Structural-Functionalism, the social prospective documented and founded by Emile is the basis of conservative ideology. Basically, it is about the status quo. Knowing society as it is understanding how functions and structures in society work together. It counters the whole idea that change is necessary. However, if you make a stain and don't fix it, it'll just grow moldy and get worse. That is the problem with conservative-libertarianism. It doesn't address problems as they get worse.
Problem you have with your views UTubekookdetector is that a lot of it can be debunked with just pure knowledge of human beings. I don't disagree with you that Z is a fucking coward. I chatted with her and had her gay boyfriend stalk me. So I know how ghastly and annoying it is to deal with her. But I do disagree with you when it comes to the principles behind socialism and individualism. Simply this, humans are not pure individualistic and cannot survive on their own. This is a proven fact.
Thus we have to depend on each other as a group in order to survive. Humans don't have what it takes to survive on their own in an isolated world. This reality is what destroys the foundation behind conservative libertarianism. And yes, you would be correct with what you have said in how liberal-progressive ideology ends up making matters worse. However, at least they actual problems. They do tend to over-exaggerate, ignore, and become completely arrogant. But they do acknowledge actual problems
They just shouldn't be the problem solvers is what I am saying. They do make valid points once the exaggeration has been filtered about what needs to be changed. And does differ from you conservative-libertarians who tend to ignore problems in their entirety, even though your kind tends to not inflate already established system, which is a positive quality. The ones who know how to be great problem solvers are the intellectual geolibertarian communitarians like me.
We have keep the facts in check and not ignore them when we face the problems in our society.
Here are the facts:
1) Humans must depend on others in order to survive. We didn't evolve claws to defend ourselves from other animals. We had to invent and build up on prior knowledge to improve our technology and its utility. However, we don't possess the ability to acquire everything necessary to have that technology. Take a gun for instance, did you bought it or made it? Market = dependency.
Second fact: Humans are imperfect. This is proven in science, religion, literature, history, and ect... Thus everything we say holds an element of truth and an element of falsehood. And there is nothing we can individually do about it. It is part of the nature of an individual human mind. That we just cannot conceive of the entire knowledge of the universe and thus we have to invent knowledge to fill in the gaps of what we don't know or assume we know without full or prior knowledge.
This makes Liberals and Conservatives right and wrong at the same time.
You ultimately have to pick at the pieces between the two to find the truth and use non-faith based examinations to validate the true picture. This requires holding a consensus, an intellectual consensus to put together each of these pieces as a whole. This is why communitarians are the only problem solvers. It is based on facts. However, we are not that good at finding problems nor are we good at structural-functionalism.
SMART: "Humans don't have what it takes" I'm not here to discuss that, really. Nobody has a perfect solution, there will be winners & losers no matter what. Again, I'd limit Congress to Article I Section VIII and only those duties. It's the fact that they've strayed from that--there's the origin of many of our problems. Now, please only post comments specifically related to the vid topics, thanks.
SMART: Most of your comments really don't have anything to do with the video topic, just a lot of painting with a broad-brush (I did delete your comment about palestine-Israel as it is not germane). You may disagree with me on my views of socialism, but it's simply not enshrined in the Constitution, unless you want to limit it to Congress' powers granted in Aritcle I Section VIII. "address problems as they get worse" I would assume that you're assuming we've had a free market?
They do. But I am not specifying my self a simple conclusion of what I was drawing off from. From Miss Zitface, I was analyzing how liberals are stupid little fucktards that keep messing up our society and I was then conveying this to you in similarity to what is wrong with us all. Perhaps I was conveying too much at once, but the point is that Zitface is a human and as a human "she" is no different from the rest of us. Flawed, stupid, and completely absurd in every way.
They do. But I am not specifying my self a simple conclusion of what I was drawing off from. From Miss Zitface, I was analyzing how liberals are stupid little fucktards that keep messing up our society and I was then conveying this to you in similarity to what is wrong with us all. Perhaps I was conveying too much at once, but the point is that Zitface is a human and as a human "she" is no different from the rest of us. Flawed, stupid, and completely absurd in every way.
