The USA would not have bin able to Winn the war if it wasn't for all the other countless country's that played a minor role...so fuck u America you did not win world war 2 the allies did.
why did hitler leave any jews???? I TELL U WHY he said, if i leave the jews whatch what thell do in the future, and he was right, there basturds trying to take palastine and the whole middle east
These films were meant to boost morale in Germany. I'd like to know how the people felt watching the fighting getting closer and closer to home with each new newsreel.
@TerraP i speak some german and this guy ( I THINK ) was talking about how the germans unter den ( den is dead and unter is somthin else, ? ill have to learn more
even as the Wehrmacht was being handed its ass on a plate by the Soviets in those last few months of the war, the Nazi propaganda machine still managed to pull off this kind of shtick... fanatics die hard, but they do die :))
No matter what the reason.. the Axis powers lost and the Allies won. Doesn't matter when USA joined the fight... doesn't matter what mistakes Hitler made... weight of numbers was always going to win... Only thing Hitler could have done was to invade a country and then have relative peace for a few years while they entrenched themselves... blooming lucky he didn't.
Hitler is like youth of today... he wanted it all and he wanted it NOW...!!!!!!!
The German General Staff UNDERESTIMATED Russian strengh by about 75% from the start, add to that the vastness of the country and poor roads,, they deserved to lose.
yes hitler made alot of mistakes that cost him the war and his life. for example,
D-DAY. when men were fighting and diying on those beaches you know what hitler was doing?? sleeping..fucking sleeping..key decision and orders could not be made because hitler took sleeping pills and was not to be awakened. its also been said that hitler won the war and then lost it in eroupe befor america even joined the war.listen n00bs theres a video called how hitler lost the war.look it up and learn something
I believe it Hitler wasn't a freaking moron and hadn't killed his generals for stupid stuff. Like Rommel, and his wife's anniversary, the Allies would have had a long hard fought battle, one that would have cost more lives.
I am not saying that he said they were useless i mean the Brits and canada needed the US just like the US needed us and the canadians. I have got family hat has fought in every war that the UK has been involved in. i am joining the highland division soon and i hope to see our allies the US help us but i dont believe we should be at war at the moment
i know and I'am going to sign up for the marien's in the U.S. and also i got a family tree thats been in every war that the U.S. has been will from WW2 to the iraq war
well i didn't mean to offend you in anyway if i did all i tried to say was that the US needed the Soviets and the British and Canadians in Europe as it was all a join effort and through co operation we won.
hitler never liked the russians but he knew that if russia join tthe war to early while he was still fighting in eruop the war would ended in 43 or 44 may be
hmm... dont think so because the germans wouldve been attacked with USSR as agressor... dont think the western allies wouldve helped USSR so much... secondly after finland winter '39 i doubt they wouldve had the stomach or the organization to do so. In 1940 Stalin issued reorganisation of army which is why in '41 russians were better than in in the winter war against the finnish.
Hitler shud never attacked russia and stayed in europe... make it a impenetrable fortress both from land and sea.
i see what you mean but im taking about when he was in WW1 when he fought the russian then thats is one of the reasons why he lied to stalin when they sign the tearty
The german army beat poland denmark norway yugoslavia holland greece france luxembourg.AND the british army in norway dunkirk greece crete and tobruk TWICE.They were winning against the soviet union up to 1943.
The german war machine was the best equipped in the world.Their weapons were far superior to the allies.Anybody with even a basic knowledge of ww2 knows this.Tiger tank Ng42 Me 262 jet fighter V2 rockets etc. When the allies landed at nomandy most German forces were in russia.
you are right, they were the best. on 1:1 scale they could have easily beaten every army. FRANCE , USA, RUSSIA, BRITAIN, Kanada, had to combine their total forces to overwhelm them. And it still took more than 3-4 years to defeat the Wehrmacht and SS troops. I stress again at that time and on 1:1 scale they were the bravest and best. Nonetheless they lost the war.
Who did they defeat? Poles put up a great fight but were not ready for the German blitz. The French turned tailed! The Russians beat them in the east. The English fought them to a standstill In Egypt. The USA beat them!! Sure it took 4yrs because we had to send troops and material across The Atlantic. Japans defeat was much harder.
Uk beat the germans and italians in north africa kept the japs at bay in the far east in burma. the US liberated france with UK and Canada while the USSR defeated nazi germany.
If japan never attacked the US the US would of allied with Nazi Germany.
The U.S. would never have allied itself with the nazis. Patton wanted to go on to Russia to finish them off using the defeated Germans as allies. Under U.S. command.
No the Us would of allied itself with the Nazi's so they could destroy Communism and also the US government supported the Nazi cause before WW2 started they still sent them supplies using the japs as cover.
