Lord Monckton on Climate Change believers

[boxwoodgreen]

@Lochsley

CERN says different. The science is step by step destroying Man Made Climate Change Theory. CERN says it's the Sun. Always has been. Tide has turned. Polls now say less than one third of the U.S. population now believes man is affecting the climate. The fad is over.

[Lochsley]

Climate change is not even a question of belief any more.

Monckton... what a nutter!

[mrbrianmccarthy]

@Lochsley "#1:Parliament has asked Monckton to stop referring to himself as "Lord".#2 He's not a scientist!!.He's probably paid off by the oil co's.LOL Folks,Forget about Al Gore:THE SCIENCE DOESNT LIE.The glaciers have been receding,and temps are going up.Humans ARE effecting the climate.And believe me,the elites know it,and the military knows it as well.WTF do think those planes are doing spraying all these aerosols into the sky for?They're making clouds to block the sun.Monckton=disinformer

[wheresmyoldaccount]

Polar bears are cuddly is one of OUR arguments? What the fuck has this nutter been taking?

[mrbrianmccarthy]

@wheresmyoldaccount "Lord" monckton isnt a scentist,and he isnt a "Lord"-- He's just a disinformer,put out by the elites to muddy the issue,and to scare people away from supporting the politicans from taking the steps we HAVE to take to deal with this problem.Global warming IS happening,and all the science points to human activity causing it.

[wheresmyoldaccount]

Everyone who is a green is really a disguised communist? How is that NOT an avoiding the science ad hominem attack, Lord Monckton, you fuckstickle.

[mario54671]

4:18 HAH, there he is, taking on many of the comments you'll find against him on YouTube. ;)

[bdhcarbon]

this guy is crazy. Al doesnt need to debate every crazy idiot and this guy is no different. if he has a real argument, publish it.

[mario54671]

@bdhcarbon This guy's no different? he's got real science behind him, Al Gore doesn't. I think I'll go with this guy.

[mooroopoo]

@mario54671 , No he hasn't got real science behind him , this guy has been debunked several times most recently here on Youtube by `Potholer 54 `. He has be shown to be consistently wrong . spreading misinformation and just plain deceitful .

[TheSWTORMMO]

@mooroopoo So you're saying people on youtube have disproven thousands of peer reviewed science that totally discredits and shatters the data the IPCC is putting out?

You're as delusional as you are gullible.

[upyoursHoboSapiens]

Oh dear, I was giving this guy some credence until he admitted that he believes the official 911 conspiracy! Not the sign of an independent thinker.

[vivid1234]

@upyoursHoboSapiens well, just because a random internet fool like you doesn't like him, the facts are not gonna change.

[AnimusAeternus]

Eyeballs...

[8n4n08]

@AnimusAeternus He has graves disease.

[ImForwardlook]

Al Gore is one of the biggest crooks in human history and anyone who supports Obama and his plans for enslaving the human race should think again. My hat is off to Lord Monckton and everyone else who fights these evil elitists.

[blabby102]

If this idiot Monckton knows so much more than all of the researchers, why hasn't he published anything in peer review?

Maybe because his irrational views would be torn to pieces?

[shawnzi24]

@blabby102 yea just like Al "inventor of the internet" Gore has such a great science background; Another fact... your dumb ass wouldnt know a thing about global warming if it wasnt for a politican or celebrity telling you about it!

[blabby102]

@shawnzi24 I never mentioned Al Gore. I wouldn't listen to him either. BUT I do listen to the people who create the peer reviewed published research. And I do listen to the GLOBAL scientific consensus that AGW is true. People like Monckton and Gore will never have real credibility outside the public speaking circuit. The main difference between them is that Monckon is saying things that disagree with the science.

But he is too lazy to publish his groundbreaking new knowledge?

[firestrings272]

@blabby102 "...you shall know them by their fruits" If the "solution" to global warming, even if the cause is artificial or natural, is Cap and trade or going "green" and not actually attacking the root cause of the artificial excuse, which is the burning of fossil fuels. Then what's the angle? This going green nonsense is an attempt to convince people into accepting and justifying global austerity.

