Climate change is "real" but we used to call it weather - and people have nothing to do with it. Global warming hysteria is a political campaign to squeeze more tax dollars from the oil companies.
no the oil companies want to pretend its not real so they can keep making more money i mean even if we keep up with the drilling the oil gose to exxon and that gose out of the country and to many different countries so it dosent even matter and the gas prices wont go down that way only get higher
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Good grief. I thought BNF was beyond all this bullshit. The 'climate change' (cuz global warming and global cooling just didn't make the cut) farce is so played. .025% of the world's atmospheric content and you'd think the live-giving gas of the planet was the breath of Satan. Read people. Read the club of Rome docs, read Haas' book - they themselves admit its a farce. The brainchild of the very ones who have you by the balls when you pay $4/gal for gas.
Yeah, but knocking down mountains to get at the coal and pushing the debris into rivers ain't cool regardless of what burning coal does to the air. Besides, sustainable energy works forever and will create jobs. What's wrong with that?
Sustainable energy (wind/solar) doesn't work forever. It works when conditions are right. Because of that, sustainable energy devices need conventional electricity supply stations in operation ALL THE TIME in 'spinning standby'. That is redundant, wasted, conventionally created energy. They're a net negative impact on the environment any way you slice it. Nuclear power is the only source with zero emissions. It is the safest source ever.
"Nuclear power is the only source with zero emissions. It is the safest source ever."
Just checking, but that's a joke, right? Well, if not, it's still hilarious. Nuclear fission creates waste that will never go away and we still have no safe place to store it. Plus, there is always the possibility of a meltdown. In my view, if we can go to the moon or make the A-bomb, we can figure out a safe, sustainable, and reliable source of energy with the right leadership. What about nuclear fusion
Waste and emissions are not the same. As I said before - Nuclear power is the only source with ZERO emissions. It is the safest source for energy even factoring its extremely rare occurences of mishap. Would you rather keep leveling mountains or store material deep under the earth? Either way - wind and solar is not your salvation. Wherever these sources are found there is redundant conventional power sources...running all day every day - it is entirely unavoidable.
Your wrong. Climate change is a scientific fact, it's accelerating, it's already doing significant harm, and human activities are mostly responsible for it. Climate change has been vetted and documented in excruciating detail by the largest, longest, costliest, most international, most interdisciplinary, and most thorough formal review of a scientific topic ever conducted. Read the IPCC, or thousands of scientific studies.
Oh, I've read the IPCC. The Mann Study that is foundational to the IPCC has been categorically, under peer review, been proven as a fraud. Many of the signers have now gone on to sue the IPCC. 30K scientists in fields related to climatology (including 10K PHD's) have signed the petition started by the former pres of the NAS to expose this hoax. 30K! Now the IPCC builds its false case around consensus (which is not science) - and 30K professionals says bullshit.
Germany has bought ALL SOLAR from everyone in ASIA & they cant keep up with DEAMND ! They run 24/7 and still cant keep up .Germany has made EVERYTHING SOLAR ! Americans are really stupid .People could becoming Millionares Over Night ...and Home-owners would be getting checks from the Electric companies instead of giving them their money ! America is YEARS BEHIND THE REST OF THE WORLD ...even Health Care 100,000 people WILL DIE in America this yr with No Health Care
All this talk of renewable energy is pretty much pointless. We should have just jumped on board with Europe and start building a Nuclear Fusion plant. Nuclear Fusion is the technology that will really be the answer.
Yes for the short term, drilling will take far too long. We need to fire up those nuke plants and begin to develop and put forth effort into renewable energy, not drilling. Nuke is by far the most efficient and easily executed, but it is far too dangerous to run our country on for years to come. Chernobyl ring any bells? There must be something done in the short term and nuclear plants ARE the answer! It will give us time to set up the infrastructure necessary to make renewable energy possible.
You're thinking of Nuclear Fission. Nuclear Fission is totally different, dangerous, and wasteful. Nuclear Fusion is completely different and far cleaner. In France they're starting construction of the first ever Nuclear Fusion plant. Go Google it, it's really interesting.
The byproduct may be cleaner, but the waste of any nuclear reaction is dangerous to the environment. Fusion is still experimental, at any rate nuclear power should not be the end all be all. Their are efficient energy resources that are basically untapped and should be used to allow us to have energy dependence.