Dont know what history book you are reading but its not a U.S. history book. The U.S. knew the nazis were a bigger threat then Japan. Europe needed to be rid of all their kind first. Read real WW2 history.
Why when i live in europe and know my owen continents history why would i wont to read propaganda about the "great gallant US forces "that wanted to invade the USSR straight after the end of WW2?
I have read real WW2 history my great grandfather was a soldier in D-Day and i didn't get very good impressions on US soldiers with the stories he told me.
whta do you mean you didn't get a good impression on US troops thouans of lives including my granddad gave there lives to save eruop from nazi power and what was your granddad names cause he told me storys about D-day and almost everyone in it
The impression he told me was the Brits went in first then the Canadians then the US (this was leading up to the battle of the bulge) and when the US went first they got encircled and needed to be bailed out and that was the last time the US went and attacked large pockets of Nazi defenses. he also said the US were only interested in been the heros and got more brits killed than necessary. He did say they were good help at times though. His name Was Hugh Ross of the highland division.
my granddad told me good things about the highland division liked how they saved him and his company about we got out of the beach and went 18 miles up ahead
The US were massive help every one knows that and Britain would of collapsed and surrendered to the Nazi Imperialism. If the UK fell or the USSR fell then the war was lost and Germany basically secured their victory but they didn't because the US supplied the UK with food and weapons and the USSR we iron willed and fought to the death.
the russian did fight to the death and the U.K. had the greatest air force (RAF) i have ever heared of they were out numbered two to one but they still killed the german air force like littile kids and i dont know how to spell the german air force
yhae thats who i was talking about they had more planes aces and polits but they RAF killed them and that was germandy's second mistake to make him lose the whole war
Britain would not have willingly surrendered, they even had trained groups of civillians trained in sabotage,communications and espionage incase Germanys' operation sealion would have been successful. Surrendering governments do not form these kind of groups they give up the fight and sue for peace. Britain would not have surrendered.
@shay5590 what kind of job in iraq you want to finish. The USA is broke or do you have some money saved? Have you never asked where to get that 800 Billion Dollars?
@AH900112-well the russians need 3 years to Berlin-the wel trained germans 1/2 year to Moscow. Germany fought zhe half World, while the United States of America even cant get Iraq done. Everybody knows if an American Soldiers are weak every time they snivle if a combat lingers...
ozeangruen, the United States is the most powerful country in the world. We have not finished the job in Iraq because the enemy hides behind women and children. Our soldiers give their lives for their country...it is our politicians and the public who complain about lingering conflicts. If you don't like this country, get the fuck out!
Ok Ok you most powerfull country - please explain me- where you take the 800 Billion Dollars to fix your Econmy desaster. the USA is very indebted. I know you will insult me if i tell you that the usa is lending money from china
We have and always have had the bravest troops on this planet.
What color is the sky in your world?
Stop lying to yourself and trying to lie to others, you'll realize not every body listens to stupid people like you who hold a grudge against an entire country for some worthless reason, whatever it is get over it and stop trying to slander my country.
america does Not have the bravest or smartest troops in the worls....remember wietnam...those soldiers thought that they were going to be slaughtered but they still fought until the death..i would appreciate no insulting replys but i know all dipstick assholes will
Crawling through booby trapt tunnels with people who want to kill you in it and in an unfamiliar country 1,000's of miles away from home is really brave...Has your people done that ?
are you trying to say that the taliban, nazis, russians, and japanese are braver than US soldiers, cuz if you are then your wrong on so many levels. sure the american governtment is HORRIBLE and messed up badly, but the soldiers are the bravest in the world.
you think honor is blowing yourselves up, well its just the stupidest shit ever. Hey, the americans are kickin are asses, so instead of fighting till you die (which is honorable) you blow yourselves up cowardly like. also, hiding in the ground, so the enemy cant find you is just another stupid thing to do. Hideing is what thats called. So right now im drawing the conclusion that youre a fuckin misled packie stain, or your a gouk. Which one will it be
so what youre saying is any chump off the street has the mental power to blow himself up at any time, without hesitation? (if its a cowardly thing)
LOL
i love your argunments... HIDING is a stupid tactic in war huh? why does every single army in the world have camo uniform? maybe its so they look real intimidating huh?
how bout flying in a jet and pressing a button to drop a few shells down.. is that considered honerable in your society?
okay yer right about the camo thing. and no actually i think flying in jets and helicopters and planes are stupid.they should just stick with guns.but the reason why there are planes and jets is because some german guy invented the first plane,and from that, other people started inventing other things.like the nuke.i really hate the nuke, because not only does it destroy the land very effectivly, but it also kills millions of innocents.there are no winners or losers in war. what nationality r u
well i dont really have a good understanding of this war thats happening now. as i am only 14. but i kno little parts of it. i do kno a lot of facts and other things about world war 2 though. so yes your right. i was just misunderstanding your view on all this. but now i understand
suicide bombing really isnt the best kind of combat and have you ever noticed how often its more civillians that get killed by this, and you tink thats brave?
