I'll bet that Sen. Shmuck-e shummer (D) has a gun on or near him for his protection as well as Sen. Diane Frankenstein (D) has one on her. It's OK for the anti-gunners to pack heat but for Us law-abiding, We can't protect ourselves. We just have to wait for the Cop's to show up & outline our bodies with white tape & place Us in a BODY BAG.
For those of you who never fired a gun & think their ICKY, go out & try it, You just might like it.
That is the most liberal scumbag comment ive heard in a while. Would you rather have people walking around with handguns shown in plain sight? Thought so go back to canada asshole.
Second: I didn't mention ONCE that I want people walking with weapon in plain sight. If you knew how to read, I am for more restrictions on weapon. In very simple term, it means I want people NOT to carry handguns. Stop making excuses to insult me for your lack of reading.
3rd: I didn't come from Canada. You really need to go back to school and learn to read. Nobody should ever let you buy a gun. It is too dangerous to have idiots have guns.
I am going to respond to this one, there is somebody I know he lives in California and has suffered multiple death threats, he applied to carry a concealed firearm in fear of his life, he was denied because the sheriff dosent want people to carry weapons
I hope he get helped by the FBI or something. This is not acceptable to received death threats.
But I doubt a gun will save him. If these people really want him dead, they will suprise him/snipe him and there is nothing he can do. It is not like the bad guys will come and introduce himself like in a movie and shoot him after everyone draw their gun. It will come as a total surprise, and he will not have time to even draw his gun imo... well if I was the bad guy that's how I will do it.
this won't keep anyone safer!!!!!!!!!!! Bad guys bring guns wherever they want-- normal Americans now cannot bring them to defend themselves - good luck when you need some good citizen to save you.
Sen. Chuck U Shummer made the comment that many lives will be saved because this bill failed?
Hes the lying devil that killed the Congresssional investigation of the 1993 Waco Texas Massacre of the Branch Dividians in which 67 innocent souls were murdered by the Government. He was a constant supporter that the Government was pure as snow in its actions. Which is a horrible lie as the facts of the raid have now revealed.
And you are a fat white American trash who don't never travel outside and eat fast food non stop and can't point America on a map. How about you stop insulting people and making retarded stereotypes for a change? You think because you are born in this country that somehow you own it and I have no right? Go read your right you moron.
no you don't you pile of euro trash. The bill of rights is for Americans not euro trash that comes here wanting to change the country as europe. Youy want europe, go back to europe.
no you pile of American fat trash. The bill of rights is for ALL Americans citizens. This country came from a mixture of colonies from EUROPE. Without them, America would not exist. In America, we use the best of everywhere. If you think the system of Heal care in Canada is good, then we should implement something similar. If we think France has something good, then we copy it (motion picture). We need people with brain, something you obviously don't have, you xenophobe fat idiot.
no we need pricks like you from othet countries scanned. if you are coming to the uSA with one dislike about the country you're not let in. if you get here and find you don't like the health care system, loaded on the next plane a sent back.
WTF do you know about me? You make stupid assumptions just based on one word you found on my profile. You don't even know how long I have been here and where I worked. What kind of idiot are you? You are such a xenophobe I would not even be surprised if you were also racist. You are a disgrace of the USA. This is one of the many reasons why guns should be more restricted because of idiots like yourself who may end up killing innocent people just because everyone are not white American.
No I don't want lunatics who insult people based on their origins for no good reasons to have guns. It is like giving a gun to an insane person and expect him to use it only to defend himself.
They are lunatics. If they were not, they would not say crazy stuff about a country in Europe/Canada just because I am against guns. They will not ask me to leave the country and consider me not a citizen. That's crazy. That's being a lunatic. it is more than just voicing your opinion strongly when you have no fact but do only insults. Therefore, I am 100% stand that people like standforamerica are bunch of lunatics who get easily anger and should never own a gun.
Well see that is your opinion, I dont happen to agree but lets move on, what measures do you support? And if you feel comfortable with stating (you don't have to if you don't want to) whether you would be of a conservative or liberal viewpoint?