[blabby102]

@firestrings272 Not liking a solution to a particular problem, does not mean that that problem does not exist.

Let me guess, next you are going to go on about a global government run by the "illuminati". Or some other conspiracy theory? Or are you going to throw around words such as "fascist" or "communist" without considering their true meanings?

[firestrings272]

@blabby102 But it is a problem in and of itself when the declared problem is being sold as an excuse to promulgate self-imposed Austerity. Whether global warming exists is irrelevant,it is the proposed solutions that are a real threat. I recommend you take a look at what the whole "go green" jobs movement has done to Spain. Do you know the true source of fascism? It came from Italy, not Deutschland. And the hallmark of fascism IS a word called CORPORATISM.

[blabby102]

@firestrings272 So you ARE claiming that people who support AGW are fascists? People in .... every country. Scientists of all races and countries.

I think your problem lies not in the science, but in the proposed solutions thought up by individuals.

[firestrings272]

@blabby102 Believing in the sanctity of the peer review process is trusting in the integrity of the institutions that sponsor and support the scientists, that they will be unbiased and politically neutral. And if you believe that is the case, then you are unequivocally naive.

[blabby102]

@firestrings272 The peer review process is the best we have. It is the stage where the evidence is presented and criticized. In science, getting published is everything. But somehow Monckton refuses to submit any papers. Even if his papers would be rejected, it would put his beliefs on the record. What would be the harm?

The thing about peer review is that the only thing that matters is evidence. It makes the paper open for criticism without the need for charisma and wooing people with latin.

[firestrings272]

@blabby102 Yeah, I've heard that argument beforet. What I have found though is that the acid test of validity is to try it and see if it works. And again, the concept of getting published through peer review is fine as long as the material is consistent with orthodox ideology. I'll give you an example...do extraterrestrials exist? Now orthodoxy does not even allow the subject to be taken seriously in any way, so did the science fail? No, it was just dismissed by people.

[blabby102]

@firestrings272 I don't get what you are saying here. Are you saying that if a subject is not popular, it will not be taken seriously and not be published?

I do know that there are many papers about the existence of life in outer space. There are not many papers about UFOs coming to earth because there is no evidence to be researched.

AGW is a very popular research topic now and is being researched all over the world.

[firestrings272]

@blabby102 That's precisely what I am saying,especially when something is submitted that challenges traditionally accepted ideology.There are photographs,video,testimony from credible men and women all over the world to the existence of it.But for whatever reason,the scientific community concludes that there is no evidence,and if you look at the history of GW,esply now,it was introduced,not as hypothesis but as verified fact.And then you must ask why did scientists feel they had to falsify data?

[firestrings272]

@blabby102 Anything can be objectively studied, that statement is not even close to being logical. Did you not here about the Climategate scandal in which 1000 e-mails were leaked and there was content showing the manipulation and suppression of data? And no, extraterrestrials has nothing to do with GW, but it proves the point that your beloved peer review and agreement by consensus argument is as illogical and susceptible to corruption as Fox News.

[blabby102]

@firestrings272 Really, I thought that the independent inquiries of the leaked emails all came to the conclusion that they were scientifically sound. Can you tell me in detail this falsified data? In order to improperly "manipulate" data, it would mean that they would have to purposely not mention this in the papers. Was there any paper that failed to mention the source and any data processing that was performed?

Please tell me IN DETAIL what data was falsified...

[firestrings272]

@blabby102 Not at all. If you want to see the full e-mails I recommend you google it but here's an excerpt: "...I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline. Mike’s series got the annual land and marine values while the other two got April-Sept for NH land N of 20N. The latter two are real for 1999, while the estimate for 1999 for NH combined is +0.44C wrt 61-90...