Oh we still have hundreds of years until we start seeing a strong peak in the declining of oil reservoirs. There is just that much life that had died. LOL! I mean we have had life roaming around for billions of years, thus he hold billions of years worth in fossil fuels and it is going to take more than a century or two to deplete all of that even if over ten billion humans regularly use fossil fuels. I can understand not using fossil fuels due to culture, but please don't those that do use it.
Sorry I was running low on text. Please don't attack those who do use fossil fuels. We can argue there should be regulations to make the output less disastrous to our overall economy. We can argue against oil pollution in our neighboring bodies of water, due to the impact on the fishing industry, which is very vital to Southern Economy. So we can find room for agreement and we can perhaps agree to make the regulations more economically sound. Make the regulations a profitable industry it self.
By that I am saying having regulations that do what they are suppose to do and not supersede that purpose. In addition, it might be more economically beneficial to have regulations that produce profit rather than harm industry. I am just throwing that out there.
This person also made the claim that Milton Friedman was not a good debater. I'll admit that is a very subjective topic but COME ON! If selling your ideas and opinions is the mark of a strong debate then Milton Friedman is perhaps the best debater of all time. He STILL inspires young people in this country!
@jakeyw11 If you think Friedman was a good debator go read Paul Diesing refute his Permenant Income theory. Friedman has been discredited ever since the BAM crisis of 82.
MSZ: Since it seems you're trolling my vid, waiting for someone to make a comment that is off-topic and then seizing upon that (funny how you're not discussing the topics in this vid with me) I'm going to tell you this ONE MORE TIME: If you want to debate Friedman or Israel or any other subject not covered in this vid w/another user you will take it to their channel. Capiche? Did that penetrate that tiny brain pan of yours? You will not be warned again moron, I've grown weary of your stalling.
Nice vid bro, Kudos for showing what a ignorant leftist this one is. I am constantly disgusted by her ludicrous "Israeli terrorists" or "Israeli War crimes" comments. That's how you can tell a true leftist, when they support a terrorist regime over Israel.
PAUL: I deeply appreciate it. Although I never really discussed Israel/foreign policy with her at length, I'd agree with what you said. She's one of YT's most prominent sophists. She told me she "was working" at took a one-month sabbatical from our discussion. However, during that time (I guess I did stalk her from afar for a while) she was busy posting nuggets on dozens of other channels.
@MsZeitgeist85 Oh yeah says who? You? Some dumbass Muslim extremist appeaser? So tell me besides you liberal cowards, what countries recognize Israel as a terrorist state? And the moron in chief you voted in wants Israel to give back land won in battle after being attacked unprovoked? Next he will be giving Texas to Mexico. Your kind seriously makes me gag.
PAUL: MSZ is definintely looking to segue out of my conversation with her on market speculation & peak oil. I think she's reached the end of her talking points bulletin.
@paulvick2002 1. The speech Obama gave on the 2 state solution is identical to the one that Bush gave in 2008. He said there must be a Palestinian State on the 67 borders with mutually agreed upon swaps. 2. Israel fired the first shot in the 67 war when they Pearl Harbored Egypt and Syria. Israel started the war. 3. Israel has ZERO legal claim to any of the West Bank, Gaza, and East Jerusalem. That is now my opinion that is the opinion of the World Court.
@MsZeitgeist85 Nice try moron trying to change the subject of your baseless claim that Israel is a terrorist state. Out of respect for Detectors wishes I will not explain to you how Egypt started the 6-day war before Israel's air strike and why their occupation is not illegal, on this video.
You will have to come to my page for that you ignorant piece of leftist trash.
MSZ: Now that Paul has offered you a debate on his channel pertaining to your off-topic comments Z, your next comment here will be a response to one or more (perhaps on market speculation) of the topics I discussed in this vid or you will be on your way. That's your last warning. PS, looking at some of the comments you've made, you have no room to call anyone stupid.
PIPER: I suggest you see the left side of my channel, all comments are supposed to be on topic. Israel's conflict with displaced Arabs isn't one of the topics. If you want to debate PAUL on that, go to his channel, I guarantee he will oblige you.