I'd take the M2 any day, if you go it then use it, and btw i'm not American, however i do believe that their soldiers are prety brave and so are most other countries.
ofcourse youd take the M2, because you have a chance at living.. that is what you want, you wouldnt be prepared to conciously give up your life to further the efforts of your government.
where did i say it doesnt take balls, actually im sure it does i just dont agree with it myself and in my opinion although in certain apects very affective i dont think its the best form of combat for winning wars, although everyone is entitled to their own opinions on the matter.this is just mine.
again where did i say this? im not talking about any strategies im pointing out my opinion, its no an argument - 1-suicide bombing probably takes balls, 2-i dont agree with suicide bombing,i dont like it, 3- although i dont agree with it, it is still effective, 4-ALL MY OPINION
well the same thing can be said for any person that calls a mortar strike in a war zone
it can kill civilians, America for eg?
ca you really call them brave?, imagine the iraq war but reversed and arabs were dominating the western world and killing american civilians like that.. it would be safe to say there would be some kind of suicide bombings (Keeping in mind the technological advantages)...
my OPINION is that anyone who signs up with the intention of putting themselves in harms way has at least some bravery in them, its my opinion i can say whoever i think is brave im not asking for other people to agree.
where are the technological advantages to suicide bombings?
i think if that were the case then it would've been highly unlikely that the States would've invaded Iraq or at least they wouldn't have been such big players in the war, who invades a country if they think they'll lose the war? no one
mate look,im trying to tell you that if it was IRAQI army dominating US soil with surperior technology to the US army. just imagine if the course of history lead to that event.
you would ASSUME that american patriots or just hill billies even will resist the patrols and whatnot, its in their pride to fight for freedom, right?
who wouldnt fight for the freedom of their own country?
if my country was invvaded then i would and id like to think everyone else would too, i never said anything about people defending their countries did i?
I totally agree with you, ghostmovies, the German army was always an example of organized and successful fighting, most of the time, and if the Germans would have fought with the same number of enemy forces , I doubt any army could withstand the force of the mighty German Army. We must not forget that the present day armies are organized and use weapons with direct link to Germany's WW2 fighting force (except England, UK, Australia, India).
And one more thing, ghostdogmovies (sorry for messing up your name) I always believed that the Germans deserved to win wars, and I am ashamed to be a citizen of the country that betrayed Germany on the 23rd of August 1944, I try all the time to be like the Germans, as their popular image depicts them: clean, ordered , effective, and I am usually hated in my land for my way of thinking and for attacking the scumbags that lead my crappy country. Safety and peace,the best of luck for any German.
The mg was the real killing machine of the German squad, riflemans task was to support the mg. MG-34 and MG-42 were so effective, that the Germans didn't bother much with semi auto rifles.
the mg of a rifle squad or platoon was used as a weapon to support the advance of the rifleman and were not the primary fighting weapon of the infantry
climbon74, the reason they did'nt update their carbiner 98k was is was already battle proven, and they had plenty of them. Though they did create the G43 as a cheap mid 1943 solution to the outdated carbiner 98k. by the way, is anyone needs to know something about any military small arm(pistols, submachine guns,bolt action rifles, automatic rifles, machine guns, and anti tank rifles)send me a message about the one you want to know about!
Cobracarg is right I mean I dont really like them either especially what they did to the Jews. Howver they were master engineers in just about everything. They made milestones in machine gun and artillery research that we still build off of today. Even their ME-262 jet fighter was found to have a safer and more efficient engine then any of britians. If Hitler hadnt taken control himnself his generals who were brilliant tactitions could have made the war last way longer then it even did.
actually they fought well...they did take over most of europe and nearly killed off a group of people,jews. i mean i dont like what they did but they did fight well. i mean it took the us britain canada russia french and many more countries to finally take down the germans
The USA would not have bin able to Winn the war if it wasn't for all the other countless country's that played a minor role...so fuck u America you did not win world war 2 the allies did.
cheezBurger420 8 months ago
Comment removed
qzetu 8 months ago
CHODE MUNCHER DONT EVEN SPEEK HIS NAME YOU GERMAN SUCKING PEICE OF SHIT
Chainsaw2468 11 months ago
@MattGodden123 haha lol your right.
bore10man 1 year ago
why did hitler leave any jews???? I TELL U WHY he said, if i leave the jews whatch what thell do in the future, and he was right, there basturds trying to take palastine and the whole middle east
bore10man 1 year ago
@bore10man learn how to spell before you attempt to "educate" the entire internet you racist bastArd...
