• The shaking resulted from the use of a directed kinetic scalar weapon focused on building 7 using HAARP ELF (Extra Low Frequency) broadcasting. That would have weakened the structure significantly before they "pulled" the building with a small amount of sequentially detonated explosive charges. Building 7 was destroyed last because it was the command center for the 911 psyops.
@tehhhhhd How often do buildings fall under their own weight? For no reason?... Of course he's not gonna have vids of "uncontroled" demolitions. No such thing!
If buildings had the potential to just fall down like that from a fire, like NIST says, who would ever go in one? If I thought this building could fall down on me for no apparent reason, do you think I would be sitting here calmly typing? duh. I'm not a conspiracy nut, but damn, right?
Denial is normal acting b4 this horrible incident. Who could believe own country men did it. WTC7 is crystal clear evidence since it happened and an epic fail and was a turning point to this whole incident. We should understand those who hiding behind total denial. It asks much to admit it was an inside job. It's not wonder that when u show clear evidences they close their eyes and b4 even think "what if..." they call u with names and deny everything.
It would help to show some "uncontrolled demolitions" along with the controlled to have something to refer to. This is retarded, 10 different demolitions that look like another don't prove anything.
@tehhhhhd just search collapsing buildings. demolition = control collapse. or they use a wrecking ball... people probably don't remember wrecking balls and how much force it actually took to destroy a building by hitting it on it's side like that... i am not saying this proves anything, but it looks like every other demolition out there... no different.
@zigginh0 /watch?v=uKeENdyIluI , and there is no such thing as a "non-controlled demolition" part of demolition = controlling it... there are videos of collapsing buildings though...
i mean it could becontrolled because when something collapses it doesnt fall that fast but if it was controlled they would have to pack alot of fire power into that 11 was not a controlled demoiltion they tries to te terrorist but the plane was real a conspiracy is that the illuminati hit it so that they can have an exuse that the terrorist hit it so they can fight in m east 4 oil 4 the nwo order our marines would never fight against us remember the ILLUMINATI HAS ONLY BUT 1 EYE TO SPARE
Funny to see that a couple of simple arguments get ignored every time.It does not matter.Go watch "extreme prejudice".Then you understand why it happened and it fit all together.Exposing the real facts surrounding the CIA’s advance warnings of 9/11 and Iraq’s contributions to the 9/11 investigation.
No evidence for controlled demolition was found its all conspiracy bullshit. The walls would have to be packed with explosives and would have taken months to set up, people would have noticed... Tower 7 fell because the structure became weak from the fires that broke out on various floors, It was left unattended due to Fire Services attending to the twin towers
@DanSVTO3 According to NIST,collum 97 on lvl 12 caused the collapse.Let's say that that one did,then that particulary collumn will only cause a partely collapse,if you look close into it.Not a total collapse.And also woudn't fall the way it did.Never did a scyscraper fall through fire,there are indeed known cases that were burning more severe and longer.And this particulary fire that supposedly started it was already out 2 hours before as well.....
@thepuzzleandsolution Why did it "have to be" hit by a plane to collapse? The building was an inferno and abandoned by all first responders. All that fire will eventually weaken the steel to the point of failure if you just let it burn and that's what happened. It's not being blind, it's fucking common sense. Well... except on all these dumb, shit stained youtube conspiracy videos...
the UNEDITED version of the building 7 collapse can be found at ItWasTyped. com
see for yourself how it did NOT free fall, it collapsed progressively. Look under the 'conspiracy theory' section and find the Building 7 post. Definitive proof that conspiracy theorists are WRONG. Haha!
No plane struck building seven. It had fires burning on a few floors that it was designed to easily withstand. One of the leading demolition experts in Europe took one look at the footage and said it was without question a controlled demolition. 1200 architectural specialists have risked their reputation to campaign for the truth on this specific issue. Building seven is the smoking gun. they did this right out in the open and the people believed whatever they were told.
they where evacuated at 11:52 if i am right, they said pull it at around 5 in the veneing (just moments before the collapse) nothing the government says is true!
Furthermore,you keep going on audio recordings or lack of evidence,but you fail to see the lack of evidence and contradictions from the official report as well.So far,your arguments aren't very strong either.Architects and engineers alike around the world question the official report and they have every right too.This need to be invastigated properly and that didn't happen.Not by a longshot.
The official report state that office fire (lol) took down the building,not fuel fires or explosives.There were cases in other scyscrapers that were burning way longer and intenser and never did that caused an collapse of one.And again,the fire that supposedly caused the collapse was out an hour before.It simple could not have been caused by fire.That all of the collums would brake at the same time and fell the way id did poitns to a controlled demolition.
Agreed.The other towers are not even relevant at this point.WTC 7 is the smoking gun.As said,the fires gone out an hour before in the area according to NIST cause the collapse.It came down symethically,with the first 30 M in free fall,in the classic way of a controlled demolition.All of the load bearing supports would have had to fail at exactly the same time.And it minimizes damage to surrounding structures.C,mon.
That is not true.There are videorecordings that captured the sound of explosions as well.Cops,firemen,witnessess...They all tell the same thing.That they heard loud explosions.If not anything else,i'm going to make a sandwich now :)
The "explosives" theory is a joke. If 9/11 was a controlled demolition then it would have been by far the biggest controlled demolition that mankind has ever done. A controlled demolition of a mere 10 story office building is so loud that it can be clearly heard 5 miles away. And yet not one camera pointed at the WTC captured the slightest bit of sound from explosives going off. Nice try, conspiracy cheerleaders. Go back to making sandwiches at Quiznos where you belong.
There was asked for an investigation that follows national standards andthere is vitually not excuse to NOTt test for it.If they test for explosions back in 1993,why not now? NIST simply stated they did not found any evidence for explosions.They asked them "Did you look?" "No,we did not look for explosions or residue of explosions". Go figure.They are lying and they know it.
It is unscientific,because the evidence/circumstances for it is in fact overwelming,and therefore alone worth investigating for.Because they simply ignore conclusions that could be drawn from the evidence.A hypothesis for the most likely,not the least valid.They didn't even look.Instead they state conclusions that are either false or incorrect.All about the world question this, and not without reason.If all these witnesses heard explosions,why did they not look for it?
So basically it's the other way around.The official report state conclusions that are basically no evidence for and the most likely scenario get ignored,because they don't expect (!) to find any evidence for explosions and therefore no point in looking.That is probaly the most unscientific thing you can do.And you can't do science when all the evidence is taken away,a month later before the FEMA investigaters got there.
@wahooka123 How is that unscientific? If someone said deer antlers took out the towers would you waste time/ money/ resources trying to search for them? No...You can't waste time/ resources/ money trying to satisfy the curiosity of paranoid conspiracy theorists based of theories that have no scientific backing in the first place. Many samples were taken anyway and nobody found any traces of explosives being used.
Video recordings of firemen and eyewitnessess clearly speaks otherwise."We have to bring it down" "the building is about to blow up,move it back" "Keep your eyes on that building,it's coming down." Many eyewitnesses say that they clearly heard explosions.Even reporters recognized it as a controlled demolition.The NIST report has many faults and contradictions with reality.I mean,c,mon.And yeah,you can't prove anything cause they removed all the evidence,wich is a criminal act on itself.
Watch this video and tell me how these demolitions differ from the collapse of WTC7. Hint: it has something to do with SOUND! watch?v=eem7d58gjno&feature=related
Wow, shit, really? When a large building collapses, there's dust at the base? When my pile of uni books collapses there's dust you nutcase. I'd like to point out that in all your controlled demolitions, the floor with the explosives in it crumples first and makes a visible wave pattern in the building. The floors doing most of the falling/crushing in the WTC do NOT. All you have is "Shit guys, there was dust and debris, its a fucking conspiracy!"
@OpinionatedAussie actually they have said that they purposefully pulled (demolition term for control demolished) building 7 you dumbass, only buildings 1 and 2 are attacked
@johnshepherd2011 Actually, only John Kerry said that it was a controlled demolition and was completely shut down by a total lack of evidence and Larry Silverstein, the person whom I assume you're relying on for your assertion, said he used the word pull to mean pull the firemen out of the building. Whether or not this is true, it's the official statement and position, countless inquiries have not shown otherwise and you truthers are all bloody conspiracy theorists. Dumbass.
