The wing is still there .... it's just blending in with the sky because the plane angled so the rest of it was shadow but the wing was catching the sun light
So many people will jump on any video artifact to "prove" something crazy. just look at all thoses reptilians YT videos to laught at how people are so easily fooled by any kind of glitch resulting from bad quality video, compression/conversion glitch, etc. The only thing theses people are proving is they have absolutely no knowledge of how digital video react to manipulations.
if this was the ONLY footage of the incident then you might have a point. but the fact that the same event was captured lots of times from various angles and camcorders means that you really don't have a valid point at all.....fucking moron!!!
@littledooo I demonstrated that the wing in this clip is not missing. Sorry if I upset your fantasy, genius, but if uncovering the truth makes me a moron, then you must live in one pathetic reality.
Name calling is pretty neat, but what would be even neater would be for you to prove me wrong.
Ok...clip begins. Here's a solid darkened silohuette of a plane flying on and uninterrupted path in OPEN SKIES. Continues on this path toward the tallest structure on the skyline. No banking. No turning. Darkened silohuette approaches building then miraculously for reasons that defy physics ONE WING BECOMES ILLUMINATED. It was previously in OPEN SKIES fully exposed to morning sunlight yet appears BLACK until it reaches the building whose shadow causes one wing to LIGHT UP? Thats amazing. LIE.
@JulietsMan Open skies? No. The sky was filled with thick smoke from the north tower. Did you read the description? No banking? Really? Have you watched any other videos of the plane? The plane was banked at impact. Read the description.
@saultrain Theres no logical reason for that wing to suddenly illuminate while the rest of the plane remains dark. I am not saying how it happened Im just asking the question which probably makes me unpatriotic and stupid right? Save it. I know Im useless and gay and a liberal obama lover ready to take hot dick in the ass and drink jizz. LIBSLIBSLIBSLIBSLIBSLIBSLIBSLIBSLIBSLIBSLIBSLIBSLIBSLIBSLIBSLIBSLIBSLIBSLIBSLIBSLIBS...never mind i SUCK!!!!
@JulietsMan WTF? I'm not sure why it's so har4d to understand. The smoke is casting a shadow. The plane is moving. The plane moves into the shadow, and because of the angle of the sun, by the time it reaches the building, the right wing exits the shadow. Plane moves in and then partially moves out. Watch it happen here:
watch?v=JzRljtPjOhM
Look at the plane here with one wing in the sun, one in the shadow:
@LichLordOfFlames Are you stupid? World war 2 was caused by Hitlers plan for world domination and by threatening Austria with war. When Austria failed to appease, Germany and Austria went into battle, bringing in all countries allied to either country.
@shimonrox I think you'll find that Hitler's invasion of Poland was when the war in Europe (essentially WWII) started, with Britain and French declaring war on Germany on the 3rd September 1939....
@mrfquick im no history major haha but i know for sure that lichlordofflames is an idiot... hitler did betray the russians but much later into the war
@joecanukk Seems like you've stopped taking your meds. Does your mom know about this? Be careful. She'll be pissed. She might try to kick you out of her basement.
@Gtslmfa0 Conspiracy is not just the plane being fake ... Its about how our goverment did 9/11 too us becuz they needed a excuse to get back at afgan ...
good video sir! And dear conspiracy theorists, shut the fuck up why the hell would the government have ANY reason to attack its own country. you might say it was a reason to attack Iran, Iraq and afghan but Osama already claimed to do it AND the USA doesn't need a fucking terrorist attack to declare war on a country! so go back to your mom's basement and don't come out.
@shimonrox man u ever heared about how hitler started ww2?
he forced some of his own soldiers to wear russian uniforms and attack german grounds, especially some military bases. so it looked like some sort of russian spec ops infiltrated the bases and atacked them. so he had something big to counterstrike it with a war.
ok...so the wing is there, good job! i still wonder how it is possible for the nose to come out "unharmed" on the other side
also, maybe my eyes are wrong right now, but could it be that the "missing wing"´s angle does look quite odd, like the wing´s been pushed backward and cracked where the engine is
@Hunne2303 It's not the nose. It's the first part of the dense debris cloud blowing out of the opposite side. It looks p\sort of pointy from the side, but is actually much wider when seen from below.
The color difference on the wing makes the angle look pronounced, especially since part of that right engine is in the light also, but if you compare it to the angle of the wing before it turns color, the angle is the same.
@Hunne2303 Watch any other angle. It's a cloud coming out. The "nose" expands as it comes out. I don't know of any high quality slow mo clips, but here are a couple different angles.
@saultrain Or, maybe it's because this version of the video is fake and you edited it to make it appear that there is wing. There is that possibility.
@saultrain Computer Generated Imagery makes it possible to add a wing into the video. The angle of the wing doesn't look right at all. I also don't think sunlight can cause the dark blue tale fin to disappear in the other video. .
