Added: 3 years ago
From: bravenewfilms
Views: 3,470
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (38)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Climate change is "real" but we used to call it weather - and people have nothing to do with it. Global warming hysteria is a political campaign to squeeze more tax dollars from the oil companies.

  • no the oil companies want to pretend its not real so they can keep making more money i mean even if we keep up with the drilling the oil gose to exxon and that gose out of the country and to many different countries so it dosent even matter and the gas prices wont go down that way only get higher

  • Haha, blow baby blow!

  • Yeah, but knocking down mountains to get at the coal and pushing the debris into rivers ain't cool regardless of what burning coal does to the air. Besides, sustainable energy works forever and will create jobs. What's wrong with that?

  • Sustainable energy (wind/solar) doesn't work forever. It works when conditions are right. Because of that, sustainable energy devices need conventional electricity supply stations in operation ALL THE TIME in 'spinning standby'. That is redundant, wasted, conventionally created energy. They're a net negative impact on the environment any way you slice it. Nuclear power is the only source with zero emissions. It is the safest source ever.

  • "Nuclear power is the only source with zero emissions. It is the safest source ever."

    Just checking, but that's a joke, right? Well, if not, it's still hilarious. Nuclear fission creates waste that will never go away and we still have no safe place to store it. Plus, there is always the possibility of a meltdown. In my view, if we can go to the moon or make the A-bomb, we can figure out a safe, sustainable, and reliable source of energy with the right leadership. What about nuclear fusion

  • Waste and emissions are not the same. As I said before - Nuclear power is the only source with ZERO emissions. It is the safest source for energy even factoring its extremely rare occurences of mishap. Would you rather keep leveling mountains or store material deep under the earth? Either way - wind and solar is not your salvation. Wherever these sources are found there is redundant conventional power sources...running all day every day - it is entirely unavoidable.

  • Your wrong. Climate change is a scientific fact, it's accelerating, it's already doing significant harm, and human activities are mostly responsible for it. Climate change has been vetted and documented in excruciating detail by the largest, longest, costliest, most international, most interdisciplinary, and most thorough formal review of a scientific topic ever conducted. Read the IPCC, or thousands of scientific studies.

  • Oh, I've read the IPCC. The Mann Study that is foundational to the IPCC has been categorically, under peer review, been proven as a fraud. Many of the signers have now gone on to sue the IPCC. 30K scientists in fields related to climatology (including 10K PHD's) have signed the petition started by the former pres of the NAS to expose this hoax. 30K! Now the IPCC builds its false case around consensus (which is not science) - and 30K professionals says bullshit.

  • Germany has bought ALL SOLAR from everyone in ASIA & they cant keep up with DEAMND ! They run 24/7 and still cant keep up .Germany has made EVERYTHING SOLAR ! Americans are really stupid .People could becoming Millionares Over Night ...and Home-owners would be getting checks from the Electric companies instead of giving them their money ! America is YEARS BEHIND THE REST OF THE WORLD ...even Health Care 100,000 people WILL DIE in America this yr with No Health Care

  • it takes about ten years to make a nuclear power plant, so wind and solar, and waves should be the obvious next step

  • Wow if he will do anything to get elected, why is he running as an libertarian?

    gg

  • Man, this gal know her stuff!

  • Cocoon 08

  • All this talk of renewable energy is pretty much pointless. We should have just jumped on board with Europe and start building a Nuclear Fusion plant. Nuclear Fusion is the technology that will really be the answer.

  • Yes for the short term, drilling will take far too long. We need to fire up those nuke plants and begin to develop and put forth effort into renewable energy, not drilling. Nuke is by far the most efficient and easily executed, but it is far too dangerous to run our country on for years to come. Chernobyl ring any bells? There must be something done in the short term and nuclear plants ARE the answer! It will give us time to set up the infrastructure necessary to make renewable energy possible.

  • You're thinking of Nuclear Fission. Nuclear Fission is totally different, dangerous, and wasteful. Nuclear Fusion is completely different and far cleaner. In France they're starting construction of the first ever Nuclear Fusion plant. Go Google it, it's really interesting.

  • The byproduct may be cleaner, but the waste of any nuclear reaction is dangerous to the environment. Fusion is still experimental, at any rate nuclear power should not be the end all be all. Their are efficient energy resources that are basically untapped and should be used to allow us to have energy dependence.

  • independence*

  • It doesn't produce waste though. Show me where Nuclear Fusion creates waste. It produces usable molecules... Nuclear Fission creates waste. Nuclear Fusion can easily be the end all be all of energy. It's clean, safe, and super efficient. Yes, it's still experimental but, it's underway in France. It's expected to be completed in 16 years.

  • You can't call yourself a Libertarian if you voted for DOMA

  • Adolf Hitler 08.

  • These Bravenewfilms are great! thanks for the great information that a lot of the big corporate news companies don't like to cover!!

  • Military Dictatorship '08!

  • um... electric car?

  • No no NOOOO! You fools! Not WIND, but AIR can be used for cars! Check out my favorites.

  • Bob Barr 08

  • Jesus no.

  • wtf, bob barr? never even heard of him, why are nader and that fool running? theyre just taking votes away form the candidates that ACTUALLY matter.

  • Haha, yeh screw democracy! Lets just only vote for who the media tells us 'matters'!

  • um...its not because of what the media says, im saying that bob barr knows hes not going to win, and hes just drawing votes from the two candidates that would win, obama and mccain. i dont need the media to tell me that. im sure that if nader hadnt run in 2000, gore would have won; because of those votes that got wasted, gore would have had a more significant lead and it would have been impossible to steal the election.

  • because there are no differences between mccain and obama both want bigger government

  • thats a complete lie, i have no idea where you heard that.

  • There is freedom to vote like you want in this country and Bob Barr is a constitutional man just like Ron Paul who recommends him.And why should you vote for someone you do not want to vote for... Stupid

  • they only recommend eachother caz they want to destroy the world ron paul wants to get rid of the fda and the epa and bob barr and him both want to get rid of birth control and make it illigal wtf is wrong with people like u

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more