@OpinionatedAussie Part 1 Actually he said pull IT!(the building)not pull THEM out(the firemen) like you are applying he said.Whatch the video interview with Silverstein its on youtube as you should know."PULL IT" used by demolition teams all over the world basicly..meaning taking down a building.Question who planted those explosives? and do you think that that is done in just a few hours? NO! It takes days maybe weeks! In other words THIS WAS PLANNED and planes was used to cover up that fact..
@OpinionatedAussie Part 2 ..that the building was rigged with explosives.Listen to what the 1st responders say,fire fighters etc. they all say that it was bombs going off in the buildings.Are they all lying??? What about those survivors that was in the basement/garage that said bombs exploded in the basement are they lying? why would they lie? what would they gain by lying?
@MegaCL2011 There are plenty of realistic reasons for why people heard "explosions" in the buildings. They were all filled with mechanical equipment that can and will explode if damaged or on fire, so that's no big supprise to me. If the source of the explosions came from demolition charges, then the sounds would have been extremely audiable for miles. Not one single camera pointed at ground zero captured the sound of explosives going off on 9/11.
@DanSVT03 Good arguement,but what about building 7 then? Everybody allways avoid talking about building 7.I dont buy the storie that a couple of small fires(documented) in a few offices would bring down a whole building,do you?? That building was brought down in controlled fashion witch is admitted by Silverstein himself on video by saying he gave the order of pulling the building(WTC 7)And it takes days maybe weeks to prepare a building for demolition. Planned??
@MegaCL2011 A common tactic for "truthers" is to downplay the size of the fires in WTC 7. The fires in WTC 7 were not "a couple of small fires" by any means. They were much larger and much more intense than "truth seekers" say, per witnesses of the NYFD and NYPD who both predicted the building would eventually collapse. The fires burned for 8 hours completely out of control. That's more than enough to cause a building to collapse especially if you effect critical structural areas.
@MegaCL2011 And the same case with WTC 1&2 holds for WTC 7. You say building 7 was brought down in a "controlled fashon." Ok, well how come there wasn't any audio recorded of those explosions going off either? How come there isn't one single bit of evidence that explosives were used on 9/11 other than the notion of it "looked like" a controlled demolition? How come the vast majority of engineers (including myself) don't believe any of this "truther" nonsense?
this is just one of the mere proof that the 9/11 was an initiative by the us government .i was watching a documentary on national geographic .they told that there used to be a huge gold vault under the wtc and just the day before 9/11 all the gold was shifted to another place.
Occam's razor, “the simplest explanation is most likely the correct one." CD? Yes, follow the money and reasons for doing it and you will have your answer. GWB and his crew are war criminals, Larry A. Silverstein --insurance fraud. These assholes are cooking up another shit storm. What do you think all those FEMA caskets liners are for, growing flowers? :]
@P0ETRYHOUND I have a question for you. It's a question specific to WTC7 that I feel is important as the answer has rather significant ramifications. Here it is. Why do you think that the Fire Department gave a final order to abandon the WTC7 building and surrounding area at 2:30 P.M.? (The building collapsed at 5:20:52 P.M.)
911 was a giant paper shredder there was so much documents in the WTC buildings that would prove cooperate corruption ran rampant among the financial industries. Everything was allowed to happen so Washington can promote the war economy that is ran by Military Industrial Block. Osama was a figure head to point blame to for the tragic events. The corporate tycoons of America allowed it all to happen with forehand knowledge on the attack about to happen.
9/11 happened, because YOU PEOPLE LET IT HAPPEN!. Yes you, a common citizen, who instead of reading books and educating himself, watches TV all day without a single thought in his/her mind and eats like a pig, all kinds of poisons from food industry. Your country has been LONG TIME taken over by the invisible power, wich manifests itself as a "jewish lobby". It has become almost allmighty, because people worship power and are often indifferent to a crime. I.e. majority just dont give a damn.
@Superhero673408 I'd like to ask you the same thing I've asked at least 56 other people here on various YT channels and have yet to get a reply. Why do you think that the Fire Department gave a final order to abandon the WTC7 building and surrounding area at 2:30 P.M.? (The building collapsed at 5:20:52 P.M.)
The area wich supposedly collapsed the building by fire according to the nist report has actually gone out an hour before! Also,nist never explained why wtc 7 fell the first 30 meters in free fall (they did admit it at least).This means there was no resistance whatsoever.It symmetrically fell,wereby all the 30 collums had to break at the same time,in one motion.Wich is impossible.Even demolition experts say it is a classic example of a controlled demolition.Center of the core/penthouse area,etc.
@wahooka123 I'd like to ask you the same thing I've asked at least 57 other people here on various YT channels and have yet to get a reply. Why do you think that the Fire Department gave a final order to abandon the WTC7 building and surrounding area at 2:30 P.M.? (The building collapsed at 5:20:52 P.M.)
That was not a controlled demolition. The other side of the building (the side facing the towers) was gouged open and was like a raging inferno for 3 hours. The fire chief said that the building was going to collapse and then it did. How did they rig that building and towers 1 and 2 with no body noticing?
@ grafikfeat I think you misunderstood me.Focusing on wtc 7,the most likely scenario was a controlled demolition.I was merely replying to an argument before,that in the case they did gave the order to pull wtc 7,they could not have done that the same day,unless it was planned and already there.Prepering for a controlled demolition normally takes weeks,not a few hours,and it is also hard for a team to place them when a building is on fire.So that argument will be a contradiction on itself.
Preparing a building for a controlled demolition takes considerable time and effort.So,even when they admit they pulled the bulding down,they could not have done that the same day.(it collapsed totally at about 5:20 p.m. on the evening of September 11th) Especially not with anybody noticing that.Unless it was already there? One way or another,it makes no sense at all.
@wahooka123 Do you know the Towers were completely closed on weekends in July and August of 2001.
Do you even understand controlled demolition? Charges designed to cut steel are placed on load bearing columns. How can you say it takes considerable time? They don't pull a building down. They cut the legs out from underneath it. That's what the term pull it means. Pull the legs out from under it... Or Drop it. All three buildings fell into their own foot print. Fire did not drop them. Demolition.
I dont remember ever seeing smoke from a fire on building 7 either but I may be mistaken who knows. It just seems like it wouldn't have happened the way it did either...
@allen22390 I'd like to ask you the same thing I've asked at least 55 other people here on various YT channels and have yet to get a reply. Why do you think that the Fire Department gave a final order to abandon the WTC7 building and surrounding area at 2:30 P.M.? (The building collapsed at 5:20:52 P.M.)
Let me see if I have this straight: This conspiracy, perpetrated by George Bush, also had the complicity of John Kerry, of the opposing Democratic Party, who ran against Bush. I see. I guess after the two 110 story buildings were demolished, they saw that maybe people weren't pissed off enough, and decided to throw in a 47-story one for good measure? How diabolical!
Silverstein admitted they pulled the building then John Kerry when asked confirmed just that. John carry when asked about Silverstein's decision to demolish the building:
John Kerry: "I do know that that wall [I do remember] was in danger and I think they made a decision based on the danger [that it had destroying other things] that they did it in a controlled fashion".
Link to the video of Kerry confirming a controlled demolition of building 7:
@AurynThePaladin Silverstein never "admitted" anything. He CLARIFIED that he was talking about pulling the firefighting contingent away from the building.
John Kerry obviously meant WTC 6, which did have cables attached to the remaining structure to pull it down.
Wow you people who believe it was a controlled demoltion are really dumb. How else would a building fall? Gravity pulls downward, not to the side, if I drop a 10lb weight, hell even a 2lb weight, its going to go straight down.
@Username4453 And you think a precision fall straight down make sense as a natural occurrence? Why would one side not start to fall faster than the other because of more weight being on that side? Let me ask you this. Following your logic, you don't need much skill to do a professional demolition. If buildings naturally fall straight down, then all you need is training in explosives. Just light it and boom the building comes straight down. No need to worry about it falling sideways or anything.
watch and you will be amazed. you're theory has no proof or grounding. this shows how it wasn't controlled. first off if it was controlled you would hear explosions. none were heard, only floors smashing into other floors and glass.
