gets closer to Apollo EVA conditions.

[NASAvsPETE1]

@krisdevalle Fine thanks she's doing her PHD in fakery how's yours?

[NASAvsPETE1]

@dalek14mc what a bunch of hog wash, yeh real evidence like each astro actor admitting that it would be "much harder today to go back to the moon", yeh I agree, van Allen, nasty flares, fry like a crispy onion.. In sure you would love to feel the retinas of your eye balls explode through the belts, no different to 43 years ago, all on a stage set, a hoax is a hoax here Endeth our lesson mr 101010100101, who ever you are?

[NASAvsPETE1]

@krisdevalle Enough evidence of a hoax to poke a stick at krispypoo.

[krisdevalle]

@NASAvsPETE1 How's the wife?

[NASAvsPETE1]

@yesiamawizardjonny You could lightly spray it with water using a type I spray pump, maybe try this, now do I sound unstable?

[yesiamawizardjonny]

@NASAvsPETE1 I could, but I didn't. Just because you're disproven, doesn't mean you can call everyone else a liar. That's called being a pussy. You're not one, are you?

The fact is, the experiment worked, and I DID NOT CHEAT. Therefore, your hoax theory has a huge hole in it now... I'm proud to have conducted such a damning experiment and I'm sure Phil Webb is for thinking of it.

[yesiamawizardjonny]

@NASAvsPETE1 So, yes, you do sound unstable.

[NASAvsPETE1]

@smogmontser 5 feet pull the other one it plays jingle bells.

[krisdevalle]

@NASAvsPETE1 Hey Peteypoo, back to your old tricks? How about bringing some evidence to the table - or is all you are good for is general disbelief?

[NASAvsPETE1]

Again more garbage, claiming tht I'm "mentally unstable , because I don't believe in the moon landings is a straw mans argument., you should stomp to show the dust., this will simulate walking and show if you put water in. Regardless on a moon set you can use what ever you like in any case.

[yesiamawizardjonny]

@NASAvsPETE1 If I put even the slightest amount of water in, the simulant would turn to sludge because of how fine the particles are. I will make a video of me stomping in it if it's really necessary either tonight or tomorrow morning.

I claim you are mentally unstable because you have like four different accounts and you use them to talk back and ofrth to yourself on your own videos and insult your friends. You're fucked up, don't deny it.

[dalek14mc]

@NASAvsPETE1-Do you have the slightest idea of what a "straw man argument" is? Calling you mentally unstable (and there is plenty of evidence to back that up) is NOT a straw man argument.

But, I have to say,refering to you as mentally unstable IS pretty accurate if you don't accept the evidence that is right infront of your face, especially when you say his experiment is "garbage" without giving a single example as to why that is so.

[yesiamawizardjonny]

@dalek14mc He has some how come up with the delusional notion that my simulant was dampened with water before the experiment was conducted...

Pathetic... He will deny the real truth no matter what so long as it supports his hoax theory.

[datzfast]

i always wondered if NASA could have faked the landings, now thanks to this video, i have proof they could have done just that, with a simulated moon dirt.

[yesiamawizardjonny]

@datzfast Actually, this proves exactly the opposite. This proves that REWAL rgolith will support a bootprint and thus completely invalidates the hoax claim. Nice try trying to pervert science to falsely support your stupid theory, but it won't work here.

[yesiamawizardjonny]

@yesiamawizardjonny REAL ***

[NASAvsPETE1]

@Changis158711 I don't know what your talking about, these are important scientific experiments that should take place,?they did. But only behind the rover, other experiments like the hammer and feather well that's obviious, fishing line held the hammer up. As for jarrahs "stomping" maybe watch the video again, I don't see a "stomp", even if it were a stomp it's should have left a harder and more precise marking.

[Changis158711]

@NASAvsPETE1 so do you mean jumping high on the moon is an important scientific experiment? and lifting your knee up over your belt, then putting it down into a box of regolith as fast as possible isn't stomping? and what about the huge dust cloud that the stomp produces?

Jarrahs experiment did not show how NASA would have faked the regolith as he didn't recreate the correct circumstances. he should also have watered down the regolith to show how a print would look in moist regolith.

[NASAvsPETE1]

@Changis158711 I gather thee could be someone I already know?