[firestrings272]

@blabby102 ...The Global estimate for1999 with data through Oct is +0.35C cf. 0.57 for 1998." And that's just one e-mail leaked.I suggest you look into it and see the complete scam that is the push for going green, Cap and Trade, and all the other ideas being sold to us for self-imposed Austerity. And that's the real problem. "...And you shall know the work by its fruit"

[firestrings272]

@blabby102 “The common enemy of humanity is man.

In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up

with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming,

water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these

dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through

changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome.

The real enemy then, is humanity itself. Club Of Rome, 1991.

[stama9]

I like how monckton cites "multiple, independent lines of evidence" for not believing 9-11 was an inside job but attaches latin labels of logical fallacies to refute multiple, independent lines of evidence" for climate change. He is such a fraud. He's charismatic and brilliant but still a fraud nontheless and knows his audience well. Obama a communist? That's almost funny.

[chriscanada25]

I hear you and agree. except, it's ALL rotten. Obama may have good intensions but if you look at what is going on economically in the US, it smells like fascism & the nationalizing of so much private debt (GM, bailouts, more bailouts, Fanny & Freddy, national healthcare etc etc etc) is communist by nature. The US population is being transformed (same in Canada) into a collective resource base, away from your original individual & private property rights.

[ferrett78]

...(continued) - This fallacy (appeal to authority) is committed when the person in question is not a legitimate authority on the subject. or, from wiki:

"There is no fallacy involved in simply arguing that the assertion made by an authority is true. The fallacy only arises when it is claimed or implied that the authority is infallible in principle and can hence be exempted from criticism."

Thus, if most of the scientists in a certain field agree on a certain theory, you should listen.

[ferrett78]

I especially like the part where he tries to use logical fallacies to say that "Well, just because most scientists that have studied this area have come to the same conclusion, doesnt mean it's true".... And then claims its "argumentum ad verecundiam" - specifically, what's known as an appeal to authority... However, there is something he fails to mention....

[AIexKidd]

Good interview… until Monckton opens his mouth about 9/11…

No sane person suggest that "9/11 was caused by George Bush", but of course it was not the work of 'Muslim terrorists', at least, not alone.

[MegaPetrof]

"If any of them had had a classical education, they would know what utter nonsense they were talking"

Hear, hear!

[DeadlyV1RU5]

Why should Al Gore debate climate change? He didn't invent global warming and he's not a scientist. He made a movie about it in 2006. That's it. The only reason Monckton wants to debate him is because he's an easy target. If he debated an actual climatologist like James Hansen, or Kerry Emanuel, he would lose.

[renagade12]

@DeadlyV1RU5 WELL Al Gore will be the first Carbon Billionaire, if you want scientists watch the documentray: The Great Global Warming Swindle type in youtube: The Great Global Warming Swindle Al Gore's Lies Exposed By Congress Al Gore sued by over 30.000 Scientists for Global Warming Al Gore Lies About NAFTA Global Warming: Al Gore is wrong again Gore Goons Attack Journalist Re Climategate Question TRUTH Confronting TREASON in Al Gore's Empire of LIES and FEAR get informed stay safe

[CokeSupply]

@DeadlyV1RU5

Monckton wants to debate him because he lied continuously throughout his "inconvenient truth" tour and video, and stands to gain millions via the carbon tax cap-and-trade scheme, should we all believe said lies. That's why Monckton has targetted him. And I agree, he IS an easy target.

[maj1kninja07]

@robhoneycutt do you not even check and see what you wrote originally before spouting off at the mouth?? Monckton is NOTORIOUSLY awful when someone challenges his false presentation of science.

See this video: watch?v=QpOrjaWlC_E

was your post and no were in there does it mention his channel / place of work / profession with a little bit of research one could possibly find the man your talking about but then again you do not mention his 1st name so it would be purely speculation if its the 1

[maj1kninja07]

that the Dr. cherry picked*

[maj1kninja07]

@robhoneycutt also, is it not at all odd to you that the all papers that Dr. cherry picked from the ipcc's report all sited AGW as the primary reason for all of these woes? Very un scientific to jump to the conclusion and say AGW is the cause an not GW or temperature rises or anything else.