All my comments on mainstream media about 9/11 inside job, and other people's ones have been all removed.. funny huh? Open the website of murdered Danny Jowenko who's interview is here on Youtube... his last name and then dot com. The intro will show how building 7 was done.
@barthoedemaker I'd like to ask you the same thing I've asked at least 54 other people here on various YT channels and have yet to get a reply. Why do you think that the Fire Department gave a final order to abandon the WTC7 building and surrounding area at 2:30 P.M.? (The building collapsed at 5:20:52 P.M.)
im no conspiracy theorist but im no asshole either..i would have understood if the fires burned for days at high intensity and a partial collapse occured,this buildings weight was spread out over a bigger area cos of its rectangular shape so the domino collapse from fire seems so damn,,we impossible..hard to look at the vid clip and not think domolition..
@andrewkenworthy I'd like to ask you the same thing I've asked at least 53 other people here on various YT channels and have yet to get a reply. Why do you think that the Fire Department gave a final order to abandon the WTC7 building and surrounding area at 2:30 P.M.? (The building collapsed at 5:20:52 P.M.)
@thebluetarp I'd like to ask you the same thing I've asked at least 52 other people here on various YT channels and have yet to get a reply. Why do you think that the Fire Department gave a final order to abandon the WTC7 building and surrounding area at 2:30 P.M.? (The building collapsed at 5:20:52 P.M.)
Didn't the secret service have their biggest field office there? Could a detonation be a safety precaution incase the building and state secrets within were compromised?
@whitaker4973 i said it was controlled demolition and if you dont see that your blind, and what i mean that it should with stand it, if a building collapses neer building 7 shouldnt eefect it only if building 7 its self is detonated with explosives obviously it going to collapse
Yes, let's supervise an attack from the protected 23rd floor and hope none of the floors below get taken out and that we all die. Idiot video for idiots.
@coolbritannia1979 zogbot trolls, patriotards and other assorted douchestains like yourself, all scared of a new investigation for their respective reasons. lol
@grasshopperjunction scared of a new investigation? you're deluded. you spend your life looking for "answers" to 9/11 because you just can't face the horrible truth. US foreign policy spurned a small band of terrorists into hijacking planes and spilling blood on US soil. true fact, Iraq has had far worse horrors unleashed upon it than we saw on 9/11. and that's heartbreaking, because watching 9/11 from my comfy couch thousands of miles away was already hard enough.
@coolbritannia1979 ....um...ok. So you saw that no plane crashed into this building right? And there was no "jet fuel" to "weaken the steel" to make the building collapse, (even though a fire has never brought down a steel framed building) but yet, it did, at freefall speed, into it's own footprint, and you STILL don't think that it was controlled demolition?? O0
@chris518ny so what if the goverment owns it, doesnt mean they blow it and kill inocent people, and how the hell did they blow it up that quick, so obvious they knew it was going to happen, the us goverment is greedy for oil and wants world dominance, even if it has to wipe out the entire state. TRULEY YOU ARE A SHEEP.
you got to be blind not to realize that this is not controled demolshing, study physics. i lived threw the lebanese civil war and lebanese israeli war and seen buildings hit by missiles at the base of the building several times and didnt collapse this way, this is a new york building, as if it wouldnt resist such pressure. WAKE UP YOU SHEEP
@TheBillynab you got to be def..the cia and american government said it crytsal clear on tv that they destroyed building 7 to get rid of secret documents seing how the cia and other agencys had offices in the building, building 7 was government owned they can blow it up rebuild or color it pink, its there property,just shut the fuck up
WATCH THIS VIDEO ... very hard to find this video!!! please thumbs this up it shows the missile attack pentagon and building 7 demo...my account has been taken down before for posting this..... watch?v=1F_Hhgk78Ng
building 7 report was made but the very people who did it.. same with the commission report and investigation on the towers.. its like a judge killing somebody then giving himself a verdict ... how can you trust or even believe anything theses books say when you know the government put them out there?
Folks just don't want to believe it. It's how religions were created over the millennium. Man sitting in a dark cave staring up at the night sky afraid to think they are alone in all that vastness... It's the same here... The refusal to to believe there are people willing to do this to their fellow countrymen.
There are way too many coincidences here.
Google Marvin Bush. (who?) See what his job was leading up to 9/11. And where it was.
It's OK to be afraid. It's not OK to be complacent.
@grafikfeat Let's see. Marvin Bush was on the board of a company that had a contract to do some security work for the Port Authority Police Dept. So what?
Marvin left that company's board a year before 9/11.
The conspiracy kooks are those who believe in miracles. Miracles are "events that defy the laws of nature". The government's explanation of the collapse of WTC 1,2 and 7 required 3 laws of nature to be violated: Newton's 3rd law of motion, the 2nd law of thermodynamics and the law of conservation of momentum. Furthermore, the 19 kids with no combat experience ran rings around the $multi-trillion defense/security establishment, without challenge, for almost two whole hours. Kooks!
#1- Planned controlled demolition would require convincing radical Muslims (known to al Qaida) to fly jumbo jets precisely into the exact areas necessary to work together with the pre-arranged positioning of dynamite sticks to bring the towers down...or # 2- jumbo jets slamming into the upper floors (which would be easier and more distructive than aiming for the lower floors) would result in a demolition-like effect. Gravity would be the final determining factor.
9/11 was'nt just about attacking Iraq, It was about planting the seed of hatred towards the entire middle east, so we can conduct many wars, not just one. We'll be at war for a very very long time over 9/11.
@dmoneytuttle Bingo!, and it worked well. "Terrorism is the best politic weapon. for nothing drives people harder than a fear of sudden death" Adolf hitler."
@dmoneytuttle No that's my other account. Basically all you truthers are the same, facts eliminate ANY possibility of your stupid theory EVER happening so you try to attack the "person' lol How sad, you have a "faith" based belief that 911 was an inside job with no proof , non. All you do is attack the person, because you have nothing, no facts, just a loser who thinks 911 was an inside job. go die in a fire.
This was no classic controlled demolition, of course they'll try to hide things, these people are extremely crafty. the zombie theory makes a lot of sense, that would make them like 90% of the population. Bet you dont believe in chem trails, gmo's, fixed elections, going to war without taking proper steps, wmd's, social security, bank failures,and all the other lies were fed. I'm sorry but there's no way that building would fall that way just by being hit with debri. Reason for war.
You show this video to a chicken ,and it'll say: 9/11 was INSIDE JOB...
But unfortunatly you show this to million of so called HUMAN beings ,they will tell you...Oh government LOVES us ,government will never do a thing like this!!
They won't even bother go and find out about GMO food or vaccines , water they drink or the CHEMTRAILED air they breath !
@dmoneytuttle Only a lunatic would believe in this controlled demolition garbage:
Firefighter: "You see where the white smoke is, you see it leaning like this? It's definetley coming down, there's no way to stop it!
/watch?v=WnYBX6QT0R4
Reporter: "The brown building, the tall one, is number 7 , World Trade Center, I've heard several different reports from several different officers now, that this is the building that is going to come down next"
@dmoneytuttle Where is the river of detonation cords that can be seen if it was a classic controlled demolition? where are the multiple bright flashes from explosions that should be seen if if there actually any were explosives? Where are the squibs (REAL squibs) that should be seen on all demolitions? A job that big would take 6 months to prep, how did they do it with the employees inside, considering you have to strip a building bare to get to it's support? Were the workers zombies?
@NWODisinfoAgent they shut parts of the elevators down for SO called maintance, so well over 5-6 months, also did the same in towers 1 +2 :) oh and armed guards were present thoughout this period of time.
Jewish activist/toilet paper mogul Sol Weinbergwitz says: “It isn’t much of a leap to go from ‘I don’t buy the official 9/11 story’ to ‘Israel was involved with 9/11.’ That’s really what some of them think.” (Yep, that’s what some of them think.)