I don't have many rules actually regarding guns regulation but there is one I was thinking for a while and I think it makes sense: limit the number of guns anyone can own to 100. It is a made up number of course, but I think if you have 100 guns, it should be enough to defend yourself and hunt. If you are buying more, it is probably for selling them (ex: Mexico) or for gang purpose...
There are a lot of collectors out there. And I must clear up th number of weapons going to Mexico, BATFE traces for less than 10% originated from the US, and that include the Colt M-16's that the US government sells them, most of the weapons can (if the Mexican government would co-operate which they dont) probably be traced back to their military or other outside sources (Norinco AK-47's).
standforamerica have just prove my point over and over. If I disagree with them, they don't want me in "their" country like their own it or something. total BS.
One of things that is great about this country people have the freedom to voice their opinions, 1st amendment right, and the 2nd makes sure the government cant go crazy on the first.
WTF is this law supposed to stop besides people with permits from defending themselves? Criminals don't give a shit about these silly laws. Hell, they'll smuggle anything they want cross-state, and cross-borders. Ask Mexico, drowning in "made in the USA" weapons
I agree, except that USA weapons going to Mexico is propaganda from the Left. The like automatic weapons down there and they aren't getting them from here. They can get them from the boat load elsewhere.
The measure is so irrelevant anyway. The states can't make laws infringing the 2nd Amendment right of all citizens. I try to avoid the infringer states when I travel. These states set up peaceful travelers to be victims when they restrict our right to travel armed.
Interesting debate. States' rights clearly favor rejection of the amendment, but with the 2nd and 14th Amendments to the Constitution, do the states really have the right to restrict concealed weapons anyway? For real constitutional purists, this has to be the right decision because the founders would have left it entirely to the states seeing no role whatsoever for the Federal government.
DID YOU READ WHAT I SAID? I said that it's good that the senate doesn't want people taking concealed weapons across state lines, because that means the government isn't in control of us. People are going to keep doing whatever they want.
The opposite? I want complete chaos. Only once the government is at our knees, we can improve it. I'm tired of all this Washington lobbying and politics before people. It gets us NOWHERE.
Ipodkiller6, revolutions generally swap one bunch of thugs for a new set, because revolutions don't change the nature of man. America had the blessing of having some pretty wise and upright Founding Fathers. That is very unusual.
Which is it, Schumer? States or Feds? If he opposes this measure because of states' rights, then he SHOULD oppose any federal-level restrictions.
Something tells me he won't...
zeppelinesque 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Beachman42
"it is a state's right to determine if someone should be allowed to carry"
OK genius, I live in NYC and you want to throw my faith into hands of crooks like Mike Bloomberg and Chuck Shumer? Thanks a lot moron, thanks a lot!
"This law would have forced the issue down the throats of states like California "
If California has chosen to violate 2nd amendment, it's good that someone can come and slap their wrist. Get it now genius?
nick10463 1 year ago
agreed ipod :)
cameron9111175 2 years ago
I'll bet that Sen. Shmuck-e shummer (D) has a gun on or near him for his protection as well as Sen. Diane Frankenstein (D) has one on her. It's OK for the anti-gunners to pack heat but for Us law-abiding, We can't protect ourselves. We just have to wait for the Cop's to show up & outline our bodies with white tape & place Us in a BODY BAG.
For those of you who never fired a gun & think their ICKY, go out & try it, You just might like it.
Do it B4 the lib's take them away!!!.
ShogunBob 2 years ago
Another blow to freedom.
ThndersRage 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Guns do not kill people...People kill people period end of story
If you need to hide your weapon chances are you are up to no good.
andreacanadian 2 years ago
That is the most liberal scumbag comment ive heard in a while. Would you rather have people walking around with handguns shown in plain sight? Thought so go back to canada asshole.
rcman123 2 years ago
First: I am not a liberal you moron.
Second: I didn't mention ONCE that I want people walking with weapon in plain sight. If you knew how to read, I am for more restrictions on weapon. In very simple term, it means I want people NOT to carry handguns. Stop making excuses to insult me for your lack of reading.