[robhoneycutt]

@maj1kninja07 Not cherry picked at all. Dr Abraham merely went through Monckton's presentation and checked his facts. Nearly every fact that Monckton states in his presentation is, in fact, a lie.

[robhoneycutt]

And here's another take down of the huckster known as Monckton....

realclimate . org/index.php/archives/2010/08­/monckton-makes-it-up/#more-47­04

[Xardes1]

Lord Monckton knows what happend on 9/11 and iraq but he do not wand to give the eco-crazys more ammo

[manoman0]

Al Gore, your System is a FRAUD. We know it and YOU KNOW IT AS WELL!

[PerthCitizensTruth]

Lord Monckton is Knights of Malta, no surprise at all he denies 9/11 was an inside job!

[dellbalboa]

Sorry Monckton, but you seem pretty ignorant on 911, maybe its time you stopped reading or watching the bbc propaganda, and get on the rationalists/scientific boat which is the 911 truthers,



[shellius]

He is so full of crap he's gone quite mad.



[manoman0]

@shellius - Yeah, that's what I thougth about Al Gore too!

[robhoneycutt]

Monckton is NOTORIOUSLY awful when someone challenges his false presentation of science.

See this video: watch?v=QpOrjaWlC_E

When Monckton saw this video, made by an actual scientist, he tried to get the professor brought up on before the university president and fired. So much for Monckton's notions of free speech and democracy.

[maj1kninja07]

@robhoneycutt good to see that the videos are removed, wish to try again? or was the scientist found to be the fraud in the last month or so?

[robhoneycutt]

@maj1kninja07 Oh, whoops! What do you know. It's still available for anyone to watch.

stthomas . edu/engineering/jpabraham/

[maj1kninja07]

@robhoneycutt very nice presentation, but you are missing the part were you are the jackass in this conversation. considering you posted a you tube video instead of the source website

[robhoneycutt]

@maj1kninja07 You know, instead of responding like a spoiled 9 year old you could simply ask what happened to the Youtube videos.

I asked Dr Abraham, personally, what happened to the YT videos after they were taken down. He said the attention he was getting from the videos was getting uncomfortable. But he continues to stand behind his research into Monckton's claims. The lawyers for his University and the president of the school also are standing by him.

[maj1kninja07]

@robhoneycutt you do realize that you've taken what i was calling you on and are trying to turn it back on me. So you can go and get raped by a pack of niggers.

[robhoneycutt]

@maj1kninja07 That's a very adult response (sarcasm).

[maj1kninja07]

@robhoneycutt it is considering how childish yours was. "i will give a /watch and then assume everybody knows that Dr. Abraham of St Thomas Minnesota was the producer of it and then pull out the sarcasm when asked about it" like you have just done again. And why did you start like that? because i asked a question and you assumed me being an asshole in asking in the argument of who is the fraud i implied the person your supporting was the one?

[robhoneycutt]

@maj1kninja07 You've more than proven already that you're an asshole. That's clear.

[robhoneycutt]

@maj1kninja07 Once again, here you're mistaken as well. I posted the Youtube channel that Dr Abraham created for people to view his presentation. Nothing sinister about that. He decided to pull that channel and direct people instead to the original presentation.

[fox2]

@walkabout09

So in conclusion:

-Climate Change is natural...get over it.

-Droughts and extreme weather has always happened, and will continue to always happen....get over it.

-Polar Bear numbers are stable.....get over it.

-DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH...and stop blindly following your leader Al Fraud Gore. (Hes already made something like $200 million off of you sheep..and yet he refuses to debate his arguments).

[fox2]

@walkabout09

Where I live, the area was covered in ice a few kilometers deep. But a 10,000 + years ago it all melted and soil was exposed.

Incase you didnt know, humans were not burning fossil fuels 10,000 years ago, but climate change happened anyways.