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
also google "An Architect for 9/11 Twoof" DONT donate to scam artists! Vote Real SCIENCE! Trust me the last thing these guys want is a real investigation, it would prove them all wrong! That's why they are in the business, because they know the investigation will never happen.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
google "So I decided to check in on AE911..." you'll find out they all lie about science to make money, and they train you to refute real science as "physically impossible" so you keep believing their bullshit. HUGE money scam for donations that go right in the pocket of Mr.Gage's private bank. When the Dylan Avery, Jason Bermas "lie" movement died, and Alex jone's stopped 911 to push NWO, AE911 came up to revive the scam. Don't be fooled, they pocket donations and spread false science.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Just because there were a lot of cover ups for national security and foreign policy reasons, don't let that government deception fool you into thinking they are lying because they PULLED THE FUCKING THING OFF!! Apples and Oranges is an understatement for this kind of logic.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
When 911 happened, Bush was probably pissed it wasn't Saddam that did it, so he tried to squeeze him in there anyway for daddy. You guys have to think about all the factors, inside job make NO SENSE to a logical person who breaks it down.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
We've done more fucked up shit to countries with just the pre-text of "helping our allies". They wouldn't need to pull off something as intricate as 911 to go to war. If the president wants to go to war? He can very well. Noone was behind the Iraq war, or Vietnam war, but you're saying they had to pull off 911 to go to fucking afghanistan! lol If 911 was fake they would have just said Saddam did it, we would have bought it, Bush's been trying to get him for years. "inside job" YOUR NUTS!
@johnnyblazeksgldp You're right. If people cannot put up what they believe to be the truth (or there opinion) then there is no point in the internet.
skiddypantsful 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
AE911Truth Experts Speak Out: 9/11 Explosive evidence
(43 Technical & Building Professionals are Calling for a New Investigation into the Events of 9/11)
Full Length Documentary:
watch?v=YW6mJOqRDI4
ae911truth org
patriotsquestion911 com
pavson77 5 days ago
this video is the reason why sopa was created
johnnyblazeksgldp 1 week ago
This guy sounds like a fucking twat! Muslim lover
mikeyboy000 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• The shaking resulted from the use of a directed kinetic scalar weapon focused on building 7 using HAARP ELF (Extra Low Frequency) broadcasting. That would have weakened the structure significantly before they "pulled" the building with a small amount of sequentially detonated explosive charges. Building 7 was destroyed last because it was the command center for the 911 psyops.
altgeldrarities 2 weeks ago
@tehhhhhd How often do buildings fall under their own weight? For no reason?... Of course he's not gonna have vids of "uncontroled" demolitions. No such thing!
J30A1TypeR 3 weeks ago
If buildings had the potential to just fall down like that from a fire, like NIST says, who would ever go in one? If I thought this building could fall down on me for no apparent reason, do you think I would be sitting here calmly typing? duh. I'm not a conspiracy nut, but damn, right?
moshcustom 3 weeks ago
youtube/uFJa9WUy5QI
now shut the fuck up.
niccilomachiaveli 1 month ago
Denial is normal acting b4 this horrible incident. Who could believe own country men did it. WTC7 is crystal clear evidence since it happened and an epic fail and was a turning point to this whole incident. We should understand those who hiding behind total denial. It asks much to admit it was an inside job. It's not wonder that when u show clear evidences they close their eyes and b4 even think "what if..." they call u with names and deny everything.
Scumbot404 1 month ago
It would help to show some "uncontrolled demolitions" along with the controlled to have something to refer to. This is retarded, 10 different demolitions that look like another don't prove anything.
tehhhhhd 1 month ago
@tehhhhhd just search collapsing buildings. demolition = control collapse. or they use a wrecking ball... people probably don't remember wrecking balls and how much force it actually took to destroy a building by hitting it on it's side like that... i am not saying this proves anything, but it looks like every other demolition out there... no different.
jbkibs 5 days ago
You should have shown some non-controlled demolitions too...
zigginh0 1 month ago
@zigginh0
i was just about to say that, how would a non or un-controlled demolition look? i think the same
Anndreeaas1 1 month ago
@zigginh0 /watch?v=uKeENdyIluI , and there is no such thing as a "non-controlled demolition" part of demolition = controlling it... there are videos of collapsing buildings though...
jbkibs 5 days ago
i mean it could becontrolled because when something collapses it doesnt fall that fast but if it was controlled they would have to pack alot of fire power into that 11 was not a controlled demoiltion they tries to te terrorist but the plane was real a conspiracy is that the illuminati hit it so that they can have an exuse that the terrorist hit it so they can fight in m east 4 oil 4 the nwo order our marines would never fight against us remember the ILLUMINATI HAS ONLY BUT 1 EYE TO SPARE
infinityward0 2 months ago
Funny to see that a couple of simple arguments get ignored every time.It does not matter.Go watch "extreme prejudice".Then you understand why it happened and it fit all together.Exposing the real facts surrounding the CIA’s advance warnings of 9/11 and Iraq’s contributions to the 9/11 investigation.
wahooka123 2 months ago
No evidence for controlled demolition was found its all conspiracy bullshit. The walls would have to be packed with explosives and would have taken months to set up, people would have noticed... Tower 7 fell because the structure became weak from the fires that broke out on various floors, It was left unattended due to Fire Services attending to the twin towers
TheMotherfunkster 2 months ago
Comment removed
gdtrfbad 2 months ago
@DanSVTO3 According to NIST,collum 97 on lvl 12 caused the collapse.Let's say that that one did,then that particulary collumn will only cause a partely collapse,if you look close into it.Not a total collapse.And also woudn't fall the way it did.Never did a scyscraper fall through fire,there are indeed known cases that were burning more severe and longer.And this particulary fire that supposedly started it was already out 2 hours before as well.....
wahooka123 2 months ago
@thepuzzleandsolution Why did it "have to be" hit by a plane to collapse? The building was an inferno and abandoned by all first responders. All that fire will eventually weaken the steel to the point of failure if you just let it burn and that's what happened. It's not being blind, it's fucking common sense. Well... except on all these dumb, shit stained youtube conspiracy videos...
DanSVT03 2 months ago
@DanSVT03 Inferno? haha lol
XxRushx 2 months ago
@XxRushx There you go, downplay an uncontrolled fire allowed to grow as big as it wants to inside a fully operational 47 story sky scraper.
Enough of your bullshit, you've got stuff to do. Get those fucking pizzas delivered!
DanSVT03 2 months ago
IS this the honey badger guy?????????
idistroyer 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
the UNEDITED version of the building 7 collapse can be found at ItWasTyped. com
see for yourself how it did NOT free fall, it collapsed progressively. Look under the 'conspiracy theory' section and find the Building 7 post. Definitive proof that conspiracy theorists are WRONG. Haha!
culturebully3 3 months ago
No plane struck building seven. It had fires burning on a few floors that it was designed to easily withstand. One of the leading demolition experts in Europe took one look at the footage and said it was without question a controlled demolition. 1200 architectural specialists have risked their reputation to campaign for the truth on this specific issue. Building seven is the smoking gun. they did this right out in the open and the people believed whatever they were told.
mrkamikaze101 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
We all need to start spreading the word to people other than ourselves. I get all my anti-NWO and illuminati shirts at… wwwcafepresscom/TheFactShop
factshop 3 months ago
they where evacuated at 11:52 if i am right, they said pull it at around 5 in the veneing (just moments before the collapse) nothing the government says is true!
sh9683 3 months ago
i mean if you're gonna blow up you're own towers atleast make it look real god the goverment is really fucking reatrded these days
nuttyjunior 3 months ago
Furthermore,you keep going on audio recordings or lack of evidence,but you fail to see the lack of evidence and contradictions from the official report as well.So far,your arguments aren't very strong either.Architects and engineers alike around the world question the official report and they have every right too.This need to be invastigated properly and that didn't happen.Not by a longshot.
wahooka123 3 months ago
The official report state that office fire (lol) took down the building,not fuel fires or explosives.There were cases in other scyscrapers that were burning way longer and intenser and never did that caused an collapse of one.And again,the fire that supposedly caused the collapse was out an hour before.It simple could not have been caused by fire.That all of the collums would brake at the same time and fell the way id did poitns to a controlled demolition.
wahooka123 3 months ago
Agreed.The other towers are not even relevant at this point.WTC 7 is the smoking gun.As said,the fires gone out an hour before in the area according to NIST cause the collapse.It came down symethically,with the first 30 M in free fall,in the classic way of a controlled demolition.All of the load bearing supports would have had to fail at exactly the same time.And it minimizes damage to surrounding structures.C,mon.
wahooka123 3 months ago
That is not true.There are videorecordings that captured the sound of explosions as well.Cops,firemen,witnessess...They all tell the same thing.That they heard loud explosions.If not anything else,i'm going to make a sandwich now :)
wahooka123 3 months ago
The "explosives" theory is a joke. If 9/11 was a controlled demolition then it would have been by far the biggest controlled demolition that mankind has ever done. A controlled demolition of a mere 10 story office building is so loud that it can be clearly heard 5 miles away. And yet not one camera pointed at the WTC captured the slightest bit of sound from explosives going off. Nice try, conspiracy cheerleaders. Go back to making sandwiches at Quiznos where you belong.