3rd: I didn't come from Canada. You really need to go back to school and learn to read. Nobody should ever let you buy a gun. It is too dangerous to have idiots have guns.
yes4me 2 years ago
I am going to respond to this one, there is somebody I know he lives in California and has suffered multiple death threats, he applied to carry a concealed firearm in fear of his life, he was denied because the sheriff dosent want people to carry weapons
chaostheoryfilms 2 years ago
I hope he get helped by the FBI or something. This is not acceptable to received death threats.
But I doubt a gun will save him. If these people really want him dead, they will suprise him/snipe him and there is nothing he can do. It is not like the bad guys will come and introduce himself like in a movie and shoot him after everyone draw their gun. It will come as a total surprise, and he will not have time to even draw his gun imo... well if I was the bad guy that's how I will do it.
yes4me 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
urbanprophet777 2 years ago
this won't keep anyone safer!!!!!!!!!!! Bad guys bring guns wherever they want-- normal Americans now cannot bring them to defend themselves - good luck when you need some good citizen to save you.
lenny380 2 years ago
I hate gun nuts and think they are manchildren so this makes me happy.
Joe402 2 years ago
Sen. Chuck U Shummer made the comment that many lives will be saved because this bill failed?
Hes the lying devil that killed the Congresssional investigation of the 1993 Waco Texas Massacre of the Branch Dividians in which 67 innocent souls were murdered by the Government. He was a constant supporter that the Government was pure as snow in its actions. Which is a horrible lie as the facts of the raid have now revealed.
Search Youtube: Waco Texas Massacre.
Shummer Video Footage.
4U2TakeBackAmerica 2 years ago
finally a win for gun control... this country already has too many gun freedom imo 5/5
yes4me 2 years ago
You need to reread the Constitution dude,
chaostheoryfilms 2 years ago
no I don't need to. The senate knows the constitution and said no to that. End of story.
yes4me 2 years ago
So you support more gun control?
chaostheoryfilms 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
So you support more gun control?
chaostheoryfilms 2 years ago
You're just more euro scum that move to the USA wanting just like your worthless country you left.
"Hometown: Paris, France"
don't like it here move your worthless french ass back.
standforamerica 2 years ago
And you are a fat white American trash who don't never travel outside and eat fast food non stop and can't point America on a map. How about you stop insulting people and making retarded stereotypes for a change? You think because you are born in this country that somehow you own it and I have no right? Go read your right you moron.
yes4me 2 years ago
no you don't you pile of euro trash. The bill of rights is for Americans not euro trash that comes here wanting to change the country as europe. Youy want europe, go back to europe.
standforamerica 2 years ago
no you pile of American fat trash. The bill of rights is for ALL Americans citizens. This country came from a mixture of colonies from EUROPE. Without them, America would not exist. In America, we use the best of everywhere. If you think the system of Heal care in Canada is good, then we should implement something similar. If we think France has something good, then we copy it (motion picture). We need people with brain, something you obviously don't have, you xenophobe fat idiot.
yes4me 2 years ago
no we need pricks like you from othet countries scanned. if you are coming to the uSA with one dislike about the country you're not let in. if you get here and find you don't like the health care system, loaded on the next plane a sent back.
standforamerica 2 years ago
WTF do you know about me? You make stupid assumptions just based on one word you found on my profile. You don't even know how long I have been here and where I worked. What kind of idiot are you? You are such a xenophobe I would not even be surprised if you were also racist. You are a disgrace of the USA. This is one of the many reasons why guns should be more restricted because of idiots like yourself who may end up killing innocent people just because everyone are not white American.
yes4me 2 years ago
I see you don't want people who disagree with you to own firearms,
chaostheoryfilms 2 years ago
No I don't want lunatics who insult people based on their origins for no good reasons to have guns. It is like giving a gun to an insane person and expect him to use it only to defend himself.
yes4me 2 years ago
They are not lunatics, just voicing their opinion strongly,
chaostheoryfilms 2 years ago
They are lunatics. If they were not, they would not say crazy stuff about a country in Europe/Canada just because I am against guns. They will not ask me to leave the country and consider me not a citizen. That's crazy. That's being a lunatic. it is more than just voicing your opinion strongly when you have no fact but do only insults. Therefore, I am 100% stand that people like standforamerica are bunch of lunatics who get easily anger and should never own a gun.