It doesn't produce waste though. Show me where Nuclear Fusion creates waste. It produces usable molecules... Nuclear Fission creates waste. Nuclear Fusion can easily be the end all be all of energy. It's clean, safe, and super efficient. Yes, it's still experimental but, it's underway in France. It's expected to be completed in 16 years.
um...its not because of what the media says, im saying that bob barr knows hes not going to win, and hes just drawing votes from the two candidates that would win, obama and mccain. i dont need the media to tell me that. im sure that if nader hadnt run in 2000, gore would have won; because of those votes that got wasted, gore would have had a more significant lead and it would have been impossible to steal the election.
There is freedom to vote like you want in this country and Bob Barr is a constitutional man just like Ron Paul who recommends him.And why should you vote for someone you do not want to vote for... Stupid
they only recommend eachother caz they want to destroy the world ron paul wants to get rid of the fda and the epa and bob barr and him both want to get rid of birth control and make it illigal wtf is wrong with people like u
Climate change is "real" but we used to call it weather - and people have nothing to do with it. Global warming hysteria is a political campaign to squeeze more tax dollars from the oil companies.
AcePilot101 3 years ago
no the oil companies want to pretend its not real so they can keep making more money i mean even if we keep up with the drilling the oil gose to exxon and that gose out of the country and to many different countries so it dosent even matter and the gas prices wont go down that way only get higher
kazooga1234 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
*JOHN MCCAIN = A HYPOCRITE*
McCain was the KEY NOTE SPEAKER at an ACORN Convention just two years ago!
Phil Gramm, John McCain's Top Economic Advisor, was named last night as one of the TOP TEN CULPRITS IN THE ECONOMIC COLLAPSE !!!
Phil Gramm was described as "The PILAR of the COLLAPSE"! McCain's Economic Advisor is one of the main reasons the American Economy has crashed!
Phil Gramm - McCain's Advisor - The person who said America "Is a Nation of WHINERS"!
F$#% McBush!
blueguise23 3 years ago
Haha, blow baby blow!
LimeInTheCoconut21 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Good grief. I thought BNF was beyond all this bullshit. The 'climate change' (cuz global warming and global cooling just didn't make the cut) farce is so played. .025% of the world's atmospheric content and you'd think the live-giving gas of the planet was the breath of Satan. Read people. Read the club of Rome docs, read Haas' book - they themselves admit its a farce. The brainchild of the very ones who have you by the balls when you pay $4/gal for gas.
ayebretwalda 3 years ago
Yeah, but knocking down mountains to get at the coal and pushing the debris into rivers ain't cool regardless of what burning coal does to the air. Besides, sustainable energy works forever and will create jobs. What's wrong with that?
Umberto2 3 years ago
Sustainable energy (wind/solar) doesn't work forever. It works when conditions are right. Because of that, sustainable energy devices need conventional electricity supply stations in operation ALL THE TIME in 'spinning standby'. That is redundant, wasted, conventionally created energy. They're a net negative impact on the environment any way you slice it. Nuclear power is the only source with zero emissions. It is the safest source ever.
ayebretwalda 3 years ago
"Nuclear power is the only source with zero emissions. It is the safest source ever."
Just checking, but that's a joke, right? Well, if not, it's still hilarious. Nuclear fission creates waste that will never go away and we still have no safe place to store it. Plus, there is always the possibility of a meltdown. In my view, if we can go to the moon or make the A-bomb, we can figure out a safe, sustainable, and reliable source of energy with the right leadership. What about nuclear fusion
Umberto2 3 years ago
Waste and emissions are not the same. As I said before - Nuclear power is the only source with ZERO emissions. It is the safest source for energy even factoring its extremely rare occurences of mishap. Would you rather keep leveling mountains or store material deep under the earth? Either way - wind and solar is not your salvation. Wherever these sources are found there is redundant conventional power sources...running all day every day - it is entirely unavoidable.
ayebretwalda 3 years ago
Your wrong. Climate change is a scientific fact, it's accelerating, it's already doing significant harm, and human activities are mostly responsible for it. Climate change has been vetted and documented in excruciating detail by the largest, longest, costliest, most international, most interdisciplinary, and most thorough formal review of a scientific topic ever conducted. Read the IPCC, or thousands of scientific studies.