DanSVT03 3 months ago
There was asked for an investigation that follows national standards andthere is vitually not excuse to NOTt test for it.If they test for explosions back in 1993,why not now? NIST simply stated they did not found any evidence for explosions.They asked them "Did you look?" "No,we did not look for explosions or residue of explosions". Go figure.They are lying and they know it.
wahooka123 3 months ago
It is unscientific,because the evidence/circumstances for it is in fact overwelming,and therefore alone worth investigating for.Because they simply ignore conclusions that could be drawn from the evidence.A hypothesis for the most likely,not the least valid.They didn't even look.Instead they state conclusions that are either false or incorrect.All about the world question this, and not without reason.If all these witnesses heard explosions,why did they not look for it?
wahooka123 3 months ago
So basically it's the other way around.The official report state conclusions that are basically no evidence for and the most likely scenario get ignored,because they don't expect (!) to find any evidence for explosions and therefore no point in looking.That is probaly the most unscientific thing you can do.And you can't do science when all the evidence is taken away,a month later before the FEMA investigaters got there.
wahooka123 3 months ago
@wahooka123 How is that unscientific? If someone said deer antlers took out the towers would you waste time/ money/ resources trying to search for them? No...You can't waste time/ resources/ money trying to satisfy the curiosity of paranoid conspiracy theorists based of theories that have no scientific backing in the first place. Many samples were taken anyway and nobody found any traces of explosives being used.
TZMareThieves3 3 months ago
Video recordings of firemen and eyewitnessess clearly speaks otherwise."We have to bring it down" "the building is about to blow up,move it back" "Keep your eyes on that building,it's coming down." Many eyewitnesses say that they clearly heard explosions.Even reporters recognized it as a controlled demolition.The NIST report has many faults and contradictions with reality.I mean,c,mon.And yeah,you can't prove anything cause they removed all the evidence,wich is a criminal act on itself.
wahooka123 3 months ago
There's a reason why this video has no audio.
Watch this video and tell me how these demolitions differ from the collapse of WTC7. Hint: it has something to do with SOUND! watch?v=eem7d58gjno&feature=related
ryeb00 3 months ago
Wow, shit, really? When a large building collapses, there's dust at the base? When my pile of uni books collapses there's dust you nutcase. I'd like to point out that in all your controlled demolitions, the floor with the explosives in it crumples first and makes a visible wave pattern in the building. The floors doing most of the falling/crushing in the WTC do NOT. All you have is "Shit guys, there was dust and debris, its a fucking conspiracy!"
OpinionatedAussie 3 months ago
@OpinionatedAussie actually they have said that they purposefully pulled (demolition term for control demolished) building 7 you dumbass, only buildings 1 and 2 are attacked
johnshepherd2011 3 months ago
Comment removed
OpinionatedAussie 3 months ago
@johnshepherd2011 Actually, only John Kerry said that it was a controlled demolition and was completely shut down by a total lack of evidence and Larry Silverstein, the person whom I assume you're relying on for your assertion, said he used the word pull to mean pull the firemen out of the building. Whether or not this is true, it's the official statement and position, countless inquiries have not shown otherwise and you truthers are all bloody conspiracy theorists. Dumbass.
OpinionatedAussie 3 months ago
@OpinionatedAussie Part 1 Actually he said pull IT!(the building)not pull THEM out(the firemen) like you are applying he said.Whatch the video interview with Silverstein its on youtube as you should know."PULL IT" used by demolition teams all over the world basicly..meaning taking down a building.Question who planted those explosives? and do you think that that is done in just a few hours? NO! It takes days maybe weeks! In other words THIS WAS PLANNED and planes was used to cover up that fact..
MegaCL2011 3 months ago
@OpinionatedAussie Part 2 ..that the building was rigged with explosives.Listen to what the 1st responders say,fire fighters etc. they all say that it was bombs going off in the buildings.Are they all lying??? What about those survivors that was in the basement/garage that said bombs exploded in the basement are they lying? why would they lie? what would they gain by lying?
MegaCL2011 3 months ago
@MegaCL2011 There are plenty of realistic reasons for why people heard "explosions" in the buildings. They were all filled with mechanical equipment that can and will explode if damaged or on fire, so that's no big supprise to me. If the source of the explosions came from demolition charges, then the sounds would have been extremely audiable for miles. Not one single camera pointed at ground zero captured the sound of explosives going off on 9/11.
DanSVT03 3 months ago
@DanSVT03 Good arguement,but what about building 7 then? Everybody allways avoid talking about building 7.I dont buy the storie that a couple of small fires(documented) in a few offices would bring down a whole building,do you?? That building was brought down in controlled fashion witch is admitted by Silverstein himself on video by saying he gave the order of pulling the building(WTC 7)And it takes days maybe weeks to prepare a building for demolition. Planned??
MegaCL2011 3 months ago
@MegaCL2011 A common tactic for "truthers" is to downplay the size of the fires in WTC 7. The fires in WTC 7 were not "a couple of small fires" by any means. They were much larger and much more intense than "truth seekers" say, per witnesses of the NYFD and NYPD who both predicted the building would eventually collapse. The fires burned for 8 hours completely out of control. That's more than enough to cause a building to collapse especially if you effect critical structural areas.
DanSVT03 3 months ago
@MegaCL2011 And the same case with WTC 1&2 holds for WTC 7. You say building 7 was brought down in a "controlled fashon." Ok, well how come there wasn't any audio recorded of those explosions going off either? How come there isn't one single bit of evidence that explosives were used on 9/11 other than the notion of it "looked like" a controlled demolition? How come the vast majority of engineers (including myself) don't believe any of this "truther" nonsense?
DanSVT03 3 months ago
@DanSVT03 buildings just don't collapse like that without a controlled demolition
NverEnoughDeathMetal 2 months ago
@NverEnoughDeathMetal Why??
DanSVT03 2 months ago
this is just one of the mere proof that the 9/11 was an initiative by the us government .i was watching a documentary on national geographic .they told that there used to be a huge gold vault under the wtc and just the day before 9/11 all the gold was shifted to another place.
bduttay 3 months ago
lies
macgooden 3 months ago
Occam's razor, “the simplest explanation is most likely the correct one." CD? Yes, follow the money and reasons for doing it and you will have your answer. GWB and his crew are war criminals, Larry A. Silverstein --insurance fraud. These assholes are cooking up another shit storm. What do you think all those FEMA caskets liners are for, growing flowers? :]
Argibon 3 months ago 6
The twin towers and building 7 were controlled demolition jobs.
P0ETRYHOUND 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@P0ETRYHOUND I have a question for you. It's a question specific to WTC7 that I feel is important as the answer has rather significant ramifications. Here it is. Why do you think that the Fire Department gave a final order to abandon the WTC7 building and surrounding area at 2:30 P.M.? (The building collapsed at 5:20:52 P.M.)
azul8811 3 months ago
1 and 2 towers were NOT a controlled demolition
2000tc88 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
911 was a giant paper shredder there was so much documents in the WTC buildings that would prove cooperate corruption ran rampant among the financial industries. Everything was allowed to happen so Washington can promote the war economy that is ran by Military Industrial Block. Osama was a figure head to point blame to for the tragic events. The corporate tycoons of America allowed it all to happen with forehand knowledge on the attack about to happen.