@UTubekookdetector msZ doesn't support Israel which has been mentioned here in comments. ostensibly, i was supporting paul's comment as i know his views and agree. thx
LOL MsZitGeyser is a douchebag who repeatedly did drive by's with no replies on my comment section. Ms.ZitGeyser needs to kill herself already. Before she becomes the next Loughner.
the pricing mechanism is more than capable of dealing with peak oil. if it is real, prices will go up and we will move away from oil. the big problem is that morons like msz keep pushing legislation which impedes that mechanism. they want higher oil prices, then they go after speculators for apparently creating those high prices. anyone who understands markets knows that the specs had very little to do with price spikes in 08
58R: Do you agree that gov't regulations and monetary mismanagement had more to do with oil shocks in the late 70s, early 80s and 2008 than anything else? Of course, one should also factor in rising demand (mostly due to China & India), that certainly played a role as well. Very good point about prices & moving away from oil. Just as the price of crude rises too, shale oil will become more attractive.
@UTubekookdetector in 08, the price of gas went through the roof predominantly because demand pushed past available supply. the price went mad, more producers came online and we also eased our demand leaving loads of excess supply. many of the oil exporters made commitments when gas went up so they couldn't withdraw supply and the price crashed. demand has slowly been creeping up again. it will continue to go up, come down a little then go up again and down etc
hey utube, i don't know where i stand on PO. imo, the idea that oil is a finite resource is quite plausible esp because many of the stats you cite are govt stats and i simply don't trust those. when morons like msz start trolling about speculators though, that's when i realize they have no idea what they are talking about. if they further suggest that govt holds the solution to a potential problem they lose all possibility of redemption
58R: Several very intelligent people have hypothesized about the reality of abiotic oil, but that has not been proven at this point. I don't consider the EIA to be highly partisan, you have the API too (I cited them at the link under the vid), they're not an arm of the gov't. You're right, MSZ is clueless on speculators. Many large oil companies (such as BP, Exxon) publish data on the amount of undiscovered, technically recoverable natural gas & oil. Thanks for your comments.
@UTubekookdetector as far as i known abiotic was debunked, but who knows? what i know is that govt shouldn't be subsidizing energy of any kind. i take a bit of a hardcore libertarian view on this because i believe govt should not be paying for and subsidizing infrastructure either, nor should they diminish risk. when we have a level playing field, the best energy mix will emerge along with the best transport systems,etc
58R: I concur with that my friend. We have a lot in common, you're a good man and I wish we had 535 duplicates of you in Congress, we wouldn't be in this mess now. Subsidies=market distortion, gov't picks winners and losers, rent-seeking galore.
To her credit, she's not one of those insane LPL retards with intellects that must be quantified by the minuscule measurements of trollery and/or dumbshittery (aka, anyone that sounds as mind-numbingly STUPID as McAnusThrustX)
100 billion barrles of oil in the outer contenental shelf. WOW sounds like alot untill you realize only 14% is recoverable and the planet uses a billion barrles every 11 days.
MSZ: You calling me a troll is pretty daft. You spam channels all day long. The OCS (my data comes from the EIA) is just a small part of all the "undiscovered & technically recoverable" oil and natural gas in the US proper. I made sure to mention what of those resources were recoverable and what is not. You act as if I thought it was all recoverable. Ever thought of condensing your rants into 1 comment? Matt Simmons' death doesn't change the fact he was wrong. Any comments on speculation?
MSZ: I'm noticing a trend, you seem to be a hit-and-run Marxist, when the going gets tough, the tough get going. Any comments on my refutation of your talking points on speculation or do you concede? You've also failed to respond to my points on shale, namely technological advances & how the price of crude (if it continues to rise) will make it more profitable. Don't forget about the points I made concerning manufacturing, health care and agriculture. You spend more time on YT than I do.
MSZ: I'm still waiting for your response to me on market speculation, unless you've conceded? In addition, you wanted SS payroll taxes applied to all personal income, ok--let's do a flat personal & corporate income tax rate too.
@UTubekookdetector Why would I concede to something I have yet to respond to. I alredy told you one issue at a time. I responded to your very weak case aginst Global Warming on your channel and the links are on my page.