[fox2]

@walkabout09

As for scientists who recieve financial grants, incase you didnt know:

The scientsits who clame that 'man' is changing the climate, they get all the grants. The scientists who say that man is not responsable for global warming, well they fight an uphill battle for grants.

This is why Michael Mann from Penn state university, as well as his fellow goons might be sued for fraud as well.

You should look into who is actually recieving grants.

[fox2]

@walkabout09

The planet is 4.5 billion years old. Are you saying that Australia has never suffered drought and bushfires before?

Expand your mind alittle, the plantet isnt 50 years old.

Earth has always suffered from droughts in areas, flooding in areas, extreme heat in areas, exreme cold in areas.

River systems has always dried up, while new ones form. The earth is evolving and constantly changing....you need to think outside the box alittle.

Let nature do its thing.

[fox2]

@walkabout09 in an article entitled “Quiet Sun Puts Europe on Ice” “BRACE yourself for more winters like the last one, northern Europe. Freezing conditions could become more likely: winter temperatures may even plummet to depths last seen at the end of the 17th century, a time known as the Little Ice Age.

April 14" New Scientist" magazine.

[fox2]

@walkabout09

-Arctic ice set 30 records in April

The Arctic was more ice bound each day of April than it had been any other corresponding day in April since its sensors began tracking the extent of Arctic Ice in mid 2002

Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency,

[fox2]

@walkabout09

"Observations of the sun show that as for the increase in temperature, carbon dioxide is 'not guilty,'" Abdussamatov wrote, "and as for what lies ahead in the coming decades, it is not catastrophic warming, but a global, and very prolonged temperature drop."

-Habibullo Abdussamatov, the head of space research at St. Petersburg's Pulkovo Astronomical Observatory in Russia

[fox2]

@walkabout09

Funny you mention NASA. Scientists want to sue them as well.

There were articles just posted about scientists who worked for NASA who are now speaking out against there clame of 'man made' global warming. NASA is hiding the true data....you should look into it.

[fox2]

@walkabout09 You obviously havent been reading much into this topic. Google is your friend. Hundreds of articles are available for you to read....new ones are posted daily. Click on google, click on news, then search for: -climategate -global warming scam -Al Gore fraud -Global Cooling -NASA sued -Expanding icecaps -Expanding glaciers -Al Gore sued -C02 scam -Solar cycle - warming ...ect Hundereds of articles, with hundreds of scientists speaking up against Al Fraud Gore....

[fox2]

@fox2

....and scientists speaking up against this C02 scam. If you did your research you will see how big of a lie this truly is.

But like most sheep, you probably wont do any reading up on this issue.

[fox2]

@walkabout09

But concujak (the person who I was speaking with) and I, were talking about polar bear numbers, not about DDT in fat cells.

Im sure concujak, like myself, also agree that humans have an impact on the planet....but we are not talking about that...we are talking about polar bear numbers.

And yes Al Fraud Gore is a lier...which is why the founder of the weather channel wants to sue him and why many scientists look down on him. Hes a Fraud, a lier, and greedy bastard.

[fox2]

@walkabout09

How the heck did you come to that conclusion? Yes humans do have an impact on the planet. I never came close to implying that we dont lol.

I said that according to the University of Manitoba, and the Alaskan wildlife service, Polar Bears are doing just fine.

If you are going to make replies on youtube comments, please stay on topic. We are talking about polar bears and you are talking about the ban on DDT and the disaster in the gulf. You are WAY off topic.

[fox2]

@walkabout09

I have no idea what you're talking about. What does the oil leak in the gulf (and you're suggestion that the oil leaking is not a problem) have to do with polar bears?

[cyprusxxx]

lol how can he be sooo right with one issue and sooo wrong with another!!??? i suggest he read operation northwoods, and look at A&E for 911truth who hav over 1201 architectural and engineering professionals sign there pettition

[TheGoodnessIsGood]

Think about it: he's very intelligent, he probably perceived at the time and now, that the climate change treaty / co2 carbon tax was the front charge of the new world order against us and you can't fight all battles at once and win. You have to choose your battles. He has chosen the most imperative one that he felt he could be of use in. If he allowed 911 truth to get muddied up with AGW science it would have had him fighting on two sides instead of one. If so, he did the smart thing.