MDSVes 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
9/11 happened, because YOU PEOPLE LET IT HAPPEN!. Yes you, a common citizen, who instead of reading books and educating himself, watches TV all day without a single thought in his/her mind and eats like a pig, all kinds of poisons from food industry. Your country has been LONG TIME taken over by the invisible power, wich manifests itself as a "jewish lobby". It has become almost allmighty, because people worship power and are often indifferent to a crime. I.e. majority just dont give a damn.
juicejon1 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Superhero673408 I'd like to ask you the same thing I've asked at least 56 other people here on various YT channels and have yet to get a reply. Why do you think that the Fire Department gave a final order to abandon the WTC7 building and surrounding area at 2:30 P.M.? (The building collapsed at 5:20:52 P.M.)
azul8811 4 months ago
The area wich supposedly collapsed the building by fire according to the nist report has actually gone out an hour before! Also,nist never explained why wtc 7 fell the first 30 meters in free fall (they did admit it at least).This means there was no resistance whatsoever.It symmetrically fell,wereby all the 30 collums had to break at the same time,in one motion.Wich is impossible.Even demolition experts say it is a classic example of a controlled demolition.Center of the core/penthouse area,etc.
wahooka123 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@wahooka123 I'd like to ask you the same thing I've asked at least 57 other people here on various YT channels and have yet to get a reply. Why do you think that the Fire Department gave a final order to abandon the WTC7 building and surrounding area at 2:30 P.M.? (The building collapsed at 5:20:52 P.M.)
azul8811 4 months ago
That was not a controlled demolition. The other side of the building (the side facing the towers) was gouged open and was like a raging inferno for 3 hours. The fire chief said that the building was going to collapse and then it did. How did they rig that building and towers 1 and 2 with no body noticing?
rangers94ism 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
James Bond could figure out what really happend :)
SamirasoFi 4 months ago
@ grafikfeat I think you misunderstood me.Focusing on wtc 7,the most likely scenario was a controlled demolition.I was merely replying to an argument before,that in the case they did gave the order to pull wtc 7,they could not have done that the same day,unless it was planned and already there.Prepering for a controlled demolition normally takes weeks,not a few hours,and it is also hard for a team to place them when a building is on fire.So that argument will be a contradiction on itself.
wahooka123 4 months ago
@wahooka123 Yes... and they had weeks to set them was what I was saying. Sorry.
grafikfeat 4 months ago
Preparing a building for a controlled demolition takes considerable time and effort.So,even when they admit they pulled the bulding down,they could not have done that the same day.(it collapsed totally at about 5:20 p.m. on the evening of September 11th) Especially not with anybody noticing that.Unless it was already there? One way or another,it makes no sense at all.
wahooka123 4 months ago
@wahooka123 Do you know the Towers were completely closed on weekends in July and August of 2001.
Do you even understand controlled demolition? Charges designed to cut steel are placed on load bearing columns. How can you say it takes considerable time? They don't pull a building down. They cut the legs out from underneath it. That's what the term pull it means. Pull the legs out from under it... Or Drop it. All three buildings fell into their own foot print. Fire did not drop them. Demolition.
grafikfeat 4 months ago
@grafikfeat Jesus, you are such a dumbass. Get your head out of your ass buddy, and wake the fuck up, Enough with the Pseudo-intelligent bullshit
ElectricTurkey1 4 months ago
@ElectricTurkey1 Offer something intelligent ok? Go sit back down asshole.
grafikfeat 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Silverstein never "admitted" anything. He CLARIFIED that he was talking about pulling the firefighting contingent away from the building.
John Kerry obviously meant WTC 6, which did have cables attached to the remaining structure to pull it down.
PoetryHound 4 months ago
I dont remember ever seeing smoke from a fire on building 7 either but I may be mistaken who knows. It just seems like it wouldn't have happened the way it did either...
allen22390 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@allen22390 I'd like to ask you the same thing I've asked at least 55 other people here on various YT channels and have yet to get a reply. Why do you think that the Fire Department gave a final order to abandon the WTC7 building and surrounding area at 2:30 P.M.? (The building collapsed at 5:20:52 P.M.)
azul8811 4 months ago
Let me see if I have this straight: This conspiracy, perpetrated by George Bush, also had the complicity of John Kerry, of the opposing Democratic Party, who ran against Bush. I see. I guess after the two 110 story buildings were demolished, they saw that maybe people weren't pissed off enough, and decided to throw in a 47-story one for good measure? How diabolical!
Grvthang 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WE HAVE THE VIDEO OF WTC7 BEING DEMOLISHED. THE VIDEO SHOWS THE EXPLOSIONS AND IT HAS THE AUDIO. ...ARREST LARRY SILVERSTEIN, NOW!!!
SEARCH: "!MUST WATCH NOW! Visible Explosions !NEW VIDEO! SEPT 2011 WTC Building 7 Controlled Demolition"
Born2Flesh 4 months ago
i completely forgot about building 7. to all the victims i am sorry and we need justice for yall.( r.i.p to my wonderful cousin on flight 11)
babypink912 4 months ago
Silverstein admitted they pulled the building then John Kerry when asked confirmed just that. John carry when asked about Silverstein's decision to demolish the building:
John Kerry: "I do know that that wall [I do remember] was in danger and I think they made a decision based on the danger [that it had destroying other things] that they did it in a controlled fashion".
Link to the video of Kerry confirming a controlled demolition of building 7:
/watch?v=rJsJjYwYOAA&feature=related
AurynThePaladin 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AurynThePaladin Silverstein never "admitted" anything. He CLARIFIED that he was talking about pulling the firefighting contingent away from the building.
John Kerry obviously meant WTC 6, which did have cables attached to the remaining structure to pull it down.
PoetryHound 4 months ago
Everybody knows that metal columns inside buildings get pulverised simultaneously
fluorescentcentipede 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
How dare anyone think our government (us) was responsible. An intense fire in the building caused building 7 to fall, end of story.
corkystanton 4 months ago
Wow you people who believe it was a controlled demoltion are really dumb. How else would a building fall? Gravity pulls downward, not to the side, if I drop a 10lb weight, hell even a 2lb weight, its going to go straight down.
Username4453 4 months ago
@Username4453 And you think a precision fall straight down make sense as a natural occurrence? Why would one side not start to fall faster than the other because of more weight being on that side? Let me ask you this. Following your logic, you don't need much skill to do a professional demolition. If buildings naturally fall straight down, then all you need is training in explosives. Just light it and boom the building comes straight down. No need to worry about it falling sideways or anything.
visualfxpro 4 months ago 5
everyone knows buildings are suppose to fall over like trees!!!!
SonsOfLiberty65 4 months ago
@SonsOfLiberty65 Yeah everyone know buildings and trees are alike, I've seen a tree collapse in on itself when it was cut across the trunk *sarcasm*.
Username4453 4 months ago
9-11 explained in 3 easy steps.
1. Jews realize world economy unraveling due to usurous monetary policy means USA golem will no longer be able to protect Jews.
2a. Jews stage false flag event to preemptively force regime change, depopulate and destabilize all local threats in Middle East before USA breaks.
2b. Jews force diversity in White countries to thwart future nationalism caused by economic collapse.