I want to know if you are going to concede on the ignorant statements you made on the Israel/Palestine conflict by parroting the revisionist historian and carrer liar Joan Peters by saying "There is no such thing as a Palestinian." I refuted this on Athenas channel.
MSZ: If you want to debate AGW (or Israel), keep it on my channel and yours, it wasn't a topic here so don't segue. You can't stay on subject very well, you're bouncing around like a ping-pong ball. If you're going to post on this vid, keep your comments related to the vid topics. I still haven't seen you respond to my rebuttal of your comments here. Better get to it little girl.
Structural-Functionalism, the social prospective documented and founded by Emile is the basis of conservative ideology. Basically, it is about the status quo. Knowing society as it is understanding how functions and structures in society work together. It counters the whole idea that change is necessary. However, if you make a stain and don't fix it, it'll just grow moldy and get worse. That is the problem with conservative-libertarianism. It doesn't address problems as they get worse.
SmartGuy4today 5 months ago
Problem you have with your views UTubekookdetector is that a lot of it can be debunked with just pure knowledge of human beings. I don't disagree with you that Z is a fucking coward. I chatted with her and had her gay boyfriend stalk me. So I know how ghastly and annoying it is to deal with her. But I do disagree with you when it comes to the principles behind socialism and individualism. Simply this, humans are not pure individualistic and cannot survive on their own. This is a proven fact.
SmartGuy4today 5 months ago
Thus we have to depend on each other as a group in order to survive. Humans don't have what it takes to survive on their own in an isolated world. This reality is what destroys the foundation behind conservative libertarianism. And yes, you would be correct with what you have said in how liberal-progressive ideology ends up making matters worse. However, at least they actual problems. They do tend to over-exaggerate, ignore, and become completely arrogant. But they do acknowledge actual problems
SmartGuy4today 5 months ago
They just shouldn't be the problem solvers is what I am saying. They do make valid points once the exaggeration has been filtered about what needs to be changed. And does differ from you conservative-libertarians who tend to ignore problems in their entirety, even though your kind tends to not inflate already established system, which is a positive quality. The ones who know how to be great problem solvers are the intellectual geolibertarian communitarians like me.
SmartGuy4today 5 months ago
We have keep the facts in check and not ignore them when we face the problems in our society.
Here are the facts:
1) Humans must depend on others in order to survive. We didn't evolve claws to defend ourselves from other animals. We had to invent and build up on prior knowledge to improve our technology and its utility. However, we don't possess the ability to acquire everything necessary to have that technology. Take a gun for instance, did you bought it or made it? Market = dependency.
SmartGuy4today 5 months ago
Second fact: Humans are imperfect. This is proven in science, religion, literature, history, and ect... Thus everything we say holds an element of truth and an element of falsehood. And there is nothing we can individually do about it. It is part of the nature of an individual human mind. That we just cannot conceive of the entire knowledge of the universe and thus we have to invent knowledge to fill in the gaps of what we don't know or assume we know without full or prior knowledge.
SmartGuy4today 5 months ago
This makes Liberals and Conservatives right and wrong at the same time.
You ultimately have to pick at the pieces between the two to find the truth and use non-faith based examinations to validate the true picture. This requires holding a consensus, an intellectual consensus to put together each of these pieces as a whole. This is why communitarians are the only problem solvers. It is based on facts. However, we are not that good at finding problems nor are we good at structural-functionalism.
SmartGuy4today 5 months ago
SMART: "Humans don't have what it takes" I'm not here to discuss that, really. Nobody has a perfect solution, there will be winners & losers no matter what. Again, I'd limit Congress to Article I Section VIII and only those duties. It's the fact that they've strayed from that--there's the origin of many of our problems. Now, please only post comments specifically related to the vid topics, thanks.
UTubekookdetector 5 months ago
SMART: Most of your comments really don't have anything to do with the video topic, just a lot of painting with a broad-brush (I did delete your comment about palestine-Israel as it is not germane). You may disagree with me on my views of socialism, but it's simply not enshrined in the Constitution, unless you want to limit it to Congress' powers granted in Aritcle I Section VIII. "address problems as they get worse" I would assume that you're assuming we've had a free market?