KarmicJuggernaut 1 year ago
@KarmicJuggernaut haha i laugh at you.
jew
bore10man 1 year ago
And finaly you suck Russian dick.Pretenders to be a superhuman.
aluston91 1 year ago
LOL LOL LOL LOL got your ass kicked krauts by USA HOOAH MOTHER FUCKER NAZIS
GanjaBeard510 1 year ago
@GanjaBeard510
USA-s wallstreet jews brought hitler to power...americans died fighting..so the LOL is pretty much on you...
taipohh 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
LOL LOL LOL LOL
GanjaBeard510 1 year ago
DEUTSCHLAND FOREVER
WillProtoss 1 year ago
Comment removed
Rico8458 1 year ago
@Rico8458 really????
scarydance3 1 year ago
@Rico8458 the germans asked, but the ameircans r smart and found out what shitler was doing ( hitler ) so they went against him
bore10man 1 year ago
Good thing I know German :)
bluewolfer 1 year ago 2
the ironic part was Hitler was one fourth jewish...imagine that
drummer1269 1 year ago
Big War..anyway I'd like captions, but whatever its still very good video, Thanks
bingramtube 1 year ago
These films were meant to boost morale in Germany. I'd like to know how the people felt watching the fighting getting closer and closer to home with each new newsreel.
cristop5 1 year ago 4
haha, schöne propaganda!
0:35
"Flak und Panzernahbekämpfung räumen unter den Panzerkolossen GEWALTIG auf!"
LOL
TerraP 2 years ago
@TerraP i speak some german and this guy ( I THINK ) was talking about how the germans unter den ( den is dead and unter is somthin else, ? ill have to learn more
can u teach me
bore10man 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@bore10man
"Flak und Panzernahbekämpfung räumen unter den Panzerkolossen GEWALTIG auf!"
"unter den (Panzerkolossen)" means in this case "among the (tanks)"
Flak and close-anti-tank-combat is powerfully tidying up among the ( enemy ) tanks.
I guess you cant say that in english so its rather "get rid of" instead of "tidying up".
Hope that helped somehow, my english isnt the best.
TerraP 1 week ago
the importance of this video is that it has proof that ventless M42 helmets were in use late in the war. collectors call them M45s... fun stuff.
Rawego 2 years ago
even as the Wehrmacht was being handed its ass on a plate by the Soviets in those last few months of the war, the Nazi propaganda machine still managed to pull off this kind of shtick... fanatics die hard, but they do die :))
Rawego 2 years ago
And what exactly, falcon, do you mean by like the youth of today?
Bold statement to compare the future to hitler....
Hatham 2 years ago
No matter what the reason.. the Axis powers lost and the Allies won. Doesn't matter when USA joined the fight... doesn't matter what mistakes Hitler made... weight of numbers was always going to win... Only thing Hitler could have done was to invade a country and then have relative peace for a few years while they entrenched themselves... blooming lucky he didn't.
Hitler is like youth of today... he wanted it all and he wanted it NOW...!!!!!!!
FalconXE302 2 years ago
Ah the Eastern front one the most blodyest batles were there kursk
and others. German armor vs Russian armor combat as my own opion
is that German tanks were more up to date in there tanks ans radios the Russians have numbers that the only way thay won the Eastern front
DukeofSahara 2 years ago
The German General Staff UNDERESTIMATED Russian strengh by about 75% from the start, add to that the vastness of the country and poor roads,, they deserved to lose.
jakefree25 2 years ago
yes hitler made alot of mistakes that cost him the war and his life. for example,
D-DAY. when men were fighting and diying on those beaches you know what hitler was doing?? sleeping..fucking sleeping..key decision and orders could not be made because hitler took sleeping pills and was not to be awakened. its also been said that hitler won the war and then lost it in eroupe befor america even joined the war.listen n00bs theres a video called how hitler lost the war.look it up and learn something
skatering42 2 years ago
I believe it Hitler wasn't a freaking moron and hadn't killed his generals for stupid stuff. Like Rommel, and his wife's anniversary, the Allies would have had a long hard fought battle, one that would have cost more lives.
Darthvader1551 2 years ago
six years seems like a pretty long time to me
kirk885 2 years ago
Lol Nazi propaganda bullshit.
Mutrino 2 years ago
dump as
ukdfgg 2 years ago
nie wieder Krieg
derHistoriker 2 years ago 7
german bullshit!!
Bennydamaster 2 years ago
STFU bitch
InimeneEestist 2 years ago
The german airforce was the most advanced on earth.
jimmy27paul 2 years ago 4
at the time, its unfortunate, but yes they were. it was amazing the way hitler revolutionized warfare.
chodemuncher112 2 years ago 7
@chodemuncher112 Its wasnt hitler. It was his generals.
pauls317 1 year ago
@pauls317 lol i was about to type the same thing to him but then i saw your comment. 100% agree his generals did everything not hitler.