3. Shlep downtown for bagel and lox.
redcorona14 4 months ago 2
1 and 2 towers where also controlled demolition
barthoedemaker 4 months ago 24
@barthoedemaker /watch?v=tacYjsS-g6k&feature=colike
watch and you will be amazed. you're theory has no proof or grounding. this shows how it wasn't controlled. first off if it was controlled you would hear explosions. none were heard, only floors smashing into other floors and glass.
chillaxer1993 3 months ago
All my comments on mainstream media about 9/11 inside job, and other people's ones have been all removed.. funny huh? Open the website of murdered Danny Jowenko who's interview is here on Youtube... his last name and then dot com. The intro will show how building 7 was done.
barthoedemaker 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@barthoedemaker I'd like to ask you the same thing I've asked at least 54 other people here on various YT channels and have yet to get a reply. Why do you think that the Fire Department gave a final order to abandon the WTC7 building and surrounding area at 2:30 P.M.? (The building collapsed at 5:20:52 P.M.)
azul8811 4 months ago
/watch?v=IO1ps1mzU8o
q41n 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
/watch?v=j5FhQc-LJ-o /watch?v=5qFsjdymqSk /watch?v=KhdppHwUJ9k /watch?v=zhnNy5EsebA /watch?v=iGqjzFQvfdI /watch?v=WxqoChniKVU /watch?v=9QWvkAgyIY4 /watch?v=qFpbZ-aLDLY /watch?v=HfmliaqIRBE /watch?v=HSjDCwN2i3w /watch?v=8XRMrMdn0NQ /watch?v=wKuLUu7SQU4 /watch?v=dVutUGDiQN0
megamogx 4 months ago in playlist More videos from thetruthwillout
im no conspiracy theorist but im no asshole either..i would have understood if the fires burned for days at high intensity and a partial collapse occured,this buildings weight was spread out over a bigger area cos of its rectangular shape so the domino collapse from fire seems so damn,,we impossible..hard to look at the vid clip and not think domolition..
andrewkenworthy 4 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
@andrewkenworthy I'd like to ask you the same thing I've asked at least 53 other people here on various YT channels and have yet to get a reply. Why do you think that the Fire Department gave a final order to abandon the WTC7 building and surrounding area at 2:30 P.M.? (The building collapsed at 5:20:52 P.M.)
azul8811 4 months ago
anybody who still believes building 7 collapsed from invisible fires is simply a sheeple moron.
thebluetarp 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@thebluetarp I'd like to ask you the same thing I've asked at least 52 other people here on various YT channels and have yet to get a reply. Why do you think that the Fire Department gave a final order to abandon the WTC7 building and surrounding area at 2:30 P.M.? (The building collapsed at 5:20:52 P.M.)
azul8811 4 months ago
The 911 report doesn't mention building 7 once. They couldn't even pretend to explain it.
betrayyoursoul37 4 months ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
this is fucking retarded...
PSNstewiegriffin3 4 months ago
Didn't the secret service have their biggest field office there? Could a detonation be a safety precaution incase the building and state secrets within were compromised?
coolbritannia1979 4 months ago 6
@coolbritannia1979 thats a very good observation !
ohbuddyiliketowatch 4 months ago
@whitaker4973 i said it was controlled demolition and if you dont see that your blind, and what i mean that it should with stand it, if a building collapses neer building 7 shouldnt eefect it only if building 7 its self is detonated with explosives obviously it going to collapse
TheBillynab 4 months ago
@TheBillynab you comment is contradictory, your saying it's not controlled demolition but it should with stand this? Wtf are u on about
whitaker4973 4 months ago
Yes, let's supervise an attack from the protected 23rd floor and hope none of the floors below get taken out and that we all die. Idiot video for idiots.
coolbritannia1979 4 months ago
@coolbritannia1979 zogbot trolls, patriotards and other assorted douchestains like yourself, all scared of a new investigation for their respective reasons. lol
grasshopperjunction 4 months ago
@grasshopperjunction scared of a new investigation? you're deluded. you spend your life looking for "answers" to 9/11 because you just can't face the horrible truth. US foreign policy spurned a small band of terrorists into hijacking planes and spilling blood on US soil. true fact, Iraq has had far worse horrors unleashed upon it than we saw on 9/11. and that's heartbreaking, because watching 9/11 from my comfy couch thousands of miles away was already hard enough.
coolbritannia1979 4 months ago 2
@coolbritannia1979 ....um...ok. So you saw that no plane crashed into this building right? And there was no "jet fuel" to "weaken the steel" to make the building collapse, (even though a fire has never brought down a steel framed building) but yet, it did, at freefall speed, into it's own footprint, and you STILL don't think that it was controlled demolition?? O0
Not sure if serious....
SaintPatrick33 4 months ago
When the U.S.M.C searched Saddam bin Ladden's Computer, they found this video in a folder named 'Porn'
g10rg0s8574 5 months ago
lol, you can see the penthouse falling right into the middle of the building. It's a clear 100% controlled demo.
qwertymanor 5 months ago 2
lol the 24th floor had a good view too, idiot video. Why the hell would one need to supervise a bombing? What would be the difference?
jaskamiin 5 months ago
@chris518ny so what if the goverment owns it, doesnt mean they blow it and kill inocent people, and how the hell did they blow it up that quick, so obvious they knew it was going to happen, the us goverment is greedy for oil and wants world dominance, even if it has to wipe out the entire state. TRULEY YOU ARE A SHEEP.
TheBillynab 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
As long as all these conspiracy theory wackos do is chat on the internet in their basments, they're harmless.
claton95 5 months ago
you got to be blind not to realize that this is not controled demolshing, study physics. i lived threw the lebanese civil war and lebanese israeli war and seen buildings hit by missiles at the base of the building several times and didnt collapse this way, this is a new york building, as if it wouldnt resist such pressure. WAKE UP YOU SHEEP
TheBillynab 5 months ago
@TheBillynab you got to be def..the cia and american government said it crytsal clear on tv that they destroyed building 7 to get rid of secret documents seing how the cia and other agencys had offices in the building, building 7 was government owned they can blow it up rebuild or color it pink, its there property,just shut the fuck up
chris518ny 5 months ago
cool story,bro.
theonlyhummer 5 months ago
building 7 falls faster than all of the controlled demolitions and it was supposed to be a terrorist who did it? fuck out of my face
ganjamerch 5 months ago
I'd be willing to believe that any building knocked down in any way would produce a lot of dust and debris.
exactomacto 5 months ago
Every blind man sees that this was a controlled takedown.
"Internal fires" my ass.
The commission tried to fraud us all. They should be executed for lying to us.
shevegen 5 months ago 3
Oh yeah, poor structural design made it want to collapse on the same special day 2 others met their fate to trained by the CIA hijackers. How smart.
THELLaser 6 months ago
,,london reports unlikely collapse previous to unlikely collapse..."get 'er dun"...=/
wolfdaddy205 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WATCH THIS VIDEO ... very hard to find this video!!! please thumbs this up it shows the missile attack pentagon and building 7 demo...my account has been taken down before for posting this..... watch?v=1F_Hhgk78Ng
killuminati1871 6 months ago
the building went down after it was reported so yeah
LeggoOreo 6 months ago
@WildFan1985 <<< dissinfo government shill
killuminati1871 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
wow if you believe this you are a retard
ashcmitch88 6 months ago
building 7 report was made but the very people who did it.. same with the commission report and investigation on the towers.. its like a judge killing somebody then giving himself a verdict ... how can you trust or even believe anything theses books say when you know the government put them out there?
killuminati1871 6 months ago
LOL YOU CRAZY PEOPLE ARE CRAZY
JLE102191 6 months ago
Folks just don't want to believe it. It's how religions were created over the millennium. Man sitting in a dark cave staring up at the night sky afraid to think they are alone in all that vastness... It's the same here... The refusal to to believe there are people willing to do this to their fellow countrymen.
There are way too many coincidences here.
Google Marvin Bush. (who?) See what his job was leading up to 9/11. And where it was.
It's OK to be afraid. It's not OK to be complacent.
grafikfeat 6 months ago 2
@grafikfeat Let's see. Marvin Bush was on the board of a company that had a contract to do some security work for the Port Authority Police Dept. So what?
Marvin left that company's board a year before 9/11.
PoetryHound 6 months ago
@PoetryHound I lived in NYC. Do your homework.