[markdksc]

I think the reason he stays away from 911 is because

he has to keep focused on one topic and if he came forward demanding a new investigation he could be attacked for being a "crazy conspiracy theorist"

[concujak]

@ 07:35 Can anyone point a source about the polar bear count being 5 times larger ?

[fox2]

@concujak

Popar Bear populations are doing just fine. You can contact the University of Manitoba, there is a unviersity professor from the University who studied Popar bear populations and there overall health. The University found that the polar bears are doing just fine, and are infact nice and fat due to the extra ice in the arctic. It gave the polar bears more time to stay out on the ice and fatten up.

You can also conctact the Alaskan wildlife service. They released a study which show...

[fox2]

@fox2

...They released a study which showed the number of polar bears have been increasing since the 1970's due to laws passed protecting them from hunting.

I have the links to the articles saved somewhere, I will post them up when I find them.

So yes, despite what that lier Al Fraud Gore says...The Poplar Bears are doing just fine.

[SulfurCitizen]

This video should not have stopped there, it should have begun..

[aquariussouldier]

I agree with him completely on the climategate issues and respect and admire his high level reasoning. However, if he bothered to check the 9-11 evidence (Loose Change, The Great Illusion, In Plane Sight, etc) to the same degree, I'm sure he would be left with no other conclusion than the official explanation is completely bogus.  11 of the 19 supposed hijackers are alive and well and knew nothing of the plans, and even the 911 Commissioners now state their report is a farce.

[Watchdis44]

WHY would We Are Change post an interview by this guy? He's just another Noam Chomski. 9-11 was an Inside Job! Watch Loose Change and 9-11 Hidden in Hollywood here on YouTube! This guy is a FAULD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[KingDingaLing090]

@Watchdis44 Whats a "FAULD"?

Loose change has been proven wrong and the guys who made it even admitted it.

[Watchdis44]

Watch 9-11 Hidden in Hollywwod here on YouTube.

[je24t2]

Monckton seems honest. And an honest person will eventually find the truth. He sees the conspiracy for a world government, he seems the blatant lies which can result in the death of millions because of this global warming fraud. He simply has not studied the physics of it. Like anybody else after studying the physics it doesn't matter how strong a preconceived notion you may have about the world you cannot hold to it honestly without being in cognitive dissonance.

[TheConspiracyRealist]

Lost all credibility when he adamantly denied 911 was an inside job.

[TheEbonicslover]

@TheConspiracyRealist he must be on the take. No one with any common sense will say and believe the 20 dumb Arabs attacked the US like no one ever has since WW2 on their own with Norad stand down building 7 and tons of other issues. There is no way that he's being paid or blackmailed to keep his mouth shut about this.

[TheEbonicslover]

smart about the science and dumb about common sense? Did you ask him who pays to say this nonsense that a sane 8 year old would question? Did you confront him with the facts?

[IndrasBlade77]

Monckton is highly intelligent, he knows 911 was an inside job as the evidence proves. He must be distancing himself from it either because he wants to keep conservatives on his side, or because many benefactors would withdraw support or he doesn't want to get killed, or he's controlled opposition from the start.

AGW is a scam. 911 was an inside job.

[badstacksize]

@IndrasBlade77 well put, I agree with you 100% on this point!

[StrongArmGuy]

EXCELLENT !!

Global Warming is ORGANIC and required for planetary stability. The iceland volcano releases more into the atmosphere per minute than man does in a month.

CO2 IS GOOD 4 U

Ask any GREEN and Growing Plants and Trees.!!!

Forget Politicians and a puppet scientific community on the take.