Tracer564 1 year ago
@chodemuncher112 dude wtf is with your name
mcspankyman1 1 year ago 4
@chodemuncher112
wasnt hitler. was guderian. Hitler was a fool who (thankfully) continually made strategic errors going against his generals' will.
IcyScythe 1 year ago 2
The german pilots didnt have enough fuel to fight over britain.Just enough to drop their bombs and fly home.A major reason for their defeat.
jimmy27paul 2 years ago
the eastern fornt was the bloody's fornt in the whole war because you were died going to die or you was a trained soldier
marienman 2 years ago
I am not saying that he said they were useless i mean the Brits and canada needed the US just like the US needed us and the canadians. I have got family hat has fought in every war that the UK has been involved in. i am joining the highland division soon and i hope to see our allies the US help us but i dont believe we should be at war at the moment
shuggy1991 2 years ago
i know and I'am going to sign up for the marien's in the U.S. and also i got a family tree thats been in every war that the U.S. has been will from WW2 to the iraq war
marienman 2 years ago
well i didn't mean to offend you in anyway if i did all i tried to say was that the US needed the Soviets and the British and Canadians in Europe as it was all a join effort and through co operation we won.
shuggy1991 2 years ago
you didnt your fine
marienman 2 years ago
Thats sweet my tree is similar but goes back to the spanish american war, but i think we missed korea.
Himmelmann16 2 years ago
hitler never liked the russians but he knew that if russia join tthe war to early while he was still fighting in eruop the war would ended in 43 or 44 may be
marienman 2 years ago
hmm... dont think so because the germans wouldve been attacked with USSR as agressor... dont think the western allies wouldve helped USSR so much... secondly after finland winter '39 i doubt they wouldve had the stomach or the organization to do so. In 1940 Stalin issued reorganisation of army which is why in '41 russians were better than in in the winter war against the finnish.
Hitler shud never attacked russia and stayed in europe... make it a impenetrable fortress both from land and sea.
ralphklunder 2 years ago
i see what you mean but im taking about when he was in WW1 when he fought the russian then thats is one of the reasons why he lied to stalin when they sign the tearty
marienman 2 years ago
As an old British royal marine commando said to me..
"We didn't beat the Germans- we overwhelmed them"
JoeDiversion 2 years ago
The german army beat poland denmark norway yugoslavia holland greece france luxembourg.AND the british army in norway dunkirk greece crete and tobruk TWICE.They were winning against the soviet union up to 1943.
jimmy27paul 2 years ago
The german war machine was the best equipped in the world.Their weapons were far superior to the allies.Anybody with even a basic knowledge of ww2 knows this.Tiger tank Ng42 Me 262 jet fighter V2 rockets etc. When the allies landed at nomandy most German forces were in russia.
jimmy27paul 2 years ago 2
What tank was that at 1:19?
Vicksburg63 2 years ago
looks like a Marder III
1jammn57Dewd 2 years ago
great film. :44-:49 those fellas are LOBBING some mortar shells. damn.
nagasama75 2 years ago
Excellent footage, thanks for posting.
Silberdachs 3 years ago
i really dont think we would ahve won the war if the dumbass nazis didnt attack russia
indiana9947 3 years ago
german soldiers are the best of the world
sniperBF2king 3 years ago
if there the best, how come they always loose?
666seraph666 3 years ago 3
You must be joking. The Soviet soldier was just as hardy. The American, British and Japanese soldiers would easily give them a run for their money.
DannyBoy777777 2 years ago 2
you are right, they were the best. on 1:1 scale they could have easily beaten every army. FRANCE , USA, RUSSIA, BRITAIN, Kanada, had to combine their total forces to overwhelm them. And it still took more than 3-4 years to defeat the Wehrmacht and SS troops. I stress again at that time and on 1:1 scale they were the bravest and best. Nonetheless they lost the war.
Sakirben 2 years ago
Who did they defeat? Poles put up a great fight but were not ready for the German blitz. The French turned tailed! The Russians beat them in the east. The English fought them to a standstill In Egypt. The USA beat them!! Sure it took 4yrs because we had to send troops and material across The Atlantic. Japans defeat was much harder.
agamick 2 years ago
Uk beat the germans and italians in north africa kept the japs at bay in the far east in burma. the US liberated france with UK and Canada while the USSR defeated nazi germany.