@EyeThirdThe The wing’s angle stays pretty much the same the whole time. The blue vertical tail fin is obscured from view on the opposite side. The horizontal fins are gray underneath.
So it makes more sense to you that the wing actually disappears than it does that compression artifacts obscured it?
@saultrain "The wing's angle stays pretty much the same the whole time."
-By saying,"stays PRETTY MUCH the same the hole time" you're admitting that it doesn't stay the same.
-The blue vertical fin is never obscured from view. That's why you can see it before it disappears in the original video.
-It's not that it "makes more sense" to me. It's that the angle of the wing doesn't look right at all. If the angle of the wing stayed consistent it would make sense. But, it doesn't.
@saultrain Plus, the bottom of the aircraft stays the same consistent color the entire time. The lighting doesn't change at all on the bottom part of aircraft. So, I don't see how sunlight can be the cause for changing the color of the bottom part of the wing. If it was the bottom part of the aircraft would shows signs of color change, as well.
@EyeThirdThe I said "pretty much" because the plane is banking. It would be inaccurate to say it stays the same, even though visually there's no discernible change.
You can't see the vertical blue stabilizer because the plane is banked port side. The "fin" you see is the starboard side horizontal stabilizer.
That the angle doesn't "LOOK" right to you is meaningless. If you can provide evidence that I faked the vid, please present some. OR give a better theory for the wing.
@EyeThirdThe BTW, I provided a link in the description to an original uncompressed copy of the clip. You can download it yourself. You'll find exactly what I have presented here, except in even higher quality, i.e., no flash compression. You should try doing some research and educating yourself before you accuse people of fraud.
@saultrain How do you know that the site for where you got the video from hasn't tampered with the original copy to show a wing? 911 datasets could just be a tampering with the footage before guys like you come across it. Adding a wing in wouldn't be that hard to do.
@EyeThirdThe Well, if your going to go down that road, then you can never prove, disprove, or conclude anything. How do you know ANY clip you're seeing hasn't been altered? But the clip comes from the International Center for 911 Studies NIST FOIA Release 14. The organization has a good rep and was behind the FOIA petition. The clip is in original full resolution, uncompressed, and interlaced format. What reason is there to believe it might have been altered?
@Hunne2303 You cant get through , the fluoride and toxins from sucking on US flags made in China have dulled the critical thinking centers of the brain ...Some of the mainstream mindwipes cannot be saved.
@philquinton i don't know with the overwhelming evidence we all saw on that day where defnitely real enough..as a consequence these buildings should have just been severely damaged from the impact zones ..unimaginable bad luck and a sequence events somehow both buildings be consumed by thier own foundations. Which i didn't expect to happen or anybody at the time...not to fall in this nature...so i'm 60%/40% Against the conspiracy theorists..
I noticed that the planes nose is still intact how can that be if its made of fibreglass or something like it ?
chlyon 7 hours ago
The wing is still there .... it's just blending in with the sky because the plane angled so the rest of it was shadow but the wing was catching the sun light
Either that or this is fake ....
SchiffThomas 2 days ago
9/11 its a conspiracy
augustoPOGOARES 5 days ago
@augustoPOGOARES How is that statement related to this video?
saultrain 5 days ago
@littledooo That's what I thought, mate. It's easy to blow smoke out your ass, but then you have to run when it gets challenged.
saultrain 6 days ago
So many people will jump on any video artifact to "prove" something crazy. just look at all thoses reptilians YT videos to laught at how people are so easily fooled by any kind of glitch resulting from bad quality video, compression/conversion glitch, etc. The only thing theses people are proving is they have absolutely no knowledge of how digital video react to manipulations.
skyfighta 6 days ago
if this was the ONLY footage of the incident then you might have a point. but the fact that the same event was captured lots of times from various angles and camcorders means that you really don't have a valid point at all.....fucking moron!!!
littledooo 1 week ago
@littledooo I demonstrated that the wing in this clip is not missing. Sorry if I upset your fantasy, genius, but if uncovering the truth makes me a moron, then you must live in one pathetic reality.
Name calling is pretty neat, but what would be even neater would be for you to prove me wrong.
saultrain 1 week ago
@saultrain i couldn't give a fuck mate....
littledooo 6 days ago
Ok...clip begins. Here's a solid darkened silohuette of a plane flying on and uninterrupted path in OPEN SKIES. Continues on this path toward the tallest structure on the skyline. No banking. No turning. Darkened silohuette approaches building then miraculously for reasons that defy physics ONE WING BECOMES ILLUMINATED. It was previously in OPEN SKIES fully exposed to morning sunlight yet appears BLACK until it reaches the building whose shadow causes one wing to LIGHT UP? Thats amazing. LIE.