2becontinued 3 years ago 4
Oh, I've read the IPCC. The Mann Study that is foundational to the IPCC has been categorically, under peer review, been proven as a fraud. Many of the signers have now gone on to sue the IPCC. 30K scientists in fields related to climatology (including 10K PHD's) have signed the petition started by the former pres of the NAS to expose this hoax. 30K! Now the IPCC builds its false case around consensus (which is not science) - and 30K professionals says bullshit.
ayebretwalda 3 years ago
Germany has bought ALL SOLAR from everyone in ASIA & they cant keep up with DEAMND ! They run 24/7 and still cant keep up .Germany has made EVERYTHING SOLAR ! Americans are really stupid .People could becoming Millionares Over Night ...and Home-owners would be getting checks from the Electric companies instead of giving them their money ! America is YEARS BEHIND THE REST OF THE WORLD ...even Health Care 100,000 people WILL DIE in America this yr with No Health Care
nohealthcare62 3 years ago
it takes about ten years to make a nuclear power plant, so wind and solar, and waves should be the obvious next step
urasmore 3 years ago
Wow if he will do anything to get elected, why is he running as an libertarian?
gg
DMWestWoodElite 3 years ago
Man, this gal know her stuff!
newbreed1 3 years ago 2
Cocoon 08
newbreed1 3 years ago
All this talk of renewable energy is pretty much pointless. We should have just jumped on board with Europe and start building a Nuclear Fusion plant. Nuclear Fusion is the technology that will really be the answer.
JoeGoalie 3 years ago
Yes for the short term, drilling will take far too long. We need to fire up those nuke plants and begin to develop and put forth effort into renewable energy, not drilling. Nuke is by far the most efficient and easily executed, but it is far too dangerous to run our country on for years to come. Chernobyl ring any bells? There must be something done in the short term and nuclear plants ARE the answer! It will give us time to set up the infrastructure necessary to make renewable energy possible.
DezzyRaY 3 years ago
You're thinking of Nuclear Fission. Nuclear Fission is totally different, dangerous, and wasteful. Nuclear Fusion is completely different and far cleaner. In France they're starting construction of the first ever Nuclear Fusion plant. Go Google it, it's really interesting.
JoeGoalie 3 years ago
The byproduct may be cleaner, but the waste of any nuclear reaction is dangerous to the environment. Fusion is still experimental, at any rate nuclear power should not be the end all be all. Their are efficient energy resources that are basically untapped and should be used to allow us to have energy dependence.
DezzyRaY 3 years ago
independence*
DezzyRaY 3 years ago
It doesn't produce waste though. Show me where Nuclear Fusion creates waste. It produces usable molecules... Nuclear Fission creates waste. Nuclear Fusion can easily be the end all be all of energy. It's clean, safe, and super efficient. Yes, it's still experimental but, it's underway in France. It's expected to be completed in 16 years.
JoeGoalie 3 years ago 2
You can't call yourself a Libertarian if you voted for DOMA
V3125 3 years ago
Adolf Hitler 08.
daxyboyfuck 3 years ago
These Bravenewfilms are great! thanks for the great information that a lot of the big corporate news companies don't like to cover!!
firefox962 3 years ago
Military Dictatorship '08!
insultant 3 years ago
um... electric car?
Bsilk84 3 years ago 2
No no NOOOO! You fools! Not WIND, but AIR can be used for cars! Check out my favorites.
Marth48 3 years ago 2
Bob Barr 08
DMWestWoodElite 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Ralph Nader 08
Marth48 3 years ago
Jesus no.
AustralianStallion90 3 years ago 3
wtf, bob barr? never even heard of him, why are nader and that fool running? theyre just taking votes away form the candidates that ACTUALLY matter.
aviloud 3 years ago
Haha, yeh screw democracy! Lets just only vote for who the media tells us 'matters'!
imthunder 3 years ago
um...its not because of what the media says, im saying that bob barr knows hes not going to win, and hes just drawing votes from the two candidates that would win, obama and mccain. i dont need the media to tell me that. im sure that if nader hadnt run in 2000, gore would have won; because of those votes that got wasted, gore would have had a more significant lead and it would have been impossible to steal the election.
aviloud 3 years ago
because there are no differences between mccain and obama both want bigger government
kakahass 3 years ago
thats a complete lie, i have no idea where you heard that.
aviloud 3 years ago
There is freedom to vote like you want in this country and Bob Barr is a constitutional man just like Ron Paul who recommends him.And why should you vote for someone you do not want to vote for... Stupid
OneliaG 3 years ago
they only recommend eachother caz they want to destroy the world ron paul wants to get rid of the fda and the epa and bob barr and him both want to get rid of birth control and make it illigal wtf is wrong with people like u
kazooga1234 3 years ago