If japan never attacked the US the US would of allied with Nazi Germany.
shuggy1991 2 years ago
The U.S. would never have allied itself with the nazis. Patton wanted to go on to Russia to finish them off using the defeated Germans as allies. Under U.S. command.
agamick 2 years ago
No the Us would of allied itself with the Nazi's so they could destroy Communism and also the US government supported the Nazi cause before WW2 started they still sent them supplies using the japs as cover.
shuggy1991 2 years ago
Dont know what history book you are reading but its not a U.S. history book. The U.S. knew the nazis were a bigger threat then Japan. Europe needed to be rid of all their kind first. Read real WW2 history.
agamick 2 years ago
Why when i live in europe and know my owen continents history why would i wont to read propaganda about the "great gallant US forces "that wanted to invade the USSR straight after the end of WW2?
I have read real WW2 history my great grandfather was a soldier in D-Day and i didn't get very good impressions on US soldiers with the stories he told me.
shuggy1991 2 years ago
whta do you mean you didn't get a good impression on US troops thouans of lives including my granddad gave there lives to save eruop from nazi power and what was your granddad names cause he told me storys about D-day and almost everyone in it
marienman 2 years ago
The impression he told me was the Brits went in first then the Canadians then the US (this was leading up to the battle of the bulge) and when the US went first they got encircled and needed to be bailed out and that was the last time the US went and attacked large pockets of Nazi defenses. he also said the US were only interested in been the heros and got more brits killed than necessary. He did say they were good help at times though. His name Was Hugh Ross of the highland division.
shuggy1991 2 years ago
my granddad told me good things about the highland division liked how they saved him and his company about we got out of the beach and went 18 miles up ahead
marienman 2 years ago
The US were massive help every one knows that and Britain would of collapsed and surrendered to the Nazi Imperialism. If the UK fell or the USSR fell then the war was lost and Germany basically secured their victory but they didn't because the US supplied the UK with food and weapons and the USSR we iron willed and fought to the death.
shuggy1991 2 years ago
the russian did fight to the death and the U.K. had the greatest air force (RAF) i have ever heared of they were out numbered two to one but they still killed the german air force like littile kids and i dont know how to spell the german air force
marienman 2 years ago
Luftwaffe lol.
AsianFascist 2 years ago
yhae thats who i was talking about they had more planes aces and polits but they RAF killed them and that was germandy's second mistake to make him lose the whole war
marienman 2 years ago
If Germany continued their bomb rades on Britain maybe the had surrendered. But they kept fighting.
aretherenamesleft9 2 years ago
Britain would not have willingly surrendered, they even had trained groups of civillians trained in sabotage,communications and espionage incase Germanys' operation sealion would have been successful. Surrendering governments do not form these kind of groups they give up the fight and sue for peace. Britain would not have surrendered.
kirk885 2 years ago
Comment removed
marienman 2 years ago
the german soldiers were the devils on earth
YeahSure72 2 years ago
i agree
marienman 2 years ago
poke smot
distortedeskimos 3 years ago
ficken nazi
salsburysteak8 3 years ago
ghostdogmovies blablabla snoozzzzzzzzzzz
ozeangruen 3 years ago
@shay5590 what kind of job in iraq you want to finish. The USA is broke or do you have some money saved? Have you never asked where to get that 800 Billion Dollars?
ozeangruen 3 years ago
Damn near every country of the allies is going broke you nimrod, only America is always in the spotlight to see.
ghostdogmovies 3 years ago
Германские войска героически бегут от трусливых большевитских орд)) геббельс-стайл-пропаганда
kalashnikov77rus 3 years ago
very nice movie keep it upp ..... though most of it was just german propaganda
milfchannel 3 years ago
@AH900112-well the russians need 3 years to Berlin-the wel trained germans 1/2 year to Moscow. Germany fought zhe half World, while the United States of America even cant get Iraq done. Everybody knows if an American Soldiers are weak every time they snivle if a combat lingers...
ozeangruen 3 years ago
ozeangruen, the United States is the most powerful country in the world. We have not finished the job in Iraq because the enemy hides behind women and children. Our soldiers give their lives for their country...it is our politicians and the public who complain about lingering conflicts. If you don't like this country, get the fuck out!
Shay5590 3 years ago
Ok Ok you most powerfull country - please explain me- where you take the 800 Billion Dollars to fix your Econmy desaster. the USA is very indebted. I know you will insult me if i tell you that the usa is lending money from china
ozeangruen 3 years ago
borrowing not lending,lol
jeffsky2008 3 years ago
We have and always have had the bravest troops on this planet.
What color is the sky in your world?
Stop lying to yourself and trying to lie to others, you'll realize not every body listens to stupid people like you who hold a grudge against an entire country for some worthless reason, whatever it is get over it and stop trying to slander my country.
ghostdogmovies 3 years ago 3
america does Not have the bravest or smartest troops in the worls....remember wietnam...those soldiers thought that they were going to be slaughtered but they still fought until the death..i would appreciate no insulting replys but i know all dipstick assholes will
popman638 3 years ago
lmao, american soldiers the bravest ?? haha
masacrist 3 years ago
Crawling through booby trapt tunnels with people who want to kill you in it and in an unfamiliar country 1,000's of miles away from home is really brave...Has your people done that ?