JulietsMan 1 week ago
@JulietsMan Open skies? No. The sky was filled with thick smoke from the north tower. Did you read the description? No banking? Really? Have you watched any other videos of the plane? The plane was banked at impact. Read the description.
saultrain 1 week ago
@saultrain Theres no logical reason for that wing to suddenly illuminate while the rest of the plane remains dark. I am not saying how it happened Im just asking the question which probably makes me unpatriotic and stupid right? Save it. I know Im useless and gay and a liberal obama lover ready to take hot dick in the ass and drink jizz. LIBSLIBSLIBSLIBSLIBSLIBSLIBSLIBSLIBSLIBSLIBSLIBSLIBSLIBSLIBSLIBSLIBSLIBSLIBSLIBSLIBS...never mind i SUCK!!!!
JulietsMan 1 week ago
@JulietsMan WTF? I'm not sure why it's so har4d to understand. The smoke is casting a shadow. The plane is moving. The plane moves into the shadow, and because of the angle of the sun, by the time it reaches the building, the right wing exits the shadow. Plane moves in and then partially moves out. Watch it happen here:
watch?v=JzRljtPjOhM
Look at the plane here with one wing in the sun, one in the shadow:
watch?v=u-9VFIW7Aac
saultrain 1 week ago
@JulietsMan LOL being Canadian allows me to question this kind of stuff without my comrades shunning me and calling me an insensitive asshole! :D
killerdude151 1 week ago
@JulietsMan
watch?v=vI3ZpLuz3ts
LittleSaints01 4 days ago
@LichLordOfFlames Are you stupid? World war 2 was caused by Hitlers plan for world domination and by threatening Austria with war. When Austria failed to appease, Germany and Austria went into battle, bringing in all countries allied to either country.
shimonrox 3 weeks ago
@shimonrox I think you'll find that Hitler's invasion of Poland was when the war in Europe (essentially WWII) started, with Britain and French declaring war on Germany on the 3rd September 1939....
mrfquick 3 weeks ago
@mrfquick im no history major haha but i know for sure that lichlordofflames is an idiot... hitler did betray the russians but much later into the war
shimonrox 2 weeks ago
@saultrain then why name the video9/11 Disappearing Wing of Hologram CGI Plane
MrTlove99 3 weeks ago
@MrTlove99 Look up DEBUNK in the dictionary. It should start to make sense to you. Peace.
saultrain 3 weeks ago
@saultrain if you look close you can see the white wing coming out of the black shadow
MrTlove99 3 weeks ago
@MrTlove99 Did you read the description?
saultrain 3 weeks ago
if you pay attention to your own flipping video you would see that if you look close you can see the wing of the plane gosh
MrTlove99 3 weeks ago
@MrTlove99 Wait . . . what?
saultrain 3 weeks ago
BTW, RIP every single person who died on 9/11 <3
LolMatey 3 weeks ago
The sun is beaming on this WHITE jet ... WTF?
joecanukk 3 weeks ago
@joecanukk Who said the jet was white?
saultrain 3 weeks ago
@saultrain Sorry blue and light grey on a perfect sunny day . but hey black jets are the new white.
joecanukk 3 weeks ago
@joecanukk Seems like you've stopped taking your meds. Does your mom know about this? Be careful. She'll be pissed. She might try to kick you out of her basement.
saultrain 3 weeks ago
conspiracy people make me laugh. good video
Gtslmfa0 3 weeks ago
@Gtslmfa0 Conspiracy is not just the plane being fake ... Its about how our goverment did 9/11 too us becuz they needed a excuse to get back at afgan ...
wehomy 3 weeks ago
@wehomy if they wanted to, they could've just gone over
Gtslmfa0 3 weeks ago
good video sir! And dear conspiracy theorists, shut the fuck up why the hell would the government have ANY reason to attack its own country. you might say it was a reason to attack Iran, Iraq and afghan but Osama already claimed to do it AND the USA doesn't need a fucking terrorist attack to declare war on a country! so go back to your mom's basement and don't come out.
shimonrox 3 weeks ago
@shimonrox Money
joecanukk 3 weeks ago
@shimonrox man u ever heared about how hitler started ww2?
he forced some of his own soldiers to wear russian uniforms and attack german grounds, especially some military bases. so it looked like some sort of russian spec ops infiltrated the bases and atacked them. so he had something big to counterstrike it with a war.
so he did and declared war.
why shouldn't usa do the same way?
just sayin' so pls don't flame it
LichLordOfFlames 3 weeks ago
ok...so the wing is there, good job! i still wonder how it is possible for the nose to come out "unharmed" on the other side
also, maybe my eyes are wrong right now, but could it be that the "missing wing"´s angle does look quite odd, like the wing´s been pushed backward and cracked where the engine is
Hunne2303 4 weeks ago
@Hunne2303 It's not the nose. It's the first part of the dense debris cloud blowing out of the opposite side. It looks p\sort of pointy from the side, but is actually much wider when seen from below.