UTubekookdetector 5 months ago
They do. But I am not specifying my self a simple conclusion of what I was drawing off from. From Miss Zitface, I was analyzing how liberals are stupid little fucktards that keep messing up our society and I was then conveying this to you in similarity to what is wrong with us all. Perhaps I was conveying too much at once, but the point is that Zitface is a human and as a human "she" is no different from the rest of us. Flawed, stupid, and completely absurd in every way.
SmartGuy4today 5 months ago
They do. But I am not specifying my self a simple conclusion of what I was drawing off from. From Miss Zitface, I was analyzing how liberals are stupid little fucktards that keep messing up our society and I was then conveying this to you in similarity to what is wrong with us all. Perhaps I was conveying too much at once, but the point is that Zitface is a human and as a human "she" is no different from the rest of us. Flawed, stupid, and completely absurd in every way.
SmartGuy4today 5 months ago
Oh we still have hundreds of years until we start seeing a strong peak in the declining of oil reservoirs. There is just that much life that had died. LOL! I mean we have had life roaming around for billions of years, thus he hold billions of years worth in fossil fuels and it is going to take more than a century or two to deplete all of that even if over ten billion humans regularly use fossil fuels. I can understand not using fossil fuels due to culture, but please don't those that do use it.
SmartGuy4today 5 months ago
Sorry I was running low on text. Please don't attack those who do use fossil fuels. We can argue there should be regulations to make the output less disastrous to our overall economy. We can argue against oil pollution in our neighboring bodies of water, due to the impact on the fishing industry, which is very vital to Southern Economy. So we can find room for agreement and we can perhaps agree to make the regulations more economically sound. Make the regulations a profitable industry it self.
SmartGuy4today 5 months ago
By that I am saying having regulations that do what they are suppose to do and not supersede that purpose. In addition, it might be more economically beneficial to have regulations that produce profit rather than harm industry. I am just throwing that out there.
SmartGuy4today 5 months ago
Total pownage, my friend. You never fail UTKD!
gworksnell 5 months ago
This person also made the claim that Milton Friedman was not a good debater. I'll admit that is a very subjective topic but COME ON! If selling your ideas and opinions is the mark of a strong debate then Milton Friedman is perhaps the best debater of all time. He STILL inspires young people in this country!
jakeyw11 9 months ago
@jakeyw11 If you think Friedman was a good debator go read Paul Diesing refute his Permenant Income theory. Friedman has been discredited ever since the BAM crisis of 82.
MsZeitgeist85 9 months ago
MSZ: Since it seems you're trolling my vid, waiting for someone to make a comment that is off-topic and then seizing upon that (funny how you're not discussing the topics in this vid with me) I'm going to tell you this ONE MORE TIME: If you want to debate Friedman or Israel or any other subject not covered in this vid w/another user you will take it to their channel. Capiche? Did that penetrate that tiny brain pan of yours? You will not be warned again moron, I've grown weary of your stalling.
UTubekookdetector 9 months ago
Nice vid bro, Kudos for showing what a ignorant leftist this one is. I am constantly disgusted by her ludicrous "Israeli terrorists" or "Israeli War crimes" comments. That's how you can tell a true leftist, when they support a terrorist regime over Israel.
I'm going to post your video.
paulvick2002 10 months ago
PAUL: I deeply appreciate it. Although I never really discussed Israel/foreign policy with her at length, I'd agree with what you said. She's one of YT's most prominent sophists. She told me she "was working" at took a one-month sabbatical from our discussion. However, during that time (I guess I did stalk her from afar for a while) she was busy posting nuggets on dozens of other channels.
UTubekookdetector 10 months ago
@paulvick2002 Because Israel is a terrorist state dumbshit.
MsZeitgeist85 9 months ago
@MsZeitgeist85 Oh yeah says who? You? Some dumbass Muslim extremist appeaser? So tell me besides you liberal cowards, what countries recognize Israel as a terrorist state? And the moron in chief you voted in wants Israel to give back land won in battle after being attacked unprovoked? Next he will be giving Texas to Mexico. Your kind seriously makes me gag.
paulvick2002 9 months ago
PAUL: MSZ is definintely looking to segue out of my conversation with her on market speculation & peak oil. I think she's reached the end of her talking points bulletin.