Meanwhile... Enjoy your brand of koolaid. It's more bitter than mine.
grafikfeat 6 months ago
Comment removed
bagintree 6 months ago
@bagintree You Win. Hooray.
grafikfeat 6 months ago
@bagintree Ha.
grafikfeat 6 months ago
The conspiracy kooks are those who believe in miracles. Miracles are "events that defy the laws of nature". The government's explanation of the collapse of WTC 1,2 and 7 required 3 laws of nature to be violated: Newton's 3rd law of motion, the 2nd law of thermodynamics and the law of conservation of momentum. Furthermore, the 19 kids with no combat experience ran rings around the $multi-trillion defense/security establishment, without challenge, for almost two whole hours. Kooks!
bloggulator 6 months ago
watch?v=nJ6_WBwgNuM
it reminds you something?
bernuga 6 months ago
#1- Planned controlled demolition would require convincing radical Muslims (known to al Qaida) to fly jumbo jets precisely into the exact areas necessary to work together with the pre-arranged positioning of dynamite sticks to bring the towers down...or # 2- jumbo jets slamming into the upper floors (which would be easier and more distructive than aiming for the lower floors) would result in a demolition-like effect. Gravity would be the final determining factor.
55k3v1n 6 months ago
I feel sorry for the poor brain washed who still believe the government version of events.
keiththegreatest 6 months ago
The problem is not about building 7 collapsing without any reason,but its dust has covered the brains of the sheeple .
yoogoh 6 months ago
171 people are sheep that listen to the Government.
Yogotronx 7 months ago
@Yogotronx More sheep listen to fools making videos all over the internet. Think they have an agenda? Check out my profile and learn the truth
FacesofNewWorldOrder 6 months ago
Rumor is Chuck Norris had a hand in it.
ant4love 7 months ago
@ant4love oh fuck off with your patheic jokes this is serious shit you fucking retard
eminemforlifenoshit 6 months ago
@eminemforlifenoshit Hehe!
ant4love 6 months ago
@ant4love ..
eminemforlifenoshit 6 months ago
why are "thay" supervising the attack, it´s make no sense ??
alisthaboss 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The GOVERNMENT will NEVER investigate themselves! BUT the people can DEMAND IT!........You can DO SOMETHING!!
Go to 9-11cc(.)org please contribute even a few dollars - organized by U.S.Senator Mike Gravel
getbo 7 months ago
9/11 was'nt just about attacking Iraq, It was about planting the seed of hatred towards the entire middle east, so we can conduct many wars, not just one. We'll be at war for a very very long time over 9/11.
dmoneytuttle 7 months ago
@dmoneytuttle Bingo!, and it worked well. "Terrorism is the best politic weapon. for nothing drives people harder than a fear of sudden death" Adolf hitler."
AronHallan 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@dmoneytuttle No that's my other account. Basically all you truthers are the same, facts eliminate ANY possibility of your stupid theory EVER happening so you try to attack the "person' lol How sad, you have a "faith" based belief that 911 was an inside job with no proof , non. All you do is attack the person, because you have nothing, no facts, just a loser who thinks 911 was an inside job. go die in a fire.
theBartone9119 7 months ago
This was no classic controlled demolition, of course they'll try to hide things, these people are extremely crafty. the zombie theory makes a lot of sense, that would make them like 90% of the population. Bet you dont believe in chem trails, gmo's, fixed elections, going to war without taking proper steps, wmd's, social security, bank failures,and all the other lies were fed. I'm sorry but there's no way that building would fall that way just by being hit with debri. Reason for war.
dmoneytuttle 7 months ago
You show this video to a chicken ,and it'll say: 9/11 was INSIDE JOB...
But unfortunatly you show this to million of so called HUMAN beings ,they will tell you...Oh government LOVES us ,government will never do a thing like this!!
They won't even bother go and find out about GMO food or vaccines , water they drink or the CHEMTRAILED air they breath !
Endza50 7 months ago
you could show this to ALOT of people, and they still would not believe for anything. Just crazy.
dmoneytuttle 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@dmoneytuttle Only a lunatic would believe in this controlled demolition garbage:
Firefighter: "You see where the white smoke is, you see it leaning like this? It's definetley coming down, there's no way to stop it!
/watch?v=WnYBX6QT0R4
Reporter: "The brown building, the tall one, is number 7 , World Trade Center, I've heard several different reports from several different officers now, that this is the building that is going to come down next"
/watch?v=O-WZpXiEKAo
OMG NO MYSTERY!!
NWODisinfoAgent 7 months ago
@dmoneytuttle Where is the river of detonation cords that can be seen if it was a classic controlled demolition? where are the multiple bright flashes from explosions that should be seen if if there actually any were explosives? Where are the squibs (REAL squibs) that should be seen on all demolitions? A job that big would take 6 months to prep, how did they do it with the employees inside, considering you have to strip a building bare to get to it's support? Were the workers zombies?
NWODisinfoAgent 7 months ago
@NWODisinfoAgent You working for the gov.?CIA?What?
dmoneytuttle 7 months ago
Comment removed
theBartone9119 7 months ago
@NWODisinfoAgent they shut parts of the elevators down for SO called maintance, so well over 5-6 months, also did the same in towers 1 +2 :) oh and armed guards were present thoughout this period of time.
dan832 5 months ago
Jewish activist/toilet paper mogul Sol Weinbergwitz says: “It isn’t much of a leap to go from ‘I don’t buy the official 9/11 story’ to ‘Israel was involved with 9/11.’ That’s really what some of them think.” (Yep, that’s what some of them think.)
pollyfrazer 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
IT IS ONE HUNDRED PERCENT CERTAIN that 9-11 was a Mossad operation - period.
- Dr. Alan Sabrosky, former director of Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College
connieusa27 7 months ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
IT IS ONE HUNDRED PERCENT CERTAIN that 9-11 was a Mossad operation - period.
- Dr. Alan Sabrosky, former director of Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College
connieusa27 7 months ago 2
It's kinda like that Ted Bundy dude who killed all the coeds, The zhids won't admit their complicity until the last possible moment.
dorothyspotts 7 months ago 8
Waterboarding Larry Silverstein would save a lot of investigative work.
ensgavry 7 months ago in playlist WTC Building 7 39
it was a controlled demolition because what building randomly colapses out of nowhere?
Gamesheep11 7 months ago 7
This comment has received too many negative votes show
plus think how the government feels, someone attacked you, they got him for you, and you think they did it....they are probably like WTF! lol
kushsmokkeralt 7 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
also google "An Architect for 9/11 Twoof" DONT donate to scam artists! Vote Real SCIENCE! Trust me the last thing these guys want is a real investigation, it would prove them all wrong! That's why they are in the business, because they know the investigation will never happen.
kushsmokkeralt 7 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
google "So I decided to check in on AE911..." you'll find out they all lie about science to make money, and they train you to refute real science as "physically impossible" so you keep believing their bullshit. HUGE money scam for donations that go right in the pocket of Mr.Gage's private bank. When the Dylan Avery, Jason Bermas "lie" movement died, and Alex jone's stopped 911 to push NWO, AE911 came up to revive the scam. Don't be fooled, they pocket donations and spread false science.
kushsmokkeralt 7 months ago
@kushsmokkeralt
you are duped by your delusions, or just a trollbot
ensgavry 7 months ago 13
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Just because there were a lot of cover ups for national security and foreign policy reasons, don't let that government deception fool you into thinking they are lying because they PULLED THE FUCKING THING OFF!! Apples and Oranges is an understatement for this kind of logic.
kushsmokkeralt 7 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
When 911 happened, Bush was probably pissed it wasn't Saddam that did it, so he tried to squeeze him in there anyway for daddy. You guys have to think about all the factors, inside job make NO SENSE to a logical person who breaks it down.
kushsmokkeralt 7 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
We've done more fucked up shit to countries with just the pre-text of "helping our allies". They wouldn't need to pull off something as intricate as 911 to go to war. If the president wants to go to war? He can very well. Noone was behind the Iraq war, or Vietnam war, but you're saying they had to pull off 911 to go to fucking afghanistan! lol If 911 was fake they would have just said Saddam did it, we would have bought it, Bush's been trying to get him for years. "inside job" YOUR NUTS!
kushsmokkeralt 7 months ago
Comment removed
kushsmokkeralt 7 months ago
And here is the reason why the buildings were prepared for controlled demolition:
youtube.com/watch?v=VCDELsbxFC0
howsandwhys 7 months ago 3