RESILIENT1AMERICA 3 years ago
no, we dont really invade other countries on a regular basis like the "brave" US...
my people have been fighting brutal wars against tyrants like america before your country even existed.
have a nice day
masacrist 3 years ago
are you trying to say that the taliban, nazis, russians, and japanese are braver than US soldiers, cuz if you are then your wrong on so many levels. sure the american governtment is HORRIBLE and messed up badly, but the soldiers are the bravest in the world.
distortedeskimos 3 years ago
how so my friend please explain.
how many american soldiers are willing to strap explosives to themselves and accept death?
not many, theyre happy sitting behind the M2 inside their armoured vehicle
masacrist 3 years ago
you think honor is blowing yourselves up, well its just the stupidest shit ever. Hey, the americans are kickin are asses, so instead of fighting till you die (which is honorable) you blow yourselves up cowardly like. also, hiding in the ground, so the enemy cant find you is just another stupid thing to do. Hideing is what thats called. So right now im drawing the conclusion that youre a fuckin misled packie stain, or your a gouk. Which one will it be
distortedeskimos 3 years ago
when did i say ANYTHING about honour?
so what youre saying is any chump off the street has the mental power to blow himself up at any time, without hesitation? (if its a cowardly thing)
LOL
i love your argunments... HIDING is a stupid tactic in war huh? why does every single army in the world have camo uniform? maybe its so they look real intimidating huh?
how bout flying in a jet and pressing a button to drop a few shells down.. is that considered honerable in your society?
masacrist 3 years ago
okay yer right about the camo thing. and no actually i think flying in jets and helicopters and planes are stupid.they should just stick with guns.but the reason why there are planes and jets is because some german guy invented the first plane,and from that, other people started inventing other things.like the nuke.i really hate the nuke, because not only does it destroy the land very effectivly, but it also kills millions of innocents.there are no winners or losers in war. what nationality r u
distortedeskimos 3 years ago
you clearly dont know much about warfare, how old are you? im guessing around 14?
"stick" to guns?
if people in charge had your mentality we would be fighting with swords and shields today.
you hate the nuke ey? funny how it was your government that used it in the first place, on an entire city.
im serbian and i live in aust...
what does my nationality or where i live have anything to do with my thinking?
sorry im not a brainwashed sheep like you..
masacrist 3 years ago
wow. your australian, and your siding with the gouks and the pakiestains. pathetic
distortedeskimos 3 years ago
go carrya swag you fag
distortedeskimos 3 years ago
im not siding with anyone, when did i say i support any faction?
im just saying what makes your cause any better than the mujahadeens???
masacrist 3 years ago
you do make a very good point. you were right on this one. wait...what the fuck is mujahadeeeeeeen
distortedeskimos 3 years ago
exactley, you have very little understanding on warfare or even the basics of whats going on in our world today.
its a muslim group, they fight all over the world , iraq, chechnya, bosnia, somalia ect
masacrist 3 years ago
well i dont really have a good understanding of this war thats happening now. as i am only 14. but i kno little parts of it. i do kno a lot of facts and other things about world war 2 though. so yes your right. i was just misunderstanding your view on all this. but now i understand
distortedeskimos 3 years ago
they are radical islamic guerillas in afghanistan
themgoodpancakes 3 years ago
suicide bombing really isnt the best kind of combat and have you ever noticed how often its more civillians that get killed by this, and you tink thats brave?
I'd take the M2 any day, if you go it then use it, and btw i'm not American, however i do believe that their soldiers are prety brave and so are most other countries.
kirk885 2 years ago
ofcourse youd take the M2, because you have a chance at living.. that is what you want, you wouldnt be prepared to conciously give up your life to further the efforts of your government.
so dont say suicide bombing doesnt take balls...
im not saying i agree with anyones agenda btw.
masacrist 2 years ago
where did i say it doesnt take balls, actually im sure it does i just dont agree with it myself and in my opinion although in certain apects very affective i dont think its the best form of combat for winning wars, although everyone is entitled to their own opinions on the matter.this is just mine.
kirk885 2 years ago
"and you think thats brave?"
brave in the modern culture can basically be described as having balls, so
and ofcourse any half witted commander wouldnt use suicide bombings alone .. they do ambushes and IED attacks, even rockets and mortars..
masacrist 2 years ago
again where did i say this? im not talking about any strategies im pointing out my opinion, its no an argument - 1-suicide bombing probably takes balls, 2-i dont agree with suicide bombing,i dont like it, 3- although i dont agree with it, it is still effective, 4-ALL MY OPINION
kirk885 2 years ago
dude , scroll down with your middle mouse button.