UTubekookdetector 9 months ago
@paulvick2002 1. The speech Obama gave on the 2 state solution is identical to the one that Bush gave in 2008. He said there must be a Palestinian State on the 67 borders with mutually agreed upon swaps. 2. Israel fired the first shot in the 67 war when they Pearl Harbored Egypt and Syria. Israel started the war. 3. Israel has ZERO legal claim to any of the West Bank, Gaza, and East Jerusalem. That is now my opinion that is the opinion of the World Court.
GO BACK TO SCHOOL YOU'RE WORTHLESS.
MsZeitgeist85 9 months ago
@MsZeitgeist85 Nice try moron trying to change the subject of your baseless claim that Israel is a terrorist state. Out of respect for Detectors wishes I will not explain to you how Egypt started the 6-day war before Israel's air strike and why their occupation is not illegal, on this video.
You will have to come to my page for that you ignorant piece of leftist trash.
paulvick2002 9 months ago
MSZ: Now that Paul has offered you a debate on his channel pertaining to your off-topic comments Z, your next comment here will be a response to one or more (perhaps on market speculation) of the topics I discussed in this vid or you will be on your way. That's your last warning. PS, looking at some of the comments you've made, you have no room to call anyone stupid.
UTubekookdetector 8 months ago
@paulvick2002 paul; i am a lefty and support israel 100%!!!
piperfawn 2 months ago
PIPER: I suggest you see the left side of my channel, all comments are supposed to be on topic. Israel's conflict with displaced Arabs isn't one of the topics. If you want to debate PAUL on that, go to his channel, I guarantee he will oblige you.
UTubekookdetector 2 months ago
@UTubekookdetector msZ doesn't support Israel which has been mentioned here in comments. ostensibly, i was supporting paul's comment as i know his views and agree. thx
piperfawn 2 months ago
PIPER: YW and you'll also notice that I informed everyone that it was NOT an issue dealt with in this vid.
UTubekookdetector 2 months ago
@UTubekookdetector yes, i see that..guess i just am very weary of anti semites.. MERRY CHRISTMAS to you and yours!
piperfawn 2 months ago
SHAD: She used that "I have a life outside of YT" excuse to me, but I would guarantee she's logged into YT more often than I am. I'm LOL-ing too. :)
UTubekookdetector 10 months ago
LOL MsZitGeyser is a douchebag who repeatedly did drive by's with no replies on my comment section. Ms.ZitGeyser needs to kill herself already. Before she becomes the next Loughner.
gworksnell 11 months ago
GWO: Well, I will agree that she's a drive-by Marxist, she comes on strong but as soon as someone pushes back at her, she bails out.
UTubekookdetector 10 months ago
the pricing mechanism is more than capable of dealing with peak oil. if it is real, prices will go up and we will move away from oil. the big problem is that morons like msz keep pushing legislation which impedes that mechanism. they want higher oil prices, then they go after speculators for apparently creating those high prices. anyone who understands markets knows that the specs had very little to do with price spikes in 08
58robbo 11 months ago
58R: Do you agree that gov't regulations and monetary mismanagement had more to do with oil shocks in the late 70s, early 80s and 2008 than anything else? Of course, one should also factor in rising demand (mostly due to China & India), that certainly played a role as well. Very good point about prices & moving away from oil. Just as the price of crude rises too, shale oil will become more attractive.