[Kitswain59]

Wow he needs to get informed on 9/11. Did you tell him about nano thermite? BTW....the US Military brass now know that criminal elements in our government (Zionists) and the Israeli Mossad did 9/11. So the new term would be Inside/Outside Job.

[unenergy]

AMERICAN Scientists state that Climate Change is a clear and Present Danger.

May 19, 2010

STRONG EVIDENCE ON CLIMATE CHANGE UNDERSCORES NEED

FOR ACTIONS TO REDUCE EMISSIONS AND BEGIN ADAPTING TO IMPACTS

[911oz]

Only a fool or a liar would say the things Lord Monckton said about 9/11. He is definitely no fool. Which leaves us only one option.

Very disappointing indeed. In my opinion this man is up to mischief. We don't need people like that in this movement.

[calumcoburn]

Agree with Christopher on climate change, disagree with him on 9/11 and invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan.

[TheGoodnessIsGood]

@calumcoburn Yeah, you can't wait for people to be perfect. The fact he's debunking climate change so well is a god send, he hasn't seen the evidence on 911 otherwise if he had, I'm sure he would change his position, although it would have to be a pretty enormous departure from his present position and would probably be uncomfortable for him for a while!

[unenergy]

January 29 2010 Lord Christopher Monckton

"What we are going to contend is that, on the measured evidence, the amount of warming it causes is around 1/6th to 1/7th of what the UN thinks it is."

Lord Monckton May 6 2010

"we end up with is a four fold overstatement of the rate of increase in global temperature that was actually observed if we use the IPCC's methods to calculate what the warming would have been."

Claims of exaggeration have dropped by 1/2 in 3 months. No consistency.

[TheGoodnessIsGood]

@unenergy CONTEXT MOTHERF***ER

[unenergy]

@TheGoodnessIsGood Direct quotes are all that is needed with LCM.

You can fool some of the people all the time, and those are the ones you want to concentrate on.

George W. Bush

[unenergy]

"We are going to concede that Carbon Dioxide and other Greenhouse Gases which possess or mimic a dipole moment, will cause warming if you add them to the atmosphere.

We concede also that human kind is adding CO2 to the atmosphere at about the rate that the NOAA figures mention.

So we're not trying to pretend that we're not the cause of the CO2 in the atmosphere increasing, we're not going to try and pretend that that CO2 will cause no warming."

Lord Christopher Monckton January 19 2010

[luckynumber457]

his mince pies get bigger every time i see him.

[yougiberishtube]

thumbs up

[2wheels88]

I love him his eye's bulge out to make room for his enormous brain and everybody who truly cares about the environment should listen to him because he is truthfull whereas all the globalist environment fascists are just setting up a environmental dictatorship to enslave us, rule every facett of our lives and tax us to the point of poordom but they will do nothing to help the environment because the only green they care about is how much they can stuff their pockets.God Bless Lord Monckton

[MajorBuckSnort]

Where I totally agree with Lord Monckton on AGW/Climate change, he is off the mark on the events of 911, and 07/07. The coincidences of 'Drills" that mirrored the actual events, is just to great.

[katydig]

Hey Steve, Are you gonna post a follow-up on this video? I'm shocked Lord Monckton is so blind regarding 9/11 & the phony war on terror.

[Daen83]

We are a Republic (democratic but nonetheless)!

[sealhunter5]

Monckton has been compromised !

He is now a shill for the NWO!

[katydig]

@sealhunter5 Or he could be blind, like a lot of the politicians in our own country. Everyone needs to see "End Game", "Invisible Empire" & "Fabled Enemies" to have their eyes opened. Three of us "Truthers" in IL are going to send "Don't Tread On Me" DVDs to all our State Reps & Sheriffs. I hope someone sends some of these videos to Lord Monkton.

[painterQjensen]

w w w you tube com / watch ?v=JfA1LpiYk2o

[toranacar]

Argumentum Ad hominem. Learn something new everyday, I knew the left do this just didnt know there was a name for it, I just thought of the left as disgusting ass holes who enjoy rubbishing the person not the argument put forward. Argumentum ad hominem, translation, left wing ass hole.