masacrist 2 years ago
i said im sure it takes balls, i never said suicide bombers are brave
kirk885 2 years ago
well the same thing can be said for any person that calls a mortar strike in a war zone
it can kill civilians, America for eg?
ca you really call them brave?, imagine the iraq war but reversed and arabs were dominating the western world and killing american civilians like that.. it would be safe to say there would be some kind of suicide bombings (Keeping in mind the technological advantages)...
masacrist 2 years ago
my OPINION is that anyone who signs up with the intention of putting themselves in harms way has at least some bravery in them, its my opinion i can say whoever i think is brave im not asking for other people to agree.
where are the technological advantages to suicide bombings?
kirk885 2 years ago 2
im talking technological advancements reversed, as in american military technology is at the level of the iraqi people now.
masacrist 2 years ago
i think if that were the case then it would've been highly unlikely that the States would've invaded Iraq or at least they wouldn't have been such big players in the war, who invades a country if they think they'll lose the war? no one
kirk885 2 years ago
mate look,im trying to tell you that if it was IRAQI army dominating US soil with surperior technology to the US army. just imagine if the course of history lead to that event.
you would ASSUME that american patriots or just hill billies even will resist the patrols and whatnot, its in their pride to fight for freedom, right?
masacrist 2 years ago 2
who wouldnt fight for the freedom of their own country?
if my country was invvaded then i would and id like to think everyone else would too, i never said anything about people defending their countries did i?
kirk885 2 years ago
I totally agree with you, ghostmovies, the German army was always an example of organized and successful fighting, most of the time, and if the Germans would have fought with the same number of enemy forces , I doubt any army could withstand the force of the mighty German Army. We must not forget that the present day armies are organized and use weapons with direct link to Germany's WW2 fighting force (except England, UK, Australia, India).
jaspercharliestephen 3 years ago
And one more thing, ghostdogmovies (sorry for messing up your name) I always believed that the Germans deserved to win wars, and I am ashamed to be a citizen of the country that betrayed Germany on the 23rd of August 1944, I try all the time to be like the Germans, as their popular image depicts them: clean, ordered , effective, and I am usually hated in my land for my way of thinking and for attacking the scumbags that lead my crappy country. Safety and peace,the best of luck for any German.
jaspercharliestephen 3 years ago
are you russian
distortedeskimos 3 years ago
lol and nice racist remarks btw too. good job
masacrist 3 years ago
The mg was the real killing machine of the German squad, riflemans task was to support the mg. MG-34 and MG-42 were so effective, that the Germans didn't bother much with semi auto rifles.
Laestadius 3 years ago
the mg of a rifle squad or platoon was used as a weapon to support the advance of the rifleman and were not the primary fighting weapon of the infantry
rbvfc13colby 3 years ago
climbon74, the reason they did'nt update their carbiner 98k was is was already battle proven, and they had plenty of them. Though they did create the G43 as a cheap mid 1943 solution to the outdated carbiner 98k. by the way, is anyone needs to know something about any military small arm(pistols, submachine guns,bolt action rifles, automatic rifles, machine guns, and anti tank rifles)send me a message about the one you want to know about!
p3ople200 3 years ago
tell me more about the Mosin-Nagant was it better then the 98k?
danbarnosu 3 years ago
German snipers preferred the M-N to their own rifles
martydrooo 3 years ago
so the Mosin-Nagant is better :-O
danbarnosu 3 years ago
Never could figure out why they didn't improve there main infrantry rifle, the M-1 Grarand out did the Germans bolt action.
climbon74 3 years ago
Check out the G43.
Silnius 3 years ago
m-1 garand was a good rifle but its could get jammed like most guns from WW2
Bbturtle35 3 years ago
Cobracarg is right I mean I dont really like them either especially what they did to the Jews. Howver they were master engineers in just about everything. They made milestones in machine gun and artillery research that we still build off of today. Even their ME-262 jet fighter was found to have a safer and more efficient engine then any of britians. If Hitler hadnt taken control himnself his generals who were brilliant tactitions could have made the war last way longer then it even did.
Joseph565112 3 years ago 5
I think this was an Italian propaganda video featuring their German allies
MexicanoVeintisiete 4 years ago 2
the germans documented many films early in the war, not knowing they would get their assses kicked in
rvhawkeye 4 years ago
actually they fought well...they did take over most of europe and nearly killed off a group of people,jews. i mean i dont like what they did but they did fight well. i mean it took the us britain canada russia french and many more countries to finally take down the germans
cobracarg 3 years ago 4
it`s just with german troops?i fucking hate them.excellent footage.
rapazitu90 4 years ago
That is really a quite amazing peice of war footage.
Draious 4 years ago 5
Cool.
ww2fan39 4 years ago 2