yes4me 2 years ago
Well see that is your opinion, I dont happen to agree but lets move on, what measures do you support? And if you feel comfortable with stating (you don't have to if you don't want to) whether you would be of a conservative or liberal viewpoint?
chaostheoryfilms 2 years ago
I don't have many rules actually regarding guns regulation but there is one I was thinking for a while and I think it makes sense: limit the number of guns anyone can own to 100. It is a made up number of course, but I think if you have 100 guns, it should be enough to defend yourself and hunt. If you are buying more, it is probably for selling them (ex: Mexico) or for gang purpose...
yes4me 2 years ago
There are a lot of collectors out there. And I must clear up th number of weapons going to Mexico, BATFE traces for less than 10% originated from the US, and that include the Colt M-16's that the US government sells them, most of the weapons can (if the Mexican government would co-operate which they dont) probably be traced back to their military or other outside sources (Norinco AK-47's).
chaostheoryfilms 2 years ago
see... it is exactly the opposite. rcman123 and
standforamerica have just prove my point over and over. If I disagree with them, they don't want me in "their" country like their own it or something. total BS.
yes4me 2 years ago
One of things that is great about this country people have the freedom to voice their opinions, 1st amendment right, and the 2nd makes sure the government cant go crazy on the first.
chaostheoryfilms 2 years ago
i dont care lol no one will ever stop me from carry a gun
38006 2 years ago
WTF is this law supposed to stop besides people with permits from defending themselves? Criminals don't give a shit about these silly laws. Hell, they'll smuggle anything they want cross-state, and cross-borders. Ask Mexico, drowning in "made in the USA" weapons
truepaths 2 years ago
I agree, except that USA weapons going to Mexico is propaganda from the Left. The like automatic weapons down there and they aren't getting them from here. They can get them from the boat load elsewhere.
oilhammer04 2 years ago 2
The measure is so irrelevant anyway. The states can't make laws infringing the 2nd Amendment right of all citizens. I try to avoid the infringer states when I travel. These states set up peaceful travelers to be victims when they restrict our right to travel armed.
oilhammer04 2 years ago
The ability to own a firearm privately must be recognized and respected by all states.
katey1dog 2 years ago 12
Interesting debate. States' rights clearly favor rejection of the amendment, but with the 2nd and 14th Amendments to the Constitution, do the states really have the right to restrict concealed weapons anyway? For real constitutional purists, this has to be the right decision because the founders would have left it entirely to the states seeing no role whatsoever for the Federal government.
HopSingSex 2 years ago
I like the idea of an armed citizenry...The criminals aren't concerning themselves with following laws, only the gun owners are.
wideawake123 2 years ago 12
None of this will stop people from taking concealed weapons with them over state lines if they want to. Our country could use a little anarchy.
ipodkiller6 2 years ago 4
The Second Amendment recognizes the right of citizens to be armed. How does it lead to anarchy for armed citizens to cross state lines?
oilhammer04 2 years ago
DID YOU READ WHAT I SAID? I said that it's good that the senate doesn't want people taking concealed weapons across state lines, because that means the government isn't in control of us. People are going to keep doing whatever they want.
ipodkiller6 2 years ago
Yes and what you now say sounds like the opposite. No offense intended.
oilhammer04 2 years ago
The opposite? I want complete chaos. Only once the government is at our knees, we can improve it. I'm tired of all this Washington lobbying and politics before people. It gets us NOWHERE.
ipodkiller6 2 years ago
Ipodkiller6, revolutions generally swap one bunch of thugs for a new set, because revolutions don't change the nature of man. America had the blessing of having some pretty wise and upright Founding Fathers. That is very unusual.
oilhammer04 2 years ago
And if the founding fathers knew that our country was governed by religion, lobbyists, and straight-out cowards, then they would hate America.
ipodkiller6 2 years ago
Then we need to change the nature of man itself.
rcman123 2 years ago
Yes . . . . new birth into God's family through Christ.
oilhammer04 2 years ago