UTubekookdetector 11 months ago
@UTubekookdetector in 08, the price of gas went through the roof predominantly because demand pushed past available supply. the price went mad, more producers came online and we also eased our demand leaving loads of excess supply. many of the oil exporters made commitments when gas went up so they couldn't withdraw supply and the price crashed. demand has slowly been creeping up again. it will continue to go up, come down a little then go up again and down etc
58robbo 11 months ago
hey utube, i don't know where i stand on PO. imo, the idea that oil is a finite resource is quite plausible esp because many of the stats you cite are govt stats and i simply don't trust those. when morons like msz start trolling about speculators though, that's when i realize they have no idea what they are talking about. if they further suggest that govt holds the solution to a potential problem they lose all possibility of redemption
58robbo 11 months ago
58R: Several very intelligent people have hypothesized about the reality of abiotic oil, but that has not been proven at this point. I don't consider the EIA to be highly partisan, you have the API too (I cited them at the link under the vid), they're not an arm of the gov't. You're right, MSZ is clueless on speculators. Many large oil companies (such as BP, Exxon) publish data on the amount of undiscovered, technically recoverable natural gas & oil. Thanks for your comments.
UTubekookdetector 11 months ago
@UTubekookdetector as far as i known abiotic was debunked, but who knows? what i know is that govt shouldn't be subsidizing energy of any kind. i take a bit of a hardcore libertarian view on this because i believe govt should not be paying for and subsidizing infrastructure either, nor should they diminish risk. when we have a level playing field, the best energy mix will emerge along with the best transport systems,etc
58robbo 11 months ago
58R: I concur with that my friend. We have a lot in common, you're a good man and I wish we had 535 duplicates of you in Congress, we wouldn't be in this mess now. Subsidies=market distortion, gov't picks winners and losers, rent-seeking galore.
UTubekookdetector 11 months ago
To her credit, she's not one of those insane LPL retards with intellects that must be quantified by the minuscule measurements of trollery and/or dumbshittery (aka, anyone that sounds as mind-numbingly STUPID as McAnusThrustX)
QuartuvLarry 11 months ago
100 billion barrles of oil in the outer contenental shelf. WOW sounds like alot untill you realize only 14% is recoverable and the planet uses a billion barrles every 11 days.
MsZeitgeist85 11 months ago
@MsZeitgeist85 you are famous Kook Central!
AthenasConquest 1 month ago
BTW: Matt Simmons will not be making any predictions about the next few years.
He died last year.
MsZeitgeist85 11 months ago
Kookie just because you knock over the chessboard and declare vicotry doesn't mean you have won. I am laughing at this one.
I get enough trolls alredy and I don't spend 24/7 on YT like some people.
MsZeitgeist85 11 months ago
MSZ: You calling me a troll is pretty daft. You spam channels all day long. The OCS (my data comes from the EIA) is just a small part of all the "undiscovered & technically recoverable" oil and natural gas in the US proper. I made sure to mention what of those resources were recoverable and what is not. You act as if I thought it was all recoverable. Ever thought of condensing your rants into 1 comment? Matt Simmons' death doesn't change the fact he was wrong. Any comments on speculation?
UTubekookdetector 11 months ago
MSZ: I'm noticing a trend, you seem to be a hit-and-run Marxist, when the going gets tough, the tough get going. Any comments on my refutation of your talking points on speculation or do you concede? You've also failed to respond to my points on shale, namely technological advances & how the price of crude (if it continues to rise) will make it more profitable. Don't forget about the points I made concerning manufacturing, health care and agriculture. You spend more time on YT than I do.
UTubekookdetector 11 months ago
MSZ: I'm still waiting for your response to me on market speculation, unless you've conceded? In addition, you wanted SS payroll taxes applied to all personal income, ok--let's do a flat personal & corporate income tax rate too.
UTubekookdetector 10 months ago
@UTubekookdetector Why would I concede to something I have yet to respond to. I alredy told you one issue at a time. I responded to your very weak case aginst Global Warming on your channel and the links are on my page.
I want to know if you are going to concede on the ignorant statements you made on the Israel/Palestine conflict by parroting the revisionist historian and carrer liar Joan Peters by saying "There is no such thing as a Palestinian." I refuted this on Athenas channel.
MsZeitgeist85 9 months ago
MSZ: If you want to debate AGW (or Israel), keep it on my channel and yours, it wasn't a topic here so don't segue. You can't stay on subject very well, you're bouncing around like a ping-pong ball. If you're going to post on this vid, keep your comments related to the vid topics. I still haven't seen you respond to my rebuttal of your comments here. Better get to it little girl.
UTubekookdetector 9 months ago