[sil3ntxOblivion]

have to say watching him speak during the tax day protests in dc made me shiver. his support for ppl like sarah palin is part. a serious problem w/ much of his support and for fox news- that being said, his environmental information is absolutely dead on at least of Climate Change institutes and data- unsure of peak oil, but that's a separate issue.

[Dompl90]

uhhhm al qaeda brought down the towers in a controlled demolition??

how did that happen? xD

[pinoybboy2004]

interesting...so he has amazing reasoning but does not believe that 9/11 was an inside job? or maybe just covering his tail by not jumping on that wagon? i have yet to still understand how buildings fall at free fall speed. heh.

[toranacar]

@pinoybboy2004 Yeah I have become skeptical also, I would say the heat generated by the jet fueled fires were enough to weaken the structure which caused the collapse. I would also agree an inside job is a possibility, I dont mean the US government or President Bush ordered this, that is just ridiculous but I believe there were some people within government and or military who knew "something big" was going to happen as was the case of Pearl Harbor, as a reason to go to war.

[toranacar]

@toranacar Lord Monckton is just fabulous to listen to. Keep up the great work mate.

[chotaboy66]

@toranacar I'm a boilermaker engineering trade ,I'm sorry I have worked with steel all my life I would say the heat from from the initial jet fuel flash would not have collapsed those buildings ,I would state my career on that fire alone would and could not make 3 buildings collaps like a controlled demolition into there own footprint, 100% sure .Monktons a bit lost on some things he has no idea chemtrails even exist, the UK skys are scatterd with them.

[ryanrayonec]

I think it's just an issue he doesn't wanna touch.

[TheEbonicslover]

@ryanrayonec exactly! an average educated person with common sense will find it at least strange how it all played out but extraordinarily smart person like Monckton believes in 20 Arabs shook the the world's superpower...? It's a twilight zone.

[KingDingaLing090]

@pinoybboy2004 9/11 was not an inside job and every informed person in the world knows it. Monkton is dead on accurate. I'm happy that they asked him and I am pleased with his plain simple and direct answer.

The 9/11 conspiracy is a conspiracy.

[PencilsAreAwesome]

@pinoybboy2004

They didn't.

[JohnSmithTheSecond]

@pinoybboy2004 watch screw loose change please

[1madaboutguitar]

Yes but its not necessary in the context of climate change. Some people who believe 9/11 was an inside job believe GW. We shouldn't heavily judge people so much.

Credit to "We are change" for including the part of the interview where he says iraq/Afghanistan were legitimate wars.( although they blatant WERN'T)

[charlienethercoat094]

@pinoybboy2004 i believe the conspiracy too but even if monckton did he still woudn't say so, as he would lose all his respect

[Samsgarden]

@pinoybboy2004

What are you conspiracy crackpots going on about?

[flyingtorpedo]

Mickey Mouse University of Tennesee Al Gore! AL GORE IS A COMPLETE FRAUD!

[HardcoreSalmon]

I think lord monkton is amazing in the environmental movement but why does he support sarah palin.

[ottawafro]

Like Ron Paul, I don't see Monckton himself to 9/11 truth for the same reasons....

[VoodooPolitics1]

@ajsbsd You got that right my friend!

[UtherPendragan]

Lord Monckton would destroy Al Gore in a debate.

[harryman11]

@UtherPendragan with what a dump truck load of money from the oil companies, Lord Monckton would get his ass reemed

[MadBadVoodo]

@UtherPendragan That is a FACT!

[TheMastroAntonio]

@MadBadVoodo Glad you like this, my home Chicago getting the answers.

[robhoneycutt]

@UtherPendragan I would also suggest to you that YOU watch this video produced by Dr Abraham:

watch?v=QpOrjaWlC_E

[robhoneycutt]

@UtherPendragan What he would destroy Gore with lies? That's quite an accomplishment.