The color difference on the wing makes the angle look pronounced, especially since part of that right engine is in the light also, but if you compare it to the angle of the wing before it turns color, the angle is the same.
saultrain 4 weeks ago
@saultrain
got a link for a "from below" shot? somehow i don´t buy it being debris unless i see said video,
as for the wing, ok, just was wondering about it
Hunne2303 2 weeks ago
@Hunne2303 Watch any other angle. It's a cloud coming out. The "nose" expands as it comes out. I don't know of any high quality slow mo clips, but here are a couple different angles.
watch?v=dUyV3Ue1rMY
watch?v=_HnuH93FJJ8
saultrain 2 weeks ago
@saultrain Or, maybe it's because this version of the video is fake and you edited it to make it appear that there is wing. There is that possibility.
EyeThirdThe 2 weeks ago
@EyeThirdThe How is there a possibility? What evidence is there that I faked the video?
saultrain 2 weeks ago
@saultrain Computer Generated Imagery makes it possible to add a wing into the video. The angle of the wing doesn't look right at all. I also don't think sunlight can cause the dark blue tale fin to disappear in the other video. .
EyeThirdThe 2 weeks ago
@EyeThirdThe The wing’s angle stays pretty much the same the whole time. The blue vertical tail fin is obscured from view on the opposite side. The horizontal fins are gray underneath.
So it makes more sense to you that the wing actually disappears than it does that compression artifacts obscured it?
I challenge you to prove that.
saultrain 2 weeks ago
@saultrain "The wing's angle stays pretty much the same the whole time."
-By saying,"stays PRETTY MUCH the same the hole time" you're admitting that it doesn't stay the same.
-The blue vertical fin is never obscured from view. That's why you can see it before it disappears in the original video.
-It's not that it "makes more sense" to me. It's that the angle of the wing doesn't look right at all. If the angle of the wing stayed consistent it would make sense. But, it doesn't.
EyeThirdThe 2 weeks ago
@saultrain Plus, the bottom of the aircraft stays the same consistent color the entire time. The lighting doesn't change at all on the bottom part of aircraft. So, I don't see how sunlight can be the cause for changing the color of the bottom part of the wing. If it was the bottom part of the aircraft would shows signs of color change, as well.
EyeThirdThe 2 weeks ago
@EyeThirdThe I said "pretty much" because the plane is banking. It would be inaccurate to say it stays the same, even though visually there's no discernible change.
You can't see the vertical blue stabilizer because the plane is banked port side. The "fin" you see is the starboard side horizontal stabilizer.
That the angle doesn't "LOOK" right to you is meaningless. If you can provide evidence that I faked the vid, please present some. OR give a better theory for the wing.
saultrain 2 weeks ago
@EyeThirdThe BTW, I provided a link in the description to an original uncompressed copy of the clip. You can download it yourself. You'll find exactly what I have presented here, except in even higher quality, i.e., no flash compression. You should try doing some research and educating yourself before you accuse people of fraud.
saultrain 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
EyeThirdThe 1 week ago
@saultrain How do you know that the site for where you got the video from hasn't tampered with the original copy to show a wing? 911 datasets could just be a tampering with the footage before guys like you come across it. Adding a wing in wouldn't be that hard to do.
EyeThirdThe 1 week ago
@EyeThirdThe Well, if your going to go down that road, then you can never prove, disprove, or conclude anything. How do you know ANY clip you're seeing hasn't been altered? But the clip comes from the International Center for 911 Studies NIST FOIA Release 14. The organization has a good rep and was behind the FOIA petition. The clip is in original full resolution, uncompressed, and interlaced format. What reason is there to believe it might have been altered?
saultrain 1 week ago
@Hunne2303 You cant get through , the fluoride and toxins from sucking on US flags made in China have dulled the critical thinking centers of the brain ...Some of the mainstream mindwipes cannot be saved.
joecanukk 3 weeks ago
I'm sorry, I apologize, I didn't read the description.
DaleTuck31 1 month ago
@saultrain Who likes to read? honestly.
DaleTuck31 1 month ago
its photoshoped or its the angle/lighting look closer you can still see the out line of the planes wing....
MitchsTechHelp 1 month ago
@MitchsTechHelp I guess people just don't like to read.
saultrain 1 month ago
good vid
philquinton 1 month ago
@philquinton You must be a conspiracy theorist. -.-
DaleTuck31 1 month ago
@philquinton i don't know with the overwhelming evidence we all saw on that day where defnitely real enough..as a consequence these buildings should have just been severely damaged from the impact zones ..unimaginable bad luck and a sequence events somehow both buildings be consumed by thier own foundations. Which i didn't expect to happen or anybody at the time...not to fall in this nature...so i'm 60%/40% Against the conspiracy theorists..
philquinton 1 month ago