[NASAvsPETE1]

@Changis158711 Yes well isn't that funny, no astronaut could ever jump as high as they should have during Eva, only in one scene where they were standing Behind the rover, so to hide their false landing with wires, jarrahs real regolith composite is completely different to jonnys watered down version, as far as I'm concerned I wouldnt trust any of johnnys experiments, because he lied about all of his others in the past... Sad boy but at least he tries, no doubt to impress mr brant no less.

[Changis158711]

@NASAvsPETE1 if i were one of the astronauts, i don't think i would jump so high.. what if you fall and puncture your suit or break the glass on the helmet? returning men safely from the moon means that you shouldnt jump high in the air just because you can.. you're there for a specific mission, jumping many feet would provide nothing except risk of an accident. as for Jarrahs experiment, i would not call that conclusive as he should step in it more carefully as well for comparison.

[rawmonkno1]

@NASAvsPETE1 Perhaps if you ask, yesiamawizardjonny could do a video of how he produced this simulant for you to test yourself.

[stbays]

@NASAvsPETE1

He's always been honest about who he is, something I can't say about you. I'm not aware of any past lies by yesiamawizardjonny. The only thing I know about you is you're almost certainly not the person who's account name you've taken.

[yesiamawizardjonny]

@stbays NASAvsPETE1 has been proven to be Pete. I would recommend not talking to him. He has become mentally unstable and psychotic.

[stbays]

@yesiamawizardjonny

It's hard to accept. The PMs I've had with Pete were always very civil and showed compassion. This new NvP1 is an ass, much like the original started out (which I suppose could prove some kind of a connection...)

[yesiamawizardjonny]

@stbays He has multiple personality disorder, is a schizophrenic and also a psychopath.

If you want to see an accurate representation of the dude's psychosis, check out this account. "astronazi2"

And then check out Astrobrant2's channel comments. Astronazi is another Pete sock.

[yesiamawizardjonny]

@NASAvsPETE1 Sure. As soon as you're wrong, cry, FAKE! My regolith has no water in it. Please show me all of the ones I lied about in the past. You have proven nothing but your own ignoranace and mental instability. Keep it going, you're only making yourself look bad.

[NASAvsPETE1]

@Changis158711 As johnny is a compulsive liar, I would say that johnny AKA Vincent has put water on his regolith no? "stomping" on regolith is valid because I don't think astronauts carefully placed their feet down they walked which is similar to stomping...

[Changis158711]

@NASAvsPETE1 they didnt stomp as hard as Jarrah did. why didnt Jarrah try to "walk" over it? putting is foot in the box as he walked by? also, remember that the moon has 1/6th the gravity of earth, so even if they stomped, they would not have gotten the same force or momentum as they would on earth, and jarra lifts his leg so high before stomping in it that his knee is above the beltline.. indicating he used as good as all his force to stomp. you could never lift your leg so high in a EVA suit..

[rawmonkno1]

@NASAvsPETE1 Instead of spewing ad hominem attacks why do you not just ask him to refine his experiments with additional tests?

[yesiamawizardjonny]

@NASAvsPETE1 My regolith has not had any water added to it. If you watch carefully, it POURS out dry just like sand.

I think the last thing you should be calling other people is a "compulsive liar", You are a proven schizophrenic with psychopathic and narcissistic behavior patterns and a sudden hatred for people you used to call your friends.

[NASAvsPETE1]

@Astrobrant2 "well sealed container" sounds like mr Brant has done some serious dealing before? No?

[yesiamawizardjonny]

@NASAvsPETE1 The only thing I've seen Brant deal out is absolute grade-a ownage to moronic hoax theorists like you.

[NASAvsPETE1]

@yesiamawizardjonny Johnny is dealing in regolith drugs, be careful at school hopefully nobody laugh hahhaha !

[NASAvsPETE1]

@Astrobrant2 What does this prove to YOU mr brant?

[NASAvsPETE1]

@Changis158711 Yes well the results are very different I wonder what real composite jonnys regolith is? yes with a stage set you can do just about anything to make it look like the real lunar surface, many thanks.:)

[Changis158711]

@NASAvsPETE1 1) the results are different because the test performed is different.

Vincent placed his foot slowly into the regolith to create a print, Jarrah stomped his foot in it hard and fast. you can compare it to putting a egg on the table slow and carefully, or fast and forcefully.. in one test the egg is fine, in the other the egg will break, both tests was about putting a egg on the table, but the results are different..

cont'd...

[Changis158711]

@Changis158711 2) Jarrah should have tried to "walk" over the regolith, or stand on it, and Vincent you should recreate the same test as Jarrah (stomp your foot in it) to show how the regolith acts when stomped on instead of stepped on, then in the same clip, even out the regolith and then make a boot print.

recreating both results in a continuous video would show if Jarrah performed the experiment correctly, or if he stomped his foot deliberately hard to obtain his results.

[NASAvsPETE1]

I dont think "sand" was used in jarrahs tests? No. ..?

[Changis158711]

@NASAvsPETE1 JW stomped his foot into Regolith Simulant, but used sand to show the characteristics when kicked up (sand flying in arches etc) and Sand is one of the claims made on what type of material was used on the alleged fake moon set.

If i understood the claim correctly, it is dry sand used in moving pictures, and wet sand for pictures/closeups

[yesiamawizardjonny]

@NASAvsPETE1 "I dont think "sand" was used in jarrahs tests? No. ..?"

Open your ears. Rene claimed that because you can't make a print in dry sand, you can't make one in real lunar regolith. This video proves that real lunar regolith can support prints and hold distinct indentations.

[astronazi2]

Why you be so angry on my channel? Who is pete? Why you put feet in silly regolith? What it prove? Nada!

[rawmonkno1]

Thank you for the two regolith experiments, much appreciated. You should have tilted the samples so the camera could have filmed it though. It would have made the experiment much more clear to the audience, and especially to those hoaxers that inevitable will claim that you cheated.

But a great experiments with the simulant and a nail in the coffin to the old wet sand argument IMO.

[yesiamawizardjonny]

@rawmonkno1 Yeah I don't know why I didn't tilt it towards the camera. Sudden lack of judgment I guess. The hoaxers will claim what they want. They will even lie and cry "fake!" if it supports their argument. They are not interested in the truth, they are interested in being right. Fortunately, I converted because I went for the truth. I even admitted to lying about something that I purposely faked to support my arguments when I was a hoaxer. I

[yesiamawizardjonny]

@rawmonkno1 have found comfort in my firm belief that we went to the moon. The evidence supports it, and I will look for the scientific truth.

The fact of the matter is that my experiment was real, there was no cheating to be seen and this debunked Rene's old claims. Whether they choose to accept what is now evident is their opinion. Very rarely a hoaxer will be converted. I was an unusual case.

[Astrobrant2]

I do like your "regolith simulant." In color, fine granularity, and adhesive properties it is very much what I would think lunar regolith would be like.

Why don't you see if you can get a geologist to look at it, (especially under a microscope), and give you some feedback? Maybe you can sell some of it to Jarrah for oh, $30 a pound.

And kudos to Phil for the idea.

[yesiamawizardjonny]

@Astrobrant2 I have access to microscope at school. I think I may check it out tomorrow. I will try and see if I can find any geologists that would be wiling to check my stuff out, offer some advice and then tell me what to adjust.

If only I was friends wtih Jack Schmitt. He would be the best person to ask, considering he's walked on miles of the real stuff for days at a time like it was going out of style.

[Astrobrant2]

@yesiamawizardjonny Suggestion. Take only a very small amount and put it in a well-sealed container. Go to the office when you first get in the building and get it cleared.

[yesiamawizardjonny]

@Astrobrant2 Do you think I'd get in trouble for having regolith simulant? Actually I had thought about them being worried it could be drugs.. It looks like drugs... I might run into trouble depending on whether or not they believe that I'd bring FAKE moon dust to school lol

[Astrobrant2]

@yesiamawizardjonny Best get it approved. Maybe there is administrator on bus duty. Save a trip to the office.

It looks close enough to crack, and anthrax is always in the back of their minds.

[yesiamawizardjonny]

@Astrobrant2 That kind of information coming from a teacher makes me feel like I should maybe just not bring it to school...

[Astrobrant2]

@yesiamawizardjonny You shoudn't have any trouble if you take it straight to an administrator. And don't show it around.